Pembrolizumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Subgroup analysis from the KEYNOTE-100

How Progesterone Receptor Expression Impacts Platinum Sensitivity in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: Insights from Clinical and Experimental Perspectives

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is often considered a relatively platinum-resistant malignancy. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of progesterone receptor (PR) expression levels on platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes in people with OCCC. A retrospective analysis was conducted with 80 people with OCCC who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. PR expression was assessed via immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and quantified using the H score. The platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes of patients with weak and strong PR expression were compared. Additionally, cisplatin viability and migration experiments were conducted with OCCC cell lines (ES-2 and TOV-21G) with varying PR isoform expressions. Among the 80 patients, 62 were classified as having platinum-sensitive disease, while 18 had platinum-resistant disease. The mean total PR H- score of platinum-sensitive tumors was significantly higher than that of platinum-resistant tumors (p = 0.002). Although no significant differences in progression-free and overall survival were observed between patients with high and low PR expression, those with high PR expression tended to have longer survival. While PR protein was only weakly detectable in ES-2 and TOV-21G cells, a transfection of the PR-A or PR-B gene resulted in a strong expression of PR-A or PR-B, which led to significantly reduced proliferation and migration in ES-2 and TOV-21G cells. Furthermore, overexpression of PR-A or PR-B enhanced cisplatin cytotoxicity in these cell lines. In conclusion, strong PR expression was associated with improved platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes, consistent with our experimental findings. The potential of PR as a tumor sensitizer to cisplatin in OCCC warrants further investigation.

Prognostic impact of suspicious extraabdominal lymph nodes on patient survival in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical impact of suspicious extra-abdominal lymph nodes (EALNs) identified preoperatively on CT and/or PET/CT images in advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted with 122 patients diagnosed with stage III or IV ovarian cancer with preoperative CT and/or PET/CT images from 2006 to 2022. Imaging studies were evaluated for the presence, size and location of suspicious EALNs. Suspicious lymph node enlargement was defined by a cut-off ≥5mm short-axis dimension on CT and/or lesions with maximum standardized uptake values of ≥2.5 on PET/CT. This study only included patients who did not have their EALNs surgically removed.

RESULTS

A total 109 patients met the inclusion criteria; 36 (33%) had suspicious EALNs and were categorized as "node-positive". The median overall survival (OS) was 45.73 months for the "node-positive" and 46.50 months for the "node-negative" patients (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.68-2.00, p = 0.579). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for other variables selected by process of backward elimination using a significance level of p<0.20, suspicious EALNs still showed no clinical significance on OS (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 0.67-2.13, p = 0.537) as well as progression-free survival (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 0.85-2.41, p = 0.174). Old age (aHR 2.23, 95% CI 1.28-3.89, p = 0.005) and platinum resistance (aHR 1.92, 95% CI 1.10-3.36, p = 0.023) affects adversely on OS.

CONCLUSION

Suspicious EALNs did not worsen the prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. However, its impact on survival is not yet clarified. Further investigation is required to assess the clinical significance of suspicious EALNs on preoperative imaging studies.

Limitations and potential of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the third most common gynecological cancer and alone has an emergence rate of approximately 308,069 cases worldwide (2020) with dire survival rates. To put it into perspective, the mortality rate of OC is three times higher than that of breast cancer and it is predicted to only increase significantly by 2040. The primary reasons for such a high rate are that the physical symptoms of OC are detectable only during the advanced phase of the disease when resistance to chemotherapies is high and around 80% of the patients that do indeed respond to chemotherapy initially, show a poor prognosis subsequently. This highlights a pressing need to develop new and effective therapies to tackle advanced OC to improve prognosis and patient survival. A major advance in this direction is the emergence of combination immunotherapeutic methods to boost CD8+ T cell function to tackle OC. In this perspective, we discuss our view of the current state of some of the combination immunotherapies in the treatment of advanced OC, their limitations, and potential approaches toward a safer and more effective response.

Adverse Effect of the Duration of Antibiotic Use Prior to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on the Overall Survival of Patients with Recurrent Gynecologic Malignancies

PURPOSE

Antibiotic use preceding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has been associated with a decreased efficacy of ICI in solid tumors. In this study, we evaluated the effect of antibiotic use before ICI therapy on oncological outcomes.

METHODS

We examined patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies at two academic institutions. The clinical data, including antibiotic use within 60 days of ICI initiation, type of antibiotics, reasons for antibiotic use, body mass index, tumor site, chemotherapy-free interval, prior history of radiotherapy, disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS), were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 215 patients, 22.9% (n = 47) received antibiotics before ICI treatment. The most common cancer was ovarian (52.1%, n = 112), followed by cervical (24.7%, n = 53) and endometrial (16.7%, n = 36). When we divided the cohort based on antibiotic use before ICIs, there were no significant differences in the DCR and baseline characteristics between the two groups. On multivariate analyses, the variables associated with poor OS were previous use of antibiotics for a cumulative duration of >14 days (HR 2.286, 95% CI 1.210-4.318; p = 0.011); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2 or 3 (HR 4.677, 95% CI 2.497-8.762; p < 0.001); and chemotherapy-free interval of <6 months (HR 2.007, 95% CI 1.055-3.819; p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Prior use of antibiotics for a cumulative duration of >14 days was associated with reduced survival in recurrent gynecologic malignancies.

Strategies to synergize PD-1/PD-L1 targeted cancer immunotherapies to enhance antitumor responses in ovarian cancer

Anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies have developed rapidly but exhibited modest activity in ovarian cancer (OC), achieving a clinical response rate ranging from 5.9% to 19%. Current evidence indicate that the establishment of an integrated cancer-immunity cycle is a prerequisite for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Any impairment in this cycle, including lack of cancer antigens release, impaired antigen-presenting, decreased T cell priming and activation, less T cells that are trafficked or infiltrated in tumor microenvironment (TME), and low tumor recognition and killings, will lead to decreased infiltrated cytotoxic T cells to tumor bed and treatment failure. Therefore, combinatorial strategies aiming to modify cancer-immunity cycle and reprogram tumor immune microenvironment are of great interest. By far, various strategies have been studied to enhance responsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in OC. Platinum-based chemotherapy increases neoantigens release; poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) improve the function of antigen-presenting cells and promote the trafficking of T cells into tumors; epigenetic drugs help to complete the immune cycle by affecting multiple steps; immunotherapies like anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies reactivate T cells, and other treatment strategies like radiotherapy helps to increase the expression of tumor antigens. In this review, we will summarize the preclinical studies by analyzing their contribution in modifying the cancer immunity cycle and remodeling tumor environment, and we will also summarize recent progress in clinical trials and discuss some perspectives to improve these treatment strategies.

New insights for gynecological cancer therapies: from molecular mechanisms and clinical evidence to future directions

Advanced and recurrent gynecological cancers lack effective treatment and have poor prognosis. Besides, there is urgent need for conservative treatment for fertility protection of young patients. Therefore, continued efforts are needed to further define underlying therapeutic targets and explore novel targeted strategies. Considerable advancements have been made with new insights into molecular mechanisms on cancer progression and breakthroughs in novel treatment strategies. Herein, we review the research that holds unique novelty and potential translational power to alter the current landscape of gynecological cancers and improve effective treatments. We outline the advent of promising therapies with their targeted biomolecules, including hormone receptor-targeted agents, inhibitors targeting epigenetic regulators, antiangiogenic agents, inhibitors of abnormal signaling pathways, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, agents targeting immune-suppressive regulators, and repurposed existing drugs. We particularly highlight clinical evidence and trace the ongoing clinical trials to investigate the translational value. Taken together, we conduct a thorough review on emerging agents for gynecological cancer treatment and further discuss their potential challenges and future opportunities.

PD-L1 and MHC Class I Expression in High-grade Ovarian Cancers, Including Platinum-resistant Recurrences Treated With Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Immune-modulating therapies targeting the programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunosuppressive system have been used successfully in many solid tumor types. There is evidence that biomarkers such as PD-L1 and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I help identify candidates for anti-programmed cell death-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition, though the evidence is limited in ovarian malignancies. PD-L1 and MHC Class I immunostaining was performed on pretreatment whole tissue sections in 30 cases of high-grade ovarian carcinoma. The PD-L1 combined positive score was calculated (a score of ≥1 is considered positive). MHC class I status was categorized as an intact or subclonal loss. In patients who received immunotherapy, drug response was assessed using RECIST criteria. PD-L1 was positive in 26 of 30 cases (87%; combined positive score: 1 to 100). Seven of 30 patients showed subclonal loss of MHC class I (23%), and this occurred in both PD-L1 negative (3/4; 75%) and PD-L1 positive (4/26; 15%) cases. Only 1 of 17 patients who received immunotherapy in the setting of a platinum-resistant recurrence responded to the addition of immunotherapy, and all 17 died of disease. In the setting of recurrent disease, patients did not respond to immunotherapy regardless of PD-L1/MHC class I status, suggesting that these immunostains may not be effective predictive biomarkers in this setting. Subclonal loss of expression of MHC class I occurs in ovarian carcinoma, including in PD-L1 positive cases, suggesting that the 2 pathways of immune evasion may not be mutually exclusive and that it may be important to interrogate MHC class I status in PD-L1 positive tumors to identify additional immune evasion mechanisms in these tumors.

Advances in the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecological tumors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoints are regulatory molecules that suppress immune effector cells, and are essential for maintaining tolerance, preventing autoimmune reactions, and minimizing tissue damage by controlling the duration and intensity of the immune responses. However, immune checkpoints are frequently upregulated during cancer and dampen the anti-tumor immune responses. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been effective against multiple tumors, and have improved patients' survival outcomes. Recent clinical trials have also reported promising therapeutic effects of ICIs in some gynecological cancers.

AIM

To review the current research and future directions in the treatment of gynecological malignancies, including ovarian, cervical and endometrial cancers, using ICIs.

CONCLUSION

Currently, cervical and ovarian cancers are the only gynecological tumors that are treated by immunotherapeutic approaches. In addition, ICIs, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)- and T cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T cells targeting endometrial tumors, especially those originating in the vulva and fallopian tubes, are under development. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism underlying the effects of ICIs, especially in combination with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, anti-angiogenesis drugs and poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), needs to be elucidated. Furthermore, novel predictive biomarkers have to be identified in order to increase the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs while reducing adverse reactions.

Association between Preoperative 18-FDG PET-CT SUVmax and Next-Generation Sequencing Results in Postoperative Ovarian Malignant Tissue in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer

This study investigated the association between maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) on preoperative 18-FDG PET-CT and next-generation sequencing (NGS) results in post-surgical ovarian malignant tissue in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Twenty-five patients with stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer who underwent both preoperative 18-FDG PET-CT and postoperative NGS for ovarian malignancies were retrospectively enrolled. Two patients had no detected variants, 21 of the 23 patients with any somatic variant had at least one single nucleotide variant (SNV) or insertion/deletion (indel), 10 patients showed copy number variation (CNV), and two patients had a fusion variant. SUVmax differed according to the presence of SNVs/indels, with an SUVmax of 13.06 for patients with ≥ 1 SNV/indel and 6.28 for patients without (p = 0.003). Seventeen of 20 patients with Tier 2 variants had TP53 variants, and there was a statistically significant association between SUVmax and the presence of TP53 variants (13.21 vs. 9.35, p = 0.041). Analysis of the correlation between the sum of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 numbers and SUVmax showed a statistically significant correlation (p = 0.002; Pearson’s r = 0.588). In conclusion, patients with advanced ovarian cancer with SNVs/indels on NGS, especially those with TP53 Tier 2 variants, showed a proportional association with tumor SUVmax on preoperative PET-CT.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy or combined with other small molecule-targeted agents in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal female reproductive system tumour. Despite the great advances in surgery and systemic chemotherapy over the past two decades, almost all patients in stages III and IV relapse and develop resistance to chemotherapy after first-line treatment. Ovarian cancer has an extraordinarily complex immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment in which immune checkpoints negatively regulate T cells activation and weaken antitumour immune responses by delivering immunosuppressive signals. Therefore, inhibition of immune checkpoints can break down the state of immunosuppression. Indeed, Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised the therapeutic landscape of many solid tumours. However, ICIs have yielded modest benefits in ovarian cancer. Therefore, a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanistic basis of the immune checkpoints is needed to improve the efficacy of ICIs in ovarian cancer. In this review, we systematically introduce the mechanisms and expression of immune checkpoints in ovarian cancer. Moreover, this review summarises recent updates regarding ICI monotherapy or combined with other small-molecule-targeted agents in ovarian cancer.

CD8α+ dendritic cells potentiate antitumor and immune activities against murine ovarian cancers

Dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapies have been shown to be a potential treatment option for various cancers; however, the exact strategies in ovarian cancer remain unknown. Here, we report the effectiveness of mouse CD8α+ DCs derived from bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells (BM-HSCs), equivalent to human CD141+ DCs, which have proven to be a highly superior subset. Mono-DCs from monocytes and stem-DCs from HSCs were characterized by CD11c+ CD80+ CD86+ and CD8α+ Clec9a+ expression, respectively. Despite a lower dose compared with Mono-DCs, mice treated with pulsed Stem-DCs showed a reduced amount of ascitic fluid and lower body weights compared with those of vehicle-treated mice. These mice treated with pulsed stem-DCs appeared to have fewer tumor implants, which were usually confined in the epithelium of tumor-invaded organs. All mice treated with DCs showed longer survival than the vehicle group, especially in the medium/high dose pulsed Stem-DC treatment groups. Moreover, the stem-DC-treated group demonstrated a low proportion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells, high interleukin-12 and interferon-γ levels, and accumulation of several tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Together, these results indicate that mouse CD8α+ DCs derived from BM-HSCs decrease tumor progression and enhance antitumor immune responses against murine ovarian cancer, suggesting that better DC vaccines can be used as an effective immunotherapy in EOC treatment. Further studies are necessary to develop potent DC vaccines using human CD141+ DCs.

Anti-angiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer: Current understandings and prospects of precision medicine

Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most fatal disease of gynecologic malignant tumors. Angiogenesis refers to the development of new vessels from pre-existing ones, which is responsible for supplying nutrients and removing metabolic waste. Although not yet completely understood, tumor vascularization is orchestrated by multiple secreted factors and signaling pathways. The most central proangiogenic signal, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGFR signaling, is also the primary target of initial clinical anti-angiogenic effort. However, the efficiency of therapy has so far been modest due to the low response rate and rapidly emerging acquiring resistance. This review focused on the current understanding of the in-depth mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis, together with the newest reports of clinical trial outcomes and resistance mechanism of anti-angiogenic agents in OC. We also emphatically summarized and analyzed previously reported biomarkers and predictive models to describe the prospect of precision therapy of anti-angiogenic drugs in OC.

Phase II study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and bevacizumab for first recurrent and refractory ovarian clear cell carcinoma Kansai Clinical Oncology Group-G1601

Patients with advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) have a poor prognosis in the absence of an effective standard treatment. Combination therapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and bevacizumab (GPBev) is promising for ovarian CCC. Thus, we conducted a multi-institutional, phase II trial in Japan to examine the efficacy and safety of GPBev for CCC. This is the first study on the use of GPBev for CCC. Eighteen patients (median age, 56.5 years) with pathologically confirmed first recurrent or refractory CCC and having evaluable regions, as assessed using RECIST, were recruited between January 2017 and May 2019. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2), cisplatin (40 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 15, every 28 days, for 6-10 cycles, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs). Fifteen patients (83.3%) completed 6-10 cycles of treatment; three patients (two with AEs and one with progressive disease) did not. The ORR was 61.1% [complete response (CR) 3 and partial response (PR) 8] and DCR was 88.9% (CR 3, PR 8, and stable disease 5). Grade 3 and 4 hematological AEs were observed in 16.7 and 5.6% of the patients, respectively. Nonhematological AEs of grades 3 and 4 were observed in 27.8 and 5.6% of the patients, respectively. GPBev is a promising therapy for CCC owing to the high ORR and acceptable toxicity for the first recurrence and refractory CCC.

Chemotherapy-free treatment of recurrent advanced ovarian cancer: myth or reality?

Advanced ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy. Surgery and, in most cases, platinum-based chemotherapy with or without maintenance with bevacizumab and/or poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) represent the mainstay of treatment, but the disease typically recurs. The treatment of these patients represents a clinical challenge because sequential chemotherapy regimens are often used, with suboptimal outcomes and cumulative toxicity. Chemotherapy-free regimens, based on combinations of PARPi, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, anti-programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1, and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 antibodies, among others, represent a valid option, with manageable toxicity profile and ease of administration. This review addresses this new strategy in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer and discusses its feasibility in the treatment landscape of the disease.

The current landscape of predictive and prognostic biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade in ovarian cancer

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has evoked a prominent shift in anticancer therapy. Durable clinical antitumor activity to ICB has been observed in patients with ovarian cancer (OC). However, only a subset of patients derive clinical benefit, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by ICB therapy can lead to permanent tissue damage and even fatal consequences. It is thus urgent to develop predictive biomarkers to optimize patient outcomes and minimize toxicity risk. Herein, we review current predictive and prognostic biomarkers for checkpoint immunotherapy in OC and highlight emerging biomarkers to guide treatment with ICB. The prevalent biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression status, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, mutational burden, and immune gene signatures, are further discussed. We provide a state-of-the-art survey on prognostic and predictive biomarkers for checkpoint immunotherapy and offer valuable information for guiding precision immunotherapy

A durable response to programmed cell death 1 blockade in a multidrug-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer patient with HLA-B44 supertype: A case report

Relapsed/refractory ovarian cancer, especially platinum resistance recurrence, remains a major therapeutic challenge. Here, we present the case of a patient with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) who failed to respond to multiline chemotherapy and target therapy but achieved an immune complete response (iCR) with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor treatment. The overall survival (OS) was 59 months, and the recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 34 months after immunotherapy, which was counting. Meantime, molecular testing results revealed that traditional biomarkers for immunotherapy, including PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor mutational burden (TMB), were negative. HLA-B44 (B*18:01) supertype was confirmed by sequence-based HLA typing. This case raises the possibility that ovarian cancer patients with multidrug resistance may still benefit from PD-1 inhibitor therapy, even if PD-L1 pathology is negative.

Antiangiogenic Strategies in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Mechanism, Resistance, and Combination Therapy

Angiogenesis is one of the hallmarks of cancer and plays a crucial role in carcinogenesis and progression of epithelial ovarian cancer. Antiangiogenic agent is the first approved targeted agent in ovarian cancer. Anti-angiogenic agents mainly include agents target VEGF/VEGFR pathway, such as bevacizumab and agents target receptor tyrosine kinase, and non-VEGF/VEGFR targets of angiogenesis. Antiangiogenic agents demonstrate certain effects in ovarian cancer treatment either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. Unfortunately, antiangiogenic agents, such as bevacizumab, integrated into the ovarian cancer treatment paradigm do not increase cures. Thus, the benefits of anti-angiogenic agents must be carefully weighed against the cost and associated toxicities. Antiangiogenic agents drug resistance and short of predictive biomarkers are main obstacles in ovarian cancer treatment. A combination of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors might be great strategies to overcome resistance as well as enhance anti-tumor activity of anti-angiogenic drugs. Predictive biomarkers of antiangiogenic agents are in urgent need.

Comparative Analysis of Predictive Biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Cancers: Developments and Challenges

Simple Summary

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has greatly changed the treatment landscape of multiple malignancies. However, the wide administration of ICIs is mainly obstructed by the low response rate and several life-threatening adverse events. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify sets of biomarkers to predict which patients will respond to ICIs. In this review, we discuss the recently investigated molecular and clinical determinants of ICI response, from the aspects of tumor features, clinical features, as well as tumor microenvironment.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have dramatically changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Both remarkable and durable responses have been observed in patients with melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and other malignancies. However, the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has demonstrated meaningful clinical responses and benefits in only a subset of patients. In addition, several severe and life-threatening adverse events were observed in these patients. Therefore, the identification of predictive biomarkers is urgently needed to select patients who are more likely to benefit from ICI therapy. PD-L1 expression level is the most commonly used biomarker in clinical practice for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, negative PD-L1 expression cannot reliably exclude a response to a PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Other factors, such as tumor microenvironment and other tumor genomic signatures, appear to impact the response to ICIs. In this review, we examine emerging data for novel biomarkers that may have a predictive value for optimizing the benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

Barriers to Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: Metabolic, Genomic, and Immune Perturbations in the Tumour Microenvironment

A lack of explicit early clinical signs and effective screening measures mean that ovarian cancer (OC) often presents as advanced, incurable disease. While conventional treatment combines maximal cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy, patients frequently develop chemoresistance and disease recurrence. The clinical application of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) aims to restore anti-cancer T-cell function in the tumour microenvironment (TME). Disappointingly, even though tumour infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with superior survival in OC, ICB has offered limited therapeutic benefits. Herein, we discuss specific TME features that prevent ICB from reaching its full potential, focussing in particular on the challenges created by immune, genomic and metabolic alterations. We explore both recent and current therapeutic strategies aiming to overcome these hurdles, including the synergistic effect of combination treatments with immune-based strategies and review the status quo of current clinical trials aiming to maximise the success of immunotherapy in OC.

Comprehensive Analyses Identify APOBEC3A as a Genomic Instability-Associated Immune Prognostic Biomarker in Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most malignant tumors whose mortality rate ranks first in gynecological tumors. Although immunotherapy sheds new light on clinical treatments, the low response still restricts its clinical use because of the unique characteristics of OC such as immunosuppressive microenvironment and unstable genomes. Further exploration on determining an efficient biomarker to predict the immunotherapy response of OC patients is of vital importance. In this study, integrative analyses were performed systematically using transcriptome profiles and somatic mutation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) based on the immune microenvironment and genomic instability of OC patients. Firstly, intersection analysis was conducted to identify immune-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and genomic instability-related DEGs. Secondly, Apolipoprotein B MRNA Editing Enzyme Catalytic Subunit 3A (APOBEC3A) was recognized as a protective factor for OC, which was also verified through basic experiments such as quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), and transwell assays. Thirdly, the correlation analyses of APOBEC3A expression with tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TICs), inhibitory checkpoint molecules (ICPs), Immunophenoscores (IPS), and response to anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy were further applied along with single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA), demonstrating APOBEC3A as a promising biomarker to forecast the immunotherapy response of OC patients. Last, the relationship between APOBEC3A expression with tumor mutation burden (TMB), DNA damage response (DDR) genes, and m6A-related regulators was also analyzed along with the experimental verification of immunofluorescence (IF) and RT-qPCR, comprehensively confirming the intimate association of APOBEC3A with genomic instability in OC. In conclusion, APOBEC3A was identified as a protective signature and a promising prognostic biomarker for forecasting the survival and immunotherapy effect of OC patients, which might accelerate the clinical application and improve immunotherapy effect.

Stromal infiltrating mast cells identify immunoevasive subtype high-grade serous ovarian cancer with poor prognosis and inferior immunotherapeutic response

Tumor infiltrating mast cells (TIMs), with pro- or anti-tumorigenic role in different types of malignancies, have been implicated in resistance to anti-PD1 therapy. Here, we aimed to identify the relevance of TIMs with the prognosis, immune contexture, and immunotherapy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Tissue microarrays containing 197 HGSOC patients were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for detecting the expression of mast cell tryptase and other immune markers. Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test, and Cox regression model were applied to perform survival analysis. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis and flow cytometric analysis were selected to characterize TIMs. Furthermore, short-term HGSOC organoids were employed to validate the effect of TIMs on anti-PD1 therapy. Abundance of stromal TIMs (sTIMs) predicted dismal prognosis and linked to immunoevasive subtype of HGSOC, characterized by increased infiltration of pro-tumor cells (Treg cells, M2-polarized macrophages, and neutrophils) and impaired anti-tumor immune functions. Intensive inter-cell interactions between TIMs and other immune cells were identified, suggesting potential cross-talks to foster an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Organoids derived from sTIMs-low patients were associated with increased response to anti-PD-1 treatment other than the presence of high sTIMs infiltration. A nomogram, constructed by combining FIGO stage, sTIMs, and PD-L1, with an area under the curve (AUC) for predicting 5-year overall survival of 0.771 was better than that of FIGO staging system of 0.619. sTIMs/PD-L1-based classifier has potential clinical application in predicting prognosis of patients with HGSOC. sTIMs-high tumors correlate with immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and possess potential insensitivity to immunotherapy.

ARID1A mutation/ARID1A loss is associated with a high immunogenic profile in clear cell ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

ARID1A mutation is frequently found in clear cell ovarian cancer (CCC) and endometrioid ovarian cancer (EC). Anti-PD-1 monotherapy has been found to have limited efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer; however, anti-PD-1 therapy showed significant clinical benefit in some CCC. We sought to define the relationship of ARID1A mutation/ARID1A expression to the immunogenic profile of different histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We performed next-generation sequencing of 160 cancer-related genes. Also, we analyzed the immunohistochemical status of ARID1A, PD-L1, and CD8 with survival in different histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer in a total of 103 cases.

RESULTS

ARID1A mutation was found in 0% of the high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) (n = 36), 41.5% of the CCC (n = 41), 45.0% of the EC (n = 20), and 33.3% of the mucinous ovarian cancer (MC) (n = 6) cases. ARID1A loss was found in 19.4% of the HGSC, 75.6% of the CCC, 60.0% of the EC and 0% of the MC cases. ARID1A mutation was found to be associated with high PD-L1 (p < 0.001) or CD8 levels (p < 0.001) in CCC but not in other histologic subtypes. Meanwhile, ARID1A loss was associated with high PD-L1 or CD8 levels in CCC (p < 0.001) and HGSC (p < 0.001) but not in EC and MC. In addition, ARID1A mutation was associated with high tumor mutation burden in CCC (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

ARID1A mutation/ARID1A expression is associated with immune microenvironmental factors in CCC but not in EC. ARID1A status can be a biomarker for selecting candidates for immune checkpoint blockade in CCC.

Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

Background

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) have been progressively used in cancer treatment and produced unique toxicity profiles. This systematic review aims to comprehend the patterns and occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) based on ICI.

Methods

PICOS/PRISMA methods were used to identify published English-language on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from 2015 to 2020. Published clinical trials on ICI monotherapy, combined ICIs, and ICI plus other treatment with tabulated data on grade≥3 trAEs were included. Odds ratio (OR), χ² tests were used to analyze for effect size and associations.

Results

This review included 145 clinical trials involving 21786 patients. Grade 3-5 trAEs were more common with ICI when they were plused with other treatments compared with ICI monotherapy(54.3% versus 17.7%, 46.1%, p<0.05). Grade 3-5 trAEs were also more common with CTLA-4 mAbs compared with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 (34.2% versus 15.1%, 13.6%, p<0.05). Hyperthyroidism (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.7–8.6), nausea (OR 3.7, 95%CI 2.5–5.3), diarrhea (OR 2.7, 95%CI 2.2–3.2), colitis (OR 3.4, 95%CI 2.7–4.3), ALT increase (OR 4.9, 95%CI 3.9–6.1), AST increase (OR 3.8, 95%CI 3.0–4.9), pruritus (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.5–3.9), rash (OR 2.8, 95%CI 2.1–3.8), fatigue (OR 2.8, 95%CI 2.2–3.7), decreased appetite (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.5–3.8), and hypophysitis (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.2–3.3) were more frequent with combined ICIs. Diarrhea (OR 8.1, 95%CI 6.4–10.3), colitis (OR 12.2, 95%CI 8.7–17.1), ALT increase (OR 5.1, 95%CI 3.5–7.4), AST increase (OR 4.2, 95%CI 2.8–6.3), pruritus (OR 4.1, 95%CI 2.0–8.4), rash (OR 4.4, 95%CI 2.9–6.8), hypophysitis (OR 12.1, 95%CI 6.3–23.4) were more common with CTLA-4 mAbs; whereas pneumonitis (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.1–10.3) were more frequent with PD-1 mAbs.

Conclusions

Different immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with different treatment-related adverse events profiles. A comprehensive data in this systematic review will provide comprehensive information for clinicians.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OC) has limited treatment options and is associated with a poor prognosis. There appears to be an overlap between molecular mechanisms responsible for platinum resistance and immunogenicity in OC. Immunotherapy with single agent checkpoint inhibitors has been evaluated in a few clinical trials with disappointing results. This has prompted exploration of immunotherapy combination strategies with chemotherapy, anti-angiogenics, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and other targeted agents. The role of immunotherapy in the treatment of platinum-resistant OC remains undefined. The aim of this review is to describe the immunobiology of OC and likely benefit from immunotherapy, discuss clinical trial data and biomarkers that warrant further exploration, as well as provide an overview of future drug development strategies.

Current status of cancer immunotherapy for gynecologic malignancies

Recent cancer immunotherapy development with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown durable clinical responses in a wide variety of tumor types. These drugs targeting programmed cell death 1, its ligand programmed death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T cell lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 have revolutionized the field of cancer treatment. It is of significant interest in optimizing the immunotherapy for cancer patients beyond the conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Many clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of various combined regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported and are in progress. Among gynecologic malignancy, endometrial cancers have distinct subtypes with microsatellite instability-high status and polymerase ɛ mutation. These types have been shown to immunogenic tumors and appropriated candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Also, recurrent cervical cancer showed a promising objective response with single anti-PD1 Ab treatment. Despite their definite outcome and considerable potential of immunotherapy, not all patients received a survival benefit and further understanding of human tumor immunology is essential to improve this type of therapy. In this review, we have summarized the updated results of clinical trials of cancer immunotherapy for gynecologic malignancies and discussed the future perspectives.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab based therapies in triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review of clinical trials

Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths among women. There are a limited number of targeted therapies available for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. Among checkpoint inhibitors, atezolizumab is the only drug approved for PD-L1+ TNBC patients. We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in triple-negative breast cancer. We included 15 clinical trials in this review. Pembrolizumab was well tolerated by all patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Pembrolizumab was more effective in the treatment of early-stage TNBC patients as compared to placebo, regardless of PD-L1 status. In advanced-stage breast cancer, pembrolizumab was as effective as single-agent chemotherapy with a better safety profile. Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy showed significantly better median progression free survival as compared to chemotherapy in advanced TNBC.

Complete remission of heavily treated ovarian clear cell carcinoma with ARID1A mutations after pembrolizumab and bevacizumab combination therapy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) have a poor prognosis because they show low sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. New treatments for refractory OCCC are urgently needed.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a patient with refractory OCCC in whom conventional chemotherapy failed. Cachexia was induced by the disseminating recurrent tumors. Tumor tissue staining and genomic analysis revealed PD-L1 negativity, a low tumor burden, stable microsatellite instability, and two mutations in ARID1A. The patient was administered pembrolizumab combined with bevacizumab triweekly. Her serum CA-125 level decreased dramatically after the first cycle. A computerized tomography scan showed marked regression of the recurrent masses after 3 cycles, and the patient reached complete remission after 9 cycles. She showed good recovery from cachexia. We observed no marked side effects except for mild polyarthritis of the small joints.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic effect of checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is very promising in our patient with OCCC. Further clinical trials of tumors including ARID1A mutations are warranted.

Pembrolizumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Subgroup analysis from the KEYNOTE-100

Interim results from the two-cohort, phase 2 KEYNOTE-100 study (NCT02674061) of 376 patients with previously treated advanced recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) showed that pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with an objective response rate (ORR) of 8.0% (95% CI, 5.4-11.2). We present outcomes for the Japanese patients (n = 21) enrolled in KEYNOTE-100. Patients with epithelial ROC had received either 1-3 prior chemotherapy lines and had platinum-free interval or treatment-free interval (PFI; TFI) of 3-12 months (cohort A) or 4-6 prior chemotherapy lines and had PFI/TFI of ≥3 months (cohort B). All patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks as monotherapy for 2 years or until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Primary objectives were ORR per RECIST v1.1 for each cohort and higher programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor expression. The relationship between PD-L1 expression (measured as combined positive score [CPS]) and ORR was assessed. Twenty-one Japanese patients (cohort A, n = 19; cohort B, n = 2) were treated. The median (range) age was 57 (37-78) years; 19 (90.5%) patients had ECOG status of 0 and 16 (76.2%) patients had stage III-IV disease. ORR was 19.0% (95% CI, 5.4-41.9) and seemed to increase with increasing PD-L1 expression. A total of 13 (61.9%) patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), and 5 (23.8%) had grade 3-4 TRAE. There were no treatment-related deaths in this subpopulation. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with antitumor activity in Japanese patients with ROC, with no new safety signals identified in this subpopulation. The data suggested a trend toward higher PD-L1 expression among some patients with higher ORR.