Comparison of treatment outcomes after transoral robotic surgery and supraglottic partial laryngectomy: our experience with seventeen and seventeen patients respectively

Functional and oncological outcomes of transoral laser versus robotic surgery in supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the surgical, functional and oncological outcomes of Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) and Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) for the treatment of supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series with prospective data.

SETTINGS

Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

METHODS

A chart-review analysis, with prospective follow-up was performed on 122 patients treated for a supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma with either TLM or TORS between 2003 and 2019. Patients were grouped according to the surgical technique used. Clinical, surgical, functional and oncological outcomes were compared, including local and regional controls, DFS, and OS, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients, including 47 treated with TLM and 75 with TORS. Negative margins were observed in n = 12/47 (25.5 %) of TLM cases and n = 4/75 (5.3 %) of TORS cases (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of 5-year local and regional control, however a significant difference was found in disease-free survival and overall survival. The functional laryngeal preservation rate was 97.8 % in the TLM group and 100 % in the TORS group.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques appear to be safe and effective, though TORS shows superiority in achieving negative margins compared to TLM. Therefore, the choice of technique should be tailored to available resources, surgical team preferences, and experience, while also considering the learning curves associated with each approach.

Expert perspectives for transoral robotic versus laser surgery for supraglottic carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

To assess the opinion, practices, and challenges of international key opinion leaders about two minimal invasive surgical techniques in supraglottic laryngeal tumours: transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and the transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

METHODS

Design of a questionnaire composed of seven sections and fifty questions covering descriptive data of participants, practitioners experience procedural sequences, considerations related to airways, feeding, and voice, intraoperative haemorrhage, postoperative management, and a comparative analysis of TLM and TORS in treating supraglottic laryngeal cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 27 head and neck surgeons replied to the survey. The experts had an average experience in laryngeal surgery of 20.0 ± 9.4 years, ranging from 5 to 36 years. We noted a significantly shorter installation time in TLM compared to TORS (19% of experts estimated the installation time of over 20 min with TLM vs 44% with TORS; p = 0.02). According to complications, the experts considered that bleeding was the major concern with supraglottic laryngeal surgery, especially intraoperative bleeding in TLM (52% in TLM vs 26% in TORS) (p = 0.09) and postoperative bleeding in TORS (56% in TORS vs 44% in TLM).

CONCLUSION

The experts did not identify a clear superiority of one technology (TLM) over the other (TORS). The two techniques seemed equivalent to the experts, except for the control of intraoperative haemostasis and visualisation of the surgical field, where TORS was perceived as superior to TLM.

Surgical, Functional, and oncological outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for cT1-T3 supraglottic laryngeal Cancers: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review investigated the surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of transoral robotic supraglottic laryngectomy (TORS-SGL) for cT1-T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).

METHODS

Two investigators conducted an updated PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library systematic review for studies investigating the surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of TORS-SGL using the PRISMA statements. The bias analysis was conducted with the MINORS.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included, accounting for 896 patients. TORS-SGL was primarily performed for cT1 (39.1 %), cT2 (46.9 %), and some selected cT3 (7.7 %) LSCCs. Surgical margins were positive in 10.8 % of cases. The mean hospital stay was 8.6 days. Hemorrhage (6.3 %), pneumonia (5.5 %), and aspiration (1.7 %) are the primary complications. The surgical margins were positive in 10.6 % of cases. Feeding tubes, temporary tracheotomy, and definitive percutaneous gastrostomy are found in 65.6 %, 19.7 %, and 5.2 % of patients, respectively. The oral diet is restarted after a mean of 7.2 days. The 5-year OS and DFS of TORS-SGL were estimated to be 78.3 %, and 91.7 %, with 5-year local-relapse-free survival and nodal-relapse-free survival of 90.8 %, and 86.6 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The TORS-SGL is a safe, and effective surgical approach for cT1-T3 SGL. The functional and surgical outcomes appear comparable with TOLM-SGL. The oncological outcomes of TORS-SGL could be better than TOLM and open SGLs, but further large cohort-controlled studies are needed to draw reliable conclusions.

Features related to temporary tracheotomy in patients undergoing Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) for supraglottic squamous cell cancer of the larynx: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review is to assess a relation between demographical, clinical and tumoral features and the need for a prophylactic tracheotomy during TORS procedure in patients affected by supraglottic laryngeal cancer.

METHODS

PRISMA 2020 guidelines were applied in this systematic literature review. A computerized search was performed using the Embase/Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane database, for articles published from 2007 to December 2023. A statistical univariate analysis including selected papers with low or intermediate risk of bias was performed.

RESULTS

Through a study selection process 8 full texts were eligible for statistical univariate analysis. The most relevant factor related to a prophylactic tracheotomy was a contextual bilateral cervical nodes dissection, which increased the need for a tracheotomy of about 3 times. Other factors contribute with a minor impact, such as a patients age >60 years at the time of the diagnosis, a cervical lymph node metastasis and a false vocal fold involvement. Each ones increase by 20-70 % the need for a tracheotomy. However, this rate is decreased by about 60 % by the epiglottis involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The prophylactic tracheotomy is considered a temporary protection strategy to achieve a valid recovery after TORS procedure. However, there are no guidelines regarding its routinely use. Only 25 % of patients undergone tracheotomy during TORS to treat supraglottic laryngeal cancer. These preliminary results may add more significant evidence regarding the use of tracheotomy during the TORS procedure, in order possibly to help the surgeon decide preoperatively whether to perform it or not.

Transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic cancer. A review of oncological and functional outcomes compared to open surgery

Objective

Supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) represents a major surgical challenge in organ-preserving treatment. Type I open partial horizontal laryngectomy (OPHL I) is considered the most popular. To date, minimally-invasive approaches such as laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) have gained increasing relevance. The aim of this narrative review is to obtain a descriptive comparison of functional and oncological outcomes from studies on patients with supraglottic SCC treated with OPHL I and TORS, respectively.

Material and methods

A computerised search was performed using the Pubmed database for articles published from 2000 to 2023. A comparative analysis on functional and oncological outcomes of patients treated by TORS and OPHL I was performed.

Results

The present narrative review shows a superiority of TORS compared to open surgery for supraglottic SCC in terms of functional outcomes, while maintaining comparable oncological outcomes.

Conclusions

Although recently introduced in the treatment of laryngeal pathology, TORS has been shown to be a reliable technique not only for functional but also for oncological outcomes, ensuring good overall survival, disease-free survival, and disease control rates comparable to OPHL I.

Oncological and functional outcomes for transoral robotic surgery following previous radiation treatment for upper aerodigestive tract head and neck cancers. A French multicenter GETTEC group study

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) opens new perspectives. We evaluated the outcomes for patients having undergone TORS after previous radiotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study (n = 138) in a previously irradiated area between 2009 and 2020. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using a chi-squared test, Fisher's test, or Wilcoxon's test.

RESULTS

The median length of hospital stay was 12.5 days. Bleeding was the most frequent postoperative complication (15.2%, n = 22). Prophylactic vessel ligation did not significantly decrease bleeding. Complications were significantly lower for Tis, T1, and N0 tumors. 91.6% (n = 120) of the patients with a perioperative tracheotomy could be decannulated. Larynx was functional for 65.94% of the patients. The median length of follow-up was 26 months. The 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were respectively 59.9% and 43.4%.

CONCLUSION

Oncological and functional results confirmed the value of TORS as a treatment in previously irradiated area.

Transoral robotic supraglottic laryngectomy: Long-term functional and oncologic outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive transoral organ preservation surgeries are being increasingly used for supraglottic tumors. This study investigates the long-term functional and oncologic outcomes of transoral robotic supraglottic laryngectomy (TORS-SGL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with supraglottic laryngeal cancer who underwent TORS-SGL between 2012 and 2015 at a tertiary referral hospital were retrospectively analyzed with at least 5 years of follow-up. The head and neck tumor council and the multidisciplinary oncological board decided whether the patients were suitable for robotic surgery, and the necessity of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Inclusion criteria was histopathological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with T1-T3 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 48.8 months. Local control was 94.4 % at 2 years and 85.9 % at 5 years. Disease-free survival and overall survival were 85.7 % and 81 % at 2 years and 69.3 % and 57.1 % at 5 years, respectively. There was no permanent tracheostomy or prolonged swallowing dysfunction among patients. Age, perineural and lymphovascular invasion were found to be risk factors affecting overall survival.

CONCLUSION

TORS-SGL is a feasible, safe and reliable approach with excellent functional results for T1, T2, and selected T3 supraglottic tumors, providing acceptable long-term oncologic results when compared to alternative treatment modalities.

Role of transoral robotic surgery in surgical treatment of early-stage supraglottic larynx carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There are several options for primary surgical treatment of early-stage supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), including transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of TORS to open partial laryngectomy and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM).

METHODS

Patients with clinical classification T1-2 supraglottic SCC diagnosed 2010-2019, treated with TORS, open partial laryngectomy, or TLM in the National Cancer Database were selected.

RESULTS

One thousand six hundred three patients were included: 17% TORS, 26.5% TLM, 56.5% open. TORS patients had the lowest rates of adjuvant treatment (28.4% vs. TLM: 45.0%, open: 38.5%, p < 0.001), and lower positive margin rates than TLM (16.9% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001). Thirty-day and ninety-day post-operative mortality did not differ between the approaches. Five-year survival was higher following TORS compared to open surgery (77.8% vs. 66.1%, p = 0.01); this difference persisted following matched-pair analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

TORS may be a safe and effective surgical approach for early-stage supraglottic SCC in appropriate patients.

Presentation and outcomes of patients with clinically T1-2, N0 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: The role of definitive radiotherapy compared to primary partial laryngectomy

BACKGROUND

Early-stage supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is usually treated with a single modality. The aim of this study is to examine the role of radiotherapy (RT) versus partial laryngectomy (open, robotic-assisted, or endoscopic) with elective neck dissection (PL + END).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database, 2010-2016. The study population included adult patients with clinically T1-2, N0 supraglottic SCC.

RESULTS

3301 patients were included. RT was performed in 93.52%, open PL + END in 2.64%, robotic-assisted PL + END in 1.33%, and endoscopic surgical resection in 2.51%. In the surgery group, T was upstaged in 23.36% and N was upstage in 16.36%. Five-year survival in the primary surgery group compared to RT group was 61.89% versus 77.46% (HR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.43, 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

T was upstaged in 23% of surgical patients. This accurate staging is likely missed in patients who undergo RT and possibly contributes to lower overall survival of this treatment group.

Nutritional outcomes in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers compared to conventional open surgery. A systematic review

This systematic review examined nutritional outcomes in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS), compared to open surgery (OS) for head and neck cancer. PUBMED, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed. Target nutritional outcomes included: weight, nutritional status, use of enteral feeding, swallowing function/ability, and time to oral diet. Risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias in non-randomized studies tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). Eight studies were included (total n = 608). Compared to OS, TORS probably reduces short- and long-term enteral feeding use or duration (GRADE "moderate" certainty), may reduce time to full swallow ability (GRADE "low" certainty), but it remains uncertain whether TORS reduces long-term patient reported swallowing function or time to oral feeding (GRADE "very-low" certainty). No studies examined nutritional status or weight. There is limited body of evidence examining nutrition outcomes following TORS. Further studies are warranted, which may improve the certainty of evidence and assist in determining the optimal nutrition care for these patients.

Prognostic Features in Intermediate-Size Supraglottic Tumors Treated With Open Supraglottic Laryngectomy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

We investigated growth patterns and pathological features in intermediate-size laryngeal carcinoma amenable to supraglottic laryngectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent an open partial horizontal laryngectomy (OPHL) type I. We analyzed pathological data, tumor sizes, overall survival, disease-specific survival, local control, and laryngeal preservation. Results were stratified between three groups: group I comprised patients with endolaryngeal carcinoma, group II comprised patients with anterior epilaryngeal carcinoma who underwent an OPHL type I + base of tongue (BOT), group III comprised patients with lateral epilaryngeal carcinoma who underwent an OPHL type I + pyriform sinus (PIR).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were analyzed. The 5-year rates of overall survival, disease-specific survival, local control, and laryngeal preservation were 68.4%, 83.7%, 91.6%, and 98.3%, respectively. The tumor sizes at pathological examination were similar between the three groups (mean 27 mm, P = .80) and were associated with pathological features, notably pre-epiglottic space (PES) invasion (24.9 mm vs. 32.2 mm, P = .01), occult invaded lymph nodes (22.6 mm vs. 29.9 mm, P = .03), and trends for margins status (26.5 mm vs. 29.3 mm, P = .45). The risks of PES invasion, occult lymph nodes, and positive margins, respectively, predominated in group I (41.7%), group II (56.3%), and group III (23.3%).

CONCLUSION

In intermediate-size tumors amenable to supraglottic laryngectomy, pathological features are associated with tumor size according to group stratification based on tumor location.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1980-E1986, 2021.

[Transoral resection of supraglottic laryngeal tumors with the Flex Robotic System]

The Flex Robotic System (Medrobotics, Raynham, MA, USA) allows flexible transoral endoscopic resection of head and neck tumors. The current article presents functional and first oncologic experiences with flexible transoral robot-assisted surgery for resection of supraglottic laryngeal tumors. From July 2014 to February 2020, supraglottic cancers in 32 patients (T1 = 11, T2 = 20, T3 = 1) were resected using the Flex Robotic System in the authors' clinic. Within a prospective clinical study, the feasibility, complications, and oncologic results were assessed. Tumors could be exposed, visualized, and successfully resected in all patients. In difficult-to-reach anatomic regions such as the aryepiglottic fold or petiole, the system provided a very good surgical overview. No serious adverse events occurred. Overall survival and local tumor control after 2 years were 88 and 94%, respectively. In conclusion, supraglottic tumors in difficult-to-reach areas have been successfully resected using the Flex Robotic System, with excellent local tumor control.

Losing One's Voice to Save One's Life: A Brief History of Laryngectomy

Laryngectomy is a surgical procedure that involves the surgical removal of the laryngeal complex, thereby separating the upper from the lower respiratory tracts, resulting in a tracheostomy. In this way, respiration is achieved at the expense of the patient’s voice. A neopharynx is formed, serving only as a digestive passage between the mouth and the esophagus. Until the introduction of the procedure, patients with laryngeal cancer were considered terminally ill. Most often, the title of “First recorded laryngectomy” is held by Theodor Billroth in 1873; however, the outcome of the operation itself was doubtful, with later attempts having a 50% mortality rate. The first major leap in reducing patient mortality rates was the introduction of the two-step laryngectomy, performed by Themistocles Gluck in 1881. This achievement, along with the general advancements in the field of surgery at the time allowed his student Johannes Sørensen to perfect the method and further develop it into a modified single-stage laryngectomy. This procedure is the basis of contemporary methods.

The Flex robotic system compared to transoral laser microsurgery for the resection of supraglottic carcinomas: first results and preliminary oncologic outcomes

PURPOSE

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has the potential to improve some inherent disadvantages of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). Here, we retrospectively assessed the application of the Medrobotics Flex system for the resection of supraglottic carcinomas compared to TLM.

METHODS

84 patients underwent surgery for supraglottic carcinomas with the Flex robotic system (n = 19, T-stage distribution in %: T1 42, T2 47, T3 11, T4 0) or TLM (n = 65, T-stage distribution in %: T1 40, T2 44, T3 14, T4 2). Clinical and oncologic parameters were compared.

RESULTS

All surgeries were successfully completed with the Flex system and tracheostomy rate was 13%. For patients with adequate follow-up, 24-month disease-free survival was 71.4% (n = 5/7) after TORS compared to 64.9% (n = 24/37) after TLM. Local recurrence rates were 0% for TORS and 11% for TLM.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial results for supraglottic carcinoma resection using the Medrobotics Flex system are encouraging with excellent local tumor control.

Robotic compared with open operations for cancers of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To compare the effectiveness and safety of robotic surgery with that of open operations for patients with cancers of the head and neck we made an electronic search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, CBM, Opengray and Sciencepaper Online databases, and then made a manual search of specific online databases and the reference lists of relevant papers. Our most recent searches were made on 18 July 2018, and we included randomised controlled trials (RCT), case-control studies, cohort studies, and cross-sectional surveys in which robotic was compared with open surgery for cancer of the head and neck. Data from all the studies included were extracted by two independent workers. The risk ratio was chosen to measure dichotomous effects of treatment for prospective studies including RCT or cohort studies, while the odds ratio was chosen for case-control or cross-sectional studies. The weighted mean difference or standard mean difference was chosen to summarise continuous effects. A random-effects model was used for all data analyses. Thirteen studies were included: one RCT, nine cohort studies, and three cross-sectional studies. Robotic surgery was associated with fewer invaded resection margins, lower recurrence, less need for intraoperative tracheostomy, and less need and shorter duration of postoperative nasal feeding than open operations. Robotic surgery is a safe and feasible approach with remarkable superiority over open surgery for the treatment of cancers of the head and neck.

Meta-analytic comparison of robotic and transoral laser surgical procedures in supraglottic carcinoma

Objective

To assess published reports of oncological surgical success rates in patients who underwent transoral laser supraglottic surgery and robotic surgery for supraglottic cancer.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted and a meta-analysis of published data was performed. PubMed, Sage, Medline and Cochrane data sources were investigated. Overall survival rates, disease-specific survival rates, additional treatments and recurrence rates were investigated to determine the success of the surgical procedures.

Results

The meta-analysis included 24 studies; 1617 studies were excluded. There were no statistically significant differences between the transoral laser supraglottic surgery and transoral robotic supraglottic surgery groups in terms of overall survival (77.0 per cent and 82.4 per cent respectively) and disease-specific survival (75.8 per cent and 87.0 per cent respectively). There was recurrence in 164 out of 832 patients (19.7 per cent) in the transoral laser supraglottic surgery group and in only 6 out of 66 patients (9 per cent) in the transoral robotic supraglottic surgery group.

Conclusion

Transoral laser surgery and robotic surgery appear to have comparable and acceptable oncological success rates.

Transoral robotic excision of laryngocele: Surgical considerations

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has emerged as a novel, safe, and feasible procedure for the resection of malignant supraglottic laryngeal cancers. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the surgical technique with extension of the use of TORS to excise a laryngeal cyst.

RESULTS

Laryngeal cyst resection, along with its tract, was accomplished with preservation of both false and true vocal cords. There was no perioperative or early postoperative complications. The patient was extubated immediately after surgery. Oral diet was initiated within 24 hours. No tracheostomy was required. A video demonstration of the surgical technique is included on Head & Neck's website.

CONCLUSION

TORS is a safe and feasible procedure for excision of selected laryngeal cysts.

Functional outcomes in early (T1/T2) supraglottic cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Organ preserving surgery (OPS) and radiotherapy (RT) are both accepted treatment options for early stage supraglottic cancer (SGC). Radiation has supplanted surgery in most cases, because of the perception that surgery results in poorer functional outcomes. However, evidence suggests that OPS with a neck dissection may be associated with improved survival. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to compare functional outcomes of OPS and RT for early SGC.

METHODS

We searched Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies. Studies were included if they reported functional outcomes on 10 or more patients with early stage SGC treated with radiation or OPS, including open partial laryngectomy, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) or transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Two reviewers independently screened articles for relevance using pre-determined criteria.

RESULTS

From 7720 references, we included 10 articles (n = 640 patients). 50% (n = 320) of patients were treated with surgery. Three head-to-head RT versus OPS papers were included, however different outcome measures were used for each group. Intractable aspiration management (including total laryngectomy or permanent tracheostomy) following OPS was reported in five papers representing 186 patients; the definitive intractable aspiration management rate was 2.6% (95% CI 1.0-6.8%). Four papers reported permanent G-tube rate for the surgical group (n = 198), calculating a rate of 5.3% (95% CI 2.6-10.5%), this was not reported for the RT group in any papers. One study reported quality of life. Two studies reported objective voice measures.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review revealed a paucity of objective measures and significant data heterogeneity, rendering the comparison of functional outcomes following OPS versus RT for early SGC limited. Future research should include objective measures of functional outcomes including laryngectomy rate, g-tube rate, tracheostomy dependence, quality of life, and voice quality measures.

Comparison of functional and oncological treatment outcomes after transoral robotic surgery and open surgery for supraglottic laryngeal cancer

Objective

To compare functional and oncological treatment outcomes among patients with supraglottic laryngeal cancers who underwent transoral robotic supraglottic laryngectomy and open supraglottic laryngectomy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 17 patients treated by transoral robotic supraglottic laryngectomy and 20 patients treated by open supraglottic laryngectomy.

Results

No tracheostomy or prolonged intubation was needed in the transoral robotic surgery group. Furthermore, that group had a shorter oral feeding time, hospitalisation and recovery period. There was no difference between groups in terms of complications. There were no differences in overall survival time and disease-specific survival time between groups.

Conclusion

Transoral robotic supraglottic laryngectomy for supraglottic laryngeal cancer is an oncologically safe and functional procedure with better results when compared to conventional open surgery.

A Contemporary Review of Evidence for Transoral Robotic Surgery in Laryngeal Cancer

Numerous studies have shown that transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancers is safe and that it yields satisfactory functional and oncological outcomes. For many teams worldwide, it is therefore a standard surgical approach with eligible patients. In the same time, TORS is increasingly being used and described in the context of laryngeal cancer surgery. It is proposed as an alternative to open approaches, which may yield inconsistent functional results and significant rates of postoperative complications. It may also be an alternative to definitive radiotherapy, which entails significant early and late toxicities. Moreover, it has been explored as an alternative to endoscopic laser surgery in patients with difficult exposure, even though there is still a lack of evidence about which procedure provides better vizualization of the vocal cords. This article provides a review of the indications for TORS in laryngeal cancer, the peri-operative morbidity, functional outcomes, and oncological results.

[Robotic Surgery - Who is The Boss?]

In the head and neck region, great potential is seen in robot-assisted surgery (RAS). Mainly in cancer surgery, the use of robotic systems seems to be of interest. Until today, two robotic systems (DaVinci® und FLEX®) have gained approval for clinical use in the head and neck region, and multiple other systems are currently in pre-clinical testing. Although, certain groups of patients may benefit from RAS, no unbiased randomized clinical studies are available. Until today, it was not possible to satisfactorily prove any advantage of RAS as compared to standard procedures. The limited clinical benefit and the additional financial burden seem to be the main reasons, why the comprehensive application of RAS has not been realized so far.This review article describes the large variety of clinical applications for RAS in the head and neck region. In addition, the financial and technical challenges, as well as ongoing developments of RAS are highlighted. Special focus is put on risks associated with RAS and current clinical studies. We believe, that RAS will find its way into clinical routine during the next years. Therefore, medical staff will have to increasingly face the technical, scientific and ethical features of RAS.

Treatment of early stage Supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: meta-analysis comparing primary surgery versus primary radiotherapy

Objectives

For early stage supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), single modality treatment either in the form of primary organ preservation surgery alone or radiation alone is recommended. Thus, a definite treatment strategy for early stage supraglottic SCC remains undefined. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the oncologic outcomes of surgery and radiotherapy in early stage (Stage I and II) T1 N0 and T2 N0 supraglottic SCC.

Methods

Systematic methods were used to identify published and unpublished data. Two reviewers independently screened all titles, abstracts and articles for relevance using predefined criteria. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results

Five studies met the inclusion criteria for disease specific mortality with a total of 2864 pooled patients. 5-year disease specific mortality was lower in the surgery group (ORs 0.43, 95% CI 0.31–0.60). Four studies met the inclusion criteria for 5-year overall mortality with a total of 2790 pooled patients. Five-year overall mortality was lower in surgery group (ORs 0.40, 95% CI 0.29–0.55).

Conclusions

This is the first study to examine the management of early stage supraglottic SCC using meta-analytic methodology. Our results suggest that primary surgery may result in decreased disease specific and overall mortality compared to primary radiotherapy.

Is There a Role for Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?

OPINION STATEMENT

Given the potential for long-term toxicities from concurrent chemoradiation, there is great interest in surgery as a primary treatment modality for head and neck cancers, particularly in the younger HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patient. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has proven to be an effective technique to safely treat oropharyngeal and select supraglottic tumors surgically. Sound, traditional surgical principles are employed using improved endoscopic visualization and precise instrumentation to perform oncologic surgery without the morbidity of transmandibular or transcervical approaches. Although level 1 evidence prospective clinical trials are currently underway for TORS, the literature supports its safety and efficacy based on numerous studies. Currently, prospective randomized trials are underway to provide better evidence for or against TORS in oropharyngeal cancer. Patient selection based on comorbidities, anatomy, and available pathological data is critical in choosing patients for TORS.

Robotic surgical systems in maxillofacial surgery: a review

Throughout the twenty-first century, robotic surgery has been used in multiple oral surgical procedures for the treatment of head and neck tumors and non-malignant diseases. With the assistance of robotic surgical systems, maxillofacial surgery is performed with less blood loss, fewer complications, shorter hospitalization and better cosmetic results than standard open surgery. However, the application of robotic surgery techniques to the treatment of head and neck diseases remains in an experimental stage, and the long-lasting effects on surgical morbidity, oncologic control and quality of life are yet to be established. More well-designed studies are needed before this approach can be recommended as a standard treatment paradigm. Nonetheless, robotic surgical systems will inevitably be extended to maxillofacial surgery. This article reviews the current clinical applications of robotic surgery in the head and neck region and highlights the benefits and limitations of current robotic surgical systems.

Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery

Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.

Clinical outcomes with transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of a French evaluation cooperative subgroup of GETTEC

BACKGROUND

Transoral, minimally invasive, organ preservation surgeries are increasingly used to treat laryngopharyngeal carcinomas to avoid the toxicity associated with combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens. This study investigated the efficiency, safety, and functional outcomes of using transoral robotic surgery (TORS) to perform supraglottic laryngectomy (SGL).

METHODS

This was a multicenter study using a case series with planned data collection from 2009 to 2012 for patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) who underwent an SGL using TORS.

RESULTS

Eighty-four of the 262 patients underwent TORS for a supraglottic SCC. Within 24 hours of surgery, 24% of the patients began an oral diet. The median use of a feeding tube was 8 days for 76% of other patients. Definitive percutaneous gastrostomy feeding was necessary for 9.5% of the patients. Twenty-four percent of the patients did require a tracheostomy, and the median use was 8 days. One percent of the patients had a definitive tracheostomy. Aspiration pneumonia was observed in 23% of the patients during the postoperative course, and was responsible for the death of 1 patient. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 18% of the patients. Based on the pathology results, 51% of the patients received adjuvant radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

TORS for SGL, in the intermediate stage of SCC, provides a safe procedure with good functional outcomes and fast recovery times; however, adverse events are possible. Consequently, this technique requires good selection criteria for the patients to reduce the risk of postoperative complications. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1097-E1101, 2016.