1
|
Smalbroek B, Geitenbeek R, Burghgraef T, Dijksman L, Hol J, Rutgers M, Crolla R, van Geloven N, Leijtens J, Polat F, Pronk A, Verdaasdonk E, Tuynman J, Sietses C, Postma M, Hompes R, Consten E, Smits A. A Cost Overview of Minimally Invasive Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Population-based Cohort in Experienced Centres. Ann Surg Open 2023; 4:e263. [PMID: 37600875 PMCID: PMC10431334 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Total mesorectal excision has been the gold standard for the operative management of rectal cancer. The most frequently used minimally invasive techniques for surgical resection of rectal cancer are laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal excision. As studies comparing the costs of the techniques are lacking, this study aims to provide a cost overview. Method This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent total mesorectal resection between 2015 and 2017 at 11 dedicated centers, which completed the learning curve of the specific technique. The primary outcome was total in-hospital costs of each technique up to 30 days after surgery including all major surgical cost drivers, while taking into account different team approaches in the transanal approach. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization and complication rates. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariable linear regression analysis. Results In total, 949 patients were included, consisting of 446 laparoscopic (47%), 306 (32%) robot-assisted, and 197 (21%) transanal total mesorectal excisions. Total costs were significantly higher for transanal and robot-assisted techniques compared to the laparoscopic technique, with median (interquartile range) for laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal at €10,556 (8,642;13,829), €12,918 (11,196;16,223), and € 13,052 (11,330;16,358), respectively (P < 0.001). Also, the one-team transanal approach showed significant higher operation time and higher costs compared to the two-team approach. Length of stay and postoperative complications did not differ between groups. Conclusion Transanal and robot-assisted approaches show higher costs during 30-day follow-up compared to laparoscopy with comparable short-term clinical outcomes. Two-team transanal approach is associated with lower total costs compared to the transanal one-team approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Smalbroek
- From the Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Ritchie Geitenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lea Dijksman
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hol
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier Crolla
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen Leijtens
- Department of Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Apollo Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emiel Verdaasdonk
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Colin Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, Unit of Global Health, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics & Business, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anke Smits
- From the Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kornmann V, van Ramshorst B, van Dieren S, van Geloven N, Boermeester M, Boerma D. Early complication detection after colorectal surgery (CONDOR): study protocol for a prospective clinical diagnostic study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31:459-64. [PMID: 26670674 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2468-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/03/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anastomotic leakage is one of the most feared complications following colorectal surgery with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Multiple risk factors have been identified, but leakage still occurs. Early detection is crucial in order to reduce morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to create a decision algorithm for early detection of anastomotic leakage. METHODS All patients who undergo elective colorectal surgery for benign or malignant disease are enrolled in this multicenter study. The primary endpoint is the accuracy of the prediction of anastomotic leakage. The main study parameter is the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage. Secondary study parameters are clinical (vital) parameters, additional laboratory or radiology examination, other complications, mortality, re-intervention, duration of hospital and intensive care stay, emergency room visits, readmission to the hospital and total costs. Daily physical examination and each step in clinical decision making will be evaluated prospectively in a standardized manner. The focus of the analysis will be on the added value of diagnostic tools, such as laboratory results and imaging studies, over physical examination by using logistic regression and decision tree analysis. CONCLUSION This study aims to develop an optimal diagnostic algorithm that can act as a guideline for surgeons or surgical residents to early identify patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Kornmann
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Bert van Ramshorst
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Marja Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Poelman M, Apers J, van den Brand H, Cense H, Consten E, Deelder J, Dwars B, van Geloven N, de Lange E, Lange J, Simmermacher R, Simons M, Sonneveld E, Schreurs H, Bonjer J. The INCH-Trial: a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of conventional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for incisional hernia repair. BMC Surg 2013; 13:18. [PMID: 24499061 PMCID: PMC3680330 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2011] [Accepted: 05/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Annually approximately 100.000 patients undergo a laparotomy in the Netherlands. About 15,000 of these patients will develop an incisional hernia. Both open and laparoscopic surgical repair have been proven to be safe. However, the most effective treatment of incisional hernias remains unclear. This study, the 'INCH-trial', comparing cost-effectiveness of open and laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, is therefore needed. METHODS/DESIGN A randomized multi-center clinical trial comparing cost-effectiveness of open and laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Patients with a symptomatic incisional hernia, eligible for laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair. Only surgeons, experienced in both open and laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, will participate in the INCH trial. During incisional hernia repair, a mesh is placed under or on top of the fascia, with a minimal overlap of 5 cm. Primary endpoint is length of hospital stay after an incisional hernia repair. Secondary endpoints are time to full recovery within three months after index surgery, post-operative complications, recurrences, mortality and quality of life.Our hypothesis is that laparoscopic incisional hernia repair comes with a significant shorter hospital stay compared to open incisional hernia repair. A difference of two days is considered significant. One-hunderd-and-thirty-five patients are enrolled in each treatment arm. The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective. Primary outcomes are costs per patient related to time-to-recovery and quality of life.The main goal of the trial is to establish whether laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is superior to conventional open incisional hernia repair in terms of cost-effectiveness. This is measured through length of hospital stay and quality of life. Secondary endpoints are re-operation rate due to post-operative complications or recurrences, mortality and quality of life. DISCUSSION The difference in time to full recovery between the two treatment strategies is thought to be in favor of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is therefore expected to be a more cost-effective approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial register: NTR2808.
Collapse
|