1
|
Ammirati CA, Passera R, Beltrami E, Peluso C, Francis N, Arezzo A. Laparoscopic and robotic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. MINIM INVASIV THER 2024; 33:253-269. [PMID: 38946054 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2360094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As life expectancy has been increasing, older patients are becoming more central to the healthcare system, leading to more intensive care use and longer hospital stays. Nevertheless, advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques offer safe and effective options for older patients with colorectal diseases. This study aims to provide comprehensive evidence on the role of minimally invasive surgery in treating colorectal diseases in older patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS All articles directly compared the minimally invasive approach with open surgery in patients aged ≥65 years. The present metanalysis took 30-day complications as primary outcomes. Length of hospital stay, readmission, and 30-day mortality were also assessed, as secondary outcomes. Further subgroup analyses were carried out based on surgery setting, lesion features, and location. RESULTS After searching the main databases, 84 articles were included. Evaluation of 30-day complications rate, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality significantly favored minimally invasive approaches. The outcome readmission did not show any significant difference. CONCLUSIONS The current metanalysis demonstrates clear advantages of minimally invasive techniques over open surgery in colorectal procedures for older patients, particularly in reducing complications, mortality, and hospitalization. This suggests that prioritizing these techniques, based on available expertise and facilities, could improve outcomes and quality of care for older patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roberto Passera
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Elsa Beltrami
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Chiara Peluso
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Nader Francis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital Foundation Trust, Yeovil, UK
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keller DS, Curtis N, Burt HA, Ammirati CA, Collings AT, Polk HC, Carrano FM, Antoniou SA, Hanna N, Piotet LM, Hill S, Cuijpers ACM, Tejedor P, Milone M, Andriopoulou E, Kontovounisios C, Leeds IL, Awad ZT, Barber MW, Al-Mansour M, Nassif G, West MA, Pryor AD, Carli F, Demartines N, Bouvy ND, Passera R, Arezzo A, Francis N. EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4104-4126. [PMID: 38942944 PMCID: PMC11289045 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the population ages, more older adults are presenting for surgery. Age-related declines in physiological reserve and functional capacity can result in frailty and poor outcomes after surgery. Hence, optimizing perioperative care in older patients is imperative. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) may influence surgical outcomes, but current use and impact on older adults patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations on perioperative care of older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS Expert consensus determined working definitions for key terms and metrics related to perioperative care. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for 24 pre-defined key questions in the topic areas of prehabilitation, MIS, and ERAS in major abdominal surgery (colorectal, upper gastrointestinal (UGI), Hernia, and hepatopancreatic biliary (HPB)) to generate evidence-based recommendations following the GRADE methodology. RESULT Older adults were defined as 65 years and older. Over 20,000 articles were initially retrieved from search parameters. Evidence synthesis was performed across the three topic areas from 172 studies, with meta-analyses conducted for MIS and ERAS topics. The use of MIS and ERAS was recommended for older adult patients particularly when undergoing colorectal surgery. Expert opinion recommended prehabilitation, cessation of smoking and alcohol, and correction of anemia in all colorectal, UGI, Hernia, and HPB procedures in older adults. All recommendations were conditional, with low to very low certainty of evidence, with the exception of ERAS program in colorectal surgery. CONCLUSIONS MIS and ERAS are recommended in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery, with evidence supporting use in colorectal surgery. Though expert opinion supported prehabilitation, there is insufficient evidence supporting use. This work has identified evidence gaps for further studies to optimize older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah S Keller
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FR, USA
| | - Nathan Curtis
- Surgical Unit, Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester, Dorset, UK
| | | | | | - Amelia T Collings
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Hiram C Polk
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Busto Arsizio Circolo Hospital, ASST-Valle Olona, Varese, Italy
| | - Stavros A Antoniou
- Department of General Surgery, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nader Hanna
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sarah Hill
- Department of Surgery, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Anne C M Cuijpers
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Tejedor
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical and Surgical Gastrointestinal Diseases, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy
| | - Eleni Andriopoulou
- Department of Surgery, Hellenic Red Cross Korgialeneio Benakeio NHS, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Campus and the Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ira L Leeds
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ziad T Awad
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Meghan Wandtke Barber
- Department of Surgery, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Mazen Al-Mansour
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - George Nassif
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Malcolm A West
- Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Complex Cancer and Exenterative Service, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Aurora D Pryor
- Long Island Jewish Medical Center and System Chief for Bariatric Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA
| | - Franco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Nicole D Bouvy
- Innovative Surgical Techniques, Endoscopic and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roberto Passera
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Nader Francis
- Department of Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, UK.
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital, Y Block, Watford Rd, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Podda M, Sylla P, Baiocchi G, Adamina M, Agnoletti V, Agresta F, Ansaloni L, Arezzo A, Avenia N, Biffl W, Biondi A, Bui S, Campanile FC, Carcoforo P, Commisso C, Crucitti A, De'Angelis N, De'Angelis GL, De Filippo M, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Ercolani G, Fraga GP, Gabrielli F, Gaiani F, Guerrieri M, Guttadauro A, Kluger Y, Leppaniemi AK, Loffredo A, Meschi T, Moore EE, Ortenzi M, Pata F, Parini D, Pisanu A, Poggioli G, Polistena A, Puzziello A, Rondelli F, Sartelli M, Smart N, Sugrue ME, Tejedor P, Vacante M, Coccolini F, Davies J, Catena F. Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:35. [PMID: 34215310 PMCID: PMC8254305 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00378-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Although rectal cancer is predominantly a disease of older patients, current guidelines do not incorporate optimal treatment recommendations for the elderly and address only partially the associated specific challenges encountered in this population. This results in a wide variation and disparity in delivering a standard of care to this subset of patients. As the burden of rectal cancer in the elderly population continues to increase, it is crucial to assess whether current recommendations on treatment strategies for the general population can be adopted for the older adults, with the same beneficial oncological and functional outcomes. This multidisciplinary experts' consensus aims to refine current rectal cancer-specific guidelines for the elderly population in order to help to maximize rectal cancer therapeutic strategies while minimizing adverse impacts on functional outcomes and quality of life for these patients. METHODS The discussion among the steering group of clinical experts and methodologists from the societies' expert panel involved clinicians practicing in general surgery, colorectal surgery, surgical oncology, geriatric oncology, geriatrics, gastroenterologists, radiologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and endoscopists. Research topics and questions were formulated, revised, and unanimously approved by all experts in two subsequent modified Delphi rounds in December 2020-January 2021. The steering committee was divided into nine teams following the main research field of members. Each conducted their literature search and drafted statements and recommendations on their research question. Literature search has been updated up to 2020 and statements and recommendations have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. A modified Delphi methodology was implemented to reach agreement among the experts on all statements and recommendations. CONCLUSIONS The 2021 SICG-SIFIPAC-SICE-WSES consensus for the multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer aims to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: epidemiology, pre-intervention strategies, diagnosis and staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgery, watch and wait strategy, adjuvant chemotherapy, synchronous liver metastases, and emergency presentation of rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- ASST Cremona, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Winterthur - University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, AULSS2 Trevigiana del Veneto, Vittorio Veneto, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- 1st General Surgery Unit, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Nicola Avenia
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Biondi
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Simona Bui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio C Campanile
- Department of Surgery, ASL VT - Ospedale "San Giovanni Decollato - Andosilla", Civita Castellana, Italy
| | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Claudia Commisso
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Antonio Crucitti
- General and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Cristo Re Hospital and Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola De'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, Regional General Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Gian Luigi De'Angelis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint Germain en Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | | | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Federica Gaiani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | | | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ari K Leppaniemi
- Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrea Loffredo
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Tiziana Meschi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma Geriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, USA
| | | | | | - Dario Parini
- Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Adolfo Pisanu
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gilberto Poggioli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Pietro Valdoni Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza Università degli Studi di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Puzziello
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | - Michael E Sugrue
- Letterkenny University Hospital and CPM sEUBP Interreg Project, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | | | - Marco Vacante
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goto K, Watanabe J, Suwa Y, Nakagawa K, Suwa H, Ozawa M, Ishibe A, Ota M, Kunisaki C, Endo I. A multicenter, propensity score-matched cohort study about short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1287-1295. [PMID: 33575889 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03871-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated the results of laparoscopic surgery (LAP) compared to open surgery (OP) for locally advanced mid-to-lower rectal cancer. METHODS From February 2008 to December 2014, we collected patient data with clinical stage II/III mid-to-lower rectal cancer who underwent resection with LAP or OP at 13 institutions associated with the Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG). The short-term outcomes and long-term prognoses associated with LAP and OP were analyzed after adjusting for the patients' backgrounds using propensity score matching. RESULTS Among 1091 eligible cases, a propensity score matching with six covariates-age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status category, tumor location, and clinical stage-extracted 237 cases each for the LAP and OP groups, respectively. After matching, there were no differences in background factors between the two groups except for the presence or absence of preoperative treatment. Operative time was significantly longer in the LAP group than that in the OP group (p < 0.001), while the amount of bleeding and the length of postoperative hospital stay were significantly lower in the LAP group than that in the OP group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of postoperative complications. The 3-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates were 90.5% and 88.6% and 78.3% and 71.6% in the LAP and OP groups, respectively, which did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS The short-term outcomes and long-term prognoses of LAP in this cohort study indicated that LAP could be a therapeutic option for locally advanced rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN000040406.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koki Goto
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Jun Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Suwa
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kazuya Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Suwa
- Department of Surgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan
| | - Mayumi Ozawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ishibe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Mitsuyoshi Ota
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Chikara Kunisaki
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tan KL, Deng HJ, Chen ZQ, Mou TY, Liu H, Xie RS, Liang XM, Fan XH, Li GX. Survival outcomes following laparoscopic vs open surgery for non-metastatic rectal cancer: a two-center cohort study with propensity score matching. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2020; 8:319-325. [PMID: 32843980 PMCID: PMC7434561 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goaa046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND?> Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is commonly performed in China. However, compared with open surgery, the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery, especially the long-term survival, has not been sufficiently proved. METHODS?> Data of eligible patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer at Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University and Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine between 2012 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Long-term survival outcomes and short-term surgical safety were analysed with propensity score matching between groups. RESULTS Of 430 cases collated from two institutes, 103 matched pairs were analysed after propensity score matching. The estimated blood loss during laparoscopic surgery was significantly less than that during open surgery (P = 0.019) and the operative time and hospital stay were shorter in the laparoscopic group (both P < 0.001). The post-operative complications rate was 9.7% in the laparoscopic group and 10.7% in the open group (P = 0.818). No significant difference was observed between the laparoscopic group and the open group in the 5-year overall survival rate (75.7% vs 80.6%, P = 0.346), 5-year relapse-free survival rate (74.8% vs 76.7%, P = 0.527), or 5-year cancer-specific survival rate (79.6% vs 87.4%, P = 0.219). An elevated carcinoembryonic antigen, <12 harvested lymph nodes, and perineural invasion were independent prognostic factors affecting overall survival and relapse-free survival. CONCLUSIONS?> Our findings suggest that open surgery should still be the priority recommendation, but laparoscopic surgery is also an acceptable treatment for non-metastatic rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang-Lian Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Abdominal Pain Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Hai-Jun Deng
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Chen
- Abdominal Pain Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Ting-Yu Mou
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Run-Sheng Xie
- Abdominal Pain Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Xue-Min Liang
- Abdominal Pain Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Hua Fan
- Abdominal Pain Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Guo-Xin Li
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Harten MJ, Greenwood EB, Bedrikovetski S, Dudi-Venkata NN, Hunter RA, Kroon HM, Sammour T. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA). Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1649-1655. [PMID: 32312590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced age is associated with worse outcomes after open rectal cancer surgery. However, not much is known about outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the elderly. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of MIS in elderly rectal cancer patients using the Bi-national Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) data from Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). METHODS 3451 patients were included, divided into three groups: <50 years (n = 364), 50-74 years (n = 2157) and ≥75 years (n = 930). Propensity-score matching was performed for the elderly group analysis to correct for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS MIS was performed in 52.9% of elderly patients, slightly lower than rates in <50 year and 50-74 year old groups (61% and 55.5%, respectively, p = 0.022). Elderly patients had more postoperative complications (p < 0.0001) and had a longer length of hospital stay (LOS; median 11 vs. 8 days for both other groups; p < 0.0001). Elderly patients had higher (y)pT-stages compared to both other groups (p < 0.0001) and were less likely to receive adjuvant therapy (p < 0.0001). Propensity-score matched analysis of the elderly group showed a higher rate of superficial wound dehiscence and a longer LOS after open surgery compared to MIS (10.3% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.030; 12 days vs. 9.5 days, p = 0.001, respectively), with comparable short-term oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS MIS is performed in just over half of elderly rectal cancer patients who are selected for elective rectal resection surgery in ANZ. When performed in the elderly, MIS appears safe and is associated with fewer wound complications and a shorter LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meike J van Harten
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Emma B Greenwood
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Science, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nagendra N Dudi-Venkata
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Science, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ronald A Hunter
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Science, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Science, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Large, Multicenter, Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study in Japan. Ann Surg 2019. [PMID: 28628565 PMCID: PMC6092102 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is widely performed all over the world and several randomized controlled trials have been reported. However, the usefulness of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery has not been demonstrated sufficiently, especially for the low rectal area. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that laparoscopic primary tumor resection is safe and effective when compared with the open approach for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Data from patients with clinical stage II to III low rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection were collected and analyzed. The operations were performed from 2010 to 2011. Short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis were analyzed with propensity score matching. Results: Of 1608 cases collated from 69 institutes, 1500 cases were eligible for analysis. The cases were matched into 482 laparoscopic and 482 open cases. The mean height of the tumor from the anal verge was 4.6 cm. Preoperative treatment was performed in 35% of the patients. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was 5.2%. Estimated blood loss during laparoscopic surgery was significantly less than that during open surgery (90 vs 625 mL, P < 0.001). Overall, the occurrence of complications after laparoscopic surgeries was less than that after open surgeries (30.3% vs 39.2%, P = 0.005). Three-year overall survival rates were 89.9% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 86.7–92.4] and 90.4% (95% CI 87.4–92.8) in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively, and no significant difference was seen between the 2 groups. No significant difference was observed in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the 2 groups (3-year RFS: 70.9%, 68.4 to 74.2 vs 71.8%, 67.5 to 75.7). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery could be considered as a treatment option for advanced, low rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection, based on the short-term and long-term results of this large cohort study (UMIN-ID: UMIN000013919).
Collapse
|
8
|
Draeger T, Völkel V, Schnitzbauer V, Gerken M, Benz S, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Fürst A. Laparoscopic and open resection of rectal cancer-is age an effect modifier for short- and long-term survival? Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:821-828. [PMID: 30778670 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03265-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rectal cancer is a frequently diagnosed tumor worldwide. Various studies have shown the noninferiority or even slight superiority of laparoscopic resection. However, there is no clear recommendation on whether age should influence the choice of surgical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study compared outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients. Perioperative mortality and 5-year overall, relative, and recurrence-free survival rates were analyzed separately for three age groups. Data originate from 30 regional German cancer registries that cover approximately one quarter of the German population. All primary nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma cases with surgery between 2005 and 2014 were eligible for inclusion. To compare survival rates, Kaplan-Meier analysis, a relative survival model, and multivariable Cox regression were used; a sensitivity analysis assessed bias by exclusion. RESULTS Ten thousand seven hundred fifty-four patients were included in the analysis. The mean laparoscopy rate was 23.0% and increased over time. Analysis of 30-day postoperative mortality rates revealed advantages for laparoscopically treated patients, although the significance level was not reached in any age group. Regarding 5-year overall survival, laparoscopy generally seems to be the superior approach, whereas for recurrence-free survival, an age-dependent gradient in effect size was observed: with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.703 for laparoscopy, patients under 60 years benefitted more from the minimally invasive approach than older patients (septuagenarians, HR 0.923). CONCLUSION Laparoscopy shows similar results to the open approach in terms of postoperative survival in all age groups. Concerning long-term outcomes, younger patients benefitted most from the minimally invasive approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Draeger
- Tumorzentrum Regensburg - Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Vinzenz Völkel
- Tumorzentrum Regensburg - Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Gerken
- Tumorzentrum Regensburg - Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Benz
- Klinik für Allgemeine-, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Kliniken Böblingen, Bunsenstr. 120, 71032, Böblingen, Germany
| | - Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
- Tumorzentrum Regensburg - Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Alois Fürst
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thoraxchirurgie und Adipositasmedizin, Caritas Krankenhaus St. Josef Regensburg, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sourrouille I, Macovei R, Faron M, Le Péchoux C, Mir O, Adam J, Dumont S, Terrier P, Le Cesne A, Honoré C. Long-Term Outcome After Surgery for a Localized Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Elderly Patients: Results from a Retrospective, Single-Center Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2201-2208. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6529-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
10
|
Long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic vs. open colon cancer resection: a high-quality population-based analysis in a Southern German district. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:4138-4147. [PMID: 29602999 PMCID: PMC6132887 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6158-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Over 20 years after the introduction of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer, many surgeons still prefer the open approach. Whereas randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have proven the oncologic safety of laparoscopy, long-term data depicting daily clinical routine are scarce. Methods This population-based cohort study compares 5-year overall, relative, and recurrence-free survival rates after laparoscopic and open colon carcinoma surgery. Data derive from an independent German cancer registry encompassing all tumor patients within a political district of 1.1 million inhabitants. The final analysis included 2669 patients with major elective resection of primary non-metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013. Survival rates were compared using Kaplan–Meier analyses, relative survival models, and multivariate Cox regression. Sensitivity analysis quantified selection bias. Results The proportion of laparoscopic procedures increased from 9.7 to 25.8% in 2011 and dropped again to 15.8% at the end of observation period. Laparoscopy patients were younger, had a lower tumor stage, and were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy. Overall, relative, and recurrence-free survival was significantly superior or equivalent in Kaplan–Meier analysis (5-year overall survival rate open vs. laparoscopic: 69.0 vs. 80.2%, p < 0.001). The superiority of laparoscopy mostly remained stable after adjusting for confounders, although significance was only reached in T1-3 patients without lymph node metastases (overall survival: hazard ratio (HR) 0.654; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.446–0.958; p = 0.029). Conclusion Laparoscopy is a safe and promising alternative to the open approach in daily clinic practice. These favorable outcomes require future confirmation by high-quality studies outside the setting of RTCs.
Collapse
|
11
|
Garfinkle R, Boutros M, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky CA, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Stein B, Feldman LS, Lee L. Clinical and Economic Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Open and Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28:811-818. [PMID: 29451415 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The short-term benefits of laparoscopy for rectal surgery are equivocal. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical and economic impact of an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) for laparoscopic and open rectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who underwent elective rectal resection with primary anastomosis between January 2009 and March 2012 at two tertiary-care, university-affiliated institutions were identified. Patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into four groups, according to surgical approach (laparoscopic [lap] or open) and perioperative management (ERP or conventional care [CC]). Length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and hospital costs were compared. RESULTS A total of 381 patients were included in the analysis (201 open-CC, 34 lap-CC, 38 open-ERP, and 108 lap-ERP). Patients were mostly similar at baseline. ERPs significantly reduced median LOS after both open cases (open-CC 10 days versus open-ERP 7.5 days, P = .003) and laparoscopic cases (lap-CC 5 days versus lap-ERP 4.5 days, P = .046). ERPs also reduced variability in LOS compared with CC. There was no difference in postoperative complications with the use of ERPs (open-CC 51% versus open-ERP 50%, P = .419; lap-CC 32% versus lap-ERP 36%, P = .689). On multivariate analysis, both ERP (-3.6 days [95% confidence interval, CI -6.0 to -1.3]) and laparoscopy (-3.6 days [95% CI -5.9 to -1.0]) were independently associated with decreased LOS. Overall costs were only lower when lap-ERP was compared with open-CC (mean difference -2420 CAN$ [95% CI -5628 to -786]). CONCLUSIONS ERPs reduced LOS after rectal resections, and the combination of laparoscopy and ERPs significantly reduced overall costs compared to when neither strategy was used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Garfinkle
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marylise Boutros
- 2 Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gabriela Ghitulescu
- 2 Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carol-Ann Vasilevsky
- 2 Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patrick Charlebois
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sender Liberman
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Barry Stein
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lakkis Z, Panis Y. Is There Any Reason Not to Perform Standard Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30:333-338. [PMID: 29184468 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The curative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is currently based on chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision (TME). Laparoscopy has developed considerably because of obvious clinical benefits such as reduced pain and shorter hospital stay. Recently, several prospective randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up have showed that laparoscopy is noninferior to laparotomy with the same oncologic outcomes in terms of survival and local control rate. However, laparoscopic TME remains a challenging procedure requiring a high level of expertise and a long learning curve to ensure an adequate and safe resection. The only relative contraindication of laparoscopic rectal surgery is T4 rectal cancer extended beyond the plane of TME. In this situation, it is reasonable to consider an open resection to avoid an uncomplete resection. In obese and elderly patients, laparoscopic TME also provides the same benefits as in nonobese and younger patients but may be more difficult to achieve. This review summarizes current knowledge on the place of laparoscopic TME in the treatment of rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaher Lakkis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Denis-Diderot (Paris 7), Clichy, France
| | - Yves Panis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Denis-Diderot (Paris 7), Clichy, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pulmonary Complications after Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients: Evaluation of Laparoscopic versus Open Approach from a Multicenter Study on 477 Consecutive Cases. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017:5893890. [PMID: 29201047 PMCID: PMC5671719 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5893890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the impact of open or laparoscopic rectal surgery on pulmonary complications in elderly (>75 years old) patients. Methods Data from consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open rectal surgery for cancer were collected prospectively from 3 institutions. Pulmonary complications were defined according to the ACS/NSQUIP definition. Results A total of 477 patients (laparoscopic group: 242, open group: 235) were included in the analysis. Postoperative pulmonary complications were significantly more common after open surgery (8 out of 242 patients (3.3%) versus 23 out of 235 patients (9.8%); p = 0.005). In addition, PPC occurrence was associated with the increasing of postoperative pain (5.04 ± 1.62 versus 5.03 ± 1.58; p = 0.001) and the increasing of operative time (270.06 ± 51.49 versus 237.37 ± 65.97; p = 0.001). Conclusion Our results are encouraging to consider laparoscopic surgery a safety and effective way to treat rectal cancer in elderly patients, highlighting that laparoscopic surgery reduces the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang A, Liu T, Zheng K, Liu N, Huang F, Li W, Liu T, Fu W. Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) scoring system could provide preoperative advice on whether to undergo laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients with a high physiological risk. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e7772. [PMID: 28816959 PMCID: PMC5571696 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000007772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery had been widely used for colorectal cancer patient and showed a favorable outcome on the postoperative morbidity rate. We attempted to evaluate physiological status of patients by mean of Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) system and to analyze the difference variation of postoperative morbidity rate of open and laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in patients with different physiological status.In total 550 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgery treatment were included. E-PASS and some conventional scoring systems were reviewed to examine their mortality prediction ability. The preoperative risk score (PRS) in the E-PASS system was used to evaluate the physiological status of patients. The difference of postoperative morbidity rate between open and laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgeries was analyzed respectively in patients with different physiological status.E-PASS had better prediction ability than other conventional scoring systems in colorectal cancer surgeries. Postoperative morbidities were developed in 143 patients. The parameters in the E-PASS system had positive correlations with postoperative morbidity. The overall postoperative morbidity rate of laparoscopic surgeries was lower than open surgeries (19.61% and 28.46%), but the postoperative morbidity rate of laparoscopic surgeries increased more significantly than in open surgery as PRS increased. When PRS was more than 0.7, the postoperative morbidity rate of laparoscopic surgeries would exceed the postoperative morbidity rate of open surgeries.The E-PASS system was capable to evaluate the physiological and surgical risk of colorectal cancer surgery. PRS could assist preoperative decision-making on the surgical method. Colorectal cancer patients who were assessed with a low physiological risk by PRS would be safe to undergo laparoscopic surgery. On the contrary, surgeons should make decisions prudently on the operation method for patient with a high physiological risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin
| | - Tingting Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin
| | - Kaiyuan Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin
| | - Ningbo Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Handan First Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Fei Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin
| | - Weidong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin
| | - Tong Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin
| | - Weihua Fu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Landi F, Espín E, Rodrigues V, Vallribera F, Martinez A, Charpy C, Brunetti F, Azoulay D, de'Angelis N. Pathologic response grade after long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation does not influence morbidity in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer resected by laparoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32:255-264. [PMID: 27757541 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2685-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy have lower rates of recurrence compared to those who do not. However, the influences of the pathologic response on surgical complications and survival remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the influence of neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer on postoperative morbidity and long-term survival. METHODS This was a comparative study of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in two European tertiary hospitals between 2004 and 2014. Patients with and without pathologic complete responses were compared in terms of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival. RESULTS Fifty patients with complete response (ypT0N0) were compared with 141 patients who exhibited non-complete response. No group differences were observed in the postoperative mortality or morbidity rates. The median follow-up time was 57 months (range 1-121). Over this period, 11 (5.8 %) patients, all of whom were in the non-complete response group, exhibited local recurrence. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were significantly better in the complete response group, 92.5 vs. 75.3 % (p = 0.004) and 89 vs. 73.4 % (p = 0.002), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative complication rate after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision is not associated with the pathologic response grade to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Landi
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est, UPEC, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Creteil, France. .,Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. .,Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Eloy Espín
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor Rodrigues
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Vallribera
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aleix Martinez
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est, UPEC, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Creteil, France
| | - Cecile Charpy
- Department of Pathology. Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Francesco Brunetti
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est, UPEC, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Creteil, France
| | - Daniel Azoulay
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est, UPEC, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Creteil, France
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est, UPEC, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sellars HE, Keogh K, Thakral N, Bethune R. Response to 'Morbidity after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery: a comparative analysis of morbidity in octogenarians and younger patients'. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18:1016. [PMID: 27401193 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H E Sellars
- Colorectal Department, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK.
| | - K Keogh
- Colorectal Department, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - N Thakral
- Colorectal Department, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - R Bethune
- Colorectal Department, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Landi F, Espín Basany E. Response to Sellars et al. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18:1016-1017. [PMID: 27416983 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F Landi
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - E Espín Basany
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Smart N. Risk Stratification for the elderly - a pressing issue. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18:437. [PMID: 27138710 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Smart
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|