1
|
Onnekink AM, Klatte DCF, van Hooft JE, van den Berg SH, van der Zwaan SMS, van Doorn R, Hinnen SCH, Potjer TP, Bleiker EMA, van Leerdam ME. Attitudes toward genetic testing, family planning and preimplantation genetic testing in families with a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant. Fam Cancer 2024:10.1007/s10689-024-00401-3. [PMID: 38822936 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00401-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Individuals with a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant (PV) have a highly increased life time risk of melanoma and pancreatic cancer. This cross-sectional study assessed the attitudes among toward genetic testing, family planning, and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in confirmed CDKN2A PV carriers and individuals with a 50% risk of the PV (at-risk carriers) using of a one-time questionnaire.A total of 537 individuals were screened for eligibility, of whom 208 of 366 (57%) confirmed carriers (56% female, median age 54 years [IQR 46-63]) and 39 of 171 (23%) at-risk carriers (59% female, median age of 26 years [IQR 22-32]) participated in the study. Primary motivations for genetic testing were to gain control over their personal and children's cancer risk, as well as increasing cancer surveillance practices. In contrast, concerns about obtaining a mortgage and life insurance were frequently cited as reasons for postponing genetic testing. Family planning decisions remained largely unaffected in both confirmed and at-risk carriers; however, the majority of confirmed carriers were still unaware of their familial or personal cancer risk when starting a family. More than 60% of the participants were unfamiliar with PGT and only a minority (19% of confirmed carriers and 10% of at-risk carriers) would be open to considering PGT as a reproductive option. This study found different attitudes toward genetic testing, family planning, and PGT among individuals affected by the CDKN2A PV. Understanding these different attitudes can help clinicians to address the complexities surrounding these issues, especially for younger individuals facing difficult decisions about the timing of genetic testing, family planning, and the potential use of assisted reproductive options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Onnekink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands.
| | - D C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - J E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - S H van den Berg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - S M S van der Zwaan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - R van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - S C H Hinnen
- Department of Psycho-Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - T P Potjer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coulombe F, Laberge AM. The Need to Consider Context: A Systematic Review of Factors Involved in the Consent Process for Genetic Tests from the Perspective of Patients. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2024; 15:93-107. [PMID: 38189769 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2297935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Background: Informed consent for genetic tests is a well-established practice. It should be based on good quality information and in keeping with the patient's values. Existing informed consent assessment tools assess knowledge and values. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on what specific elements need to be discussed or considered in the consent process for genetic tests.Methods: We performed a systematic review to identify all factors involved in the decision-making and consent process about genetic testing, from the perspective of patients. Through public databases, we identified studies reporting factors that influence the decision to accept or decline genetic testing. Studies were included if they reported the perspective of patients or at-risk individuals. All articles were thematically coded.Results: 1989 articles were reviewed: 70 met inclusion criteria and 12 additional articles were identified through the references of included studies. Coding of the 82 articles led to the identification of 45 factors involved in decision-making and consent, which were initially divided into three domains: in favor of, against or with an undetermined influence on genetic testing. Each factor was also divided into three subdomains relating to the informed choice concept: knowledge, values or other. The factors in the "other" subdomain were all related to the context of testing (e.g. timing, cost, influence of family members, etc), and were present in all three domains.Conclusions: We describe the network of factors contributing to decision-making and consent process and identify the context of genetic testing as a third component to influence this process. Future studies should consider the evaluation of contextual factors as an important and relevant component of the consent and decision-making process about genetic tests. Based on these results, we plan to develop and test a more comprehensive tool to assess informed consent for genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Coulombe
- Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Center and McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Bioethics Program, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Albujja MH, Al-Ghedan M, Dakshnamoorthy L, Pla Victori J. Preimplantation genetic testing for embryos predisposed to hereditary cancer: Possibilities and challenges. CANCER PATHOGENESIS AND THERAPY 2024; 2:1-14. [PMID: 38328708 PMCID: PMC10846329 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpt.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), which was developed as an alternative to prenatal genetic testing, allows couples to avoid pregnancies with abnormal chromosomes and the subsequent termination of the affected fetus. Originally used for early onset monogenic conditions, PGT is now used to prevent various types of inherited cancer conditions based on the development of PGT technology, assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs), and in vitro fertilization (IVF). This review provides insights into the potential benefits and challenges associated with the application of PGT for hereditary cancer and provides an overview of the existing literature on this test, with a particular focus on the current challenges related to laws, ethics, counseling, and technology. Additionally, this review predicts the future potential applications of this method. Although PGT may be utilized to predict and prevent hereditary cancer, each case should be comprehensively evaluated. The motives of couples must be assessed to prevent the misuse of this technique for eugenic purposes, and non-pathogenic phenotypes must be carefully evaluated. Pathological cases that require this technology should also be carefully considered based on legal and ethical reasoning. PGT may be the preferred treatment for hereditary cancer cases; however, such cases require careful case-by-case evaluations. Therefore, this study concludes that multidisciplinary counseling and support for patients and their families are essential to ensure that PGT is a viable option that meets all legal and ethical concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed H. Albujja
- Department of Forensic Sciences, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences, Riyadh 11452, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maher Al-Ghedan
- Genetics Laboratory, Thuriah Medical Center, Riyadh 11523, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Josep Pla Victori
- Department of Genetic Counselling, VI-RMA Global, Valencia 46004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cutica I, Mortarino M, Garagiola I, Pravettoni G, Peyvandi F. Psychological and cognitive factors involved in decision-making process of haemophilia carriers in reproductive choices. Haemophilia 2023; 29:1313-1319. [PMID: 37548114 DOI: 10.1111/hae.14836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Haemophilia carriers (HCs) face a multitude of psychological challenges, mainly linked to the possibility of having an affected child. Important reproductive decisions such as opting for pre-implantation genetic testing, or choosing prenatal diagnosis and then whether to continue or interrupt pregnancy in case of affected male fetus, have to be taken into consideration. Notwithstanding, the role of psychological characteristics on such decision-making process needs further investigation. AIM The aim of this study was to investigate whether HCs' beliefs and emotions about haemophilia and cognitive factors such as decision-making style, risk perception, coping strategies in response to stress, and need for cognitive closure might modulate HCs' reproductive decisions. METHODS Participants were interviewed about their beliefs and emotions on haemophilia and filled an on-line standardized questionnaire on cognitive variables. Sixty HCs participated in this study. RESULTS Results show that HCs with high distress for haemophilia given by negative childhood experiences for one or more family member illness and by high concern for their children's health, and with psychological traits characterized by logical (versus emotional) reasoning, active coping style and high need for certainty, tend to choose diagnostic prenatal tests over routine pregnancy analysis. CONCLUSION This study highlighted the influence of negative early-life experience with haemophilia and of several cognitive factors in HCs choice of prenatal test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Cutica
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mimosa Mortarino
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, and Fondazione Luigi Villa, Milan, Italy
| | - Isabella Garagiola
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, and Fondazione Luigi Villa, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Flora Peyvandi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, and Fondazione Luigi Villa, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaye DK. Addressing ethical issues related to prenatal diagnostic procedures. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol 2023; 9:1. [PMID: 36737803 PMCID: PMC9896777 DOI: 10.1186/s40748-023-00146-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For women of advanced maternal age or couples with high risk of genetic mutations, the ability to screen for embryos free of certain genetic mutations is reassuring, as it provides opportunity to address age-related decline in fertility through preimplantation genetic testing. This procedure has potential to facilitate better embryo selection, improve implantation rates with single embryo transfer and reduce miscarriage rates, among others, yet confers some risk to the embryo and additional costs of assisted reproductive technology. This raises questions whether, when and which patients should receive routine PGT-A prior to embryo transfer. DISCUSSION Prenatal diagnostic procedures refer to tests done when one or both genetic parents has a known genetic disorder (or has worries about the disorder) and testing is performed on them, their gametes or on the embryos to determine if the latter is likely to carry a genetic disorder. PGT is used to identify genetic defects in gametes or embryos (often created through in vitro fertilization (IVF). The procedures generate immense potential to improve health and wellbeing by preventing conception or birth of babies with undesirable traits, life-limiting conditions and even lethal conditions. However, they generate a lot of information, which often may challenge decision-making ability of healthcare providers and parents, and raise ethical challenges. CONCLUSION Prenatal diagnostic procedures have potential to address uncertainty and risk of having a child affected with a genetic disease. They, however, often raise own uncertainty and controversies, whose origin, manifestation and related ethical issues are presented. There is need to develop individual and couple decision support tools that incorporate patients' values and concerns in the decision-making process in order to promote more informed decisions, during counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Kabonge Kaye
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda ,grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Forgarty African Bioethics Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and the School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Severijns Y, Heijmans MWF, de Die-Smulders CEM, Bijlsma EK, Corsten-Janssen N, Joosten SJR, van Kuijk SMJ, Lichtenbelt KD, Ottenheim CPE, Stuurman KE, Tan-Sindhunata GMB, de Vries H, van Osch LADM. The effects of an online decision aid to support the reproductive decision-making process of genetically at risk couples-A pilot study. J Genet Couns 2023; 32:153-165. [PMID: 36056622 PMCID: PMC10087273 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Couples at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring may experience doubts about their reproductive options. This study examines the effects of an online decision aid (DA) on the (joint) reproductive decision-making process of couples (not pregnant at time of inclusion) at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring. The primary outcome is decisional conflict, and secondary outcomes are knowledge, realistic expectations, deliberation, joint informed decision-making, and decisional self-efficacy. These outcomes were measured with a pretest-posttest design: before use (T0), after use (T1), and 2 weeks after use (T2) of the decision aid (DA). Usability of the DA was assessed at T1. Paired sample t-tests were used to compute differences between baseline and subsequent measurements. The comparisons of T0-T1 and T0-T2 indicate a significant reduction in mean decisional conflict scores with stronger effects for participants with high baseline decisional conflict scores. Furthermore, use of the DA led to increased knowledge, improved realistic expectations, and increased levels of deliberation, with higher increase in participants with low baseline scores. Decision self-efficacy only improved for participants with lower baseline scores. Participants indicated that the information in the DA was comprehensible and clearly organized. These first results indicate that this online DA is an appropriate tool to support couples at risk of transmitting a genetic disease and a desire to have (a) child(ren) in their reproductive decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yil Severijns
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje W F Heijmans
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christine E M de Die-Smulders
- GROW School for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Emilia K Bijlsma
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Corsten-Janssen
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Department of Genetics, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sara J R Joosten
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Radboudumc Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Klaske D Lichtenbelt
- Department of Genetics, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Kyra E Stuurman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hein de Vries
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth A D M van Osch
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gregersen PA, Funding M, Alsner J, Olsen MH, Overgaard J, Urbak SF, Staffieri SE, Lou S. Danish heritable retinoblastoma survivors' perspectives on reproductive choices: "It's important for me, not to pass on this condition". J Genet Couns 2023; 32:31-42. [PMID: 35876835 PMCID: PMC10087262 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Despite reporting an overall normal life, survivors of heritable retinoblastoma face numerous physical and psychosocial issues. In particular, reproductive decision-making is often complex and difficult. This study aims to examine survivors' reflections on passing on heritable retinoblastoma to their children, how survivors approach their reproductive choices, and how the healthcare system can optimize counseling and support. Semi-structured interviews with Danish adult survivors of heritable retinoblastoma were qualitatively analyzed to explore their experiences. Participants were recruited from the Retinoblastoma Survivorship Clinic, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Thematic data analysis was conducted followed by a condensing process specifically for the subthemes relating to reproductive choices. A common subtheme for all participants was a strong wish to avoid passing on retinoblastoma to their children. The participants emphasized the various medical, practical, emotional, and moral issues impacting their final reproductive choice in the process of family planning to conceive a child unaffected by retinoblastoma. Some had no option other than to conceive naturally and hope for an unaffected baby; while others weighed the pros and cons of choosing natural conception with prenatal testing and then considering termination of pregnancy (in case of an affected fetus) versus choosing fertility treatment with preimplantation genetic testing to achieve an unaffected pregnancy. Several participants underlined the complexity of their decisions, and also expressed feelings of guilt, both toward their affected child, and guilt for putting their partner through many difficult decisions and obstacles due to their genetic condition. Our findings demonstrate how one family-planning decision is not unequivocally "better" or easier than another. Healthcare professionals must provide the necessary information and tools to support the individual's unique decision-making process. Survivors' autonomy and individual needs, as well as the numerous and diverse aspects of heritable retinoblastoma, should be carefully considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille A Gregersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Centre for Rare Diseases, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Funding
- Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jan Alsner
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maja H Olsen
- Survivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Steen F Urbak
- Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sandra E Staffieri
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.,Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stina Lou
- Defactum - Public Health & Health Services Research, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.,Centre for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah IH, Salo-Mullen EE, Amoroso KA, Kelsen D, Stadler ZK, Hamilton JG. Attitudes toward preimplantation genetic testing and quality of life among individuals with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:31. [PMID: 36056367 PMCID: PMC9440538 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00239-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC) syndrome is an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer predisposition associated with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the CDH1 gene. Identifying early stage HDGC is difficult, and prophylactic measures can be effective in preventing incidence. Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) can provide information about CDH1 variant status, HDGC risk, and limit familial transmission of CDH1 variants. To date, however, little is known about the attitudes of individuals with CDH1 variants towards PGT. METHODS Given that little is known about the reproductive attitudes of individuals with HDGC, we recruited participants with CDH1 variants from a familial gastric cancer registry and administered a cross-sectional survey with open- and closed-ended response items. We assessed attitudes regarding PGT and the effect of HDGC on quality of life. RESULTS Participants (n = 21) were predominantly partnered (61.9%), had a personal cancer history (71.4%), and had biological children (71.4%). Interest in learning about PGT was high; 66.7% of participants were interested in PGT and 90.5% approved of healthcare providers discussing PGT with individuals with CDH1 variants. Attitudes regarding personal use were varied. Among all participants, 35% would not, 25% were uncertain, and 40% would use PGT. Personal philosophy and preferences for family and reproduction were key factors related to PGT attitudes. HDGC had moderate effects on participants' quality of life, including social relationships, health behaviors, and emotional experiences including worry about cancer risk and guilt regarding familial implications. CONCLUSION PGT was identified by participants as acceptable for use in a variety of contexts and benefits of reproductive counseling involving PGT may extend beyond CDH1 carriers to family members' reproductive behaviors. Dispositions towards PGT are governed by personal philosophy or belief systems. These findings can help guide providers counseling individuals with CDH1 variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim H Shah
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin E Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly A Amoroso
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Kelsen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jada G Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Freeman L, Righetti S, Delatycki MB, Scully JL, Kirk EP. The views of people with a lived experience of deafness and the general public regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting: A systematic review. Genet Med 2022; 24:1803-1813. [PMID: 35659827 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genes associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss are commonly included in reproductive carrier screening panels, which are now routinely offered in preconception and prenatal care in many countries. However, there is debate whether hearing loss should be considered a medical condition appropriate for screening. This systematic review assessed research on opinions of those with a lived experience of deafness and the general public regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting. METHODS Search of 5 online databases yielded 423 articles, 20 of which met inclusion criteria. We assessed the quality of each study, extracted data, and performed thematic analysis on qualitative studies. RESULTS Most studies indicated interest in the use of prenatal diagnosis for deafness. However, there were mixed views, and sometimes strongly held views, expressed regarding the reproductive options that should be available to those with an increased chance of having a child with deafness. Studies were small, from a limited number of countries, and most were too old to include views regarding preimplantation genetic testing. CONCLUSION There is a broad range of views regarding the use of reproductive options for deafness. Further research is essential to explore the benefits and harms of including nonsyndromic hearing loss genes in carrier screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda Freeman
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Medicine, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Righetti
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Medicine, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Edwin P Kirk
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Medicine, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cheng L, Meiser B, Kirk E, Kennedy D, Barlow-Stewart K, Kaur R. Factors influencing patients' decision-making about preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:2599-2610. [PMID: 36006036 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the roles of individual and interpersonal factors in couples' decision-making regarding preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M)? SUMMARY ANSWER Couples' decision-making regarding PGT-M was associated with individual and interpersonal factors, that is the perceived consistency of information received, satisfaction with information, self-efficacy (individuals' beliefs in their ability to make decisions), actual knowledge about PGT-M and social support from the partner. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Various factors have been shown to be associated with decision-making regarding PGT-M. However, PGT-M is experienced at an individual level, and to date, no studies have investigated the roles of the above-mentioned individual and interpersonal factors. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a cross-sectional study with 279 participants. Participants were recruited through IVFAustralia, Sydney Children's Hospital and support groups from May 2020 to November 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Participants were women who had undergone or were considering PGT-M and their partners. Participants were recruited through IVFAustralia, Sydney Children's Hospital and support groups to complete online questionnaires. Decisional regret, decisional satisfaction and decisional conflict were measured as outcome variables. Multiple linear regressions were performed to examine the association between factors and outcome variables. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to test the differences between participants who had undergone PGT-M and those who were considering PGT-M. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE For couples who had undergone PGT-M, decisional regret was significantly negatively associated with perceived consistency of information received (β = -0.26, P < 0.01), self-efficacy (β = -0.25, P < 0.01) and actual knowledge about PGT-M (β = -0.30, P < 0.001), while decisional satisfaction had positive association with satisfaction with information received (β = 0.37, P < 0.001) and self-efficacy (β = 0.24, P < 0.05). For couples who were considering PGT-M, decisional conflict was negatively associated with satisfaction with information received (β = -0.56, P < 0.001). For females who had undergone PGT-M, decisional regret was negatively associated with social support from the partner (β = -0.35, P < 0.05) in addition to perceived consistency of information received (β = -0.24, P < 0.05). In this group, decisional satisfaction was positively associated with women's satisfaction with the information received (β = 0.34, P < 0.01), social support from the partner (β = 0.26, P < 0.05) and self-efficacy (β = 0.25, P < 0.05). For females who were considering PGT-M, decisional conflict was negatively associated with satisfaction with the information received (β = -0.43, P < 0.01) and social support from the partner (β = -0.30, P < 0.05). This study also identified those aspects of PGT-M that couples felt most concerned about in relation to their decision-making, in particular safety issues such as short- or long-term health problems for the baby and potential harms to the embryos and the mother's health. The likelihood of getting pregnant and having a baby with a genetic condition being tested for were also important in couples' decision-making. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study assessed the concerns of couples about having a baby with a variety of genetic conditions. However, condition-specific issues might not be covered. Furthermore, social support from the partner was assessed among females only. Male participants' perceived social support from their partner and the association between mutual support and decision-making were not assessed due to the absence of dyadic data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Results highlight the importance of effective patient education on PGT-M and the need to provide high-quality and consistent information in the context of patient-centred care. Patients are likely to benefit from information that addresses their specific concerns in relation to PGT-M. From females' perspective, support from partners is essential, and partners should, therefore, be encouraged to participate in all stages of the decision-making process. Suggestions for future studies were made. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) B.M. was funded through a Senior Research Fellowship Level B (ID 1078523) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. L.C. was supported by a University International Postgraduate Award under the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. No other funding was received for this study. The authors report no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Cheng
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Edwin Kirk
- Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Debra Kennedy
- Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,IVFAustralia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kristine Barlow-Stewart
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Administration, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Siermann M, Tšuiko O, Vermeesch JR, Raivio T, Borry P. A review of normative documents on preimplantation genetic testing: Recommendations for PGT-P. Genet Med 2022; 24:1165-1175. [PMID: 35341652 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Recently, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for polygenic conditions (PGT-P) has been introduced commercially. In view of the lack of specific guidance on this development, we analyzed normative documents on PGT for monogenic conditions (PGT-M) to understand what we can learn from these documents for recommendations for PGT-P. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of normative guidelines and recommendations on PGT-M. The aim was to understand what the current consensus and disagreements are on ethical acceptability of PGT-M and how this compares with PGT-P. RESULTS We analyzed 38 documents by advisory committees at the national, European, and global level. In total, 2 themes were identified, which included the following: (1) what PGT is considered appropriate for and (2) who can make decisions regarding the use of PGT. Many aspects of PGT-M documents apply to PGT-P as well. Additional factors such as the fact that PGT-P screens for risk indications of multiple polygenic conditions increase ethical difficulties regarding severity, risk, autonomy, and informed decision-making. CONCLUSION On the basis of PGT-M normative documents, we conclude that ethical acceptability for PGT-P is limited. Our findings present various factors that have to be considered for the development of guidelines and the appropriateness of PGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Siermann
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Reproductive Genetics Unit, Center of Human Genetics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Taneli Raivio
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Decision-making and experiences of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in inherited heart diseases: a qualitative study. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:187-193. [PMID: 34545210 PMCID: PMC8821668 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00963-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) ensures a disease-causing variant is not passed to the next generation, including for inherited heart diseases. PGD is known to cause significant emotional burden, but little is known about how parents experience PGD to select against inherited heart disease. We aim to understand how people with inherited heart disease, and their partners, experience and make decisions about PGD. Participants were recruited from a specialised inherited heart disease clinic. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with adult participants who had considered PGD. A semi-structured interview schedule explored overall experiences and reasons for undergoing PGD. Broad topics included experience of disease, reproductive history, psychosocial and financial considerations. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using a framework method. Twenty participants were included (15 with inherited cardiomyopathy, 3 with inherited arrhythmia syndrome and 2 partners). In contemplating PGD, participants considered 3 main issues: past experience of disease e.g. sudden cardiac death, sport restrictions and clinical heterogeneity; intergenerational responsibilities; and practical considerations such as finances and maternal age. Among those who chose to undergo PGD (n = 7/18), past experience of a significant cardiac event, such as family history of sudden cardiac death, was important in the decision process. The decision to undergo PGD for inherited heart disease is complex and influenced by individual values and experience of disease. We highlight key areas where further discussion may assist in PGD decision processes.
Collapse
|
13
|
Siermann M, Claesen Z, Pasquier L, Raivio T, Tšuiko O, Vermeesch JR, Borry P. A systematic review of the views of healthcare professionals on the scope of preimplantation genetic testing. J Community Genet 2022; 13:1-11. [PMID: 35028914 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00573-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) involves testing embryos created through in vitro fertilization for the presence of hereditary genetic disorders and chromosome abnormalities. PGT for monogenic conditions (PGT-M) is generally performed for childhood-onset, lethal disorders, but is increasingly accepted for certain adult-onset conditions, conditions with available treatment options or conditions with lower penetrance. Furthermore, the development of PGT for polygenic conditions (PGT-P) makes ethical questions regarding PGT indications imperative. A systematic review was therefore performed to gather and analyse studies on the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the appropriate scope of PGT, with the aim of getting insights into the concerns about the scope of PGT now and in the near future. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Twelve qualitative articles were included. The main themes extracted were the scope of PGT and decision-making about PGT. Defining 'a serious genetic condition' was seen as complex, but severity, high penetrance and absence of treatability and patients' experience were seen as relevant indications to determine the appropriateness of PGT. In navigating the decision-making processes with patients, professionals experienced friction between setting limits and respecting patients' autonomy. Such friction and ethical dilemmas around seriousness, informed decision-making and preventative medicine show that while expanding the list of possible PGT indications and the development of PGT-P could augment patients' reproductive autonomy, it could also lead to an increased reproductive 'burden' for patients. These insights are crucial for establishing guidelines that help healthcare professionals navigate ethical tensions associated with PGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Siermann
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Zoë Claesen
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laurent Pasquier
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Taneli Raivio
- Department of Physiology, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Forbes Shepherd R, Werner-Lin A, Keogh LA, Delatycki MB, Forrest LE. Reproduction and Genetic Responsibility: An Interpretive Description of Reproductive Decision-Making for Young People With Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2022; 32:168-181. [PMID: 34781775 DOI: 10.1177/10497323211046240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The reproductive decision-making of young people (aged 15-39 years) with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), an early onset inherited cancer syndrome, has not been studied in depth. Using interpretive description methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 young Australians (mean age 25.5 years) diagnosed with LFS or at 50% genetic risk. With reflexive thematic analysis, we show how young people's reproductive decision-making and ideals for family formation were shaped by a sense of genetic responsibility to ensure the health of future biological kin. Reproductive technology provided choices for family formation in the context of LFS and also complicated reproductive decisions, as these choices were difficult to understand, make, or carry out. We uphold that reproductive decision-making when living with LFS is a profoundly moral practice that may pose significant challenges for young people navigating their formative years. We offer genetic counseling practice recommendations to support individuals with LFS when making reproductive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan Forbes Shepherd
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, 3085Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, 2281The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, 34361Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Allison Werner-Lin
- School of Social Policy and Practice, 6572The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Louise A Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, 2281The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, 34361Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, 2281The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Laura E Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, 3085Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, 2281The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liscum M, Garcia ML. You can't keep a bad idea down: Dark history, death, and potential rebirth of eugenics. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2021; 305:902-937. [PMID: 34919789 DOI: 10.1002/ar.24849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
"Be careful what you wish for": This adage guides both how this project came to life, and how the topic covered in this review continues to unfold. What began as talks between two friends on shared interests in military history led to a 4-year discussion about how our science curriculum does little to introduce our students to societal and ethical impacts of the science they are taught. What emerged was a curricular idea centered on how "good intentions" of some were developed and twisted by others to result in disastrous consequences of state-sanctioned eugenics. In this article, we take the reader (as we did our students) through the long and soiled history of eugenic thought, from its genesis to the present. Though our focus is on European and American eugenics, we will show how the interfaces and interactions between science and society have evolved over time but have remained ever constant. Four critical 'case studies' will also be employed here for deep, thoughtful exploration on a particular eugenic issue. The goal of the review, as it is with our course, is not to paint humanity with a single evil brush. Instead, our ambition is to introduce our students/readers to the potential for harm through the misapplication and misappropriation of science and scientific technology, and to provide them with the tools to ask the appropriate questions of their scientists, physicians, and politicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mannie Liscum
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael L Garcia
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Decisional needs of patients considering preimplantation genetic testing: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 44:839-852. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
17
|
Zhang J, Pastore LM, Sarwana M, Klein S, Lobel M, Rubin LR. Ethical and moral perspectives of individuals who considered/used preimplantation (embryo) genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:176-187. [PMID: 34279057 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
This study examined perspectives on the ethical implications of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) among individuals who actually (not hypothetically) used or considered using PGT. Most of the prior patient-centered research on PGT ethics used qualitative designs (9 out of the 11 articles) and focused only on single gene testing. This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online questionnaire; 15 items assessed potential ethical concerns involved in PGT decision-making, including clinical indications for PGT, the greater implications of PGT for society, and unused embryo disposition. N = 207 individuals (mean female/male age 35.7/38.9 years, 21% Hispanic or non-White) who had recently used or considered using PGT for single gene (60%) or for chromosomal testing (40%) completed the questionnaire. Most respondents supported PGT screening for disease conditions with childhood or adult onset that are untreatable (64%-85% across items); most opposed PGT for trait selection (76%-81%). Most respondents agreed that PGT aids in parental decision-making (66%-67%), although some expressed concern over potential unforeseen consequences (25%-30%). Regarding disposition of embryos without known genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored freezing indefinitely (86%) or donating to another family (69%), while for embryos with genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored donating to research (78%) or destroying them (62%). Stratification by religious affiliation revealed several differences, such as less acceptance of PGT for diseases that occur in adulthood and have no treatment options among Protestants (p = .015) and greater willingness to donate surplus embryos to research among participants without a religious affiliation (p < .001). These results are limited by the relatively homogeneous sample of participants (mostly White, married, and predominantly college-educated). In summary, participants who considered/used PGT found PGT acceptable overall for screening for disease conditions; most opposed using PGT for trait selection. Our novel questionnaire provides a structured tool for assessing the ethical perspectives surrounding the use of PGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahui Zhang
- Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony, Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Lisa M Pastore
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Miriam Sarwana
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Klein
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marci Lobel
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Lisa R Rubin
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Comparison of Patients' Ethical Perspectives of Preimplantation Embryo Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) vs. Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M). Reprod Sci 2021; 28:3272-3281. [PMID: 34131887 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00644-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
What are the ethical perspectives of preimplantation genetic testing in patients using/considering PGT-A compared to those using/considering PGT-M? A 17-item questionnaire administered online was used to assess ethical perspectives in US patients who recently used/considered PGT-A (n=80) vs. those who used/considered PGT-M (n=72). Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests were conducted with STATA. Most PGT-A and PGT-M users/considerers supported using PGT to screen for diseases fatal in childhood (86-89%) and those causing lifelong disabilities (76-79%) and opposed using PGT to screen for non-medical physical (80-87%) or intellectual traits (74-86%). Both groups agreed that PGT aids in parental decision-making, although some expressed concern over its potential to lead to unforeseen consequences for society and the PGT offspring. More PGT-M than PGT-A users/considerers opposed implanting genetically abnormal embryos when requested by parents (29% PGT-A vs. 56% PGT-M, p = 0.007). For embryo disposition, more PGT-A users/considerers favored freezing (95% PGTA vs. 82% PGT-M, p = 0.018) or donating genetically normal embryos to research (73% PGT-A vs. 57% PGT-M, p = 0.044), while more PGT-M users/considerers supported donating embryos with known genetic abnormalities to research (56% PGT-A vs. 81% PGT-M, p = 0.001). Regardless of the reason for using PGT, users generally agreed on the acceptable and unacceptable uses for it, as well as the potential societal impact. PGT-M users/considerers expressed more opposition than PGT-A users/considerers to implanting embryos with a genetic alteration when requested by the parents.
Collapse
|
19
|
Hughes T, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Jones BP, Almeida PA, Maclaren K, Norman-Taylor J, Johnson M, Nikolaou D. A review on the motivations, decision-making factors, attitudes and experiences of couples using pre-implantation genetic testing for inherited conditions. Hum Reprod Update 2021; 27:944-966. [PMID: 33969393 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmab013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT), fertile couples undergo IVF with genetic testing of embryos to avoid conceptions with a genetic condition. There is an exponentially increasing uptake with over 600 applications listed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in the UK. The psychological aspects of the decision-making process and the experience of PGT, however, are relatively underevaluated, with the potential to leave patients unsupported in their journeys. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE In this review, we aim to comprehensively report on every aspect of couples' experiences of PGT. We consider what motivates users, the practical and ethical decisions involved and how couples navigate the decision-making process. Additionally, we report on the social and psychological impact on couples who are actively undergoing or have completed the PGT process. SEARCH METHODS A systematic search of English peer-reviewed journals of three computerized databases was undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that examined the motivations, attitudes, decision-making factors and experiences of patients who have been actively engaged in the PGT process were included. No restrictions were placed on study design or date of publication. Studies examining patients using PGT in a hypothetical context or solely using PGT for aneuploidy were excluded. Qualitative data were extracted using thematic analysis. OUTCOMES The main outcomes were patient motivations, deciding factors and attitudes, as well as the patient experience of coming to a decision and going through PGT.Patients were primarily motivated by the desire to have a healthy child and to avoid termination of pregnancy. Those with a sick child or previous experience of termination were more likely to use PGT. Patients also felt compelled to make use of the technology available, either from a moral responsibility to do so or to avoid feelings of guilt if not. The main factors considered when deciding to use PGT were the need for IVF and the acceptability of the technology, the financial cost of the procedure and one's ethical standpoint on the creation and manipulation of embryos. There was a general consensus that PGT should be applied to lethal or severe childhood disease but less agreement on use for adult onset or variable expression conditions. There was an agreement that it should not be used to select for aesthetic traits and a frustration with the views of PGT in society. We report that couples find it difficult to consider all of the benefits and costs of PGT, resulting in ambivalence and prolonged indecision. After deciding on PGT use, we found that patients find the process extremely impractical and psychologically demanding. WIDER IMPLICATIONS This review aimed to summarize the current knowledge on how patients decide to use and experience PGT and to make suggestions to incorporate the findings into clinical practice. We cannot stress enough the importance of holistic evaluation of patients and thorough counselling prior to and during PGT use from a multidisciplinary team that includes geneticists, IVF clinicians, psychologists and also patient support groups. Large prospective studies using a validated psychological tool at various stages of the PGT process would provide an invaluable database for professionals to better aid patients in their decision-making and to improve the patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Hughes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Paula A Almeida
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Katherine Maclaren
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Julian Norman-Taylor
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Nikolaou
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Severijns Y, de Die-Smulders CEM, Gültzow T, de Vries H, van Osch LADM. Hereditary diseases and child wish: exploring motives, considerations, and the (joint) decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples. J Community Genet 2021; 12:325-335. [PMID: 33611773 PMCID: PMC8241960 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00510-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Couples who are at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring may face difficult challenges regarding reproductive decision-making. Deciding if, and how, to purse their child wish can be a demanding process. This study aims to describe the reproductive joint decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples. A qualitative study was conducted with 16 couples (N=31) at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring and who received genetic counseling. Most couples were not aware of all available reproductive options in the Netherlands. A variety of motives was reported with almost all couples expressing a preference towards a reproductive option in which the child is genetically related to both parents. Only a few couples considered other options such as the use of donor gametes, adoption, and foster parenting. All couples indicated that they had multiple conversations to reach a mutually supported reproductive decision. Several carriers reported feelings of guilt and in some couples, the woman appeared to have a greater impact in the decision-making process as she should carry a pregnancy and should undergo medical treatments. This study provides insight in the extensive decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples and the role of both partners in this process. These findings can guide the development of genetic counseling (e.g., increase awareness of available reproductive options) and decision support for these couples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Severijns
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - C E M de Die-Smulders
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - T Gültzow
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - H de Vries
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L A D M van Osch
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ye Z, Hu W, Wu B, Zhang Y, Lei C, Williams I, Shouval DS, Kanegane H, Kim KM, de Ridder L, Shah N, Ling G, Yerushalmi B, Kotlarz D, Snapper S, Horn R, Klein C, Muise AM, Huang Y, Uhlig HH. Predictive Prenatal Diagnosis for Infantile-onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease Because of Interleukin-10 Signalling Defects. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2021; 72:276-281. [PMID: 32925557 PMCID: PMC8191811 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Advances in genetic technologies provide opportunities for patient care and ethical challenges. Clinical care of patients with rare Mendelian disorders is often at the forefront of those developments. Whereas in classical polygenic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the predictive value of genetic variants is very low, predictive prenatal genetic diagnosis can inform families at high risk of severe genetic disorders. Patients with IL-10 signalling defects because of pathogenic variants in IL10RA, Il10RB, and IL10 develop severe infantile onset inflammatory bowel disease that is completely penetrant and has a high morbidity and substantial mortality despite treatment. METHODS We performed a survey among tertiary specialist paediatric centers of 10 countries on the utilization of predictive prenatal genetic diagnosis in IL-10 signalling defects. We retrospectively report prenatal genetics in a series of 8 families. RESULTS International variation in legislation, guidelines, expert opinion, as well as cultural and religious background of families and clinicians results in variable utilization of preimplantation and prenatal genetic testing for IL-10 signalling defects. Eleven referrals for prenatal diagnosis for IL-10 signalling defects were identified across 4 countries. We report on 8 families who underwent prenatal preimplantation monogenic testing after in vitro fertilization (n = 2) and/or by amniocentesis/chorion villus sampling (n = 6). A genetic diagnosis was established in 1 foetus and excluded in 7 foetuses (all IL10RA variants). CONCLUSIONS Prenatal genetic testing for IL10R-defects is feasible, yet the legal and ethical considerations are complex and controversial. In some countries, predictive genetics for IL-10-related signalling defects is entering clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziqing Ye
- Department of Gastroenterology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Wenhui Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bingbing Wu
- Key Lab of Birth Defects, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yueping Zhang
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Caixia Lei
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Isabelle Williams
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dror S. Shouval
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Edmond and Lily Safra Children’s Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Ramag Gan, Israel and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hirokazu Kanegane
- Department of Child Health and Development, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kyung Mo Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center Children’s Hospital 88, Olympic-Ro 43 Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Lissy de Ridder
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neil Shah
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Galina Ling
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Baruch Yerushalmi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Daniel Kotlarz
- Department of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Scott Snapper
- Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ruth Horn
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities and the Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Christoph Klein
- Department of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Aleixo M. Muise
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre and Cell Biology Program, Research Institute
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Holm H. Uhlig
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Research Center, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lázaro-Muñoz G, Pereira S, Carmi S, Lencz T. Screening embryos for polygenic conditions and traits: ethical considerations for an emerging technology. Genet Med 2020; 23:432-434. [PMID: 33106616 PMCID: PMC7936952 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01019-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shai Carmi
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Todd Lencz
- Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Division of Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.,Institute for Behavioral Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Snoek R, Stokman MF, Lichtenbelt KD, van Tilborg TC, Simcox CE, Paulussen ADC, Dreesen JCMF, van Reekum F, Lely AT, Knoers NVAM, de Die-Smulders CEM, van Eerde AM. Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Kidney Disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:1279-1286. [PMID: 32855195 PMCID: PMC7480540 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03550320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A genetic cause can be identified for an increasing number of pediatric and adult-onset kidney diseases. Preimplantation genetic testing (formerly known as preimplantation genetic diagnostics) is a reproductive technology that helps prospective parents to prevent passing on (a) disease-causing mutation(s) to their offspring. Here, we provide a clinical overview of 25 years of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic kidney disease in The Netherlands. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS This is a retrospective cohort study of couples counseled on preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic kidney disease in the national preimplantation genetic testing expert center (Maastricht University Medical Center+) from January 1995 to June 2019. Statistical analysis was performed through chi-squared tests. RESULTS In total, 98 couples were counseled regarding preimplantation genetic testing, of whom 53% opted for preimplantation genetic testing. The most frequent indications for referral were autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (38%), Alport syndrome (26%), and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (9%). Of couples with at least one preimplantation genetic testing cycle with oocyte retrieval, 65% experienced one or more live births of an unaffected child. Of couples counseled, 38% declined preimplantation genetic testing for various personal and technical reasons. CONCLUSIONS Referrals, including for adult-onset disease, have increased steadily over the past decade. Though some couples decline preimplantation genetic testing, in the couples who proceed with at least one preimplantation genetic testing cycle, almost two thirds experienced at least one live birth rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rozemarijn Snoek
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marijn F Stokman
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Klaske D Lichtenbelt
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Theodora C van Tilborg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cindy E Simcox
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Aimée D C Paulussen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos C M F Dreesen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Franka van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Titia Lely
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nine V A M Knoers
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kilbride MK. In vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing: the need for expanded insurance coverage. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2020; 47:medethics-2019-105879. [PMID: 32817410 PMCID: PMC7892638 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Technological advances in genetic testing have enabled prospective parents to learn about their risk of passing a genetic condition to their future children. One option for those who want to ensure that their biological children do not inherit a genetic condition is to create embryos through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and use a technique called preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to screen embryos for genetic abnormalities before implantation. Unfortunately, due to its high cost, IVF-with-PGT is out of reach for the vast majority of Americans. This article addresses an issue that has been underexplored in the medical ethics literature: the lack of insurance coverage for IVF-with-PGT.Within the US system, a key concept in insurance is that of medically necessary care, which broadly consists of diagnostic services and treatment services. In this article, I argue that IVF-with-PGT could be classified as either a diagnostic service or as a treatment service. To make this case, I show that IVF-with-PGT is similar to other types of services that are often covered by US insurance providers. In light of these similarities, I argue that the current system is inconsistent with respect to what is-and is not-covered by insurance. To promote consistency and fairness in coverage, like cases should be treated alike-starting with greater coverage for IVF-with-PGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison K Kilbride
- Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
How will new genetic technologies, such as gene editing, change reproductive decision-making? Views of high-risk couples. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 29:39-50. [PMID: 32773775 PMCID: PMC7852899 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-00706-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Couples at increased risk of having offspring with a specific genetic disorder who want to avoid having an affected child have several reproductive options including prenatal diagnosis (PND) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). In the future, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD), germline gene editing (GGE) and somatic gene editing (SGE) might become available. This study explores if, and how, availability of new genetic technologies, including NIPD, GGE, SGE, would change reproductive decision-making of high-risk couples. In 2018, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 genetically at-risk couples. Couples previously had received genetic counselling for PND and PGT, and in most cases opted for (one of) these techniques, at one Dutch Clinical Genetics Center between 2013 and 2017. Considerations participants mentioned regarding the hypothetical use of NIPD, GGE and SGE, seem similar to considerations regarding PND and PGT and are reflected in underlying concepts. These include safety and burden for mother and child, and moral considerations. Couples generally favoured NIPD over PND as this would be safe and enables earlier diagnosis. Increased opportunities of having a 'healthy' embryo and less embryo disposal were considerations in favour of GGE. Some regarded GGE as unsafe and feared slippery slope scenarios. Couples were least favourable towards SGE compared to choosing for a genetic reproductive technology, because of the perceived burden for the affected offspring. With the possibly growing number of technological options, understanding high risk couples' perspectives can assist in navigating the reproductive decision-making process. Counsellors should be prepared to counsel on more and complex reproductive options.
Collapse
|
26
|
Zuckerman S, Gooldin S, Zeevi DA, Altarescu G. The decision-making process, experience, and perceptions of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) users. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:1903-1912. [PMID: 32462417 PMCID: PMC7468006 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01840-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The decision to undergo preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) entails a variety of personal and societal variables. Although PGT technology is widely accepted and used, few studies have queried the motives and concerns of PGT users; moreover, in-depth qualitative data regarding the PGT experience is scant. METHODS In order to explore and analyze the experience, concerns, expectations, and attitudes toward the PGT technique and its implications, semi-structured interviews were conducted in a single tertiary medical center with 43 Israeli PGT users for HLA matching and autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked genetic disorders. RESULTS The primary considerations in choosing PGT were prevention of birth of a child who would suffer a terminal or chronic disease as well as abrogation of a familial genetic condition. Religion played a decisive role in accepting PGT as an antenatal option. Regarding satisfaction with the PGT experience, many interviewees highlighted the need for greater attention to be given to potential stages of failure throughout the procedure and the need for emotional support. Our clinical results regarding implantation rate and cumulative live birth rate are 38-40% and 27-30%, respectively. CONCLUSION This survey broadens understanding of the specialized needs of women, couples, and minority groups undergoing PGT and underscores the relevance of counseling services for PGT users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shachar Zuckerman
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center- Medical Genetics Institute, Jerusalem, Israel.
- Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University , Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Sigal Gooldin
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David A Zeevi
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center- Preimplantation Genetic Unit, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gheona Altarescu
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center- Medical Genetics Institute, Jerusalem, Israel
- Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University , Jerusalem, Israel
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center- Preimplantation Genetic Unit, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rothwell E, Lamb B, Johnson E, Gurtcheff S, Riches N, Fagan M, Sabatello M, Johnstone E. Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options. Ther Adv Reprod Health 2020; 14:2633494119899942. [PMID: 32518912 PMCID: PMC7254585 DOI: 10.1177/2633494119899942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. Methods: Interviews (n = 37) were conducted among female patients who had undergone in vitro fertilization, underwent expanded carrier screening, and were offered pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between July 2016 and July 2017. The interviews were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted on the transcripts. Results: Categories that emerged from the data analysis included unexpected outcomes, uncertainty, unanticipated emotional consequences, too much emphasis on the woman’s contributions and questions about embryo viability. Patient experiences with genetic technologies during in vitro fertilization played a significant role within these results. Conclusion: The emotional and psychological impacts of infertility during in vitro fertilization were the primary concerns discussed by participants. Future research is needed to identify ways to help manage unexpected outcomes and continuous uncertainty, including the increasing use of genetic technologies, to not add to the psychological burden of infertility. There is a need to explore more support options or counseling services for patients struggling with infertility during in vitro fertilization treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Rothwell
- Associate Vice President for Research, Integrity and Compliance, The University of Utah, 75 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Brandy Lamb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Erin Johnson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Naomi Riches
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Melinda Fagan
- Department of Philosophy, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Maya Sabatello
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erica Johnstone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pastore LM, Rubin LR, SantaBarbara JN, Stelling J, Lobel M. Initial psychometric analysis of novel instruments to assess decisional distress and decisional uncertainty in women who have considered using preimplantation genetic testing. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40:1220-1227. [PMID: 32367519 PMCID: PMC10041134 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze psychometric properties of two novel instruments assessing decisional distress and uncertainty experienced by individuals considering preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). METHODS The new PGT Decisional Distress instrument (22 items) assesses negative/positive emotions. The new PGT Decisional Uncertainty instrument assesses Clarity about test benefits/disadvantages (5 items) and Certainty of having adequate information/support to make a good decision (7 items). Scales ranged from 0 to 4. Psychometrics (central tendencies, internal consistency reliability, and discriminant validity) were evaluated. Stratified analysis by decision stage was conducted. All participants had considered or used PGT in the previous 6 months. RESULTS N = 106 females (mean age 36.5 ± 4.8 years; 16% non-Caucasian; 9% Hispanic) across 16 US states completed an online anonymous questionnaire. On average, respondents reported minimal distress (mean 0.96), high clarity (mean 3.26), and high certainty (mean 3.06), particularly those who had already decided compared to undecided women (P ≤ .02). Instruments had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α's 0.92-0.94) and displayed sufficient inter-individual variability (SD's 0.75-0.89). Correlations confirmed expected patterns of association between instruments (P's < .01), indicating discriminant validity. CONCLUSION We document initial reliability and validity of new instruments to measure emotional distress and uncertainty in female patients who have recently considered PGT for single-gene or chromosomal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M. Pastore
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine Stony Brook Medicine Stony Brook New York USA
| | - Lisa R. Rubin
- Department of Psychology The New School for Social Research New York New York USA
| | | | - James Stelling
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine Stony Brook Medicine Stony Brook New York USA
| | - Marci Lobel
- Department of Psychology Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
De Krom G, Severijns Y, Vlieg WL, Arens YHJM, Van Golde RJT, De Die-Smulders CEM, Van Osch LADM. Motives and considerations regarding PGT in couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality: a qualitative exploration. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:1719-1727. [PMID: 32418135 PMCID: PMC7376769 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01810-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to describe the motives and considerations of couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality deciding on preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Methods A qualitative exploratory study was conducted using semi-structured dyadic interviews with 13 couples (N = 26) carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality. All couples had an informative consultation in our PGT centre in the Netherlands. Results Almost all couples considered PGT or natural conception combined with prenatal diagnosis (PND) as the only two reproductive options. Among several considerations mentioned, the majority indicated that the wish to increase the chance of a successful pregnancy was the most important motive to opt for PGT. All couples who opted for PGT had first tried to conceive spontaneously and entered the PGT programme because of their adverse experiences during these attempts (infertility, recurrent miscarriage, termination of pregnancy, birth of an affected child). Couples that refrained from PGT were of advanced maternal age and expressed the long trajectory of PGT as the main reason to refrain. If conceiving spontaneously would not lead to an ongoing pregnancy, these couples also indicated that they would use PGT. Conclusion This study shows that couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality consider PGT and spontaneous conception with PND as relevant reproductive options. They are looking for the option that is in their opinion the fastest way to establish a successful pregnancy. Information on the perceived pros and cons of PGT or spontaneous conception in these couples can help to optimize counselling and psychological support during the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G De Krom
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Y Severijns
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - W L Vlieg
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Y H J M Arens
- School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R J T Van Golde
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C E M De Die-Smulders
- School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L A D M Van Osch
- Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
McNeill A, Lewis R, Freeth M. Views of adults with 22q11 deletion syndrome on reproductive choices. Am J Med Genet A 2020; 182:1284-1287. [PMID: 32154643 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alisdair McNeill
- Department of Neuroscience, Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, Sheffield, UK.,Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ruth Lewis
- Department of Neuroscience, Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, Sheffield, UK
| | - Megan Freeth
- Department of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Würgler Hansen A, Sønderberg Roos LK, Løssl K, Godballe C, Mathiesen JS. Preimplantation Genetic Testing of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2A. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:572151. [PMID: 33178136 PMCID: PMC7592389 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.572151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: When discussing matters of reproduction, the 2015 revised guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma recommend that patients diagnosed with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN 2A) are informed about the option of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M). In addition, patients seem to have a genuine interest in reproductive options. However, there are just two reports worldwide of this technology being used for patients with MEN 2A. We here present, in a Danish couple where the man has MEN 2A, the first European family with children born after PGT-M. Objective: To report the results of PGT-M in relation to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A with the aim to increase awareness among physicians treating this and other genetic disorders. Methods: A Danish couple was referred to the PGT Center at Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet and opted for PGT-M after counseling by a clinical geneticist and a fertility doctor. The embryos were diagnosed using microsatellite polymorphic marker close to RET. Results: The couple had two healthy children born in 2017 and 2019 as a result of a total of three ICSI treatments including controlled ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval and PGT-M, and a total of six blastocyst transfers. Conclusion: A session with a clinical geneticist covering all reproductive options for patients in early adult life is a relevant part of the clinical management of patients with MEN 2A, and other patients with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Würgler Hansen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- The Emergency Department, Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Esbjerg, Denmark
- *Correspondence: Anders Würgler Hansen
| | | | - Kristine Løssl
- The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Godballe
- Department of ORL Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jes Sloth Mathiesen
- Department of ORL Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yeager S, Mehta S, Sodhi M, Shah B. Can preimplantation genetic diagnosis be used for monogenic endocrine diseases? J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2019; 32:1305-1310. [PMID: 31490775 DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2019-0184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Context Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is currently used for over 400 monogenic diseases. Some endocrine conditions that occur due to monogenic defects are either life-threatening or can cause severe morbidities; thus, PGD may be an option to avoid the occurrence of such diseases. Evidence acquisition An initial search in PubMed/Medline search was done to identify monogenic endocrine conditions using appropriate search terms. Eleven articles (1999-2018) reported 15 cases using PGD for monogenic endocrine diseases performed at major reproductive centers. Clinical and outcome data of these cases were reviewed with respect to the number of PGD cycles, successful pregnancy rates, live births and their genetic status. Evidence synthesis Fifteen couples underwent 32 PGD cycles (one to nine per couple), of which 17 resulted in a pregnancy. Seven couples underwent a single PGD cycle. Four couples had successful pregnancies each resulting in live births, one couple had an unsuccessful pregnancy, one needed medical termination of pregnancy and the outcome data were not reported in one. The remaining eight couples underwent multiple PGD cycles (two to nine per couple) and all had successful pregnancies in at least one cycle resulting in 16 live births. Of the total live births, 60% were genetically unaffected and 40% were carriers of the autosomal recessive gene mutation. Conclusions PGD may be a potential tool for preventing the inheritance of severe monogenic endocrine diseases in future generations. Currently, the use of PGD in endocrine disorders is rare but provides a promising option on a case-by-case basis, provided the optimal resources are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shilpa Mehta
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Misha Sodhi
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bina Shah
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA, Phone: +212-562-3793
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pastore LM, Cordeiro Mitchell CN, Rubin LR, Nicoloro-SantaBarbara J, Genoff Garzon MC, Lobel M. Patients' preimplantation genetic testing decision-making experience: an opinion on related psychological frameworks. Hum Reprod Open 2019; 2019:hoz019. [PMID: 31598567 PMCID: PMC6777985 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoz019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The process of deciding whether to pursue preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of an embryo is highly stressful for individuals and couples and has adverse emotional consequences (e.g. distress and uncertainty). PGT influences patients’ lives in both positive and negative ways and is experienced at an individual level, as a dyadic unit, as a family member and as part of the society. Here, we argue that providing a conceptual framework with which to understand the `experience of decision making’ about PGT for monogenic disease (PGT-M) testing specifically, as well as the factors contributing to `decisional distress’ and `uncertainty’ that patients endure as a result—apart from what decision they make—is crucial to optimizing patient counseling, satisfaction and outcomes in the field of ART. Derived from psychological theory, the framework proposed here identifies three categories of contributing factors to decisional distress and uncertainty in considering PGT-M; namely, ‘intraindividual’, ‘interpersonal’ and ‘situational’ factors. We reviewed evidence from the PGT literature to inform our framework. Well-accepted theories of stress and health decision making were also reviewed for their relevance to PGT-M decision making, focusing on potential distress and uncertainty. Our novel conceptual framework can be used to inform clinical practice, to advance research and to aid the development of interventions for individuals and couples who are deciding whether or not to use PGT-M. Alleviating emotional distress and uncertainty can improve patients’ well-being during their reproductive journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Pastore
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - C N Cordeiro Mitchell
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - L R Rubin
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - M C Genoff Garzon
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Lobel
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pastore LM, Christianson MS, McGuinness B, Vaught KC, Maher JY, Kearns WG. Does theFMR1 gene affect IVF success? Reprod Biomed Online 2018; 38:560-569. [PMID: 30711457 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
FMR1 CGG trinucleotide repeat expansions are associated with Fragile X syndrome (full mutations) and primary ovarian insufficiency (premutation range); the effect of FMR1 on the success of fertility treatment is unclear. The effect of FMR1 CGG repeat lengths on IVF outcomes after ovarian stimulation was reviewed. PubMed was searched for studies on IVF-related outcomes reported by FMR1 trinucleotide repeat length published between 2002 and December 2017. For women with CGG repeats in the normal (<45 CGG), intermediate range (45-54 CGG), or both, research supports a minimal effect on IVF outcomes, including pregnancy rates; although one study reported lower oocyte yields after IVF stimulation in women with lower CGG repeat lengths and normal ovarian reserve. Meta-analysis revealed no association within subcategories of normal repeat length (<45 CGG) and IVF pregnancy rates (summary OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15). Premutation carriers (CGG 55-200) may have reduced success with IVF treatment (lower oocyte yield) than women with a normal CGG repeat length or a full mutation, although findings are inconsistent. Direct implications of the repeat length on inheritance and the risk of Fragile X syndrome have been observed. Patients may require clinical and psychological counselling, and further preimplantation genetic testing options should be considered. Thus, there are clinical and psychological counseling implications for patients and potential further patient decisions regarding preimplantation genetic testing options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Pastore
- OB/GYN and Reproductive Medicine Department, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York USA
| | - Mindy S Christianson
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA
| | | | - Kamaria Cayton Vaught
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA
| | - Jacqueline Y Maher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pre-implantation genetic testing: decisional factors to accept or decline among in vitro fertilization patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35:1605-1612. [PMID: 30074131 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1278-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Embryo testing to improve pregnancy outcomes among individuals who are seeking assisted reproduction technologies is increasing. The purpose of this study was to assess decisional factors through in-depth interviews for why women would accept or decline preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 37 women who were offered PGT-A with IVF during the summer 2017. Interviews lasted on average 40 min and were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a content analysis. RESULTS Results identified a number of decisional factors related to values about conception, disability, and pregnancy termination, past pregnancy experiences, optimism toward technology, and cost. Other key issues that were identified include the use of expanded carrier screening prior to IVF, maternal age, and limited education about PGT-A due to the complexity about education for IVF alone. CONCLUSION There is a need to develop decision support tools for the increasing choices of genetic testing options for patients seeking IVF. Including patients' values, past pregnancy experiences and attitudes toward science into the decision-making process may help promote a more informed decision.
Collapse
|
36
|
Goldman RH, Racowsky C, Farland LV, Fox JH, Munné S, Ribustello L, Ginsburg ES. The cost of a euploid embryo identified from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a counseling tool. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35:1641-1650. [PMID: 30066304 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1275-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the expected out-of-pocket costs of IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to attain a 50%, 75%, or 90% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst based on individual age and AMH, and develop a personalized counseling tool. METHODS A cost analysis was performed and a counseling tool was developed using retrospective data from IVF cycles intended for PGT or blastocyst freeze-all between January 1, 2014 and August 31, 2017 (n = 330) and aggregate statistics on euploidy rates of > 149,000 embryos from CooperGenomics. Poisson regression was used to determine the number of biopsiable blastocysts obtained per cycle, based on age and AMH. The expected costs of attaining a 50%, 75%, and 90% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst were determined via 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations for each age and AMH combination, incorporating age-based euploidy rates and IVF/PGT-A cost assumptions. RESULTS The cost to attain a 50% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst ranges from approximately $15,000 U.S. dollars (USD) for younger women with higher AMH values (≥ 2 ng/mL) to > $150,000 for the oldest women (44 years) with the lowest AMH values (< 0.1 ng/mL) in this cohort. The cost to attain a 75% versus 90% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst is similar (~ $16,000) for younger women with higher AMH values, but varies for the oldest women with low AMH values (~ $280,000 and > $450,000, respectively). A typical patient (36-37 years, AMH 2.5 ng/mL) should expect to spend ~ $30,000 for a 90% likelihood of attaining a euploid embryo. CONCLUSIONS This tool can serve as a counseling adjunct by providing individualized cost information for patients regarding PGT-A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randi H Goldman
- Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Catherine Racowsky
- Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Leslie V Farland
- Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Janis H Fox
- Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Santiago Munné
- CooperGenomics, Clinical, Livingston, NJ, 07039, USA
- Overture Life, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Elizabeth S Ginsburg
- Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|