1
|
Chen S, Zhang T, Zhang J, Ma X, Wu P, Liu S, Lan X, Gao H. Current Status and Prospects of Pediatric Stone Disease: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study. Cureus 2024; 16:e56549. [PMID: 38646203 PMCID: PMC11027950 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Pediatric stone disease, once considered rare, has emerged as a significant research area in the past two decades due to a sharp increase in its incidence. Understanding the evolving epidemiology and treatment strategies for pediatric stone disease is crucial for enhancing child health protection. This study aims to summarize the advancements in pediatric stone disease research over the last two decades through bibliometric analysis. We conducted a comprehensive search in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) for literature on pediatric stone disease from January 1, 2000 to February 20, 2024. Econometric analyses were performed using tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package "bibliometrix." Our search yielded 1,208 publications, predominantly from the United States and Turkey, showing an annual increase in publications on pediatric stone disease. Leading research institutions include Dicle University, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the University of Pennsylvania, with the Journal of Pediatric Urology publishing the highest number of articles. The most prolific authors were C.P. Nelson and B. Hoppe, with Caleb P. Nelson being the most co-cited author. Research themes primarily focused on risk factors and therapeutic approaches for pediatric stone disease. Emerging research hotspots are identified by keywords such as mechanism, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, recurrence, and retrograde intrarenal surgery. The study forecasts a continued upward trend in global research on pediatric stone disease, with future studies likely to delve deeper into risk factors and novel therapeutic methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng Chen
- Medicine, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, CHN
| | - Ting Zhang
- Integrative/Complementary Medicine, Ruikang Hospital, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, CHN
| | - Jianqiang Zhang
- Urology, Ruikang Hospital, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, CHN
| | - Xiaohan Ma
- Medicine, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, CHN
| | - PeiZhong Wu
- Medicine, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, CHN
| | - Shaoning Liu
- Medicine, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, CHN
| | - Xuan Lan
- Medicine, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, CHN
| | - Hongjun Gao
- Urology, Ruikang Hospital, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, CHN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang X, Wu S, Li Z, Wang D, Lei C, Liu T, Wang X, Li S. Comparison of Thulium Fiber Laser versus Holmium laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Urol 2024; 24:44. [PMID: 38374098 PMCID: PMC10875760 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01419-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser (TFL) to holmium: YAG (Ho: YAG) laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for urolithiasis. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CENTRAL, SinoMed, CNKI database, VIP and Wanfang Database were systematically searched for all relevant clinical trials until September 2023. References were explored to identify the relevant articles. Meta-analysis was carried out for the retrieved studies using RevMan5.4.1 software, and the risk ratio, mean difference and 95% confidence interval were expressed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The main outcomes of this meta-analysis were stone-free rate (SFR), perioperative outcomes and intraoperative or postoperative complications. RESULTS Thirteen studies, including 1394 patients, were included. According to the results of pooled analysis, TFL was associated with significantly higher stone-free rate (SFR) [0.52, 95% CI (0.32, 0.85), P = 0.009], shorter operation time [-5.47, 95% CI (-8.86, -2.08), P = 0.002], and less stone migration [0.17, 95% CI (0.06, 0.50), P = 0.001]. However, there was no significant difference in terms of the laser time, duration of hospital stay, drop of hemoglobin level, total energy, postoperative ureteral stenting, the incidence of intraoperative complications or postoperative complications between TFL and Ho: YAGs. CONCLUSION The findings of this study demonstrated several advantages of TFL in terms of higher SFR, shorter operative time and less stone migration. TRIAL REGISTRATION The protocol of this systematic review was listed in PROSPERO ( www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ) (Protocol number: CRD42022362550).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Tang
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
- Department of Biological Repositories, Cancer Precision Diagnosis and Treatment and Translational Medicine Hubei Engineering Research Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Shaojie Wu
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Zhilong Li
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Du Wang
- The Institute of Technological Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China
| | - Cheng Lei
- The Institute of Technological Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China
| | - Tongzu Liu
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Xinghuan Wang
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| | - Sheng Li
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, China.
- Department of Biological Repositories, Cancer Precision Diagnosis and Treatment and Translational Medicine Hubei Engineering Research Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Solano C, Candela L, Panthier F, Corrales M, Traxer O. Initial experience with the graphical user interface for laser parameters setting of a new thulium fibre laser source device for urinary pathologies treatment. World J Urol 2023; 41:3765-3771. [PMID: 37833547 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04631-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the concordance between the pre-settings ranges of thulium fibre laser (TFL) (Coloplast TFL Drive, Denmark) with easy-to-use graphical user interface and the laser settings used by a high-volume endo-urologist during surgical procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS In October 2022, we prospectively collected data of 67 patients who underwent TFL Drive (Coloplast, Denmark) for the management of urinary stones. Urothelial tumour (upper tract urinary cancer (UTUC) and bladder) 200 and 150 μm laser fibres were used for procedures. Stones characteristics (size and density) tumours and stenosis localizations, laser-on time (LOT), and laser settings were recorded. We also assessed the ablation speed (mm3/s), laser power (W), and Joules/mm3 values for each lithotripsy. RESULTS A total 67 patients took part in the study. Median age was 52 (15-81) years. 55 (82%), 8 (12%), and 4 (6%) patients presented urinary stones, urothelial tumour, and stenosis, respectively. Median stone volume was 438 (36-6027) mm3 and median density was 988 (376-2000) HU. Median pulse energy was 0.6 (0.3-1.2), 0.8 (0.5-1) and 1 J for urinary stones, urothelial tumour and stenosis respectably. Endoscopically stone-free rate was 89%. Graphical user interface and surgeon accordance with the safety range were observed in 93.2%, 100% and 100% for urinary stones, UTUC and stenosis, respectively. CONCLUSION During endoscopic procedures for urinary stones treatment, it is frequently needed to change laser parameters. These new TFL and GUI technology parameters remained in the pre-set security range in 94.1% of procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catalina Solano
- GRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France
- Department of Endourology, Uroclin S.A.S, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Luigi Candela
- GRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI-Urological Research Institute IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Frederic Panthier
- GRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Mariela Corrales
- GRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Traxer
- GRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France.
- Service d'Urologie, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Ulvik Ø, Beisland C, Somani BK. Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (P-PCNL) reporting checklist. Scand J Urol 2023; 58:115-119. [PMID: 37987596 DOI: 10.2340/sju.v58.13392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a reporting checklist that serves to improve and standardise reporting in studies pertaining to paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS Based on findings from systematic review of literature, a draft list of items was formulated. By process of review and revisions, a finalised version was established and consensus achieved. RESULTS The finalised version of the checklist covers four main sections, which include the following areas: study details, pre-operative, operative and post-operative information. There are 18 further sub-items. Recommendations deemed to be of high importance to include are highlighted in bold. CONCLUSION This practical tool can aid clinicians and researchers when undertaking and reviewing studies on paediatric PCNL. This is highly relevant given the current heterogeneity that exists as well as debate in best practice patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Juliebø‐Jones P, Ventimiglia E, Somani BK, Æsøy MS, Gjengstø P, Beisland C, Ulvik Ø. Single use flexible ureteroscopes: Current status and future directions. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:613-621. [PMID: 37818020 PMCID: PMC10560621 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Single use ureteroscopes are a technological innovation that have become available in the past decade and gained increased popularity. To this end, there are now an increasing number of both benchside and clinical studies reporting outcomes associated with their use. Our aim was to deliver a narrative review in order to provide an overview of this new technology. Methods A narrative review was performed to gain overview of the history of the technology's development, equipment specifications and to highlight potential advantages and disadvantages. Results Findings from preclinical studies highlight potenial advantages in terms of the design of single use ureteroscopes such as the lower weight and more recent modifications such as pressure control. However, concerns regarding plastic waste and environmental impact still remain unanswered. Clinical studies reveal them to have a non inferior status for outcomes such as stone free rate. However, the volume of evidence, especially in terms of randomised trials remains limited. From a cost perspective, study conclusions are still conflicting and centres are recommended to perform their own micro cost analyses. Conclusions Most clinical outcomes for single use ureteroscopes currently match those achieved by reusable ureteroscopes but the data pool is still limited. Areas of continued debate include their environmental impact and cost efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø‐Jones
- Department of UrologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- EAU YAU Urolithiasis groupArmhemNetherlands
| | - Eugenio Ventimiglia
- EAU YAU Urolithiasis groupArmhemNetherlands
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | | | | | - Peder Gjengstø
- Department of UrologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of UrologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
| | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of UrologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, De Coninck V, Uguzova S, Tzelves L, Æsøy MS, Beisland C, Somani BK, Ulvik Ø. Controversies in ureteroscopy: lasers, scopes, ureteral access sheaths, practice patterns and beyond. Front Surg 2023; 10:1274583. [PMID: 37780913 PMCID: PMC10533910 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1274583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Ureteroscopy has become an increasingly popular surgical intervention for conditions such as urinary stone disease. As new technologies and techniques become available, debate regarding their proper use has risen. This includes the role of single use ureteroscopes, optimal laser for stone lithotripsy, basketing versus dusting, the impact of ureteral access sheath, the need for safety guidewire, fluoroscopy free URS, imaging and follow up practices are all areas which have generated a lot of debate. This review serves to evaluate each of these issues and provide a balanced conclusion to guide the clinician in their practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- EAU Young Academic urology Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Etienne Xavier Keller
- EAU Young Academic urology Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vincent De Coninck
- EAU Young Academic urology Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
- Department of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
| | - Sabine Uguzova
- Department of Urology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- EAU Young Academic urology Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanogleion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bhaskar K. Somani
- Department of Urology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chua ME, Bobrowski A, Ahmad I, Kim JK, Silangcruz JM, Rickard M, Lorenzo A, Lee JY. Thulium fibre laser vs holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis: meta-analysis of clinical studies. BJU Int 2023; 131:383-394. [PMID: 36260370 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare and assess the clinical outcomes between thulium fibre laser (TFL) and holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser endoscopic lithotripsy of urolithiasis through a meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in May 2022, grey literature search in July 2022. Comparative clinical studies were evaluated according to Cochrane recommendations. Assessed outcomes include the stone-free rate (SFR), complication rate, operative time (OT), laser utilisation time (LUT), ablation rate (stone volume/laser time), ablation efficiency (energy use/stone volume), total energy usage, degree of retropulsion, and hospital stay. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) were extrapolated. Subgroup analyses, heterogeneity, publication bias, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment were performed. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration: CRD42022300788. RESULTS A total of 15 studies with 1698 cases were included in this review. The outcome of SFR showed no significant between-group difference (RR 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.20). However, subgroup analysis of TFL vs Ho:YAG with no pulse modulation showed a SFR favouring TFL (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23). The composite postoperative complication rate was comparable between the two intervention groups (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.66-1.43). OT, LUT and ablation rate were significantly better for TFL than Ho:YAG (SMD -1.19, 95% CI -1.85 to -0.52; SMD -1.67, 95% CI -2.62 to -0.72; SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.15-1.03; respectively). The degree of retropulsion was significantly lower for TFL than Ho:YAG without pulse modulation (SMD -1.23, 95% CI -1.74 to -0.71). Ablation efficiency, total energy usage, and hospital stay were all comparable. Based on GRADE criteria, the evidence certainty was determined to be very low. CONCLUSION Overall, there was no between-group difference for the SFR. However, compared to Ho:YAG with no pulse modulation, TFL rendered a better SFR. Shorter OT and LUT, a lesser degree of retropulsion, and a better ablation rate were noted in favour of the TFL. There was no overall between-group difference for composite postoperative complication rate, ablation efficiency, total energy usage, and hospital stay. Currently, the available clinical evidence was assessed to be of very low certainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Chua
- Global Surgery Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Adam Bobrowski
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ihtisham Ahmad
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jin Kyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mandy Rickard
- Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Armando Lorenzo
- Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jason Y Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
García-Rojo E, Traxer O, Vallejo Arzayús DM, Castellani D, Ferretti S, Gatti C, Bujons Tur A, Quiroz Madarriaga Y, Teoh JYC, Ragoori DR, Bhatia TP, Chandra Mohan V, Shrestha A, Lim EJ, Sinha M, Griffin S, Pietropaolo A, Fong KY, Tanidir Y, Somani BK, Gauhar V. Comparison of Low-Power vs High-Power Holmium lasers in pediatric RIRS outcomes. J Endourol 2023; 37:509-515. [PMID: 36860192 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES to compare the outcomes of using low-power (up to 30W) vs high-power (up to 120W) holmium lasers in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in children and to analyse if lasering techniques and the use of access sheath have any influence on the outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 9 centres of children who underwent RIRS with holmium laser for the treatment of kidney stones between January 2015 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: high-power and low-power holmium laser. Clinical, perioperative variables and complications were analysed. Outcomes were compared between groups using Student's T-test for continuous variables, and Chi-square and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. A multivariable logistic regression analysis model was also performed. RESULTS 314 patients were included. A high-power and low-power holmium laser was used in 97 and 217 patients, respectively. Clinical and demographic variables were comparable between both groups, except for stone size where the low-power group treated larger stones (mean 11.11 mm vs 9.70 mm; p 0.018). In the high-power laser group, a reduction in surgical time was found (mean 64.29 min vs 75.27 min; p 0.018) with a significantly higher stone-free rate (SFR) (mean 81.4% vs 59%; p <0.001). We found no statistical differences in complication rates. The multivariate logistic regression model showed lower SFR in the low-power holmium group, especially with larger (p = 0.011) and multiple stones (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our real-world pediatric multicenter study favours high-power holmium laser and establishes its safety and efficacy in children. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther García-Rojo
- Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, 221921, Department of Urology, Calle Oña, 10, Madrid, 28050, Madrid, Spain, 28050;
| | - Olivier Traxer
- Sorbonne Universite, 27063, GRC#20 Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, Île-de-France, France;
| | | | - Daniele Castellani
- AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 18494, via conca 71, Ancona, Italy, 60126;
| | | | - Claudia Gatti
- University Hospital of Parma, 18630, Pediatric Surgery, Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy;
| | - Anna Bujons Tur
- Fundacio Puigvert, 16444, Pediatric Urology, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain;
| | | | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Surgery, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, New Territories., Hong Kong, Hong Kong;
| | - Deepak Reddy Ragoori
- Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, 519389, Urology, 6-3-562/A, behind MORE megamart, Errum Manzil, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500082;
| | - Tanuj Paul Bhatia
- Sarvodaya Hospital, 76257, Urology, Sector 8, Faridabad, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121006.,Sarvodaya Hospital and research centre, Sector 8, Faridabad, Faridabad, India;
| | - Vaddi Chandra Mohan
- preeti urology and kidney hospital, Urology, MIG-1,307, Raod No.4 , KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500072;
| | | | - Ee Jean Lim
- Singapore General Hospital, Department of Urology, Academia Level 5, 20 College Rd, Singapore 169856, Singapore, Singapore, 169856;
| | - Mrigyanka Sinha
- University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Stephen Griffin
- University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Paediatric Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Amelia Pietropaolo
- University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Khi Yung Fong
- National University of Singapore, 37580, Singapore, Singapore;
| | - Yiloren Tanidir
- Marmara University School of Medicine, Urology, Marmara Universitesi Pendik EAH, Fevzi Cakmak Mah. Mimar Sinan Cad., No:41 Uroloji AD. Kat:4, Ust kaynarca / Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey, 34899;
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Urology, Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, SO16 6YD.,United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 242949, Urology, Singapore, Singapore;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zeng G, Traxer O, Zhong W, Osther P, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Mazzon G, Seitz C, Geavlete P, Fiori C, Ghani KR, Chew BH, Git KA, Vicentini FC, Papatsoris A, Brehmer M, Martinez JL, Cheng J, Cheng F, Gao X, Gadzhiev N, Pietropaolo A, Proietti S, Ye Z, Sarica K. International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int 2023; 131:153-164. [PMID: 35733358 PMCID: PMC10084014 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To set out the second in a series of guidelines on the treatment of urolithiasis by the International Alliance of Urolithiasis that concerns retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), with the aim of providing a clinical framework for urologists performing RIRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS After a comprehensive search of RIRS-related literature published between 1 January 1964 and 1 October 2021 from the PubMed database, systematic review and assessment were performed to inform a series of recommendations, which were graded using modified GRADE methodology. Additionally, quality of evidence was classified using a modification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence system. Finally, related comments were provided. RESULTS A total of 36 recommendations were developed and graded that covered the following topics: indications and contraindications; preoperative imaging; preoperative ureteric stenting; preoperative medications; peri-operative antibiotics; management of antithrombotic therapy; anaesthesia; patient positioning; equipment; lithotripsy; exit strategy; and complications. CONCLUSION The series of recommendations regarding RIRS, along with the related commentary and supporting documentation, offered here should help provide safe and effective performance of RIRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of UrologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Olivier Traxer
- GRC Urolithiasis No. 20, Sorbonne UniversityTenon HospitalParisFrance
| | - Wen Zhong
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of UrologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Palle Osther
- Department of Urology, Vejle Hospital‐a part of Lillebaelt HospitalUniversity Hospital of Southern DenmarkVejleDenmark
| | | | - Glenn M Preminger
- Division of Urologic SurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | | | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General HospitalMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Petrisor Geavlete
- Sanador HospitalBucharestRomania
- Department of UrologySf. Ioan Emergency Clinical HospitalBucharestRomania
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of OncologyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
| | | | - Ben H. Chew
- Department of Urologic SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Kah Ann Git
- Department of UrologyPantai HospitalPenangMalaysia
| | - Fabio Carvalho Vicentini
- Departamento de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – FMUSPHospital das ClínicasSão PauloBrazil
| | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- 2nd Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sismanoglio HospitalNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
| | - Marianne Brehmer
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska InstitutetDanderyd HospitalStockholmSweden
| | | | - Jiwen Cheng
- Department of UrologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical UniversityNanningChina
| | - Fan Cheng
- Department of UrologyRenmin Hospital of Wuhan UniversityWuhanChina
| | - Xiaofeng Gao
- Department of UrologyChanghai HospitalShanghaiChina
| | - Nariman Gadzhiev
- Department of UrologySaint‐Petersburg State University HospitalSaint‐PetersburgRussia
| | | | | | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Medical College, Tongji HospitalHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Medical SchoolBiruni UniversityIstanbulTurkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Ulvik Ø, Beisland C, Somani BK. Paediatric Ureteroscopy (P-URS) reporting checklist: a new tool to aid studies report the essential items on paediatric ureteroscopy for stone disease. Urolithiasis 2023; 51:35. [PMID: 36695936 PMCID: PMC9876849 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-023-01408-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The burden of urolithiasis in children is increasing and this is mirrored by the number of surgical interventions in the form of ureteroscopy (URS). There exist many challenges in performing this surgery for this special patient group as well as a lack of consensus on technique. There is also large variation in how results are described and reported. There exists therefore, a need to improve and standardise the core outcomes, which are reported. To this end, we developed a new checklist to aid studies report the essential items on paediatric URS for stone disease. The Paediatric Ureteroscopy (P-URS) reporting checklist comprises four main sections (study details, pre-operative, operative and post-operative) and a total of 20 items. The tool covers a range of important elements, such as pre-stenting, complications, follow-up, stone-free rate, concomitant medical expulsive therapy and imaging, which are often lacking in studies. The checklist provides a summary of essential items that authors can use as a reference to improve general standards of reporting paediatric URS studies and increase the body of knowledge shared accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
- EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Basulto-Martínez M, Proietti S, Pavia MP, Yeow Y, Eisner BH, Giusti G. Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study. Urolithiasis 2023; 51:32. [PMID: 36648558 PMCID: PMC9845154 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01402-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
This study sought to analyze the ablation rates of Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (TFL) under different settings combinations. Lasering was carried out by a computed spiral pattern through a stepper motor bearing a laser fiber. BegoStones were placed inside a water container and lasered therein and the ablation rate was calculated. Different combinations were tested for ~12 Watts (W) for Ho:YAG and TFL lasers. Further 25 W combination for TFL were conducted testing higher frequencies. One-hundred-one experiments were conducted. Under ~12 W, the highest ablation rate for Ho:YAG was obtained with 40 Hz/0.3 J, and Virtual Basket™ (VB) emission mode [114.35 (88.30 - 126.40) mg/min] whereas for TFL, using 40 Hz/0.3 J, and long pulse [143.40 (137.40 - 146) mg/min]. A matched-comparison for 12 Hz/1 J settings showed that TFL outperformed Ho:YAG using medium pulse [63.30 (55.30 - 81.30) vs 132.00 (115.70 - 228.60) mg/min, p=0.016] and long pulse [62.90 (51.60 - 78.90) vs 134.70 (110.60 - 149.30) mg/min, p=0.016]. In the 40 Hz/0.3 J settings, TFL outperformed Ho:YAG (p=0.034). Nonetheless, Ho:YAG with VB's ablation rate increased [114.35 (88.30 - 126.40)], being comparable to that of TFL with medium pulse [127.5 (88.90 - 141.70)] (p=0.400). In TFL 25 W experiments, the ablation rate of 500 Hz / 0.05 J, was higher than those of 1000 Hz / 0.025 J (p=0.049). TFL ablation rate is higher than that of Ho:YAG. Moreover, the Virtual Basket™ emission mode, increased Ho:YAG ablation rates, resulting reaching similar to that of TFL in certain modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Basulto-Martínez
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- European Training Center in Endourology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Península de Yucatán, Merida, Mexico
| | - Silvia Proietti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- European Training Center in Endourology, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Pavia
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- European Training Center in Endourology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, "Ospedale Riuniti" University Hospital, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Yuyi Yeow
- European Training Center in Endourology, Milan, Italy
| | - Brian H Eisner
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
- European Training Center in Endourology, Milan, Italy.
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Ospedale San Raffaele S.r.l., Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, Tzelves L, Beisland C, Somani BK, Gjengstø P, Æsøy MS, Ulvik Ø. Paediatric kidney stone surgery: state-of-the-art review. Ther Adv Urol 2023; 15:17562872231159541. [PMID: 36950219 PMCID: PMC10026105 DOI: 10.1177/17562872231159541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
While urolithiasis in children is rare, the global incidence is rising, and the volume of minimally invasive surgeries being performed reflects this. There have been many developments in the technology, which have supported the advancement of these interventions. However, innovation of this kind has also resulted in wide-ranging practice patterns and debate regarding how they should be best implemented. This is in addition to the extra challenges faced when treating stone disease in children where the patient population often has a higher number of comorbidities and for example, the need to avoid risk such as ionising exposure is higher. The overall result is a number of challenges and controversies surrounding many facets of paediatric stone surgery such as imaging choice, follow-up and different treatment options, for example, medical expulsive therapy, shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This article provides an overview of the current status of paediatric stone surgery and discussion on the key topics of debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Etienne Xavier Keller
- Department of Urology, University Hospital
Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland EAU YAU Urolithiasis
Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- Second Department of Urology, National and
Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens,
Greece EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University
Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of
Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital
Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Peder Gjengstø
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University
Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen,
NorwayDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen,
Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tzelves L, Geraghty RM, Hughes T, Juliebø-Jones P, Somani BK. Innovations in Kidney Stone Removal. Res Rep Urol 2023; 15:131-139. [PMID: 37069942 PMCID: PMC10105588 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s386844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Urolithiasis is a common clinical condition, and surgical treatment is performed with different minimally invasive procedures, such as ureteroscopy, shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Although the transition from open surgery to endourological procedures to treat this condition has been a paradigm shift, ongoing technological advancements have permitted further improvement of clinical outcomes with the development of modern equipment. Such innovations in kidney stone removal are new lasers, modern ureteroscopes, development of applications and training systems utilizing three-dimensional models, artificial intelligence and virtual reality, implementation of robotic systems, sheaths connected to vacuum devices and new types of lithotripters. Innovations in kidney stone removal have led to an exciting new era of endourological options for patients and clinicians alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lazaros Tzelves
- Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Thomas Hughes
- Department of Urology, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, UK
| | | | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Correspondence: Bhaskar K Somani, Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, 19 Tremona Road, Southampton, SO535DS, UK, Tel +44-2381206873, Email
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Denstedt J, Gabrigna Berto FC. Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: Is it living up to the Hype? Asian J Urol 2022. [PMID: 37538164 PMCID: PMC10394282 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser (Ho:YAG) has been the gold standard for laser lithotripsy over the last three decades. After demonstrating good in vitro efficacy, the thulium fiber laser (TFL) has been recently released in the market and the initial clinical results are encouraging. This article aims to review the main technology differences between the Ho:YAG laser and the TFL, discuss the initial clinical results with the TFL as well as the optimal settings for TFL lithotripsy. Methods We reviewed the literature focusing on the technological aspects of the Ho:YAG laser and TFL as well as the results of in vitro and in vivo studies comparing both technologies. Results In vitro studies show a technical superiority of TFL compared to the Ho:YAG laser and encouraging results have been demonstrated in clinical practice. However, as TFL is a new technology, limited studies are currently available, and the optimal settings for lithotripsy are not yet established. Conclusion TFL has the potential to be an alternative to the Ho:YAG laser, but more reports are still needed to determine the optimal laser for lithotripsy of urinary tract stones when considering all parameters including effectiveness, safety, and costs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Somani BK. Endourology landscape: winners and losers based on a review of UK national database. BJU Int 2022; 130:271-272. [PMID: 35998905 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
De Lorenzis E, Zanetti SP, Boeri L, Montanari E. Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11175157. [PMID: 36079083 PMCID: PMC9457409 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and its miniaturized modifications are usually considered the standard surgical options for large (>20 mm) staghorn and infected stones. Moreover, PCNL is a viable alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for smaller stones (<20 mm) in the presence of anatomical malformations or inaccessible lower pole stones. However, due to the advancements in laser and scope technology, RIRS is expanding its indications with the potential benefits of lower complications and a shorter hospital stay. Methods: A literature search using the PUBMED database from inception to June 2022 was performed to explore the current role of PCNL in endourology. The analysis involved a narrative synthesis. Results: PCNL confirmed its role in the treatment of large and complex stones; moreover, miniaturized PCNL has become more competitive, gaining space among classic indications of flexible ureteroscopy. Conclusions: considering all the evaluated subgroups, we can conclude that PCNL is an old fascinating procedure and is here to stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa De Lorenzis
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Stefano Paolo Zanetti
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, Haugland JN, Æsøy MS, Beisland C, Somani BK, Ulvik Ø. Advances in Ureteroscopy: New technologies and current innovations in the era of Tailored Endourological Stone Treatment (TEST). JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/20514158221115986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Ureteroscopy has undergone many advances in recent decades. As a result, it is able to treat an increasing range of patient groups including special populations such as pregnancy, anomalous kidneys and extremes of age. Such advances include Holmium laser, high-power systems and pulse modulation. Thulium fibre laser is a more recent introduction to clinical practice. Ureteroscopes have also been improved alongside vision and optics. This article provides an up-to-date guide to these topics as well as disposable scopes, pressure control and developments in operating planning and patient aftercare. These advances allow for a custom strategy to be applied to the individual patient in what we describe using a new term: Tailored endourological stone treatment (TEST). Level of evidence: 5
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Etienne Xavier Keller
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P, Beisland C, Ulvik Ø. Temperature profiles during ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser and holmium:YAG laser: Findings from a pre-clinical study. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:313-319. [PMID: 35924316 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2104367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate temperature profiles in both the renal pelvis and parenchyma during Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) and Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser activation in an ex-vivo porcine model. METHODS Three porcine kidneys with intact renal pelvis and proximal ureters were used in the study. A temperature sensor was inserted through a nephrostomy tube into the renal pelvis and a second sensor was inserted directly into the renal parenchyma. Temperatures were recorded during continuous laser activation for 180 s, and for an additional 60 s after deactivation. TFL (150 μm and 200 μm) and Ho:YAG (270 μm) laser delivered power at settings of 2.4 W, 8 W, 20 W and 30 W. RESULTS Intrapelvic temperatures correlated directly to power settings. Higher power produced higher temperatures. For example, using a 150 μm fiber at 2.4 W resulted in a 2.6 °C rise from baseline (p = 0.008), whereas using the same fiber at 20 W produced a rise in temperature of 19.9 °C (p = 0.02). Larger laser fibers caused significantly higher temperatures compared to smaller fibers using equivalent power settings, e.g. mean temperature at 20 W using 150 μm was 39.6 °C compared to 44.9 °C using 200 μm, p < 0.001. There was a significant increase in parenchymal temperatures when applying 20 W and 30 W of laser power with the two larger fibers. CONCLUSION In this ex-vivo study, renal temperatures correlated directly to power settings. Higher power produced higher temperatures. Furthermore, larger laser fibers caused higher temperatures. These findings could help guide selection of safe power settings for ureteroscopic lithotripsy, but future clinical studies are needed for confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Æsøy
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - P Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - C Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ø Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P, Gjengstø P, Beisland C. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol 2022; 82:73-79. [PMID: 35300888 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser is the gold standard for ureterorenoscopic (URS) lithotripsy. Thulium fibre laser (TFL) has recently been introduced as a new technology and may challenge Ho:YAG as the preferred laser owing to favourable properties as demonstrated in preclinical studies. OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare outcomes after URS lithotripsy with Ho:YAG and TFL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In a prospective randomised trial, patients aged ≥18 yr with ureteral and/or renal stones (≥5 mm) scheduled to undergo day-case URS lithotripsy were invited to participate. In total, 120 consecutively admitted patients with signed consent were included for randomisation. INTERVENTION URS lithotripsy with Ho:YAG or TFL. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcome was the stone-free rate (SFR) assessed on noncontrast computed tomography at 3-mo follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the operative time and complications. Outcomes were compared between the groups using the t test and χ2 test. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS After a single session, the SFR was 67% in the Ho:YAG group and 92% in the TFL group, p = 0.001. For ureteral stones, the SFR was 100% in both groups, and for renal stones; 49% (Ho:YAG) and 86% (TFL), p = 0.001. Operative time was shorter using TFL (49 min) compared to Ho:YAG (57 min), p = 0.008. Bleeding that impaired the endoscopic view was the most frequent intraoperative adverse event and occurred in 13 patients (22%) in the Ho:YAG group and three (5%) in the TFL group, p = 0.014. CONCLUSIONS In this study, significantly more patients with renal stones achieved stone-free status and fewer experienced intraoperative complications using TFL compared to Ho:YAG. TFL is the emerging laser of choice for stone lithotripsy. PATIENT SUMMARY We compared outcomes after ureterorenoscopic treatment of kidney and ureteral stones using two different lasers. Our results show that the new thulium fibre laser technology is superior to the current standard laser (holmium:YAG) in clearing kidney stones and reducing operative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | | | - Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Peder Gjengstø
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027. Eur Urol 2022; 82:e43-e44. [PMID: 35661627 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
21
|
Ulvik Ø, Sørstrand Æsøy M, Juliebø-Jones P, Gjengstø P, Beisland C. Reply to Hyung Joon Kim and Khurshid R. Ghani's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027. Eur Urol 2022; 82:e41-e42. [PMID: 35568598 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | | | - Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Peder Gjengstø
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ulvik Ø, Sørstrand Æsøy M, Juliebø-Jones P, Gjengstø P, Beisland C. Reply to Frederic Panthier, Alba Sierra, and Olivier Traxer's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027. Eur Urol 2022; 82:e37-e38. [PMID: 35551843 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | | | - Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Peder Gjengstø
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ulvik Ø, Sørstrand Æsøy M, Juliebø-Jones P, Gjengstø P, Beisland C. Reply to Alan J. Yaghoubian, Jonathan A. Khusid, and Mantu Gupta's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027. Eur Urol 2022; 82:e45-e46. [PMID: 35551844 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | | | - Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Peder Gjengstø
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Leonard AJ, Garg N, Chen TT, Monga M. Case of the Month from UCSD, San Diego, USA: Treatment of giant dystrophic prostatic calcification using MOSES holmium laser. BJU Int 2022; 129:306-308. [PMID: 35297157 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Austin J Leonard
- San Diego School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Nishant Garg
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tony T Chen
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Manoj Monga
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Pietropaolo A, Æsøy MS, Ulvik Ø, Beisland C, Bres-Niewada E, Somani BK. Endourological management of encrusted ureteral stents: an up-to-date guide and treatment algorithm on behalf of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urology Urolithiasis Group. Cent European J Urol 2022; 74:571-578. [PMID: 35083079 PMCID: PMC8771125 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Encrustation of ureteral stents can represent a complex challenge. Patients can require multiple intervention types as well as several operative sessions. Our aim was to establish a practical guide for managing such cases as well as an accompanying treatment algorithm. Nearly all cases can now be successfully managed with minimally invasive methods such as ureteroscopy and/or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Use of a validated tool for grading burden of encrustation is recommended. Careful patient counselling as well as operative planning are of paramount importance. Identifying high risk patient groups such as pregnancy and implementing prevention strategies are also crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Amelia Pietropaolo
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ewa Bres-Niewada
- Department of Urology, Roefler Memorial Hospital, Pruszków, Poland.,Faculty of Medicine, Lazarski University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Management of Kidney Stone Disease in Pregnancy: A Practical and Evidence-Based Approach. Curr Urol Rep 2022; 23:263-270. [PMID: 36197640 PMCID: PMC9732063 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01112-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Suspected kidney stone disease during pregnancy is a difficult condition for health professionals to manage. This is partly due to the more limited range of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, which can be safely applied. A comprehensive review of literature was performed to identify evidence to develop a practical guide to aid clinicians. RECENT FINDINGS Ultrasound remains the recommended first line option for imaging. Complicated cases, such as suspected infected obstructed system, require urgent decompression such as in the form of percutaneous nephrostomy. This article highlights the pharmacotherapeutic agents, which are considered safe for use in pregnancy. Where surgical intervention is indicated, evidence supports ureteroscopy to be a safe option as long as infection has been treated. Ureteroscopy can offer definitive clearance of the stone(s) and can be less burdensome regarding bothersome symptoms compared to indwelling ureteral stent or nephrostomy, which also require regular exchange due to the high propensity for encrustation in pregnancy. A multidisciplinary approach is fundamental to safely manage suspected kidney stone disease in pregnancy. Adoption of a locally agreed pathway as suggested in this article supports improved patient care.
Collapse
|
27
|
The art of shockwave lithotripsy is an endangered species and is worth saving: the perspective of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urology (YAU) Urolithiasis group. World J Urol 2022; 40:1265-1266. [PMID: 34787701 PMCID: PMC8595956 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03883-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|