Somatostatin and dopamine receptor expression in neuroendocrine neoplasms: correlation of immunohistochemical findings with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy visual scores

Low to intermediate grade lung neuroendocrine tumours. A single centre real world experience

INTRODUCTION

Lung neuroendocrine tumours (LNETs) are a rare heterogenous group of tumours whose incidence has been increasing. We investigated the diagnosis, treatment, and survival patterns of patients with low to intermediate grade LNETs.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with low to intermediate grade LNETs, treated at a Canadian tertiary-level cancer centre was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 59 patients. Most were G1or G2 and well or moderately differentiated. Forty-seven patients presented with local or locally advanced disease, of which 57.4 % received curative intent surgery. The rest were treated with definitive radiation, radical chemoradiation with platinum and etoposide, palliative chemotherapy with doxorubicin, or supportive care. The five-year overall survival (OS) for those treated surgically was 83 % versus 44 % in the non-surgical group. Metastatic disease was seen in 24/59 patients, with a five-year OS in patients with stage IV disease of 39 %. Of those with advanced or unresectable disease (n = 32), 21 received palliative systemic treatment with up to three lines of therapy. First-line treatment was most commonly chemotherapy with platinum/etoposide combination or somatostatin analogue therapy. Second-line treatment involved chemotherapy or targeted everolimus. PRRT was used once as a first-line and once as second-line therapy. Third-line included lanreotide or chemotherapy with capecitabine/temozolomide combination.

CONCLUSION

Overall, patients with surgically resectable disease had a good five-year OS. However, inoperable or more advanced disease was associated with a poorer OS. Despite many treatment options, the sequence of treatments is poorly established. This highlights the need for further development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines for LNET patients.

From biology to clinical practice: antiproliferative effects of somatostatin analogs in neuroendocrine neoplasms

Somatostatin analogs (SSA), specifically octreotide and lanreotide, have demonstrated antiproliferative effects in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET), a group of rare malignancies of diverse origin and presentation. A prominent feature of NET cells is the expression of G protein-coupled receptors called somatostatin receptors (SSTR). Although these SSTR are not uniformly present in NET, they can be instrumental in the diagnosis and treatment of NET. Apart from their application in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy, SSA have proven invaluable in the treatment of hormonal syndromes associated with certain NET (antisecretory effects of SSA), but it took more than two decades to convincingly demonstrate the antiproliferative effects of SSA in metastatic NET with the two pivotal studies PROMID and CLARINET. The current review summarizes three decades of SSA treatment and provides an overview of the clinical trial landscape for SSA monotherapy and combination therapy, including clinical implications and quality of life aspects, as well as ongoing fields of research.

Primary Renal Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Analyis of Six Cases from a Tertiary Care Center in North India with Review of Literature

Well-differentiated renal neuroendocrine tumors are rare tumors. As their biologic behavior is not fully known, there is a need to know more about these cases. We performed a retrospective chart review of all the cases diagnosed with renal neuroendocrine tumors from January 2016 to December 2020 (five years) in order to understand their clinical features, morphological characteristics and outcome. We included six cases with mean age of 46.2 years (4 males) in our study. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy. Histologically all showed tumor disposed in nests and trabeculae and majority of the tumors belonged to well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor Grade 1 (WHO criteria of gastoroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms). Lymph node metastasis was seen in two cases at the time of clinical presentation. All the tumors were diffusely positive for neuroendocrine tumor markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin, NSE, CD56). Follow-up data was available in all cases with an average follow-up of two years and neither has shown evidence of metastasis or relapse till last follow-up. Role of morphological patterns and immunohistochemical markers is highlighted with the importance of including Ki-67 index in grading them to better understand their outcome.

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for [68Ga]Ga-(HA-)DOTATATE to predict whole-body distribution and tumor sink effects in GEP-NET patients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about parameters that have a relevant impact on (dis)similarities in biodistribution between various ⁶⁸Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues. Additionally, the effect of tumor burden on organ uptake remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe and compare organ and tumor distribution of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and to identify factors that might cause biodistribution and tumor uptake differences between both peptides. In addition, the effect of tumor burden on peptide biodistribution in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients was assessed.

METHODS

A PBPK model was developed for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-(HA-)DOTATATE in GEP-NET patients. Three tumor compartments were added, representing primary tumor, liver metastases and other metastases. Furthermore, reactions describing receptor binding, internalization and recycling, renal clearance and intracellular degradation were added to the model. Scan data from GEP-NET patients were used for evaluation of model predictions. Simulations with increasing tumor volumes were performed to assess the tumor sink effect.

RESULTS

Data of 39 and 59 patients receiving [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE, respectively, were included. Evaluations showed that the model adequately described image-based patient data and that different receptor affinities caused organ uptake dissimilarities between both peptides. Sensitivity analysis indicated that tumor blood flow and blood volume impacted tumor distribution most. Tumor sink predictions showed a decrease in spleen uptake with increasing tumor volume, which seemed clinically relevant for patients with total tumor volumes higher than ~ 550 mL.

CONCLUSION

The developed PBPK model adequately predicted tumor and organ uptake for this GEP-NET population. Relevant organ uptake differences between [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE were caused by different affinity profiles, while tumor uptake was mainly affected by tumor blood flow and blood volume. Furthermore, tumor sink predictions showed that for the majority of patients a tumor sink effect is not expected to be clinically relevant.

Somatostatin receptor saturation after administration of high peptide amounts of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE: when enough is enough

BACKGROUND

Receptor saturation during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) could result in altered [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE uptake in tumors and organs. Therefore, receptor expression status and effects of different (unlabeled) administered peptide amounts during PRRT need to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess potential receptor saturation during PRRT by comparing organ and tumor uptake after administration of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE with low, standard and high administered peptide amounts in patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

METHODS

Data of NET patients that received 7.4 GBq 177-Lutetium labeled to a low or high amount of HA-DOTATATE were retrospectively included. From included patients other PRRT cycles, containing standard administered peptide amounts, were included for intra-patient comparison. Uptake quantification was performed for spleen, liver, kidney, bone marrow, blood pool and tumor lesions on post-treatment SPECT/CT scans. A paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to determine uptake differences between two adjacent cycles for each patient.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients received [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE with a high administered peptide amount (mean 346 µg vs 178 µg standard peptide amount). Low peptide amounts were administered to fifteen patients (mean 109 µg vs 202 µg standard peptide amount). High administered peptide amount resulted in significantly lower [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE uptake in the spleen (p = 0.00012), kidney (p = 0.013) and tumor lesions (p < 0.0001) versus standard peptide amounts. For low administered peptide amount, uptake was increased in the spleen (p = 0.015), while tumor uptake was significantly reduced (p = 0.015) compared to uptake after administration of standard peptide amounts.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirmed a peptide amount-dependent organ and tumor accumulation for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE, with receptor saturation in spleen for high and standard peptide amounts, while tumor and kidney receptor saturation occur only with high administered peptide amounts. A high peptide amount (~ 350 µg) is not recommended for standard-dose PRRT and standard amounts (~ 200 µg) seem more suitable to achieve optimal tumor accumulation with limited organ uptake.

Immunohistochemical assessment and clinical, histopathologic, and molecular correlates of membranous somatostatin type-2A receptor expression in high-risk pediatric central nervous system tumors

INTRODUCTION

177Lu-DOTATATE, a radionuclide therapy that binds somatostatin type-2A receptors (SST2A), has demonstrated efficacy in neuroendocrine tumors and evidence of central nervous system (CNS) penetration, supporting potential expansion within pediatric neuro-oncology. Understanding the prevalence of SST2A expression across pediatric CNS tumors is essential to identify patients who may benefit from somatostatin receptor-targeted therapy and to further elucidate the oncogenic role of SST2A.

METHODS

SST2A immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on tumor specimens and interpreted by an experienced pathologist (blinded), utilizing semi-quantitative scoring of membranous expression within viable tumor. Immunoreactive cell percentage was visually scored as 0 (none), 1 (<10%), 2 (10-50%), 3 (51-80%), or 4 (>80%). Staining intensity was scored as 0 (none), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), or 3 (strong). Combined scores for each specimen were calculated by multiplying percent immunoreactivity and staining intensity values (Range: 0-12).

RESULTS

A total of 120 tumor samples from 114 patients were analyzed. Significant differences in SST2A IHC scores were observed across histopathologic diagnoses, with consistently high scores in medulloblastoma (mean ± SD: 7.5 ± 3.6 [n=38]) and meningioma (5.7 ± 3.4 [n=15]), compared to minimal or absent expression in ATRT (0.3 ± 0.6 [n=3]), ETMR (1.0 ± 0 [n=3]), ependymoma (grades I-III; 0.2 ± 0.7 [n=27]), and high-grade glioma (grades III-IV; 0.4 ± 0.7 [n=23]). Pineoblastoma (3.8 ± 1.5 [n=4]) and other embryonal tumors (2.0 ± 4.0 [n=7]) exhibited intermediate, variable expression. Among medulloblastomas, SST2A IHC scores were higher in non-SHH (8.5 ± 3.1) than SHH (5.0 ± 3.3) molecular subgroups (p=0.033). In a subset of paired primary and recurrent specimens from four patients, SST2A IHC scores remained largely unchanged.

DISCUSSION

High membranous SST2A expression was demonstrated in medulloblastoma, meningioma, and some rarer embryonal tumors with potential diagnostic, biologic, and therapeutic implications. Somatostatin receptor-targeted therapy such as 177Lu-DOTATATE deserves further investigation in these highly SST2A-expressing pediatric CNS tumors.

High-risk pituitary adenomas and strategies for predicting response to treatment

High-risk pituitary adenomas are aggressive. They show clinical and imaging features similar to those of carcinomas, including infiltration of the surrounding brain structures, but lack cerebrospinal or systemic metastases. In addition, they display distinct behavior, including tendency for fast growth and frequent recurrences, which are difficult to control. The term "high-risk" adenoma was first introduced in the 4th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Endocrine Tumors in 2017. Five defined adenoma types belong to this category, including sparsely granulated somatotroph, lactotroph in men, Crooke cell, silent corticotroph, and plurihormonal PIT-1 positive adenomas. The morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of high-risk adenomas are herein described in detail. In addition, the clinical features and the treatment options are presented. This review focuses on predictive markers assessed by immunohistochemistry, which help clinicians to design the appropriate treatment strategies for high-risk adenomas. Somatostatin receptor status predicts effectiveness of postsurgical treatment with somatostatin analogs, and MGMT expression predicts response to treatment with temozolomide. This comprehensive review presents the clinical and pathological features of high-risk pituitary adenomas, underlines the contribution of immunohistochemistry, and emphasizes the leading role of pathology in the design of optimal clinical management.

Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies

Simple Summary

Tumor resistance, both primary and acquired, is leading to increased complexity in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs, which would be greatly helped by reliable prognostic/predictive factors. The importance in identifying resistance is being contributed to by the increased array of possible treatments available for treating resistant advanced disease; the variable clinical course as well as response to any given treatment approach of patients within one staging or grading system, the advances in imaging which are providing increasing promising results/parameters that correlate with grading/outcome/resistance, the increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis providing promising prognostic markers, all of which can contribute to selecting the best treatment to overcome resistance disease. Several factors have been identified that have prognostic/predictive value for identifying development resistant disease and affecting overall survival (OS)/PFS with various nonsurgical treatments of patients with advanced panNENs. Prognostic factors identified for patients with advanced panNENs for both OS/PFSs include various clinically-related factors (clinical, laboratory/biological markers, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors. Particularly important prognostic factors for the different treatment modalities studies are the recent grading systems. Most prognostic factors for each treatment modality for OS/PFS are not specific for a given treatment option. These advances have generated several controversies and new unanswered questions, particularly those related to their possible role in predicting the possible sequence of different anti-tumor treatments in patients with different presentations. Each of these areas is reviewed in this paper.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.

Role of Somatostatin Signalling in Neuroendocrine Tumours

Somatostatin (SST) is a small peptide that exerts inhibitory effects on a wide range of neuroendocrine cells. Due to the fact that somatostatin regulates cell growth and hormone secretion, somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) have become valuable targets for the treatment of different types of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). NETs are a heterogeneous group of tumours that can develop in various parts of the body, including the digestive system, lungs, and pituitary. NETs are usually slow growing, but they are often diagnosed in advanced stages and can display aggressive behaviour. The mortality rate of NETs is not outstandingly increased compared to other malignant tumours, even in the metastatic setting. One of the intrinsic properties of NETs is the expression of SSTRs that serve as drug targets for SST analogues (SSAs), which can delay tumour progression and downregulate hormone overproduction. Additionally, in many NETs, it has been demonstrated that the SSTR expression level provides a prognostic value in predicting a therapeutic response. Furthermore, higher a SSTR expression correlates with a better survival rate in NET patients. In recent studies, other epigenetic regulators affecting SST signalling or SSA–mTOR inhibitor combination therapy in NETs have been considered as novel strategies for tumour control. In conclusion, SST signalling is a relevant regulator of NET functionality. Alongside classical SSA treatment regimens, future advanced therapies and treatment modalities are expected to improve the disease outcomes and overall health of NET patients.

Correlation and Comparison of Somatostatin Receptor Type 2 Immunohistochemical Scoring Systems with 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

The overexpression of somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) is a unique characteristic of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs), which establishes the basis for both diagnosis and therapy. The SSTR status can be evaluated by immunohistochemical staining (IHC) and 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging. This study attempted to determine the relationship between IHC and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging and to explore the optimal cutoff value for SSTR IHC reading.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 100 GEP-NENs with SSTR PET/CT and pathological data were retrospectively analyzed, which consisted of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1 (n = 9), NET G2 (n = 64), NET G3 (n = 13), neuroendocrine carcinoma ( n = 10), and mixed neuroendocrine-non-NENs ( n = 4). SSTR2-IHC results were interpreted by 4 well-established semiquantitative scoring systems, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) score, Volante score, H score, and immunoreactive score.

RESULTS

In the homogeneous SSTR2 expression group (accounting for 57% of all cases), the 4 scoring systems were highly concordant with each other (Kendall's Tau-b coefficient range: 0.80-0.96, p < 0.001) and also highly correlated with the 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging results (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients: 0.71, 0.86, 0.80, and 0.71, p < 0.001). In the heterogeneous group (43%), the 4 scoring systems revealed a lower level of concordance (the Kendall Tau-b coefficient range: 0.40-0.75, p < 0.01), and the correlation with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging was also lower, albeit statistically significant (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients: 0.53, 0.38, 0.36, and 0.33, p < 0.05). Heterogeneous SSTR2 expression was mainly observed in the HER2 2+ cases, for which the combination with H score could help identify positive cases with increased sensitivity and specificity. The highest sensitivity and specificity of H scores in predicting the imaging results were achieved at 86.10 and 89.30% when defining the cutoff value as 160, indicating that 80% of the tumor cells were moderately positive or 55% were strongly positive.

CONCLUSIONS

SSTR2 IHC was found to predict 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging accurately, especially in the homogeneous expression group. According to the positive 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT outcomes, 80% of the tumor cells moderately positive or 55% strongly positive was the cutoff values for SSTR2-IHC reading.

Quantitative digital image analysis of somatostatin receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Immunohistochemical analysis of somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) provides important information regarding the potential therapeutic efficacy of somatostatin analogues (SSAs) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. HER2 scoring has been proposed to interpret SSTR2 immunoreactivity but their reproducibility was relatively low because of its intrinsic subjective nature. Digital image analysis (DIA) has recently been proposed as an objective and more precise method of evaluating immunoreactivity. Therefore, in this study, we used DIA for analyzing SSTR2 immunoreactivity in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) to obtain its H score and "(%) strong positive cells" and compared the results with those of manually obtained HER2 scores. Membranous SSTR2 immunoreactivity evaluated by DIA was calculated by two scales as: "Membrane Optical Density" and "Minimum Membrane Completeness". PanNETs with HER2 score of > 2 demonstrated the highest concordance with results of "(%) strong positive cells" obtained by DIA when "Minimum Membrane Completeness" was tentatively set at 80%. The SSTR2 immunoreactivity, evaluated based on all scoring systems, was different between grades G1 and G2 in insulinoma but not in non-functional PanNETs. DIA provided reproducible results of SSTR2 immunoreactivity in PanNETs and yielded important information as to the potential application of SSAs.

SSTR2 Expression in Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Clinical and Therapeutic Implications

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) expression has previously been documented in olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB). Here, we fully characterize SSTR2 expression in ONB and correlate staining results with clinicopathologic parameters including Hyams grade. We also assess SSTR2 immunohistochemistry expression in various histologic mimics of ONB to assess its diagnostic functionality. 78 ONBs (51 primary biopsies/excisions and 27 recurrences/metastases) from 58 patients were stained for SSTR2. H-scores based on intensity (0-3 +) and percentage of tumor cells staining were assigned to all cases. 51 histologic mimics were stained and scored in an identical fashion. 77/78 (99%) ONB cases demonstrated SSTR2 staining (mean H-score: 189, range: 0-290). There were no significant differences in staining between primary tumors and recurrences/metastases (mean H-score: 185 vs 198). Primary low-grade ONB had somewhat stronger staining than high-grade tumors (mean H-score: 200 vs 174). SSTR2 expression had no prognostic value when considering disease-free or disease-specific survival. SSTR2 staining is significantly higher in ONB than its histologic mimics (mean H-score: 189 vs 12.9, p < 0.001) suggesting a potential use of the marker in diagnosis of ONB. In conclusion, SSTR2 is consistently expressed in ONB suggesting a role for somatostatin-analog based imaging and therapy in this disease. More generally, SSTR2 may be another marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in ONB.

Indications of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Gastroenteropancreatic and Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Updated Review

Radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumors is a form of systemic radiotherapy that allows the administration of targeted radionuclides into tumor cells that express a large quantity of somatostatin receptors. The two most commonly used radio-peptides for radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors are ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. Radio-peptides have been used for several years in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Recently, the randomized Phase III study NETTER-1 compared¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose (double-dose) octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors, and demonstrated its efficacy in this setting. Strong signals in favor of efficiency seem to exist for other tumors, in particular for pancreatic and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. This focus on radionuclide therapy in gastroenteropancreatic and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors addresses the treatment modalities, the validated and potential indications, and the safety of the therapy.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This article is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The guidelines panel consisted of medical oncologists, pathologists, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The panel reviewed a series of questions regarding the medical management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as questions regarding surveillance after resection. The available literature was reviewed for each of the question and panel members voted on controversial topics, and the recommendations were included in a document circulated to all panel members for a final approval.

Immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: what can brown do for you?

This review is based on a presentation given at the Hans Popper Hepatopathology Society companion meeting at the 2019 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Annual Meeting. It presents updates on the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with an emphasis on the role of immunohistochemistry. Neuroendocrine neoplasms often present in liver biopsies as metastases of occult origin. Specific topics covered include 1. general features of neuroendocrine neoplasms, 2. general neuroendocrine marker immunohistochemistry, with discussion of the emerging marker INSM1, 3. non-small cell carcinoma with (occult) neuroendocrine differentiation, 4. the WHO Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with discussion of the 2019 classification of gastroenteropancreatic neoplasms, 5. use of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, 6. immunohistochemistry to assign site of origin in neuroendocrine metastasis of occult origin, 7. immunohistochemistry to distinguish well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, 8. lesions frequently misdiagnosed as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, and 9. required and recommended data elements for biopsies and resections with associated immunohistochemical stains. Next-generation immunohistochemistry, including lineage-restricted transcription factors (e.g., CDX2, islet 1, OTP, SATB2) and protein correlates of molecular genetic events (e.g., p53, Rb), is indispensable for the accurate diagnosis and classification of these neoplasms.

Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel phenothiazine derivatives as inhibitors of breast cancer stem cells

A novel series of phenothiazine derivatives containing diethanolamine, methoxyethylamine, flavonoids, and a nitric oxide (NO) donor was designed and synthesized for the treatment of breast cancer. Phenothiazine derivatives (l) did not noticeably inhibit the growth of SUM159, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and SKBR-3 cells, whereas phenothiazine derivatives (ll) containing the NO donor were more potent or had comparable inhibitory activity to trifluoperazine (TFP) and thioridazine against SUM159, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and SKBR-3 cells. Compounds 20a-c and 21a-c showed the strongest activity in SUM159, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and SKBR-3 cells, and more potent inhibitory activity than TFP against KG1a cells (IC₅₀ = 1.63, 2.93, 1.14, 1.78, 2.20, and 1.20 vs. 4.58 μM). Compounds 20a and 21a had lower toxicity than compounds 20b-c and 21b-c, and inhibited colony formation in MCF-7 cells, decreased the formation of mammospheres in SUM159 cells, and inhibited the migration of MDA-MB-231 cells. Compounds 20a and 21a could inhibited pNF-κB-p65 as shown by dual-luciferase reporter assays and western blotting in MDA-MB-231 cells.

Immunohistochemical Expression of Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes in a Panel of Neuroendocrine Neoplasias

Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs) are known to express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) 1-5, which are G-protein-coupled cell membrane receptors. Somatostatin receptor imaging and therapy utilizes the SSTR expression. Synthetic somatostatin analogs with radioligands are used to detect primary tumors, metastases, and recurrent disease. Receptor analogs are also used for treating NENs. Furthermore, commercially available SSTR antibodies can be used for the immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of SSTRs. We investigated different SSTR antibody clones applying diverse IHC protocol settings to identify reliable clones and feasible protocols for NENs. A tissue microarray including NENs from 12 different primary sites were stained. Only UMB clones were able to localize SSTR on the cell membranes of NENs. SSTR2 (UMB1) emerged as the most common subtype followed by SSTR5 (UMB4) and SSTR1 (UMB7). SSTR3 (UMB5) expression was mainly cytoplasmic. Yet, SSTR4 expression was weak and located primarily in the cytoplasm. Thus, appropriate IHC protocols, including proper positive and negative controls, represent requirements for high-quality NEN diagnostics and for planning personalized therapy.

Metastatic Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma Responding to Octreotide: A Case Report

Advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis, and the current therapeutic options, such as mitotane or platinum-based chemotherapy regimens, often offer limited efficacy. Here, we present the first report, to the author's knowledge, of metastatic ACC with positive octreoscan scintigraphy that was successfully treated with octreotide long-acting release (LAR). A patient with metastatic ACC who showed poor tolerance to mitotane received octreotide LAR because of positive octreoscan scintigraphy. She obtained major partial response to the somatostatin analog. Interestingly, the expression of somatostatin receptor 2 from the previous local recurrence lesion was negative. The next-generation sequencing-based circulating tumor DNA analysis in the patient was performed and failed to identify any alterations. These findings suggest that octreotide LAR may be a good option for the treatment of metastatic ACC in selected patients.

Different somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptor expression in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms depending on their origin

Somatostatin receptors (SST), especially SST2A, are known for their overexpression in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN). The chemokine receptor CXCR4, in contrast, is considered to be present mainly in highly proliferative and advanced tumors. However, comprehensive data are still lacking on potential differences in SST or CXCR4 expression pattern in GEP-NEN in dependence on the place of origin. Overall, 412 samples from 165 GEP-NEN patients, comprising both primary tumors (PT) and metastases (MTS), originating from different parts of the gastrointestinal tract or the pancreas were evaluated for SST and CXCR4 expression by means of immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies. SST2A was present in 85% of PT with a high intensity of expression, followed by SST5 (23%), CXCR4 (21%), SST3 (10%), SST1 (9%), and SST4 (4%). PT displayed higher SST2A and chromogranin A (CgA) expression levels than MTS. In both PT and MTS lower SST2A and CgA expression levels were found in tumors originating from the appendix or colon, compared to tumors from other origins. Tumors derived from appendix or colon were associated with significantly worse patient outcomes. Positive correlations were noted between SST2A and CgA as well as between CXCR4 and Ki-67 expression levels. SST2A and CgA negativity of the tumors was significantly associated with poor patient outcomes. All in all, SST2A was the most prominent receptor expressed in the GEP-NEN samples investigated. However, expression levels varied considerably depending on the location of the primary tumor.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST₂ and SST₅ receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST₂ is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.

Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies

INTRODUCTION

Recently, there have been a number of advances in imaging pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), as well as other neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which have had a profound effect on the management and treatment of these patients, but in some cases are also associated with controversies. Areas covered: These advances are the result of numerous studies attempting to better define the roles of both cross-sectional imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, with or without fine-needle aspiration, and molecular imaging in both sporadic and inherited panNET syndromes; the increased attempt to develop imaging parameters that correlate with tumor classification or have prognostic value; the rapidly increasing use of molecular imaging in these tumors and the attempt to develop imaging parameters that correlate with treatment/outcome results. Each of these areas and the associated controversies are reviewed. Expert commentary: There have been numerous advances in all aspects of the imaging of panNETs, as well as other NETs, in the last few years. The advances are leading to expanded roles of imaging in the management of these patients and the results being seen in panNETs/GI-NETs with these newer techniques are already being used in more common tumors.

Treatment options for PNET liver metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare pancreatic neoplasms. About 40-80% of patients with PNET are metastatic at presentation, usually involving the liver (40-93%). Liver metastasis represents the most significant prognostic factor. The aim of this study is to present an up-to-date review of treatment options for patients with liver metastases from PNETs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify all pertinent studies published up to May 2018.

RESULTS

The literature search evaluated all the therapeutic options for patients with liver metastases of PNETs, including surgical treatment, loco-regional therapies, and pharmacological treatment. All the different treatment options showed particular indications in different presentations of liver metastases of PNET. Surgery remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option in patients with PNETs and resectable liver metastases, even if relapse rates are high. Efficacy of medical treatment has increased with advances in targeted therapies, such as everolimus and sunitinib, and the introduction of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Several techniques for loco-regional control of metastases are available, including chemo- or radioembolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with PNET metastases should be multidisciplinary and must be personalized according to the features of individual patients and tumors.

Histopathological, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular markers of neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arise from cells of the neuroendocrine system located in many sites amongst which most common are the gastrointestinal (GI) system and the lung. The efforts to assess the specific site of origin or predict the biological behavior of NENs is based upon a detailed study of neoplasm's architectural pattern, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular profile. Immunohistochemistry is used to characterize the aggressivity of NENs, by assessing the proliferation index Ki-67, as well as the neuroendocrine differentiation by assessing chromogranin A (CgA) and CD56. Basal panels of immunohistochemical markers such as CDX-2, Isl-1, TTF-1, PAX6/8 are currently being used to allocate the neoplasms, while in dubious cases new markers are investigating. Unraveling the genetic and molecular mechanisms of NENs pathogenesis along with shedding light on the molecular heterogeneity of neoplasms and the individual patterns of molecular lesions, underlining these neoplasms may provide new tools in terms of diagnostics and therapeutics. Molecular targeted therapies (MTTs) such as everolimus and sunitinib have been the first example of druggable molecular targets implicated in NENs that have been approved for NEN treatment. New investigational drugs are developing along with genetic tests that may allow the identification of the specific subset of patients that will respond to each individual MTT. Multiparametrical molecular and genetic analysis such as the NETest and the MASTER are already in trials shedding light in a step-by-step management of NENs that allow not only the selection of an appropriate therapeutic option but also the identification of response to treatment or early relapse allowing an early amendment of the strategy. Summarizing the combination of histopathological, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular profile of a NEN opens new horizons in the efficient management of NENs.

Frequent expression of somatostatin receptor 2a in olfactory neuroblastomas: a new and distinctive feature

Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a malignant neuroendocrine neoplasm with a usually slow course, but with considerable recurrence rate. Many neuroendocrine tumors have shown good response to the treatment with somatostatin analogs and somatostatin radioreceptor therapy. In ONBs, there are scarce data on somatostatin-based treatment and the cellular expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR), the prerequisite for binding and effect of somatostatin on normal and tumor cells. The aim of our study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of SSTR2A and SSTR5 in a cohort of 40 ONBs. In addition, tissue microarrays containing 40 high-grade sinonasal carcinomas as well as 6 sinonasal lymphomas, 3 rhabdomyosarcomas, and 3 Ewing sarcomas were evaluated. Volante system was applied for staining evaluation. Thirty cases (75%) were immunopositive for SSTR2A and 3 (7.5%) for SSTR5. Among the 30 SSTR2A-positive ONBs, 19 tumors (63.3%) scored 2+ and 11 (36.7%) scored 3+. All SSTR5-positive ONBs scored 2+. Neither sinonasal carcinomas nor sinonasal small round blue cell neoplasms expressed SSTR2A or SSTR5. The frequent expression of SSTR2A provides a rationale for radioreceptor diagnosis and therapy with SST analogs in ONBs. SSTR2A expression in ONBs is a helpful adjunct in the differential diagnosis of ONBs.

Clinical Usefulness of Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy in Japanese Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) scintigraphy (SRS) is the standard imaging modality for evaluation of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) in Western countries. However, this modality was not approved in Japan until recently. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of SRS for detecting GEP-NET in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Japanese patients with advanced GEP-NET were enrolled and evaluated by the SRS and CT. We also compared SRS and immunohistochemical expression of SSTR type 2a (SSTR2a).

RESULTS

We enrolled 16 patients and the primary sites were the pancreas in 9, the stomach in 1, the small intestine in 2, the colon in 3, and unknown in 1. SRS showed positive findings in 3 (100%) of grade 1 (G1) and in 12 (92.3%) of grade 2 (G2) lesions. In the liver, SRS and CT detected lesions in 13 and 14 cases, respectively. The concordance rate of SSTR2a expression with SRS findings was 93.8% in the whole body and 92.9% in the liver.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS could detect almost all of G1 and G2. SRS could be useful to detect lesions, with a high concordance rate with CT and pathological findings. We confirmed that SRS is a useful and reliable modality for Japanese patients.

Antipsychotic dopamine receptor antagonists, cancer, and cancer stem cells

Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases in the world. Despite extensive studies, treating metastatic cancers remains challenging. Years of research have linked a rare set of cells known as cancer stem cells (CSCs) to drug resistance, leading to the suggestion that eradication of CSCs might be an effective therapeutic strategy. However, few drug candidates are active against CSCs. New drug discovery is often a lengthy process. Drug screening has been advantageous in identifying drug candidates. Current understanding of cancer biology has revealed various clues to target cancer from different points of view. Many studies have found dopamine receptors (DRs) in various cancers. Therefore, DR antagonists have attracted a lot of attention in cancer research. Recently, a group of antipsychotic DR antagonists has been demonstrated to possess remarkable abilities to restrain and sensitize CSCs to existing chemotherapeutics by a process called differentiation approach. In this review, we will describe current aspects of CSC-targeting therapeutics, antipsychotic DR antagonists, and their extraordinary abilities to fight cancer.

Radionuclide Therapy for Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a form of systemic radiotherapy that allows targeted delivery of radionuclides to tumor cells expressing high levels of somatostatin receptors. The two radiopeptides most commonly used for PRRT, ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, have been successfully employed for more than a decade for the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recently, the phase III, randomized NETTER-1 trial has compared ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose octreotide LAR in patients with progressive, metastatic midgut NETs, demonstrating exceptional tolerability and efficacy. This review summarizes recent developments in the field of radionuclide therapy for gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs and considers possible strategies to further enhance its clinical efficacy.

Effects of the single and combined treatment with dopamine agonist, somatostatin analog and mTOR inhibitors in a human lung carcinoid cell line: an in vitro study

Somatostatin analogues and mTOR inhibitors have been used as medical therapy in lung carcinoids with variable results. No data are available on dopamine agonists as treatment for lung carcinoids. The main aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of the combined treatment of somatostatin analogue octreotide and the dopamine agonist cabergoline with mTOR inhibitors in an in vitro model of typical lung carcinoids: the NCI-H727 cell line. In NCI-H727 cell line, reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence were assessed to characterize the expression of the somatostatin receptor 2 and 5, dopamine receptor 2 and mTOR pathway components. Fifteen typical lung carcinoids tissue samples have been used for somatostatin receptor 2, dopamine receptor 2, and the main mTOR pathway component p70S6K expression and localization by immunohistochemistry. Cell viability, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and western blot have been assessed to test the pharmacological effects of octreotide, cabergoline and mTOR inhibitors, and to evaluate the activation of specific cell signaling pathways in NCI-H727 cell line. NCI-H727 cell line expressed somatostatin receptor 2, somatostatin receptor 5 and dopamine receptor 2 and all mTOR pathway components at messenger and protein levels. Somatostatin receptor 2, dopamine receptor 2, and p70S6K (non phosphorylated and phosphorylated) proteins were expressed in most typical lung carcinoids tissue samples. Octreotide and cabergoline did not reduce cell viability as single agents but, when combined with mTOR inhibitors, they potentiate mTOR inhibitors effect after long-term exposure, reducing Akt and ERK phosphorylation, mTOR escape mechanisms, and increasing the expression DNA-damage-inducible transcript 4, an mTOR suppressor. In conclusion, the single use of octreotide and cabergoline is not sufficient to block cell viability but the combined approach of these agents with mTOR inhibitors might reduce the mTOR inhibitors-induced escape mechanisms and/or activate the endogenous mTOR suppressor, potentiating the effect of the mTOR inhibitors in an in vitro model of typical lung carcinoids.

Association Between Somatostatin Receptor Expression and Clinical Outcomes in Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVE

Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), products of gene superfamily SSTR1-5, are commonly expressed in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) bind to SSTRs and are used as therapeutic agents in patients with advanced NETs. We hypothesized that tumor SSTR expression status would be associated with clinical outcomes in NET.

METHODS

Expression of the 5 SSTRs was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, using tissue microarrays comprising 173 primary NETs, 24 matched metastases, and 22 metastatic NETs from 195 patients. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the association of SSTR expression status (high vs low) with clinical outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

High expression of SSTR2 was associated with longer overall survival (OS) in the cohort overall (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.84; P = 0.013). In a subgroup of patients with metastatic small intestine NET treated with SSAs and evaluable for progression, SSTR2 expression was associated with both longer progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. No associations with PFS or OS were observed with expression of other SSTRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that expression of SSTR2, but not other SSTRs, is associated with longer OS. In patients treated with SSAs, expression of SSTR2 is associated with longer PFS survival.

[Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors in the new WHO 2015 classification: Start of breaking new grounds?]

CLASSIFICATION

In the recently published 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the lungs, pleura, thymus and heart, all neuroendocrine tumors of the lungs (pNET) are presented for the first time in one single chapter following adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and before large cell carcinoma. In this classification, high grade small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) are differentiated from intermediate grade atypical carcinoids (AC) and low grade typical carcinoids as well as from preinvasive lesions (DIPNECH). In the 3rd WHO classification from 2004, which dealt with resection specimens, SCLC and carcinoids each had a separate chapter and LCNEC was previously listed in the chapter on large cell carcinoma of the lungs. The new WHO classification is for the first time also applicable to lung biopsies.

DIAGNOSTICS

Normally, common features of all pNET are a neuroendocrine morphology (as far as detectable in small biopsies) and expression of the neuroendocrine (NE) markers (chromogranin A, synaptophysin and CD56/NCAM). An immunohistochemical positive staining of at least one NE marker was already recommended in the 3rd edition of the WHO classification (2004) only for LCNEC. Differentiating features are a small or large cell cytomorphology/histomorphology, nuclear criteria and the mitotic rate (for SCLC >10 with a median of 80, for LCNEC >10 median 70, for AC 2 - 10, for TC < 2 each per 2 mm(2)). Tumor cell necrosis usually occurs in SCLC and LCNEC, partially in AC and not in TC. The guideline Ki67 proliferation rates are given for the first time in the new WHO classification for SCLC as 50-100 %, for LCNEC 40-80 %, for AC up to 20 % and for TC up to 5 %.

MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY

Molecular alterations occur in SCLC and LCNEC in large numbers and are very variable in quality. In AC and TC they occur much less frequently and are relatively similar.

CONCLUSION

The direct comparison of all pNET in one chapter facilitates the differential diagnostics of these tumors, provides a better transparency especially of LCNEC and allows a further comprehensive development of the clinical practical and scientific evaluation of pNET. Although a separate terminology of pNET is maintained for the lungs, a careful approach towards the gastroentero-pancreatic NET (gepNET) can be observed.

Is There an Additional Value of Using Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2a Immunohistochemistry Compared to Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy Uptake in Predicting Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Response?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It is unknown whether tumoral somatostatin receptor subtype 2a (sst2a) immunohistochemistry (IHC) has additional value compared to somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) uptake using OctreoScan® in predicting response to peptide receptor radiotherapy using 177Lu-octreotate (PRRT) in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). The aims of this study were: (1) to establish the percentage of sst2a immunopositivity in GEP-NET samples of PRRT-treated patients, (2) to determine the relationship between best GEP-NET response using RECIST 1.0 criteria 1 year after PRRT and tumoral sst2a IHC, and (3) to compare characteristics of patients with sst2a IHC-negative and -positive tumors.

METHODS

All 73 consecutive patients were selected for PRRT based on a positive SRS. Radiological response was scored according to RECIST 1.0 criteria. sst2a status was detected on tumor samples by IHC.

RESULTS

In total, 93% of GEP-NET samples showed sst2a IHC positivity. No statistically significant relationship was observed between in vitro sst2a expression and in vivo best GEP-NET response 1 year after PRRT (p = 0.47). Sex, primary tumor site, disease stage, ENETS TNM classification, Ki-67 index, highest serum chromogranin-A level, and highest neuron-specific enolase level were not significantly different between patients with negative and positive sst2a tumoral IHC with the exception of age at diagnosis (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

sst2a IHC of tumor samples has no additional value compared to SRS uptake using OctreoScan® in predicting tumor response after PRRT.

Current strategies for the treatment of severe Cushing's syndrome

Severe Cushing's syndrome may present an acute emergency in patients diagnosed with Cushing's syndrome with recent onset of at least one of the following: sepsis, opportunistic infection; intractable hypokalaemia, uncontrolled hypertension; heart failure; gastrointestinal hemorrhage; acute psychosis; progressive debilitating myopathy; thromboembolism; uncontrolled hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis. The biochemical definition includes serum cortisol ≥41μg/dl (1100 nmol/l) and/or severe hypokalemia (<3.0 mmol/l) or urine free cortisol fivefold the upper limit of normal. Treatment focuses on the management of severe metabolic disturbances followed by rapid resolution of the hypercortisolemia and subsequent confirmation of the cause. We emphasize the control of the hypokalemia, hypertension, diabetes and any psychotic state, anti-coagulation, monitoring and vigorous therapy of opportunistic infections. The ideal first-line therapies include metyrapone and ketoconazole, followed by parenteral etomidate; if all else fails life-saving bilateral adrenalectomy should be considered.