Risk factors for the development or progression of diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy: Meta‐analysis and systematic review

Determinants of progression of diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy

AIMS

To assess the rate of diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression in an Australian cohort and to identify the determinants of DR progression in pregnancy.

METHODS

A total of 367 pregnancies of women with Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus attending King Edward Memorial Hospital, Western Australia, between June 2020 and July 2023 were included. These women were screened for the presence and severity of DR in the first trimester and/or at 28-32 weeks gestation via retinal imaging with a DRS camera.

RESULTS

DR was seen in 121 (33 %) pregnancies at baseline and DR progression was seen in 62 (17 %) pregnancies. Only 11 (4 %) women with no baseline DR developed DR and none of these progressed to more than moderate non-proliferative DR. A total of 51 (42 %) women with baseline DR had DR progression. The presence of baseline DR was the only significant predictor for DR progression on multivariate analysis (OR 9.88 (4.43-22.07), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women without DR at baseline are unlikely to progress to more severe forms of DR and usually do not require treatment. The presence of DR at baseline screening during pregnancy is a strong predictor of DR progression during pregnancy.

Update on diabetic retinopathy during pregnancy

Diabetes mellitus (DM) leads to several vascular and neurological complications, including diabetic retinopathy (DR). As the population ages, health problems in certain groups, including children and pregnant women, are drawing more and more attention. Pregnancy is one of the independent risk factors for the development and progression of DR. Pregnancy-induced changes may contribute to or worsen DR, which can cause a tremendous burden on public health. It is essential for pregnant women with DR and their offspring to minimize the risk of vision loss from DR in this population and adverse outcomes by understanding the development and processes behind this process. Thus, we have updated the recent situation of epidemiology, evolution characteristics, risk factors, pathophysiology, pregnancy outcomes for a better understanding of the latest status of DR, helping to improve maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes, and promoting health for women with DR.

The risk of development and progression of diabetic retinopathy in a group of ethnically diverse pregnant women with diabetes attending three regional Diabetic Eye Screening Programs in the UK

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Currently, all pregnant women with diabetes are asked to attend screening at least twice during pregnancy, even if no retinopathy is detected in early pregnancy. We hypothesise that for women with no diabetic retinopathy in early pregnancy, the frequency of retinal screening may be safely reduced.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data for 4718 pregnant women attending one of three UK Diabetic Eye Screening (DES) Programmes between July 2011 and October 2019 was extracted. The women's UK DES grades at 13 weeks gestation (early pregnancy) and 28 weeks gestation (late pregnancy) were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to report baseline data. Ordered logistic regression was used to control for covariates, such as age, ethnicity, diabetes duration, and diabetes type.

RESULTS

Of the women with grades recorded for both early and late pregnancy, a total of 3085 (65.39%) women had no retinopathy in early pregnancy, and 2306 (74.7%) of these women did not develop any retinopathy by 28 weeks. The number of women without retinopathy in early pregnancy who developed referable retinopathy was 14 (0.45%), none of whom required treatment. Diabetic Retinopathy in early pregnancy remained a significant predictor of DES grade in late pregnancy when covariates of Age, Ethnicity, and Diabetes Type were controlled for (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, this study has demonstrated that the burden of managing diabetes for pregnant mothers may be safely reduced by limiting the number of diabetic eye screening appointments in women who have no retinal changes in early pregnancy. Screening of women with retinopathy in early pregnancy should continue in line with current UK guidance.

15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

GLP-1 receptor agonists and diabetic retinopathy: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent research suggests that GLP-1 RAs may influence diabetic retinopathy (DR). We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for trials comparing FDA-approved GLP-1 RAs to placebo, insulin, or oral antidiabetic medicine. Rates of DR, ocular adverse events, demographics, and clinical characteristics were compared amongst cohorts on 93 trials. GLP-1 RA use was significantly associated with increased risk of early-stage DR (risk ratio (RR) = 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.01, 1.68]) and early-stage retinal adverse events (RR = 1.29, 95% CI [1.01, 1.66]) compared to placebo. Compared to insulin, GLP-1 RA use protected against late-stage DR (RR = 0.38, 95% CI [0.15, 0.98]). Analysis of individual GLP-1 RAs showed that albiglutide is responsible for these trends, as it is significantly associated with a higher risk of early-stage DR (RR = 2.18, 95% CI [1.01, 4.67]) compared to placebo and a lower risk of late-stage DR (RR = 0.25, 95% CI [0.09, 0.70]) compared to insulin. Albiglutide similarly affected retinal and ocular adverse events. Demographic analysis revealed significant differences between GLP-1 RA and comparator groups for age, HbA1c, body weight, BMI, duration of diabetes, sex, race, and ethnicity. The influence of GLP-1 RAs on DR and the eye may depend on the specific GLP-1 RA and patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

The Impact of Pregnancy on Diabetic Retinopathy: A Single-Site Study of Clinical Risk Factors

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to provide information on modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for the progression and development of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). This retrospective chart review case-control study was designed to provide perspective on clinical variables.

METHODS

Single-center study analysis was completed with chart review, identifying 50 patients (100 eyes) ultimately included in the final analysis. Included patients were women with type 1 or 2 diabetes that entered prenatal care and had a delivery from January 2010 to December 2022. The primary outcome measure was clinical variables between progression and no progression groups. Data were analyzed via χ2 analysis and independent samples t test when appropriate. Significantly different variables were further analyzed by binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

The DR progression group had significantly higher prepregnancy HbA1c levels (9.9) when compared to the no progression group (8.5, p value 0.028). DR progression group also had higher rates (51.9%) of full-term births. The DME progression group had significantly higher rates of type 2 diabetics (100%) compared to the no progression group (30.9%, p value 0.029). Hypertension treatment before (81.8%; p value 0.008) pregnancy was also more common in the DME progression group. Intravitreal injections were more common in patients with visual acuity deterioration (26.7%, p value 0.046). The average number of fetal complications was significantly higher in the visual acuity non-worsening group (1.1) compared to the progression group (0.5, p value 0.04). These variables were not statistically significant after entry into multivariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

Severity and treatment of retinopathy before pregnancy, type of diabetes, and blood pressure control are all significant factors affecting the progression and development of severe ocular complications in pregnancy.