1
|
Gal A, Gravier-Dumonceau R, Penicaud M, Ebode D, Radulesco T, Michel J. Efficacy of dupilumab in real-life settings: a STROBE study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024:10.1007/s00405-024-08553-9. [PMID: 38498194 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08553-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-4 and IL-13, has demonstrated its efficacy in several clinical trials. However, to date, real-life data remains limited. OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to assess the real-life impact of dupilumab on patients with severe and uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective, monocentric, observational, real-life study, conducted in accordance with the STROBE guidelines. The following parameters were collected before treatment and at 1, 4, and 12 months: Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), nasal polyp score (NPS), Sniffin' Sticks-16 (SST-16), visual analog scale (VAS) for loss of smell, nasal congestion score (NCS), gustatory VAS, asthma control, oral corticosteroid usage, surgery rates, and occurrence of side effects. RESULTS The study included 47 patients. SNOT-22 scores decreased from 52.4 ± 24.3 to 12.7 ± 10.5 at 12 months (p < 0.001). NPS decreased from 6.15 ± 1.71 to 1.57 ± 1.40 at 12 months (p < 0.001). SST-16 scores increased from 1.6 ± 2.83 to 9.1 ± 5.4 at 12 months (p < 0.001). NCS decreased from 2.45 ± 0.72 to 0.38 ± 0.63 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Prior to treatment, 72.3% were using oral corticosteroids, compared to 17.0% at 12 months (p < 0.01). Two patients required additional surgery, and 17% reported completely uncontrolled asthma, compared to 0% at 12 months (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Our real-life results confirm the efficacy of Dupilumab in the treatment of severe and uncontrolled CRSwNP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gal
- APHM, La Conception University Hospital, ENT-HNS, Department, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - R Gravier-Dumonceau
- APHM, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Hop Timone, BioSTIC, Biostatistique et Technologies de l'Information et de La Communication, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - M Penicaud
- APHM, La Conception University Hospital, ENT-HNS, Department, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - D Ebode
- APHM, La Conception University Hospital, ENT-HNS, Department, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - T Radulesco
- Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, IUSTI, La Conception University Hospital, ENT-HNS, Department, Marseille, France, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.
| | - J Michel
- Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, IUSTI, La Conception University Hospital, ENT-HNS, Department, Marseille, France, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Djupesland PG, Reitsma S, Hopkins C, Sedaghat AR, Peters A, Fokkens WJ. Endoscopic grading systems for nasal polyps: are we comparing apples to oranges? Rhinology 2022; 60:169-176. [PMID: 35403178 DOI: 10.4193/rhin21.401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic grading of nasal polyps (NP) is typically a coprimary endpoint in clinical trials evaluating treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, a consensus on the most effective way to grade nasal polyps has not been reached. Different scales have been used, hampering the interpretation of data across trials. This review compares the characteristics of NP grading systems used in registration trials for approved NP treatments. These fundamental differences in grading systems make quantitative comparison of outcomes between trials inaccurate and potentially misleading. In lieu of a universal grading system, reporting the baseline distribution of polyp grades (unilateral and/or summed/total grades), as well as changes from baseline over time by baseline grade may help improve interpretability of outcomes and reduce inaccuracy when attempting cross-trial comparisons and making therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Reitsma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Hopkins
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - A R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - A Peters
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - W J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Orlandi RR, Kingdom TT, Smith TL, Bleier B, DeConde A, Luong AU, Poetker DM, Soler Z, Welch KC, Wise SK, Adappa N, Alt JA, Anselmo-Lima WT, Bachert C, Baroody FM, Batra PS, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Beswick D, Bhattacharyya N, Chandra RK, Chang EH, Chiu A, Chowdhury N, Citardi MJ, Cohen NA, Conley DB, DelGaudio J, Desrosiers M, Douglas R, Eloy JA, Fokkens WJ, Gray ST, Gudis DA, Hamilos DL, Han JK, Harvey R, Hellings P, Holbrook EH, Hopkins C, Hwang P, Javer AR, Jiang RS, Kennedy D, Kern R, Laidlaw T, Lal D, Lane A, Lee HM, Lee JT, Levy JM, Lin SY, Lund V, McMains KC, Metson R, Mullol J, Naclerio R, Oakley G, Otori N, Palmer JN, Parikh SR, Passali D, Patel Z, Peters A, Philpott C, Psaltis AJ, Ramakrishnan VR, Ramanathan M, Roh HJ, Rudmik L, Sacks R, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Sindwani R, Smith K, Snidvongs K, Stewart M, Suh JD, Tan BK, Turner JH, van Drunen CM, Voegels R, Wang DY, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Wright ED, Yan C, Zhang L, Zhou B. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2021; 11:213-739. [PMID: 33236525 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 385] [Impact Index Per Article: 128.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR-RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR-RS-2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence-based findings of the document. METHODS ICAR-RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence-based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. RESULTS ICAR-RS-2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence-based management algorithm is provided. CONCLUSION This ICAR-RS-2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Amber U Luong
- University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX
| | | | - Zachary Soler
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | - Claus Bachert
- Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Sun Yatsen University, Gangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David A Gudis
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel L Hamilos
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Richard Harvey
- University of New South Wales and Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Amin R Javer
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Valerie Lund
- Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Kevin C McMains
- Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, San Antonio, TX
| | | | - Joaquim Mullol
- IDIBAPS Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alkis J Psaltis
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Luke Rudmik
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Raymond Sacks
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - De Yun Wang
- National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Carol Yan
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Luo Zhang
- Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Bing Zhou
- Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coppess S, Padia R, Horn D, Parikh SR, Inglis A, Bly R, Dahl J, Dudley D, Johnson K. Standardizing Laryngeal Cleft Evaluations: Reliability of the Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 160:533-539. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599818806283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective While the Benjamin-Inglis classification system is widely used to categorize laryngeal clefts, it does not clearly differentiate a type 1 cleft from normal anatomy, and there is no widely accepted or validated protocol for systematically evaluating interarytenoid mucosal height. We sought to propose the interarytenoid assessment protocol as a method to standardize the description of the interarytenoid anatomy and to test its reliability. Study Design Retrospective review of endoscopic videos. Setting Pediatric academic center. Subjects and Methods The interarytenoid assessment protocol comprises 4 steps for evaluation of the interarytenoid region relative to known anatomic landmarks in the supraglottis, glottis, and subglottis. Thirty consecutively selected videos of the protocol were reviewed by 4 otolaryngologists. The raters were blinded to identifying information, and the video order was randomized for each review. We assessed protocol completion times and calculated Cohen’s linear-weighted κ coefficient between blinded expert raters and with the operating surgeon to evaluate interrater/intrarater reliability. Results Median age was 4.9 years (59 months; range, 1 month to 20 years). Median completion time was 144 seconds. Interrater and intrarater reliability showed substantial agreement (interrater κ = 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55-0.87]; intrarater mean κ = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.59-0.92/rater 1, 0.47-0.85/rater 2]; P < .001). Comparing raters to the operating surgeon demonstrated substantial agreement (mean κ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31-0.79/rater 1, 0.48-0.89/rater 2; P < .001). Conclusion The interarytenoid assessment protocol appears reliable in describing interarytenoid anatomy. Rapid completion times and substantial interrater/intrarater reliability were demonstrated. Incorporation of this protocol may provide important steps toward improved standardization in the anatomic description of the interarytenoid region in pediatric dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Coppess
- University of Washington School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Reema Padia
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David Horn
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sanjay R. Parikh
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Andrew Inglis
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Randall Bly
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - John Dahl
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Daniel Dudley
- University of Washington School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kaalan Johnson
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|