Factors affecting peri-implant bone loss: a post-five-year retrospective study

The Effect of Prosthetic Factors on the Long-Term Survival of Dental Implants: A Narrative Review

The success of implants depends on the biological and mechanical factors of the implant, as well as on the chosen prosthesis, which has different characteristics that can affect the survival of the implant and its marginal bone levels. Therefore, when choosing the type of prosthesis, it is necessary to understand and consider each of these variables and tailor them to the relevant clinical situation. In this narrative review, we will assess the types of prostheses, their different characteristics, timing, and their impact on implant survival and marginal bone levels, as accepted in today's literature.

Comparing Bone Graft Success, Implant Survival Rate, and Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study on Materials and Influential Factors

Bone grafting serves to restore the alveolar bone defect, providing adequate alveolar bone essential for long-term implant survival. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the success rate of guided bone regeneration (GBR) bone grafting and investigate the survival rate of implants and the degree of marginal bone loss (MBL) around implants. Furthermore, the influence of confounding factors such as patient conditions, bone graft properties, and implant characteristics was assessed. This study was carried out on treatment outcomes of patients with implants between January 2007 and December 2016, using various graft materials, including autograft, allograft, and xenograft. In a mean follow-up of 70 months (range: 3-10 years), the overall success rate of bone graft (n = 80) was 100%, and the overall survival rate of implant (n = 107) was 97.2% (autograft: 100%, allograft: 100%, and xenograft: 92.9%; P = .03). Mean MBL up to 3 years after implant installation were similar among graft materials, with 0.84 ± 0.48 mm in autograft, 0.73 ± 0.42 mm in allograft, and 1.01 ± 0.59 mm in xenograft (P = .14). Posterior mandibular location had a significant influence on implant survival (P = .003). A significant association of MBL with several factors, including age >60 years (P = .03), both diabetes and hypertension (P = .02), without receiving adjunctive membrane (P = .04), loading within 3-6 months (P < .001), and screw-retained crown (P = .008), was confirmed. Our data substantiated that implant rehabilitation with GBR using autograft and allograft provides the most predictable results. The factors above should be carefully considered with xenograft to enhance long-term clinical outcomes.

Biomechanical effects of different materials for an occlusal device on implant-supported rehabilitation in a tooth clenching situation: A 3D finite element analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this 3D finite element analysis was to evaluate the biomechanical effects of different materials used to fabricate occlusal devices to achieve stress distribution in simulated abutment screws, dental implants, and peri-implant bone tissue in individuals who clench their teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight 3D models simulated a posterior maxillary bone block with three external hexagon implants (Ø4.0 × 7.0 mm) supporting a 3-unit screw-retained metal-ceramic prosthesis with different crown connection (splinting), and the use of an occlusal device (OD). The OD was modeled to be 2-mm thick. ANSYS 19.2 software was used to generate the finite-element models in the pre-and post-processing phases. Simulated abutment screws and dental implants were evaluated by von Mises stress maps, and simulated bone was evaluated by maximum principal stress and microstrain maps by using a finite element software program.

RESULTS

The highest stress values in the dental implants and screws were observed in single crowns without OD (M1). Furthermore, the highest stress values and bone tissue strain were found in single crowns without OD (M1). The simulated material for the OD did not cause many discrepancies in terms of the stress magnitude in the simulated dental implant and abutment screw for both single and splinted crowns; however, more rigid materials exhibited lower stress values.

CONCLUSION

The use of OD was effective in reducing stress in the simulated implants and abutment screws and stress and strain in the simulated bone tissue. The material used to simulate the OD influenced the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported fixed prostheses, whereas splints with rigid materials such as PEEK and PMMA exhibited better biomechanical behavior.

Splinting or non-splinting of fixed prostheses on adjacent implants: A critical review

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to identify, through a critical review of the literature, the success factors associated with the splinting of fixed prostheses on adjacent implants of the posterior sectors in partially edentulous patients compared with those not splinted.

STUDY SELECTION

A MEDLINE strategy was implemented based on a research question to systematically search and extract information from databases (PubMed and Scopus) using MeSH terms/keywords identified for each domain. Systematic reviews, clinical and in vitro studies were selected and classified according to eligibility criteria based on the research question and level of evidence using the PRISMA flowchart.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies were selected for data extraction and analysis according to study design (three systematic reviews, 14 clinical studies, and 15 in vitro studies). Overall, the studies found no significant difference in the association between the survival rate and prosthesis type. In clinical studies, there have been no differences in marginal bone loss between splinted and non-splinted prostheses, and the influence of peri-implant status and restorative materials has been poorly evaluated. The distribution of stress and loads determined in the in vitro studies showed results that could favor splinted prostheses; however, are generally associated with implant design.

CONCLUSIONS

The need for splinted or non-splinted adjacent implant-supported prostheses remains controversial. The reviewed evidence indicates that factors such as implant size and its relationship with coronal height could be important in decision-making.

Current appraises of therapeutic applications of nanocurcumin: A novel drug delivery approach for biomaterials in dentistry

Curcumin is a natural herb and polyphenol that is obtained from the medicinal plant Curcuma longa. It's anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-mutagenic, antioxidant and antifungal properties can be leveraged to treat a myriad of oral and systemic diseases. However, natural curcumin has weak solubility, limited bioavailability and undergoes rapid degradation, which severely limits its therapeutic potential. To overcome these drawbacks, nanocurcumin (nCur) formulations have been developed for improved biomaterial delivery and enhanced treatment outcomes. This novel biomaterial holds tremendous promise for the treatment of various oral diseases, the majority of which are caused by dental biofilm. These include dental caries, periodontal disease, root canal infection and peri-implant diseases, as well as other non-biofilm mediated oral diseases such as oral cancer and oral lichen planus. A number of in-vitro studies have demonstrated the antibacterial efficacy of nCur in various formulations against common oral pathogens such as S. mutans, P. gingivalis and E. faecalis, which are strongly associated with dental caries, periodontitis and root canal infection, respectively. In addition, some clinical studies were suggestive of the notion that nCur can indeed enhance the clinical outcomes of oral diseases such as periodontitis and oral lichen planus, but the level of evidence was very low due to the small number of studies and the methodological limitations of the available studies. The versatility of nCur to treat a diverse range of oral diseases augurs well for its future in dentistry, as reflected by rapid pace in which studies pertaining to this topic are published in the scientific literature. In order to keep abreast of the latest development of nCur in dentistry, this narrative review was undertaken. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a contemporaneous update of the chemistry, properties, mechanism of action, and scientific evidence behind the usage of nCur in dentistry.

Clinical, radiographic, and histological/histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus grafting with deproteinized porcine or bovine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to compare histomorphometrically evaluated new bone formation, radiographically measured graft stability, and clinical implant outcome between maxillary sinus grafting with either deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) or deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty maxillary sinuses were initially included and randomly assigned to the test group (TG; DPBM, n = 15) or control group (CG; DBBM, n = 15). After a healing period (6 months), axially retrieved bone biopsies of the molar region were used for histological/histomorphometric analysis of new bone formations. Additionally, radiographically measured graft stability and clinical implant outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three sinus sites with 10 sinuses of the TG and 13 of the CG were ultimately available for data and statistical analysis. In the TG, a slightly, but yet significantly (p = .040) higher proportion of new bone formation (TG: 27.7 ± 5.6% vs. CG: 22.9 ± 5.1%) and a lesser (p = .019) amount of connective (non-mineralized) tissue (TG: 47.5 ± 9.5% vs. CG: 56.1 ± 9.5%) was found than in the CG. However, both xenografts showed comparable (n.s.) residual bone graft (TG: 23.7 ± 7.2% vs. CG: 21.1 ± 9.85.6%), bone-to-graft contacts (TG: 26.2 ± 9.8% vs. CG: 30.8 ± 13.8%), similar graft height reduction over time (TG: 12.9 ± 6.7% CG: 12.4 ± 5.8%) and implant survival/success rate (100%). At the 3-year post-loading evaluation, the peri-implant marginal bone loss (TG: 0.52 ± 0.19 mm; CG: 0.48 ± 0.15 mm) and the peri-implant health conditions (TG: 87.5%/CG: 81.2%) did not differ between implants inserted in both xenografts used.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DPBM or DBBM for maxillary sinus augmentation is associated with comparable bone formation providing stable graft dimension combined with healthy peri-implant conditions.

Transsinusoidal lateral nasal floor augmentation for implant placement in the atrophic premaxilla: A within-patient, 5-year, prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical outcome for implants placed with transsinusoidal-lateral nasal cavity augmentation (NA) compared to implants placed in maxillary sinus augmentation (SA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 28 atrophic edentulous maxillary regions (14 patients bi-maxillary), a lateral window approach was used to perform transsinusoidal-lateral NA (TSLNA) combined with maxillary SA. After healing period of about 6 months, each patient received bimaxillary one anterior implant located in the pre-maxilla having lateral NA and 2-3 implants in the maxillary posterior region with SA. In a prospective follow-up evaluation, clinical implant outcome (survival/success rates) and peri-implant health (mucositis/peri-implantitis) were assessed and compared between implants placed in TSLNA (n = 28) and SA (n = 58).

RESULTS

At the year-1, year-3, and year-5 evaluation, neither patient-based nor implant-based comparisons revealed differences for marginal bone level reduction between implants placed in TSLNA (5-year overall: 1.11 ± 0.26 mm) and SA (5-year overall: 1.07 ± 0.30 mm), although with a significant (p < .001) continuous reduction over the observation time. At the year-5 evaluation, all implants (n = 86) and restorations (n = 14) were still in situ (survival 100%) and showed an implant-based incidence of peri-implant mucositis/peri-implantitis of 14.3%/0% in TSLNA and 6.9%/3.4% in SA corresponding to 21.4%/0% and 28.6%/7.1% for implant-based evaluation. In addition, the implant success rate did not differ between NA and SA at implant- (100%/ 98.8%) and patient-based (100%/97.6%) evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The findings obtained show TSLNA as an effective method for implant placement of adequate length and direction in the atrophic premaxilla providing for success rates comparable to those of implants placed in SA.

Clinical and Radiological Characterization of the Long-Term Association between Unaffected/Minimally Affected Implants and History of Severe Periodontitis: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this research were to compare, retrospectively, the clinical and radiographic modifications of periodontal parameters and peri-implant conditions and to analyze the relationship between the changes in periodontal parameters and peri-implant conditions over a mean follow-up period of 7.6 years in a treated population with progressive/uncontrolled periodontitis and at least one unaffected/minimally affected implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen partially edentulous patients having 77 implants inserted, with a mean age of 54.84 ± 7.60 years, were matched for age, gender, compliance, smoking status, general health, and implant characteristics. Periodontal parameters were evaluated in the remaining teeth. Means per teeth and implants were used when making comparisons.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were observed between baseline and final examination in teeth for tPPD, tCAL and MBL. Furthermore, at 7.6 years, statistically significant differences existed between implants and teeth with regard to iCAL and tCAL (p = 0.03). Multiple regression analyses were performed and revealed a significant association regarding iPPD and CBL with smoking and periodontal diagnosis. In addition, FMBS was significantly associated with CBL. Unaffected/minimally affected implants were found more frequently in the posterior mandible, with longer lengths (>10 mm) and small diameters (<4 mm), including in screwed multi-unit bridges.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results appear to reflect minimally affected mean crestal bone-level loss around implants in comparison to the marginal bone-level loss around teeth when exposed to uncontrolled severe periodontal disease over a mean period of observation of 7.6 years, while the unaffected/minimally affected implants seemed to benefit from a combination of clinical factors, including posterior mandibular position, smaller diameters, and screwed multi-unit restorations.

Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to establish an objective criterion in terms of marginal bone level (MBL) to know the prognosis of an implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A group of 176 patients in whom 590 implants were placed were included in this retrospective study. Patients older than 18 years, presenting either Kennedy class I or II edentulous section, or totally edentulous at least in one of the dental arches were included in this study. Those with any type of disturbance able to alter bone metabolism or with nontreated periodontal disease were excluded. Data on radiographic MBL at loading, 6 and 18 months later, age, gender, smoking habits, history of periodontitis, bone substratum, implant, and prosthetic features were recorded. Nonparametric receiver operating curves (ROC) were constructed for the MBL at 18 months in order to establish a distinction among high bone loser (HBL) and low bone loser (LBL) implants. Differences as a function of main variables were also determined, particularly abutment height and periodontal disease.

RESULTS

HBL implants lost at least 0.48 mm of MBL 6 months after loading; they reached at least 2 mm of MBL 18 months after loading. MBL rate followed a nonlinear trend, except in implants restored over long prosthetic abutments and in patients with history of severe periodontitis; in whom the rate of MBL over the time was nearly zero.

CONCLUSION

Implants that lose more than 0.5 mm of marginal bone 6 months after loading are at great risk of not being radiographically successful anymore. Therefore, 0.5 mm of MBL is proposed as a distinctive and objective criterion of success in Implant Dentistry within a 6-month follow-up period. A prosthetic abutment height ≥2 mm resulted the most protective factor in the peri-implant bone maintenance.

Impact of collar laser microtexturing on peri-implant health and disease: a retrospective clinical study

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study was aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of implants with the same body design but different collar surface (laser-microtextured vs. not laser-microtextured) after functional loading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients (29 females, 14 males) with 139 implants (60 laser-microtextured and 79 without laser microtexturing) were included in this study. Patients were consecutively included, and the data were collected during their implant maintenance visit. Clinical and radiographic parameters including probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), and marginal bone loss (MBL) were recorded. In addition, the implant success index (ISI) score was determined. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis rank test, or the Pearson χ² test, along with binary logistic regression (p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant).

RESULTS

The median post-loading follow-up was 24 months with 100% survival rate. There was no significant differences in terms of mean PD (3.01 mm vs. 2.63 mm), mean MBL (0.54 vs. 0.49 mm), BoP (56.7% vs. 53.2%), and ISI score between laser-microtextured collars and implants without laser microtexturing. Logistic regression revealed arch as a significant predictor of peri-implantitis (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, there was no statistically significant difference between the clinical and radiographic outcomes of implants with laser-microtextured and non-laser-microtextured collar designs. Clinical relevance Prospective studies with larger sample sizes and careful monitoring of implant placement protocols are needed for definite conclusions.

Survival Rates of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses Supported by Short Dental Implants (≤8.5 mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the implant survival rates, marginal bone loss, and mechanical complications of prostheses supported by splinted and nonsplinted short implants (≤8.5 mm).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic database (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and EMBASE) and manual searches up to May 2021 were conducted to identify studies comparing splinted and nonsplinted short implants (≤8.5 mm). The primary outcome was implant survival rate. Secondary outcomes were marginal bone loss and mechanical complications. The quality of included studies and risk-of-bias were assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and featured 1506 short implants (596 nonsplinted and 910 splinted) with a follow-up time ranging from 1 to 16 years. Quantitative analysis found no statistically significant differences between splinted and nonsplinted short implants (≤8.5 mm) for survival rate (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.96, 1.01; p = 0.26)) and marginal bone loss (SMD = -0.08; 95% CI - 0.23, 0.07; p = 0.28). Veneer chipping, abutment screw breakage, screw loosening, and loss of retention were reported in the selected studies as common complications. However, no statistically significant difference was found between splinted and nonsplinted short implants (RR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.20, 1.54; p = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the present meta-analysis, it might be concluded that splinted short implants (≤8.5 mm) do not present superior performance in survival rate, marginal bone maintenance and prevention of mechanical complications compared with single-unit prostheses.

Biomechanical effect of an occlusal device for patients with an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis under parafunctional loading: A 3D finite element analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Whether providing an occlusal device for a patient with bruxism and an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis leads to improved biomechanics is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this 3D finite element analysis (FEA) study was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of 3-unit implant-supported prostheses under parafunctional forces with and without an occlusal device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight 3D models consisting of a posterior (type IV) maxillary bone block with 3 external hexagon implants (Ø4.0×7.0 mm) and 3-unit implant-supported prostheses with different crown connections (splinted or unsplinted) and an occlusal device under functional and parafunctional loading were simulated. The abutment screws were evaluated by von Mises stress maps, and the bone tissue by maximum principal stress and microstrain maps by using a finite element software program.

RESULTS

An occlusal device improved the biomechanical behavior of the prostheses by reducing stress in the abutment screws and stress and strain in the bone tissue. However, the use of an occlusal device was not sufficiently effective to negate the biomechanical benefit of splinting.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of splinted crowns in the posterior maxillary region with an occlusal device was the most effective method of reducing stress in the abutment screws and stress and strain in the bone tissue when parafunction was modeled.

Peri-Implant Behavior of Tissue Level Dental Implants with a Convergent Neck

Introduction: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the radiographic peri-implant bone loss of bone level implants and tissue level implants with a convergent neck in screw-retained single crowns and in screw-retained fixed partial prostheses, after two years of functional loading. Materials and methods: The sample was divided into two groups according to their type: Group I: supracrestal implants with convergent transmucosal neck; Group II: crestal implants. In each group we distinguish two subgroups according to the type of prosthetic restoration: single crowns and a three-piece fixed partial prosthesis on two implants. To quantify bone loss, parallelized periapical radiographs were analyzed at the time of implant placement and after two years of functional load. Results: A total of 120 implants were placed in 53 patients. After statistical analysis it was observed that for each type of implant bone loss was 0.97 ± 0.91 mm for bone level and 0.31 ± 0.48 mm for tissue level. No significant differences were found regarding the type of prosthesis and the location (maxilla or mandible) of the implants. Conclusions: Tissue level implants with a convergent transepithelial neck exhibit less peri-implant bone loss than bone level implants regardless of the type of prosthesis.

Multivariate analysis of the influence of prosthodontic factors on peri-implant bleeding index and marginal bone level in a molar site: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Peri-implant tissue condition can result from prosthodontic, surgical and bacteriological factors.

PURPOSE

This study investigated the effects of prosthodontic factors on peri-implant tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects were 140 patients with 310 implants from Osaka University Dental Hospital. Prosthodontic factors examined were the connection type, the suprastructure retention type, the material of the abutment and the mesiodistal and buccolingual prosthetic form of the superstructure as emergence angle. The objective variables were the modified bleeding index (mBI) and marginal bone level (MBL). Statistical analysis was used as a generalized estimation equation.

RESULTS

The taper joint had a significantly smaller MBL than the butt joint (P < .001). There was no significant difference in mBI and MBL between cement and screw retaining. Zirconium and titanium resulted in a significantly smaller mBI than gold alloy (zirconium/gold alloy: P = .037, titanium / gold alloy: P = .021), but there was no significant difference in the MBL. Both mBI and MBL tended to be smaller when the emergence angle was around 20° to 40°, although this difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION

As a result of multivariate analysis, our findings suggest that to reduce MBL from the perspective of prosthodontic factors it is preferable to use an implant with a taper joint connection positioned with an emergence angle of 20° to 40°.

Free gingival grafts for implants exhibiting a lack of keratinized mucosa: Extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

This study is an extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial that evaluated 18-month outcomes following free gingival grafts (FGGs) around implants with <2 mm keratinized mucosa (KM) compared to implants without KM augmentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Follow-up data were obtained over 48 months from 18 implants in the FGG group (11 subjects) and 8 implants in the no-surgery group (7 subjects) within the control group. FGGs were performed after 18 months for 8 implants in the control group; these 8 implants constituted a delayed FGG group (5 subjects). The width of KM, mucosal recession (MR) and crestal bone level (CBL) were obtained.

RESULTS

The increased width of KM and the reduced MR following FGGs were maintained for 48 months in the FGG group, which exhibited less MR than the no-surgery group. The amount of crestal bone loss (0.4 ± 0.4 mm) in the no-surgery group was significantly greater than that in the FGG group (0 ± 0.4 mm) at 48 months. In the delayed FGG group, reduced MR and no significant differences in CBL were observed compared with the pre-graft measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

FGGs can be a practical treatment option to maintain CBL around implants with limited KM.

Dental Implants with Different Neck Design: A Prospective Clinical Comparative Study with 2-Year Follow-Up

The present study was conducted to investigate whether a different implant neck design could affect survival rate and peri-implant tissue health in a cohort of disease-free partially edentulous patients in the molar–premolar region. The investigation was conducted on 122 dental implants inserted in 97 patients divided into two groups: Group A (rough wide-neck implants) vs. Group B (rough reduced-neck implants). All patients were monitored through clinical and radiological checkups. Survival rate, probing depth, and marginal bone loss were assessed at 12- and 24-month follow-ups. Patients assigned to Group A received 59 implants, while patients assigned to Group B 63. Dental implants were placed by following a delayed loading protocol, and cemented metal–ceramic crowns were delivered to the patients. The survival rates for both Group A and B were acceptable and similar at the two-year follow-up (96.61% vs. 95.82%). Probing depth and marginal bone loss tended to increase over time (follow-up: t₁ = 12 vs. t₂ = 24 months) in both groups of patients. Probing depth (p = 0.015) and bone loss (p = 0.001) were significantly lower in Group A (3.01 vs. 3.23 mm and 0.92 vs. 1.06 mm; Group A vs. Group B). Within the limitations of the present study, patients with rough wide-neck implants showed less marginal bone loss and minor probing depth, as compared to rough reduced-neck implants placed in the molar–premolar region. These results might be further replicated through longer-term trials, as well as comparisons between more collar configurations (e.g., straight vs. reduced vs. wide collars).

Evaluation of the relationship between Periotest values, marginal bone loss, and stability of single dental implants: A 3-year prospective study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Although the Periotest has been shown to provide reliable information about initial implant stability, whether Periotest values (PTVs) can be correlated with the stability of implants in function for several years is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to investigate implant stability by using PTVs, as well as changes in stability and peri-implant marginal bone levels (as measured by radiographs) over a 3-year follow-up period. The exploratory hypothesis was that there is a significant correlation between PTVs and bone loss around the implant and that PTVs can provide predictive information about marginal bone-level changes and implant stability over time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study population included patients who needed single-tooth replacement with restoration of cemented fixed partial dentures. Clinical data, PTVs, and periapical radiographs were collected at the time points of implant placement, 3 to 6 months after insertion, and 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after the final definitive prosthetic restoration. Pearson correlation coefficient tests were performed to estimate the correlation between the PTVs received at the first follow-up time point and the subsequent PTVs received during the follow-up period (up to 3 years after the restoration). The Pearson test was applied, as well as the t test and repeated-measures ANOVA, to evaluate PTVs and bone loss changes over time. The Pearson test was also applied to estimate the correlation between the bone loss values measured at the first follow-up visit and the subsequent bone loss values at the annual follow-up time points (up to and including 3 years after the restoration).

RESULTS

A total of 43 implants were inserted in 34 patients (26 men and 8 women); the average patient age was 52.8 years. A significant reduction in implant stability was detected between implant insertion and the 3- to 6-month follow-up time point, which was then followed by a significant increase in stability at the 1-year follow-up time point and then stabilized during the 2- and 3-year follow-up time points (P<.014). Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between PTVs at the 1-year follow-up and the PTVs at all measured follow-up time points (P<.05). A positive correlation was obtained with high-strength correlation coefficient R (R>0.7) at all follow-up time points. Bone loss changes during the follow-up time points were significantly different and correlated with PTVs (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Periotest is a reliable device for assessing implant stability and providing predictive information about marginal bone level changes around an implant.

Influence on peri-implant bone loss of different fixed partial dentures retained on 2 implants

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Marginal bone loss is key to determining the success of dental implants. However, how different factors, including the extension or span of implant-supported restorations and implant position, affect bone loss is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to analyze peri-implant bone loss 3 years after loading by evaluating the influence of implant position and prosthetic type and comparing splinted crowns and 3- or 4-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) to determine whether 2 dental implants can achieve comparable success when replacing 2, 3, or 4 missing teeth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-two adjacent dental implants in 23 participants were investigated. The implants supported noncantilevered restorations: 2 splinted crowns or 3- or 4-unit FPDs. Bone loss was evaluated 3 years after loading from periapical radiographs using AutoCAD software. Nonparametric comparisons were made. The Wilcoxon test was applied to determine homogeneity of related samples. The Mann-Whitney test was applied to measure homogeneity of bone loss in 2 independent samples and the presence/absence of a pontic in the restoration (α=.05).

RESULTS

Mean ±standard deviation peri-implant bone loss was 0.9 ±0.7 mm. The peri-implant bone loss of the restorations analyzed was similar to the average values of 1.1 ±0.8 mm for 3- and 4-unit FPDs and 0.8 ±0.6 mm for splinted crowns. The type of prosthodontic restoration and implant position did not show significant influences on bone loss (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mean bone loss values were within an acceptable range. Statistically significant relationships were not found between the restoration types, suggesting that 3 or 4 missing teeth can be replaced by 2 implants. Further studies with longer follow-ups are needed to obtain clinically applicable conclusions.

[Criteria for success in dental implants]

With the comprehensive application and development of implant dentistry in recent years, multi-institutional data have supported a large number of clinical research findings. A consensus was gradually reached on the evaluation of the state and effect of implants and types of indicators that were selected after restoration. This study aims to examine the frequently used criteria to define treatment success in implant dentistry.

Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The decision to splint or to restore independently generally occurs during the planning stage, when the advantages and disadvantages of each clinical situation are considered based on the proposed treatment. However, clinical evidence to help clinicians make this decision is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the marginal bone loss, implant survival rate, and prosthetic complications of splinted and nonsplinted implant restorations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was designed according to the Cochrane criteria for elaborating a systematic review and meta-analysis and adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Also, this review was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42017080162). An electronic search in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted up to November 2017. A specific clinical question was structured according to the population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) approach. The addressed focused question was "Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted?" The meta-analysis was based on the Mantel-Haenszel and inverse variance methods to assess the marginal bone loss, implant survival, and prosthetic complications of splinted and nonsplinted implant restorations.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were selected for qualitative and quantitative analyses. A total of 4215 implants were placed in 2185 patients (splinted, 2768; nonsplinted, 1447); the mean follow-up was 87.8 months (range=12-264 months). Quantitative analysis found no significant differences between splinted and nonsplinted restorations for marginal bone loss. The assessed studies reported that 75 implants failed (3.4%), of which 24 were splinted (99.1% of survival rate) and 51 were nonsplinted (96.5% of survival rate). Quantitative analysis of all studies showed statistically significant higher survival rates for splinted restorations than for nonsplinted restorations. Ceramic chipping, screw loosening, abutment screw breakage, and soft tissue inflammation were reported in the selected studies. The quantitative analysis found no statistically significant difference in the prosthetic complications of splinted and nonsplinted restorations.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this systematic review and meta-analysis, it was concluded that there was no difference in the marginal bone loss and prosthetic complications of splinted and nonsplinted implant restorations; this is especially true for restorations in the posterior region. However, splinted restorations were associated with decreased implant failure.

An overview of application of silver nanoparticles for biomaterials in dentistry

Oral cavity is a gateway to the entire body and protection of this gateway is a major goal in dentistry. Plaque biofilm is a major cause of majority of dental diseases and although various biomaterials have been applied for their cure, limitations pertaining to the material properties prevent achievement of desired outcomes. Nanoparticle applications have become useful tools for various dental applications in endodontics, periodontics, restorative dentistry, orthodontics and oral cancers. Off these, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been used in medicine and dentistry due to its antimicrobial properties. AgNPs have been incorporated into biomaterials in order to prevent or reduce biofilm formation. Due to greater surface to volume ratio and small particle size, they possess excellent antimicrobial action without affecting the mechanical properties of the material. This unique property of AgNPs makes these materials as fillers of choice in different biomaterials whereby they play a vital role in improving the properties. This review aims to discuss the influence of addition of AgNPs to various biomaterials used in different dental applications.

Use of Silver Nanoparticles Reduces Internal Contamination of External Hexagon Implants by Candida albicans

Since the dental implant/abutment interface cannot totally seal the passage of microorganisms, the interior of implant becomes a reservoir of pathogenic microorganisms that produce and maintain chronic inflammation in the tissues around implants. Silver nanoparticles (nano-Ag) are potent and broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of the nano-Ag to prevent the contamination of the implant internal surface by Candida albicans, caused by the implant/abutment microgap infiltration. Thirty-six implants were used in this experiment. Three study groups were performed: experimental group (implants receiving an application of nano-Ag in their inner cavity before installation of the abutment); positive-control group (implants receiving sterile phosphate buffer saline application instead of nano-Ag) and negative-control group (implants receiving the application of nano-Ag in the inner cavity and immersed in a sterile medium). In the positive-control and experimental groups, the implants were immersed in a Candida albicans suspension. The abutments of all three groups were screwed with a 10 N torque. After 72 h of immersion inC. albicans suspension or sterile medium, the abutments were removed and the inner surface of the implants was sampled with absorbent paper cone for fungal detection. No C. albicans contamination was observed in the negative-control group. The positive-control group showed statistically higher values of colony forming units (CFUs) of C. albicans compared with the experimental group. In conclusion, silver nanoparticles reduced C. albicans colonization inside the implants, even with low torque screw abutment.

Long-Term Effect of Surface Roughness and Patients' Factors on Crestal Bone Loss at Dental Implants. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Publications from 2011 to 2015 were selected to evaluate effect of implant surface roughness on long-term bone loss as surrogate for peri-implantitis risk. 87 out of 2,566 papers reported the mean bone loss after at least 5 years of function. Estimation of the proportion of implants with bone loss above 1, 2, and 3 mm as well as analysis the effect of implant surface roughness, smoking, and history of periodontitis was performed. By means of the provided statistical information of bone loss (mean and standard deviation) the prevalence of implants with bone loss ranging from 1 to 3 mm was estimated. The bone loss was used as a surrogate parameter for "peri-implantitis" given the fact that "peri-implantitis" prevalence was not reported in most studies or when reported, the diagnostic criteria were unclear or of dubious quality. The outcome of this review suggests that peri-implant bone loss around minimally rough implant systems was statistically significant less in comparison to the moderately rough and rough implant systems. No statistically significant difference was observed between moderately rough and rough implant systems. The studies that compared implants with comparable design and different surface roughness, showed less average peri-implant bone loss around the less rough surfaces in the meta-analysis. However, due to the heterogeneity of the papers and the multifactorial cause for bone loss, the impact of surface roughness alone seems rather limited and of minimal clinical importance. Irrespective of surface topography or implant brand, the average weighted implant survival rate was 97.3% after 5 years or more of loading. If considering 3 mm bone loss after at least 5 years to represent the presence of "peri-implantitis," less than 5% of the implants were affected. The meta-analysis indicated that periodontal history and smoking habits yielded more bone loss.

Factors affecting peri-implant bone resorption in four Implant supported mandibular full-arch restorations: a 3-year prospective study

BACKGROUND

Peri-implant marginal bone-level (MBL) alteration represents one of the parameters included in the criteria for determining implant health.

OBJECTIVE

Factors affecting peri-implant MBL alteration for 4-implant-supported fixed mandibular prostheses (4-ISFMP) were assessed.

MATERIAL & METHODS

A 3-year prospective, cohort study was conducted on 44 mandibularly edentulous patients treated with 4-ISFMP. Peri-implant MBL alteration was evaluated radiographically at the 12-, 24- and 36-month follow-ups considering to patient-related risk factors [age, gender, diabetes mellitus, smoking, cardiovascular disease (CVD), rheumatic disorders (RD)] and implant/prosthesis-related features (implant location, keratinized gingiva, denture cantilever length, prosthesis supporting zone, opposing dentition) as well as to peri-implant biological parameters (plaque-, bleeding-, calculus index).

RESULTS

148/176 implants (37 patients, drop-out: 15%) were followed for 3 years showing significant (p < 0.001) annual differences of MBL alterations over time. The univariate analysis demonstrated differences of MBL alterations for smokers (p = 0.014), for patients with CVD (p = 0.001) and RD (p = 0.011). In the 3-year multivariate analysis, MBL alteration was influenced by time (p < 0.001) and showed relationship with risk factors as smoking (p < 0.002; OR = 18.965), CVD (p < 0.021; OR = 5.172), RD (p < 0.006; OR = 50.171) and plaque-index (p = 0.034; OR = 3.252).

CONCLUSIONS

Although peri-implant MBL alteration increased annually, significant odds ratios, were found for patients-related risk factors identifying them potentiating the alterations.