1
|
Chappidi MR, Lin DW, Westphalen AC. Role of MRI in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2025; 46:31-44. [PMID: 39608681 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2024.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the management of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance. In this review, we will explore the incorporation of MRI into active surveillance protocols, detailing its impact on clinical decision-making and patient management and discussing how it aligns with current guidelines and practice patterns. The role of MRI in this patient population continues to evolve over time, and we will discuss some of the recent advancements in the field and highlight potential areas for future research endeavors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera R Chappidi
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| | - Antonio C Westphalen
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stranne J. 2023/2024 update of the national prostate cancer guidelines in Sweden. Scand J Urol 2024; 59:210-211. [PMID: 39714048 DOI: 10.2340/sju.v59.42656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Campbell RA, Wood A, Schwen Z, Ward R, Weight C, Purysko AS. MRI and active surveillance: thoughts from across the pond. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10866-6. [PMID: 39266769 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10866-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
In the United States (US), urological guidelines recommend active surveillance (AS) for patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and endorse it as an option for those with favorable intermediate-risk PCa with a > 10-year life expectancy. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is being increasingly used in the screening, monitoring, and staging of PCa and involves the combination of T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. The American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines provide recommendations about the use of mpMRI in the confirmatory setting for AS patients but do not discuss the timing of follow-up mpMRI in AS. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) discourages using it more frequently than every 12 months. Finally, guidelines state that mpMRI can be used to augment risk stratification but should not replace periodic surveillance biopsy. In this review, we discuss the current literature regarding the use of mpMRI for patients with AS, with a particular focus on the approach in the US. Although AS shows a benefit to the addition of mpMRI to diagnostic, confirmatory, and follow-up biopsy, there is no strong evidence to suggest that mpMRI can safely replace biopsy for most patients and thus it must be incorporated into a multimodal approach. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: According to the US guidelines, regular follow-ups are important for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance, and prostate MRI is a valuable tool that should be utilized, in combination with PSA kinetics and biopsies, for monitoring prostate cancer. KEY POINTS: According to the US guidelines, the addition of MRI improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Timing interval imaging of patients on active surveillance remains unclear and has not been specifically addressed. MRI should trigger further work-ups, but not replace periodic follow-up biopsies, in men on active surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Campbell
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew Wood
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zeyad Schwen
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ryan Ward
- Abdominal Imaging Section, Diagnostics Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Christopher Weight
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrei S Purysko
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Abdominal Imaging Section, Diagnostics Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Erdmann K, Distler F, Gräfe S, Kwe J, Erb HHH, Fuessel S, Pahernik S, Thomas C, Borkowetz A. Transcript Markers from Urinary Extracellular Vesicles for Predicting Risk Reclassification of Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2453. [PMID: 39001515 PMCID: PMC11240337 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), its derivatives, and magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) lack sufficient specificity and sensitivity for the prediction of risk reclassification of prostate cancer (PCa) patients on active surveillance (AS). We investigated selected transcripts in urinary extracellular vesicles (uEV) from PCa patients on AS to predict PCa risk reclassification (defined by ISUP 1 with PSA > 10 ng/mL or ISUP 2-5 with any PSA level) in control biopsy. Before the control biopsy, urine samples were prospectively collected from 72 patients, of whom 43% were reclassified during AS. Following RNA isolation from uEV, multiplexed reverse transcription, and pre-amplification, 29 PCa-associated transcripts were quantified by quantitative PCR. The predictive ability of the transcripts to indicate PCa risk reclassification was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses via calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) and was then compared to clinical parameters followed by multivariate regression analysis. ROC curve analyses revealed a predictive potential for AMACR, HPN, MALAT1, PCA3, and PCAT29 (AUC = 0.614-0.655, p < 0.1). PSA, PSA density, PSA velocity, and MRI maxPI-RADS showed AUC values of 0.681-0.747 (p < 0.05), with accuracies for indicating a PCa risk reclassification of 64-68%. A model including AMACR, MALAT1, PCAT29, PSA density, and MRI maxPI-RADS resulted in an AUC of 0.867 (p < 0.001) with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 87%, 83%, and 85%, respectively, thus surpassing the predictive power of the individual markers. These findings highlight the potential of uEV transcripts in combination with clinical parameters as monitoring markers during the AS of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kati Erdmann
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (K.E.); (S.G.); (J.K.); (H.H.H.E.); (C.T.); (A.B.)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Distler
- Department of Urology, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany; (F.D.); (S.P.)
| | - Sebastian Gräfe
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (K.E.); (S.G.); (J.K.); (H.H.H.E.); (C.T.); (A.B.)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Jeremy Kwe
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (K.E.); (S.G.); (J.K.); (H.H.H.E.); (C.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Holger H. H. Erb
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (K.E.); (S.G.); (J.K.); (H.H.H.E.); (C.T.); (A.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Fuessel
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (K.E.); (S.G.); (J.K.); (H.H.H.E.); (C.T.); (A.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sascha Pahernik
- Department of Urology, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany; (F.D.); (S.P.)
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (K.E.); (S.G.); (J.K.); (H.H.H.E.); (C.T.); (A.B.)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (K.E.); (S.G.); (J.K.); (H.H.H.E.); (C.T.); (A.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Greenberg JW, Koller CR, Lightfoot C, Brinkley GJ, Leinwand G, Wang J, Krane LS. Annual mpMRI surveillance: PI-RADS upgrading and increasing trend correlated with patients who harbor clinically significant disease. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:158.e11-158.e16. [PMID: 38365461 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer screening has routinely identified men with very low- or low-risk disease, per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Current literature has demonstrated that the most appropriate management strategy for these patients is active surveillance (AS). The mainstay of AS includes periodic biopsies and biannual prostate-specific antigen tests. However, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is uniquely posed to improve patient surveillance. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of an annual mpMRI in patients on AS, focusing on radiologic upgrading and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) trends as indicators of clinically significant disease. METHODS This prospective, single intuition, study enrolled 208 patients on AS who had at least two biopsies and 1 mpMRI with a median follow-up of 5.03 years. The main outcome variable was time to Gleason grade (GG) reclassification. RESULTS After delineating patients on their initial PI-RADS score, men with score 3 and 5 lesions at first MRI had comparable GG reclassification-free survival to their counterparts. Conversely, men with initial PI-RADS 4 lesions showed a lower 5-year GG reclassification-free survival compared to those with PI-RADS score 1-2. The cohort was then subset to 70 patients who obtained ≥2 mpMRIs on protocol. Men experiencing uptrending mpMRI scores had an increased risk of GG reclassification, with a 35.4% difference in 5 year GG reclassification-free survival probability on the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. CONCLUSION In conclusion, this study demonstrates that for men on AS with stable recapitulated disease, an annual MRI may replace repeat biopsies after confirmatory sampling has been obtained. On the other hand, men who initiate AS with PI-RADS 4 and/or who display uptrending mpMRI scores require periodic biopsies along with repeat imaging. This study highlights the utility of integrating an annual MRI into AS protocols, thus promising a more effective approach to management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob W Greenberg
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | | | - Christine Lightfoot
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | - Garrett J Brinkley
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
| | - Gabriel Leinwand
- Department of Urology, Southeastern Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, LA
| | - Julie Wang
- Department of Urology, Southeastern Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, LA
| | - L Spencer Krane
- Department of Urology, Southeastern Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, LA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Alessi S, Piccinelli M, Marvaso G, Giudice AL, Nizzardo M, Cozzi G, Fontana M, Corrao G, Ferro M, Tian Z, Karakiewicz PI, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Petralia G, de Cobelli O, Musi G. Conditional survival of patients with low-risk prostate cancer: Temporal changes in active surveillance permanence over time. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:323.e1-323.e8. [PMID: 37211449 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine risk categories for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) in active surveillance (AS) and to test the conditional survival (CS) that examined the effect of event-free survival since AS-entrance. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2012 to December 2020 we analyzed 606 patients with PCa enrolled in our AS program. Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots depicted AS-exit rate. Multivariable Cox regression models (MCRMs) tested for AS-exit rate independent predictors to determine risk categories. CS estimates were used to calculate overall AS-exit rate after event-free survival intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, and after stratification according to risk categories. RESULTS At MCRMs PSAd ≥ 0.15 (HR: 1.43; P-value 0.04), PI-RADS 4-5 (HR: 2.56; P-value <0.001) and number of biopsy positive cores ≥ 2 (HR: 1.75; P-value <0.001) were independent predictors of AS-exit. These variables were used to determine risk categories: low-, intermediate- and high-risk. Overall, according to CS-analyses, 5-year AS-exit free rate increased from 59.7% at baseline, to 67.3%, 74.7%, and 89.4% in patients who remained in AS respectively ≥1, ≥2, ≥3 and ≥5 years. After stratification according to risk categories, in those patients who remained in AS ≥ 5 years, 5-year AS-exit free rates increased from 76.3% to 100% in patients with a low-risk, from 62.7% to 83.7% in patients with an intermediate-risk and from 42.3% to 87.5% in patients with a high-risk. CONCLUSIONS CS models showed a direct relationship between event-free survival duration and subsequent AS permanence in overall PCa patients and after stratification according to risk categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco A Mistretta
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sarah Alessi
- Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Piccinelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Lo Giudice
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Nizzardo
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Cozzi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Fontana
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Division of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bangma CH, Schoots IG. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Monitoring in Active Surveillance: Are We Ready To Jump on the Bandwagon? EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 38:49-51. [PMID: 35243399 PMCID: PMC8885465 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chris H. Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G. Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|