1
|
Alvarado J, Besser N, Mohan H, Heriot A, Warrier S, Larach JT. Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for transverse colon cancer: intraoperative quality landmarks following resection. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:757-758. [PMID: 38149756 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Alvarado
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicolás Besser
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Helen Mohan
- Colorectal Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - José Tomás Larach
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Lange G, Davies J, Toso C, Meurette G, Ris F, Meyer J. Complete mesocolic excision for right hemicolectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:979-993. [PMID: 37632643 PMCID: PMC10562294 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02853-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complete mesocolic excision improves lymphadenectomy for right hemicolectomy and respects the embryological planes. However, its effect on cancer-free and overall survival is questioned. Therefore, we aimed to determine the potential benefits of the technique by performing a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the available evidence. METHODS Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, and Embase were searched on February 22, 2023. Original studies on short- and long-term oncological outcomes of adult patients undergoing right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision as a treatment for primary colon cancer were considered for inclusion. Outcomes were extracted and pooled using a model with random effects. RESULTS A total of 586 publications were identified through database searching, and 18 from citation searching. Exclusion of 552 articles left 24 articles for inclusion. Meta-analysis showed that complete mesocolic excision increased the lymph node harvest (5 studies, 1479 patients, MD 9.62, 95% CI 5.83-13.41, p > 0.0001, I2 84%), 5-year overall survival (5 studies, 2381 patients, OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.14-3.09, p = 0.01, I2 66%), 5-year disease-free survival (4 studies, 1376 patients, OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.51-3.23, p < 0.0001, I2 0%) and decreased the incidence of local recurrence (4 studies, 818 patients, OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.79, p = 0.02, I2 0%) when compared to standard right hemicolectomy. Perioperative morbidity was similar between the techniques (8 studies, 3899 patients, OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.22, p = 0.97, I2 0%). CONCLUSION Meta-analysis of observational and randomised studies showed that right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision for primary right colon cancer improves oncologic results without increasing morbidity/mortality. These results need to be confirmed by high-quality evidence and randomised trials in selected patients to assess who may benefit from the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G De Lange
- Medical School, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - C Toso
- Medical School, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - G Meurette
- Medical School, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - F Ris
- Medical School, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - J Meyer
- Medical School, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sica GS, Vinci D, Siragusa L, Sensi B, Guida AM, Bellato V, García-Granero Á, Pellino G. Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:846-861. [PMID: 36097099 PMCID: PMC9944740 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09548-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation. METHODS PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques. RESULTS Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique. CONCLUSIONS The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe S Sica
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. .,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Danilo Vinci
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea M Guida
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Bellato
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Ospedale IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Álvaro García-Granero
- Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma, Spain.,Applied Surgical Anatomy Unit, Human Embryology and Anatomy Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Human Embryology and Anatomy Department, University of Islas Baleares, Palma, Spain
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.,Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maertens V, Stefan S, Mykoniatis I, Siddiqi N, David G, Khan JS. Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:155-161. [PMID: 35428945 PMCID: PMC9939489 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01398-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right-sided colon cancers appears to confer oncological benefits compared to conventional colectomy. Identification of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) remains challenging. We describe the novel use of intra-operative robotic ultrasound scan (rUSS) in obese patients (BMI ≥ 29). All consecutive patients having robotic CME for colon cancer between 2014 and 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded on an ethics approved prospective database and included patient demographics, clinical and oncological outcomes. Patients were divided into group 1 (BMI ≤ 28) and group 2 (BMI ≥ 29). SMV first approach was employed in all cases and SMV detection was aided using rUSS in group 2. Primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, operative time and length of stay (LOS). 41 (group 1, median 66 years) were compared to 32 patients (group 2, median 63 years). There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Median operative times for group 2 were 30 min longer (186 vs. 216 min, p = 0.05). Overall morbidity was similar (20% vs. 19% in group 1 and 2, p = 0.26). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to LOS (median 7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.48), readmissions (2 vs. 5, p = 0.13), R0 resection rate (98% vs. 94%, p = 0.43) and lymph node harvest (median 31 vs. 30, p = 0.28).CME can be technically more challenging than conventional colectomy in obese patients and is associated with longer operative times. The use of rUSS in obese patients can help to identify SMV and allow safer dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Maertens
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Samuel Stefan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Ioannis Mykoniatis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Najaf Siddiqi
- University Hospital Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, Dorset, UK
| | - Gerald David
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Jim S Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
- Faculty of Sciences, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hodges N, Mackenzie H, D'Souza N, Brown G, Miskovic D. Survival outcomes for right-versus left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer in England: A propensity-score matched population-based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:841-849. [PMID: 34688513 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients operated on for potentially curable right versus left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer in England. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective propensity-score matched population-based cohort study was performed using data from English Hospital Episode Statistics, Office for National Statistics and National Bowel Cancer Audit dataset. Patients ≥18 who underwent elective resection for right-colon, left-colon, or rectal cancer between 2000 and 2015 were included. Patients were matched using propensity scores with the dependant variable being site of primary tumour (right-colon, left-colon, or rectum) and independent variables age, Charlson comorbidity index, operation year and Duke's stage. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 167,606 patients were included. Following propensity-score matching 26,662 patients remained in each group (right-colon, left-colon, and rectum). 5-year OS was significantly worse for patients with Duke's A-C right-sided primaries compared to left-sided and rectal cancers in the unmatched (58.8% vs 66.7% vs 70.0% p=<0.001) and matched cohorts (62.6%, 66.8%, 65.8% p=<0.001). Superior OS for patients with left-sided colon cancer was demonstrated across all stages (Duke's A HR 0.845, p = 0.003; Duke's B HR 0.947, p = 0.045; Duke's C HR 0.783, p < 0.0001). Secondary analysis demonstrated equivalent OS between study groups when ≥22 lymph nodes were harvested. CONCLUSION There is a significant difference in survival between comparable patients with right and left sided colon cancers in England. The quality and/or extent of mesenteric resection may be of particular importance in right-sided colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Hodges
- St Mark's Hospital, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK; Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Hugh Mackenzie
- Imperial College, London, UK; Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Gina Brown
- Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK; Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Danilo Miskovic
- St Mark's Hospital, London, UK; Imperial College, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Testa DC, Mazzola L, di Martino G, Cotellese R, Selvaggi F. Laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right colonic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective comparative study. ANZ J Surg 2021; 92:132-139. [PMID: 34636465 PMCID: PMC9293306 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine the outcome of patients treated with complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) after conventional and laparoscopic surgery. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated stage I-IV colon adenocarcinoma patients treated by the same surgeon (L.M.) from 2013 to 2018. Postoperative complications, recurrences and survival are assessed. RESULTS Fifty-one patients (M/F: 24/27) underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME (L-CME) or open CME (O-CME) plus CVL. Tumour location was the caecum in 39.2% of cases, the transverse in 23.5%, the hepatic colonic flexure in 21.5%, and the ascending colon in 15.6%. Twenty-four patients underwent L-CME while 27 underwent O-CME. More than 15 harvested lymphnodes are reported in 74.1% of O-CME patients and in 66.7% of L-CME patients (p = 0.562). Postoperative complications occurred in 7 O-CME and 5 L-CME patients, respectively (p = 0.669). Three-year overall survival, including stage IV, was of 75% versus 77.8% for L-CME and O-CME patients, respectively, while for stage I-III, was of 88.9% vs. 80% in L-CME and O-CME, respectively (p = 0.440). The median follow-up was of 2.43 years. CONCLUSION CME with CVL is a meticulous, complex but feasible technique. In our experience, oncological results in terms of recurrences and overall survival, after conventional and laparoscopic CME plus CVL, are comparable. Patients with stage I-III colon adenocarcinoma have a better prognostic trend especially when more than 15 lymphnodes are removed. The respect of oncological radicality and the correct indication to minimally invasive surgery are the undiscussed key outcome variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenica Carmen Testa
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Mazzola
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.,Unit of General Surgery, "Renzetti" Hospital, Lanciano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe di Martino
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Roberto Cotellese
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.,Fondazione Villa Serena per la Ricerca, Pescara, Italy
| | - Federico Selvaggi
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.,Unit of General Surgery, "Renzetti" Hospital, Lanciano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Right-side colectomy with complete mesocolic excision vs conventional right-side colectomy in the treatment of colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1885-1904. [PMID: 33983451 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03951-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis aims to investigate the role of complete mesocolic excision (CME) in the treatment of right-side colon cancer when compared with standard right-side hemicolectomy, focusing on oncological outcomes, mortality and morbidity rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE archives, including studies on CME in right-side colon cancer. Primary outcomes were five-year disease-free survival and five-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes investigated were mortality and morbidity rates, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic leakage, postoperative ileus, day of postoperative flatus, pulmonary infection, duration of hospital stay and number of lymph nodes harvested. RESULTS Seventeen studies have been included in this meta-analysis for a total of 3918 patients. The five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) results improved in the CME group with respect to conventional right-side colectomy with an OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.02-3.45) and OR 2.77 (95% CI 1.33-5.74), respectively. The incidence of mortality and morbidity was comparable between the two groups. Moreover, conventional surgery time was faster than CME (MD 33.69 min, 95% CI 12.79-54.59), while no significant differences were reported in mean blood loss and hospital stay. Furthermore, the CME group showed a higher mean number of harvested lymph nodes (MD 7.08 lymph nodes 95% CI 4.90-9.27). CONCLUSION Complete mesocolic excision of the right-side colectomy improves oncological outcomes without increasing mortality and morbidity rates compared to standard right-side hemicolectomy. CME should therefore be routinely performed in the treatment of right-side colon cancer.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bernhoff R, Sjövall A, Granath F, Holm T, Martling A, Buchli C. Oncological outcomes after complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer: a population-based study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1404-1413. [PMID: 33624416 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed as the preferred surgical technique for resection of colon cancer. This prospective cohort study evaluates the effect of CME surgery on colon cancer mortality after right-sided hemicolectomy on a population level. METHODS Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and the Cause of Death Registry on all patients treated with elective right-sided hemicolectomy for colon cancer Stages I-III in the Stockholm County 2008-2012 were analysed. Adherence to principles of CME surgery was determined by structured analysis of anonymized surgical reports regarding the presence of five essential features. The exposure to CME was graded as group 0 (not exposed to CME), group 1 (intermediate) and group 2 (exposed to CME). RESULTS In total, 1171 patients were analysed with 234 (20.0%) patients in CME group 0, 453 (38.7%) patients in CME group 1 and 484 (41.3%) in CME group 2. The 5-year colon cancer mortality was 20.2% in CME group 0, 13.9% in CME group 1 and 13.1% in CME group 2 (P = 0.026). The adjusted hazard ratio for colon cancer mortality was 0.61 (95% CI 0.42-0.91; P = 0.014) for CME group 1 and 0.52 (95% CI 0.35-0.77; P = 0.001) for CME group 2. DISCUSSION The presence of predefined CME features in surgical reports was related to a graded benefit on cancer-specific mortality after right-sided hemicolectomy for colon cancer Stages I-III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Bernhoff
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annika Sjövall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Coloproctology, A5:01, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Granath
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Holm
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Coloproctology, A5:01, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christian Buchli
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Coloproctology, A5:01, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
D3-lymphadenectomy enhances oncological clearance in patients with right colon cancer. Results of a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1541-1551. [PMID: 33676793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND D3-Lymphadenectomy, together with complete mesocolic excision (CME), were introduced to provide oncological results after right colon cancer. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to assess the short and long-term outcomes of right-sided hemicolectomy with CME + D3 as compared with classic right hemicolectomy. Secondary aims included the prevalence of D3-metastasis and skip metastasis when performing CME + D3. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, according to PRISMA methodology. RESULTS 29 studies were enrolled (2592 patients). No differences were accounted in morbidity variables associated with the measured techniques. CME + D3 was significantly associated with a greater distance between the tumour and the closest vascular tie, a longer colonic resection, a wider resection of mesentery and an increased number of harvested lymph nodes. Regarding to long-terms outcomes, we found a significant decrease in local recurrence in patients undergoing CME + D3 (HR:0.17) and a significant improvement in 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates (HR:0.53 vs. HR:0.57, respectively), as well as an improving survival in patients with stage II and III disease. Overall prevalence of patients with lymphatic metastases in D3-territory was of 8.6% and 2.2% of skip metastases. CONCLUSIONS CME + D3 is a feasible surgical procedure that allows to obtain specimens with higher quality oncological resection, without greater associated morbidity, thus improving survival in patients with stage II and III right colon cancer.
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu L, Su X, He Z, Zhang C, Lu J, Zhang G, Sun Y, Du X, Chi P, Wang Z, Zhong M, Wu A, Zhu A, Li F, Xu J, Kang L, Suo J, Deng H, Ye Y, Ding K, Xu T, Zhang Z, Zheng M, Xiao Y. Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:391-401. [PMID: 33587893 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30685-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether extended lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer leads to increased perioperative complications or improves survival is still controversial. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of complete mesocolic excision (CME) versus D2 dissection in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for patients with right colon cancer. This article reports the early safety results from the trial. METHODS This randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority, trial was done at 17 hospitals in nine provinces of China. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma located between the caecum and the right third of the transverse colon, without evidence of distant metastases. Central randomisation was done by means of the Clinical Information Management-Central Randomisation System via block randomisation (block size of four). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to CME or D2 dissection during laparoscopic right colectomy. Central lymph nodes were dissected in the CME but not in the D2 procedure. Neither investigators nor patients were masked to their group assignment but the quality control committee were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival, but the data for this endpoint are not yet mature; thus, only the secondary outcomes-intraoperative surgical complications and postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality (death from any cause within 30 days of surgery), and central lymph node metastasis rate in the CME group only-are reported in this Article. This early analysis of safety was preplanned. The outcomes were analysed according to a modified intention-to-treat principle (excluding patients who no longer met inclusion criteria after surgery or who did not have surgery). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02619942. Study recruitment is complete, and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS Between Jan 11, 2016, and Dec 26, 2019, 1072 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. After exclusion of 77 patients, 995 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (495 in the CME group and 500 in the D2 dissection group). The postoperative surgical complication rate was 20% (97 of 495 patients) in the CME group versus 22% (109 of 500 patients) in the D2 group (difference, -2·2% [95% CI -7·2 to 2·8]; p=0·39); the frequency of Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications were similar between groups (91 [18%] vs 92 [18%], difference, -0·0% [95% CI -4·8 to 4·8]; p=1·0) but Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications were significantly less frequent in the CME group than in the D2 group (six [1%] vs 17 [3%], -2·2% [-4·1 to -0·3]; p=0·022); no deaths occurred in either group. Of the intraoperative complications, vascular injury was significantly more common in the CME group than in the D2 group (15 [3%] vs six [1%], difference, 1·8 [95% CI 0·04 to 3·6]; p=0·045). Metastases in the central lymph nodes were detected in 13 (3%) of 394 patients who underwent central lymph node biopsy in the CME group; no patient had isolated metastases to central lymph nodes. INTERPRETATION Although the CME procedure might increase the risk of intraoperative vascular injury, it generally seems to be safe and feasible for experienced surgeons. FUNDING The Capital Characteristic Clinical Project of Beijing and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lai Xu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing, China
| | - Xiangqian Su
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zirui He
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenghai Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Junyang Lu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing, China
| | - Guannan Zhang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing, China
| | - Yueming Sun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaohui Du
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ming Zhong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Aiwen Wu
- Department of Unit III & Ostomy Service, Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Anlong Zhu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Fei Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianmin Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Liang Kang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian Suo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Haijun Deng
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingjiang Ye
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kefeng Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention (Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing, China; School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Centre for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Minhua Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Xiao
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ho MLL, Ke TW, Chen WTL. Minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation (CME/CVL) for right colon cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:491-499. [PMID: 32655927 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.11.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard of care in rectal cancer surgery. Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation (CME and CVL) are surgical concepts that are extrapolated from the principles of TME. Increasingly adopted by surgical units worldwide, laparoscopic CME/CVL for right sided colon cancer is a challenging procedure that requires meticulous dissection by the surgeon and detailed knowledge of the colonic vascular anatomy. This review article addresses the main issues pertaining to this surgical technique and also discusses steps on how to perform this operation safely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Li Leonard Ho
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.,Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tao-Wei Ke
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung
| | - William Tzu-Liang Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.,Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Zhubei City
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ng KS, West NP, Scott N, Holzgang M, Quirke P, Jayne DG. What factors determine specimen quality in colon cancer surgery? A cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:869-880. [PMID: 32112199 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03541-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tenets of 'good quality' colon cancer surgery include mesocolic plane dissection to preserve an intact mesocolic fascia/peritoneum, and excision of sufficient mesocolon for adequate lymphadenectomy. However, it remains controversial what clinicopathological factors determine 'good quality' surgery, and whether quality of surgery influences morbidity/mortality. This study documents the quality of colon cancer surgery at a quaternary referral centre and identifies factors that influence quality of surgery and post-operative outcomes. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent resection for colon adenocarcinoma at St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK (2015-2017), were included. Primary outcome measures included (i) plane of mesocolic dissection, prospectively assessed; and (ii) tissue morphometry (area of mesentery and vascular pedicle length). Other histopathological data were extracted from a prospective database. Clinical data were obtained from the National Bowel Cancer Audit and individual records. RESULTS Four hundred five patients were included (mean 69.6 years). The majority (67.4%) of specimens were mesocolic plane dissections. Median area of mesentery excised was 12,085.4 mm2. Median vascular pedicle length was 89.3 mm. Post-operative complication was recorded in one-third of patients. Mesocolic plane excision was associated with open surgery (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.09), especially in emergency colectomy. Open resections also had a greater mesentery excised (P = 0.002), but incurred more post-operative complication (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.12-3.99). Post-operative complication was not associated with plane of excision or tissue morphometry. CONCLUSION Majority of resections were 'optimal' mesocolic plane dissections. Open resections yielded better quality specimens, but incurred more morbidity. There is room for improvement in the quality of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, particularly those performed as emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kheng-Seong Ng
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. .,RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, University of Sydney, 145-147 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nigel Scott
- Department of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Melanie Holzgang
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Phil Quirke
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David G Jayne
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Academic Surgery, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Tenma JR, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Iversen ER, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Rasmussen LA, Jepsen LV, Born PW, Kristensen B, Kleif J. 5-year outcome after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:1556-1565. [PMID: 31526695 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30485-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of extensive lymph node dissection as performed in complete mesocolic excision are still debated, although recent studies have shown an association with improved long-term outcomes. However, none of these studies had an intention-to-treat design or aimed to show a causal effect; therefore in this study, we aimed to estimate the causal oncological treatment effects of complete mesocolic excision on right-sided colon cancer. METHODS We did a population-based cohort study involving prospective data collected from four hospitals in Denmark. We compared the oncological outcome data of patients at one centre performing central lymph node dissection and vascular division after almost complete exposure of the proximal part of the superior mesenteric vein (ie, the complete mesocolic excision group) with three other centres performing conventional resections with unstandardised and limited lymph node dissection (ie, non-complete mesocolic excision; control group). We included data for all patients in the Capital Region of Denmark undergoing elective curative-intent right-sided colon resections for stages I-III colon cancer, as categorised by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC; 5th edition), from June 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2013. Patients were followed-up for 5·2 years after surgery. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of recurrence after 5·2 years of surgery. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk analyses were used to estimate the possible causal effects of complete mesocolic excision. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03754075. FINDINGS 1069 patients (813 in the control group and 256 in the complete mesocolic excision group) underwent curative-intent elective surgery for right-sided colon cancer during the study period. None of the patients were lost to follow-up regarding survival or recurrence status, and consequently no patient was censored in the analyses. The 5·2-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 9·7% (95% CI 6·3-13·1) in the complete mesocolic excision group compared with 17·9% (15·3-20·5) in the control group, and the absolute risk reduction of complete mesocolic excision after 5·2 years was 8·2% (95% CI 4·0-12·4; p=0·00015). In the control group, 145 (18%) of 813 patients were diagnosed with a recurrence and 281 (35%) died during follow-up, whereas in the complete mesocolic excision group 25 (10%) of 256 patients were diagnosed with a recurrence and 75 (29%) died during follow-up. INTERPRETATION This study shows a causal treatment effect of central mesocolic lymph node excision on risk of recurrence after resection for right-sided colon adenocarcinoma. Complete mesocolic excision has the potential to reduce the risk of recurrence and improve long-term outcome after resection for all UICC stages I-III of right-sided colon adenocarcinomas. FUNDING The Tvergaard Fund, Helen Rude Fund, Krista and Viggo Petersen Fund, Olga Bryde Nielsen Fund, and Else and Mogens Wedell-Wedellsborg Fund.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus A Bertelsen
- Department of Surgery, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark.
| | - Anders U Neuenschwander
- Department of Surgery, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Jens E Jansen
- Department of Surgery, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Jutaka R Tenma
- Department of Surgery, Bispebjerg University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Wilhelmsen
- Gastro Unit, Surgical Division, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Anders Kirkegaard-Klitbo
- Department of Surgery, Bispebjerg University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Surgery, Herlev University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Else R Iversen
- Department of Surgery, Herlev University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Bols
- Department of Pathology, Herlev University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Peter Ingeholm
- Department of Pathology, Herlev University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Leif A Rasmussen
- Department of Surgery, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Lars V Jepsen
- Department of Surgery, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Pernille W Born
- Department of Surgery, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Bent Kristensen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Herlev University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jakob Kleif
- Department of Surgery, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vermeer NCA, Backes Y, Snijders HS, Bastiaannet E, Liefers GJ, Moons LMG, van de Velde CJH, Peeters KCMJ. National cohort study on postoperative risks after surgery for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer. BJS Open 2018; 3:210-217. [PMID: 30957069 PMCID: PMC6433330 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The decision to perform surgery for patients with T1 colorectal cancer hinges on the estimated risk of lymph node metastasis, residual tumour and risks of surgery. The aim of this observational study was to compare surgical outcomes for T1 colorectal cancer with those for more advanced colorectal cancer. Methods This was a population‐based cohort study of patients treated surgically for pT1–3 colorectal cancer between 2009 and 2016, using data from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit. Postoperative complications (overall, surgical, severe complications and mortality) were compared using multivariable logistic regression. A risk stratification table was developed based on factors independently associated with severe complications (reintervention and/or mortality) after elective surgery. Results Of 39 813 patients, 5170 had pT1 colorectal cancer. No statistically significant differences were observed between patients with pT1 and pT2–3 disease in the rate of severe complications (8·3 versus 9·5 per cent respectively; odds ratio (OR) 0·89, 95 per cent c.i. 0·80 to 1·01, P = 0·061), surgical complications (12·6 versus 13·5 per cent; OR 0·93, 0·84 to 1·02, P = 0·119) or mortality (1·7 versus 2·5 per cent; OR 0·94, 0·74 to 1·19, P = 0·604). Male sex, higher ASA grade, previous abdominal surgery, open approach and type of procedure were associated with a higher severe complication rate in patients with pT1 colorectal cancer. Conclusion Elective bowel resection was associated with similar morbidity and mortality rates in patients with pT1 and those with pT2–3 colorectal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N C A Vermeer
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Y Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands.,Department of Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - H S Snijders
- Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis Gouda The Netherlands
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden The Netherlands
| | - G J Liefers
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden The Netherlands
| | - L M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands.,Department of Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden The Netherlands
| | - K C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
The importance of surgery in colorectal cancer treatment. Lancet Oncol 2018; 20:6-7. [PMID: 30545751 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30679-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
16
|
Negoi I, Beuran M, Hostiuc S, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Vartic M, Pinkney T. Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer is technically challenging but the most oncological appealing. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:79. [PMID: 30505966 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.10.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ionut Negoi
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of General Surgery, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mircea Beuran
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of General Surgery, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Sorin Hostiuc
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Legal Medicine and Bioethics, National Institute of Legal Medicine Mina Minovici, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Mihaela Vartic
- Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Thomas Pinkney
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Spinoglio G, Bianchi PP, Marano A, Priora F, Lenti LM, Ravazzoni F, Petz W, Borin S, Ribero D, Formisano G, Bertani E. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Treatment of Colon Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and 5-Year Survival in a Consecutive Series of 202 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3580-3586. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6752-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
18
|
Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU. The safety of complete mesocolic excision once again confirmed. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:552. [PMID: 29161768 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C A Bertelsen
- Department of Surgery, North Zealand Hospital Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A U Neuenschwander
- Department of Surgery, North Zealand Hospital Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|