1
|
Pascher A. [Indications and results of intestinal transplantation for short bowel syndrome after mesenteric ischemia]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 95:375-381. [PMID: 38427034 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-024-02052-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the only causal treatment for complicated chronic intestinal failure after mesenteric ischemia and impending failure of parenteral supplementation. Isolated or combined ITx with the inclusion of the intestine is associated with demanding immunological, perioperative and infection associated challenges. AIM The characterization of chronic intestinal failure, the indications, transplant survival, transplantation techniques and success rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS Collection, summary and critical appraisal of international guidelines, the guidelines of the German Medical Chamber, and the international literature. RESULTS The first successful ITx were performed in 1987 and 1988 at the University of Kiel Germany and the University of Pittsburgh, USA. The number of ITx rose continuously but in phases from the end of the 1990s to over 200 per year but has currently decreased to 100-150 per year due to optimized intestinal rehabilitation. While the 1‑year and 3‑year transplant survival rates were 30% and 20% before 1991, they increased in phases up to 60% and 50%, respectively, after 1995 and have now achieved almost 80% and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSION The substantial improvement in the results of ITx can be partly explained by progress in operative techniques, intensive care medicine and a better understanding of mucosal immunity; however, optimized strategies in immunosuppression as well as prevention of infectious diseases and malignancies have also made decisive contributions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Pascher
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Z, Sun B, Yu Y, Liu J, Li D, Lu Y, Liu R. A novel nomogram integrating body composition and inflammatory-nutritional markers for predicting postoperative complications in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Front Nutr 2024; 11:1345570. [PMID: 38706567 PMCID: PMC11066162 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1345570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative complications in adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) significantly escalate healthcare costs and prolong hospital stays. This study endeavors to construct a nomogram that synergizes computed tomography (CT) body composition data with inflammatory-nutritional markers to forecast postoperative complications in ASBO. Methods The study's internal cohort consisted of 190 ASBO patients recruited from October 2017 to November 2021, subsequently partitioned into training (n = 133) and internal validation (n = 57) groups at a 7:3 ratio. An additional external cohort comprised 52 patients. Body composition assessments were conducted at the third lumbar vertebral level utilizing CT images. Baseline characteristics alongside systemic inflammatory responses were meticulously documented. Through univariable and multivariable regression analyses, risk factors pertinent to postoperative complications were identified, culminating in the creation of a predictive nomogram. The nomogram's precision was appraised using the concordance index (C-index) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results Postoperative complications were observed in 65 (48.87%), 26 (45.61%), and 22 (42.31%) patients across the three cohorts, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that nutrition risk score (NRS), intestinal strangulation, skeletal muscle index (SMI), subcutaneous fat index (SFI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) were independently predictive of postoperative complications. These preoperative indicators were integral to the nomogram's formulation. The model, amalgamating body composition and inflammatory-nutritional indices, demonstrated superior performance: the internal training set exhibited a 0.878 AUC (95% CI, 0.802-0.954), 0.755 accuracy, and 0.625 sensitivity; the internal validation set displayed a 0.831 AUC (95% CI, 0.675-0.986), 0.818 accuracy, and 0.812 sensitivity. In the external cohort, the model yielded an AUC of 0.886 (95% CI, 0.799-0.974), 0.808 accuracy, and 0.909 sensitivity. Calibration curves affirmed a strong concordance between predicted outcomes and actual events. Decision curve analysis substantiated that the model could confer benefits on patients with ASBO. Conclusion A rigorously developed and validated nomogram that incorporates body composition and inflammatory-nutritional indices proves to be a valuable tool for anticipating postoperative complications in ASBO patients, thus facilitating enhanced clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhibo Wang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Baoying Sun
- Neurology Department, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Yimiao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Jingnong Liu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Duo Li
- Institute of Nutrition and Health, College of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yun Lu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Ruiqing Liu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Institute of Nutrition and Health, College of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stoop TF, van Bodegraven EA, Ten Haaft BHEA, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, van Zundert SMC, Lambe C, Tabbers MM, Gorter RR. Systematic review on management of high-output enterostomy in children: An urgent call for evidence. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2024; 78:188-196. [PMID: 38374570 DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.12043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND High-output stoma is one of the most common major morbidities in young children with an enterostomy that could lead to intestinal failure. Management of high-output enterostomy in children is mostly based on personal experience. This systematic review aims to clarify the evidence-based therapeutic approach of high-output enterostomy in children. METHODS A systematic review was performed using Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library to identify studies published until March 20, 2023, following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. The study population comprised children (i.e., age <18 years) with high-output enterostomy (i.e., jejuno-, ileo-, and/or colostomy), regardless of underlying aetiology. Interventions comprised any (non)pharmacological and/or surgical treatment. Interventions were compared with each other, placebos, and/or no interventions. Primary outcome was reduction of enterostomy output. Secondary outcomes were morbidity, mortality, quality of life, associated healthcare costs, and adverse events. RESULTS The literature search identified 4278 original articles of which 366 were screened on full text, revealing that none of the articles met the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION This first systematic review on management of high-output enterostomy in children revealed that any evidence on the primary and secondary outcomes is lacking. There is an urgent need for evidence on conservative treatment strategies including fluid restrictions, dietary advices, oral rehydration solution, chyme re-infusion, and pharmacological and surgical treatments of high-output enterostomy in children, aiming to reduce the risk for short- and long-term complications. Till more evidence is available, a systematic and multidisciplinary step-up approach is needed. Therefore, a therapeutic work-up is proposed that could guide the care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Surgical Center of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Eduard A van Bodegraven
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Surgical Center of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Britte H E A Ten Haaft
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Surgical Center of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Suzanne M C van Zundert
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile Lambe
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Intestinal Failure Rehabilitation Center, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Merit M Tabbers
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ramon R Gorter
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Surgical Center of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baker DM, Chapman SJ, Thomas BD, Thompson BJ, Hawkins DJ, Arnott R, Blackwell S, Thorpe G, Harji DP, Jones GL, Lee MJ. Formation of a conceptual framework during the development of a patient-reported outcome measure for early gastrointestinal recovery: phase I of the PRO-diGi study. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:2024-2032. [PMID: 37602877 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
AIM Patients admitted to hospital for abdominal surgery often experience gastrointestinal dysfunction. Many studies have reported outcomes following gastrointestinal dysfunction, yet there is no unified definition of recovery or a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The first stage of PROM development requires formation of a conceptual framework to identify key themes to patients. The aim of this study was to utilize semistructured interviews to identify core themes and concepts relevant to patients to facilitate development of a conceptual framework. METHOD Adult patients admitted to hospital for major gastrointestinal, urological or gynaecological surgery, in an emergency or elective setting, were eligible to participate. Patients treated nonoperatively for small bowel obstruction were also eligible. Interviews were conducted by telephone, audio-recorded, transcribed, coded and analysed using NVivo software by two researchers and reviewed by lay members of the steering group. Interviews continued until data saturation was reached. Ethical approval was gained prior to interviews (21/WA/0231). RESULTS Twenty nine interviews were completed (17 men, median age 64 years) across three specialties (20 gastrointestinal, six gynaecological, three urological). Two overarching themes of 'general recovery' and 'gastrointestinal symptoms' were identified. General recovery included three themes: 'life impact', 'mental impact', including anxiety, and 'physical impact', including fatigue. Gastrointestinal symptoms included three themes: 'abdominal symptoms' such as pain, 'diet and appetite' and 'expulsory function', such as stool frequency. A total of 18 gastrointestinal symptoms were identified during patient recovery-many of which lasted several weeks following discharge. CONCLUSION This study reports a range of gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal symptoms experienced by patients during early gastrointestinal recovery. Identified symptoms have been synthesized into a conceptual framework to enable development of a definitive PROM for early gastrointestinal recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Baker
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Benjamin D Thomas
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Benjamin J Thompson
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Deborah J Hawkins
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, Sheffield, UK
| | - Robert Arnott
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Patient Representative, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Gabrielle Thorpe
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Deena P Harji
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Matthew J Lee
- Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, Sheffield, UK
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pironi L, Cuerda C, Jeppesen PB, Joly F, Jonkers C, Krznarić Ž, Lal S, Lamprecht G, Lichota M, Mundi MS, Schneider SM, Szczepanek K, Van Gossum A, Wanten G, Wheatley C, Weimann A. ESPEN guideline on chronic intestinal failure in adults - Update 2023. Clin Nutr 2023; 42:1940-2021. [PMID: 37639741 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS In 2016, ESPEN published the guideline for Chronic Intestinal Failure (CIF) in adults. An updated version of ESPEN guidelines on CIF due to benign disease in adults was devised in order to incorporate new evidence since the publication of the previous ESPEN guidelines. METHODS The grading system of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) was used to grade the literature. Recommendations were graded according to the levels of evidence available as A (strong), B (conditional), 0 (weak) and Good practice points (GPP). The recommendations of the 2016 guideline (graded using the GRADE system) which were still valid, because no studies supporting an update were retrieved, were reworded and re-graded accordingly. RESULTS The recommendations of the 2016 guideline were reviewed, particularly focusing on definitions, and new chapters were included to devise recommendations on IF centers, chronic enterocutaneous fistulas, costs of IF, caring for CIF patients during pregnancy, transition of patients from pediatric to adult centers. The new guideline consist of 149 recommendations and 16 statements which were voted for consensus by ESPEN members, online in July 2022 and at conference during the annual Congress in September 2022. The Grade of recommendation is GPP for 96 (64.4%) of the recommendations, 0 for 29 (19.5%), B for 19 (12.7%), and A for only five (3.4%). The grade of consensus is "strong consensus" for 148 (99.3%) and "consensus" for one (0.7%) recommendation. The grade of consensus for the statements is "strong consensus" for 14 (87.5%) and "consensus" for two (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS It is confirmed that CIF management requires complex technologies, multidisciplinary and multiprofessional activity, and expertise to care for the underlying gastrointestinal disease and to provide HPN support. Most of the recommendations were graded as GPP, but almost all received a strong consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loris Pironi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Center for Chronic Intestinal Failure, IRCCS AOUBO, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Cristina Cuerda
- Nutrition Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Francisca Joly
- Center for Intestinal Failure, Department of Gastroenterology and Nutritional Support, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Cora Jonkers
- Nutrition Support Team, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Željko Krznarić
- Center of Clinical Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Simon Lal
- Intestinal Failure Unit, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Marek Lichota
- Intestinal Failure Patients Association "Appetite for Life", Cracow, Poland
| | - Manpreet S Mundi
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Kinga Szczepanek
- General and Oncology Surgery Unit, Stanley Dudrick's Memorial Hospital, Skawina, Poland
| | | | - Geert Wanten
- Intestinal Failure Unit, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Carolyn Wheatley
- Support and Advocacy Group for People on Home Artificial Nutrition (PINNT), United Kingdom
| | - Arved Weimann
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, St. George Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O’Connor T, MacKenzie L, Clarke RW, Bradburn M, Wilson TR, Lee MJ. Screening for malnutrition in emergency laparotomy patients: a comparison of three tools. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2023; 105:413-421. [PMID: 36541125 PMCID: PMC10149256 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malnourished patients undergoing emergency laparotomy are at risk of significant morbidity. The optimum screening tool to identify such patients in practice and research is yet to be determined. This study aims to compare the performance of three nutrition risk tools in predicting time without enteral nutrition in this population. METHODS A prospective cohort study (NCT04696367) was conducted across two sites, recruiting patients undergoing National Emergency Laparotomy Audit eligible procedures. Data collected included demographics, diagnosis, procedure and outcomes. Nutrition risk was assessed using three tools: Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score, Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) and Nutritional Risk Score 2002 (NRS-2002). Complications were assessed with the Comprehensive Complication Index. Quality of life was measured at baseline and 5 days postsurgery using EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS A total of 59 patients were recruited. Median age was 69 years. Of the 59 participants, 23 were judged high risk using MUST score, 13 using NRS and 8 using NRI. Median time to restart enteral intake was 7 days (interquartile range 7-14). Time without intake was correlated with increasing score using MUST (r=0.463, p<0.001) and NRS-2002 (r=0.296, p=0.03) but not NRI (r=-0.121, p=0.38). High-risk nutritional groups also had increased length of hospital stay, but not complication scores. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy spend a prolonged time without enteral nutrition. Although all nutritional tools demonstrated some propensity to identify patients at higher risk of needing nutritional support, their performance was variable. Nevertheless, some may be useful in future clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T O’Connor
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - L MacKenzie
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - RW Clarke
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - M Bradburn
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - TR Wilson
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Luton OW, Mortimer M, Hopkins L, Robinson DBT, Egeler C, Smart NJ, Harries R. Is there a role for botulinum toxin A in the emergency setting for delayed abdominal wall closure in the management of the open abdomen? A systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2023; 105:306-313. [PMID: 35174720 PMCID: PMC10066655 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emergency laparotomy for either trauma or non-trauma indications is common and management is varied. Use of the open abdomen technique allowing for planned re-look is an option; however, performing delayed definitive fascial closure (DFC) following this can be a challenge. The use of botulinum toxin-A (BTX) infiltration into the lateral abdominal wall has been well documented within the elective setting; its use within the emergency setting is undecided. This systematic review assesses the efficacy and safety of BTX injection into the lateral abdominal wall muscles in the emergency setting. The primary outcome is DFC rate. METHODS Systematic review was performed according to the PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42020205130). Papers were dual screened for eligibility, and included if they met pre-stated criteria where the primary outcome was DFC. Articles reporting fewer than five cases were excluded. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and Joanna Brigg's appraisal tools. FINDINGS Fourteen studies were screened for eligibility, twelve full texts were reviewed and two studies were included. Both studies showed evidence of bias due to confounding factors and lack of reporting. Both studies suggested significantly higher rates of DFC than reported in the literature against standard technique (90.7% vs 66%); however, these data are difficult to interpret due to strict study inclusion criteria or lack of a control population. CONCLUSION The use of BTX is deemed safe and its effects in the emergency situation may have great potential. Unfortunately, to date, there is insufficient evidence to facilitate opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- OW Luton
- Health Education and Improvement Wales, UK
| | | | - L Hopkins
- Health Education and Improvement Wales, UK
| | | | - C Egeler
- Swansea Bay University Health Board, UK
| | - NJ Smart
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - R Harries
- Swansea Bay University Health Board, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Timmer AS, Claessen JJM, Boermeester MA. Risk Factor-Driven Prehabilitation Prior to Abdominal Wall Reconstruction to Improve Postoperative Outcome. A Narrative Review. JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY : JAWS 2022; 1:10722. [PMID: 38314165 PMCID: PMC10831687 DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2022.10722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
All abdominal wall reconstructions find themselves on a scale, varying between simple to highly complex procedures. The level of complexity depends on many factors that are divided into patient comorbidities, hernia characteristics, and wound characteristics. Preoperative identification of modifiable risk factors provides the opportunity for patient optimization. Because this so called prehabilitation greatly improves postoperative outcome, reconstructive surgery should not be scheduled before all modifiable risk factors are optimized to a point where no further improvement can be expected. In this review, we discuss the importance of preoperative risk factor recognition, identify modifiable risk factors, and utilize options for patient prehabilitation, all aiming to improve postoperative outcome and therewith long-term success of the reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allard S. Timmer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J. M. Claessen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marja A. Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McKee RF, Knight K, Leitch EF, Stevens P. The role of surgery in weaning patients from home parenteral support - A cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:621-630. [PMID: 35066961 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Some patients with intestinal failure requiring home parenteral support (HPS) may be weaned. This study considered all abdominal surgery in a cohort of HPS patients over a 25-year period. Our aim was to identify how many patients can be weaned from HPS and by what means, and to identify what makes weaning more likely. METHOD A prospectively collected database of HPS patients to December 2018 was analysed for outcomes of care. RESULTS At 5 years 56% of 205 patients remained on HPS. Fifty eight patients (28%), who had 68 operations, stopped HPS after surgery. Patients stopping HPS had a longer median final small bowel length (155 cm, range 45-350 cm) and were more likely to have colon in circuit (84%) than patients who had reconstructive surgery but did not stop HPS (median small bowel length 50 cm, range 15-135 cm; 50% colon in circuit). The median period between HPS discharge and reconstructive surgery was 238 days. There were no deaths, but 18 Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4 complications occurred within 30 days. Ninety per cent of patients who stopped HPS survived for 5 years from the start of HPS in comparison with 53% of those who remained on HPS. CONCLUSIONS No previous study has examined surgery in an entire cohort of HPS patients. More than a quarter of HPS patients can be weaned after reconstructive surgery. The length of bowel available for recruitment at surgery is the main determinant of the ability to stop HPS. The possibility of reconstruction should be considered, since patients who stop HPS appear to have a survival advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth F McKee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Katrina Knight
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - E Fiona Leitch
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Phil Stevens
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Williams KJ, Donnelly S, Gabe S, Gupta A, Holman R, Preston S, Vaizey CJ, Corr A, Mehta AM. Standardized documentation and synoptic reporting of complex intestinal anatomy in enteric fistulation and intestinal failure. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:530-534. [PMID: 34860451 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/06/2022]
Abstract
AIM In intestinal failure, delineation of both structure and function are key to controlling symptoms and planning further intervention. We have developed a template for developing an 'anatomy at a glance' patient-specific map to aid decision making and counselling. METHOD A core dataset was developed and used to create an editable template to demonstrate the gastrointestinal tract, its relationship to the genitourinary tract, and specific anterior abdominal wall features. This was then used to create an anatomical template, specific to each patient, and stored in the electronic patient record and imaging archive. RESULTS We have developed a technique for integration of multi-modal information into one diagram, easily referenced by the multidisciplinary team. Radiology, endoscopy and previous operation notes can be used to fill out a core dataset, which is then transposed into a standardized template. A worked example is shown. CONCLUSION The mapping template has been successfully integrated into practice and aided decision making at all stages of the patient's therapeutic journey. It has been found helpful in planning routes of nutrition, preoperative optimization, surgical planning, interpreting postoperative imaging and managing patient expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine J Williams
- Lennard-Jones Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Suzanne Donnelly
- Lennard-Jones Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Simon Gabe
- Lennard-Jones Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Arun Gupta
- Department of Gastrointestinal Imaging, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Richard Holman
- Lennard-Jones Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Stephen Preston
- Multimedia and Audiovisual Services, St Mark's Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Carolynne J Vaizey
- Lennard-Jones Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alison Corr
- Department of Gastrointestinal Imaging, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Akash M Mehta
- Lennard-Jones Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Joosten JJ, Longchamp G, Khan MF, Lameris W, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA, Cahill RA, Hompes R, Ris F. The use of fluorescence angiography to assess bowel viability in the acute setting: an international, multi-centre case series. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7369-7375. [PMID: 35199204 PMCID: PMC9485089 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09136-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Assessing bowel viability can be challenging during acute surgical procedures, especially regarding mesenteric ischaemia. Intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA) may be a valuable tool for the surgeon to determine whether bowel resection is necessary and to define the most appropriate resection margins. The aim of this study is to report on FA use in the acute setting and to judge its impact on intraoperative decision making. Materials and methods This is a multi-centre, retrospective case series of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery between February 2016 and 2021 in three general/colorectal units where intraoperative FA was performed to assess bowel viability. Primary endpoint was change of management after the FA assessment. Results A total of 93 patients (50 males, 66.6 ± 19.2 years, ASA score ≥ III in 85%) were identified and studied. Initial surgical approach was laparotomy in 66 (71%) patients and laparoscopy in 27 (29% and seven, 26% conversions). The most common aetiologies were mesenteric ischaemia (n = 42, 45%) and adhesional/herniae-related strangulation (n = 41, 44%). In 50 patients a bowel resection was performed. Overall rates of anastomosis after resection, reoperation and 30-day mortality were 48% (n = 24/50, one leak), 12% and 18%, respectively. FA changed management in 27 (29%) patients. In four patients (4% overall), resection was avoided and in 21 (23%) extra bowel length was preserved (median 50 cm of bowel saved, IQR 28–98) although three patients developed further ischaemia. FA prompted extended resection (median of 20 cm, IQR 10–50 extra bowel) in six (6%) patients. Conclusion Intraoperative use of FA impacts surgical decisions regarding bowel resection for intestinal ischaemia, potentially enabling bowel preservation in approximately one out of four patients. Prospective studies are needed to optimize the best use of this technology for this indication and to determine standards for the interpretation of FA images and the potential subsequent need for second-look surgeries. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09136-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna J Joosten
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Grégoire Longchamp
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mohammad F Khan
- Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University, Hospital, 47 Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - Wytze Lameris
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wilhelmus A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronan A Cahill
- Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University, Hospital, 47 Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.,UCD Centre for Precision Surgery, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Frédéric Ris
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sobocki J, Jackowski M, Dziki A, Tarnowski W, Banasiewicz T, Kunecki M, Słodkowski M, Stanisławski M, Zaczek Z, Richer P, Matyja A, Frączek M, Wallner G. Clinical guidelines for the management of gastrointestinal fistula
– developed by experts of the Polish Surgical Society. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.0499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Gastrointestinal fistula is one of the most difficult problems in gastrointestinal surgery. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality, numerous complications, prolonged hospitalization, and high cost of treatment. </br>Aim: This project aimed to develop recommendations for the treatment of gastrointestinal fistulas, based on evidence-based medicine and best clinical practice to reduce treatment-related mortality and morbidity. </br>Material and methods: The preparation of these recommendations is based on a review of the literature from the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases from 1.01.2010 to 31.12.2020, with particular emphasis on systematic reviews and clinical recommendations of recognized scientific societies. Recommendations in the form of a directive were formulated and assessed using the Delphi method. </br>Results and conclusions: Nine recommendations were presented along with a discussion and comments of experts. Treatment should be managed by a multidisciplinary team (surgeon, anesthetist, clinical nutritionist/dietician, nurse, pharmacist, endoscopist).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacek Sobocki
- Department of General Surgery and Clinical Nutrition, Postgraduate Medical Education Center, Warsaw, Poland; Head: Jacek Sobocki MD PhD, CMPK Professor
| | - Marek Jackowski
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Collegium Mediucm at the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland; Head: prof. Marek Jackowski MD PhD
| | - Adam Dziki
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Poland; Head: prof. Adam Dziki MD PhD
| | - Wiesław Tarnowski
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Postgraduate Medical Education Center, Warsaw, Poland; Head: prof. Wiesław Tarnowski MD PhD
| | - Tomasz Banasiewicz
- Department of General Surgery, Endocrine Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Institute of Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland; Head: prof. Tomasz Banasiewicz MD PhD
| | - Marek Kunecki
- General and Vascular Surgery Unit, Center for Nutritional Therapy, M. Pirogow Regional Specialist Hospital, Lodz, Poland; Head: Marek Kunecki MD PhD
| | - Maciej Słodkowski
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland; Head: Maciej Słodkowski MD PhD
| | - Michał Stanisławski
- Department of General Surgery and Clinical Nutrition, Postgraduate Medical Education Center, Warsaw, Poland; Head: Jacek Sobocki MD PhD, CMPK Professor
| | - Zuzanna Zaczek
- Department of General Surgery and Clinical Nutrition, Postgraduate Medical Education Center, Warsaw, Poland; Head: Jacek Sobocki MD PhD, CMPK Professor
| | - Piotr Richer
- Department and Clinical Unit of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Transplantology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland; Head: prof. Piotr Richter MD PhD
| | - Andrzej Matyja
- II Department of Surgery, Clinical Unit of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Metabolic Surgery and Emergency Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland; Head: prof. Andrzej Matyja, MD PhD
| | - Mariusz Frączek
- II Department and Clinic of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery and Surgical Oncology at the Medical University of Warsaw, Poland; Head: prof. Mariusz Frączek MD PhD
| | - Grzegorz Wallner
- II Department and Clinic of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery and Gastrointestinal Neoplasia, Medical University of Lublin, Poland; Head: prof. Grzegorz Wallner MD PhD
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Adamina M, Feakins R, Iacucci M, Spinelli A, Cannatelli R, D'Hoore A, Driessen A, Katsanos K, Mookhoek A, Myrelid P, Pellino G, Peros G, Tontini GE, Tripathi M, Yanai H, Svrcek M. ECCO Topical Review Optimising Reporting in Surgery, Endoscopy, and Histopathology. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:1089-1105. [PMID: 33428711 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] requires a lifelong multidisciplinary approach. The quality of medical reporting is crucial in this context. The present topical review addresses the need for optimised reporting in endoscopy, surgery, and histopathology. METHODS A consensus expert panel consisting of gastroenterologists, surgeons, and pathologists, convened by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation, performed a systematic literature review. The following topics were covered: in endoscopy: [i] general IBD endoscopy; [ii] disease activity and surveillance; [iii] endoscopy treatment in IBD; in surgery: [iv] medical history with surgical relevance, surgical indication, and strategy; [v] operative approach; [vi] intraoperative disease description; [vii] operative steps; in pathology: [viii] macroscopic assessment and interpretation of resection specimens; [ix] IBD histology, including biopsies, surgical resections, and neoplasia; [x] IBD histology conclusion and report. Statements were developed using a Delphi methodology incorporating two consecutive rounds. Current practice positions were set when ≥ 80% of participants agreed on a recommendation. RESULTS Thirty practice positions established a standard terminology for optimal reporting in endoscopy, surgery, and histopathology. Assessment of disease activity, surveillance recommendations, advice to surgeons for operative indication and strategies, including margins and extent of resection, and diagnostic criteria of IBD, as well as guidance for the interpretation of dysplasia and cancer, were handled. A standardised report including a core set of items to include in each specialty report, was defined. CONCLUSIONS Interdisciplinary high-quality care requires thorough and standardised reporting across specialties. This topical review offers an actionable framework and practice recommendations to optimise reporting in endoscopy, surgery, and histopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Roger Feakins
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, UK.,Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, UK
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano,Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Cannatelli
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Gastroenterology Unit, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Driessen
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, University Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Konstantinos Katsanos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University and Medical School of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Aart Mookhoek
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Surgery, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universitá degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.,Colorectal Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Georgios Peros
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Winterthur, Switerland; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Eugenio Tontini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Monika Tripathi
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Henit Yanai
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Magali Svrcek
- Department of Pathology, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Saint-Antoine hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Outcomes of mid-term and long-term degradable biosynthetic meshes in single-stage open complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia 2021; 25:1647-1657. [PMID: 34097187 PMCID: PMC8182350 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02415-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess clinical outcomes in patients that underwent open single-stage complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) with biosynthetic mesh. METHODS Retrospective observational study of two prospectively registered series of consecutive patients undergoing CAWR with either long-term degradable (LTD) Phasix™ or mid-term degradable (MTD) BIO-A® biosynthetic mesh in a single institution between June 2016 and December 2019. RESULTS From 169 patients with CAWR, 70 consecutive patients were identified who underwent CAWR with either LTD or MTD biosynthetic mesh. More than 85% of patients had an incisional hernia that could be classified as moderately complex to major complex due to a previous wound infection (67%), one or more complicating comorbidities (87.1%), one or more complicating hernia characteristics (75.7%) or contaminated or dirty defects (37.1%). Concomitant component separation was performed in 43 of 70 patients (61.4%). Overall surgical site infection (SSI) rate in these CAWR patients was 45.7%. Seventeen of 70 patients (24.3%) had computed tomography (CT) - and culture-confirmed SSI in direct contact of mesh, suspicious of mesh infection. Mesh removal for persistent local infection occurred in 10% (7 of 70) after a median of 229 days since surgery. Salvage rate of mesh after direct contact with infection was 58.8%. All removed meshes were in the LTD group. Seven patients (10%) had a recurrence; four patients in the LTD group (10%) had a recurrence at a median follow-up of 35 months and three patients in the MTD group (10%) at a median follow-up of 11 months. Three of the seven recurrences occurred in patients with SSI in persistent and direct contact with mesh. CONCLUSIONS Comorbid patients undergoing open complex abdominal wall reconstruction are at high risk of postoperative wound complications regardless of which type of biosynthetic mesh is used. When in persistent and direct contact with infection, long-term biodegradable biosynthetic meshes may need to be removed, whereas mid-term biodegradable biosynthetic meshes can be salvaged.
Collapse
|
15
|
Ashmore D, Lee M. Parenteral nutrition in emergency surgery: A multicentre cross-sectional study. J Hum Nutr Diet 2021; 35:5-13. [PMID: 33829582 DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency general surgical patients are inherently at high risk of malnutrition. Early decision-making with implementation is fundamental to patient recovery. For many patients, parenteral nutrition (PN) is the only feeding option available. The present study assessed the timing and outcomes of this decision-making process. METHODS A sample of at least 10 consecutive adult patients admitted as a general surgical emergency to eight UK hospitals over 1 year who had received PN was identified. Patient demographics, basic descriptors and nutritional data were captured. Process measures regarding dates decisions were made or activities completed were extracted from records, as were outcome measures including PN complications. Six time frames examining the process of PN delivery were analysed. Associations between categorical and binary variables were investigated with a chi-squared test with significance determined as p < 0.05. RESULTS In total, 125 patients were included. Intestinal obstruction was the most common diagnosis with 59% of all patients deemed high risk on nutritional assessment at admission. Median time to decision for PN was 5 days following admission (n = 122, interquartile range = 7). Patients received PN for a mean of 11 days. Eighty-five percent of patients developed a complication, with a phosphate abnormality being the most commonly reported (54%). Only altered blood glucose levels appeared to correlate with a delay in starting PN (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The present study shows there are delays in the decision to use PN in the acutely ill surgical patient. Once initiated, the pathway is relatively short. There are high rates of electrolyte abnormalities in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ashmore
- Department of General Surgery, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
| | - Matthew Lee
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
de Vries FEE, Claessen JJM, van Hasselt-Gooijer EMS, van Ruler O, Jonkers C, Kuin W, van Arum I, van der Werf GM, Serlie MJ, Boermeester MA. Bridging-to-Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Intestinal Failure. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1545-1555. [PMID: 32700102 PMCID: PMC8203517 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04741-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
AIM Type 2 intestinal failure (IF) is characterized by the need for longer-term parenteral nutrition (PN). During this so-called bridging-to-surgery period, morbidity and mortality rates are high. This study aimed to evaluate to what extent a multidisciplinary IF team is capable to safely guide patients towards reconstructive surgery. METHODS A consecutive series of patients with type 2 IF followed up by a specialized IF team between January 1st, 2011, and March 1st, 2016, was analyzed. Data on their first outpatient clinic visit (T1) and their last visit before reconstructive surgery (T2) was collected. The primary outcome was a combined endpoint of a patient being able to recover at home, have (partial) oral intake, and a normal albumin level (> 35 g/L) before surgery. RESULTS Ninety-three patients were included. The median number of previous abdominal procedures was 4. At T2 (last visit prior to reconstructive surgery), significantly more patients met the combined primary endpoint compared with T1 (first IF team consultation) (66.7% vs. 28.0% (p < 0.0001), respectively); 86% had home PN. During "bridging-to-surgery," acute hospitalization rate was 40.9% and acute surgery was 4.3%. Postoperatively, 44.1% experienced a major complication, 5.4% had a fistula, and in-hospital mortality was 6.5%. Of the cohort, 86% regained enteral autonomy, and when excluding in-hospital mortality and incomplete follow-up, this was 94.1%. An albumin level < 35 g/L at T2 and weight loss of > 10% at T2 compared with preadmission weight were significant risk factors for major complications. CONCLUSION Bridging-to-surgery of type 2 IF patients under the guidance of an IF team resulted in the majority of patients being managed at home, having oral intake, and restored albumin levels prior to reconstructive surgery compared with their first IF consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fleur E. E. de Vries
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J. M. Claessen
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elina M. S. van Hasselt-Gooijer
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oddeke van Ruler
- grid.414559.80000 0004 0501 4532Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Cora Jonkers
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Nutrition Support Team, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wanda Kuin
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene van Arum
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. Miriam van der Werf
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Nutrition Support Team, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille J. Serlie
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marja A. Boermeester
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Long-term outcomes after contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia 2020; 24:459-468. [PMID: 32078080 PMCID: PMC7210226 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02124-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complex abdominal wall repair (CAWR) in a contaminated operative field is a challenge. Available literature regarding long-term outcomes of CAWR comprises studies that often have small numbers and heterogeneous patient populations. This study aims to assess long-term outcomes of modified-ventral hernia working group (VHWG) grade 3 repairs. Because the relevance of hernia recurrence (HR) as the primary outcome for this patient group is contentious, the need for further hernia surgery (FHS) was also assessed in relation to long-term survival. METHODS A retrospective cohort study with a single prospective follow-up time-point nested in a consecutive series of patients undergoing CAWR in two European national intestinal failure centers. RESULTS In long-term analysis, 266 modified VHWG grade 3 procedures were included. The overall HR rate was 32.3%. The HR rates for non-crosslinked biologic meshes and synthetic meshes when fascial closure was achieved were 20.3% and 30.6%, respectively. The rates of FHS were 7.2% and 16.7%, and occurred only within the first 3 years. Bridged repairs showed poorer results (fascial closure 22.9% hernia recurrence vs bridged 57.1% recurrence). Overall survival was relatively good with 80% en 70% of the patients still alive after 5 and 10 years, respectively. In total 86.6% of the patients remained free of FHS. CONCLUSIONS In this study of contaminated CAWR, non-crosslinked biologic mesh shows better results than synthetic mesh. Bridging repairs with no posterior and/or anterior fascial closure have a higher recurrence rate. The overall survival was good and the majority of patients remained free of additional hernia surgery.
Collapse
|
19
|
Hodgkinson JD, de Vries FEE, Claessen JJM, Leo CA, Maeda Y, van Ruler O, Lapid O, Obdeijn MC, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA, Constantinides J, Hanna GB, Warusavitarne J, Boermeester MA, Vaizey C. The development and validation of risk-stratification models for short-term outcomes following contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia 2020; 24:449-458. [PMID: 32040789 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02120-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Short-term outcomes for patients undergoing contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CCAWR), including risk stratification, have not been studied in sufficiently high numbers. This study aims to develop and validate risk-stratification models for Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 3 complications in patients undergoing CCAWR. METHODS A consecutive cohort of patients who underwent CCAWR in two European national intestinal failure centers, from January 2004 to December 2015, was identified. Data were collected retrospectively for short-term outcomes and used to develop risk models using logistic regression. A further cohort, from January 2016 to December 2017, was used to validate the models. RESULTS The development cohort consisted of 272 procedures performed in 254 patients. The validation cohort consisted of 114 patients. The cohorts were comparable in baseline demographics (mean age 58.0 vs 58.1; sex 58.8% male vs 54.4%, respectively). A multi-variate model including the presence of intestinal failure (p < 0.01) and operative time (p < 0.01) demonstrated good discrimination and calibration on validation. Models for wound and intra-abdominal complications were also developed, including pre-operative immunosuppression (p = 0.05), intestinal failure (p = 0.02), increasing operative time (p = 0.04), increasing number of anastomoses (p = 0.01) and the number of previous abdominal operations (p = 0.02). While these models showed reasonable ability to discriminate patients on internal assessment, they were not found to be accurate on external validation. CONCLUSION Acceptable short-term outcomes after CCAWR are demonstrated. A robust model for the prediction of CD ≥ grade 3 complications has been developed and validated. This model is available online at www.smbari.co.uk/smjconv2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Hodgkinson
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Academic Institute, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK. .,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - F E E de Vries
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J M Claessen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Leo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Academic Institute, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Y Maeda
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Academic Institute, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - O van Ruler
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/D IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - O Lapid
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M C Obdeijn
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Constantinides
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Academic Institute, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK
| | - G B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J Warusavitarne
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Academic Institute, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - M A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Vaizey
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Academic Institute, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pellino G, Keller DS, Sampietro GM, Annese V, Carvello M, Celentano V, Coco C, Colombo F, Cracco N, Di Candido F, Franceschi M, Laureti S, Mattioli G, Pio L, Sciaudone G, Sica G, Villanacci V, Zinicola R, Leone S, Danese S, Spinelli A, Delaini G, Selvaggi F. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): general principles of IBD management. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:105-126. [PMID: 31983044 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02145-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a Position Statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of inflammatory bowel disease management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the general principles of surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | - D S Keller
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | | | - V Annese
- Gastroenterology Unit, DEA-Medicina E Chirurgia Generale E D'Urgenza, University Hospital Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - M Carvello
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - V Celentano
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
- University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - C Coco
- UOC Chirurgia Generale 2, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Colombo
- L. Sacco University Hospital Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - N Cracco
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - F Di Candido
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Franceschi
- IBD Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - S Laureti
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - G Mattioli
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, and Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - L Pio
- Pediatric Surgery Department, Hôpital Robert-Debré and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - G Sciaudone
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - G Sica
- Minimally Invasive and Gastro-Intestinal Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - V Villanacci
- Institute of Pathology, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - R Zinicola
- Department of Emergency Surgery, University Hospital Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - S Leone
- CEO, Associazione Nazionale Per Le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Dell'Intestino "A.M.I.C.I. Onlus", Milan, Italy
| | - S Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - A Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Delaini
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - F Selvaggi
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hodgkinson JD, Oke SM, Warusavitarne J, Hanna GB, Gabe SM, Vaizey CJ. Incisional hernia and enterocutaneous fistula in patients with chronic intestinal failure: prevalence and risk factors in a cohort of patients referred to a tertiary centre. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:1288-1295. [PMID: 31218774 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aims to determine the prevalence of incisional hernia (IH) and enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) in patients with intestinal failure (IF) referred to a tertiary centre and to identify factors associated with their development. METHOD A retrospective case note review was undertaken of a prospectively maintained database of all patients on home parenteral nutrition between 2011 and 2016 at a UK tertiary referral centre for IF. Risk factors were identified using binary logistic regression. RESULTS The database search identified 447 patients, of whom 349 (78.1%) had surgery prior to developing IF. Eighty-one (23.2%) patients had an IH and 123 (35.2%) had an ECF at the time of referral. Of these, 51 (14.6%) had both IH and ECF. IH was associated with a high body mass index (P = 0.05), a history of a major surgical complication resulting in IF (P = 0.01), previous emergency surgery (P = 0.04), increasing number of operations (P = 0.02) and surgical site infection (SSI; P = 0.01). ECF was associated with complications relating to earlier surgery. (P ≤ .001), previous treatment with an open abdomen (P = 0.03), SSI (P = 0.001), intra-abdominal collection (P ≤ 0.001) and anastomotic leak (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION In this series, patients with IF had a prevalence of IH which was more than double that expected following elective laparotomy (about 10%) and one in three had an ECF. Risk factors for IH and ECF are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Hodgkinson
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - S M Oke
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - J Warusavitarne
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - G B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - S M Gabe
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - C J Vaizey
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Witte MB. Reconstructive Surgery for Intestinal Failure. Visc Med 2019; 35:312-319. [PMID: 31768395 PMCID: PMC6873023 DOI: 10.1159/000503042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal failure (IF) in the adult is the result of a wide spectrum of disease. Acute mesenteric ischemia, postoperative short bowel due to a complicative course, and Crohn's disease are major causes of IF. Reconstructive surgery in the context of IF comprises a spectrum of procedures including stoma takedown, reversal of laparostomies, and closure of enteric fistulas. METHODS This article is based on a PubMed-based literature search and personal experience in adult patients with IF. RESULTS This review summarizes therapeutic options of reconstructive surgery in adult patients focusing on the main reasons of IF such as mesenteric ischemia, complicative previous surgery, and Crohn's disease. Indications and contraindications are discussed as well as the optimal time point of reconstructive surgery. CONCLUSION This overview summarizes surgical aspects in a special cohort of patients with a rare disease entity necessitating an interdisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria B. Witte
- *Maria B. Witte, Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Rostock, Schillingallee 35, DE–18507 Rostock (Germany), E-Mail
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lee MJ, Sayers AE, Drake TM, Singh P, Bradburn M, Wilson TR, Murugananthan A, Walsh CJ, Fearnhead NS. Malnutrition, nutritional interventions and clinical outcomes of patients with acute small bowel obstruction: results from a national, multicentre, prospective audit. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029235. [PMID: 31352419 PMCID: PMC6661661 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the nutritional status of patients presenting with small bowel obstruction (SBO), along with associated nutritional interventions and clinical outcomes. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING 131 UK hospitals with acute surgical services. PARTICIPANTS 2069 adult patients with a diagnosis of SBO were included in this study. The mean age was 67.0 years and 54.7% were female. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes recorded included: major complications (composite of in-hospital mortality, reoperation, unplanned intensive care admission and 30-day readmission), complications arising from surgery (anastomotic leak, wound dehiscence), infection (pneumonia, surgical site infection, intra-abdominal infection, urinary tract infection, venous catheter infection), cardiac complications, venous thromboembolism and delirium. RESULTS Postoperative adhesions were the most common cause of SBO (49.1%). Early surgery (<24 hours postadmission) took place in 30.0% of patients, 22.0% underwent delayed operation and 47.9% were managed non-operatively. Malnutrition as stratified by Nutritional Risk Index was common, with 35.7% at moderate risk and 5.7% at severe risk of malnutrition. Dietitian review occurred in just 36.4% and 55.9% of the moderate and severe risk groups. In the low risk group, 30.3% received nutritional intervention compared with 40.7% in moderate risk group and 62.7% in severe risk group. In comparison to the low risk group, patients who were at severe or moderate risk of malnutrition had 4.2 and 2.4 times higher unadjusted risk of in-hospital mortality, respectively. Propensity-matched analysis found no difference in outcomes based on use or timing of parenteral nutrition. CONCLUSIONS Malnutrition on admission is associated with worse outcomes in patients with SBO, and marked variation in management of malnutrition was observed. Future trials should focus on identifying effective and cost-effective nutritional interventions in SBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew James Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Adele E Sayers
- General Surgery, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | - Thomas M Drake
- Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Pritam Singh
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Timothy R Wilson
- General Surgery, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | | | - Ciaran J Walsh
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | - Nicola S Fearnhead
- Colorectal Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lee MJ, Sayers AE, Drake TM, Marriott PJ, Anderson ID, Bach SP, Bradburn M, Hind D, Verjee A, Fearnhead NS. National prospective cohort study of the burden of acute small bowel obstruction. BJS Open 2019; 3:354-366. [PMID: 31183452 PMCID: PMC6551410 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Small bowel obstruction is a common surgical emergency, and is associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality across the world. The literature provides little information on the conservatively managed group. The aim of this study was to describe the burden of small bowel obstruction in the UK. Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted in 131 acute hospitals in the UK between January and April 2017, delivered by trainee research collaboratives. Adult patients with a diagnosis of mechanical small bowel obstruction were included. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included complications, unplanned intensive care admission and readmission within 30 days of discharge. Practice measures, including use of radiological investigations, water soluble contrast, operative and nutritional interventions, were collected. Results Of 2341 patients identified, 693 (29·6 per cent) underwent immediate surgery (within 24 h of admission), 500 (21·4 per cent) had delayed surgery after initial conservative management, and 1148 (49·0 per cent) were managed non‐operatively. The mortality rate was 6·6 per cent (6·4 per cent for non‐operative management, 6·8 per cent for immediate surgery, 6·8 per cent for delayed surgery; P = 0·911). The major complication rate was 14·4 per cent overall, affecting 19·0 per cent in the immediate surgery, 23·6 per cent in the delayed surgery and 7·7 per cent in the non‐operative management groups (P < 0·001). Cox regression found hernia or malignant aetiology and malnutrition to be associated with higher rates of death. Malignant aetiology, operative intervention, acute kidney injury and malnutrition were associated with increased risk of major complication. Conclusion Small bowel obstruction represents a significant healthcare burden. Patient‐level factors such as timing of surgery, acute kidney injury and nutritional status are factors that might be modified to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Lee
- Department of General Surgery Northern General Hospital Sheffield UK.,South Yorkshire Surgical Research Group Sheffield UK
| | - A E Sayers
- South Yorkshire Surgical Research Group Sheffield UK.,Department of General Surgery Doncaster Royal Infirmary Doncaster UK
| | - T M Drake
- South Yorkshire Surgical Research Group Sheffield UK.,Department of Clinical Surgery University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| | - P J Marriott
- Department of General Surgery Warwick Hospital Warwick UK.,Department of General Surgery Salford Royal Infirmary Salford UK
| | - I D Anderson
- West Midlands Research Collaborative, Academic Department of Surgery Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham UK
| | - S P Bach
- Academic Department of Surgery Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham UK
| | - M Bradburn
- Clinical Trials and Research Unit University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
| | - D Hind
- Clinical Trials and Research Unit University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
| | - A Verjee
- Patient Representative, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Patient Liaison Group London UK
| | - N S Fearnhead
- Department of Surgery Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Smith J, Godfrey E, Bowden D, Hickman K, Sharkey L, Butler A, Upponi S. Imaging of adult intestinal failure. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:603-612. [PMID: 30654907 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal failure is the inability to maintain adequate nutrition or hydration through the gut. It is caused by a diverse range of benign and malignant aetiologies. Imaging takes a central role in the multidisciplinary assessment of patients with intestinal failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Smith
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - E Godfrey
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - D Bowden
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - K Hickman
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - L Sharkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - A Butler
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - S Upponi
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Brown SR, Fearnhead NS, Faiz OD, Abercrombie JF, Acheson AG, Arnott RG, Clark SK, Clifford S, Davies RJ, Davies MM, Douie WJP, Dunlop MG, Epstein JC, Evans MD, George BD, Guy RJ, Hargest R, Hawthorne AB, Hill J, Hughes GW, Limdi JK, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, O'Connell PR, Pinkney TD, Pipe J, Sagar PM, Singh B, Soop M, Terry H, Torkington J, Verjee A, Walsh CJ, Warusavitarne JH, Williams AB, Williams GL, Wilson RG. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 Suppl 8:3-117. [PMID: 30508274 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology. METHODS Surgeons who are members of the ACPGBI with a recognised interest in IBD were invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines. RESULTS All aspects of surgical care for IBD have been included along with 157 recommendations for management. CONCLUSION These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of IBD and will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Brown
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - N S Fearnhead
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - O D Faiz
- St Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, Harrow, UK
| | | | - A G Acheson
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - R G Arnott
- Patient Liaison Group, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - S K Clark
- St Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, Harrow, UK
| | | | - R J Davies
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - M M Davies
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - W J P Douie
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - J C Epstein
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - M D Evans
- Morriston Hospital, Morriston, Swansea, UK
| | - B D George
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R J Guy
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Hargest
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - J Hill
- Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - G W Hughes
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - J K Limdi
- The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - T D Pinkney
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Pipe
- Patient Liaison Group, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - P M Sagar
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - B Singh
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - M Soop
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - H Terry
- Crohn's and Colitis UK, St Albans, UK
| | | | - A Verjee
- Patient Liaison Group, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - C J Walsh
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, UK
| | | | - A B Williams
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
What is the evidence for the use of parenteral nutrition (PN) in critically ill surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22:755-766. [PMID: 30430312 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1875-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malnutrition is associated with poor outcomes in surgical patients and corrective enteral feeding may not be possible. This is a particular problem in the acute setting where malnutrition is prevalent. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the use of parenteral nutrition (PN) in critically ill surgical patients. METHODS This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017079567). Searches of the CENTRAL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases were performed using a predefined strategy. Randomised trials published in English since 1995, reporting a comparison of PN vs any comparator in a critically ill surgical population were included. The primary outcome was mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to assess variation in mortality and length of stay. RESULTS Fourteen RCTs were identified; standard PN was compared vs other forms of PN in ten studies, to PN with variable dose amino acids in one, and to enteral nutrition (EN) in three. In trials comparing glutamine-supplemented PN (PN-GLN) to PN, a non-significant reduction in mortality was noted (risk difference - 0.08. 95% CI - 0.17, 0.01, p = 0.08). A trend for a reduction in length of stay was seen in PN-GLN to PN comparator (mean reduction - 2.4, 95% CI - 7.19 to 2.32 days, I2 = 92%). Impact on other outcome measures varied in direction of effect. CONCLUSIONS PN may offer benefit in critically ill surgical patients. The size and quality of studies lead to uncertainty around the estimates of clinical effect, meaning a robust trial is required.
Collapse
|
28
|
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Timing and Outcome of Intestinal Failure Surgery in Patients with Enteric Fistula. World J Surg 2018; 42:695-706. [PMID: 28924879 PMCID: PMC5801381 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4224-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background The timing of intestinal failure (IF) surgery has changed. Most specialized centers now recommend postponing reconstructive surgery for enteric fistula and emphasize that abdominal sepsis has to be resolved and the patient’s condition improved. Our aim was to study the outcome of postponed surgery, to identify risk factors for recurrence and mortality, and to define more precisely the optimal timing of reconstructive surgery. Methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed on the outcomes of reconstructive IF surgery (fistula recurrence, mortality, morbidity, hernia recurrence, total closure, enteral autonomy). If appropriate, meta-analyses were performed. Optimal timing was explored, and risk factors for recurrence and mortality were identified. Results Fifteen studies were included. The weighted pooled fistula recurrence rate was 19% (95% CI 15–24). Lower recurrence rates were found in studies with a longer median time and/or, at the minimum of the range, a longer time interval to surgery. Overall mortality was 3% (95% CI 2–5). Total fistula closure rates ranged from 80 to 97%. Enteral autonomy after reconstructive surgery, mentioned in four studies, varied between 79 and 100%. Conclusions Postponed IF surgery for enteric fistula is associated with lower recurrence. Due to the wide range of time to definitive surgery within each study, optimal timing of surgery could not be defined from published data.
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee MJ, Sayers AE, Wilson TR, Acheson AG, Anderson ID, Fearnhead NS. Current management of small bowel obstruction in the UK: results from the National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction clinical practice survey. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:623-630. [PMID: 29331086 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/30/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction (NASBO) is a collaboration between trainees and specialty associations to improve the care of patients with SBO through national clinical audit. The aim of this study was to define current consultant practice preferences in the management of SBO in the UK. METHOD A survey was designed to assess practice preferences of consultant surgeons. The anonymous survey captured demographics, indications for surgery or conservative management, use of investigations including water-soluble contrast agents (WSCA), use of laparoscopy and nutritional support strategies. The questionnaire underwent two pilot rounds prior to dissemination via the NASBO network. RESULTS A total of 384 responses were received from 131 NASBO participating units (overall response rate 29.2%). Abdominal CT and serum urea and electrolytes were considered essential initial investigations by more than 80% of consultants. Consensus was demonstrated on indications for early surgery and conservative management. Three hundred and thirty-eight (88%) respondents would consider use of WSCA; of these, 328 (97.1%) would use it in adhesive SBO. Two hundred (52.1%) consultants considered a laparoscopic approach when operating for SBO. Oral nutritional supplements were favoured in operatively managed patients by 259 (67.4%) respondents compared with conservatively managed patients (186 respondents, 48.4%). CONCLUSION This survey demonstrates consensus on imaging requirements and indications for early surgery in the management of SBO. Significant variation exists around awareness of the need for nutritional support in patients with SBO, and on strategies to achieve this support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Lee
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,South Yorkshire Surgical Research Group, Sheffield, UK
| | - A E Sayers
- South Yorkshire Surgical Research Group, Sheffield, UK.,Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - T R Wilson
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - A G Acheson
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - N S Fearnhead
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Grainger JT, Maeda Y, Donnelly SC, Vaizey CJ. Assessment and management of patients with intestinal failure: a multidisciplinary approach. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2018; 11:233-241. [PMID: 29928141 PMCID: PMC6003282 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s122868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Intestinal failure (IF) is a condition characterized by the inability to maintain a state of adequate nutrition, or fluid and electrolyte balance due to an anatomical or a physiological disorder of the gastrointestinal system. IF can be an extremely debilitating condition, significantly affecting the quality of life of those affected. The surgical management of patients with acute and chronic IF requires a specialist team who has the expertise in terms of technical challenges and decision-making. A dedicated IF unit will have the expertise in patient selection for surgery, investigative workup and planning, operative risk assessment with relevant anesthetic expertise, and a multidisciplinary team with support such as nutritional expertise and interventional radiology. This article covers the details of IF management, including the classification of IF, etiology, prevention of IF, and initial management of IF, focusing on sepsis treatment and nutritional support. It also covers the surgical aspects of IF such as intestinal reconstruction, abdominal wall reconstruction, and intestinal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie T Grainger
- The Lennard Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Yasuko Maeda
- The Lennard Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Suzanne C Donnelly
- The Lennard Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Carolynne J Vaizey
- The Lennard Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize the recent evidence on the treatment of abdominal sepsis with a specific emphasis on the surgical treatment. RECENT FINDINGS A multitude of surgical approaches towards abdominal sepsis are practised. Recent evidence shows that immediate closure of the abdomen has a better outcome. A short course of antibiotics has a similar effect as a long course of antibiotics in patients with intra-abdominal infection without severe sepsis. SUMMARY Management of abdominal sepsis requires a multidisciplinary approach. Closing the abdomen permanently after source control and only reopening it in case of deterioration of the patient without other (percutaneous) options is the preferred strategy. There is no convincing evidence that damage control surgery is beneficial in patients with abdominal sepsis. If primary closure of the abdomen is impossible because of excessive visceral edema, delayed closure using negative pressure therapy with continuous mesh-mediated fascial traction shows the best results.
Collapse
|
32
|
Lauro A, Cirocchi R, Cautero N, Dazzi A, Pironi D, Di Matteo FM, Santoro A, Faenza S, Pironi L, Pinna AD. Surgery for post-operative entero-cutaneous fistulas: is bowel resection plus primary anastomosis without stoma a safe option to avoid early recurrence? Report on 20 cases by a single center and systematic review of the literature. G Chir 2017; 38:185-198. [PMID: 29182901 DOI: 10.11138/gchir/2017.38.4.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A review was performed on entero-cutaneous fistula (ECF) repair and early recurrence, adding our twenty adult patients (65% had multiple fistulas). METHODS The search yielded 4.098 articles but only 15 were relevant: 1.217 patients underwent surgery. The interval time between fistula's diagnosis and operative repair was between 3 months and 1 year. A bowel resection with primary anastomosis was performed in 1.048 patients, 192 (18.3%) underwent a covering stoma: 856 patients (81.7%) had a fistula takedown in one procedure. RESULTS The patients had 14.3% recurrence and 13.1% mortality rate. In our experience 75% were surgically treated after a period equal or above one year from fistula occurrence: surgery was very demolitive (in 40% remnant small bowel was less than 100 cm). We performed a bowel resection with a hand-sewn anastomosis (95%) without temporary stoma. In-hospital mortality was 0% and at discharge all were back to oral intake with 0% early re-fistulisation. CONCLUSIONS Literature supports our experience: ECF takedown could be safely performed after an adequate period of recovery from 3 months to one year from fistula occurrence. In our series primary repair (bowel resection plus reconnection surgery without temporary stoma) avoided an early recurrence without mortality.
Collapse
|
33
|
Hodgkinson JD, Maeda Y, Leo CA, Warusavitarne J, Vaizey CJ. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of active infection and contamination: a systematic review of hernia and fistula recurrence rates. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:319-330. [PMID: 28102927 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Minimal evidence exists to guide surgeons on the risk of complications when performing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in the presence of active infection, contamination or enterocutaneous fistula. This study aims to establish the outcomes of contaminated complex AWR. METHOD Analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Pubmed databases was performed. Studies reporting exclusively on single-staged repair of contaminated complex AWR were included. Pooled data were analysed to establish rates of complications. RESULTS Sixteen studies were included, consisting of 601 contaminated complex AWRs, of which 233 included concurrent enterocutaneous fistula repair. The average follow-up period was 26.7 months. There were 146 (24.3%) reported hernia recurrences. When stratified by repair method, suture repair alone had the lowest rate of recurrence (14.2%), followed by nonabsorbable synthetic mesh reinforcement (21.2%), biological mesh (25.8%) and absorbable synthetic mesh (53.1%). Hernia recurrence was higher when fascial closure was not achieved. Of the 233 enterocutaneous fistula repairs, fistula recurrence was seen in 24 patients (10.3%). Suture repair alone had the lowest rate of recurrence (1.6%), followed by nonbiological mesh (10.3%) and biological mesh reinforcement (12%). Forty-six per cent of patients were reported as having a wound-related complication and the mortality rate was 2.5%. CONCLUSION It is feasible to perform simultaneous enterocutaneous fistula repair and AWR as rates of recurrent fistula are comparable with series describing enterocutaneous fistula repair alone. Hernias recurred in nearly a quarter of cases. This analysis is limited by a lack of comparative data and variability of outcome reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Y Maeda
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - C A Leo
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | | | - C J Vaizey
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Parés D. Medical and surgical management of patients with enterocutaneous fistula and intestinal failure: The case for specialised functional units. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2016; 40:122-123. [PMID: 27242159 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2016.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David Parés
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth NHS Trust, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, Reino Unido.
| |
Collapse
|