Circulating endothelial cells and tumor blood volume as predictors in lung cancer

Advances in Predictive Biomarkers for Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study aimed to explore advances in biomarkers related to anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), thereby enhancing treatment selection, advancing personalized and precision medicine to improve treatment outcomes and patient survival rates. This article reviews key discoveries in predictive biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy in NSCLC in recent years, such as (1) liquid biopsy predictive biomarkers: studies have identified activated circulating endothelial cells (aCECs) via liquid biopsy as potential predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy; (2) imaging biomarkers: advanced imaging technologies, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced integrated magnetic resonance positron emission tomography (MR-PET), are used to assess tumor angiogenesis in patients with NSCLC and evaluate the clinical efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs; (3) genetic predictive biomarkers: research has explored polymorphisms of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 (VEGFR-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), as well as how plasma levels of VEGF-A can predict the outcomes and prognosis of patients with non-squamous NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Despite progress in identifying biomarkers related to anti-angiogenic therapy, several challenges remain, including limitations in clinical trials, heterogeneity in NSCLC, and technical hurdles. Future research will require extensive clinical validation and in-depth mechanistic studies to fully exploit the potential of these biomarkers for personalized treatment.

Bevacizumab promotes active biological behaviors of human umbilical vein endothelial cells by activating TGFβ1 pathways off-VEGF signaling

Objective: Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with clear clinical benefits. However, overall survival of some cancer types remains low owing to resistance to bevacizumab therapy. While resistance is commonly ascribed to tumor cell invasion induced by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), less attention has been paid to the potential involvement of endothelial cells (ECs) in vasculature activated by anti-angiogenic drugs.

Methods: Human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs), bEnd.3 cells, and mouse retinal microvascular ECs (MRMECs) were treated with bevacizumab under conditions of hypoxia and effects on biological behaviors, such as migration and tube formation, examined. Regulatory effects on TGFβ1 and CD105 (endoglin) were established via determination of protein and mRNA levels. We further investigated whether the effects of bevacizumab could be reversed using the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib.

Results: Bevacizumab upregulated TGFβ1 as well as CD105, a component of the TGFβ receptor complex and an angiogenesis promoter. Elevated CD105 induced activation of Smad1/5, the inflammatory pathway and endothelial–mesenchymal transition. The migration ability of HUVECs was enhanced by bevacizumab under hypoxia. Upregulation of CD105 was abrogated by anlotinib, which targets multiple receptor tyrosine kinases including VEGFR2/3, FGFR1-4, PDGFRα/β, C-Kit, and RET.

Conclusions: Bevacizumab promotes migration and tube formation of HUVECs via activation of the TGFβ1 pathway and upregulation of CD105 expression. Anlotinib reverses the effects of bevacizumab by inhibiting the above signals.

CD44+ Circulating Tumor Endothelial Cells Indicate Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Radical Surgery: A Pilot Study

Background

Circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) are cells that originate from tumor endothelial cells (TECs) of blood vessels and are shed into peripheral blood. Some studies have shown that CTECs are associated with tumor angiogenesis, growth and indicate prognosis in patients with malignant solid tumor. However, the role of CTECs especially the phenotype of CTECs in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still not clear. We investigated the relationship between CTECs and patients’ prognosis.

Methods

A total of 73 patients with resectable PDAC were enrolled in our research and underwent radical surgery. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected before surgery, on postoperative day (POD) 7 and on postoperative month (POM) 1, respectively. We used integrated subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH) platform to identify and enumerate CTECs. Immunofluorescence was used to identify CTECs expressing CD44 and vimentin.

Results

In patients with early tumor recurrence (DFS< 6 months), the preoperative CD44+ CTEC levels showed significantly higher (P = 0.023). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that history of diabetes [HR 2.656 (1.194–5.908), P = 0.017], numbers of positive lymph nodes [HR 1.871 (1.388–2.522), P < 0.001], preoperative numbers of CD44+ CTECs [HR 1.216 (1.064–1.390), P = 0.004], and POM1 CA19-9 level [HR 1.002 (1.001–1.002), P < 0.001] were independent prognostic factors for DFS.

Conclusion

The detection of CD44+CTECs in patients with resectable PDAC preoperatively could be an independent predictor of shorter DFS after radical surgery.

[Research Progress of Small Molecule Anti-angiogenic Drugs in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

肺癌是世界上发病率最高的癌症之一，且尚无二线进展后的标准治疗方案，而肿瘤血管生成目前已被确定为恶性肿瘤的重要治疗靶点，小分子多靶点血管激酶抑制剂可通过抑制血管生成相关信号通路，抑制肿瘤血管的生成。目前已开展多项小分子抗血管生成药物治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床试验，且已有部分血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂（vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, VEGFR-TKIs）获批治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌，本文基于国内外多项小分子抗血管生成药物治疗非小细胞肺癌的发展现状，归纳了多个VEGFR-TKIs及成纤维细胞生长因子受体（fibroblast growth factor receptor, FGFR）-TKI单药或联合[包括分别与化疗、表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）-TKIs、免疫治疗、放疗等联合）]治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效与安全性研究，同时探讨了VEGFR-TKIs可能存在的耐药机制及疗效预测指标等，并对未来抗血管治疗非小细胞肺癌的发展趋势以及存在的潜在问题进行展望，同时为肺癌后续的精准治疗及个体化治疗提供新的思路。

The Blood Circulating Rare Cell Population. What is it and What is it Good For?

Blood contains a diverse cell population of low concentration hematopoietic as well as non-hematopoietic cells. The majority of such rare cells may be bone marrow-derived progenitor and stem cells. This paucity of circulating rare cells, in particular in the peripheral circulation, has led many to believe that bone marrow as well as other organ-related cell egress into the circulation is a response to pathological conditions. Little is known about this, though an increasing body of literature can be found suggesting commonness of certain rare cell types in the peripheral blood under physiological conditions. Thus, the isolation and detection of circulating rare cells appears to be merely a technological problem. Knowledge about rare cell types that may circulate the blood stream will help to advance the field of cell-based liquid biopsy by supporting inter-platform comparability, making use of biological correct cutoffs and “mining” new biomarkers and combinations thereof in clinical diagnosis and therapy. Therefore, this review intends to lay ground for a comprehensive analysis of the peripheral blood rare cell population given the necessity to target a broader range of cell types for improved biomarker performance in cell-based liquid biopsy.

Circulating endothelial cells and microparticles as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

It has been proposed that circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and microparticles (MPs) may be useful for the assessment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about the potential clinical relevance of these biomarkers in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Therefore, we investigated the utility of baseline levels of CECs and MPs in SCLC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An immunomagnetic separation (IMS) technique was used to isolate and quantify CECs in the peripheral blood, while plasma samples were analyzed using flow cytometry for the measurement of circulating MPs.

RESULTS

We prospectively collected data from 56 patients and 41 healthy individuals. Forty-three patients presented at initial diagnosis and 13 patients presented at relapse. Baseline levels of CECs and MPs were significantly higher in SCLC patients either at initial diagnosis or at relapse than in healthy subjects (p < 0.0002 and p < 0.007, respectively). However, estimated tumor volume (ETV) was significantly correlated with basal MP values (p < 0.0001) but not with pretreatment CECs (p =  0.57). The amount of baseline CECs and MPs was significantly lower in patients with an objective response (OR, n = 23) than in those with progressive disease (PD, n = 15) after treatment (p =  0.016 and 0.05, respectively). With cut-off values of 110 cells/mL for CECs and 1257 events/μL for MPs according to receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, baseline levels of these biomarkers were not significantly correlated with either progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). However, patients with 6-month PFS displayed significantly decreased pretreatment CEC counts (p =  0.042), whereas basal MP values significantly increased in 1-year survivors compared with those in non-survivors (p =  0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that baseline CECs and MPs may be predictive biomarkers of tumor response and long-term survival in SCLC patients.

CD31-labeled circulating endothelial cells as predictor in anlotinib-treated non-small-cell lung cancer: Analysis on ALTER-0303 study

Our previous studies revealed that the level of activated circulating endothelial cells (aCECs) was correlated with the progression‐free survival (PFS) in antiangiogenesis therapy. Anlotinib displayed affirmatory efficacies in several clinical trials of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To find a marker predicting the efficacy of anlotinib treatment, we investigated the correlations of aCECs with PFS and overall survival (OS) in patients with NSCLC treated with anlotinib and the impact of anlotinib on human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs). The blood samples of 78 patients with NSCLC were collected. aCECs were identified by flow cytometry as CD45⁻/CD146⁺/CD31⁺ cells and CD45⁻/CD146⁺/CD105⁺ cells. The mean value of baseline aCECs counts was defined as the cutoff value, according to which patients were divided into high and low baseline groups. Statistical correlation between high baseline CD31‐labeled aCECs counts and number of metastatic lesions (>3) (χ² = 4.905, P = .027) was analyzed. The 49 patients treated with anlotinib were stratified according to the ratio of minimal aCECs counts at any time points to baseline (aCECs min/baseline) as <1 or ≥1. Interestingly, the patients with aCECs (CD31) min/baseline <1 displayed longer PFS [HR = 0.439, 95%CI (0.211‐0.912), P = .023]. The biological effect of anlotinib on HUVECs was investigated using MTT assays. Western blot analysis was conducted to evaluate the expression levels of CD31 and CD105 under anlotinib treatment and the underlying mechanisms. In vitro experiment data demonstrated that CD31 exhibited more sensitive changes than CD105 under anlotinib treatment through PI3K‐AKT pathway. Thus, our finding provides new insights into the mechanism by which the CD31‐labeled aCECs are a more sensitive marker for predicting the efficiency of anlotinib treatment.

Current Status and Study Progress of Recombinant Human Endostatin in Cancer Treatment

Angiogenesis plays fundamentally critical roles in solid-tumor pathogenesis, growth, invasion and metastasis. Endostatin, one of the most potent anti-angiogenic factors, was first isolated in Folkman's lab in 1997, and was reported to dramatically shrink tumor blood formation. But its insoluble and unstable nature coupled with the high cost of synthesizing the endostatin protein doomed it for clinical cancer treatment. Intrigued by Folkman's pioneering discoveries, Chinese scientists found a way to refold the protein, making it cost-effective to manufacture a recombinant human endostatin, a soluble and stable form of endostatin. A number of clinical studies have demonstrated the significant survival benefit of rh-endostatin in treating late stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and, as a result, rh-endostatin (Endostar®) was approved by the State Food and Drug Administration of China (CFDA) in September of 2005 as a treatment option for NSCLC. Since then, increasing bodies of clinical data and experience have been obtained from a variety of other different cancers, such as small cell lung cancer, NSCLC in other settings, including malignant serous effusion, melanoma, colon cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, nasopharyngeal cancers, and others. This review aims at summarizing current clinical data of rh-endostatin including its survival benefits, optimized dosages, routes of administration, recommended duration and frequency of treatment, predictive biomarkers, and its safety profile in lung cancers as well as other cancers.

Circulating endothelial cells and their subsets: novel biomarkers for cancer

Angiogenesis contributes to the growth of solid tumors. Antiangiogenic agents are widely used in various cancers and considerable efforts have been made in the development of novel biomarkers that can predict the outcome of an anticancer treatment. Of those, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and their subsets constitute a surrogate tool for monitoring disease activity. However, owing to the lack of standardization on the phenotypes and detection of CECs and their subsets, results have always been inconsistent and uninterpretable. In this review, we focus on the biological characteristics in terms of physiology, phenotypes and detection of CECs along with their subsets; review the current scenario of CEC enumeration as a surrogate biomarker in clinical oncology; and explore their future potential applications.

Assessing Tumor Response to Treatment in Patients with Lung Cancer Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT

The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the literature available on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) as a tool to evaluate treatment response in patients with lung cancer. This systematic review was compiled according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only original research articles concerning treatment response in patients with lung cancer assessed with DCE-CT were included. To assess the validity of each study we implemented Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). The initial search yielded 651 publications, and 16 articles were included in this study. The articles were divided into groups of treatment. In studies where patients were treated with systemic chemotherapy with or without anti-angiogenic drugs, four out of the seven studies found a significant decrease in permeability after treatment. Four out of five studies that measured blood flow post anti-angiogenic treatments found that blood flow was significantly decreased. DCE-CT may be a useful tool in assessing treatment response in patients with lung cancer. It seems that particularly permeability and blood flow are important perfusion values for predicting treatment outcome. However, the heterogeneity in scan protocols, scan parameters, and time between scans makes it difficult to compare the included studies.

Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have been indicated as a potential biomarker of vascular damage in a variety of cancers. Several studies have revealed CECs may reflect the extent of tumor angiogenesis; however, the role of CECs in the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is undetermined to date. A meta-analysis has been prepared to determine whether the base level of CECs and the changes of CECs after therapy (∆CECs: post-therapeutic value minus the pre- therapeutic value) could be considered as a prognostic tool for patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

Systematic reviews of studies published before April 30 2015 were conducted on the association between the levels of CECs or ∆CECs and the prognosis of NSCLC in several data bases. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to collate the data. Similarly, heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies, containing eight prospective studies and one retrospective study, involving 515 patients was identified. Patients with higher level of CECs counts at baseline were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.529-0.891). ∆CECs could also be considered a prognostic indicator in NSCLC patients (HR 0.575, 95% CI: 0.401-0.75). The former and the later are without a significant heterogeneity in the data (I(2)=21.2% and 0.0%, P=0.274 and 0.870, respectively). However, there was no correlation between the base level of CECs and the overall survival (OS) (HR 0.914, 95% CI: 0.560-1.267, I(2)=43.6%, P=0.150).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher levels of CECs counts at baseline and the ensuing decrease after therapy demonstrated a positive correlation with longer PFS in NSCLC patients. But this phenomenon has not been found in OS. From a certain perspective, CECs counts and ∆CECs could be potential prognostic indicators for NSCLC patients.

Circulating endothelial cells for evaluation of tumor response in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) reflect the neovascularization in the tumor mass. We therefore investigated the potential role of CEC kinetics after first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 45 healthy subjects and 51 naïve patients with advanced NSCLC. Quantification of CD146+ CECs was performed using immunomagnetic separation (IMS).

RESULTS

Pretreatment and posttreatment CEC levels in NSCLC patients were significantly higher than in healthy subjects (p&lt;0.0001). An objective response was achieved after chemotherapy with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) in 26 patients, whereas the remaining 25 patients had progressive disease (PD). Baseline CEC levels were significantly higher in PR/SD patients than in PD patients (p = 0.039). After chemotherapy, CEC count significantly decreased in PR/SD patients (p = 0.014) and increased in patients with PD (p = 0.019). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the percentage change of CEC counts between the 2 groups (p = 0.0016). No significant difference in the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) was observed between patients with high baseline CEC counts and those with low baseline CEC levels. However, patients with high percentage change in CEC count had longer OS than those with low percentage change after chemotherapy (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in CEC counts after chemotherapy reflect tumor response in advanced NSCLC patients. Moreover, high percentage changes in CEC counts after chemotherapy may predict longer OS in advanced NSCLC. High baseline CEC levels might be an indicator of tumor response in advanced NSCLC patients after first-line chemotherapy.

Meta-Analysis of Circulating Endothelial Cells and Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells as Prognostic Factors in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic implications of pretreatment circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPCs) for the survival of patients with lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relevant literature was identified using Medline and EMBASE. Patient clinical characteristics, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) together with CEC and CEPC positive rates before treatment were extracted. STATA 12.0 was used for our analysis and assessment of publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles (8 for CEC and 5 for CEPC, n=595 and n=244) were pooled for the global meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) for OS predicted by pretreatment CECs was 1.641 [0.967, 2.786], while the OR for PFS was 1.168 [0.649, 2.100]. The OR for OS predicted by pretreatment CEPCs was 12.673 [5.274, 30.450], while the OR for PFS was 4.930 [0.931, 26.096]. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to clinical staging. Odds ratio (OR) showed the high level of pretreatment CECs only correlated with the OS of patients with advanced lung cancer (stage III-IV).

CONCLUSIONS

High counts of CECs seem to be associated only with worse 1-year OS in patients with lung cancer, while high level of pretreatment CEPCs correlate with both worse PFS and OS.

Acute vascular response to cediranib treatment in human non-small-cell lung cancer xenografts with different tumour stromal architecture

•

We studied cediranib, a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor in lung cancer xenografts.

•

Gadolinium-enhanced DCE-MRI was used to study acute vascular responses.

•

Acute vascular response was associated with tumour stromal architecture.

•

Tumour growth inhibition by cediranib was linked to acute vascular response.

•

Acute vascular changes are a potential predictive marker of response to cediranib.

Objectives

Tumours can be categorised based on their stromal architecture into tumour vessel and stromal vessel phenotypes, and the phenotypes have been suggested to define tumour response to chronic treatment with a VEGFR2 antibody. However, it is unclear whether the vascular phenotypes of tumours associate with acute vascular response to VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), or whether the early changes in vascular function are associated with subsequent changes in tumour size. This study was sought to address these questions by using xenograft models of human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing stromal vessel phenotype (Calu-3) and tumour vessel phenotype (Calu-6), respectively.

Methods

For dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), nude mice bearing established Calu-3 or Calu-6 xenografts were treated with a potent pan-VEGFR TKI, cediranib (6 mg/kg), at 0 h and 22 h. DCE-MRI was performed 2 h before the first dose and 2 h after the second dose of cediranib to examine acute changes in tumour vessel perfusion. Tumours were harvested for hypoxia detection by CA9 immunohistochemistry. For tumour growth study, mice carrying established Calu-3 or Calu-6 tumours were treated with cediranib once daily for 5 days.

Results

Twenty-four hours after cediranib administration, the perfusion of Calu-3 tumours was markedly reduced, with a significant increase in hypoxia. In contrast, neither perfusion nor hypoxia was significantly affected in Calu-6 tumours. Tumour regressions were induced in Calu-3 xenografts, but not in Calu-6 xenografts, although there was a trend towards tumour growth inhibition after 5 days of cediranib treatment.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that tumour stromal architecture may associate with acute tumour vascular response to VEGFR TKI, and this acute tumour vascular response may be a promising early predictive marker of response to VEGFR TKI in NSCLC.

Circulating endothelial cells as a biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer patients: correlation with clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have been proposed as a biomarker for the assessment of patients with solid tumors. However, few data are available in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We therefore analyzed the clinical significance of CECs in newly diagnosed NSCLC patients. In addition, we tried to determine the prognostic value of CECs in NSCLC.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 151 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients and 25 healthy volunteers were included. Furthermore, 25 patients with a partial response (n=15) or stable disease (n=10) after treatment were evaluated at recurrence with a mean follow-up of 117 days (range: 47-364 days). CECs were counted using magnetic beads coupled to a specific antibody against CD146.

RESULTS

The pre-treatment CEC count was significantly higher in patients with all histological subtypes of NSCLC than in healthy volunteers (p&lt;0.0001). High baseline CEC counts were significantly correlated with advanced clinical stages (p=0.026), weight loss (p=0.03), and poorly differentiated NSCLC (p=0.02). The amount of CECs increased significantly at recurrence compared with their amount after treatment in 20/21 assessable patients (p=0.0001). Nevertheless, there was no significant correlation between baseline CEC count and median duration of progression-free survival (p=0.402).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased CEC counts were present in patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC compared with healthy subjects. Elevated levels of baseline CECs correlated with high-risk factors in NSCLC. In addition, increased CEC count during follow-up seems to be correlated with recurrence in NSCLC patients.

Predictive and prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with standard chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Monitoring circulating endothelial cells (CECs) count reflects the tumor vasculature in cancer patients and might be a predictor of response to chemotherapy. We therefore investigated the clinical significance of changes in CECs count after three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Peripheral blood samples were collected from 89 naive NSCLC patients at diagnosis and after chemotherapy. The CECs were quantified by an immuno-magnetic technique and fluorescent microscopy. After chemotherapy, patients were assessed according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors as partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or progression disease (PD).

RESULTS

Baseline CECs levels were significantly higher in PR patients (n = 62) than those in patients with SD/PD (n = 27) (p = 0.0007). Although there was no significant correlation between baseline CECs levels and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.287), patients with high percentage change in CECs count after chemotherapy had significantly longer PFS than those with low percentage change (p = 0.048). Regarding treatment efficacy, CECs count significantly decreased after chemotherapy in comparison with CECs count at baseline in patients with PR (p < 0.0001). By contrast, CECs levels after chemotherapy were significantly higher than those at diagnosis in patients with PD (p = 0.002). Moreover, there was no significant change between pre- and post-treatment CECs amount in patients with SD (p = 0.681).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline CECs levels might be an early predictive biomarker for treatment efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients. Our results suggest the change in CECs count after chemotherapy as a prognostic factor for tumor response and PFS in NSCLC.

Clinical value of circulating endothelial cells and of soluble CD146 levels in patients undergoing surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

Background:

Previous studies indicate that endothelial injury, as demonstrated by the presence of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), may predict clinical outcome in cancer patients. In addition, soluble CD146 (sCD146) may reflect activation of angiogenesis. However, no study has investigated their combined clinical value in patients undergoing resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods:

Data were collected from preoperative blood samples from 74 patients who underwent resection for NSCLC. Circulating endothelial cells were defined, using the CellSearch Assay, as CD146+CD105+CD45−DAPI+. In parallel, sCD146 was quantified using an ELISA immunoassay. These experiments were also performed on a group of 20 patients with small-cell lung cancer, 60 healthy individuals and 23 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Results:

The CEC count and the plasma level of sCD146 were significantly higher in NSCLC patients than in the sub-groups of controls (P<0.001). Moreover, an increased CEC count was associated with higher levels of sCD146 (P=0.010). Both high CEC count and high sCD146 plasma level at baseline significantly correlated with shorter progression-free survival (P<0.001, respectively) and overall survival (P=0.005; P=0.009) of NSCLC patients.

Conclusions:

The present study provides supportive evidence to show that both a high CEC count and a high sCD146 level at baseline correlate with poor prognosis and may be useful for the prediction of clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC.

Tumor vascularity in prostate cancer: an update on circulating endothelial cells and platelets as noninvasive biomarkers

In order to individually tailor prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, clinicians need better tools to predict prognosis and treatment response. Given the relationship between angiogenesis and cancer progression, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and their progenitors have logically been proposed as potential biomarkers. The utility of their baseline levels and kinetics has been investigated for years. However, owing to a lack of standardization and validation of CEC and circulating endothelial progenitors enumeration protocols, results have been inconsistent in prostate and other cancers. Similarly, platelets play a significant part in cancer progression, yet the role of platelet-related biomarkers in PCa is unclear. While there have been a number of theoretically interesting platelet-related markers proposed, limited research has been conducted in PCa patients. Currently, CECs and platelets do not have a clear role as biomarkers in routine PCa care. Given the theoretical merits of these cells, prospective trials are warranted.

Circulating endothelial cells and tumor blood volume as predictors in lung cancer

The current criteria for evaluating antiangiogenic efficacy is insufficient as tumor shrinkage occurs after blood perfusion decreases. Tumor blood volume (BV) in computed tomography perfusion imaging and circulating endothelial cells (CEC) might predict the status of angiogenesis. The present study aimed to validate their representation as feasible predictors in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). A total of 74 patients was categorized randomly into two arms undergoing regimens of vinorelbine and cisplatin (Navelbine and platinum [NP]) with rh-endostatin or single NP. The response rate, perfusion imaging indexes and activated CEC (aCEC) during treatment were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined through follow up. Correlations among the above indicators, response and PFS were analyzed: aCEC increased significantly in cases of progressive disease after single NP chemotherapy (P = 0.024). Tumor BV decreased significantly in cases with a clinical benefit in the combined arm (P = 0.026), whereas inverse correlations existed between ∆aCEC (post-therapeutic value minus the pre-therapeutic value) and PFS (P = 0.005) and between ∆BV and PFS (P = 0.044); a positive correlation existed between ∆aCEC and ∆BV. Therefore, both aCEC and tumor BV can serve as predictors, and detection of both indicators can help evaluate the chemo-antiangiogenic efficacy in NSCLC more accurately.