1
|
Kirchgeorg S, Chang JJM, Ip YCA, Jucker M, Geckeler C, Lüthi M, van der Loo E, Mächler E, Franco-Sierra ND, Herrera MAG, Pellissier L, Deiner K, Desiderato A, Mintchev S. eProbe: Sampling of Environmental DNA within Tree Canopies with Drones. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:16410-16420. [PMID: 39236253 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c05595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a powerful tool for studying biodiversity in forests and tree canopies. However, collecting representative eDNA samples from these high and complex environments remains challenging. Traditional methods, such as surface swabbing or tree rolling, are labor-intensive and require significant effort to achieve adequate coverage. This study proposes a novel approach for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to collect eDNA within tree canopies by using a surface swabbing technique. The method involves lowering a probe from a hovering UAV into the canopy and collecting eDNA as it descends and ascends through branches and leaves. To achieve this, a custom-designed robotic system was developed featuring a winch and a probe for eDNA collection. The design of the probe was optimized, and a control logic for the winch was developed to reduce the risk of entanglement while ensuring sufficient interaction force to facilitate transfer of eDNA onto the probe. The effectiveness of this method was demonstrated during the XPRIZE Rainforest Semi-Finals as 10 eDNA samples were collected from the rainforest canopy, and a total of 152 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) were identified using eDNA metabarcoding. We further investigate how the number of probe interactions with vegetation, the penetration depth, and the sampling duration influence the DNA concentration and community composition of the samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Kirchgeorg
- Environmental Robotics Laboratory, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8092, Switzerland
- Swiss Federale Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf 8903, Switzerland
| | - Jia Jin Marc Chang
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117558, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117377, Singapore
| | - Yin Cheong Aden Ip
- School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
| | - Meret Jucker
- Environmental DNA, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8092, Switzerland
| | - Christian Geckeler
- Environmental Robotics Laboratory, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8092, Switzerland
- Swiss Federale Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf 8903, Switzerland
| | - Martina Lüthi
- Ecosystems and Landscape Evolution, ETH Zürch, Zürich 8092, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Loïc Pellissier
- Swiss Federale Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf 8903, Switzerland
- Ecosystems and Landscape Evolution, ETH Zürch, Zürich 8092, Switzerland
| | - Kristy Deiner
- Environmental DNA, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8092, Switzerland
- SimplexDNA AG, Winterthur 8404, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Desiderato
- Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz 90-136, Poland
| | - Stefano Mintchev
- Environmental Robotics Laboratory, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8092, Switzerland
- Swiss Federale Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf 8903, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jarman S, Alexander JB, Dawkins KL, Lukehurst SS, Nester GM, Wilkinson S, Marnane MJ, McDonald JI, Elsdon TS, Harvey ES. Marine eDNA sampling from submerged surfaces with paint rollers. Mar Genomics 2024; 76:101127. [PMID: 38905943 DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2024.101127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analyses of species present in marine environments is the most effective biological diversity measurement tool currently available. eDNA sampling methods are an intrinsically important part of the eDNA biodiversity analysis process. Identification and development of eDNA sampling methods that are as rapid, affordable, versatile and practical as possible will improve rates of detection of marine species. Optimal outcomes of eDNA biodiversity surveys come from studies employing high levels of sampling replication, so any methods that make sampling faster and cheaper will improve scientific outcomes. eDNA sampling methods that can be applied more widely will also enable sampling from a greater range of marine surface micro-habitats, resulting in detection of a wider range of organisms. In this study, we compared diversity detection by several methods for sampling eDNA from submerged marine surfaces: polyurethane foam, nylon swabs, microfibre paint rollers, and sediment scoops. All of the methods produced a diverse range of species identifications, with >250 multicellular species represented by eDNA at the study site. We found that widely-available small paint rollers were an effective, readily available and affordable method for sampling eDNA from underwater marine surfaces. This approach enables the sampling of marine eDNA using extended poles, or potentially by remotely operated vehicles, where surface sampling by hand is impractical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Jarman
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia; eDNA Frontiers, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
| | - Jason B Alexander
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | | | | | - Georgia M Nester
- Minderoo-UWA Deep Sea Research Centre, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Shaun Wilkinson
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia; Wilderlab, Miramar, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Michael J Marnane
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia; Chevron Technical Center, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Justin I McDonald
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia; Sustainability and Biosecurity, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD), Hillarys, 6025, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Travis S Elsdon
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia; Chevron Technical Center, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Euan S Harvey
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moloney GK, Chaber AL. Where are you hiding the pangolins? screening tools to detect illicit contraband at international borders and their adaptability for illegal wildlife trafficking. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299152. [PMID: 38568991 PMCID: PMC10990205 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The illegal movement of wildlife poses a public health, conservation and biosecurity threat, however there are currently minimal screening tools available at international ports of entry to intercept wildlife trafficking efforts. This review first aimed to explore the screening tools available or under development for the detection of concealed wildlife contraband at international ports, including postal services, airlines, road border crossings and maritime routes. Where evidence was deficient, publications detailing the use of methods to uncover other illicit substances, such as narcotics, weapons, human trafficking, explosives, radioactive materials, or special nuclear material, were compiled and assessed for their applicability to the detection of wildlife. The first search identified only four citations related to the detection of wildlife, however the secondary search revealed 145 publications, including 59 journal articles and 86 conference proceedings, describing screening tools for non-wildlife illicit contraband detection. The screening tools uncovered were analysed for potential fitness for purpose for wildlife contraband detection, to evaluate the feasibility of their implementation and their ease of use. The deficiencies evident in terms of resource availability and research efforts targeting wildlife trafficking highlights a potentially substantial national and international security threat which must be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Kate Moloney
- School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Global One Health Alliance Pty Ltd, West Lakes Shore, SA, Australia
| | - Anne-Lise Chaber
- School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Global One Health Alliance Pty Ltd, West Lakes Shore, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Newton JP, Nevill P, Bateman PW, Campbell MA, Allentoft ME. Spider webs capture environmental DNA from terrestrial vertebrates. iScience 2024; 27:108904. [PMID: 38533454 PMCID: PMC10964257 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Environmental DNA holds significant promise as a non-invasive tool for tracking terrestrial biodiversity. However, in non-homogenous terrestrial environments, the continual exploration of new substrates is crucial. Here we test the hypothesis that spider webs can act as passive biofilters, capturing eDNA from vertebrates present in the local environment. Using a metabarcoding approach, we detected vertebrate eDNA from all analyzed spider webs (N = 49). Spider webs obtained from an Australian woodland locality yielded vertebrate eDNA from 32 different species, including native mammals and birds. In contrast, webs from Perth Zoo, less than 50 km away, yielded eDNA from 61 different vertebrates and produced a highly distinct species composition, largely reflecting exotic species hosted in the zoo. We show that higher animal biomass and proximity to animal enclosures increased eDNA detection probability in the zoo. Our results indicate a tremendous potential for using spider webs as a cost-effective means to monitor terrestrial vertebrates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua P. Newton
- Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
- Minesite Biodiversity Monitoring with eDNA (MBioMe) research group, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Paul Nevill
- Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
- Minesite Biodiversity Monitoring with eDNA (MBioMe) research group, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Philip W. Bateman
- Minesite Biodiversity Monitoring with eDNA (MBioMe) research group, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
- Behavioural Ecology Lab, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Matthew A. Campbell
- Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Morten E. Allentoft
- Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
- Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guthrie AM, Nevill P, Cooper CE, Bateman PW, van der Heyde M. On a roll: a direct comparison of extraction methods for the recovery of eDNA from roller swabbing of surfaces. BMC Res Notes 2023; 16:370. [PMID: 38111014 PMCID: PMC10726604 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06669-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Roller swabbing of surfaces is an effective way to obtain environmental DNA, but the current DNA extraction method for these samples is equipment heavy, time consuming, and increases potential contamination through multiple handling. Here, we used rollers to swab a dog kennel and compared three DNA extraction approaches (water filtration, roller trimming and direct buffer) using two different platforms (Qiacube, Kingfisher). DNA extraction methods were evaluated based on cost, effort, DNA concentration and PCR result. RESULTS The roller trim method emerged as the optimal method with the best PCR results, DNA concentration and cost efficiency, while the buffer-based methods were the least labour intensive but produced mediocre PCR results and DNA concentrations. Additionally, the Kingfisher magnetic bead extractions generally ranked higher in all categories over the Qiacube column-based DNA extractions. Ultimately, the ideal DNA extraction method for a particular study is influenced by logistical constraints in the field such as the size of the roller, the availability of cold storage, and time constraints on the project. Our results demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, allowing for informed decision making by researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin M Guthrie
- MBioMe - Mine Site Biomonitoring Using eDNA Research Group, Trace and Environmental DNA (TrEnD) Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.
| | - Paul Nevill
- MBioMe - Mine Site Biomonitoring Using eDNA Research Group, Trace and Environmental DNA (TrEnD) Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia
| | - Christine E Cooper
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia
| | - Philip W Bateman
- Behavioural Ecology Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia
| | - Mieke van der Heyde
- MBioMe - Mine Site Biomonitoring Using eDNA Research Group, Trace and Environmental DNA (TrEnD) Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tournayre O, Wolfe R, McCurdy-Adams H, Chabot AA, Lougheed SC. A species-specific digital PCR assay for the endangered blue racer ( Coluber constrictor foxii) in Canada. Genome 2023; 66:251-260. [PMID: 37270848 DOI: 10.1139/gen-2023-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The only population of the endangered blue racer (Coluber constrictor foxii) in Canada occurs on Pelee Island, Ontario. The species is threatened by multiple factors, including habitat degradation and loss, road mortality, persecution, and potentially predation. We designed and evaluated the performance of an environmental DNA droplet digital PCR assay that can be used for multiple facets of conservation of this species. We tested the assay in silico and in vitro using DNA of blue racers and co-occurring snake species and estimated the LOD and LOQ using synthetic DNA. As wild turkey predation has been suggested to negatively affect racers, we tested the assay on eight wild turkey faecal samples. Our assay is specific, can detect the target species at very low levels of concentration (0.002 copies/µL), and can accurately quantify copy numbers ≥ 0.26 copies/µL. We detected no racer DNA in any wild turkey faecal sample. More faecal samples collected at strategic locations during snake peak activity on Pelee Island would enable a more thorough assessment of the possibility of turkey predation. Our assay should be effective for other environmental samples and can be used for investigating other factors negatively affecting blue racers, for example, helping to quantify blue racer habitat suitability and site occupancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orianne Tournayre
- Biology Department, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Ryan Wolfe
- Natural Resource Solutions Inc., Waterloo, ON N2L 3X2, Canada
| | | | - Amy A Chabot
- African Lion Safari, Cambridge, ON N1R 5S2, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Madani G, Pietsch R, Beranek CT. Where are my dragons? Replicating refugia to enhance the detection probability of an endangered cryptic reptile. ACTA OECOLOGICA 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2023.103910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
|
8
|
Ceríaco LMP, Marques MP, de Sousa ACA, Veríssimo J, Beja P, Ferreira S. Illustrated keys and a DNA barcode reference library of the amphibians and terrestrial reptiles (Amphibia, Reptilia) of São Tomé and Príncipe (Gulf of Guinea, West Africa). Zookeys 2023; 1168:41-75. [PMID: 37415718 PMCID: PMC10320720 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1168.101334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The herpetofauna of São Tomé and Príncipe consists of nine species of amphibians, all endemic, and 21 species of terrestrial reptiles, of which 17 are endemic. Our current knowledge regarding its natural history, ecology, and distribution is limited. Here two important tools are provided to support researchers, conservationists, and local authorities in the identification of the country's herpetofauna: an illustrated key to the herpetofauna of the two islands and surroundings islets and a DNA barcode reference library. The keys allow a rapid and unambiguous morphological identification of all occurring species. The DNA barcodes for the entire herpetofauna of the country were produced from 79 specimens, all of which are deposited in museum collections. The barcodes generated are available in online repositories and can be used to provide unambiguous molecular identification of most of the species. Future applications and use of these tools are briefly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Miguel Pires Ceríaco
- Departamento de Zoologia e Antropologia (Museu Bocage), Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência & Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical (IICT), Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica, 58, 1269-102 Lisboa, Portugal
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Museu Nacional, Departamento de Vertebrados, Av. Bartolomeu de Gusmão 875, São Cristóvão, 20941-160 Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal
| | - Mariana Pimentel Marques
- Departamento de Zoologia e Antropologia (Museu Bocage), Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência & Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical (IICT), Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica, 58, 1269-102 Lisboa, Portugal
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal
- Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 1021, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Joana Veríssimo
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal
- Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 1021, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Beja
- Departamento de Zoologia e Antropologia (Museu Bocage), Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência & Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical (IICT), Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica, 58, 1269-102 Lisboa, Portugal
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal
| | - Sónia Ferreira
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Allen MC, Kwait R, Vastano A, Kisurin A, Zoccolo I, Jaffe BD, Angle JC, Maslo B, Lockwood JL. Sampling environmental DNA from trees and soil to detect cryptic arboreal mammals. Sci Rep 2023; 13:180. [PMID: 36604526 PMCID: PMC9814459 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27512-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) approaches to monitoring biodiversity in terrestrial environments have largely focused on sampling water bodies, potentially limiting the geographic and taxonomic scope of eDNA investigations. We assessed the performance of two strictly terrestrial eDNA sampling approaches to detect arboreal mammals, a guild with many threatened and poorly studied taxa worldwide, within two central New Jersey (USA) woodlands. We evaluated species detected with metabarcoding using two eDNA collection methods (tree bark vs. soil sampling), and compared the performance of two detection methods (qPCR vs. metabarcoding) within a single species. Our survey, which included 94 sampling events at 21 trees, detected 16 species of mammals, representing over 60% of the diversity expected in the area. More DNA was found for the 8 arboreal versus 8 non-arboreal species detected (mean: 2466 vs. 289 reads/sample). Soil samples revealed a generally similar composition, but a lower diversity, of mammal species. Detection rates for big brown bat were 3.4 × higher for qPCR over metabarcoding, illustrating the enhanced sensitivity of single-species approaches. Our results suggest that sampling eDNA from on and around trees could serve as a useful new monitoring tool for cryptic arboreal mammal communities globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C. Allen
- grid.430387.b0000 0004 1936 8796Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - Robert Kwait
- grid.430387.b0000 0004 1936 8796Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - Anthony Vastano
- grid.430387.b0000 0004 1936 8796Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - Alex Kisurin
- grid.430387.b0000 0004 1936 8796Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - Isabelle Zoccolo
- grid.430387.b0000 0004 1936 8796Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | | | - Jordan C. Angle
- grid.421234.20000 0004 1112 1641ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Spring, TX USA
| | - Brooke Maslo
- grid.430387.b0000 0004 1936 8796Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - Julie L. Lockwood
- grid.430387.b0000 0004 1936 8796Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kyle KE, Allen MC, Dragon J, Bunnell JF, Reinert HK, Zappalorti R, Jaffe BD, Angle JC, Lockwood JL. Combining surface and soil environmental DNA with artificial cover objects to improve terrestrial reptile survey detection. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2022; 36:e13939. [PMID: 35603473 PMCID: PMC10087970 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Reptiles are increasingly of conservation concern due to their susceptibility to habitat loss, emerging disease, and harvest in the wildlife trade. However, reptile populations are often difficult to monitor given the frequency of crypsis in their life history. This difficulty has left uncertain the conservation status of many species and the efficacy of conservation actions unknown. Environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys consistently elevate the detection rate of species they are designed to monitor, and while their use is promising for terrestrial reptile conservation, successes in developing such surveys have been sparse. We tested the degree to which inclusion of surface and soil eDNA sampling into conventional artificial-cover methods elevates the detection probability of a small, cryptic terrestrial lizard, Scincella lateralis. The eDNA sampling of cover object surfaces with paint rollers elevated per sample detection probabilities for this species 4-16 times compared with visual surveys alone. We readily detected S. lateralis eDNA under cover objects up to 2 weeks after the last visual detection, and at some cover objects where no S. lateralis were visually observed in prior months. With sufficient sampling intensity, eDNA testing of soil under cover objects produced comparable per sample detection probabilities as roller surface methods. Our results suggest that combining eDNA and cover object methods can considerably increase the detection power of reptile monitoring programs, allowing more accurate estimates of population size, detection of temporal and spatial changes in habitat use, and tracking success of restoration efforts. Further research into the deposition and decay rates of reptile eDNA under cover objects, as well as tailored protocols for different species and habitats, is needed to bring the technique into widespread use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen E Kyle
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Michael C Allen
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jeffrey Dragon
- New Jersey Pinelands Commission, Pemberton, New Jersey, USA
| | - John F Bunnell
- New Jersey Pinelands Commission, Pemberton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Howard K Reinert
- Department of Biology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | - Jordan C Angle
- ExxonMobil Upstream Integrated Solutions, Spring, Texas, USA
| | - Julie L Lockwood
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|