A de novo loss-of-function DYNC1H1 mutation in a patient with parkinsonian features and a favourable response to levodopa

DYNC1H1-related epilepsy: Genotype-phenotype correlation

AIM

To explore the phenotypic spectrum and refine the genotype-phenotype correlation of DYNC1H1-related epilepsy.

METHOD

The clinical data of 15 patients with epilepsy in our cohort and 50 patients with epilepsy from 24 published studies with the DYNC1H1 variants were evaluated.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 13 variants were identified from 15 patients (seven males, eight females). Twelve variants were de novo and seven were new. Age at seizure onset ranged from 3 months to 4 years 5 months (median age 1 year). Common seizure types were epileptic spasms, focal seizures, tonic seizures, and myoclonic seizures. Mild-to-severe developmental delay was present in all patients. Six patients were diagnosed with West syndrome and one was diagnosed with epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep (CSWS). Collectively, in our cohort and published studies, 17% had ophthalmic diseases, 31% of variants were located in the stalk domain, and 92% patients with epilepsy had a malformation of cortical development (MCD).

INTERPRETATION

The phenotypes of DYNC1H1-related epilepsy included multiple seizure types; the most common epileptic syndrome was West syndrome. CSWS is a new phenotype of DYNC1H1-related epilepsy. One-third of the variants in patients with epilepsy were located in the stalk domain. Most patients had a MCD and developmental delay.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Nearly 40% of patients with DYNC1H1 variants had epilepsy. Ninety-two percent of patients with DYNC1H1-related epilepsy had malformation of cortical development. More than 10% of patients with DYNC1H1-related epilepsy were diagnosed with West syndrome. Continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep could be a new phenotype of DYNC1H1 variants. One-third of the variants in patients with epilepsy were located in the stalk domain.

Promoter Hypomethylation of TGFBR3 as a Risk Factor of Alzheimer’s Disease: An Integrated Epigenomic-Transcriptomic Analysis

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the abnormal deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles in the brain and accompanied with cognitive impairment. However, the fundamental cause of this disease remains elusive. To elucidate the molecular processes related to AD, we carried out an integrated analysis utilizing gene expression microarrays (GSE36980 and GSE5281) and DNA methylation microarray (GSE66351) in temporal cortex of AD patients from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. We totally discovered 409 aberrantly methylated and differentially expressed genes. These dysregulated genes were significantly enriched in biological processes including cell part morphogenesis, chemical synaptic transmission and regulation of Aβ formation. Through convergent functional genomic (CFG) analysis, expression cross-validation and clinicopathological correlation analysis, higher TGFBR3 level was observed in AD and positively correlated with Aβ accumulation. Meanwhile, the promoter methylation level of TGFBR3 was reduced in AD and negatively associated with Aβ level and advanced Braak stage. Mechanically, TGFBR3 might promote Aβ production by enhancing β- and γ-secretase activities. Further investigation revealed that TGFBR3 may exert its functions via Synaptic vesicle cycle, Calcium signaling pathway and MAPK signal pathway by regulating hub genes GNB1, GNG3, CDC5L, DYNC1H1 and FBXW7. Overall, our findings highlighted TGFBR3 as an AD risk gene and might be used as a diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target for AD treatment.

Two cases of DYNC1H1 mutations with intractable epilepsy

BACKGROUND

The DYNC1H1 gene encodes the heavy chain of cytoplasmic dynein 1, a core structure of the cytoplasmic dynein complex. Dominant DYNC1H1 mutations are implicated in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, type 20, spinal muscular atrophy, lower extremity-predominant 1, and autosomal dominant mental retardation 13 with neuronal migration defects. We report two patients with DYNC1H1 mutations who had intractable epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID), one with and one without pachygyria.

CASE REPORTS

Patient 1 had severe ID. At the age of 2 months, she presented myoclonic seizures and tonic seizures, and later experienced atonic seizures and focal impaired-awareness seizures (FIAS). EEG showed slow waves in right central areas during myoclonic seizures. Brain MRI revealed pachygyria, predominantly in the occipital lobe. After callosal transection her atonic seizures disappeared, but FIAS remained. Patient 2 was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and severe ID. At the age of 7 years, he presented generalized tonic-clonic seizures, myoclonic seizures, and FIAS. Interictal EEG showed generalized spike-and-wave complexes, predominantly in the left frontal area. Brain MRI was unremarkable. Exome sequencing revealed novel de novo mutations in DYNC1H1: c.4691A > T, p.(Glu1564Val) in Patient 1 and c.12536 T > C, p.(Leu4179Ser) in Patient 2.

CONCLUSIONS

DYNC1H1 comprises a stem, stalk, and six AAA domains. Patient 2 is the second report of an AAA6 domain mutation without malformations of cortical development. The p.(Gly4072Ser) mutation in the AAA6 domain was also reported in a patient with ASD. It may be that the AAA6 domain has little effect on neuronal movement of DYNC1H1 along microtubules.