Somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, in children with GH deficiency: A randomized dose-escalation trial

Efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of norditropin and sogroya in patients with growth hormone deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Growth hormone deficiency occurs when the pituitary gland does not produce enough growth hormone. Norditropin®, a recombinant human growth hormone, and Sogroya®, an albumin-binding growth hormone derivative, are prescribed for patients with growth hormone deficiency. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with Norditropin and Sogroya.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify eligible comparative studies. All studies published until June 2023 were included in our analysis. Our outcomes for children included height velocity and height velocity standard deviation score. In contrast, adult outcomes included adverse events, insulin-like growth factor 1-standard deviation score (IGF-1 SDS), and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9). Results are reported as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1058 participants (665 children and 393 adults) were included in the meta-analysis. In children, Norditropin at doses of 0.034 and 0.067 mg/kg/day was compared to Sogroya at doses of 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, and 0.24 mg/kg/week. The results showed that 0.034 mg/kg/day Norditropin had a favorable impact on height velocity (MD -2.01, 95% CI -3.7 to -2.12, p < 0.00001) and height velocity standard deviation score (Mean Difference -3.61, 95% CI -5.06 to -2.16, p < 0.00001) when compared to Sogroya 0.04 mg/kg/day. Other doses showed comparable results. In adults, the only significant side effect noted was rash, which favored Sogroya (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.04-0.27, p < 0.00001). Additionally, IGF-1 SDS was significantly higher in the Sogroya group than in the Norditropin group (MD 0.25, 95% CI 0.02-0.48, p = 0.03). Furthermore, the overall score of the TSQM-9 questionnaire, which includes three domains: convenience, effectiveness, and satisfaction, was significantly higher in the Sogroya group compared to the Norditropin group (OR 6.36, 95% CI 3.92-8.8, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Norditropin and Sogroya showed comparable efficacy and safety profiles, except for the prevalence of rash in the Norditropin group, and Sogroya has higher satisfaction among adults. More high-quality studies with more patients are required to confirm these results.

Investigating the Bioavailability and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Release of Two Different Strengths of Somapacitan: A Randomised, Double-Blind Crossover Trial

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE

Randomised, double-blind, crossover trial to confirm bioequivalence of somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone (GH), in 5 mg/1.5 mL and 10 mg/1.5 mL strengths in equimolar doses.

METHODS

Healthy participants were randomised (1:1:1) to subcutaneous somapacitan treatment in one dosing period with 5 mg/1.5 mL and two periods with 10 mg/1.5 mL. Eligibility criteria included age 18-45 years and body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m2. Exclusion criteria included history of GH deficiency, previous GH treatment, weight > 100.0 kg and participation in any clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product within 45 days or five times the half-life of the previous investigational product before screening. Area under the curve from time 0 until last quantifiable observation (AUC0-t), maximum serum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax and terminal half-life of somapacitan and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 33 participants were randomised. For AUC0-t, estimated treatment ratio (ETR) (5 mg/1.5 mL versus 10 mg/1.5 mL) was 0.95 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.01). Point estimate and 90% CIs were within the acceptance range (0.80-1.25). For Cmax, ETR was 0.77 (90% CI 0.68-0.89). Point estimate and 90% CIs were outside the acceptance range (0.80-1.25). Mean insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-I standard deviation score concentration-time curves for each strength were almost identical. No new safety issues were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioequivalence criterion for somapacitan 5 mg/1.5 mL and 10 mg/1.5 mL was met for AUC0-t but not for Cmax. The two strengths had equivalent IGF-I responses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03905850 (3 April 2019).

Once-Weekly Somapacitan as an Alternative Management of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Prepubertal Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial

Growth hormone treatment has effectively restored normal growth in children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD); however, it poses challenges in compliance with a daily growth hormone injection regimen, leading to low adherence and persistence rates. Once-weekly Somapacitan is a potential alternative for treating children with GHD. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and adherence of once-weekly subcutaneous Somapacitan compared to daily growth hormone injection in prepubertal children with GHD. A search for the published records was carried out on 17 October 2023 utilizing the searching feature available on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Primary study outcomes included (1) efficacy, measured by height velocity (HV), standard deviation score (SDs), height SDs, insulin-like growth factor-SDs (IGF-I SDs), and bone age vs. chronological age ratio (BA vs. CA); (2) safety, assessed through adverse events and injection site reactions; and (3) adherence, determined by the percentage of the sample completing treatments. Secondary outcomes evaluated disease burden scores, divided into three subgroup domains: emotional well-being, physical functional, and social well-being scores. We retrieved 6 studies that were eligible for the systematic review (417 versus 186 for intervention and control, respectively). Only 2 of the total included studies were eligible for pooled analysis (175 versus 82 for intervention and control, respectively). The efficacy profile of Somapacitan was similar to daily growth hormones, indicated by HV (mean difference (MD = 0.04; p = 0.96), HV SDs (MD = -0.71; p = 0.09), height SDs (MD = 0.11; p = 0.69), IGF-I SDs (MD = 0.06; p = 0.70), and CA vs. BA (MD = 0.67; p = 0.70)), demonstrated similar and non-inferior outcomes. Treatment adherence is 3 times higher in the Somapacitan group as compared to control (OR = 3.02; p = 0.03) with adherence rates reaching 95% and 88% for Somapacitan and Norditropin®, respectively. The disease burden measurement is similar in Somapacitan and daily growth hormones (MD = -0.62; p = 0.83), as indicated by the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure. In almost all outcomes, the level of confidence is strong. The confidence level in the data is generally strong, but for CA vs. BA and the subgroup of severe adverse events with heterogeneity >50%, the confidence level is moderate. Although the efficacy and safety profiles of Somapacitan were found to be similar to those of daily growth hormones, a reduced frequency of once-weekly Somapacitan injections led to increased adherence. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023473209.

Developments in the Management of Growth Hormone Deficiency: Clinical Utility of Somapacitan

Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy for growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children and adults has for over 25 years, until recently, been administered as daily injections. This daily treatment regimen often incurs a burden to patients and caregivers, leading to high rates of non-adherence and, consequently, decreased treatment efficacy outcomes. To address this shortcoming, long-acting growth hormones (LAGHs) have been developed with the aim of reducing the burden of daily injections, thereby potentially improving treatment adherence and outcomes. Somapacitan (Sogroya®) (Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark) is a LAGH currently approved for the treatment of adult and childhood GHD (AGHD and CGHD, respectively) in several countries. Other LAGHs, such as somatrogon (Ngenla®) (Pfizer, New York, United States) and lonapegsomatropin/TransCon GH (Skytrofa®) (Ascendis Pharma, Copenhagen, Denmark), are also currently approved and available for the treatment of CGHD in several countries. In this review, we will consider the method of protraction, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and safety results of somapacitan in adult and pediatric trials and how these characteristics differ from those of the other aforementioned LAGHs. Additionally, the administration of somapacitan and timing of measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels are summarized. Information on administration, advice on missed doses, and clinical guidelines are discussed, as well as identifying which patients are suitable for somapacitan therapy, and how to monitor and adjust dosing whilst on therapy.

Lipidization as a tool toward peptide therapeutics

Peptides, as potential therapeutics continue to gain importance in the search for active substances for the treatment of numerous human diseases, some of which are, to this day, incurable. As potential therapeutic drugs, peptides have many favorable chemical and pharmacological properties, starting with their great diversity, through their high affinity for binding to all sort of natural receptors, and ending with the various pathways of their breakdown, which produces nothing but amino acids that are nontoxic to the body. Despite these and other advantages, however, they also have their pitfalls. One of these disadvantages is the very low stability of natural peptides. They have a short half-life and tend to be cleared from the organism very quickly. Their instability in the gastrointestinal tract, makes it impossible to administer peptidic drugs orally. To achieve the best pharmacologic effect, it is desirable to look for ways of modifying peptides that enable the use of these substances as pharmaceuticals. There are many ways to modify peptides. Herein we summarize the approaches that are currently in use, including lipidization, PEGylation, glycosylation and others, focusing on lipidization. We describe how individual types of lipidization are achieved and describe their advantages and drawbacks. Peptide modifications are performed with the goal of reaching a longer half-life, reducing immunogenicity and improving bioavailability. In the case of neuropeptides, lipidization aids their activity in the central nervous system after the peripheral administration. At the end of our review, we summarize all lipidized peptide-based drugs that are currently on the market.

A Versatile Platform to Generate Prodrugs with Rapid and Precise Albumin Hitchhiking and High Cargo Loading for Tumor-Targeted Chemotherapy

Due to its tumor homing and long serum half-life, albumin is an ideal drug carrier for chemotherapy. For endogenous albumin hitchhiking with high cargo loading, a trimeric albumin-binding domain (ABD), i.e., ABD-Tri is designed by fusing an ABD with high specificity and affinity for albumin to a self-trimerizing domain (Tri) with an additional cysteine residue. ABD-Tri is highly (40 mg L-1 ) expressed as soluble and trimeric proteins in Escherichia coli (E. coli). Once mixed together, ABD-Tri rapidly and specifically forms a stable complex with albumin under physiological conditions without obviously changing its receptor- and cell-binding and tumor-homing properties. Maleimide-modified prodrugs are highly effectively conjugated to ABD-Tri to produce homogenous ABD-Tri-prodrugs with triple cargo loading under physiological conditions by thiol-maleimide click chemistry. Unlike the maleimide moiety, which can only mediate time- and concentration-dependent albumin binding, ABD-Tri mediated fast (within several minutes) albumin binding of drugs even at extremely low concentrations (µg mL-1 ). Compared to maleimide-modified prodrugs, ABD-Tri-prodrugs exhibit better tumor homing and greater in vivo antitumor effect, indicating that conjugation of chemical drug to ABD-Tri outperforms maleimide modification for endogenous albumin hitchhiking. The results demonstrate that ABD-Tri may serve as a novel platform to produce albumin-binding prodrugs with high cargo-loading capacity for tumor-targeted chemotherapy.

Long-term Pegylated GH for Children With GH Deficiency: A Large, Prospective, Real-world Study

CONTEXT

The evidence of long-term polyethylene glycol recombinant human GH (PEG-rhGH) in pediatric GH deficiency (GHD) is limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of long-term PEG-rhGH in children with GHD in the real world, as well as to examine the effects of dose on patient outcomes.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational, posttrial study (NCT03290235).

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION

Children with GHD were enrolled from 81 centers in China in 4 individual clinical trials and received weekly 0.2 mg/kg/wk (high-dose) or 0.1 to <0.2 mg/kg/wk (low-dose) PEG-rhGH for 30 months.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Height SD score (Ht SDS) at 12, 24, and 36 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1170 children were enrolled in this posttrial study, with 642 patients in the high-dose subgroup and 528 in the low-dose subgroup. The Ht SDS improved significantly after treatment in the total population (P < 0.0001), with a mean change of 0.53 ± 0.30, 0.89 ± 0.48, 1.35 ± 0.63, 1.63 ± 0.75 at 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months, respectively. In addition, the changes in Ht SDS from baseline were significantly improved in the high-dose subgroup compared with the low-dose subgroup at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment (all P < 0.05). A total of 12 (1.03%) patients developed serious adverse events. There was no serious adverse event related to the treatment, and no AEs leading to treatment discontinuation or death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG-rhGH showed long-term effectiveness and safety in treating children with GHD. Both dose subgroups showed promising outcomes, whereas PEG-rhGH 0.2 mg/kg/wk might show additional benefit.

Comparing Dose-dependent Outcomes of Weekly and Daily Growth Hormone Therapy in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3123741/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a condition impacting children and adults, leading to low height and other health issues. The primary treatment is daily injections of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH), though they can be inconvenient and costly. These injections may also negatively impact treatment adherence and outcomes. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly growth hormone treatment vs daily growth hormone therapy in children with growth hormone insufficiency. Methods To examine the efficacy and safety of once-weekly and once-daily growth hormone treatment for children with growth hormone insufficiency, this meta-analysis followed PRISMA and Cochrane standards. RCTs and prospective cohort studies with children aged 0–18 diagnosed with GHD were considered eligible. We used the risk of bias 2 and the certainty of evidence using the Cochrane tools. Two authors independently assessed papers for eligibility and extracted data after conducting a thorough search of electronic resources. Height velocity, height standard deviation score, insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, and the incidence of adverse events were the primary outcomes. The Revman software version 5.4 was used for data synthesis, and heterogeneity was determined by I-squares greater than 60%. Results This meta-analysis and comprehensive review includes 14 randomized clinical trials and one study was cohort, including 1,322 children with growth hormone insufficiency. Weekly growth hormone treatment at dosages ranging from 0.11 to 0.25 mg enhanced a variety of growth outcomes, including increased height velocity dose (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.23–0.51; P < 0.001), height standard deviation scores chronological age (SMD= -0.10, 95% CI, -0.13–0.07; P < 0.001), and insulin-like growth factor 1 standard deviation score (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.40–0.42; P < 0.001). The dosage range of 0.26 to 0.50 mg also improved insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 significantly (SMD= -0.63, 95% CI, -0.90 – -0.37; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of adverse events through the dosage levels (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.40; P = 0.32). Conclusions In children with growth hormone deficit, weekly growth hormone treatment, particularly in the 0.11 to 0.25 mg dose range, can function as a viable alternative to daily growth hormone therapy.

Somapacitan in children born small for gestational age: a multi-centre, open-label, controlled phase 2 study

OBJECTIVE

Investigate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 once-weekly somapacitan doses compared with daily growth hormone (GH) administration in short children born small for gestational age (SGA).

DESIGN

Randomised, multi-centre, open-label, controlled phase 2 study comprising a 26-week main phase and a 4-year extension (NCT03878446). The study was conducted at 38 sites across 12 countries. 26-week main phase results are presented here.Sixty-two GH treatment-naïve, prepubertal short children born SGA were randomised and exposed; 61 completed the main phase. Three somapacitan doses (0.16 [n = 12], 0.20 [n = 13], 0.24 [n = 12] mg/kg/week) and 2 daily GH doses (0.035 [n = 12], 0.067 [n = 13] mg/kg/day) were administered subcutaneously.

RESULTS

After 26 weeks of treatment, the estimated mean annualised height velocity (HV) was 8.9, 11.0, and 11.3 cm/year for somapacitan 0.16, 0.20, and 0.24 mg/kg/week, respectively, compared to 10.3 and 11.9 cm/year for daily GH 0.035 and 0.067 mg/kg/day. Changes from baseline in HV standard deviation score (SDS), height SDS, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) SDS showed similar dose-dependent responses. Exposure-response modelling indicated the greatest efficacy correlated with the highest somapacitan exposure. Similar safety and tolerability were demonstrated for all weekly somapacitan and daily GH doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the totality of data on improvements in height-based parameters combined with exposure-response analyses, somapacitan 0.24 mg/kg/week appears most efficacious, providing similar efficacy, safety, and tolerability as daily GH 0.067 mg/kg/day in short children born SGA after 26 weeks of treatment.

Derivatization with fatty acids in peptide and protein drug discovery

Peptides and proteins are widely used to treat a range of medical conditions; however, they often have to be injected and their effects are short-lived. These shortcomings of the native structure can be addressed by molecular engineering, but this is a complex undertaking. A molecular engineering technology initially applied to insulin - and which has now been successfully applied to several biopharmaceuticals - entails the derivatization of peptides and proteins with fatty acids. Various protraction mechanisms are enabled by the specific characteristics and positions of the attached fatty acid. Furthermore, the technology can ensure a long half-life following oral administration of peptide drugs, can alter the distribution of peptides and may hold potential for tissue targeting. Due to the inherent safety and well-defined chemical nature of the fatty acids, this technology provides a versatile approach to peptide and protein drug discovery.

Weekly Somapacitan is Effective and Well Tolerated in Children With GH Deficiency: The Randomized Phase 3 REAL4 Trial

CONTEXT

Somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, is evaluated in children with GH deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate efficacy and safety of somapacitan vs daily GH.

METHODS

REAL4 is a randomised, multinational, open-labeled, active-controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main trial and 3-year extension (NCT03811535).

SETTING

Eighty-six sites across 20 countries.

PATIENTS

200 treatment-naïve patients were randomized and exposed.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (Norditropin; 0.034 mg/kg/d), administered subcutaneously.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was annualized height velocity (HV; cm/y) at week 52. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, bone age, IGF-I SDS, patient-reported outcomes, and safety measures.

RESULTS

Estimated mean HV at week 52 was 11.2 and 11.7 cm/y for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively. Noninferiority was confirmed. Changes in HV SDS, height SDS, bone age, and IGF-I SDS from baseline to week 52 were similar between treatment groups. At week 52, mean IGF-I SDS values were similar between treatment groups and within normal range (-2 to +2). Safety of somapacitan was consistent with the well-known daily GH profile. Low proportions of injection-site reactions were reported for somapacitan (5.3%) and daily GH (5.9%). Both treatments similarly reduced disease burden from baseline to week 52, whereas a greater treatment burden reduction was observed for somapacitan.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar efficacy for somapacitan compared to daily GH was demonstrated over 52 weeks of treatment with comparable safety and mean IGF-I SDS levels in treatment-naïve children with GHD.

Effective GH Replacement With Once-weekly Somapacitan vs Daily GH in Children with GHD: 3-year Results From REAL 3

CONTEXT

Current GH therapy requires daily injections, which can be burdensome. Somapacitan is a long-acting GH derivative in development for treatment of GH deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-weekly somapacitan after 3 years of treatment.

DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase 2 study comparing somapacitan and once-daily GH for 156 weeks (NCT02616562).

SETTING

Twenty-nine sites in 11 countries.

PATIENTS

Fifty-nine children with GHD randomized (1:1:1:1) and exposed to treatment. Fifty-three children completed the 3-year period.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received somapacitan (0.04 [n = 14], 0.08 [n = 15], or 0.16 [n = 14] mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (n = 14) (0.034 mg/kg/d, equivalent to 0.238 mg/kg/wk) subcutaneously during the first year, after which all patients on somapacitan received 0.16 mg/kg/wk.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Height velocity (HV) at year 3; changes from baseline in height SD score (HSDS), HVSDS, and IGF-I SDS.

RESULTS

The estimated treatment difference (95% CI) in HV for somapacitan 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk vs daily GH at year 3 was 0.8 cm/y (-0.4 to 2.1). Change in HVSDS from baseline to year 3 was comparable between somapacitan 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk, the pooled somapacitan groups, and daily GH. A gradual increase in HSDS from baseline was observed for all groups. At year 3, mean HSDS was similar for the pooled somapacitan groups and daily GH. Change from baseline to year 3 in mean IGF-I SDS was similar across treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-weekly somapacitan in children with GHD showed sustained efficacy over 3 years in all assessed height-based outcomes with similar safety and tolerability to daily GH. A plain language summary (1) is available for this study.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02616562 (REAL 3).

Structure identification of circulating metabolites from somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone derivative, and pharmacokinetics after single and multiple subcutaneous dosing in rats

Somapacitan is a growth hormone derivative approved for once-weekly treatment of growth hormone deficiency in adults and currently in clinical development for once-weekly dosing in children. The purpose of this study was to obtain non-clinical data from rats to support the safety evaluation of the most abundant metabolites of somapacitan in humans. The aims were to identify somapacitan metabolites and their relative proportions in rat plasma, identify the structure of abundant metabolites and measure the systemic metabolite exposure at the no-observed-adverse-effect level in the rat. After a single dose of radiolabelled somapacitan and analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography with radiochemical detection, seven somapacitan-related metabolites were detected in plasma from male rats, of which six were seen in plasma from female rats. The three most abundant metabolites (M1, M2 and M3) were structurally identified from liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry data, and a fourth metabolite (P1) was characterised from its specific retention time (lacking retention to the stationary phase) in plasma analysis with reversed-phase liquid chromatography and radiochemical detection. The metabolites were products from proteolysis of the peptide backbone in somapacitan. A deamidation product of the M1 metabolite (M1B) was also identified. Following multiple, twice-weekly dosing for 4 weeks, somapacitan was the principal plasma component up to 36 h after dosing. After 36 h, metabolites M1+M1B were the most abundant plasma components. Pharmacokinetic models were developed for somapacitan and metabolite P1 and used for steady-state assessment in the rat. Comparison of our data generated from rats with data from the parallel human study demonstrated that the most abundant metabolites were present in rats at higher levels than in humans. This study has provided non-clinical safety data that contribute to an overall safety assessment of somapacitan.

Absorption, metabolism and excretion of once-weekly somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone derivative, after single subcutaneous dosing in human subjects

Somapacitan is a reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative in clinical development for once-weekly administration in patients with adult GH deficiency (AGHD) and children with GH deficiency (GHD). To date, the use of somapacitan in AGHD or severe AGHD has been approved in the USA and Japan, respectively. This study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02962440) investigated the absorption, metabolism and excretion, as well as the pharmacokinetics (PK), of tritium-labelled somapacitan ([³H]-somapacitan). Seven healthy males received a single subcutaneous dose of 6 mg somapacitan containing [³H]-somapacitan 20 MBq. Blood, serum, plasma, urine, faeces, and expired air were collected for radioactivity assessment. Metabolites were identified and quantified in plasma and urine collected. The PK of plasma components were determined, and the radioactive peaks of the most abundant plasma metabolites and urine metabolites were selected for analysis. Twenty-eight days after dosing, 94.0% of the administered dose was recovered as [³H]-somapacitan-related material, most of which was excreted in urine (80.9%); 12.9% was excreted in faeces, and an insignificant amount (0.2%) was exhaled in expired air. PK properties of [³H]-somapacitan-related material appeared to be consistent across plasma, serum and blood. Three abundant plasma metabolites (P1, M1 and M1B) and two abundant urine metabolites (M4 and M5) were identified. The total exposure of intact somapacitan accounted for 59% of the total exposure of all somapacitan-related material, P1 accounted for 21% and M1 plus M1B accounted for 12%. M4 and M5 were the most abundant urine metabolites and accounted for 37% and 8% of the dosed [³H]-somapacitan radioactivity, respectively. No intact somapacitan was found in excreta. Two subjects had six adverse events (AEs); all were mild in severity and unlikely to be related to trial product. The majority of dosed [³H]-somapacitan (94%) was recovered as excreted metabolites. Urine was the major route for excretion of somapacitan metabolites, followed by faeces, and exhalation in expired air was negligible. The low molecular weights of identified urine metabolites demonstrate that somapacitan was extensively degraded to small residual fragments that were excreted (fully biodegradable). The extensive metabolic degradation and full elimination of metabolites in excreta were the major clearance pathways of somapacitan and the key elements in its biological fate. A single dose of 6 mg somapacitan (containing [³H]-somapacitan) in healthy male subjects was well tolerated with no unexpected safety issues identified.

Effect of Weekly Long-Acting Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy Compared to Daily Growth Hormone on Children With Short Stature: A Meta-Analysis

Background

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy compared to daily growth hormone in children with short stature.

Methods

A systematic literature search up to April 2021 was performed and 11 studies included 1,232 children with short stature treated with growth hormone replacement therapy at the start of the study; 737 of them were using weekly long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy and 495 were using daily growth hormone. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy and daily growth hormone in children with short stature. We calculated the odds ratio (OR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the efficacy and safety of weekly long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy compared to daily growth hormone in children with short stature using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model.

Results

Long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy had significantly lower height standard deviation scores chronological age (MD, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.08, p <0.001), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (MD, -0.69; 95% CI, -1.09 to -0.30, p <0.001) compared to daily growth hormone in children with short stature.However, growth hormone replacement therapy had no significantly difference in height velocity (MD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.69-0.5, p = 0.76), height standard deviation scores bone age (MD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.10-0.02, p = 0.16), insulin-like growth factor 1 standard deviation scores (MD, 0.26; 95% CI, -0.26-0.79, p = 0.33), and incidence of adverse events (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.90-1.50, p = 0.25) compared to daily growth hormone in children with short stature.

Conclusions

Long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy had significantly lower height standard deviation scores chronological age, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 compared to daily growth hormone in children with short stature. However, growth hormone replacement therapy had no significant difference in height velocity, height standard deviation scores bone age, insulin-like growth factor 1 standard deviation scores, and incidence of adverse events compared to daily growth hormone in children with short stature. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Development of a Predictive Enrichment Marker for the Oral GH Secretagogue LUM-201 in Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency

Context

We hypothesize, based on the degree of residual hypothalamic-pituitary function, that some, but not all, children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) may have beneficial growth responses to the orally administered growth hormone (GH) secretagogue LUM-201.

Objective

To determine if pretreatment testing can identify predictive enrichment markers (PEM) for subjects with adequate residual function who are responsive to LUM-201.

Methods

We performed an analysis of a completed, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of LUM-201, a GH secretagogue receptor agonist, in which all randomized subjects had pretreatment testing.

This international multicenter study conducted in pediatric endocrinology clinics included 68 naïve-to-treatment, prepubertal children with established diagnoses of GHD. Outcome measures included the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of potential markers to predict 6-month growth responses to oral LUM-201 and daily rhGH.

Results

Two PEM were identified for use in defining PEM-positive status: (1) baseline insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentration >30 ng/mL and (2) peak GH response of ≥5 ng/mL upon administration of single-dose LUM-201. PEM-positive status enriches a population for better growth responses to LUM-201. PEM-negative status enriches a population for better growth responses to rhGH.

Conclusion

Combined, the peak GH response to single-dose LUM-201 and the baseline IGF-I concentration are effective PEMs for 6-month growth responses to LUM-201 and rhGH in prepubertal children with GHD.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Once-Daily Growth Hormone Norditropin® in Children and Adults

Background and Objective

Once-daily injectable recombinant human growth hormone (GH) formulations (e.g. Norditropin^®; Novo Nordisk A/S) are used to treat GH deficiency in children and adults, with much of the therapeutic effect mediated via the insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) response. Despite a long history of use, there are few data on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (serum IGF-I response) of this therapy, or of potential differences in the relationship of GH pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) effects between children and adults. This study aimed to characterise the GH pharmacokinetics and IGF-I profile following daily subcutaneous GH in adults and children with GH deficiency.

Methods

A model was developed based on a population PK/PD modelling meta-analysis of data from three phase I clinical trials (two using Norditropin^® as a comparator with somapacitan, and one as a comparator with a pegylated GH product). Sequential model building was performed, first developing a model that could describe GH pharmacokinetics. A PD model of IGF-I data was then developed using PK and PD data, and where all PK parameters were kept fixed to those estimated in the PK model.

Results

The model developed accurately describes and predicts GH pharmacokinetics and IGF-I response. Body weight was shown to have an important inversely correlated influence on GH exposure (and IGF-I standard deviation score), and this largely explained differences between adults and children.

Conclusions

The pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics developed here can inform expectations about the PD effects of different doses of GH in patients with GH deficiency of different body weights, regardless of their age.

Clinical Trial Registration

Pooled modelling analysis of data from ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT01973244, NCT00936403 and NCT01706783.

Dates of registration

NCT01973244: 22 October, 2013; NCT00936403: 9 July, 2009; NCT01706783: 11 October, 2012.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-021-01011-3.

Effect of Kidney or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Somapacitan: Two Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trials

INTRODUCTION

Somapacitan is a long-acting growth hormone (GH) derivative being developed for once-weekly dosing in patients with GH deficiency (GHD). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of kidney or hepatic impairment on somapacitan exposure in adults.

METHODS

In two open-label, parallel-group, single-center, 6-week trials, eligible subjects (18-75 years of age, body mass index 18.5-34.9 kg/m², GH-naïve, without GHD) were divided into five kidney (total n = 44) or three hepatic (n = 34) function groups. Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight. Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15. Blood samples were collected before each dose, at 28 time points throughout 2 weeks after the last dose, and at follow-up (3-4 weeks after the last dose). The primary endpoint was area under the somapacitan serum concentration-time curve up to 1 week after the last dose (AUC_0-168 h), while secondary endpoints included AUC_0-168 h of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I.

RESULTS

In the kidney impairment trial, somapacitan AUC_0-168 h was higher in groups with severe kidney impairment and requiring hemodialysis versus the normal kidney function group (estimated ratio and 90% confidence interval 1.75 [1.00-3.06] and 1.63 [1.01-2.61], respectively). AUC_0-168 h of IGF-I was increased in the moderate impairment group (1.35 [1.09-1.66]), severe impairment group (1.40 [1.10-1.78]), and requiring hemodialysis group (1.24 [1.01-1.52]), compared with the normal function group. In the hepatic impairment trial, somapacitan AUC_0-168 h was significantly higher in the moderate impairment group compared with the normal hepatic function group (4.69 [2.92-7.52]). IGF-I AUC_0-168 h was lower in both hepatic impairment groups (0.85 [0.67-1.08] for the mild impairment group and 0.75 [0.60-0.95] for the moderate impairment group) compared with the normal function group. No new safety or tolerability issues were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, somapacitan exposure increased with level of kidney/hepatic impairment. Clinically, this will be taken into account when treating adults with GHD with somapacitan, as doses should be individually titrated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03186495 (kidney impairment trial, registered 12 June 2017); NCT03212131 (hepatic impairment trial, registered 30 June 2017).

Optimal Monitoring of Weekly IGF-I Levels During Growth Hormone Therapy With Once-Weekly Somapacitan

CONTEXT

Somapacitan is a long-acting growth hormone (GH) in development for once-weekly treatment of GH deficiency (GHD). Optimal monitoring of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels must account for weekly IGF-I fluctuations following somapacitan administration.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and assess the reliability of linear models for predicting mean and peak IGF-I levels from samples taken on different days after dosing.

DESIGN

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate IGF-I data in adults and children following weekly somapacitan treatment of GHD.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

39 200 IGF-I profiles were simulated with reference to data from 26 adults and 23 children with GHD.

INTERVENTION(S)

The simulated dose range was 0.02 to 0.12 mg/kg for adults and 0.02 to 0.16 mg/kg for children. Simulated data with >4 average standard deviation score were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Linear models for predicting mean and peak IGF-I levels based on IGF-I samples from different days after somapacitan dose.

RESULTS

Robust linear relationships were found between IGF-I sampled on any day after somapacitan dose and the weekly mean (R2 > 0.94) and peak (R2 > 0.84). Prediction uncertainties were generally low when predicting mean from samples taken on any day (residual standard deviation [RSD] ≤ 0.36) and peak from samples taken on day 1 to 4 (RSD ≤ 0.34). IGF-I monitoring on day 4 and day 2 after dose provided the most accurate estimate of IGF-I mean (RSD < 0.2) and peak (RSD < 0.1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Linear models provided a simple and reliable tool to aid optimal monitoring of IGF-I by predicting mean and peak IGF-I levels based on an IGF-I sample following dosing of somapacitan. A short visual summary of our work is available (1).

Prediction of Half-Life Extension of Peptides via Serum Albumin Binding: Current Challenges

The development of peptide therapeutics has increased enormously in recent decades. Many of the peptide drugs and antibody fragments that lack Fc backbone have a short half-life in circulation. In general, the half-life supports the design of the dosing regimen and frequency of administration, which are key aspects in the discovery of peptide drugs intended for long duration of action. Less frequent administration such as weekly or monthly can improve compliance and adherence to therapy. Serum albumin binding is a key approach to extend the half-life of peptide drugs. Despite the evidence of half-life prolongation of a variety of peptide drugs via albumin, quantitative prediction for humans is still a key question. Challenges in the measurement of albumin binding and in understanding the clearance mechanisms can limit quantitative prediction. We integrated pharmacokinetic concepts and albumin binding across species in a quantitative model to be used as a tool for prediction of half-life. Preliminary validation on a limited dataset indicated a good correlation between predicted and observed values. Further development of more quantitative models is warranted.

Usefulness and Potential Pitfalls of Long-Acting Growth Hormone Analogs

Daily recombinant human GH (rhGH) is currently approved for use in children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD) in many countries with relatively few side-effects. Nevertheless, daily injections can be painful and distressing for some patients, often resulting in non-adherence and reduction of treatment outcomes. This has prompted the development of numerous long-acting GH (LAGH) analogs that allow for decreased injection frequency, ranging from weekly, bi-weekly to monthly. These LAGH analogs are attractive as they may theoretically offer increased patient acceptance, tolerability, and therapeutic flexibility. Conversely, there may also be pitfalls to these LAGH analogs, including an unphysiological GH profile and differing molecular structures that pose potential clinical issues in terms of dose initiation, therapeutic monitoring, incidence and duration of side-effects, and long-term safety. Furthermore, fluctuations of peak and trough serum GH and IGF-I levels and variations in therapeutic efficacy may depend on the technology used to prolong GH action. Previous studies of some LAGH analogs have demonstrated non-inferiority compared to daily rhGH in terms of increased growth velocity and improved body composition in children and adults with GHD, respectively, with no significant unanticipated adverse events. Currently, two LAGH analogs are marketed in Asia, one recently approved in the United States, another previously approved but not marketed in Europe, and several others proceeding through various stages of clinical development. Nevertheless, several practical questions still remain, including possible differences in dose initiation between naïve and switch-over patients, methodology of dose adjustment/s, timing of measuring serum IGF-I levels, safety, durability of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Long-term surveillance of safety and efficacy of LAGH analogs are needed to answer these important questions.

Similar safety and efficacy in previously treated adults with growth hormone deficiency randomized to once-weekly somapacitan or daily growth hormone

OBJECTIVE

Somapacitan is a long-acting, reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative in development. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-weekly somapacitan versus daily GH over 52 weeks in Japanese patients with adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD).

DESIGN

Phase 3, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, active-controlled trial (NCT03075644).

PATIENTS

Previously GH-treated Japanese patients with AGHD were randomized 3:1 to somapacitan (n = 46) or daily GH (n = 16) for 20 weeks' dose titration and 32 weeks' fixed-dose treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 52 in visceral, subcutaneous and total adipose tissue (VAT, SAT and TAT).

RESULTS

Mean (SD) prescribed doses after titration were 1.780 (1.058) mg/week for somapacitan and 0.197 (0.083) mg/day for daily GH. Rate of AEs per 100 patient-years was similar between arms (somapacitan, 312.7; daily GH, 309.8). Four AEs in the somapacitan arm were serious; none were considered treatment-related. Mean insulin-like growth factor-I standard deviation score (IGF-I SDS) was maintained from baseline in both arms. No significant differences were observed between arms for change from baseline to week 52 in VAT, SAT or TAT (estimated difference, somapacitan - daily GH [95% CI]: -1.74 [-18.13; 14.66], -11.53 [-35.54; 12.48] and - 12.85 [-47.31; 21.62] cm² , respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment in both groups was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings. Impact on adipose tissue was similar to somapacitan and daily GH in patients with AGHD. A short visual summary of our work is available at https://bit.ly/3946YNF.

Association between Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 and Relative Skeletal Maturation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Short Children and Adolescents

Objective

Delays in skeletal maturity are related to bone mass and fracture risk in children, but the factors that determine it are unknown. We aimed to identify the association between insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and skeletal maturation before and after growth hormone (GH) treatment.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we observed 783 short children and adolescents, 229 of whom received GH therapy. Skeletal maturation was assessed based on the difference between bone age (BA) and chronological age (CA) (noted as BA-CA). Anthropometric data and laboratory values were measured, and BA was evaluated using the Greulich and Pyle method.

Results

The delayed BA group was defined as BA‐CA < −2 SD (n = 457), and the occurrence rate of BA delay was 58.37%. A nonlinear relationship was observed between the IGF-1 standard deviation score (IGF-1 SDS) and BA-CA before and after GH therapy. Before GH therapy, there was a significant positive association between the IGF-1 SDS and BA-CA when the IGF-1 level was greater than -2 SDS (β 0.17, 95% CI 0.08, 027; P < 0.001). However, we did not observe a significant relationship between the IGF-1 SDS and BA-CA when the IGF-1 level was lower than -2 SDS (β 0.07, 95% CI -0.12, 0.26; P = 0.454). After GH therapy, there was a significant positive association between the IGF-1 SDS and BA-CA when the IGF-1 level was lower than 2 SDS (β 0.20, 95% CI 0.12, 028; P < 0.001). However, we did not observe a significant relationship between the IGF-1 SDS and BA-CA when the IGF-1 level was greater than 2 SDS (β -0.03, 95% CI -0.33, 0.27; P = 0.866).

Conclusion

BA is more delayed in short children and adolescents. There is a nonlinear relationship between IGF-1 and BA maturation in short children before and after GH treatment. These findings suggest that a low level of IGF-1 may contribute to BA delay in short children and adolescents.

Long-Acting Growth Hormone Preparations - Current Status and Future Considerations

CONTEXT

Long-acting GH (LAGH) preparations are currently being developed in an attempt to improve adherence. The profile of GH action following administration of LAGH raises practical questions about clinical monitoring and long-term safety and efficacy of these new therapeutic agents.

METHODS

Recent literature and meeting proceedings regarding LAGH preparations are reviewed.

RESULTS

Multiple LAGH preparations are currently at various stages of development, allowing for decreased GH injection frequency from daily to weekly, biweekly, or monthly. Following administration of LAGH, the serum peak and trough GH and IGF-I levels vary depending upon the mechanism used to prolong GH action. Randomized, controlled clinical trials of some LAGH preparations have reported non-inferiority compared with daily recombinant human GH (rhGH) for improved growth velocity and body composition in children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD), respectively. No significant LAGH-related adverse events have been reported during short-term therapy.

CONCLUSION

Multiple LAGH preparations are proceeding through clinical development with some showing promising evidence of short-term clinical efficacy and safety in children and adults with GHD. The relationship of transient elevations of GH and IGF-I following administration of LAGH to efficacy and safety remain to be elucidated. For LAGH to replace daily rhGH in the treatment of individuals with GHD, a number of practical questions need to be addressed including methods of dose adjustment, timing of monitoring of IGF-I, safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Long-term surveillance of efficacy and safety of LAGH preparations will be needed to answer these clinically relevant questions.

Once-Weekly Somapacitan vs Daily GH in Children With GH Deficiency: Results From a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

CONTEXT

Daily growth hormone (GH) injections can be burdensome for patients and carers. Somapacitan is a long-acting, reversible albumin-binding GH derivative in development for once-weekly administration in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-weekly somapacitan vs once-daily GH.

DESIGN

REAL 3 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind (somapacitan doses), phase 2 study with a 26-week main and 26-week extension phase (NCT02616562).

SETTING

This study took place at 29 sites in 11 countries.

PATIENTS

Fifty-nine GH treatment-naive prepubertal children with GHD were randomly assigned; 58 completed the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Interventions comprised 3 somapacitan doses (0.04 [n = 16], 0.08 [n = 15], or 0.16 mg/kg/wk [n = 14]) and daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/d [n = 14]), administered subcutaneously.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was height velocity (HV) at week 26. Secondary efficacy end points included HV SD score (SDS) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) SDS.

RESULTS

At week 26, mean (SD) annualized HV for the somapacitan groups was 8.0 (2.0), 10.9 (1.9), and 12.9 (3.5) cm/year, respectively, vs 11.4 (3.3) cm/year for daily GH; estimated treatment difference (somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week-daily GH): 1.7 [95% CI -0.2 to 3.6] cm/year. HV was sustained at week 52, and significantly greater with somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week vs daily GH. Mean (SD) change from baseline in HV SDS at week 52 was 4.72 (2.79), 6.14 (3.36), and 8.60 (3.15) for the somapacitan groups, respectively, vs 7.41 (4.08) for daily GH. Model-derived mean (SD) IGF-I SDS for the somapacitan groups was -1.62 (0.86), -1.09 (0.78), and 0.31 (1.06), respectively, vs -0.40 (1.50) observed for daily GH. Safety and tolerability were consistent with the profile of daily GH.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with GHD, once-weekly somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week provided the closest efficacy match with similar safety and tolerability to daily GH after 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. A short visual summary of our work is available (1).

Once-weekly Somapacitan is Effective and Well Tolerated in Adults with GH Deficiency: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial

CONTEXT

Growth hormone (GH) replacement requires daily GH injections, which is burdensome for some adult patients with GH deficiency (AGHD).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate efficacy and safety of somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, versus placebo in AGHD.

DESIGN

Randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) phase 3 trial, REAL 1 (NCT02229851).

SETTING

Clinics in 17 countries.

PATIENTS

Treatment-naïve patients with AGHD (n = 301 main study period, 272 extension period); 257 patients completed the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to once-weekly somapacitan, daily GH, or once-weekly placebo for 34 weeks (main period). During the 52-week extension period, patients continued treatment with somapacitan or daily GH.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Body composition measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The primary endpoint was change in truncal fat percentage to week 34. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) standard deviation score (SDS) values were used to dose titrate.

RESULTS

At 34 weeks, somapacitan significantly reduced truncal fat percentage (estimated difference: -1.53% [-2.68; -0.38]; P = 0.0090), demonstrating superiority compared with placebo, and it improved other body composition parameters (including visceral fat and lean body mass) and IGF-I SDS. At 86 weeks, improvements were maintained with both somapacitan and daily GH. Somapacitan was well tolerated, with similar adverse events (including injection-site reactions) compared with daily GH.

CONCLUSIONS

In AGHD patients, somapacitan administered once weekly demonstrated superiority over placebo, and the overall treatment effects and safety of somapacitan were in accordance with known effects and safety of GH replacement for up to 86 weeks of treatment. Somapacitan may provide an effective alternative to daily GH in AGHD. A short visual summary of our work is available (1).

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Once-Weekly Somapacitan in Children and Adults: Supporting Dosing Rationales with a Model-Based Analysis of Three Phase I Trials

Background

Somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone (GH) derivative, has been well-tolerated in children with GH deficiency (GHD) and adults (healthy and adult GHD), in phase I, single- and multiple-dose trials, respectively, and has pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties supporting a once-weekly dosing regimen.

Objective

In the absence of a multiple-dose phase I trial in children with GHD, the aim was to develop a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to predict somapacitan exposure and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) response after once-weekly multiple doses in both children and adults with GHD.

Methods

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models were developed from pharmacokinetic and IGF-I profiles in three phase I trials of somapacitan (doses: healthy adults, 0.01–0.32 mg/kg; adult with GHD, 0.02−0.12 mg/kg; children with GHD, 0.02–0.16 mg/kg) using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. Pharmacokinetics were described using a non-linear one-compartment model with dual first- and zero-order absorption through a transit compartment, with saturable elimination. IGF-I profiles were described using an indirect response pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, with sigmoidal-effect relationship.

Results

The non-linear pharmacokinetic and IGF-I data were well-described in order to confidently predict pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles after multiple doses in adults and children with GHD. Body weight was found to be a significant covariate, predictive of the differences observed in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics between children and adults. Weekly dosing of somapacitan provided elevated IGF-I levels throughout the week, despite little or no accumulation of somapacitan, in both adults and children with GHD.

Conclusion

This analysis of somapacitan pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data supports once-weekly dosing in adults and children with GHD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers NCT01514500, NCT01706783, NCT01973244.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40262-018-0662-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY IN ADULTS AND PATIENTS TRANSITIONING FROM PEDIATRIC TO ADULT CARE

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2019 updated guideline contains 58 numbered recommendations: 12 are Grade A (21%), 19 are Grade B (33%), 21 are Grade C (36%), and 6 are Grade D (10%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 357 citations of which 51 (14%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (strong), 168 (47%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 61 (17%) are EL 3 (weak), and 77 (22%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence). Conclusion: This CPG is a practical tool that practicing endocrinologists and regulatory bodies can refer to regarding the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of adults and patients transitioning from pediatric to adult-care services with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). It provides guidelines on assessment, screening, diagnostic testing, and treatment recommendations for a range of individuals with various causes of adult GHD. The recommendations emphasize the importance of considering testing patients with a reasonable level of clinical suspicion of GHD using appropriate growth hormone (GH) cut-points for various GH-stimulation tests to accurately diagnose adult GHD, and to exercise caution interpreting serum GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, as various GH and IGF-1 assays are used to support treatment decisions. The intention to treat often requires sound clinical judgment and careful assessment of the benefits and risks specific to each individual patient. Unapproved uses of GH, long-term safety, and the current status of long-acting GH preparations are also discussed in this document. LAY ABSTRACT This updated guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification, screening, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for a range of individuals with various causes of adult growth-hormone deficiency (GHD) and patients with childhood-onset GHD transitioning to adult care. The update summarizes the most current knowledge about the accuracy of available GH-stimulation tests, safety of recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement, unapproved uses of rhGH related to sports and aging, and new developments such as long-acting GH preparations that use a variety of technologies to prolong GH action. Recommendations offer a framework for physicians to manage patients with GHD effectively during transition to adult care and adulthood. Establishing a correct diagnosis is essential before consideration of replacement therapy with rhGH. Since the diagnosis of GHD in adults can be challenging, GH-stimulation tests are recommended based on individual patient circumstances and use of appropriate GH cut-points. Available GH-stimulation tests are discussed regarding variability, accuracy, reproducibility, safety, and contraindications, among other factors. The regimen for starting and maintaining rhGH treatment now uses individualized dose adjustments, which has improved effectiveness and reduced reported side effects, dependent on age, gender, body mass index, and various other individual characteristics. With careful dosing of rhGH replacement, many features of adult GHD are reversible and side effects of therapy can be minimized. Scientific studies have consistently shown rhGH therapy to be beneficial for adults with GHD, including improvements in body composition and quality of life, and have demonstrated the safety of short- and long-term rhGH replacement. Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AHSG = alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein; AO-GHD = adult-onset growth hormone deficiency; ARG = arginine; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; CO-GHD = childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CRP = C-reactive protein; DM = diabetes mellitus; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; FD-GST = fixed-dose glucagon stimulation test; GeNeSIS = Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study; GH = growth hormone; GHD = growth hormone deficiency; GHRH = growth hormone-releasing hormone; GST = glucagon stimulation test; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HypoCCS = Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP = insulin-like growth factor-binding protein; IGHD = isolated growth hormone deficiency; ITT = insulin tolerance test; KIMS = Kabi International Metabolic Surveillance; LAGH = long-acting growth hormone; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LIF = leukemia inhibitory factor; MPHD = multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; P-III-NP = procollagen type-III amino-terminal pro-peptide; PHD = pituitary hormone deficiencies; QoL = quality of life; rhGH = recombinant human growth hormone; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; RR = relative risk; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; SDS = standard deviation score; SIR = standardized incidence ratio; SN = secondary neoplasms; T3 = triiodothyronine; TBI = traumatic brain injury; VDBP = vitamin D-binding protein; WADA = World Anti-Doping Agency; WB-GST = weight-based glucagon stimulation test.

Adult growth hormone deficiency: clinical advances and approaches to improve adherence

Introduction: There have been significant clinical advances in the understanding of the diagnosis and benefits of long-term recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement in adults with GH deficiency (GHD) since its approval in 1996 by the United States Food and Drug Administration.Areas covered: We searched PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsychInfo databases between January 2000 and June 2019 for published studies evaluating adults with GHD. We reviewed the data of the oral macimorelin test compared to the GHRH plus arginine and the insulin tolerance tests that led to its approval by the United States FDA and European Medicines Agency for adult diagnostic testing. We summarize the clinical advances of long-term benefits of rhGH therapy and the potential effects of GH receptor polymorphisms on individual treatment responsiveness. We identify that non-adherence and discontinuation rates are high and recommend strategies to support patients to improve adherence. We also provide an overview of several long-acting GH (LAGH) preparations currently under development and their potential role in improving treatment adherence.Expert opinion: This article summarizes recent clinical advances in rhGH replacement therapy, the biological and molecular aspects that may influence rhGH action, and offers practical strategies to enhance adherence in adults with GHD.

Perspectives on long-acting growth hormone therapy in children and adults

Growth hormone therapy with daily injections of recombinant human growth hormone has been available since 1985, and is shown to be safe and effective treatment for short stature in children and for adult growth hormone deficiency. In an effort to produce a product that would improve patient adherence, there has been a strong effort from industry to create a long acting form of growth hormone to ease the burden of use. Technologies used to increase half-life include depot formulations, PEGylated formulations, pro-drug formulations, non-covalent albumin binding growth hormone and growth hormone fusion proteins. At present, two long acting formulations are on the market in China and South Korea, and several more promising agents are under clinical investigation at various stages of development throughout the world. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):601-7.

Efficacy and safety of long-acting growth hormone in children with short stature: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Long-acting growth hormone (GH) has been developed to address the noncompliance and decreased efficacy associated with daily GH injections. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-acting GH replacement therapy in children with short stature.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy and safety of long-acting GH therapy in children with short stature in comparison with daily GH injections were searched in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A random-effect model was used to pool data using mean difference and odds ratios (OR). (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018111105).

RESULTS

Seven relevant studies were finally included. Meta-analysis found there was no significant difference between high-dose long-acting GH and daily GH in terms of height velocity (HV) (mean difference (MD) = -0.10, 95% CI, -0.79 to 0.60, P = 0.79). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in height standard deviation scores (Ht SDS) between high-dose long-acting GH and daily GH (MD = -0.07, 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.03, P = 0.17). Treatment with high-dose long-acting GH significantly increased IGF-1 SDS when compared with daily GH (MD = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.06-0.56, P = 0.02). In safety assessment, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse events between high-dose long-acting GH and daily GH (OR 1.42, 95% CI, 0.65-3.11, P = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support differences in the effects of long-acting GH compared with those of daily GH. More RCTs that focus on the safety of high-dose long-acting GH treatment, especially the detection of adverse events caused by elevated levels of serum IGF-1, are needed in the future.

Long-Acting Growth Hormone Preparations in the Treatment of Children

Human growth hormone (hGH), which had been in use since 1958, was supplanted by recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in 1985 for those with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Adherence to daily subcutaneous growth hormone is challenging for patients. Thus, several companies have pursued the creation of long acting rhGH. These agents can be divided broadly into depot formulations, PEGylated formulations, pro-drug formulations, non-covalent albumin binding GH and GH fusion proteins. Nutropin Depot is the only long acting rhGH ever approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and it was removed from the market in 2004. Of the approximately seventeen candidate drugs, only a handful remain under active clinical investigation or are commercially available.

A review of lipidation in the development of advanced protein and peptide therapeutics

The use of biologics (peptide and protein based drugs) has increased significantly over the past few decades. However, their development has been limited by their short half-life, immunogenicity and low membrane permeability, restricting most therapies to extracellular targets and administration by injection. Lipidation is a clinically-proven post-translational modification that has shown great promise to address these issues: improving half-life, reducing immunogenicity and enabling intracellular uptake and delivery across epithelia. Despite its great potential, lipidation remains an underutilized strategy in the clinical translation of lead biologics. We review how lipidation can overcome common challenges in biologics development as well as highlight gaps in our understanding of the effect of lipidation on therapeutic efficacy, where increased research and development efforts may lead to next-generation drugs.

The current state of long-acting growth hormone preparations for growth hormone therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the rationale of developing long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) preparations, to describe the technologies designed to prolong GH action, and to address key issues regarding efficacy, safety, and monitoring while on treatment.

REVIEW FINDINGS

Recombinant human GH is currently approved for daily use and has been shown to restore longitudinal growth, and improve body composition with relatively few side-effects in children and adults with GH deficiency, respectively. However, daily injections can be inconvenient, painful and distressing for some patients, resulting in decreased adherence and efficacy. Over a dozen pharmaceutical companies have designed LAGH preparations that are at various stages of development using a number of different methods to prolong GH action.

SUMMARY

LAGH will represent an advancement over daily recombinant human GH injections because of fewer injections that may offer increased acceptance, tolerability, and therapeutic flexibility to patients that potentially can improve treatment outcomes. However, given the unphysiological profile of LAGH preparations, long-term surveillance of efficacy and safety are needed. This review summarizes recent developments of LAGH preparations, and highlights the importance of long-term surveillance registries to assess for efficacy and safety that will be essential for understanding the impact of prolonged exposure to these compounds.

Safety and convenience of once-weekly somapacitan in adult GH deficiency: a 26-week randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Somapacitan is a reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative, developed for once-weekly administration. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of once-weekly somapacitan vs once-daily Norditropin^®. Local tolerability and treatment satisfaction were also assessed.

DESIGN

26-week randomized, controlled phase 3 safety and tolerability trial in six countries (Nbib2382939).

METHODS

Male or female patients aged 18-79 years with adult GH deficiency (AGHD), treated with once-daily GH for ≥6 months, were randomized to once-weekly somapacitan (n = 61) or once-daily Norditropin (n = 31) administered subcutaneously by pen. Both treatments were dose titrated for 8 weeks to achieve insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) standard deviation score (SDS) levels within the normal range, and then administered at a fixed dose. Outcome measures were adverse events (AEs), including injection site reactions; occurrence of anti-somapacitan/anti-GH antibodies and change in treatment satisfaction, assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9).

RESULTS

Mean IGF-I SDS remained between 0 and 2 SDS throughout the trial in both groups. AEs were mostly mild or moderate and transient in nature. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis, headache and fatigue in both groups. More than 1500 somapacitan injections were administered and no clinically significant injection site reactions were reported. No anti-somapacitan or anti-GH antibodies were detected. The TSQM-9 score for convenience increased significantly more with somapacitan vs Norditropin (P = 0.0171).

CONCLUSIONS

In this 26-week trial in patients with AGHD, somapacitan was well tolerated and no safety issues were identified. Once-weekly somapacitan was reported to be more convenient than once-daily Norditropin.

Growth Hormone Research Society perspective on biomarkers of GH action in children and adults

OBJECTIVE

The Growth Hormone Research Society (GRS) convened a Workshop in 2017 to evaluate clinical endpoints, surrogate endpoints and biomarkers during GH treatment of children and adults and in patients with acromegaly.

PARTICIPANTS

GRS invited 34 international experts including clinicians, basic scientists, a regulatory scientist and physicians from the pharmaceutical industry.

EVIDENCE

Current literature was reviewed and expert opinion was utilized to establish the state of the art and identify current gaps and unmet needs.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Following plenary presentations, breakout groups discussed questions framed by the planning committee. The attendees re-convened after each breakout session to share the group reports. A writing team compiled the breakout session reports into a document that was subsequently discussed and revised by participants. This was edited further and circulated for final review after the meeting. Participants from pharmaceutical companies were not part of the writing process.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical endpoint in paediatric GH treatment is adult height with height velocity as a surrogate endpoint. Increased life expectancy is the ideal but unfeasible clinical endpoint of GH treatment in adult GH-deficient patients (GHDA) and in patients with acromegaly. The pragmatic clinical endpoints in GHDA include normalization of body composition and quality of life, whereas symptom relief and reversal of comorbidities are used in acromegaly. Serum IGF-I is widely used as a biomarker, even though it correlates weakly with clinical endpoints in GH treatment, whereas in acromegaly, normalization of IGF-I may be related to improvement in mortality. There is an unmet need for novel biomarkers that capture the pleiotropic actions of GH in relation to GH treatment and in patients with acromegaly.

Challenges and future for the delivery of growth hormone therapy

Growth hormone (GH) has multiple roles in sustaining human development and homeostasis. Its pulsatile secretion stimulates growth and contributes to an equilibrium in a process tightly regulated and coordinated by many organs. GH deficiency is a medical condition affecting all ages, with not only significant consequences in the health of the patient but also impact on the quality of life. This review gathers the different strategies used today with a glance at future technologies to treat GH deficiency. We present key aspects for consideration when developing new methods to deliver GH, mimicking or replacing its pulsatile activity. Today and in the future, the fusion of biochemistry, biology and nanotechnology will provide hybrid devices using microfluidic systems. But, until new technologies for GH delivery will become available, current methods must be reinforced in conjunction with the development of better communication strategies between the health system and patients. Treating GH deficiency represents a multidisciplinary effort for which this review provides a glance at potential future directions for this therapy.