1
|
Rios Diaz AJ, Bevilacqua LA, Habarth-Morales TE, Zalewski A, Metcalfe D, Costanzo C, Yeo CJ, Palazzo F. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy vs. Hartmann's procedure for acute diverticulitis: what happens after discharge? Results of a nationwide analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2777-2787. [PMID: 38580758 PMCID: PMC11078837 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10752-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend resection with primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy over Hartmann's procedure if deemed safe for acute diverticulitis. The primary objective of the current study was to compare the utilization of these strategies and describe nationwide ostomy closure patterns and readmission outcomes within 1 year of discharge. METHODS This was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of United States Hospitals reporting to the Nationwide Readmissions Database from January 2011 to December 2019. There were 35,774 patients identified undergoing non-elective primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy or Hartmann's procedure for acute diverticulitis. Rates of ostomy closure, unplanned readmissions, and complications were compared. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to control for patient and hospital-level confounders as well as severity of disease. RESULTS Of the 35,774 patients identified, 93.5% underwent Hartmann's procedure. Half (47.2%) were aged 46-65 years, 50.8% female, 41.2% publicly insured, and 91.7% underwent open surgery. Primary anastomosis was associated with higher rates of 1-year ostomy closure (83.6% vs. 53.4%, p < 0.001) and shorter time-to-closure [median 72 days (Interquartile range 49-103) vs. 115 (86-160); p < 0.001]. Primary anastomosis was associated with increased unplanned readmissions [Hazard Ratio = 2.83 (95% Confidence Interval 2.83-3.37); p < 0.001], but fewer complications upon stoma closure [Odds Ratio 0.51 (95% 0.42-0.63); p < 0.001]. There were no differences in complications between primary anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure during index admission [Odds Ratio = 1.13 (95% Confidence Interval 0.96-1.33); p = 0.137]. CONCLUSION Patients who undergo primary anastomosis for acute diverticulitis are more likely to undergo ostomy reversal and experience fewer postoperative complications upon stoma reversal. These data support the current national guidelines that recommend primary anastomosis in appropriate cases of acute diverticulitis requiring operative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arturo J Rios Diaz
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lisa A Bevilacqua
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Alicja Zalewski
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Metcalfe
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Caitlyn Costanzo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Charles J Yeo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Francesco Palazzo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mortensen LQ, Andresen K, Thygesen L, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J. Diverticulitis Is Associated with Increased Risk of Colon Cancer-A Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2503. [PMID: 38731032 PMCID: PMC11084441 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: An association between diverticulitis and colon cancer has been proposed. The evidence is conflicting, and the guidelines differ regarding recommended follow-up with colonoscopy after an episode of diverticulitis. To guide regimes for follow-up, this study aimed to investigate if patients with diverticulitis have an increased risk of colon cancer. Methods: This study is reported according to the RECORD statement. We performed a cohort study with linked data from nationwide Danish registers. The inclusion period was 1997-2009, and the complete study period was 1995-2013. The primary outcome was the risk of developing colon cancer estimated using a Cox regression analysis with time-varying covariates. We performed a sensitivity analysis on a cohort of people with prior colonoscopies, comparing the risk of colon cancer between the diverticulitis group and the control group. Results: We included 29,173 adult males and females with diverticulitis and 145,865 controls matched for sex and age. The incidence proportion of colon cancer was 2.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-2.3) in the diverticulitis group and 1.5% (95% CI 1.4-1.5) in the matched control group (hazard ratio 1.6; 95% CI 1.5-1.8). The risk of having a colon cancer diagnosis was significantly increased in the first six months after inclusion (hazard ratio 1.7; 95% CI 1.5-1.8), and hereafter there was a lower risk in the diverticulitis group compared with controls (hazard ratio 0.8; 95% CI 0.7-0.9). This protective effect lasted eight years. The increased risk of colon cancer during the first six months after diverticulitis was also found in the cohort with prior colonoscopies. Conclusions: The risk of a colon cancer diagnosis was significantly increased for patients with diverticulitis 0-6 months after the diagnosis of diverticulitis. Hereafter, we found a protective effect of diverticulitis until eight years later, possibly due to a screening effect. We recommend a follow-up colonoscopy after the first diagnosis of diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Quitzau Mortensen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (L.Q.M.)
- Department of Radiology, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Kristoffer Andresen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (L.Q.M.)
| | - Lau Thygesen
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans-Christian Pommergaard
- Hepatic Malignancy Surgical Research Unit (HEPSURU), Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (L.Q.M.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seta T, Iwagami H, Agatsuma N, Noma A, Ikenouchi M, Kubo K, Akamatsu T, Uenoyama Y, Ito D, Yamashita Y, Nakayama T. Efficacy of antimicrobial therapy in patients with uncomplicated acute colonic diverticulitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 35:1097-1106. [PMID: 37577799 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
The need for antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis of the colon remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review of the efficacy of antimicrobial agents against this disease, including new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in recent years, and evaluated their efficacy using a meta-analytic approach. RCTs were searched using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Ichushi-Web, and eight registries. Keywords were 'colonic diverticulitis', 'diverticulitis', 'antimicrobial agents', ''antibiotics, 'complication', 'abscess', 'gastrointestinal perforation', 'gastrointestinal obstruction', 'diverticular hemorrhage', and 'fistula'. Studies with antimicrobial treatment in the intervention group and placebo or no treatment in the control group were selected by multiple reviewers using uniform inclusion criteria, and data were extracted. Prevention of any complication was assessed as the primary outcome, and efficacy was expressed as risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD). A meta-analysis was performed using 5 RCTs of the 21 studies that were eligible for scrutiny in the initial search and which qualified for final inclusion. Three of these studies were not included in the previous meta-analysis. Subjects included 1039 in the intervention group and 1040 in the control group. Pooled RR = 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.28) and pooled RD = -0.01 (-0.03 to 0.01) for the effect of antimicrobial agents in reducing any complications. Recurrences, readmissions, and surgical interventions did not significantly show the efficacies of using antimicrobial agents. A meta-analysis of recently reported RCTs did not provide evidence that antimicrobial therapy improves clinical outcomes in uncomplicated acute diverticulitis of the colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Seta
- Departments of Gastroenterology
- Hepatology and Digestive Cancer Center, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama
- Department of Health Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine & School of Public Health, Kyoto University
| | - Hiroyoshi Iwagami
- Departments of Gastroenterology
- Hepatology and Digestive Cancer Center, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama
| | - Nobukazu Agatsuma
- Departments of Gastroenterology
- Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto
| | - Atsushi Noma
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Digestive Cancer Center, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama
| | - Maiko Ikenouchi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo
| | - Kenji Kubo
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Emergency Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takuji Akamatsu
- Departments of Gastroenterology
- Hepatology and Digestive Cancer Center, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama
| | - Yoshito Uenoyama
- Departments of Gastroenterology
- Hepatology and Digestive Cancer Center, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama
| | - Daisuke Ito
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Digestive Cancer Center, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama
| | - Yukitaka Yamashita
- Departments of Gastroenterology
- Hepatology and Digestive Cancer Center, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama
| | - Takeo Nakayama
- Department of Health Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine & School of Public Health, Kyoto University
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leifeld L, Germer CT, Böhm S, Dumoulin FL, Frieling T, Kreis M, Meining A, Labenz J, Lock JF, Ritz JP, Schreyer A, Kruis W. S3-Leitlinie Divertikelkrankheit/Divertikulitis – Gemeinsame Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:613-688. [PMID: 35388437 DOI: 10.1055/a-1741-5724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ludger Leifeld
- Medizinische Klinik 3 - Gastroenterologie und Allgemeine Innere Medizin, St. Bernward Krankenhaus, Hildesheim, apl. Professur an der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
| | - Christoph-Thomas Germer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für Operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Stephan Böhm
- Spital Bülach, Spitalstrasse 24, 8180 Bülach, Schweiz
| | | | - Thomas Frieling
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Neurogastroenterologie, Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld
| | - Martin Kreis
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Meining
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik 2, Zentrum für Innere Medizin (ZIM), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Joachim Labenz
- Abteilung für Innere Medizin, Evang. Jung-Stilling-Krankenhaus, Siegen
| | - Johan Friso Lock
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für Operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Jörg-Peter Ritz
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Helios Klinikum Schwerin
| | - Andreas Schreyer
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane Klinikum Brandenburg, Brandenburg, Deutschland
| | - Wolfgang Kruis
- Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jeganathan NA, Davenport ER, Yochum GS, Koltun WA. The microbiome of diverticulitis. CURRENT OPINION IN PHYSIOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cophys.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
6
|
von Strauss Und Torney M, Moffa G, Kaech M, Haak F, Riss S, Deutschmann E, Bucher HC, Kettelhack C, Paterson HM. Risk of Emergency Surgery or Death After Initial Nonoperative Management of Complicated Diverticulitis in Scotland and Switzerland. JAMA Surg 2021; 155:600-606. [PMID: 32401298 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Importance National guidelines on interval resection for prevention of recurrence after complicated diverticulitis are inconsistent. Although US and German guidelines favor interval colonic resection to prevent a perceived high risk of recurrence, UK guidelines do not. Objectives To investigate patient management and outcomes after an index inpatient episode of nonoperatively managed complicated diverticulitis in Switzerland and Scotland and determine whether interval resection was associated with the rate of disease-specific emergency surgery or death in either country. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis of anonymized complete national inpatient data sets included all patients with an inpatient episode of successfully nonoperatively managed complicated diverticulitis in Switzerland and Scotland from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015. The 2 countries have contrasting health care systems: Switzerland is insurance funded, while Scotland is state funded. Statistical analysis was conducted from February 1, 2018, to October 17, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point defined a priori before the analysis was adverse outcome, defined as any disease-specific emergency surgical intervention or inpatient death after the initial successful nonsurgical inpatient management of an episode of complicated diverticulitis, including complications from interval elective surgery. Results The study cohort comprised 13 861 inpatients in Switzerland (6967 women) and 5129 inpatients in Scotland (2804 women) with an index episode of complicated acute diverticulitis managed nonoperatively. The primary end point was observed in 698 Swiss patients (5.0%) and 255 Scottish patients (5.0%) (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.19). Elective interval colonic resection was undertaken in 3280 Swiss patients (23.7%; median follow-up, 53 months [interquartile range, 24-90 months]) and 231 Scottish patients (4.5%; median follow-up, 57 months [interquartile range, 27-91 months]). Death after urgent readmission for recurrent diverticulitis occurred in 104 patients (0.8%) in Switzerland and 65 patients (1.3%) in Scotland. None of the investigated confounders had a significant association with the outcome apart from comorbidity. Conclusions and Relevance This study found no difference in the rate of adverse outcome (emergency surgery and/or inpatient death) despite a 5-fold difference in interval resection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco von Strauss Und Torney
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Academic Coloproctology, University of Edinburgh/Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Giusi Moffa
- Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Max Kaech
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Haak
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Riss
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Deutschmann
- Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Heiner C Bucher
- Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Kettelhack
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hugh M Paterson
- Academic Coloproctology, University of Edinburgh/Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bezerra RP, Costa ACD, Santa-Cruz F, Ferraz ÁAB. HARTMANN PROCEDURE OR RESECTION WITH PRIMARY ANASTOMOSIS FOR TREATMENT OF PERFORATED DIVERTICULITIS? SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA : ABCD = BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY 2021; 33:e1546. [PMID: 33470376 PMCID: PMC7812685 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020200003e1546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality after emergency surgery in randomized controlled trials. The Hartmann procedure remains the treatment of choice for most surgeons for the urgent surgical treatment of perforated diverticulitis; however, it is associated with high rates of ostomy non-reversion and postoperative morbidity. AIM To study the results after the Hartmann vs. resection with primary anastomosis, with or without ileostomy, for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey grade III or IV), and to compare the advantages between the two forms of treatment. METHOD Systematic search in the literature of observational and randomized articles comparing resection with primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann's procedure in the emergency treatment of perforated diverticulitis. Analyze as primary outcomes the mortality after the emergency operation and the general morbidity after it. As secondary outcomes, severe morbidity after emergency surgery, rates of non-reversion of the ostomy, general and severe morbidity after reversion. RESULTS There were no significant differences between surgical procedures for mortality, general morbidity and severe morbidity. However, the differences were statistically significant, favoring primary anastomosis in comparison with the Hartmann procedure in the outcome rates of stoma non-reversion, general morbidity and severe morbidity after reversion. CONCLUSION Primary anastomosis is a good alternative to the Hartmann procedure, with no increase in mortality and morbidity, and with better results in the operation for intestinal transit reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Álvaro A B Ferraz
- Department of Surgery, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Treating acute colonic diverticulitis with extraluminal pericolic air: An Acute Care Surgery in the Netherlands (ACCSENT) multicenter retrospective cohort study. Surgery 2020; 169:1182-1187. [PMID: 33257036 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Owing to improved quality of computed tomography, a new category of complicated acute diverticulitis, including patients with pericolic air but without abscess formation, can be defined (Hinchey 1a). Recent studies question whether this new category of acute diverticulitis could be treated as uncomplicated cases. The aim of our study is to report on the clinical course of acute diverticulitis Hinchey 1a in current clinical practice. METHODS For this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients presenting at the emergency department with Hinchey 1a acute diverticulitis as demonstrated by computed tomography scan, were identified. The primary outcome measure was successful conservative treatment with observation alone, antibiotics, and/or hospital admission. Readmissions, percutaneous drainage of abscesses, and emergency operations were considered as failure. RESULTS Between October 2016 and October 2018, 1,199 patients were clinically suspected for acute diverticulitis, of whom 101 (8.4%) were radiologically diagnosed to have type 1a acute diverticulitis (average age 57 (±13) years, 45% female) and started with conservative treatment. This was successful in 86 (85%) patients. One of the 15 unsuccessfully treated patients (1%) received percutaneous drainage of an abdominal abscess. Surgery was required in 9 cases (9%) after a median time of 6 days (range, 3 to 69 days). Although a difference in the volume of extraluminal air on computed tomography scan was found, this was not shown to be a risk factor for the clinical course. CONCLUSION Patients with type 1a acute diverticulitis can be treated successfully by conservative therapy in the majority of cases (85%). More research is required to define predictive factors for successful conservative management.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Bustamante-Balén M, Pons-Beltrán V. But, what are you telling me? GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2020; 44:572. [PMID: 33187745 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2020.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Unidad de Endoscopias, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, España.
| | - Marco Bustamante-Balén
- Unidad de Endoscopias, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Vicente Pons-Beltrán
- Unidad de Endoscopias, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rai V, Mishra N. Surgical Management of Recurrent Uncomplicated Diverticulitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2020; 34:91-95. [PMID: 33642948 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Sigmoid diverticulitis represents a most common gastroenterological diagnosis in the western world. There has been a significant change in the management of recurrent uncomplicated diverticulitis in the last 10 to 15 years. The absolute number of previous episodes is not used as criteria to recommend surgery anymore. Young age is no longer considered to be an indication for more aggressive surgical treatment. It is accepted that subsequent episodes of diverticulitis are not significantly worse than the first episode. Laparoscopic surgery is now the standard of care for elective surgery for diverticulitis where expertise is available. There is a consensus that decision to perform sigmoid colectomy should be individualized, after careful risk benefit assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Rai
- Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Nitin Mishra
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hawkins AT, Wise PE, Chan T, Lee JT, Glyn T, Wood V, Eglinton T, Frizelle F, Khan A, Hall J, Ilyas MIM, Michailidou M, Nfonsam VN, Cowan ML, Williams J, Steele SR, Alavi K, Ellis CT, Collins D, Winter DC, Zaghiyan K, Gallo G, Carvello M, Spinelli A, Lightner AL. Diverticulitis: An Update From the Age Old Paradigm. Curr Probl Surg 2020; 57:100862. [PMID: 33077029 PMCID: PMC7575828 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
For a disease process that affects so many, we continue to struggle to define optimal care for patients with diverticular disease. Part of this stems from the fact that diverticular disease requires different treatment strategies across the natural history- acute, chronic and recurrent. To understand where we are currently, it is worth understanding how treatment of diverticular disease has evolved. Diverticular disease was rarely described in the literature prior to the 1900’s. In the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, Painter and Burkitt popularized the theory that diverticulosis is a disease of Western civilization based on the observation that diverticulosis was rare in rural Africa but common in economically developed countries. Previous surgical guidelines focused on early operative intervention to avoid potential complicated episodes of recurrent complicated diverticulitis (e.g., with free perforation) that might necessitate emergent surgery and stoma formation. More recent data has challenged prior concerns about decreasing effectiveness of medical management with repeat episodes and the notion that the natural history of diverticulitis is progressive. It has also permitted more accurate grading of the severity of disease and permitted less invasive management options to attempt conversion of urgent operations into the elective setting, or even avoid an operation altogether. The role of diet in preventing diverticular disease has long been debated. A high fiber diet appears to decrease the likelihood of symptomatic diverticulitis. The myth of avoid eating nuts, corn, popcorn, and seeds to prevent episodes of diverticulitis has been debunked with modern data. Overall, the recommendations for “diverticulitis diets” mirror those made for overall healthy lifestyle – high fiber, with a focus on whole grains, fruits and vegetables. Diverticulosis is one of the most common incidental findings on colonoscopy and the eighth most common outpatient diagnosis in the United States. Over 50% of people over the age of 60 and over 60% of people over age 80 have colonic diverticula. Of those with diverticulosis, the lifetime risk of developing diverticulitis is estimated at 10–25%, although more recent studies estimate a 5% rate of progression to diverticulitis. Diverticulitis accounts for an estimated 371,000 emergency department visits and 200,000 inpatient admissions per year with annual cost of 2.1–2.6 billion dollars per year in the United States. The estimated total medical expenditure (inpatient and outpatient) for diverticulosis and diverticulitis in 2015 was over 5.4 billion dollars. The incidence of diverticulitis is increasing. Besides increasing age, other risk factors for diverticular disease include use of NSAIDS, aspirin, steroids, opioids, smoking and sedentary lifestyle. Diverticula most commonly occur along the mesenteric side of the antimesenteric taeniae resulting in parallel rows. These spots are thought to be relatively weak as this is the location where vasa recta penetrate the muscle to supply the mucosa. The exact mechanism that leads to diverticulitis from diverticulosis is not definitively known. The most common presenting complaint is of left lower quadrant abdominal pain with symptoms of systemic unwellness including fever and malaise, however the presentation may vary widely. The gold standard cross-sectional imaging is multi-detector CT. It is minimally invasive and has sensitivity between 98% and specificity up to 99% for diagnosing acute diverticulitis. Uncomplicated acute diverticulitis may be safely managed as an out-patient in carefully selected patients. Hospitalization is usually necessary for patients with immunosuppression, intolerance to oral intake, signs of severe sepsis, lack of social support and increased comorbidities. The role of antibiotics has been questioned in a number of randomized controlled trials and it is likely that we will see more patients with uncomplicated disease treated with observation in the future Acute diverticulitis can be further sub classified into complicated and uncomplicated presentations. Uncomplicated diverticulitis is characterized by inflammation limited to colonic wall and surrounding tissue. The management of uncomplicated diverticulitis is changing. Use of antibiotics has been questioned as it appears that antibiotic use can be avoided in select groups of patients. Surgical intervention appears to improve patient’s quality of life. The decision to proceed with surgery is recommended in an individualized manner. Complicated diverticulitis is defined as diverticulitis associated with localized or generalized perforation, localized or distant abscess, fistula, stricture or obstruction. Abscesses can be treated with percutaneous drainage if the abscess is large enough. The optimal long-term strategy for patients who undergo successful non-operative management of their diverticular abscess remains controversial. There are clearly patients who would do well with an elective colectomy and a subset who could avoid an operation all together however, the challenge is appropriate risk-stratification and patient selection. Management of patients with perforation depends greatly on the presence of feculent or purulent peritonitis, the extent of contamination and hemodynamic status and associated comorbidities. Fistulas and strictures are almost always treated with segmental colectomy. After an episode of acute diverticulitis, routine colonoscopy has been recommended by a number of societies to exclude the presence of colorectal cancer or presence of alternative diagnosis like ischemic colitis or inflammatory bowel disease for the clinical presentation. Endoscopic evaluation of the colon is normally delayed by about 6 weeks from the acute episode to reduce the risk associated with colonoscopy. Further study has questioned the need for endoscopic evaluation for every patient with acute diverticulitis. Colonoscopy should be routinely performed after complicated diverticulitis cases, when the clinical presentation is atypical or if there are any diagnostic ambiguity, or patient has other indications for colonoscopy like rectal bleeding or is above 50 years of age without recent colonoscopy. For patients in whom elective colectomy is indicated, it is imperative to identify a wide range of modifiable patient co-morbidities. Every attempt should be made to improve a patient’s chance of successful surgery. This includes optimization of patient risk factors as well as tailoring the surgical approach and perioperative management. A positive outcome depends greatly on thoughtful attention to what makes a complicated patient “complicated”. Operative management remains complex and depends on multiple factors including patient age, comorbidities, nutritional state, severity of disease, and surgeon preference and experience. Importantly, the status of surgery, elective versus urgent or emergent operation, is pivotal in decision-making, and treatment algorithms are divergent based on the acuteness of surgery. Resection of diseased bowel to healthy proximal colon and rectal margins remains a fundamental principle of treatment although the operative approach may vary. For acute diverticulitis, a number of surgical approaches exist, including loop colostomy, sigmoidectomy with colostomy (Hartmann’s procedure) and sigmoidectomy with primary colorectal anastomosis. Overall, data suggest that primary anastomosis is preferable to a Hartman’s procedure in select patients with acute diverticulitis. Patients with hemodynamic instability, immunocompromised state, feculent peritonitis, severely edematous or ischemic bowel, or significant malnutrition are poor candidates. The decision to divert after colorectal anastomosis is at the discretion of the operating surgeon. Patient factors including severity of disease, tissue quality, and comorbidities should be considered. Technical considerations for elective cases include appropriate bowel preparation, the use of a laparoscopic approach, the decision to perform a primary anastomosis, and the selected use of ureteral stents. Management of the patient with an end colostomy after a Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis can be a challenging clinical scenario. Between 20 – 50% of patients treated with sigmoid resection and an end colostomy after an initial severe bout of diverticulitis will never be reversed to their normal anatomy. The reasons for high rates of permanent colostomies are multifactorial. The debate on the best timing for a colostomy takedown continues. Six months is generally chosen as the safest time to proceed when adhesions may be at their softest allowing for a more favorable dissection. The surgical approach will be a personal decision by the operating surgeon based on his or her experience. Colostomy takedown operations are challenging surgeries. The surgeon should anticipate and appropriately plan for a long and difficult operation. The patient should undergo a full antibiotic bowel preparation. Preoperative planning is critical; review the initial operative note and defining the anatomy prior to reversal. When a complex abdominal wall closure is necessary, consider consultation with a hernia specialist. Open surgery is the preferred surgical approach for the majority of colostomy takedown operations. Finally, consider ureteral catheters, diverting loop ileostomy, and be prepared for all anastomotic options in advance. Since its inception in the late 90’s, laparoscopic lavage has been recognized as a novel treatment modality in the management of complicated diverticulitis; specifically, Hinchey III (purulent) diverticulitis. Over the last decade, it has been the subject of several randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, systematic reviews as well as cost-efficiency analyses. Despite being the subject of much debate and controversy, there is a clear role for laparoscopic lavage in the management of acute diverticulitis with the caveat that patient selection is key. Segmental colitis associated with diverticulitis (SCAD) is an inflammatory condition affecting the colon in segments that are also affected by diverticulosis, namely, the sigmoid colon. While SCAD is considered a separate clinical entity, it is frequently confused with diverticulitis or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). SCAD affects approximately 1.4% of the general population and 1.15 to 11.4% of those with diverticulosis and most commonly affects those in their 6th decade of life. The exact pathogenesis of SCAD is unknown, but proposed mechanisms include mucosal redundancy and prolapse occurring in diverticular segments, fecal stasis, and localized ischemia. Most case of SCAD resolve with a high-fiber diet and antibiotics, with salicylates reserved for more severe cases. Relapse is uncommon and immunosuppression with steroids is rarely needed. A relapsing clinical course may suggest a diagnosis of IBD and treatment as such should be initiated. Surgery is extremely uncommon and reserved for severe refractory disease. While sigmoid colon involvement is considered the most common site of colonic diverticulitis in Western countries, diverticular disease can be problematic in other areas of the colon. In Asian countries, right-sided diverticulitis outnumbers the left. This difference seems to be secondary to dietary and genetic factors. Differential diagnosis might be difficult because of similarity with appendicitis. However accurate imaging studies allow a precise preoperative diagnosis and management planning. Transverse colonic diverticulitis is very rare accounting for less than 1% of colonic diverticulitis with a perforation rate that has been estimated to be even more rare. Rectal diverticula are mostly asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally in the majority of patients and rarely require treatment. Giant colonic diverticula (GCD) is a rare presentation of diverticular disease of the colon and it is defined as an air-filled cystic diverticulum larger than 4 cm in diameter. The pathogenesis of GCD is not well defined. Overall, the management of diverticular disease depends greatly on patient, disease and surgeon factors. Only by tailoring treatment to the patient in front of us can we achieve optimal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander T Hawkins
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
| | - Paul E Wise
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Tiffany Chan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janet T Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN
| | - Tamara Glyn
- University of Otago, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Verity Wood
- Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Timothy Eglinton
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Frank Frizelle
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Adil Khan
- Raleigh General Hospital, Beckley, WV
| | - Jason Hall
- Dempsey Center for Digestive Disorders, Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott R Steele
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Oh
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - C Tyler Ellis
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | | | - Des C Winter
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Gaetano Gallo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Michele Carvello
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milano, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milano, Italy
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Azhar N, Buchwald P, Ansari HZ, Schyman T, Yaqub S, Øresland T, Schultz JK. Risk of colorectal cancer following CT-verified acute diverticulitis: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1406-1414. [PMID: 32301257 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Routine colonoscopy to exclude colorectal cancer (CRC) after CT-verified acute diverticulitis is controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of CRC in patients with acute diverticulitis with that in the general population. METHOD Patients with an emergency admission for diverticular disease to any Norwegian hospital between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2010 were included through identification in the Norwegian Patient Registry using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes K57.1-9. To estimate the age-specific distribution of CT-verified acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) and acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) in this nationwide study population, numbers from the largest Norwegian emergency hospital were used. Patients diagnosed with CRC within 1 year following their admission for acute diverticulitis were detected through cross-matching with the Cancer Registry of Norway. Based on both Norwegian age-specific incidence of CRC and estimated age-specific distribution of CT-verified diverticulitis, standard morbidity ratios (SMRs) were calculated. RESULTS A total of 7473 patients with emergency admissions for diverticular disease were identified (estimated CT-verified AUD n = 3523, ACD n = 1206); of these 155 patients were diagnosed with CRC within 1 year. Eighty had a CT-verified diverticulitis at index admission [41 AUD (51.3%); 39 ACD (49.7%)]. Compared with the general population, the SMR was 6.6 following CT-verified AUD and 16.3 following ACD, respectively. CONCLUSION In the first year after CT-verified acute diverticulitis, especially after ACD, the risk of CRC is higher than in the general population. This probably represents misdiagnosis of CRC as acute diverticulitis. Follow-up colonoscopy should be recommended to all patients admitted with acute diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Azhar
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - P Buchwald
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - H Z Ansari
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - T Schyman
- Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - S Yaqub
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Øresland
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - J K Schultz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diverticular disease is of major clinical and health economic importance in Germany. Treatment recommendations in many international guidelines have changed significantly in recent years. The German national S2k guidelines are currently being revised. OBJECTIVE To summarize the most important clinical aspects in the management of diverticular disease from a surgical perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS The recommendations were compiled based on current national and international guidelines and a selective literature search. RESULTS Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis without risk factors can be treated on an outpatient basis without antibiotics. For patients with complicated diverticulitis, hospital admission with parenteral antibiotic treatment is recommended. In the case of abscess formation >5 cm, percutaneous drainage can be performed. The indications for immediate sigmoid resection are free perforation and failure of conservative treatment. Elective resection is indicated in chronic recurrent diverticulitis with complications; all other indications are increasingly based on the individual quality of life of the patient. CONCLUSION Uncomplicated diverticulitis is increasingly being treated on an outpatient basis and without antibiotics. Apart from emergency settings, the indications for surgery are increasingly dependent on the quality of life. Elective sigmoid resection should be performed as laparoscopic surgery with primary anastomosis after obtaining results of computed tomography and total colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Schultz JK, Azhar N, Binda GA, Barbara G, Biondo S, Boermeester MA, Chabok A, Consten ECJ, van Dijk ST, Johanssen A, Kruis W, Lambrichts D, Post S, Ris F, Rockall TA, Samuelsson A, Di Saverio S, Tartaglia D, Thorisson A, Winter DC, Bemelman W, Angenete E. European Society of Coloproctology: guidelines for the management of diverticular disease of the colon. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22 Suppl 2:5-28. [PMID: 32638537 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The goal of this European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) guideline project is to give an overview of the existing evidence on the management of diverticular disease, primarily as a guidance to surgeons. METHODS The guideline was developed during several working phases including three voting rounds and one consensus meeting. The two project leads (JKS and EA) appointed by the ESCP guideline committee together with one member of the guideline committee (WB) agreed on the methodology, decided on six themes for working groups (WGs) and drafted a list of research questions. Senior WG members, mostly colorectal surgeons within the ESCP, were invited based on publication records and geographical aspects. Other specialties were included in the WGs where relevant. In addition, one trainee or PhD fellow was invited in each WG. All six WGs revised the research questions if necessary, did a literature search, created evidence tables where feasible, and drafted supporting text to each research question and statement. The text and statement proposals from each WG were arranged as one document by the first and last authors before online voting by all authors in two rounds. For the second voting ESCP national representatives were also invited. More than 90% agreement was considered a consensus. The final phrasing of the statements with < 90% agreement was discussed in a consensus meeting at the ESCP annual meeting in Vienna in September 2019. Thereafter, the first and the last author drafted the final text of the guideline and circulated it for final approval and for a third and final online voting of rephrased statements. RESULTS This guideline contains 38 evidence based consensus statements on the management of diverticular disease. CONCLUSION This international, multidisciplinary guideline provides an up to date summary of the current knowledge of the management of diverticular disease as a guidance for clinicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Schultz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - N Azhar
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - G A Binda
- Colorectal Surgery, BioMedical Institute, Genova, Italy
| | - G Barbara
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Biondo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery - Colorectal Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona and IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Chabok
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S T van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Johanssen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - W Kruis
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Lambrichts
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Post
- Mannheim Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - F Ris
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T A Rockall
- Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit (mattu), Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - A Samuelsson
- Department of Surgery, NU-Hospital Group, Region Västra Götaland, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S Di Saverio
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.,Department of General Surgery, ASST Sette Laghi, University Hospital of Varese, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - D Tartaglia
- Emergency Surgery Unit, New Santa Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Thorisson
- Department of Radiology, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden.,Centre for Clinical Research of Uppsala University, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden
| | - D C Winter
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - W Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
A Hospital Protocol for Decision Making in Emergency Admission for Acute Diverticulitis: Initial Results from Small Cohort Series. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56080371. [PMID: 32722066 PMCID: PMC7466311 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56080371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: We present initial results from a small cohort series for a hospital protocol related to the emergency hospitalization decision-making process for acute diverticulitis. We performed a retrospective analysis of 53 patients with acute diverticulitis admitted to the Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery of the "Azienda Ospedaliero Universiaria-Ospedali Riuniti" in Ancona and to the Department of General and Emergency Surgery of the "Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria" in Perugia. Materials and Methods: All patients were evaluated according to hemodynamic status: stable or unstable. Secondly, it was distinguished whether patients were suffering from complicated or uncomplicated forms of diverticulitis. Finally, each patient was assigned to a risk class. In this way, we established a therapeutic/diagnostic process for each group of patients. Results: Non-operative treatment (NonOP) was performed in 16 patients, and it was successful in 69% of cases. This protocol primarily considers the patient's clinical condition and the severity of the disease. It is based on a multidisciplinary approach, in order to implement the most suitable treatment for each patient. In stable patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis or complicated Hinchey grade 1 or 2 diverticulitis, the management is conservative. In all grade 3 and grade 4 forms, patients should undergo urgent surgery. Conclusions: This protocol, which is based on both anatomical damage and the severity of clinical conditions, aims to standardize the choice of the best diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for the patient in order to reduce mortality and morbidity related to this pathology.
Collapse
|
16
|
Costi R, Annicchiarico A, Morini A, Romboli A, Zarzavadjian Le Bian A, Violi V. Acute diverticulitis: old challenge, current trends, open questions. MINERVA CHIR 2020; 75:173-192. [PMID: 32550727 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.20.08314-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Acute diverticulitis (AD) is an increasing issue for health systems worldwide. As accuracy of clinical symptoms and laboratory examinations is poor, a pivotal role in preoperative diagnosis and severity assessment is played by CT scan. Several new classifications trying to adapt the intraoperative Hinchey's classification to preoperative CT findings have been proposed, but none really entered clinical practice. Treatment of early AD is mostly conservative (antibiotics) and may be administered in outpatients in selected cases. Larger abscesses (exceeding 3 to 5 cm) need percutaneous drainage, while management of stages 3 (purulent peritonitis) and 4 (fecal peritonitis) is difficult to standardize, as various approaches are nowadays suggested. Three situations are identified: situation A, stage 3 in stable/healthy patients, where various options are available, including conservative management, lavage/drainage and primary resection/anastomosis w/without protective stoma; situation B, stage 3 in unstable and/or unhealthy patients, and stage 4 in stable/healthy patients, where stoma-protected primary resection/anastomosis or Hartmann procedure should be performed; situation C, stage 4 in unstable and/or unhealthy patients, where Hartmann procedure or damage control surgery (resection without any anastomosis/stoma) are suggested. Late, elective sigmoid resection is less and less performed, as a new trend towards a patient-tailored management is spreading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Costi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Unit of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Vaio, Fidenza, Parma, Italy.,AUSL di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Morini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Andrea Romboli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian
- Service of General, Digestive, Oncologic, Bariatric, and Metabolic Surgery, Avicenne Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Paris XIII University, Bobigny, France
| | - Vincenzo Violi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Unit of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Vaio, Fidenza, Parma, Italy.,AUSL di Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Multifocal Versus Conventional Unifocal Diverticulitis: A Comparison of Clinical and Transcriptomic Characteristics. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64:3143-3151. [PMID: 30511196 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5403-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of diverticulitis is compromised by difficulty in identifying patients who require surgery for recurrent or persistent disease. Here, we introduce the concept of multifocal diverticulitis (MFD), characterized by multiple episodes of diverticulitis occurring at different locations within the colon. AIMS To compare clinical characteristics, success of surgical management, and colonic transcriptomes of MFD patients to patients with conventional unifocal diverticulitis (UFD). METHODS This retrospective study included 404 patients with CT-confirmed diverticulitis episodes. Patients with diverticulitis seen in at least two different colonic locations were classified as the MFD group and compared to the UFD group based on number of episodes, sites of disease, family history, surgeries performed, and postoperative recurrence. RNA-seq was conducted on full-thickness colonic tissues of ten MFD and 11 UFD patients. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients (6.9%) with MFD were identified. MFD patients had more diverticulitis episodes and were more likely to have positive family history, have right-sided disease, require surgery, and have recurrence after surgery. All MFD patients treated with segmental resection had recurrence, while recurrence was less common in patients undergoing more extensive surgery (P < 0.001). Using RNA-seq, we identified 69 genes that were differentially expressed between MFD and UFD patients. Significantly down-regulated genes were associated with immune response pathways. CONCLUSIONS MFD appears to be a more severe subset of diverticulitis with a possible genetic component. Transcriptomic data suggest that MFD may be associated with alteration of the immune response.
Collapse
|
18
|
Macía-Suárez D. Is it useful ultrasonography as the first-line imaging technique in patients with suspected acute diverticulitis? RADIOLOGIA 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2019.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
19
|
Prospective randomized clinical trial of uncomplicated right-sided colonic diverticulitis: antibiotics versus no antibiotics. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:1413-1420. [PMID: 31267222 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03343-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Antibiotics are widely used in the treatment of uncomplicated left-sided colonic diverticulitis. In Asian countries, however, right-sided colonic diverticulitis is more common than left-sided colonic diverticulitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the need for antibiotics in the treatment of uncomplicated right-sided colonic diverticulitis in an Asian population. METHODS Patients were randomized to two management strategies: antibiotics and no antibiotics. At 4-6 weeks after discharge, the patients in both groups underwent computed tomography or were contacted by phone to confirm the effectiveness of the treatment. The primary end point was the treatment failure rate of the initial treatment, and secondary end points were the length of hospital stay and total admission costs. RESULTS Patients were randomized to treatment with (61 patients) or without (64 patients) antibiotics. The rates of treatment failure in the antibiotics and no antibiotics groups were 1.7% and 4.6%, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.619). There was also no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the groups (P = 0.983). Total admission costs were lower in the no antibiotics group than in the antibiotics group (US$1004.70 vs US$1112.40, respectively, P = 0.037). CONCLUSION Conservative management of uncomplicated right-sided colonic diverticulitis without antibiotics shows similar treatment failure rates and length of hospital stay, and is associated with lower hospital costs, compared with standard antibiotic treatment. Therefore, conservative management can be considered as a safe treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrial.gov No. NCT02314013.
Collapse
|
20
|
You H, Sweeny A, Cooper ML, Von Papen M, Innes J. The management of diverticulitis: a review of the guidelines. Med J Aust 2019; 211:421-427. [PMID: 31352692 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiological evidence of inflammation, using computed tomography (CT), is needed to diagnose the first occurrence of diverticulitis. CT is also warranted when the severity of symptoms suggests that perforation or abscesses have occurred. Diverticulitis is classified as complicated or uncomplicated based on CT scan, severity of symptoms and patient history; this classification is used to direct management. Outpatient treatment is recommended in afebrile, clinically stable patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis. For patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis, antibiotics have no proven benefit in reducing the duration of the disease or preventing recurrence, and should only be used selectively. For complicated diverticulitis, non-operative management, including bowel rest and intravenous antibiotics, is indicated for small abscesses; larger abscesses of 3-5 cm should be drained percutaneously. Patients with peritonitis and sepsis should receive fluid resuscitation, rapid antibiotic administration and urgent surgery. Surgical intervention with either Hartmann procedure or primary anastomosis, with or without diverting loop ileostomy, is indicated for peritonitis or in failure of non-operative management. Colonoscopy is recommended for all patients with complicated diverticulitis 6 weeks after CT diagnosis of inflammation, and for patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis who have suspicious features on CT scan or who otherwise meet national bowel cancer screening criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy Sweeny
- Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD.,Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD.,Research Support Network, Queensland Emergency Medicine Foundation, Brisbane, QLD
| | | | - Michael Von Papen
- Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD.,Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD
| | - James Innes
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Macía-Suárez D. Is it useful ultrasonography as the first-line imaging technique in patients with suspected acute diverticulitis? RADIOLOGIA 2019; 61:506-509. [PMID: 31272789 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The growing demand for computed tomography studies clashes with the restrictions on the use of ionizing radiation that are being reflected more and more clearly in good practice guidelines and legislation. One paradigmatic example is the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis, for which a increasing amount of computed tomography studies are being demanded with the justification that they are clinically necessary and more reliable than ultrasound studies. The present paper reviews the scientific evidence about the diagnostic validity of ultrasonography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis of the colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Macía-Suárez
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (LADIES): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, superiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:599-610. [PMID: 31178342 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30174-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have suggested that sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis is superior to Hartmann's procedure. The likelihood of stoma reversal after primary anastomosis has been reported to be higher and reversal seems to be associated with lower morbidity and mortality. Although promising, results from these previous studies remain uncertain because of potential selection bias. Therefore, this study aimed to assess outcomes after Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis, with or without defunctioning ileostomy, for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (Hinchey III or IV disease) in a randomised trial. METHODS A multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial was done in eight academic hospitals and 34 teaching hospitals in Belgium, Italy, and the Netherlands. Patients aged between 18 and 85 years who presented with clinical signs of general peritonitis and suspected perforated diverticulitis were eligible for inclusion if plain abdominal radiography or CT scan showed diffuse free air or fluid. Patients with Hinchey I or II diverticulitis were not eligible for inclusion. Patients were allocated (1:1) to Hartmann's procedure or sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis, with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Patients were enrolled by the surgeon or surgical resident involved, and secure online randomisation software was used in the operating room or by the trial coordinator on the phone. Random and concealed block sizes of two, four, or six were used, and randomisation was stratified by age (<60 and ≥60 years). The primary endpoint was 12-month stoma-free survival. Patients were analysed according to a modified intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR2037, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01317485. FINDINGS Between July 1, 2010, and Feb 22, 2013, and June 9, 2013, and trial termination on June 3, 2016, 133 patients (93 with Hinchey III disease and 40 with Hinchey IV disease) were randomly assigned to Hartmann's procedure (68 patients) or primary anastomosis (65 patients). Two patients in the Hartmann's group were excluded, as was one in the primary anastomosis group; the modified intention-to-treat population therefore consisted of 66 patients in the Hartmann's procedure group (46 with Hinchey III disease, 20 with Hinchey IV disease) and 64 in the primary anastomosis group (46 with Hinchey III disease, 18 with Hinchey IV disease). In 17 (27%) of 64 patients assigned to primary anastomosis, no stoma was constructed. 12-month stoma-free survival was significantly better for patients undergoing primary anastomosis compared with Hartmann's procedure (94·6% [95% CI 88·7-100] vs 71·7% [95% CI 60·1-83·3], hazard ratio 2·79 [95% CI 1·86-4·18]; log-rank p<0·0001). There were no significant differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after the index procedure for Hartmann's procedure compared with primary anastomosis (morbidity: 29 [44%] of 66 patients vs 25 [39%] of 64, p=0·60; mortality: two [3%] vs four [6%], p=0·44). INTERPRETATION In haemodynamically stable, immunocompetent patients younger than 85 years, primary anastomosis is preferable to Hartmann's procedure as a treatment for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey III or Hinchey IV disease). FUNDING Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.
Collapse
|
23
|
Sneiders D, Lambrichts DPV, Swank HA, Blanken‐Peeters CFJM, Nienhuijs SW, Govaert MJPM, Gerhards MF, Hoofwijk AGM, Bosker RJI, van der Bilt JDW, Heijnen BHM, ten Cate Hoedemaker HO, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Bemelman WA. Long-term follow-up of a multicentre cohort study on laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:705-714. [PMID: 30771246 PMCID: PMC6850083 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has increasingly been investigated as a promising alternative to sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis. Most studies only reported outcomes up to 12 months. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of patients treated with laparoscopic lavage. METHODS Between 2008 and 2010, 38 patients treated with laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in 10 Dutch teaching hospitals were included. Long-term follow-up data on patient outcomes, e.g. diverticulitis recurrence, reoperations and readmissions, were collected retrospectively. The characteristics of patients with recurrent diverticulitis or complications requiring surgery or leading to death, categorized as 'overall complicated outcome', were compared with patients who developed no complications or complications not requiring surgery. RESULTS The median follow-up was 46 months (interquartile range 7-77), during which 17 episodes of recurrent diverticulitis (seven complicated) in 12 patients (32%) occurred. Twelve patients (32%) required additional surgery with a total of 29 procedures. Fifteen patients (39%) had a total of 50 readmissions. Of initially successfully treated patients (n = 31), 12 (31%) had recurrent diverticulitis or other complications. At 90 days, 32 (84%) patients were alive without undergoing a sigmoidectomy. However, seven (22%) of these patients eventually had a sigmoidectomy after 90 days. Diverticulitis-related events occurred up to 6 years after the index procedure. CONCLUSION Long-term diverticulitis recurrence, re-intervention and readmission rates after laparoscopic lavage were high. A complicated outcome was also seen in patients who had initially been treated successfully with laparoscopic lavage with relevant events occurring up to 6 years after initial surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Sneiders
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - D. P. V. Lambrichts
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands,Department of SurgeryAmsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum (AMC)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - H. A. Swank
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum (AMC)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - S. W. Nienhuijs
- Department of SurgeryCatharina HospitalEindhovenThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - A. G. M. Hoofwijk
- Department of SurgeryZuyderland Medical CenterSittard‐GeleenThe Netherlands
| | - R. J. I. Bosker
- Department of SurgeryDeventer HospitalDeventerThe Netherlands
| | | | - B. H. M. Heijnen
- Department of SurgeryLange Land HospitalZoetermeerThe Netherlands
| | | | - G. J. Kleinrensink
- Department of NeuroscienceErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - J. F. Lange
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands,Department of SurgeryIJsselland HospitalCapelle aan den IJsselThe Netherlands
| | - W. A. Bemelman
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum (AMC)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Fecal diversion is an important tool in the surgical armamentarium. There is much controversy regarding which clinical scenarios warrant diversion. Throughout this article, we have analyzed the most recent literature and discussed the most common applications for the use of a diverting stoma. These include construction of diverting ileostomy or colostomy, ostomy for low colorectal/coloanal anastomosis, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease, and obstructing colorectal cancer. We conclude the following: diverting loop ileostomy is preferred to loop colostomy, an ostomy should be used for a pelvic anastomosis < 5 to 6 cm including coloanal anastomosis and ileo-anal-pouch anastomosis, severe perianal Crohn's disease frequently requires diversion, a primary anastomosis with diverting ileostomy in the setting of diverticular perforation is safe, and a diverting stoma can be used as a bridge to primary resection in the setting of an obstructing malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heidi Bahna
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.,University of Miami at JFK Medical Center, Atlantis, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rosenlund IM, Leivseth L, Førde OH, Revhaug A. Regional variation in hospitalizations and outpatient appointments for diverticular disease in Norway: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 53:1228-1235. [PMID: 30265178 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1506047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the use of specialized health care services for diverticular disease in different hospital referral regions in Norway. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nationwide cross-sectional study with data from the Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway. All Norwegian inhabitants aged 40 years and older in the years 2012-16 (2,517,938) were included. We obtained the rates (n/100,000 population) for hospitalizations, outpatient appointments, and surgery for diverticular disease for the population in each hospital referral region. We also quantified the use of lower gastrointestinal (LGI) endoscopy in hospitalizations and outpatient appointments for diverticular disease and the use of LGI endoscopy performed on any indication. RESULTS There were 131 hospitalizations and 381 outpatient appointments for diverticular disease per 100,000 population annually. Hospitalization rates varied 1.9-fold across regions from 94 to 175. Outpatient appointment rates varied 2.5-fold across regions from 258 to 655. Outpatient appointments were strongly correlated to hospitalizations (rs=0.75, p < .001) and outpatient LGI endoscopy for any indication (rs=0.67, p < .001). Hospitalization and surgery rates remained stable over the study period, while outpatient appointment rates increased by 37%. Concurrently, rates of outpatient LGI endoscopy performed on any indication increased by 35%. CONCLUSION There was considerable regional variation in both hospitalizations and outpatient appointments for diverticular disease. The extent of variation and the correlation with diagnostic intensity of LGI endoscopy indicate that the regional variation in health care utilization for diverticular disease to a large extent can be explained by regional differences in clinical practice rather than disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Linda Leivseth
- b Centre for Clinical Documentation and Evaluation , Northern Norway Regional Health Authority , Tromsø , Norway
| | - Olav Helge Førde
- b Centre for Clinical Documentation and Evaluation , Northern Norway Regional Health Authority , Tromsø , Norway.,c Department of Community Medicine , UiT The Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø , Norway
| | - Arthur Revhaug
- a Department of Clinical Medicine , UiT The Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø , Norway.,d Division of Surgery, Oncology and Women's health , University Hospital of North Norway , Tromsø , Norway
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wetterhall C, Mariusdottir E, Hall C, Jörgren F, Buchwald P. Low Incidence of Pelvic Sepsis after Hartmann's Procedure: Radiation Therapy May Be a Risk Factor. Gastrointest Tumors 2019; 5:77-81. [PMID: 30976578 DOI: 10.1159/000493526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Hartmann's procedure is a well-established alternative in colorectal surgery when a primary anastomosis is contraindicated. However, the rectal remnant may cause complications. This study was designed to investigate the occurrence of pelvic sepsis after Hartmann's procedure and identify possible risk factors. Methods All patients who underwent Hartmann's procedure between 2005 and 2012 were identified by the in-hospital registry. Information about pelvic sepsis and potential preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative risk factors was obtained by review of the medical records. Results 172 patients were identified (97 females); they were aged 74 ± 11 years. Surgery was performed due to cancer (49%) or diverticulitis (35%) and other benign disease (16%). Rectal transection was carried out anywhere between the pelvic floor and the promontory. Pelvic sepsis developed in 6.4% (11/172) of patients. Pelvic sepsis was associated with preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.03) and Hinchey grade III and IV (p = 0.02) in those patients who underwent Hartmann's procedure for diverticular disease. Conclusion Hartmann's procedure is a safe operation when an anastomosis is contraindicated since the incidence of pelvic sepsis is low. Preoperative radiotherapy and Hinchey grade III and IV may be risk factors for the development of pelvic sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmela Wetterhall
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Elin Mariusdottir
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Claire Hall
- Department of General Surgery, Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, United Kingdom
| | - Fredrik Jörgren
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, SUS Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bastiaenen VP, Hovdenak Jakobsen I, Labianca R, Martling A, Morton DG, Primrose JN, Tanis PJ, Laurberg S. Consensus and controversies regarding follow-up after treatment with curative intent of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: a synopsis of guidelines used in countries represented in the European Society of Coloproctology. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:392-416. [PMID: 30506553 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM It is common clinical practice to follow patients for a period of years after treatment with curative intent of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer, but follow-up strategies vary widely. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of recommendations on this topic in guidelines from member countries of the European Society of Coloproctology, with supporting evidence. METHOD A systematic search of Medline, Embase and the guideline databases Trip database, BMJ Best Practice and Guidelines International Network was performed. Quality assessment included use of the AGREE-II tool. All topics with recommendations from included guidelines were identified and categorized. For each subtopic, a conclusion was made followed by the degree of consensus and the highest level of evidence. RESULTS Twenty-one guidelines were included. The majority recommended that structured follow-up should be offered, except for patients in whom treatment of recurrence would be inappropriate. It was generally agreed that clinical visits, measurement of carcinoembryoinc antigen and liver imaging should be part of follow-up, based on a high level of evidence, although the frequency is controversial. There was also consensus on imaging of the chest and pelvis in rectal cancer, as well as endoscopy, based on lower levels of evidence and with a level of intensity that was contradictory. CONCLUSION In available guidelines, multimodal follow-up after treatment with curative intent of colorectal cancer is widely recommended, but the exact content and intensity are highly controversial. International agreement on the optimal follow-up schedule is unlikely to be achieved on current evidence, and further research should refocus on individualized 'patient-driven' follow-up and new biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V P Bastiaenen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - R Labianca
- Cancer Center, Ospedale Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - A Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D G Morton
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - J N Primrose
- University Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Laurberg
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Strate LL, Morris AM. Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment of Diverticulitis. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:1282-1298.e1. [PMID: 30660732 PMCID: PMC6716971 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 207] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Revised: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Diverticulitis is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder that is associated with significant morbidity and health care costs. Approximately 20% of patients with incident diverticulitis have at least 1 recurrence. Complications of diverticulitis, such as abdominal sepsis, are less likely to occur with subsequent events. Several risk factors, many of which are modifiable, have been identified including obesity, diet, and physical inactivity. Diet and lifestyle factors could affect risk of diverticulitis through their effects on the intestinal microbiome and inflammation. Preliminary studies have found that the composition and function of the gut microbiome differ between individuals with vs without diverticulitis. Genetic factors, as well as alterations in colonic neuromusculature, can also contribute to the development of diverticulitis. Less-aggressive and more-nuanced treatment strategies have been developed. Two multicenter, randomized trials of patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis found that antibiotics did not speed recovery or prevent subsequent complications. Elective surgical resection is no longer recommended solely based on number of recurrent events or young patient age and might not be necessary for some patients with diverticulitis complicated by abscess. Randomized trials of hemodynamically stable patients who require urgent surgery for acute, complicated diverticulitis that has not improved with antibiotics provide evidence to support primary anastomosis vs sigmoid colectomy with end colostomy. Despite these advances, more research is needed to increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of diverticulitis and to clarify treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa L Strate
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Arden M Morris
- S-SPIRE Center and Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schuster KM, Holena DN, Salim A, Savage S, Crandall M. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery guideline summaries 2018: acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, acute diverticulitis, acute pancreatitis, and small bowel obstruction. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2019; 4:e000281. [PMID: 31058240 PMCID: PMC6461136 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In April 2017, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) asked the AAST Patient Assessment Committee to undertake a gap analysis for published clinical practice guidelines in emergency general surgery (EGS). Committee members performed literature searches to catalogue published guidelines for common EGS diseases and also to identify gaps in the literature where guidelines could be created. For five of the most common EGS conditions, acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, acute diverticulitis, acute pancreatitis, and small bowel obstruction, we found multiple well-referenced guidelines published by leading professional organizations. We have summarized guideline recommendations for each of these disease states stratified by the AAST EGS anatomic severity score based on these published consensus guidelines. These summaries could be used to help inform evidence-based clinical decision-making, but are intended to be flexible and updatable in real time as further research emerges. Comprehensive guidelines were available for all of the diseases queried and identified gaps most commonly represented areas lacking a solid evidence base. These are therefore areas where further research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Schuster
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Daniel N Holena
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ali Salim
- Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephanie Savage
- Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Marie Crandall
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine–Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis is common. There is no consensus regarding the most appropriate management. Some authors have reported the efficacy and safety of observational management, and others have argued for a more aggressive approach with oral or intravenous antibiotic treatment. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to perform an updated meta-analysis of the different management strategies for uncomplicated diverticulitis with 2 separate meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were used. STUDY SELECTION All randomized clinical trials, prospective, and retrospective comparative studies were included. INTERVENTIONS Observational and antibiotics treatment or oral and intravenous antibiotics treatment were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Successful management (emergency management, recurrence, elective management) was measured. RESULTS After review of 293 identified records, 11 studies fit inclusion criteria: 7 studies compared observational management and antibiotics treatment (2321 patients), and 4 studies compared oral and intravenous antibiotics treatment (355 patients). There was no significant difference between observational management and antibiotics treatment in terms of emergency surgery (0.7% vs 1.4%; p = 0.1) and recurrence (11% vs 12%; p = 0.3). In this part, considering only randomized trials, elective surgery during the follow-up occurred more frequently in the observational group than the antibiotic group (2.5% vs 0.9%; p = 0.04). The second meta-analysis showed that failure and recurrence rates were similar between oral and intravenous antibiotics treatment (6% vs 7% (p = 0.6) and 8% vs 9% (p = 0.8)). LIMITATIONS Inclusion of nonrandomized studies, identification of high risks of bias (selection, performance, and detection bias), and presence of heterogeneity between the studies limited this work. CONCLUSIONS Observational management was not statistically different from antibiotic treatment for the primary outcome of needing to undergo surgery. However, in patients being treated by antibiotics, our studies demonstrated that oral administration was similar to intravenous administration and provided lower costs. Although it may be difficult for physicians to do, there is mounting evidence that not treating uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis with antibiotics is a viable treatment alternative.
Collapse
|
31
|
Ditzel M, Vennix S, Menon AG, Verbeek PC, Bemelman WA, Lange JF. Severity of Diverticulitis Does Not Influence Abdominal Complaints during Long-Term Follow-Up. Dig Surg 2019; 36:129-136. [PMID: 29428950 PMCID: PMC6482984 DOI: 10.1159/000486868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diverticulitis can lead to localized or generalized peritonitis and consequently induce abdominal adhesion formation. If adhesions would lead to abdominal complaints, it might be expected that these would be more prominent after operation for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis than after elective sigmoid resection. AIMS The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of abdominal complaints in the long-term after acute and elective surgery for diverticulitis. METHODS During the period 2003 through 2009, 269 patients were operated for diverticular disease. Two hundred eight of them were invited to fill out a questionnaire composed of the gastrointestinal quality of life index and additional questions and finally 109 were suitable for analysis with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years. RESULTS Analysis did not reveal any significant differences in the incidence of abdominal complaints or other parameters. CONCLUSION This retrospective study on patients after operation for diverticulitis shows that in the long term, the severity of the abdominal complaints is influenced neither by the stage of the disease nor by the fact of whether it was performed in an acute or elective setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Ditzel
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,*Max Ditzel, MD, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Diezestraat 8-II, NL–1078 JP Amsterdam (The Netherlands), E-Mail
| | - Sandra Vennix
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anand G. Menon
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Havenziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul C.M. Verbeek
- Department of Surgery, Flevohospital Almere, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A. Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan F. Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Havenziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bolkenstein HE, van Dijk ST, Consten ECJ, Heggelman BGF, Hoeks CMA, Broeders IAMJ, Boermeester MA, Draaisma WA. Conservative Treatment in Diverticulitis Patients with Pericolic Extraluminal Air and the Role of Antibiotic Treatment. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:2269-2276. [PMID: 30859428 PMCID: PMC6831527 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04153-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently published studies advocate a conservative approach with observation and antibiotic treatment in diverticulitis patients with pericolic air on computed tomography (CT). The primary aim of this study was to assess the clinical course of initially conservatively treated diverticulitis patients with isolated pericolic air and to identify risk factors for conservative treatment failure. The secondary aim was to assess the outcome of non-antibiotic treatment. METHODS Patient data from a retrospective cohort study on risk factors for complicated diverticulitis were combined with data from the DIABOLO trial, a randomised controlled trial comparing non-antibiotic with antibiotic treatment in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis. The present study identified all patients with Hinchey 1A diverticulitis with isolated pericolic air on CT. Pericolic air was defined as air located < 5 cm from the affected segment of colon. The primary outcome was failure of conservative management which was defined as need for percutaneous abscess drainage or emergency surgery within 30 days after presentation. A multivariable logistic regression of clinical, radiological and laboratorial parameters with respect to treatment failure was performed. RESULTS A total of 109 patients were included in the study. Fifty-two (48%) patients were treated with antibiotics. Nine (8%) patients failed conservative management, seven (13%) in the antibiotic treatment group and two (4%) in the non-antibiotic group (p = 0.083). Only (increased) CRP level at presentation was an independent predictor for treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS Conservative treatment in diverticulitis patients with isolated pericolic air is a suitable treatment strategy. Moreover, non-antibiotic treatment might be reasonable in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. E. Bolkenstein
- University of Twente, 5, Drienerlolaan, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands ,Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, 3800 BM Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - S. T. van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E. C. J. Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, 3800 BM Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - B. G. F. Heggelman
- Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - C. M. A. Hoeks
- Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. A. Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W. A. Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Azhar N, Kulstad H, Pålsson B, Kurt Schultz J, Lydrup ML, Buchwald P. Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis managed without antibiotics - difficult to introduce a new treatment protocol but few complications. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54:64-68. [PMID: 30650309 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1552987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Routine antibiotic treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) has been shown ineffective. In this study, the adherence to a new treatment protocol for uncomplicated diverticulitis was evaluated and the incidence of complications in patients treated with and without antibiotics was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study of in-patients diagnosed with AUD at Helsingborg Hospital, Sweden between 01 January 2013 and 06 January 2015 was performed. Antibiotics were routinely administrated until 01 May 2014. Thereafter, a new antibiotic-free treatment protocol for uncomplicated diverticulitis was introduced. All the patients were followed regarding complications for minimum one year. RESULTS A total of 50 patients were studied after the new protocol implementation and, 60% (n = 31) of the patients were treated without antibiotics. Specialists initiated antibiotic therapy significantly more often than registrars (p=.03). More patients in the antibiotic group had comorbidities (p=.03), apart from that, no significant differences in baseline characteristics were noted between treatment groups. Patients treated with antibiotics after introduction of the new protocol had significantly higher C-reactive protein than patients managed without antibiotics (median 117 mg/L vs. 70, p=.005). The hospital stay was shorter in the non-antibiotic group (three days vs. two days; p=.008). No significant differences in complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS Protocol compliance was lower than expected, indicating that implementation of new treatment regimens is challenging. This study confirms that complications are rare in AUD treated without antibiotics. However, the selection of the sickest patients to the treatment with antibiotics limits the interpretation of the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najia Azhar
- a Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Skåne University Hospital Malmö , Malmö, Sweden
| | - Hanna Kulstad
- b Department of Surgery , Helsingborg Hospital , Helsingborg , Sweden
| | - Birger Pålsson
- b Department of Surgery , Helsingborg Hospital , Helsingborg , Sweden
| | - Johannes Kurt Schultz
- c Department of Digestive Surgery , Akershus University Hospital , Lørenskog , Norway
| | - Marie-Louise Lydrup
- a Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Skåne University Hospital Malmö , Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- a Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Skåne University Hospital Malmö , Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Huston JM, Zuckerbraun BS, Moore LJ, Sanders JM, Duane TM. Antibiotics versus No Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis: Review of the Evidence and Future Directions. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2018; 19:648-654. [DOI: 10.1089/sur.2018.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jared M. Huston
- Departments of Surgery and Science Education, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York
| | - Brian S. Zuckerbraun
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Laura J. Moore
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
| | - James M. Sanders
- Department of Pharmacy and John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Therese M. Duane
- Department of Surgery, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Brandlhuber M. Radiologische Diagnostik der Sigmadivertikulitis und Stadieneinteilung. COLOPROCTOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s00053-018-0285-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
36
|
De Nardi P, Gazzetta P. Does inferior mesenteric artery ligation affect outcome in elective colonic resection for diverticular disease? ANZ J Surg 2018; 88:E778-E781. [PMID: 30062801 DOI: 10.1111/ans.14724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to analyse the role of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation during elective colonic resection for diverticular disease (DD) with respect to surgical outcome. METHODS All patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open colonic resection for DD from January 2006 to December 2012 were studied. The patients were divided into two groups based on IMA ligation or preservation. The primary end point was to compare anastomotic leakage in the two groups. The secondary end points were operative time, stoma formation, overall post-operative complications, restoration of bowel function and length of post-operative hospital stay. RESULTS During the study period, 219 elective colonic resections with primary anastomosis for DD were performed. A laparoscopic technique was employed in 132 (60.3%) cases. IMA ligation was performed in 66 patients (30.1%). Overall anastomotic leakage rate was 4.1%, 4.5% in IMA ligation and 3.9% in IMA preservation group, respectively (P = ns). Mean operative time was 225 ± 43.4 and 191 ± 41.7 min in IMA ligation and preservation group, respectively (P = 0.002). No differences were observed in the rate of overall complications, stoma formation, restoration of bowel function and post-operative length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS No differences were observed in surgical outcome in IMA ligation and preservation groups, particularly preservation or ligation of the IMA did not affect leakage rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola De Nardi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Gazzetta
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Acute diverticulitis is a common condition that has been increasing in incidence in the United States. It is associated with increasing age, but the pathophysiology of acute diverticulitis is still being elucidated. It is now believed to have a significant contribution from inflammatory processes rather than being a strictly infectious process. There are still many questions to be answered regarding the optimal management of acute diverticulitis because recent studies have challenged traditional practices, such as the routine use of antibiotics, surgical technique, and dietary restrictions for prevention of recurrence.
Collapse
|
38
|
van Dijk ST, Daniels L, Ünlü Ç, de Korte N, van Dieren S, Stockmann HB, Vrouenraets BC, Consten EC, van der Hoeven JA, Eijsbouts QA, Faneyte IF, Bemelman WA, Dijkgraaf MG, Boermeester MA. Long-Term Effects of Omitting Antibiotics in Uncomplicated Acute Diverticulitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113:1045-1052. [PMID: 29700480 DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0030-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditionally uncomplicated acute diverticulitis was routinely treated with antibiotics, although evidence for this strategy was lacking. Recently, two randomized clinical trials (AVOD trial and DIABOLO trial) published short-term results of omitting antibiotics compared to routine antibiotic treatment. Both showed no significant differences regarding recovery from the initial episode, as well as rates of complicated or recurrent diverticulitis and sigmoid resection. However, both studies showed a trend of higher rates of sigmoid resection in the observational groups. Here, the long-term effects of omitting antibiotics in first episode uncomplicated acute diverticulitis were assessed. METHODS A total of 528 patients with CT-proven, primary, left-sided, uncomplicated acute diverticulitis were randomized to either an observational or an antibiotic treatment strategy (DIABOLO trial). Outcome measures were complicated diverticulitis, recurrent diverticulitis and sigmoid resection at 24 months' follow up. Differences between the groups were explored and risk factors were identified using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Complete case analyses showed no difference in rates of recurrent diverticulitis (15.4% in the observational group versus 14.9% in the antibiotic group; p = 0.885), complicated diverticulitis (4.8% versus 3.3%; p = 0.403) and sigmoid resection (9.0% versus. 5.0%; p = 0.085). Young patients (<50 years) and patients with a pain score at presentation of 8 or higher on a visual analogue pain scale were at risk for complicated or recurrent diverticulitis. In this multivariable analysis, treatment type (with or without antibiotics) was not an independent predictor for complicated or recurrent diverticulitis. CONCLUSION Omitting antibiotics in the treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis did not result in more complicated diverticulitis, recurrent diverticulitis or sigmoid resections at long-term follow up. As the DIABOLO trial was not powered for these secondary outcome measures, some uncertainty remains whether (small) non-significant differences could be true associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S T van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - L Daniels
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Ç Ünlü
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - N de Korte
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - S van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - H B Stockmann
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - B C Vrouenraets
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - E C Consten
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - J A van der Hoeven
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Q A Eijsbouts
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - I F Faneyte
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - M G Dijkgraaf
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - M A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Department of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, Netherlands. Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Meander Medical Centre, Hoogland, Amersfoort, Netherlands. Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Emile SH, Elfeki H, Sakr A, Shalaby M. Management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis without antibiotics: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of predictors of treatment failure. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22:499-509. [PMID: 29980885 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1817-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diverticulitis is a common complication of diverticular disease of the colon. While complicated diverticulitis often warrants intervention, acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) is usually managed conservatively. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conservative treatment of AUD without antibiotics compared to standard antibiotic treatment. METHODS A systematic literature review in compliance with PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched. Studies that assessed efficacy and safety of treatment of AUD without antibiotics were included. Outcome parameters were rates of treatment failure, recurrence of diverticulitis, complications and mortality, readmission to hospital, and need for surgery. RESULTS Nine studies including 2565 patients were included to the review. Of these patients, 65.1% were treated conservatively without antibiotics. Treatment failure was observed in 5.1% of patients not-given-antibiotic treatment versus 3.4% of those given antibiotic treatment. Recurrent diverticulitis occurred in 9.3% of patients in the non-antibiotic group versus 12.1% of patients in the antibiotic group. On meta-analysis of the studies, there were no significant differences between non-antibiotic and antibiotic treatment groups regarding rates of treatment failure (OR = 1.5, p = 0.06), recurrence of diverticulitis (OR = 0.81, p = 0.2), complications (OR = 0.56, p = 0.25), readmission rates (OR = 0.97, p = 0.91), need for surgery (OR = 0.59, p = 0.28), and mortality (OR = 0.64, p = 0.47). The only variable that was significantly associated with treatment failure in the non-antibiotic treatment group was associated comorbidities (standard error (SE) = - 0.07, 95% CI - 0.117 - 0.032; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Treatment of AUD without antibiotics is feasible, safe, and effective. Adding broad-spectrum antibiotics to the treatment regimen did not serve to decrease treatment failure, recurrence, complications, hospital readmissions, and need for surgery significantly compared to non-antibiotic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S H Emile
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura City, Egypt.
| | - H Elfeki
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura City, Egypt
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - A Sakr
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura City, Egypt
| | - M Shalaby
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura City, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Knott L, Reickert CA. Medical Management of Diverticular Disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2018; 31:214-216. [PMID: 29942209 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the current literature supporting the non-surgical options for treatment in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, complicated diverticulitis, and options for prevention of recurrent diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam Knott
- Department of General Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Craig A Reickert
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kandagatla PG, Stefanou AJ. Current Status of the Radiologic Assessment of Diverticular Disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2018; 31:217-220. [PMID: 29942210 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Radiologic assessment plays a vital role in the management of diverticulitis. It not only helps in the diagnosis, but also helps to guide the management. As technology has progressed, different modalities have offered insight into the treatment of this disease process. Through various trials and studies, certain modalities stand above the rest in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Computed tomography (CT) imaging has also proved to help us guide the management through a grading system. Newer studies show us the advantages of other modalities such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Though there is much research yet to be done with these modalities, they do show a lot of potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pridvi G Kandagatla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Amalia J Stefanou
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Scarpignato C, Barbara G, Lanas A, Strate LL. Management of colonic diverticular disease in the third millennium: Highlights from a symposium held during the United European Gastroenterology Week 2017. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2018; 11:1756284818771305. [PMID: 29844795 PMCID: PMC5964860 DOI: 10.1177/1756284818771305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Diverticulosis is a common anatomical condition, which appears to be age-dependent. Individuals who develop chronic gastrointestinal symptoms or complications are referred to as having diverticular disease. Although the diagnosis of this condition can be relatively straightforward, randomized controlled trials are scarce and management often follows tradition rather than principles of evidence-based medicine. This report deals with the topics discussed during a symposium held during the United European Gastroenterology Week (Barcelona, October 2017). During the meeting, the role of dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of diverticular disease and its treatment were thoroughly discussed, by examining the efficacy and mechanisms of action of the currently used drugs. Recent studies have shown the presence of dysbiosis in patients with diverticular disease and suggest an imbalance in favor of bacteria with pro-inflammatory and pathogenetic potential. These microbiota changes correlate with mucosal immune activation, mirrored by a marked increase of macrophages in colonic mucosa, both in the diverticular region and at distant sites. The low-grade inflammation, driven by bacteria-induced immune activation, could be involved in the pathophysiology of symptoms. As a consequence, pharmacological approaches targeting enteric bacteria (with poorly absorbed antibiotics, like rifaximin, or probiotics) or intestinal inflammation (with 5-ASA derivatives or rifaximin) have shown capability of controlling symptoms and also preventing complications, albeit more research is needed to establish the optimal regimen (daily dose and duration) of therapy. Well-designed randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), including homogeneous populations of patients, are therefore needed. The future of management of many GI diseases, including symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, will rely on the so-called 'microbiota-directed therapies'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giovanni Barbara
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angel Lanas
- Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Lisa L. Strate
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Polese L, Bressan A, Savarino E, Vecchiato M, Turoldo A, Frigo A, Sturniolo GC, De Manzini N, Petri R, Merigliano S. Quality of life after laparoscopic sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticular disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018. [PMID: 29525902 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3005-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aimed to evaluate the QoL in patients who underwent elective surgery for uncomplicated diverticulitis using a recently developed diverticulitis quality of life questionnaire (DV-QoL). METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent surgery for uncomplicated diverticulitis or who were hospitalized and treated conservatively for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis episodes in three referral centers, in a 5-year period, were included in the study. The 36-Item Short Form Survey and the DV-QoL were administered to the patients to assess their QoL before and after treatment of diverticular disease. RESULTS Ninety-seven patients who underwent surgery, 44 patients who were treated conservatively, and 44 healthy volunteers were included in the study. DV-QoL scores correlated with SF-36 scores (p < 0.0001). The surgically treated patients reported a worse quality of life before treatment with respect to the patients treated conservatively (mean 21.12 surgical vs 15.41 conservative, p = 0.0048). The surgically treated patients presented better post-treatment global scores with respect to the conservatively treated patients (mean: 6.90 surgical vs 10.61 conservative, p = 0.0186). Covariance analysis confirmed that the differences between the pre- and post-treatment DV-QoL scores were significantly higher in the surgical (p = 0.0002) with respect to the non-surgical patients. As far as single items were concerned, differences between the two groups were found in the pre- and post-treatment "concerns" and "behavioral changes" DV-QoL items. CONCLUSIONS Sigmoidectomy reduces concerns about diverticulitis and behavioral changes due to the disease. Quality of life should be considered when referring patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis to surgery. Prospective studies are required to confirm this result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lino Polese
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University, Padova, Italy. .,Clinica Chirurgica 3^, Policlinico Universitario, sesto piano. Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
| | - Alice Bressan
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - Massimo Vecchiato
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Angelo Turoldo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Annachiara Frigo
- Department of Cardiology, Chest and Vascular Surgery, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Nicolò De Manzini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Roberto Petri
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Stefano Merigliano
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Isacson D, Andreasson K, Nikberg M, Smedh K, Chabok A. Outpatient management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis results in health-care cost savings. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018. [PMID: 29543100 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1448887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Outpatient management without antibiotics has been shown to be safe for selected patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on admissions, complication rates and health-care costs of the policy of outpatient treatment without using antibiotics. METHODS The medical records of all patients diagnosed with AUD in the year before (2011) and after (2014) the implementation of outpatient management without antibiotics in Västmanland County were reviewed. Health-care cost analysis was performed using the Swedish cost-per-patient model. RESULTS In total, 494 episodes of AUD were identified, 254 in 2011 and 240 in 2014. The proportion of patients managed as outpatients was 20% in 2011 compared with 60% in 2014 (p < .001). There were 203 hospital admissions and a total length of stay of 677 days in 2011 compared with 95 admissions and 344 days in 2014 (both p < .001). The total health-care cost was €558,679 in 2011 compared with €370,370 in 2014 (p < .001). Three patients developed complications in 2011 and four in 2014 (p = .469). CONCLUSIONS The new policy of outpatient management without antibiotics in routine health care almost halved the total health-care cost without an increase in the complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Isacson
- a Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Västerås , Sweden
| | - Karl Andreasson
- a Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Västerås , Sweden
| | - Maziar Nikberg
- a Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Västerås , Sweden
| | - Kenneth Smedh
- a Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Västerås , Sweden
| | - Abbas Chabok
- a Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Västerås , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Achkasov SI, Shelygin YA, Moskalev AI, Trubacheva YL, Senashenko SA. [Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted procedures for chronic complications of diverticular disease]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2018:16-23. [PMID: 29560954 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2018316-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM To estimate efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted procedures for chronic complications of diverticular disease (DD). MATERIAL AND METHODS It was made a prospective comparative study within 2007-2015. Inclusion criteria were verified chronic DD (>6 weeks after the first attack) and bowel resection followed by primary anastomosis. EXCLUSION CRITERIA contraindications for pneumoperitoneum, BMI ≥35 kg/m2, infiltrate dimension >10 cm, preoperatively non-excluded neoplasm. RESULTS 233 patients with chronic DD underwent elective surgery, 136 (58.4%) of them were included in the study. There were 80 (58.8%) females aged 57.2±6.2 (24-83) years. Main group consisted of 75 patients after laparoscopic-assisted procedures, 61 were in control group (open ones). Both groups were homogeneous in age, gender, BMI, type of chronic complications, extent of inflammation, extent of bowel resection, surgery time (211.1 vs 206.3 min; p=0.16), incidence of preventive stoma (12.9 vs 19.7%; p=0.32) and complications rate (10.7 vs 14.7%; p=0.47). Maximal time of surgery was noted in case of chronic abdominal mass with statistically significance for main group (240.0±12.2 min vs 207.6±13.7 min; р=0.01). Conversion rate was 12.0% in main group. Main group showed significant higher rate of stapler anastomoses (66.7 vs 22.9%; р<0.0001), less intraoperative blood loss (100 ml vs 350 ml; р=0.001). Early postoperative period was significantly shorter in main group (9.5±0.4 days vs 12.9±1.2 days, р=0.02). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic-assisted procedures for diverticular disease are associated with more favorable early postoperative period with the same complication rate. Technical complexity and operative time depend on the extent of pelvic inflammatory changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S I Achkasov
- Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yu A Shelygin
- Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - A I Moskalev
- Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yu L Trubacheva
- Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - S A Senashenko
- Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mora López L, Flores Clotet R, Serra Aracil X, Montes Ortega N, Navarro Soto S. The use of the modified Neff classification in the management of acute diverticulitis. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2018; 109:328-334. [PMID: 28376628 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4738/2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acute diverticulitis (AD) is increasingly seen in Emergency services. The application of a reliable classification is vital for its safe and effective management. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the combined use of the modified Neff radiological classification (mNeff) and clinical criteria (systemic inflammatory response syndrome [SIRS] and comorbidity) can ensure safe management of AD. MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospective descriptive study in a population of patients diagnosed with AD by computerized tomography (CT). The protocol applied consisted in the application of the mNeff classification and clinical criteria of SIRS and comorbidity to guide the choice of outpatient treatment, admission, drainage or surgery. RESULTS The study was carried out from February 2010 to February 2016. A total of 590 episodes of AD were considered: 271 women and 319 men, with a median age of 60 years (range: 25-92 years). mNeff grades were as follows: grade 0 (408 patients 70.6%); 376/408 (92%) were considered for home treatment; of these 376 patients, 254 (67.5%) were discharged and controlled by the Home Hospitalization Unit; 33 returned to the Emergency Room for consultation and 22 were re-admitted; the success rate was 91%. Grade Ia (52, 8.9%): 31/52 (59.6%) were considered for outpatient treatment; of these 31 patients, 11 (35.5%) were discharged; eight patients returned to the Emergency Room for consultation and five were re-admitted. Grade Ib (49, 8.5%): five surgery and two drainage. Grade II (30, 5.2%): ten surgery and four drainage. Grade III (5, 0.9%): one surgery and one drainage. Grade IV (34, 5.9%): ten patients showed good evolution with conservative treatment. Of the 34 grade IV patients, 24 (70.6%) underwent surgery, and three (8.8%) received percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSIONS The mNeff classification is a safe, easy-to-apply classification based on CT findings. Together with clinical data and comorbidity data, it allows better management of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Mora López
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, ESPAÑA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Galetin T, Galetin A, Vestweber KH, Rink AD. Systematic review and comparison of national and international guidelines on diverticular disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:261-272. [PMID: 29349481 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2960-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Diverticular disease is common and of increasing medical and economical importance. Various practice guidelines on diagnostic and treatment on this disease exist. We compared current guidelines on the disease in order to identify concordant and discordant recommendations. METHOD Eleven national and international guidelines on diverticular disease published over the last 10 years have been identified by a systematic literature review on PubMed and compared in detail for 20 main and 51 subtopics. RESULTS The available evidence for the most aspects was rated as moderate or low. There was concordance for the following items: Diagnosis of diverticulitis should be confirmed by imaging methods (10 of 10 guidelines). Mild forms may be treated out-patient (10/10). Abscesses are treated non-surgically (9/9). Elective surgery should be indicated by individual patient-related factors, only, and be performed laparoscopically (10/10, 9/9 respectively). Main differences were found in the questions of appropriate classification, imaging diagnostic (computed-tomography versus ultra-sound), need for antibiotics in out-patient treatment and mode of surgery for diverticular perforation. Despite growing evidence that antibiotics are not needed for treating mild diverticulitis, only 3/10 guidelines have corresponding recommendations. Hartmann's procedure has been abandoned several years ago and is now recommended for feculent peritonitis by the three most recent guidelines. In contrast, laparoscopic lavage without resection is not recommended anymore. CONCLUSION There are dissents in the recommendations for central aspects regarding the diagnostic and treatment of diverticular disease in recently published guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Galetin
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Leverkusen General Hospital, Am Gesundheitspark 11, 51375, Leverkusen, Germany.
| | - A Galetin
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Leverkusen General Hospital, Am Gesundheitspark 11, 51375, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - K-H Vestweber
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Leverkusen General Hospital, Am Gesundheitspark 11, 51375, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - A D Rink
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Leverkusen General Hospital, Am Gesundheitspark 11, 51375, Leverkusen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lambrichts DPV, Birindelli A, Tonini V, Cirocchi R, Cervellera M, Lange JF, Bemelman WA, Di Saverio S. The Multidisciplinary Management of Acute Complicated Diverticulitis. Inflamm Intest Dis 2018; 3:80-90. [PMID: 30733952 DOI: 10.1159/000486677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) is an important and increasing issue in Western countries that leads to a significant impact and burden for patients, but also for the society due to its effects on hospital costs. In recent years, essential progression has been made regarding the research and implementation of novel or improved treatment strategies for the various disease entities of ACD. Much debated topics in the multidisciplinary approach of patients with ACD, such as the choice for nonoperative treatment options, the role of percutaneous drainage for diverticular abscesses, the role of laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis, and the role of sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for patients with perforated diverticulitis, require clinicians to attentively follow and participate in these discussions. SUMMARY The aim of this review article is to provide clinicians with a structured overview of the recent literature on the multidisciplinary management of complicated diverticulitis by a panel of experts on the topic. By performing an extensive literature search in the online medical databases MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase, insights into nonoperative treatment, percutaneous drainage, minimally invasive and open surgical treatment of ACD are provided. Furthermore, a comprehensive algorithm for the treatment of ACD has been developed. KEY MESSAGES Accurate patient evaluation and selection based on patient and disease characteristics is of paramount importance to determine the appropriate treatment strategy for patients with complicated diverticulitis. The presence of an experienced surgeon with advanced skills in laparoscopic emergency colorectal surgery is crucial for the treatment of patients with perforated diverticulitis in order to properly evaluate, select and treat patients suitable for nonoperative or operative treatment with an open or laparoscopic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniël P V Lambrichts
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arianna Birindelli
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Emergency Surgery Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.,Queen Elizabeth University Hospital NHS, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Valeria Tonini
- Emergency Surgery Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Cervellera
- Emergency Surgery Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Johan F Lange
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Department of Surgery, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.,Havenziekenhuis, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Coble JL, Sheldon KE, Yue F, Salameh TJ, Harris LR, Deiling S, Ruggiero FM, Eshelman MA, Yochum GS, Koltun WA, Gerhard GS, Broach JR. Identification of a rare LAMB4 variant associated with familial diverticulitis through exome sequencing. Hum Mol Genet 2018; 26:3212-3220. [PMID: 28595269 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddx204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Diverticulitis is a chronic disease of the colon in which diverticuli, or outpouching through the colonic wall, become inflamed. Although recent observations suggest that genetic factors may play a significant role in diverticulitis, few genes have yet been implicated in disease pathogenesis and familial cases are uncommon. Here, we report results of whole exome sequencing performed on members from a single multi-generational family with early onset diverticulitis in order to identify a genetic component of the disease. We identified a rare single nucleotide variant in the laminin β 4 gene (LAMB4) that segregated with disease in a dominant pattern and causes a damaging missense substitution (D435N). Targeted sequencing of LAMB4 in 148 non-familial and unrelated sporadic diverticulitis patients identified two additional rare variants in the gene. Immunohistochemistry indicated that LAMB4 localizes to the myenteric plexus of colonic tissue and patients harboring LAMB4 variants exhibited reduced LAMB4 protein levels relative to controls. Laminins are constituents of the extracellular matrix and play a major role in regulating the development and function of the enteric nervous system. Reduced LAMB4 levels may therefore alter innervation and morphology of the enteric nervous system, which may contribute to colonic dysmotility associated with diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel L Coble
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
| | | | - Feng Yue
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
| | | | | | - Sue Deiling
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery
| | - Francesca M Ruggiero
- Division of Anatomical Pathology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | | | - Gregory S Yochum
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.,Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery
| | | | - Glenn S Gerhard
- Department of Medical Genetics and Molecular Biochemistry, Temple University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Tandon A, Fretwell VL, Nunes QM, Rooney PS. Antibiotics versus no antibiotics in the treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:179-188. [PMID: 29323778 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 12/30/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) is common and antibiotics are the cornerstone of traditional conservative management. This approach lacks clear evidence base and studies have recently suggested that avoidance of antibiotics is a safe and efficacious way to manage AUD. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the safety and efficacy of treating AUD without antibiotics. METHODS A systematic search of Embase, Cochrane library, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and ClinicalTrials. gov was performed. Studies comparing antibiotics versus no antibiotics in the treatment of AUD were included. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model with the primary outcome measure being diverticulitis-associated complications. Secondary outcomes were readmission rate, diverticulitis recurrence, mean hospital stay, requirement for surgery and requirement for percutaneous drainage. RESULTS Eight studies were included involving 2469 patients; 1626 in the non-antibiotic group (NAb) and 843 in the antibiotic group (Ab). There was a higher complication rate in the Ab group however this was not significant (1.9% versus 2.6%) with a combined risk ratio (RR) of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.25 to 1.57, p=0.32). There was a shorter mean length of hospital stay in the Nab group (standard mean difference of -1.18 (95% CI, -2.34 to -0.03 p= 0.04). There was no significant difference in readmission, recurrence and surgical intervention rate or requirement for percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSION Treatment of AUD without antibiotics may be feasible with outcomes that are comparable to antibiotic treatment and with potential benefits for patients and the NHS. Large scale randomised multicentre studies are needed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashutosh Tandon
- Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL
| | | | - Quentin M Nunes
- Royal Liverpool Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- NIHR Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Liverpool, Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine University of Liverpool, 5th Floor UCD, c/o The Duncan Building, Daulby Street, Liverpool, L69 3GA
| | - Paul S Rooney
- Royal Liverpool Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|