"Three-in-one" patient-specific surgical guides for simultaneous dental implants in fibula flap jaw reconstruction: A prospective case series

Innovative principle of implant-oriented fibula placement in mandibular reconstruction using double-barrel fibula and simultaneous implants: A technical note

Simultaneous or secondary inserted implants with double-barrel fibula to reconstruct the mandible have become a common method. However, difficulties in later restoration caused by placement errors of fibula or incipiently placed implants have also been reported in some studies. This note describes a novel technique of implant-oriented guide plates helpful for mandible ablation, fibula segmentation and positioning, and implant placement. We design a series of guide plates especially an implant-fibula placing guide plate, and record and fix the relative spatial positions of the remaining teeth, the simultaneous implants and upper fibula. During surgery, the placement of upper fibula is oriented towards appropriate placement of implants. Therefore, the position of upper fibula can meet the requirements of simultaneous implant as much as possible. Within the limits of present observation, we believe that this technique may increase the manipuility while reducing the errors and the risk of complications.

One-stage jaw reconstruction and prosthetic rehabilitation with an iliac flap: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

One-stage jaw reconstruction with fibular flap and prosthetic rehabilitation restores bony and dental continuity simultaneously. It was also called as "jaw-in-a-day (JIAD)" technique. However, bone volume and height of fibular flap may be insufficient for dental implant insertion. The provision of a considerable amount of bone makes an iliac flap the ideal choice in these cases. We present the first case report to document the use of one-stage jaw reconstruction and prosthetic rehabilitation with the iliac flap.

CASE PRESENTATION

We modified the conventional JIAD workflow to make it suitable for iliac flap. Two cases were presented who both underwent segmental mandibulectomy for ameloblastoma. Virtual surgical planning was performed in all cases. The iliac crest was positioned upward to provide cortical bone for achieving primary stability of dental implants. Similar to the "all-on-4" procedure, the iliac bone was placed 12 to 15 mm below the occlusal plane to create adequate space for the implant-retained prosthesis. Immediate implant-based dental rehabilitation was performed at same stage. The surgery was successful in all cases without any short-term complications. In the first postoperative week, patients were given a liquid diet through a nasal feeding tube. The liquid diet is advised until 1 month after the surgery. Thereafter, a soft diet is recommended. Patients were advised to resume routine mastication and normal diet 3 months after the surgery. Peri-implantitis occurred in one patient, and additional gingival graft was required. Postoperative function and esthetics were satisfactory at the last follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage jaw reconstruction and prosthetic rehabilitation with the iliac flap are safe and useful for restoring postoperative function and esthetics. It should be used in more cases with a longer follow-up in further studies.

Meta-analysis of the survival rate and postoperative infection rate of primary and secondary implants after vascularized fibula transplantation for reconstruction of jaw defects

OBJECTIVES

Vascularized fibula flap transplantation is the most effective and common method to repair the jaw defects. In addition, implantation is the first choice to restore dentition on the graft fibula. Implants are usually implanted at least 6 months after fibula transplantation. Primary implantation of implants during surgery can restore the dentition earlier, but whether this method can achieve the same restorative effect as secondary implantation is still uncertain. This article aims to compare the survival rate and complications between primary and secondary implantation through meta-analysis.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA protocol and the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare the survival rate and postoperative infection rate of primary and secondary implantation.

RESULTS

Seven studies were involved in our research, involving 186 patients. Five of the studies detailed implant success in 106 patients (primary implantation 50, secondary implantation 56), and four studies documented infection after implantation in 117 patients (primary implantation 52, secondary implantation 65); the survival rate of the primary implantation was 93.3%, and the incidence of postoperative infection was 17.3%. The survival rate of the secondary implantation was 93.4%, and 23.1% had postoperative infection. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the survival rate between primary implantation and secondary implantation, OR = 0.813 (95% CI 0.383-1.725, P = 0.589 > 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative infection, OR = 0.614 (95% CI 0.239-1.581, P = 0.312 > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this study, the research found no significant difference in the survival rate or infection rates between primary and secondary implantation. After appropriate indications selection, primary implantation can be used to reconstruct the dentition with less waiting time, reduce the impact of radiotherapy, and bring a higher quality of life for patients.

Fibula Jaw-during-Admission

BACKGROUND

Fibula Jaw-in-a-Day (JIAD) is considered the most advanced approach for segmental mandibular defect reconstruction and dental rehabilitation. However, it has limitations and challenges for further pursuit. We propose Fibula Jaw-during-Admission (JDA) as a solution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2019 to 2021, six patients received fibula "Jaw-during-Admission." Segmental mandibulectomy, fibula transfer, and immediate dental implantation were performed simultaneously during a single surgery. Intraoral scans were used to fabricate temporary light occlusion contact dental prostheses while on the ward prior to discharge during the first and second week post operation. The prostheses were installed before discharge and changed to permanent ones with normal occlusal contact in the clinic at about six months after X-ray confirmation of bone healing.

RESULTS

All six surgeries succeeded. Four patients received palatal muco-periosteal graft after debridement of peri-implant overgrown granulation tissue. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 34 months (average 21.2 months) and revealed good function and appearance in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Fibula JDA is superior to the Fibula JIAD approach for simultaneous mandibular reconstruction with fibula and dental rehabilitation. There is no need for postoperative intermaxillary fixation. The surgery can be performed more reliably with less stress. It provides an additional opportunity for dental rehabilitation if initial dental prosthesis installation during JIAD fails. Postreconstruction intraoral scans provide greater precision and more flexibility in milling dental prosthesis which are mapped to the reconstructed mandible during the postoperative period.

A digital workflow to predict facial aesthetics in patients with maxillofacial trauma with implant retained prostheses

PURPOSE

To introduce a digital workflow for the prediction of facial aesthetics, especially in patients with dentation deformity caused by maxillofacial trauma.

METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional facial scans of patients with radiographic prostheses were collected. The aforementioned data were uploaded to ProPlan CMF software and merged to generate a virtual patient with craniofacial hard tissue, realistic facial soft tissue, and remaining dentition. The radiographic prostheses were scanned to form a digital cast, which was fitted with its CBCT image to create the virtual prostheses. Postoperative facial soft tissue was simulated according to the movement of the virtual prostheses. An appropriate virtual diagnostic prosthesis plan was selected by the patient and dentist. Subsequently, prosthetically driven implant guide and restoration were designed and fabricated.

CONCLUSIONS

A virtual patient was successfully constructed. A 4-mm protrusion of the virtual prosthesis was chosen. Subsequently, implant surgery was performed, and dental prostheses were fabricated based on this location. The fusion of the postoperative facial scan and preoperative facial prediction was found to be coincident. This technique can effectively predict facial aesthetic features of patients with maxillofacial trauma, facilitate communication with patients, reduce chairside time, and guide the multidisciplinary design of implant placement and restoration fabrication.

Current Trends in the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of Jaw following Ablative Surgery

Simple Summary

The Maxilla and mandible provide skeletal support for of the middle and lower third of our faces, allowing for the normal functioning of breathing, chewing, swallowing, and speech. The ablative surgery of jaws in the past often led to serious disfigurement and disruption in form and function. However, with recent strides made in computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific implants, the individual functional reconstruction of the jaw is evolving rapidly and the prompt rehabilitation of both the masticatory function and aesthetics after jaw resection has been made possible. In the present review, the recent advancements in jaw reconstruction technology and future perspectives will be discussed.

Abstract

The reconstruction and rehabilitation of jaws following ablative surgery have been transformed in recent years by the development of computer-assisted surgery and virtual surgical planning. In this narrative literature review, we aim to discuss the current state-of-the-art jaw reconstruction, and to preview the potential future developments. The application of patient-specific implants and the “jaw-in-a-day technique” have made the fast restoration of jaws’ function and aesthetics possible. The improved efficiency of primary reconstructive surgery allows for the rehabilitation of neurosensory function following ablative surgery. Currently, a great deal of research has been conducted on augmented/mixed reality, artificial intelligence, virtual surgical planning for soft tissue reconstruction, and the rehabilitation of the stomatognathic system. This will lead to an even more exciting future for the functional reconstruction and rehabilitation of the jaw following ablative surgery.

Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Miniplates for Free Flap Fixation at the Mandible: A Feasibility Study

Background

This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, clinical outcomes, and accuracy of patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates for mandible reconstruction with fibula free flaps.

Methods

A feasibility study was conducted with 8 patients. Following virtual planning, patient-specific 1.0 mm titanium non-locking miniplates were produced via laser selective melting. 3D-printed cutting and drilling guides were used for segmental mandible resection and flap harvesting. Flap fixation was performed with two 4-hole miniplates and 2.0 mm non-locking screws (screw length 7 mm) for each intersegmental gap. Clinical follow-up was at least 6 months. Preoperative and postoperative CT/cone beam CT data were used for 3D accuracy analysis and evaluation of bone healing. Plate-related complications were monitored clinically.

Results

Patient-specific miniplate fixation of all flaps was successfully conducted (4 mono-segmental, 4 dual-segmental) with high accuracy (3.64 ± 1.18 mm) between the virtual plan and postoperative result. No technical complications were encountered intraoperatively. Osseous union occurred in all intersegmental gaps (1 partial, 18 complete) after 10 ± 2 months. No material fracture, dislocation, or plate exposure was observed.

Conclusions

Based on this pilot observational study including a limited number of patients, free flap fixation for mandibular reconstruction with patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates is feasible and associated with high accuracy, bone healing, and remote soft tissue complications.

A Comparative Study on a Novel Fibula Malleolus Cap to Increase the Accuracy of Oncologic Jaw Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

Although computer-assisted surgery using fibula flap has been widely applied for oncologic jaw reconstruction in recent years, the inaccurate positioning of the fibula harvest guide brings sliding and rotational errors, which leads to compromised accuracy in simultaneous implant placement and dental rehabilitation. This study aimed to develop a novel three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific fibula malleolus cap to increase oncologic reconstruction accuracy.

METHODS

In this prospective comparative study with a recent historical control cohort, patients in need of oncologic jaw reconstruction with fibula free flaps were recruited. In the study group, the fibula was harvested with the guide of the malleolus cap, whereas in the control group, without the malleolus cap. Deviations of location and angulation of distal fibula osteotomies, jaw reconstruction segments, and simultaneous dental implants were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were recruited, with 10 in each arm. The application of the malleolus cap significantly reduced the deviations in locations and angles of distal fibula osteotomies, from 9.5 to 4.1 mm and 25.3° to 8.7°. For the simultaneous dental implants placed in the fibula flaps, there was a significant increase in the accuracy of implant platform locations (the average deviation from 3.2 to 1.3 mm), apex locations (from 3.8 to 1.5 mm), and angles (from 11.3° to 4.6°). No significant difference was detected in the accuracy of fibula reconstruction segments.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a novel fibula malleolus cap to overcome the sliding and rotational errors during fibula flap harvesting for oncologic jaw reconstruction, with increased accuracy in simultaneous dental implants. This is a step forward to achieve a satisfactory functional outcome of jaw reconstruction with dental rehabilitation.

The Learning Curve of Computer-Assisted Free Flap Jaw Reconstruction Surgery Using 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Plates: A Cumulative Sum Analysis

Background

Computer-assisted jaw reconstruction (CAJR) has benefits in reducing operation time and improving reconstruction accuracy, compared to conventional freehand jaw reconstruction. However, no information is available regarding learning curves in CAJR with the use of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical plates (PSSP). The purpose of this study was to assess surgical outcomes and learning curve for the first 58 consecutive CAJR using 3D-printed PSSP performed by a single surgical team in a single institution.

Methods

In a prospective study, consecutive patients who underwent free flap CAJR using 3D-printed PSSP were included. The determination of proficiency, based on the cumulative sum of surgical success (no major adjustment of 3D-printed PSSP, flap survival) passing the acceptable boundary line of cumulative sum analysis, was the primary outcome. To find out any potential factors influencing the learning curve, baseline characteristics of patients were compared before and after proficiency achievement. Secondary outcomes included inflexion points of the total operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation, measured by the cumulative sum analysis.

Results

From December 2016 to November 2020, 58 consecutive cases underwent surgery performed by a single surgical team. The overall surgical success rate was 94.8% (55/58). A three-stage learning curve of primary outcome was observed. The proficiency was achieved after 23 cases. The proportions of advanced tumor staging and concomitant surgery after obtaining proficiency were significantly higher than those before achieving proficiency (p = 0.046 and p < 0.001, respectively). Mean values of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation were 532.5 ± 119.2 min, 1,006.8 ± 547.2 ml, 16.1 ± 6.3 days, and 0.9 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. Two trends of learning curve were observed in the CUSUM analyses of total operation time, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation, in which the first and second inflexion points occurred between 8 and 17 cases and between 43 and 46 cases, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results revealed a three-stage learning curve of CAJR with the use of PSSP, including initial learning, plateau, and overlearning. Based on CUSUM analysis, the surgical proficiency was achieved after 23 cases, and total operation time, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation stabilized after 8–17 cases.