Is routine chest X-ray after surgical and percutaneous tracheostomy necessary in adults: a systemic review of the current literature

Utility of chest x-ray for tracheostomy tube placement in pediatric patients

Objective

To evaluate the utility of ordering chest x-rays after pediatric tracheostomy tube placement in identifying acute, post-operative complications and how it impacts clinical decision-making.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified tracheostomies performed in 139 pediatric patients through CPT codes over a 5-year period from 2013 to 2018. Manual chart review was performed for demographic and clinical characteristics, pre-procedure and post-procedure chest x-ray interpretations, and the presence of complications. Each complication was reviewed to see if action was taken due to post-procedure chest x-ray findings. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine associations with changes in pre-procedure versus post-procedure chest x-rays.

Results

In a cohort of 139 pediatric patients with pre-procedure and post-procedure chest x-rays, 40 (28.8%) of patients had new significant post-procedure chest x-ray findings compared to pre-procedure chest x-ray findings. Of these 40 instances of changes in pre-procedure versus post-procedure chest x-ray findings, only eight resulted in action being taken due to the observed findings. Among these eight instances of action being taken, only one instance involved in invasive action being taken with a bronchoscopy. With multivariable regression analysis, patient age, race, gender, and the presences of genetic syndromes, were not found to be significant risk factors in predicting changes in pre-procedure versus post-procedure chest x-ray.

Conclusion

In our study, post-procedure chest x-ray after tracheostomy tube placement did not significantly impact clinical decision making. It may be worth reconsidering the value in routine chest x-rays after tracheostomy tube placement in pediatric patients.

State of the art: percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit

Percutaneous tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and offers many benefits, including decreasing ICU length of stay and need for sedation while improving patient comfort, effective communication, and airway clearance. However, there is no consensus on the optimal timing of tracheostomy in ICU patients. Ultrasound (US) and bronchoscopy are useful adjunct tools to optimize procedural performance. US can be used pre-procedurally to identify vascular structures and to select the optimal puncture site, intra-procedurally to assist with accurate placement of the introducer needle, and post-procedurally to evaluate for a pneumothorax. Bronchoscopy provides real-time visual guidance from within the tracheal lumen and can reduce complications, such as paratracheal puncture and injury to the posterior tracheal wall. A step-by-step detailed procedural guide, including preparation and procedural technique, is provided with a team-based approach. Technical aspects, such as recommended equipment and selection of appropriate tracheostomy tube type and size, are discussed. Certain procedural considerations to minimize the risk of complications should be given in circumstances of patient obesity, coagulopathy, or neurologic illness. Herein, we provide a practical state of the art review of percutaneous tracheostomy in ICU patients. Specifically, we will address pre-procedural preparation, procedural technique, and post-tracheostomy management.

Should pulmonary radiographs be taken routinely following paediatric tracheostomy?

AIM

As the rates of complications related to tracheostomy procedures have fallen in recent years, the routine taking of pulmonary radiographs following tracheostomy has become a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of complications developing in 120 children who had pulmonary radiographs taken following surgical tracheostomy and to thereby evaluate the necessity of routine pulmonary radiographs after tracheostomy.

METHODS

The data were retrospectively reviewed of 120 children who had pulmonary radiographs taken following surgical tracheostomy between January 2012 and January 2018. The pulmonary radiographs taken before and immediately after tracheostomy were evaluated independently by two paediatric radiology specialists and the results were recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence of complications after tracheostomy was determined as 23.3%, and no pneumothorax was determined in any patient. An increase was not seen in the complication incidence in those who had undergone emergency tracheostomy and patients aged < 2 years, which are accepted as high-risk groups. In the evaluation of the pre- and post-tracheostomy radiographs, new findings were determined on the post-tracheostomy radiograph that had not been there previously in eight patients (6.6%). These findings were newly formed infiltration in seven patients (5.8%), and malposition of the tracheostomy tube in one patient (0.8%). No pathology requiring intervention was determined on the radiographs of any patient.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study support the view that it is not necessary to take pulmonary radiographs routinely following tracheostomy in the paediatric age group, including those at higher risk.

Guidelines for Tracheostomy From the Korean Bronchoesophagological Society

The Korean Bronchoesophagological Society appointed a task force to develop a clinical practice guideline for tracheostomy. The task force conducted a systematic search of the Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to key questions. Evidence-based recommendations for practice were ranked according to the American College of Physicians grading system. An external expert review and a Delphi questionnaire were conducted to reach a consensus regarding the recommendations. Accordingly, the committee developed 18 evidence-based recommendations, which are grouped into seven categories. These recommendations are intended to assist clinicians in performing tracheostomy and in the management of tracheostomized patients.

Assessment of scoring systems to describe the position of tracheostomy tubes within the airway - the lunar study

BACKGROUND

Malposition of tracheostomy tubes is difficult to detect at the bedside and may contribute to eventual device misplacement. Endoscopic examination can be undertaken via tracheoscopic (T-view) or trans-laryngeal (L-view) approach, offering more precise detail regarding positioning within the airway. The aims of this study were to evaluate inter-rater agreement between bespoke T and L view scoring systems and subsequently whether T-views could predict L-views.

METHODS

Adult intensive care unit patients with percutaneous or surgical tracheostomies were included and paired T and L-views of their tracheostomy tube within the airway were taken on up to four occasions. Images were later scored by five independent raters using bespoke scoring systems. The primary outcome was to determine the T and L view scoring system with the best inter-rater agreement, defined by weighted kappa and intra-class correlation coefficients. The secondary outcome was to assess agreement between T and L-view scoring systems.

RESULTS

Seventy-one T-views and 43 L-views were obtained from a total of 20 patients. Images were scored by five raters, resulting in 355 T-view scores, 215 L-view scores and 215 paired T and L-view scores for comparison. There was good inter-rater agreement (highest T-view k = 0.84, L-view k = 0.72). There was poor agreement between T and L-view scores for each of the paired images (highest k = 0.25) although extreme-to-extreme misclassification rates remained acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst our data demonstrated good inter-rater agreement between scoring systems, it is not possible to reliably predict the T-view orientation and position of a tracheostomy tube within the airway from the paired L-view.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01356719.

Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of paediatric tracheostomy emergencies

Temporary and permanent tracheostomies are required in children to manage actual or anticipated long-term ventilatory support, to aid secretion management or to manage fixed upper airway obstruction. Tracheostomies may be required from the first few moments of life, with the majority performed in children < 4 years of age. Although similarities with adult tracheostomies are apparent, there are key differences when managing the routine and emergency care of children with tracheostomies. The National Tracheostomy Safety Project identified the need for structured guidelines to aid multidisciplinary clinical decision making during paediatric tracheostomy emergencies. These guidelines describe the development of a bespoke emergency management algorithm and supporting resources. Our aim is to reduce the frequency, nature and severity of paediatric tracheostomy emergencies through preparation and education of staff, parents, carers and patients.

Pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax during emergency tracheotomy under spontaneous ventilation: Macklin meets Müeller?

Potentially serious complications associated to emergency tracheotomy continue being a matter of concern. We review the pathogenesis of gas leakage in this setting and discuss about the possible mechanisms involved in its cause. We present two cases of pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema and pneumothorax in the context of emergency tracheotomy under spontaneous ventilation, finally resolved by chest drainage. The combination of overly negative pleural pressures due to extreme inspiratory efforts in the context of an almost completely obstructed airway together with over-pressurized alveoli because of gaseous entrapment secondary to serious expiratory obstruction appears to be the most plausible primary cause of air leaks in our patients. Understanding the underlying mechanisms evolved in its production will help clinicians to suspect and diagnose this phenomenon.

Tracheostomy in neurologically compromised paediatric patients: role of starplasty

OBJECTIVES

Starplasty tracheostomy is an alternative to traditional tracheostomy. This paper reviews neurologically compromised paediatric patients with tracheostomies and discusses the role of starplasty tracheostomy.

METHOD

A retrospective review was conducted of paediatric patients with a neurological disorder who underwent tracheostomy between 1997 and 2011.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients, with an average age of 7.3 years, were identified. The most common indications for tracheostomy were: ventilator dependence (39.6 per cent), an inability to tolerate secretions or recurrent aspiration pneumonia (33.3 per cent), and upper respiratory obstruction or hypotonia (12.5 per cent). The most common underlying neurological diagnosis was cerebral palsy. There were no early complications. Eighteen (43 per cent) of 42 patients with follow up experienced at least 1 delayed complication. Only 12 patients (28.6 per cent) were decannulated.

CONCLUSION

Patients with primary neurological diagnoses have low rates of decannulation; starplasty tracheostomy should be considered for these patients. Patients with seizure disorder or acute neurological injury tended to have a higher short-term decannulation rate; traditional tracheostomy is recommended in these patients.

Routinely obtained chest X-rays after elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery can be omitted in most patients; a retrospective, observational study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the use of routinely obtained chest X-rays is necessary after elective VATS.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1097 chest X-rays obtained routinely after elective VATS, performed in patients aged over 15 years during an 18-month period. VATS procedures were divided into three groups according to the degree of pulmonary resection. The chest X-rays (obtained anterior-posterior in one plane with the patient in the supine position) were categorized as abnormal if showing pneumothorax >5 cm, possible intra-thoracic bleeding and/or a displaced chest tube. Medical charts were reviewed for all patients with abnormal chest X-rays to see if an intervention was made based on the X-ray. In case of an intervention, detailed clinical data were collected.

RESULTS

44 of 1097 chest X-rays (4.0 %) were abnormal and 10 of these X-rays (0.9 %) led to a clinical intervention. Proportions of abnormal chest X-rays were unequally distributed between groups (p < 0.001), whereas the number of interventions was not (p = 0.43). Of the ten chests X-rays that led to an intervention, three showed possible intra-thoracic bleeding, six showed pneumothorax >5 cm and one showed a kinked chest tube. All the patients with possible intra-thoracic bleeding were re-explored in the operating theatre the same day.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 10 of 1097 chest X-rays (0.9 %) obtained routinely after elective VATS procedures led to a clinical intervention, supporting the abandon of routine chest X rays in favour of a more individualised approach, based on clinical observations.