1
|
Steen CJ, Wei MYK, Vadakkenchery Varghese E, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Sansom W, Balakrishnan V, An V, Chandra R. Quality of life amongst patients with diverting umbilical stomas in rectal surgery: a single centre prospective randomized controlled pilot study. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:187-192. [PMID: 37749845 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The umbilical stoma (umbistoma) has been proposed as a viable alternative site for a temporary defunctioning stoma. Suggested advantages of the umbistoma include decreased number of surgical incisions required, improved cosmesis and ease of reversal surgery. This study aimed to assess the patient experience of umbilical loop ileostomies in rectal surgery, with the primary outcome being patient reported quality of life (QoL). METHODS A total of 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery were randomly allocated to have a defunctioning ileostomy at a conventional site (right iliac fossa) or at the umbilicus. Patient-reported QoL was assessed at 6 weeks using the Stoma-QoL questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were number of stomas reversed, length of time awaiting stoma reversal surgery, duration of operative time for stoma reversal, length of hospital stay following stoma reversal and rate of parastomal or post reversal incisional hernias. RESULTS Patients who had an umbilical stoma scored significantly lower on the Stoma-QoL questionnaire compared to the conventional group, particularly on questions regarding feelings of tiredness, body insecurity and anxiety. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in relation to secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION There may be potential disadvantages to the umbilical stoma with negative impacts on body image and subsequent increased social anxiety. Patient selection and adequate counselling will be important when considering an umbilical stoma. Further larger scale prospective studies are required to further validate the feasibility and longer-term safety of umbilical stomas in both clinical outcomes as well as patient QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Steen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Y K Wei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi
- Cabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wendy Sansom
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vikram Balakrishnan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vinna An
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Raaj Chandra
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moiș E, Graur F, Horvath L, Furcea L, Zaharie F, Vălean D, Moldovan S, Al Hajjar N. Perineal Hernia Mesh Repair Using Only the Perineal Approach: How We Do It. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1456. [PMID: 37888067 PMCID: PMC10608043 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13101456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Perineal hernia is a rare complication of rectal surgery. Different types of surgical approach have been described, but none of them have proven their superiority. Although there are many methods of closing the defect, we selected two cases to present from a series of five cases, in which the perineal hernia was successfully resolved surgically using only the perineal approach. The reconstruction of the perineal floor and closure of the defect were performed using a synthetic polypropylene mesh. The significance of this Technical Note article lies in the fact that we describe, step by step, a surgical technique for perineal hernia using just a perineal approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emil Moiș
- 3rd Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (E.M.); (L.H.); (L.F.); (F.Z.); (D.V.); (S.M.); (N.A.H.)
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “O. Fodor”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Florin Graur
- 3rd Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (E.M.); (L.H.); (L.F.); (F.Z.); (D.V.); (S.M.); (N.A.H.)
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “O. Fodor”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Levente Horvath
- 3rd Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (E.M.); (L.H.); (L.F.); (F.Z.); (D.V.); (S.M.); (N.A.H.)
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “O. Fodor”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Luminița Furcea
- 3rd Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (E.M.); (L.H.); (L.F.); (F.Z.); (D.V.); (S.M.); (N.A.H.)
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “O. Fodor”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Florin Zaharie
- 3rd Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (E.M.); (L.H.); (L.F.); (F.Z.); (D.V.); (S.M.); (N.A.H.)
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “O. Fodor”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Dan Vălean
- 3rd Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (E.M.); (L.H.); (L.F.); (F.Z.); (D.V.); (S.M.); (N.A.H.)
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “O. Fodor”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Septimiu Moldovan
- 3rd Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (E.M.); (L.H.); (L.F.); (F.Z.); (D.V.); (S.M.); (N.A.H.)
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “O. Fodor”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Nadim Al Hajjar
- 3rd Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hațieganu”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (E.M.); (L.H.); (L.F.); (F.Z.); (D.V.); (S.M.); (N.A.H.)
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “O. Fodor”, Croitorilor Street, No. 19–21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muttillo EM, La Franca A, Coppola A, Li Causi FS, Checchelani M, Ceccacci A, Castagnola G, Garbarino GM, Osti MF, Balducci G, Mercantini P. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Inevitable Price to Pay for Survival, or a Preventable Complication? J Clin Med 2023; 12:5962. [PMID: 37762904 PMCID: PMC10532021 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal cancer is frequent and often treated with sphincter-saving procedures that may cause LARS, a syndrome characterized by symptoms of bowel disfunction that may severely affect quality of life. LARS is common, but its pathogenesis is mostly unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of LARS and to identify potential risk factors. METHODS We performed an observational retrospective single center analysis. The following data were collected and analyzed for each patient: demographics, tumor-related data, and intra- and peri-operative data. Statistical analysis was conducted, including descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS Total LARS incidence was 31%. Statistically significant differences were found in tumor distance from anal verge, tumor extension (pT and diameter) and tumor grading (G). Multivariate analysis identified tumor distance from anal verge and tumor extension as an independent predictive factor for both major and total LARS. Adjuvant therapy, although not significant at univariate analysis, was identified as an independent predictive factor. Time to stoma closure within 10 weeks seems to reduce incidence of major LARS. CONCLUSIONS bold LARS affects a considerable portion of patients. This study identified potential predictive factors that could be useful to identify high risk patients for LARS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Maria Muttillo
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00191 Rome, Italy; (A.L.F.); (F.S.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (G.C.); (G.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Alice La Franca
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00191 Rome, Italy; (A.L.F.); (F.S.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (G.C.); (G.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Alessandro Coppola
- Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Francesco Saverio Li Causi
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00191 Rome, Italy; (A.L.F.); (F.S.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (G.C.); (G.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Marzia Checchelani
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00191 Rome, Italy; (A.L.F.); (F.S.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (G.C.); (G.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Alice Ceccacci
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00191 Rome, Italy; (A.L.F.); (F.S.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (G.C.); (G.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Giorgio Castagnola
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00191 Rome, Italy; (A.L.F.); (F.S.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (G.C.); (G.B.); (P.M.)
| | | | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Radiotherapy Oncology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00191 Rome, Italy;
| | - Genoveffa Balducci
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00191 Rome, Italy; (A.L.F.); (F.S.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (G.C.); (G.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Paolo Mercantini
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00191 Rome, Italy; (A.L.F.); (F.S.L.C.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (G.C.); (G.B.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tırnova İ, Işık Ö, Yılmazlar AT. Risk factors affecting oncological outcomes of surgical resections for middle and lower rectal cancer. Turk J Surg 2023; 39:197-203. [PMID: 38058368 PMCID: PMC10696443 DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Objectives In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the factors affecting oncological outcomes in resections for rectal cancer. Material and Methods Between January 2010 and December 2014, patients with rectal tumors were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic and pathological data and oncological outcomes were analyzed as disease-free survival, overall survival, and local recurrence. Results A total of 158 patients' data were obtained. Median age was 60 (22-83). Fifty-three patients were older than 65 years of age (138). Ninety-five (60%) patients were males, and 63 (40%) were females. Eighty patients (50.4%) had middle rectal, and 78 (49.6) patients had lower rectal cancer. There was no effect of tumor localization on oncological outcomes. Univariate analyses revealed the effects of age (p= 0.003), operation type (p <0.001), nodal status (p <0.001), malignant lymph node ratio (p <0.001), stage of the disease (p <0.001), distal resection margin (p= 0.047), perineural invasion (p <0.001), lymphatic invasion (p <0.001), venous-vascular invasion (p= 0.025), local recurrence (p <0.001) and distant metastasis (p <0.001) on overall survival rates. Univariate analyses revealed the effects of nodal status (p= 0.007), malignant lymph node ratio (p= 0.005), stage of the disease (p= 0.008), perineural invasion (p= 0.004) and venous-vascular invasion (p <0.001) on disease-free survival rates. Univariate analyses revealed the effects of anastomotic leak (p= 0.015) and venous-vascular invasion (p= 0.001) on local recurrence rates. Conclusion Older age, advanced nodal status, and distant metastasis were detected as independent risk factors for overall survival. Perineural and venous-vascular invasion were detected as independent risk factors for disease-free survival. Lastly, anastomotic leak and venous-vascular invasion were detected as independent risk factors for local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- İsmail Tırnova
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Türkiye
| | - Özgen Işık
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Türkiye
| | - Ahmet Tuncay Yılmazlar
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chaouch MA, Daghmouri MA, Lahdheri A, Hussain MI, Nasri S, Gouader A, Noomen F, Oweira H. How to prevent postoperative ileus in colo rectal surgery? a systematic review. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2023; 85:4501-4508. [PMID: 37663708 PMCID: PMC10473296 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000001099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Postoperative ileus (PI) after colorectal surgery is a common surgical problem. This systematic review aimed to investigate the available data in the literature to reduce the PI in the area of colorectal surgery out of the enhanced recovery after surgery principles, referring to published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses, and to provide recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The authors conducted bibliographic research on 1 December 2022. The authors retained meta-analyses and RCTs. The authors concluded that when we combined colonic mechanical preparation with oral antibiotic decontamination, the authors found a significant reduction in PI. The open approach was associated with a higher PI rate. The robotic and laparoscopic approaches had similar PI rates. Low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery presented a PI similar to that of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. There was no difference between the isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses or between the intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomoses. This study summarized the available data in the literature, including meta-analyses and RCTs. For a higher level of evidence, additional multicenter RCTs and meta-analyses of RCTs remain necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Ali Chaouch
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir
| | - Mohamed Aziz Daghmouri
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Saint-Louis Hospital AP-HP, University of Paris
| | - Abdallah Lahdheri
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Farhat Hached Hospital, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Mohammad Iqbal Hussain
- Department of Robotic Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Salsabil Nasri
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Louis Mourier Hospital AP-HP, Paris
| | - Amine Gouader
- Department of Surgery, Perpignan Hospital Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Faouzi Noomen
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir
| | - Hani Oweira
- Department of Surgery, Universitäts medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smalbroek B, Geitenbeek R, Burghgraef T, Dijksman L, Hol J, Rutgers M, Crolla R, van Geloven N, Leijtens J, Polat F, Pronk A, Verdaasdonk E, Tuynman J, Sietses C, Postma M, Hompes R, Consten E, Smits A. A Cost Overview of Minimally Invasive Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Population-based Cohort in Experienced Centres. Ann Surg Open 2023; 4:e263. [PMID: 37600875 PMCID: PMC10431334 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Total mesorectal excision has been the gold standard for the operative management of rectal cancer. The most frequently used minimally invasive techniques for surgical resection of rectal cancer are laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal excision. As studies comparing the costs of the techniques are lacking, this study aims to provide a cost overview. Method This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent total mesorectal resection between 2015 and 2017 at 11 dedicated centers, which completed the learning curve of the specific technique. The primary outcome was total in-hospital costs of each technique up to 30 days after surgery including all major surgical cost drivers, while taking into account different team approaches in the transanal approach. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization and complication rates. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariable linear regression analysis. Results In total, 949 patients were included, consisting of 446 laparoscopic (47%), 306 (32%) robot-assisted, and 197 (21%) transanal total mesorectal excisions. Total costs were significantly higher for transanal and robot-assisted techniques compared to the laparoscopic technique, with median (interquartile range) for laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal at €10,556 (8,642;13,829), €12,918 (11,196;16,223), and € 13,052 (11,330;16,358), respectively (P < 0.001). Also, the one-team transanal approach showed significant higher operation time and higher costs compared to the two-team approach. Length of stay and postoperative complications did not differ between groups. Conclusion Transanal and robot-assisted approaches show higher costs during 30-day follow-up compared to laparoscopy with comparable short-term clinical outcomes. Two-team transanal approach is associated with lower total costs compared to the transanal one-team approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Smalbroek
- From the Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Ritchie Geitenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lea Dijksman
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hol
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier Crolla
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen Leijtens
- Department of Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Apollo Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emiel Verdaasdonk
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Colin Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, Unit of Global Health, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics & Business, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anke Smits
- From the Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ceresoli M, Pedrazzani C, Pellegrino L, Muratore A, Ficari F, Polastri R, Scatizzi M, Totis M, Tamini N, Ripamonti L, Braga M. Early Postoperative Low Compliance to Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Rectal Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14. [PMID: 36497217 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Early postoperative low compliance to enhanced recovery protocols has been associated with morbidity following colon surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the possible causes of early postoperative low compliance to the enhanced recovery pathway and its relationship with morbidity following rectal surgery for cancer. A total of 439 consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for rectal cancer have been included in the study. Compliance to enhanced recovery protocol on postoperative day (POD) 2 was evaluated in all patients. Indicators of compliance were naso-gastric tube and urinary catheter removal, recovery of both oral feeding and mobilization, and the stopping of intravenous fluids. Low compliance on POD 2 was defined as non- adherence to two or more items. One-third of patients had low compliance on POD 2. Removal of urinary catheter, intravenous fluids stop, and mobilization were the items with lowest adherence. Advanced age, duration of surgery, open surgery and diverting stoma were predictive factors of low compliance at multivariate analysis. Overall morbidity and major complications were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with low compliance on POD 2. At multivariate analysis, failure to remove urinary catheter on POD 2 (OR = 1.83) was significantly correlated with postoperative complications. Low compliance to enhanced recovery protocol on POD 2 was significantly associated with morbidity. Failure to remove the urinary catheter was the most predictive indicator. Advanced age, long procedure, open surgery and diverting stoma were independent predictive factors of low compliance.
Collapse
|
8
|
Shaltiel T, Gingold-Belfer R, Kirshtein B, Issa N. The outcome of local excision of large rectal polyps by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. J Minim Access Surg 2022; 19:282-287. [PMID: 36124472 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_147_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Local excision of large rectal polyps can be an alternative for radical rectal resection with total mesorectal excision. We aim to report the functional and oncological outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for patients with large rectal polyps. Methods All demographic and clinical data of patients who underwent TEM for rectal polyp of 5 cm or more at the Hasharon Hospital from 2005 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Results Twenty-eight patients were included. The mean age was 66 years. The mean polyp size was 6.2 cm (range: 5-8.5 cm) with a mean distance of 8.3 cm from the anal verge. Peritoneal entry during TEM was observed in five patients and additional laparoscopy after the completion of the TEM was performed in four patients. There were no major perioperative complications. Seven patients had minor complications. Final pathology revealed T1 carcinoma in five patients and T2 carcinoma in three patients. Re-TEM was performed in one patient with involved margins with adenoma. After a median follow-up of 64 months, one patient had local recurrence. Conclusion TEM is an acceptable technique for the treatment of large polyps with minor complications and a reasonable recurrence rate. TEM may be considered regardless of the size of the rectal polyp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tali Shaltiel
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Hasharon Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Rachel Gingold-Belfer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Boris Kirshtein
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Hasharon Hospital, Petah Tikva; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nidal Issa
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Hasharon Hospital, Petah Tikva; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miao X, Liu L, Wang X, Fan Z, Miao L, Wang J. Clinical efficacy of endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection for benign anastomotic stricture after rectal surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30036. [PMID: 35984174 PMCID: PMC9387986 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Benign anastomotic stricture is a frequent complication after rectal surgery. This study investigated the feasibility of endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection for benign anastomotic stricture after rectal surgery. 31 patients who diagnosed with benign anastomotic stricture after rectal surgery were included in this study. 15 patients received simple endoscopic dilation (dilation group) and 16 patients received endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection (bleomycin group). The clinical effect and adverse events were compared in the 2 groups. The strictures were managed successfully and the obstruction symptoms were relieved immediately. There were 2 minor complications in dilation group and 3 minor complications in bleomycin group. The difference was not significant between the 2 groups (P > .05). During the follow-up, the mean reintervention interval was 4.97 ± 1.00 months in dilation group and 7.60 ± 1.36 months in bleomycin group. The median treatment times was 4 (range 3-5) in dilation group and 2 (range 2-3) in bleomycin group. The differences in the 2 groups were significant (P < .05). Compared with endoscopic dilation, endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection may reduce the treatment times and prolong the reintervention interval, which is a safe and effective endoscopic management for benign anastomotic stricture after rectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Miao
- Gastroenterology Department, Taizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taizhou, China
| | - Li Liu
- Digestive Endoscopy Department & General Surgery Department, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Digestive Endoscopy Department & General Surgery Department, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhining Fan
- Digestive Endoscopy Department & General Surgery Department, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Lin Miao
- Gastroenterology Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiankun Wang
- Digestive Endoscopy Department & General Surgery Department, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
- *Correspondence: Jiankun Wang, Digestive Endoscopy Department & General Surgery Department, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Province Hospital, 300 Guangzhou Road, 210029, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Karam E, Sindayigaya R, Giger-Pabst U, Gabriel M, Michot N, Courtot L, Tabchouri N, Moussata D, Lecomte T, Chapet S, Calais G, Bourlier P, Salamé E, Ouaissi M. Impact of Modern Management Strategies on the Clinical Outcome of Patients With Low Rectal Cancer - A Retrospective, Monocentric Cohort Study. Anticancer Res 2022; 42:1949-1963. [PMID: 35347015 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the impact of intersphincteric resection (ISR) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Since we implemented rectal ERAS protocol and ISR in 2016, we retrospectively assessed and compared clinical, pathological and survival outcomes of two groups of patients: group 1, treated 2000-2015 (n=242); and group 2, treated 2016-2020 (n=108). Propensity score matching using nearest-neighbor method was used to match each patient of group 1 to a patient of group 2. RESULTS Before and after matching, the American Society of Anesthesiology score for patients in group 1 was significantly lower than in group 2 (score of 3: 9.9% vs. 25.9%, p<0.0001) as were grade I-II complications (27.7% vs. 45.4% p<0.001). Before and after matching, the quality of the mesorectum excision was significantly lower in group 1 (complete in 31% vs. 59.2% p<0.0001). After matching, 3-year overall survival for groups 1 and 2 were similar (88.2% vs. 92.6%; p=0.988). CONCLUSION ERAS and ISR had no negative impact on the oncological outcome of our patients and increased the preservation of bowel continuity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Karam
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Remy Sindayigaya
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Urs Giger-Pabst
- EA4245 Transplantation, Immunologie, Inflammation, Université de Tours, Tours, France.,Fliedner Fachhochschule, University of Applied Science, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michel Gabriel
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Nicolas Michot
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Lise Courtot
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Nicolas Tabchouri
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Driffa Moussata
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Trousseau Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Thierry Lecomte
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Trousseau Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Sophie Chapet
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bretonneau Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Gilles Calais
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bretonneau Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Pascal Bourlier
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Mehdi Ouaissi
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France; .,EA4245 Transplantation, Immunologie, Inflammation, Université de Tours, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Degiuli M, Elmore U, De Luca R, De Nardi P, Tomatis M, Biondi A, Persiani R, Solaini L, Rizzo G, Soriero D, Cianflocca D, Milone M, Turri G, Rega D, Delrio P, Pedrazzani C, De Palma GD, Borghi F, Scabini S, Coco C, Cavaliere D, Simone M, Rosati R, Reddavid R. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:264-276. [PMID: 34816571 PMCID: PMC9300066 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM Anastomotic leakage after restorative surgery for rectal cancer shows high morbidity and related mortality. Identification of risk factors could change operative planning, with indications for stoma construction. This retrospective multicentre study aims to assess the anastomotic leak rate, identify the independent risk factors and develop a clinical prediction model to calculate the probability of leakage. METHODS The study used data from 24 Italian referral centres of the Colorectal Cancer Network of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. Patients were classified into two groups, AL (anastomotic leak) or NoAL (no anastomotic leak). The effect of patient-, disease-, treatment- and postoperative outcome-related factors on anastomotic leak after univariable and multivariable analysis was measured. RESULTS A total of 5398 patients were included, 552 in group AL and 4846 in group NoAL. The overall incidence of leaks was 10.2%, with a mean time interval of 6.8 days. The 30-day leak-related mortality was 2.6%. Sex, body mass index, tumour location, type of approach, number of cartridges employed, weight loss, clinical T stage and combined multiorgan resection were identified as independent risk factors. The stoma did not reduce the leak rate but significantly decreased leak severity and reoperation rate. A nomogram with a risk score (RALAR score) was developed to predict anastomotic leak risk at the end of resection. CONCLUSIONS While a defunctioning stoma did not affect the leak risk, it significantly reduced its severity. Surgeons should recognize independent risk factors for leaks at the end of rectal resection and could calculate a risk score to select high-risk patients eligible for protective stoma construction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Degiuli
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Digestive SurgeryDepartment of OncologySan Luigi University HospitalUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Division of Gastrointestinal SurgerySan Raffaele HospitalMilanItaly
| | - Raffaele De Luca
- Department of Surgical OncologyIRCCS Istituto Tumori ‘G. Paolo II’BariItaly
| | - Paola De Nardi
- Division of Gastrointestinal SurgerySan Raffaele HospitalMilanItaly
| | | | - Alberto Biondi
- Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli—IRCCSAREA di Chirurgia AddominaleRomeItaly
| | - Roberto Persiani
- Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli—IRCCSAREA di Chirurgia AddominaleRomeItaly
| | - Leonardo Solaini
- General and Oncologic SurgeryMorgagni‐Pierantoni HospitalAusl RomagnaForlìItaly
| | - Gianluca Rizzo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCSChirurgia Generale Presidio ColumbusRomeItaly
| | - Domenico Soriero
- Surgical Oncology SurgeryIRCCS Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | | | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and SurgeryDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Endoscopic SurgeryUniversity of Naples ‘Federico II’NaplesItaly
| | - Giulia Turri
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary SurgeryDepartment of Surgical SciencesDentistry, Gynaecology and PaediatricsUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Daniela Rega
- Colorectal Surgical OncologyAbdominal Oncology DepartmentFondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCSNaplesItaly
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical OncologyAbdominal Oncology DepartmentFondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCSNaplesItaly
| | - Corrado Pedrazzani
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary SurgeryDepartment of Surgical SciencesDentistry, Gynaecology and PaediatricsUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Giovanni D. De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and SurgeryDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Endoscopic SurgeryUniversity of Naples ‘Federico II’NaplesItaly
| | - Felice Borghi
- Department of SurgeryS. Croce e Carle HospitalCuneoItaly
| | - Stefano Scabini
- Surgical Oncology SurgeryIRCCS Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Claudio Coco
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCSChirurgia Generale Presidio ColumbusUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - Davide Cavaliere
- General and Oncologic SurgeryMorgagni‐Pierantoni HospitalAusl RomagnaForlìItaly
| | - Michele Simone
- Department of Surgical OncologyIRCCS Istituto Tumori ‘G. Paolo II’BariItaly
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Division of Gastrointestinal SurgerySan Raffaele HospitalVita Salute UniversityMilanItaly
| | - Rossella Reddavid
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Digestive SurgeryDepartment of OncologySan Luigi University HospitalUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoek VT, Sparreboom CL, Wolthuis AM, Menon AG, Kleinrensink G, D'Hoore A, Komen N, Lange JF. C-reactive protein (CRP) trajectory as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: A multicentre cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:220-227. [PMID: 34706131 PMCID: PMC9298339 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to identify whether CRP-trajectory measurement, including increase in CRP-level of 50 mg/l per day, is an accurate predictor of anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer. METHODS A prospective multicentre database was used. CRP was recorded on the first three postoperative days. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve were used to analyse performances of CRP-trajectory measurements between postoperative day (POD) 1-2, 2-3, 1-3 and between any two days. RESULTS A total of 271 patients were included in the study. AL was observed in 12.5% (34/271). Increase in CRP-level of 50 mg/l between POD 1-2 had a negative predictive value of 0.92, specificity of 0.71 and sensitivity of 0.57. Changes in CRP-levels between POD 2-3 were associated with a negative predictive value, specificity and sensitivity of 0.89, 0.93 and 0.26, respectively. Changes in CRP-levels between POD 1-3 showed a negative predictive value of 0.94, specificity of 0.76 and sensitivity of 0.65. In addition, 50 mg/l changes between any two days showed a negative predictive value of 0.92, specificity of 0.66 and sensitivity of 0.62. The area under the ROC curve for all CRP-trajectory measurements ranged from 0.593-0.700. CONCLUSION The present study showed that CRP-trajectory between postoperative days lacks predictive value to singularly rule out AL. Early and safe discharge in patients undergoing rectal surgery for adenocarcinoma cannot be guaranteed based on this parameter. High negative predictive values are mainly caused by the relatively low prevalence of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent T. Hoek
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Cloë L. Sparreboom
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Anand G. Menon
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands,Department of SurgeryIJsselland HospitalCapelle aan den IJsselThe Netherlands
| | - Gert‐Jan Kleinrensink
- Department of Neuroscience‐AnatomyErasmus University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Niels Komen
- Department of SurgeryAntwerp University HospitalAntwerpBelgium,Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC)Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of AntwerpWilrijkBelgium
| | - Johan F. Lange
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Okada M, Kawai K, Sasaki K, Nozawa H, Kaneko M, Murono K, Emoto S, Iida Y, Ishii H, Yokoyama Y, Anzai H, Sonoda H, Ishihara S. Intervention Strategies to Reduce Surgical Site Infection Rates in Patients Undergoing Rectal Cancer Surgery. In Vivo 2022; 36:439-445. [PMID: 34972746 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of surgical site infection (SSI) prevention approaches in rectal cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1,408 patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgery between 1995 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups: control group (group A, n=245), SSI prevention intervention group (group B, n=516), and laparoscopic or robotic surgery group (group C, n=647). The groups were compared in terms of SSI and anastomotic leakage (AL) incidences, and risk factors for SSI were investigated. RESULTS The overall SSI and AL rates were 19.4% and 3.6%, respectively. These rates were significantly lower in Group C (9.3%, 1.7%), compared to Groups A (40.0%, 6.1%) and B (22.5%, 3.5%). Abdominoperineal resection, open surgery, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, lack of absorbable sutures, lack of mechanical bowel preparation, and lack of oral antibiotics were independently associated with SSI. CONCLUSION SSI reduction after rectal cancer surgery was achieved through various intervention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masamichi Okada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazushige Kawai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manabu Kaneko
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuuki Iida
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ishii
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Yokoyama
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Anzai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Sonoda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Postoperative complications of rectal resections classified as grade III or higher according to Clavien-Dindo system, which also include anastomotic leaks, are usually life-threatening conditions. Delayed diagnosis may account for almost 18% of deaths. Due to nonspecific clinical signs in the early postoperative period, diagnosing these complications may truly be a challenge for clinicians. Nowadays, with the implementation of the ERAS protocol (enhanced recovery after surgery) and efforts concentrated on quickly delivered treatment to patients suffering from the above-mentioned complications, an appropriate marker with high specificity is required. Postoperative levels of C-reactive protein in blood serum seem promising in this aspect. The presented study aimed to determine the cut-off level of serum C-reactive protein as a possible predictive factor for early diagnosis of serious postoperative complications associated with rectal resections. This could also lead clinicians to the diagnosis of anastomotic leak after other possible options are ruled out. This study is a retrospective observational analysis of patients who underwent open resection of rectal cancer during a one-year period. Collected data included risk factors (age, gender, BMI, bowel preparation), record of complications and C Reactive Protein (CRP) serum levels. The study included 162 patients. Uncomplicated postoperative course was observed in 58 patients (35.8%). Complications were present in 104 cases (64.2%), including surgical site infections (16.7%) and anastomotic leak (9.9%). The mortality rate was 2.5%. Serum CRP threshold predicting relevant complications reached a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 82.7% on POD 4, with a 175.4 mg/L cut-off value, burdened with a 95.7% negative predictive value. Postoperative serum C-reactive protein may be used as a good predictor of infectious complications, including anastomotic leaks. Measuring CRP levels in the early postoperative period may facilitate identification oflow-risk patients ensure early and safe discharges from hospital after rectal resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomáš Řezáč
- Department of Surgery I, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Stašek
- Department of Surgery I, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Zbořil
- Department of Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Špička
- Department of Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roodbeen SX, Blok RD, Borstlap WA, Bemelman WA, Hompes R, Tanis PJ. Does oncological outcome differ between restorative and nonrestorative low anterior resection in patients with primary rectal cancer? Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:843-852. [PMID: 33245846 PMCID: PMC8247354 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Nonrestorative low anterior resection (n-rLAR) (also known as low Hartmann's) is performed for rectal cancer when a poor functional outcome is anticipated or there have been problems when constructing the anastomosis. Compared with restorative LAR (rLAR), little oncological outcome data are available for n-rLAR. The aim of this study was to compare oncological outcomes between rLAR and n-rLAR for primary rectal cancer. METHOD This was a nationwide cross-sectional comparative study including all elective sphincter-saving LAR procedures for nonmetastatic primary rectal cancer performed in 2011 in 71 Dutch hospitals. Oncological outcomes of patients undergoing rLAR and n-rLAR were collected in 2015; the data were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the results compared using log-rank testing. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the type of LAR and oncological outcome measures. RESULTS A total of 1197 patients were analysed, of whom 892 (75%) underwent rLAR and 305 (25%) underwent n-rLAR. The 3-year local recurrence (LR) rate was 3% after rLAR and 8% after n-rLAR (P < 0.001). The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 77% (rLAR) vs 62% (n-rLAR) (P < 0.001) and 90% (rLAR) vs 75% (n-rLAR) (P < 0.001), respectively. In multivariable Cox analysis, n-rLAR was independently associated with a higher risk of LR (OR = 2.95) and worse overall survival (OR = 1.72). CONCLUSION This nationwide study revealed that n-rLAR for rectal cancer was associated with poorer oncological outcome than r-LAR. This is probably a noncausal relationship, and might reflect technical difficulties during low pelvic dissection in a subset of those patients, with oncological implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sapho X. Roodbeen
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCCancer Center AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Robin D. Blok
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCCancer Center AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands,LEXORCenter for Experimental and Molecular MedicineOncode InstituteCancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC (AMC)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Wernard A. Borstlap
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCCancer Center AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Willem A. Bemelman
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCCancer Center AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCCancer Center AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Pieter J. Tanis
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCCancer Center AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Christensen P, IM Baeten C, Espín‐Basany E, Martellucci J, Nugent KP, Zerbib F, Pellino G, Rosen H. Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome - the MANUEL project. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:461-475. [PMID: 33411977 PMCID: PMC7986060 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Little is known about the pathophysiology of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), and evidence concerning the management of patients diagnosed with this condition is scarce. The aim of the LARS Expert Advisory Panel was to develop practical guidance for healthcare professionals dealing with LARS. METHOD The 'Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome' (MANUEL) project was promoted by a team of eight experts in the assessment and management of patients with LARS. After a face-to-face meeting, a strategy was agreed to create a comprehensive, practical guide covering all aspects that were felt to be clinically relevant. Eight themes were decided upon and working groups established. Each working group generated a draft; these were collated by another collaborator into a manuscript, after a conference call. This was circulated among the collaborators, and it was revised following the comments received. A lay patient revised the manuscript, and contributed to a section containing a patient's perspective. The manuscript was again circulated and finalized. A final teleconference was held at the end of the project. RESULTS The guidance covers all aspects of LARS management, from pathophysiology, to assessment and management. Given the lack of sound evidence and the often poor quality of the studies, most of the recommendations and conclusions are based on the opinions of the experts. CONCLUSIONS The MANUEL project provides an up-to-date practical summary of the available evidence concerning LARS, with useful directions for healthcare professional and patients suffering from this debilitating condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Christensen
- Department of SurgeryDanish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic OrgansAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - Coen IM Baeten
- Department of SurgeryGroene Hart ZiekenhuisGoudaThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology DepartmentCHU de BordeauxCentre Medico‐Chirurgical MagellanHôpital Haut‐LévêqueUniversité de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Colorectal SurgeryVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain,Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversitá degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’NaplesItaly
| | - Harald Rosen
- Department of Surgical OncologySigmund Freud UniversityViennaAustria
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Morini A, Annicchiarico A, Romboli A, Ricco' M, Crafa P, Montali F, Dell'Abate P, Costi R. Retrospective survival analysis of stage II-III rectal cancer: tumour regression grade, grading and lymphovascular invasion are the only predictors. ANZ J Surg 2020; 91:E112-E118. [PMID: 33319510 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumour regression grade is gaining interest as a prognostic factor of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS A series of 68 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery between 2010 and 2016 was retrospectively studied. The impact on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of several criteria was analysed. Univariate analysis was performed through Kaplan-Meier statistics. Multivariate analysis was performed through Cox regression model. Using criteria found to be related to long-term outcomes, a predictive model of patient's OS was calculated. RESULTS Poor tumour regression grade - TRG3 (P = 0.010), poor grading - G3 (P = 0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI; P = 0.030) were associated with short OS at univariate analysis. OS was associated with TRG3 and G3 at multivariate analysis (P = 0.016 and P = 0.027, respectively). DFS was associated with LVI (P = 0.001), G3 tumours (P = 0.046) and TRG3 (P = 0.045) at univariate analysis. At multivariate analysis, only LVI was associated with DFS (P = 0.041). A score, pondering the impact of three parameters (2 points for TRG3, 2 for G3 and 1 for LVI), was created and resulted to predict patient OS (P = 0.008), ranging from 94.5 months (score = 0-1) to 32 months (score = 3-5). CONCLUSION TRG3 and G3 were associated with poor OS, and LVI was the most significant predictor of DFS. An easy-to-use score may allow for a more accurate prediction of OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Morini
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma University, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Romboli
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma University, Parma, Italy
| | - Matteo Ricco'
- Department of Public Health, Service for Health and Safety in the Workplace, Local Health Unit of Reggio Emilia - Regional Health Service of Emilia Romagna, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Pellegrino Crafa
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma University, Parma, Italy.,Pathological Anatomy and Histology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma University, Parma, Italy
| | - Filippo Montali
- General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Vaio, Fidenza (Parma), Local Health Unit of Parma - Regional Health Service of Emilia Romagna, Parma, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Abate
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma University, Parma, Italy.,General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Renato Costi
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma University, Parma, Italy.,General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Vaio, Fidenza (Parma), Local Health Unit of Parma - Regional Health Service of Emilia Romagna, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rubio-Perez I, Saavedra J, Marijuan JL, Pascual-Miguelañez I. Optimizing sacral neuromodulation for low anterior resection syndrome: learning from our experience. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:2146-2154. [PMID: 32657528 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this work was to review our institutional series of patients treated with sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and evaluate possible factors associated with therapeutic success. METHOD Twenty-five patients were treated with SNM for LARS between 2008 and 2019. SNM was performed as per our institutional protocol. Patients were evaluated with Wexner and LARS scores before and after SNM treatment. A visual analogue scale (1-10) was used to evaluate overall patient satisfaction with SNM. RESULTS There were significant differences between the mean LARS score values before (37.82) and after (29) SNM therapy (P < 0.004). The mean Wexner score was higher (16.24) before SNM treatment than afterwards (11.13) (P < 0.004). There was a direct relationship between the height of anastomosis and LARS score (P = 0.035): there were big changes in LARS scoring (pre-/post-SNM therapy) in patients with higher anastomoses, and vice versa. Patients who received radiotherapy scored lower in mean satisfaction (6.38) than patients without previous radiotherapy (8.22) (P = 0.008). There was an important positive association between Wexner score and patient satisfaction (P = 0.001): relevant changes in Wexner scoring after SNM therapy were associated with high patient satisfaction, and vice versa. CONCLUSION Our study showed a relationship between changes in Wexner and LARS scores before and after SNM and overall patient satisfaction with SNM therapy. These findings also suggest patients with previous radiotherapy may have worse results with SNM (based on lower overall satisfaction), and that higher anastomoses have a greater impact on the post-SNM LARS score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Rubio-Perez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Saavedra
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - J L Marijuan
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Pascual-Miguelañez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Notarnicola M, Celentano V, Gavriilidis P, Abdi B, Beghdadi N, Sommacale D, Brunetti F, Coccolini F, de'Angelis N. PDE-5i Management of Erectile Dysfunction After Rectal Surgery: A Systematic Review Focusing on Treatment Efficacy. Am J Mens Health 2020; 14:1557988320969061. [PMID: 33111645 PMCID: PMC7607736 DOI: 10.1177/1557988320969061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the main functional complications of surgical resections of the rectum due to rectal cancers or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The present systematic review aimed at revising ED management strategies applied after rectal resections and their efficacy in terms of improvement of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score. A literature search was conducted on Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases by two independent reviewers following the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs, NRCTs), case-control studies, and case series evaluating medical or surgical therapies for ED diagnosed after rectal surgery for both benign and malignant pathologies were eligible for inclusion. Out of 1028 articles initially identified, only five met the inclusion criteria: two RCTs comparing oral phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) versus placebo; one NRCT comparing PDE-5i versus PDE-5i + vacuum erection devices (VEDs) versus control; and two before-after studies on PDE-5i. A total of 253 (82.7%) rectal cancer patients and 53 (17.3%) IBD patients were included. Based on two RCTs, PDE-5i significantly improved IIEF compared to placebo at 3 months (SMD = 1.07; 95% CI [0.65, 1.48]; p < .00001; I2 = 39%). Improved IIEF was also reported with PDE-5i + VED at 12 months. There is a paucity of articles in the literature that specifically assess efficacy of ED treatments after rectal surgery. Many alternative treatment strategies to PDE-5is remain to be investigated. Future studies should implement standardized preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up sexual function assessment in patients undergoing rectal resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Notarnicola
- Unit of Digestive Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Valerio Celentano
- Colorectal Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bilal Abdi
- Unit of Digestive Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Nassiba Beghdadi
- Unit of Digestive Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Unit of Digestive Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Francesco Brunetti
- Unit of Digestive Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Digestive Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wee IJY, Kuo LJ, Ngu JCY. Urological and sexual function after robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Int J Med Robot 2020; 17:1-8. [PMID: 32945090 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review sought to compare the urogenital functions after laparoscopic (LAP) and robotic (ROB) surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS This study conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS Twenty-six studies (n = 2709 for ROB, n = 2720 for LAP) were included. There was a lower risk of 30-day urinary retention in the ROB group (risk ratios 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.99), but the long-term risk was comparable (p = 0.460). Meta-regression showed a small, positive relationship between age and risk of 30-day urinary retention in both the ROB (p = 0.034) and LAP groups (p = 0.004). The International Prostate Symptom Score was better in the ROB group at 3 months (mean difference [MD] -1.58, 95% CI -3.10 to -0.05). The International Index of Erectile Function score was better in the ROB group at 6 months (MD 4.06, 95% CI 2.38 - 5.74). CONCLUSION While robotics may improve urogenital function after rectal surgery, the quality of evidence is low based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Jun Yan Wee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li-Jen Kuo
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - James Chi-Yong Ngu
- Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Total mesorectal excision (TME) was first described 40 years ago by Richard Heald. The purpose of this article is to point out importance of this surgical procedure. Starting from first attempts to surgically cure rectal carcinoma in the nineteenth century through Miles' operation at the beginning of the twentieth century results were not satisfactory due to high number of local recurrences after resections for rectal cancer. Progress in surgical technique and knowledge of anatomy and embryology of the rectum led to development of TME. Principle of TME is surprisingly simple: removal of the rectum with complete embryonic space containing lymph nodes which are site of primary dissemination of the disease. Main advantages and drawbacks of TME as well as focus on newer procedures developed from the concept of TME are presented in the form of a review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Votava
- Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D. Kachlik
- Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J. Hoch
- Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
TaTME Guidance Group representing the ESCP (European Society of Coloproctology), in collaboration with the ASCRS (American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons), ACPGBI (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), ECCO (European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation), EAES (European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons), ESSO (European Society of Surgical Oncology), CSCRS (Canadian Society of Colorectal Surgery), CNSCRS (Chinese Society of Colorectal Surgery), CSLES (Chinese Society of Laparo-Endoscopic Surgery), CSSANZ (Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand), JSES (Japanese Society of Endoscopic Surgery), SACP (Argentinian Society of Coloproctology), SAGES (Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons), SBCP (Brazilian Society of Coloproctology), Swiss-MIS (Swiss Association for Minimally Invasive Surgery). International expert consensus guidance on indications, implementation and quality measures for transanal total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:749-55. [PMID: 32441803 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM To provide dynamic guidance from a rigorous and up-to-date consensus on the safe implementation and application of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) from an international panel of expert surgeons and educationalists supported by 14 international surgical societies. METHOD An adapted Delphi method and focus group discussion approach was implemented for this consensus process, with expert advice from a guidelines methodologist. Statements were generated focusing on three main topics relating to the safe implementation of TaTME: (1) indications, (2) quality and outcome measures, (3) training and implementation of TaTME. RESULTS Five rounds of the Delphi consensus process were completed over a 13-month period. A total of 56 surgeons experienced in TaTME and surgical education participated in this project. By Delphi round four, 80.0% or greater agreement was reached for all statements except for two, which were further reviewed during a fifth round. More complex cases that are likely to benefit from TaTME were identified, with the recommendation that they should be referred to TaTME expert centres. The most agreed upon definition of expert centres is outlined. CONCLUSION We have provided a current framework of best practice related to implementation of TaTME. The statements are not indefinite and will continue to be 'dynamic' and updated as new evidence emerges.
Collapse
|
23
|
Douissard J, Obias V, Johnson CS, Hagen ME, Keller D, Ouellette JR, Hellan M. Totally robotic vs hybrid abdominoperineal resection: A retrospective multicenter analysis. Int J Med Robot 2019; 16:e2073. [PMID: 31876089 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) for low rectal cancers is technically demanding. Robotic assistance may be of help and can be hybrid (HAPR) or totally robotic (RAPR). The present study describes outcomes of robotic APR and compares both approaches. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multicentric retrospective analysis of rectal cancer patients undergoing either HAPR or RAPR was conducted. Patients' demographics, surgeons' experience, oncologic results, and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were collected. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five patients were included, 48 in HAPR group and 77 in RAPR group. Demographics and comorbidities were comparable. Operative time was reduced in RAPR group (266.9 ± 107.8 min vs 318.9 ± 75.1 min, P = .001). RAPR patients were discharged home more frequently (91.18% vs 66.67%, P = .001), and experienced fewer parastomal hernias (3.71% vs 9.86%, P = .001). CONCLUSION RAPR is safe and feasible with appropriate oncologic outcomes. Totally robotic approach reduces operative time and may improve functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Douissard
- Visceral Surgery Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Obias
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | | | - Monika E Hagen
- Visceral Surgery Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Keller
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - James R Ouellette
- Surgical Oncology Division, Wright State University - Boonshoft School of Medicine, Centerville, Ohio
| | - Minia Hellan
- Wright State University - Boonshoft School of Medicine, Kettering Cancer Care, Kettering, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality, prolonged length of stay, higher readmission rates, the potential need for further operative interventions, and unintended permanent stomas; resulting in increased hospital costs and resource use, and decreased quality of life. This review article is to present definition, diagnosis and management strategies for AL after rectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Yao Tsai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung
| | - William Tzu-Liang Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Aiba T, Uehara K, Aoba T, Hiramatsu K, Kato T, Nagino M. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: A pilot study during the introductory period at a local municipal hospital. J Anus Rectum Colon 2019; 3:27-35. [PMID: 31559364 PMCID: PMC6752129 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2017-039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this pilot study was to confirm the safety and feasibility of the induction of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery (RRS) at a local municipal hospital. A municipal hospital does not indicate a small hospital. The most significant difference between a municipal hospital and a center or university hospital is that most surgeons in a municipal hospital are general surgeons. METHODS The first 30 patients who underwent RRS at the municipal hospital were enrolled between April 2015 and June 2016. All surgeries were performed by a single trained surgeon using the da VinciⓇ Si surgical system. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative major complications. RESULTS Of the study patients, 29 had adenocarcinoma and 1 had ulcerative colitis. The surgical procedures included anterior resection (n = 22), intersphincteric resection (n = 2), abdominoperineal resection (n = 4), Hartmann's procedure (n = 1), and total coloproctectomy (n = 1). There were no intraoperative complications and conversion cases. The median operative time and blood loss were 283.5 min and 9 ml, respectively. The incidence rate of postoperative major complications was 10%, which included anastomotic leakage in 2 patients and ileus in 1 patient. Postoperative urinary dysfunction did not occur in any patient. Complete resection was achieved for all patients. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that the induction of RRS was safe and feasible, even at a local municipal hospital, given that the surgeons had the sufficient skills and experience in both laparoscopic and colorectal surgery. *The study protocol was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000017022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshisada Aiba
- Department of General Surgery, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Aichi, Japan.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Keisuke Uehara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Taro Aoba
- Department of General Surgery, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Hiramatsu
- Department of General Surgery, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takehito Kato
- Department of General Surgery, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masato Nagino
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Oldani A, Cesana G, Uccelli M, Ciccarese F, Giorgi R, De Carli SM, Villa R, Olmi S. Surgical Outcomes of Rectal Resection: Our 10 Years Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29:820-825. [PMID: 30676247 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer, one of the most common tumor- and cancer-related deaths worldwide, requires a multidisciplinary management including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is gaining popularity due to its safety profile and good oncological results, if performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers. This study describes our 10 years experience in minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery. Methods: We have retrospectively evaluated a series of 140 patients treated with laparoscopic approach for rectal malignant and benign diseases. Results: A total of 134 patients (95.7%) underwent anterior rectal resection, in the remaining 6 cases (4.3%) abdominoperineal amputation was performed. All but 13 cases have been treated with laparoscopic approach, with conversion rate of 5.7%. Postoperative morbidity rate was 8.6% (2 cases of peritoneal bleeding and 10 cases of anastomotic fistulae; in 2 cases, fistula occurred in patients previously treated with chemoradiation). Conclusions: Conventional laparoscopy can provide adequate oncological outcomes even in patients with advanced rectal cancer, with advantages in terms of postoperative hospital stay, recovery time, acceptable operative time, and low complication and conversion rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Oldani
- Department of General Surgery and Oncological Surgery, Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery Center, Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia (BG), Italy
| | - Giovanni Cesana
- Department of General Surgery and Oncological Surgery, Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery Center, Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia (BG), Italy
| | - Matteo Uccelli
- Department of General Surgery and Oncological Surgery, Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery Center, Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia (BG), Italy
| | - Francesca Ciccarese
- Department of General Surgery and Oncological Surgery, Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery Center, Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia (BG), Italy
| | - Riccardo Giorgi
- Department of General Surgery and Oncological Surgery, Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery Center, Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia (BG), Italy
| | - Stefano M De Carli
- Department of General Surgery and Oncological Surgery, Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery Center, Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia (BG), Italy
| | - Roberta Villa
- Department of General Surgery and Oncological Surgery, Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery Center, Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia (BG), Italy
| | - Stefano Olmi
- Department of General Surgery and Oncological Surgery, Advanced Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery Center, Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia (BG), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kawai K, Hata K, Tanaka T, Nishikawa T, Otani K, Murono K, Sasaki K, Kaneko M, Emoto S, Nozawa H. Learning Curve of Robotic Rectal Surgery With Lateral Lymph Node Dissection: Cumulative Sum and Multiple Regression Analyses. J Surg Educ 2018; 75:1598-1605. [PMID: 29907462 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 04/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the learning curve of robotic rectal surgery, a procedure that has gained increasing focus in recent years because it is expected that the advanced devices used in this approach provide advantages resulting in a shorter learning curve than that of laparoscopic surgery. However, no studies have assessed the learning curve of robotic rectal surgery, especially when lateral lymph node dissection is required. DESIGN This was a nonrandomized, retrospective study from a single institution. SETTING All consecutive patients who underwent robotic rectal or sigmoid colon surgery by a single surgeon between February 2012 and July 2016 in the University of Tokyo Hospital were enrolled. The learning curve for console time was assessed using a cumulative sum analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. PARTICIPANTS A total of 131 consecutive patients underwent robotic rectal or sigmoid colon surgery performed by a single experienced surgeon. Of these, 41 patients received lateral lymph node dissection. RESULTS A cumulative sum plot for console time demonstrated that the learning period could be divided into 3 phases: Phase I, Cases 1 to 19; Phase II, Cases 20 to 78; and Phase III, Cases 79 to 131. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that console time decreased significantly from one phase to another (Phase I-II, Δconsole time 83.0 minutes; Phase II-III, Δconsole time 40.1 minutes). Other factors affecting console time included body mass index, operative procedure, and lateral lymph node dissection, but not neoadjuvant therapy (such as chemoradiotherapy) or depth of invasion. Lateral lymph node dissection required an additional 138.4 minutes. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the first phase of the learning curve consists of the first 19 cases, which seems sufficient to master the manipulation of robotic arms and to understand spatial relationships unique to the robotic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazushige Kawai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Keisuke Hata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Tanaka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nishikawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensuke Otani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manabu Kaneko
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Garfinkle R, Boutros M, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky CA, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Stein B, Feldman LS, Lee L. Clinical and Economic Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Open and Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28:811-818. [PMID: 29451415 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The short-term benefits of laparoscopy for rectal surgery are equivocal. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical and economic impact of an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) for laparoscopic and open rectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who underwent elective rectal resection with primary anastomosis between January 2009 and March 2012 at two tertiary-care, university-affiliated institutions were identified. Patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into four groups, according to surgical approach (laparoscopic [lap] or open) and perioperative management (ERP or conventional care [CC]). Length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and hospital costs were compared. RESULTS A total of 381 patients were included in the analysis (201 open-CC, 34 lap-CC, 38 open-ERP, and 108 lap-ERP). Patients were mostly similar at baseline. ERPs significantly reduced median LOS after both open cases (open-CC 10 days versus open-ERP 7.5 days, P = .003) and laparoscopic cases (lap-CC 5 days versus lap-ERP 4.5 days, P = .046). ERPs also reduced variability in LOS compared with CC. There was no difference in postoperative complications with the use of ERPs (open-CC 51% versus open-ERP 50%, P = .419; lap-CC 32% versus lap-ERP 36%, P = .689). On multivariate analysis, both ERP (-3.6 days [95% confidence interval, CI -6.0 to -1.3]) and laparoscopy (-3.6 days [95% CI -5.9 to -1.0]) were independently associated with decreased LOS. Overall costs were only lower when lap-ERP was compared with open-CC (mean difference -2420 CAN$ [95% CI -5628 to -786]). CONCLUSIONS ERPs reduced LOS after rectal resections, and the combination of laparoscopy and ERPs significantly reduced overall costs compared to when neither strategy was used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Garfinkle
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marylise Boutros
- 2 Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gabriela Ghitulescu
- 2 Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carol-Ann Vasilevsky
- 2 Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patrick Charlebois
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sender Liberman
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Barry Stein
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- 1 Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dinaux AM, Leijssen LGJ, Bordeianou LG, Kunitake H, Berger DL. Effects of local multivisceral resection for clinically locally advanced rectal cancer on long-term outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:1323-1329. [PMID: 29205364 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multivisceral resection is occasionally needed to obtain clear margins in patients with transmural rectal cancer. Most series demonstrate equivalent outcomes between those patients who undergo multivisceral resections and those who do not, provided an R0-resection is achieved. This study focuses solely on patients who received neoadjuvant treatment for clinically transmural rectal cancers and underwent a local multivisceral R0-resection. METHODS A retrospective, single center analysis of consecutive series of patients who received a surgical R0-resection after neoadjuvant treatment for a clinically transmural, non-metastatic, primary rectal cancer. All patients were operated on between 2004 and 2015. RESULTS A total of 279 patients was included, of whom 29 patients underwent a local multivisceral R0-resection (LMVR). These patients were more often female and less often diagnosed through screening. Pathologic AJCC-staging was significantly lower for non-LMVR patients, with more favorable tumor characteristics. LMVR patients demonstrated higher rates of distant disease recurrence, and impaired survival, even after adjusting for disease stage. CONCLUSION An R0-resection after neoadjuvant therapy led to comparative local control of disease; however, patients with multivisceral resection had more distant recurrence and impaired survival, compared to those did not undergo a multivisceral resection. Further research should determine optimal postoperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M Dinaux
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lieve G J Leijssen
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Liliana G Bordeianou
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hiroko Kunitake
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David L Berger
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal surgery is a devastating complication; decreased blood perfusion is an important risk factor. Surgeons rely on subjective measures to assess bowel perfusion. Fluorescence imaging (FI) with indocyanine green (ICG) provides a real-time objective assessment of intestinal perfusion. Areas covered: A PubMed search using the terms 'fluorescence imaging', 'indocyanine green', 'colon and rectal surgery' was undertaken. Sixteen articles between 2010 to present were identified. Main outcomes were leak rate reduction, change in surgical plan, and technical feasibility. Change in surgical strategy due to FI was recorded in 11 studies. Two case control studies showed overall reduction of 4% and 12% in AL rate and one showed no change in AL rate between groups. Expert commentary: According to the available literature, FI is technically feasible and alters surgical strategy in a non-negligible number of patients possibly effecting AL rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Mizrahi
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Cleveland Clinic Florida , Weston , FL , USA
| | - Steven D Wexner
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Cleveland Clinic Florida , Weston , FL , USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wasmuth HH, Rekstad LC, Tranø G. The outcome and the frequency of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy in curative resections for advanced rectal cancer: a population-based study. Colorectal Dis 2016. [PMID: 26201935 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Pathological complete response (ypCR) after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer is associated with favourable survival and a low rate of local recurrence. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of ypCR among patients with advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative resection and to explore factors associated with survival. METHOD From 2000 to 2009, 1384 patients enrolled in the national population- based colorectal cancer registry of Norway with advanced T3 and T4 rectal cancer with N0-2, M0 received neoadjuvant long-course (chemo)radiation. The duration of follow-up was a median of 5 years. RESULTS ypCR was achieved in 147 (10.6%) patients. The estimated 5-year overall survival rate was 87% (confidence interval ± 5.4) among ypCR and 67% among non-ypCR (confidence interval ± 2.7) (P < 0.0001). Distant metastasis developed in 12 (8%) of 147 and 328 (26.5%) of 1237 patients respectively (P < 0.001). In a Cox proportional hazards ratio model the effect of ypCR on survival was adjusted for age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.056, P = 0.0001], metachronous metastasis (HR 4.7, P = 0.0001), local recurrence (HR 4.3, P = 0.0001) and surgical procedure (HR 1.48, P = 0.0001). The independent effect of ypCR (HR 0.65, P = 0.041) on survival almost disappeared compared with the univariate analysis. CONCLUSION The rate of ypCR in advanced rectal cancer was about 10%. This phenomenon seems to occur in tumours with a low risk of metastasizing. The contribution of neoadjuvant therapy to ypCR on survival was small or absent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H H Wasmuth
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - L C Rekstad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - G Tranø
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
AIM Faecal incontinence may occur following rectal surgery and/or radiotherapy for rectal cancer. The aim of this paper was to review the evidence to support the use of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for patients with incontinence who had undergone rectal surgery or received rectal radiotherapy. METHOD A search was performed of PubMed, Medline and Embase. All studies which reported the outcome of SNS in patients who had undergone a rectal resection or radiotherapy were reviewed. RESULTS The first report of SNS following rectal surgery was in 2002. Since then seven further studies have described its effect in patients who have undergone anterior resection or pelvic radiotherapy. The total number of patients was 57. All studies were single group series, which ranged in size from one to 15 patients. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 36 months. The success of peripheral nerve evaluation ranged from 47% to 100%. Permanent SNS improved the symptoms and in some studies this was reflected in improved quality of life. The wide variation of patient factors, operations performed, the dose of radiotherapy given and time from operation makes interpretation of the results difficult. CONCLUSION Larger studies with better patient selection are needed to investigate the effect of SNS on incontinence following radiotherapy or rectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G P Thomas
- Sir Alan Parks Department of Physiology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
| | - E Bradshaw
- Sir Alan Parks Department of Physiology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
| | - C J Vaizey
- Sir Alan Parks Department of Physiology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
AIM The decision to create a stoma after anterior resection has significant consequences. Decisions under uncertainty are made with a variety of cognitive tools, or heuristics. Past experience has been shown to be a powerful heuristic in other domains. Our aim was to identify whether the misfortune of recent anastomotic leakage or surgeon propensity to take everyday risks would affect their decision to defunction a range of anastomoses. METHOD Questionnaires were sent to members of the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand. Participants were asked for demographic information, questions regarding risk-taking propensity, when their last anastomotic leakage occurred and whether they would defunction a range of hypothetical rectal anastomoses grouped according to height, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and use of preoperative radiotherapy. Scores were derived for hypothetical patient likelihood of having a stoma created and individual surgeon propensity for stoma formation. Hazard regression analysis was used to assess demographic predictors of stoma formation. RESULTS In total, 110 (75.3%) of 146 surveyed surgeons replied; 72 (65.5%) reported anastomotic leakage within the last 12 months. Surgeons' propensity for risk-taking was comparable (24.6 vs 27.53, 95% confidence interval, Mann-Whitney-U) to previously studied participants in economic models. Surgeon age (< 50 years) and lower propensity for risk-taking were demonstrated to be independent predictors of stoma formation on regression analysis. CONCLUSION Although the decision to create a stoma after anterior resection may be made in the belief that its foundation derives from rational thought, it appears that other unrecognized operator factors such as age and risk-taking exert an effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E MacDermid
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
de Bruin AFJ, Gosselink MP, van der Harst E, Rutten HJT. Local application of gentamicin collagen implants in the prophylaxis of surgical site infections following gastrointestinal surgery: a review of clinical experience. Tech Coloproctol 2010; 14:301-10. [PMID: 20585822 PMCID: PMC2988990 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-010-0593-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2010] [Accepted: 06/10/2010] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common type of healthcare-associated infection in gastrointestinal (GI) surgical procedures, which often has major consequences for patient recovery and increased healthcare costs due to prolonged hospital stay. This article provides an overview of the efficacy and safety of prophylactic application of resorbable gentamicin-containing collagen implants (GCI) in the prevention of SSI following high-risk GI surgical procedures. METHOD Nine publications were identified using the PubMed online database and search terms 'gentamicin collagen implant' plus 'surgical site infection', 'wound infection' and 'gastrointestinal surgery'. RESULTS Data from 483 patients treated prophylactically have demonstrated that GCI can reduce the wound infection rate in high-risk GI surgical procedures and improve wound healing after pilonidal sinus excision. In a study of 221 patients who underwent colorectal surgery, the wound infection rate was reduced to 5.6% in the GCI group compared to 18.4% in the control group (P < 0.01). GCI also positively influences the post-operative course for patients undergoing particularly risky procedures e.g. abdominoperineal resection (APR) combined with neoadjuvant radiotherapy. In one such patient series, GCI reduced the wound infection rate by over 70% and the length of hospital stay by 40%. Few side effects of GCI were noted in the 9 clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrates that GCI can have a positive effect on wound infection rates in high-risk GI surgery and can also improve wound healing after pilonidal sinus excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A F J de Bruin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Medisch Centrum Rijnmond Zuid, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Olympiaweg 350, 3078 HT, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|