1
|
Geboers B, Meijer D, Counter W, Blazevski A, Thompson J, Doan P, Gondoputro W, Katelaris A, Haynes AM, Delprado W, O'Neill G, Yuen C, Vis AN, van Leeuwen PJ, Ho B, Liu V, Lee J, Donswijk ML, Oprea-Lager D, Scheltema MJ, Emmett L, Stricker PD. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in addition to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and biopsies to select prostate cancer patients for focal therapy. BJU Int 2024; 133 Suppl 4:14-22. [PMID: 37858931 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the additional value of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) to conventional diagnostic tools to select patients for hemi-ablative focal therapy (FT). PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis on a multicentre cohort (private and institutional) of 138 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), PSMA-PET, and systematic biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy between January 2011 and July 2021. Patients were eligible when they met the consensus criteria for FT: PSA <15 ng/mL, clinical/radiological T stage ≤T2b, and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2-3. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as ISUP grade ≥2, extracapsular extension >0.5 mm or seminal vesicle involvement at final histopathology. The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI, systematic biopsies and PSMA-PET for csPCa (separate and combined) was calculated within a four-quadrant prostate model by receiver-operating characteristic and 2 × 2 contingency analysis. Additionally, we assessed whether the diagnostic tools correctly identified patients suitable for hemi-ablative FT. RESULTS In total 552 prostate quadrants were analysed and 272 (49%) contained csPCa on final histopathology. The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for csPCa were 0.79, 75%, 83%, 81% and 77%, respectively, for combined mpMRI and systematic biopsies, and improved after addition of PSMA-PET to 0.84, 87%, 80%, 81% and 86%, respectively (P < 0.001). On final histopathology 46/138 patients (33%) were not suitable for hemi-ablative FT. Addition of PSMA-PET correctly identified 26/46 (57%) non-suitable patients and resulted in 4/138 (3%) false-positive exclusions. CONCLUSIONS Addition of PSMA-PET to the conventional work-up by mpMRI and systematic biopsies could improve selection for hemi-ablative FT and guide exclusion of patients for whom whole-gland treatments might be a more suitable treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Geboers
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (location VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennie Meijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC (location VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William Counter
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexandar Blazevski
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James Thompson
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Urology, St. George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Doan
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - William Gondoputro
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Athos Katelaris
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne-Maree Haynes
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Gordon O'Neill
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Hospital and Private Clinic, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carlo Yuen
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Hospital and Private Clinic, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andre N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC (location VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bao Ho
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Victor Liu
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan Lee
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (location VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs J Scheltema
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC (location VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phillip D Stricker
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Hospital and Private Clinic, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramalingam V, McCarthy CJ, Degerstedt S, Ahmed M. Image-Guided Prostate Cryoablation: State-of-the-Art. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1589. [PMID: 37763708 PMCID: PMC10535457 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Image-guided focal therapy has increased in popularity as a treatment option for patients with primary and locally recurrent prostate cancer. This review will cover the basic indications, evaluation, treatment algorithm, and follow-up for patients undergoing image-guided ablation of the prostate. Additionally, this paper will serve as an overview of some technical approaches to cases so that physicians can familiarize themselves with working in this space. While the focus of this paper is prostate cryoablation, readers will obtain a basic literature overview of some of the additional available image-guided treatment modalities for focal prostate therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Ramalingam
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Deaconess Rd, Rosenburg 3, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (C.J.M.); (S.D.); (M.A.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Campana LG, Daud A, Lancellotti F, Arroyo JP, Davalos RV, Di Prata C, Gehl J. Pulsed Electric Fields in Oncology: A Snapshot of Current Clinical Practices and Research Directions from the 4th World Congress of Electroporation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3340. [PMID: 37444450 PMCID: PMC10340685 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The 4th World Congress of Electroporation (Copenhagen, 9-13 October 2022) provided a unique opportunity to convene leading experts in pulsed electric fields (PEF). PEF-based therapies harness electric fields to produce therapeutically useful effects on cancers and represent a valuable option for a variety of patients. As such, irreversible electroporation (IRE), gene electrotransfer (GET), electrochemotherapy (ECT), calcium electroporation (Ca-EP), and tumour-treating fields (TTF) are on the rise. Still, their full therapeutic potential remains underappreciated, and the field faces fragmentation, as shown by parallel maturation and differences in the stages of development and regulatory approval worldwide. This narrative review provides a glimpse of PEF-based techniques, including key mechanisms, clinical indications, and advances in therapy; finally, it offers insights into current research directions. By highlighting a common ground, the authors aim to break silos, strengthen cross-functional collaboration, and pave the way to novel possibilities for intervention. Intriguingly, beyond their peculiar mechanism of action, PEF-based therapies share technical interconnections and multifaceted biological effects (e.g., vascular, immunological) worth exploiting in combinatorial strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca G. Campana
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9WL, UK;
| | - Adil Daud
- Department of Medicine, University of California, 550 16 Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA;
| | - Francesco Lancellotti
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9WL, UK;
| | - Julio P. Arroyo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA; (J.P.A.); (R.V.D.)
| | - Rafael V. Davalos
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA; (J.P.A.); (R.V.D.)
- Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
| | - Claudia Di Prata
- Department of Surgery, San Martino Hospital, 32100 Belluno, Italy;
| | - Julie Gehl
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|