1
|
Colombari RC, Alsourani A, Sánchez-Rodríguez M, Aguilera-Jiménez E, Jiménez LM, Tejedor P. Technical pearls in D3 lymph node dissection for right-sided colon cancer-A video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1474-1475. [PMID: 38671585 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adnan Alsourani
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Elena Aguilera-Jiménez
- Advanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Miguel Jiménez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Tejedor
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ryu HS, Kim HJ, Ji WB, Kim BC, Kim JH, Moon SK, Kang SI, Kwak HD, Kim ES, Kim CH, Kim TH, Noh GT, Park BS, Park HM, Bae JM, Bae JH, Seo NE, Song CH, Ahn MS, Eo JS, Yoon YC, Yoon JK, Lee KH, Lee KH, Lee KY, Lee MS, Lee SH, Lee JM, Lee JE, Lee HH, Ihn MH, Jang JH, Jeon SK, Chae KJ, Choi JH, Pyo DH, Ha GW, Han KS, Hong YK, Hong CW, Kwak JM. Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Ann Coloproctol 2024; 40:89-113. [PMID: 38712437 PMCID: PMC11082542 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00059.0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients' values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyo Seon Ryu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Cochrane Collaboration, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woong Bae Ji
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
| | - Byung Chang Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ji Hun Kim
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Kyung Moon
- Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Il Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Han Deok Kwak
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eun Sun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Hyun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Tae Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyoung Tae Noh
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Soo Park
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Hyeung-Min Park
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Jeong Mo Bae
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Bae
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ni Eun Seo
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Hoon Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Mi Sun Ahn
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jae Seon Eo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Chul Yoon
- Department of General Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon-Kee Yoon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Kyung Ha Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Kyung Hee Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kil-Yong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Myung Su Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hak Lee
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Min Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Ji Eun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Han Hee Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myong Hoon Ihn
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Je-Ho Jang
- Department of Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sun Kyung Jeon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kum Ju Chae
- Department of Radiology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Jin-Ho Choi
- Center for Lung Cancer, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dae Hee Pyo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi Won Ha
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Kyung Su Han
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Young Ki Hong
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chang Won Hong
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jung-Myun Kwak
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Korean Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Cochrane Collaboration, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of General Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
- Center for Lung Cancer, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aiolfi A, Bona D, Rausa E, Manara M, Biondi A, Basile F, Campanelli G, Kelly ME, Bonitta G, Bonavina L. Effect of complete mesocolic excision (cme) on long-term survival after right colectomy for cancer: multivariate meta-analysis and restricted mean survival time estimation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:80. [PMID: 38429427 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03273-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Debate exists concerning the impact of complete mesocolic excision (CME) on long-term oncological outcomes. The aim of this review was to condense the updated literature and assess the effect of CME on long-term survival after right colectomy for cancer. METHODS PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through July 2023. The included studies evaluated the effect of CME on survival. The primary outcome was long-term overall survival. Restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. GRADE methodology was used to summarize the certainty of evidence. RESULTS Ten studies (3665 patients) were included. Overall, 1443 (39.4%) underwent CME. The RMSTD analysis shows that at 60-month follow-up, stage I-III CME patients lived 2.5 months (95% CI 1.1-4.1) more on average compared with noCME patients. Similarly, stage III patients that underwent CME lived longer compared to noCME patients at 55-month follow-up (6.1 months; 95% CI 3.4-8.5). The time-dependent HRs analysis for CME vs. noCME (stage I-III disease) shows a higher mortality hazard in patients with noCME at 6 months (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.71), 12 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.73), and 24 months (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.92) up to 27 months. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that CME is associated with unclear OS benefit in stage I-III disease. Caution is recommended to avoid overestimation of the effect of CME in stage III disease since the marginal benefit of a more extended resection may have been influenced by tumor biology/molecular profile and multimodal adjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Aiolfi
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy.
| | - Davide Bona
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Rausa
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Manara
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Biondi
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, G. Rodolico Hospital, Surgical Division, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco Basile
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, G. Rodolico Hospital, Surgical Division, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giampiero Campanelli
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Bonitta
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brown KGM, Ng KS, Solomon MJ, Chapuis PH, Koh CE, Ahmadi N, Austin KKS. Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: current status and controversies. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:309-319. [PMID: 37850417 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
According to Hohenberger's original description, complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer involves precise dissection of the avascular embryonic plane between the parietal retroperitoneum and visceral peritoneum of the mesocolon. This ensures mesocolic integrity, access to high ligation of the supplying vessels at their origin and an associated extended lymphadenectomy. Results from centres which have adopted this approach routinely have demonstrated that oncological outcomes can be improved by the rigorous implementation of established principles of cancer surgery. Meticulous anatomical dissection along embryonic planes is a well-established principle of precision cancer surgery used routinely by the specialist colorectal surgeon. Therefore, the real question concerns the need for true central vascular ligation and associated extended (D3) lymphadenectomy or otherwise, particularly along the superior mesenteric vessels when performing a right colectomy. Whether this approach results in improved overall or disease-free survival remains unclear and its role remains controversial particularly given the potential for significant morbidity associated with a more extensive central vascular dissection. Current literature is limited by considerable bias, as well as inconsistent and variable terminology, and the results of established randomized trials are awaited. As a result of the current state of equipoise, various national guidelines have disparate recommendations as to when complete mesocolic excision should be performed if at all. This article aims to review the rationale for and technical aspects of complete mesocolic excision, summarize available short and long term outcome data and address current controversies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian G M Brown
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pierre H Chapuis
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cherry E Koh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nima Ahmadi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirk K S Austin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grüter AA, Sijmons JM, Coblijn UK, Toorenvliet BR, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. Best Evidence for Each Surgical Step in Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2023; 4:e343. [PMID: 38144490 PMCID: PMC10735091 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for each surgical step of the minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) for non-locally advanced colon cancer, to define the most optimal procedure with the highest level of evidence. Background High variability exists in the way MIRH is performed between surgeons and hospitals, which could affect patients' postoperative and oncological outcomes. Methods A systematic search using PubMed was performed to first identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and if there were none then landmark papers and consensus statements were systematically searched for each key step of MIRH. Systematic reviews were assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool, and selection was based on highest quality followed by year of publication. Results Low (less than 12 mmHg) intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) gives higher mean quality of recovery compared to standard IAP. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is associated with lowest recurrence and highest 5-year overall survival rates, without worsening short-term outcomes. Routine D3 versus D2 lymphadenectomy showed higher LN yield, but more vascular injuries, and no difference in overall and disease-free survival. Intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with better intra- and postoperative outcomes. The Pfannenstiel incision gives the lowest chance of incisional hernias compared to all other extraction sites. Conclusion According to the best available evidence, the most optimal MIRH for colon cancer without clinically involved D3 nodes entails at least low IAP, CME with D2 lymphadenectomy, an intracorporeal anastomosis and specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A.J. Grüter
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julie M.L. Sijmons
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Usha K. Coblijn
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter J. Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B. Tuynman
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tsukamoto S, Ouchi A, Komori K, Shiozawa M, Yasui M, Ohue M, Nogami H, Takii Y, Moritani K, Kanemitsu Y. A multicenter prospective observational study of lymph node metastasis patterns and short-term outcomes of extended lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:940-948. [PMID: 37927926 PMCID: PMC10623977 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The lymph node metastasis rate in right-sided colon cancer is unknown, and the optimal central vascular ligation level remains controversial. We aimed to determine the lymph node metastasis rate and short-term results of radical surgery with extended lymph node dissection in right-sided colon cancer. Methods This prospective multicenter observational study included patients with stage II/III right-sided colon cancer from five cancer hospitals. The metastasis rate of each node station was analyzed according to tumor location and main feeding artery. Results Between April 2018 and August 2021, 208 patients underwent dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and vein (SMV). In transverse colon cancer, 7.5% and 2.5% of metastases occurred around the SMV and SMA at the root of the middle colic artery (MCA), respectively; 6.7% and 6.7% at the root of the right colic artery. In caecal cancer, 1.9% of metastases occurred around the SMV and 1.9% around the SMA. In ascending colon cancer, the rate was 1.1% around the SMV. Of the tumors, 17% fed mainly by the ileocolic artery had node metastases along the middle or right colic artery, as did 66.7% fed mainly by the right colic artery and 41.2% fed by the MCA (p = 0.01). Postoperative complications occurred in 42 patients (20.2%). Conclusion Routine prophylactic extended lymphadenectomy around the SMA might not be necessary in caecum and ascending colon cancer. Dissection around the SMA may be necessary in cases of transverse colon cancer or when the feeding artery is the MCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Tsukamoto
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Akira Ouchi
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryAichi Cancer Center HospitalAichiJapan
| | - Koji Komori
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryAichi Cancer Center HospitalAichiJapan
| | - Manabu Shiozawa
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Masayoshi Yasui
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Masayuki Ohue
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Hitoshi Nogami
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryNiigata Cancer Center HospitalNiigataJapan
| | - Yasumasa Takii
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryNiigata Cancer Center HospitalNiigataJapan
| | - Konosuke Moritani
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu X, Tong Y, Xie D, Li H, Shen J, Gong J. Surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (D3 + CME) for colon cancer: A prospective single-center cohort study. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10095-w. [PMID: 37138192 PMCID: PMC10338606 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10095-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complete mesocolic excision (CME) or D3 lymphadenectomy led to survival benefits for locally advanced right colon cancer, but with vague definitions in anatomy and debated surgical hazard in clinic. Aiming to achieve a precise definition of it in anatomy, we proposed laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (D3 + CME) as a novel procedure for colon cancer. However, the surgical and oncological results of this procedure in clinic were uncertain. METHODS We performed a cohort study involving prospective data collected from a single-center in China. Data from all patients who underwent right hemicolectomy between January 2014 and December 2018 were included. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes between D3 + CME and conventional CME. RESULTS After implementation of exclusion criteria, a total of 442 patients were included. D3 + CME group performed better in lymph nodes harvested (25.0 [17.0, 33.8] vs. 18.0 [14.0, 25.0], P < 0.001) and the proportion of intraoperative blood loss ≥ 50 mL (31.7% vs. 51.8%, P < 0.001); no significant difference was observed in the complication rates between two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that a better cumulative 5-year disease-free survival (91.3% vs. 82.2%, P = 0.026) and a better cumulative 5-year overall survival (95.2% vs. 86.1%, P = 0.012) were obtained in the D3 + CME group. Multivariate COX regression revealed that D3 + CME was an independent protective factor for disease-free survival (P = 0.026). CONCLUSION D3 + CME could improve surgical and oncological outcomes simultaneously for right colon cancer compared to conventional CME. Large-scale randomized controlled trials were further required to confirm this conclusion, if possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolin Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Av, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Yixin Tong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Av, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Daxing Xie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Av, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Haijie Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Av, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Av, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianping Gong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Av, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sica GS, Vinci D, Siragusa L, Sensi B, Guida AM, Bellato V, García-Granero Á, Pellino G. Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:846-861. [PMID: 36097099 PMCID: PMC9944740 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09548-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation. METHODS PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques. RESULTS Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique. CONCLUSIONS The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe S Sica
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. .,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Danilo Vinci
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea M Guida
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Bellato
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Ospedale IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Álvaro García-Granero
- Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma, Spain.,Applied Surgical Anatomy Unit, Human Embryology and Anatomy Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Human Embryology and Anatomy Department, University of Islas Baleares, Palma, Spain
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.,Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
SEGURA MJ, LOZOYA R, ALARCÓN M, GÓMEZ M, SOLANA A, RUIZ MD, CHECA F. Intestinal occlusion and ileocolic invagination due to cecum adenocarcinoma. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2022. [DOI: 10.23736/s0394-9508.21.05279-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
10
|
Complete Mesocolic Excision and Extent of Lymphadenectomy for the Treatment of Colon Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2022; 31:293-306. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
11
|
Liu S, Li L, Sun H, Chen B, Yu M, Zhong M. D3 Versus D2 Lymphadenectomy in Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Surg Innov 2022; 29:416-425. [PMID: 35102792 DOI: 10.1177/15533506211060230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer improves oncological outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare operation data, histopathological characteristics, perioperative conditions, and long-term survival after D3 and D2 lymphadenectomy in right hemicolectomy. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles (up to March 31, 2020). Random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analysis models were used. Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 and Stata version 15.1 were used for pooled estimates. RESULTS After screening 714 articles, 7 articles with a total of 1368 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared with D2, D3 lymphadenectomy improves results in terms of blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -20.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] -28.19 to -13.16, P < .01), harvested lymph nodes (WMD = 8.86, 95% CI 7.74 to 9.98, P < .01), 3-year overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.03, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.43, P < .01), 5-year OS (HR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.30, P = .02), and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.90, P = .01). There was no significant difference regarding operation time, anastomosis leakage, wound infection, overall morbidity, postoperative hospital stay, mortality, length of dissected colon, and 3-year DFS (P >= .05). CONCLUSIONS It is suggested in this review that D3 lymphadenectomy is superior to D2 lymphadenectomy in terms of blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, 3-year OS, 5-year OS, and 5-year DFS. The conclusion must be drawn with caution due to the limited number of included studies. Further RCTs are needed for stronger evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sailiang Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, 71140Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
| | - Laiyuan Li
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, China
| | - Haojie Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, 71140Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
| | - Bojie Chen
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, 71140Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
| | - Minhao Yu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, 71140Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
| | - Ming Zhong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, 71140Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Son GM, Lee IY, Lee YS, Kye BH, Cho HM, Jang JH, Kim CN, Lee KY, Lee SH, Kim JG. Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer? Ann Coloproctol 2021; 37:434-444. [PMID: 34875818 PMCID: PMC8717068 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2021.00955.0136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Colon cancer treatment is on the way to evolution over several decades. The minimally invasive surgery has improved postoperative short-term outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy has prolonged the survival of advanced colon cancer patients. Hohenberger proposed the noble concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) which consists of 3 components: plane surgery, sufficient longitudinal bowel resection, and central vascular ligation (CVL). Mesocolic plane surgery shares the same surgical principle of total mesorectal excision, which is maintaining the intact mesothelial envelope. However, there remain debates about the extent of bowel resection and the level of CVL for maximizing lymph node dissection. There is no solid clinical evidence for the oncological necessity and benefit of extended radical dissection in right hemicolectomy. CME with CVL based on open surgery has been adopted in laparoscopic surgery. So, it is also necessary to look at how the CME could be transformed and successfully implanted in the laparoscopic era. Recent rapid advances in surgical technology and cancer biology are preparing for fundamental changes in cancer surgery. In this study, we reviewed the history, oncological necessity, and compatibility of CME for the right hemicolectomy in the laparoscopic era and outline the new perspectives on the evolution of cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gyung Mo Son
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine,Yangsan, Korea
| | - In Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine,Yangsan, Korea
| | - Yoon Suk Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bong-Hyeon Kye
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hyeon-Min Cho
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Je-Ho Jang
- Department of Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Chang-Nam Kim
- Department of Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Kil Yeon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk-Hwan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun-Gi Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Surgery, Pyeongtaek St. Mary's Hospital, Pyeongtaek, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bedrikovetski S, Dudi-Venkata NN, Kroon HM, Seow W, Vather R, Carneiro G, Moore JW, Sammour T. Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1058. [PMID: 34565338 PMCID: PMC8474828 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08773-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in medical imaging analysis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI models used for detection of lymph node metastasis on pre-operative staging imaging for colorectal cancer. Methods A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using a literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, IEEE Xplore and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2010 to October 2020. Studies reporting on the accuracy of radiomics models and/or deep learning for the detection of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer by CT/MRI were included. Conference abstracts and studies reporting accuracy of image segmentation rather than nodal classification were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using a modified questionnaire of the QUADAS-2 criteria. Characteristics and diagnostic measures from each study were extracted. Pooling of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated in a meta-analysis. Results Seventeen eligible studies were identified for inclusion in the systematic review, of which 12 used radiomics models and five used deep learning models. High risk of bias was found in two studies and there was significant heterogeneity among radiomics papers (73.0%). In rectal cancer, there was a per-patient AUROC of 0.808 (0.739–0.876) and 0.917 (0.882–0.952) for radiomics and deep learning models, respectively. Both models performed better than the radiologists who had an AUROC of 0.688 (0.603 to 0.772). Similarly in colorectal cancer, radiomics models with a per-patient AUROC of 0.727 (0.633–0.821) outperformed the radiologist who had an AUROC of 0.676 (0.627–0.725). Conclusion AI models have the potential to predict lymph node metastasis more accurately in rectal and colorectal cancer, however, radiomics studies are heterogeneous and deep learning studies are scarce. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42020218004. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08773-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. .,Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Nagendra N Dudi-Venkata
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Warren Seow
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ryash Vather
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gustavo Carneiro
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning, School of Computer Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James W Moore
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ramser M, Kwok AMF, Maeda Y, Potter MA. Oncological and clinical outcomes after conventional right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:2781-2788. [PMID: 34505198 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02320-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed for better local control of colon cancer and to improve cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, CME may be associated with increased morbidity from bleeding during central vascular ligation. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of conventional right hemicolectomy, a traditional anatomical dissection along anatomical planes with radical excision of the central lymph nodes at the level of the origin of colic artery but without exposure of superior mesenteric vein and artery (SMV/SMA). METHOD This was a retrospective review of a cohort of all elective right hemicolectomies performed at a specialist tertiary unit during a five-year period (2011-2015). RESULTS Five-hundred-nineteen patients (271 female, a median age of 73.0 years (interquartile range (IQR) 65.0-80.0)) were included (Stage I disease: 2.7%, stage II: 53.2%, stage III: 33.3%, stage IV: 10.8%). At the latest follow-up (a median 47 months (IQR 29-67)), local recurrence occurred in 34 patients (6.6%). Three-year overall survival was 74.4% and 3-year CSS was 85.9%. Subgroup analysis for stage I-III showed local recurrence in 6.0%, sole distant recurrence in 7.6% while 19 patients (4.1%) suffered concomitant local and distant recurrence. The anastomotic leak rate was 1.0% and perioperative bleeding occurred in 1.2%. CONCLUSIONS Oncological outcomes comparable to those of CME can be achieved by conventional surgery but with low rates of bleeding complications and anastomotic leakage. The proposed advantages of CME should be carefully considered and balanced against patients' co-morbidities and potential complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Ramser
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, Crewe Rd South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.,Department of General Surgery, Kantonsspital Olten, Olten, Switzerland
| | - Allan M F Kwok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, Crewe Rd South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Yasuko Maeda
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, Crewe Rd South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK. .,Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Mark A Potter
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, Crewe Rd South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.,Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional hemicolectomy in patients with right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:881-892. [PMID: 33170319 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03797-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has introduced a promising surgical approach for treatment of right colon cancer. However, benefits of CME are still a matter of debate. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess safety and long-term outcomes of CME versus conventional right hemicolectomy (CRH). METHODS We systematically searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for retrieving studies comparing CME with CRH in right colon cancer. After data extraction from the included studies, meta-analysis was performed to compare postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, 30-day mortality, number of lymph node yield, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Eight studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1871 patients enrolled. No difference was observed in postoperative complications (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.47, p = 0.34). CME was associated with significantly higher number of lymph nodes retrieved (MD 9.17, CI 4.67-13.68, p < 0.001). CME also improved 3-year OS (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.17-2.11, p = 0.003), 5-year OS (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.89, p = 0.02), and 5-year DFS (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.29-3.07, p = 0.002). A sub-group analysis for patients with stage III colon cancer showed no significant impact of CME on 3-year and 5-year OS (OR 2.47, 95% CI 0.86-7.06, p = 0.09; OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.78-1.94, p = 0.38). CONCLUSION Although with limited evidence, CME shows similar postoperative complication rates and an improved survival outcome compared with CRH.
Collapse
|
16
|
D3-lymphadenectomy enhances oncological clearance in patients with right colon cancer. Results of a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1541-1551. [PMID: 33676793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND D3-Lymphadenectomy, together with complete mesocolic excision (CME), were introduced to provide oncological results after right colon cancer. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to assess the short and long-term outcomes of right-sided hemicolectomy with CME + D3 as compared with classic right hemicolectomy. Secondary aims included the prevalence of D3-metastasis and skip metastasis when performing CME + D3. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, according to PRISMA methodology. RESULTS 29 studies were enrolled (2592 patients). No differences were accounted in morbidity variables associated with the measured techniques. CME + D3 was significantly associated with a greater distance between the tumour and the closest vascular tie, a longer colonic resection, a wider resection of mesentery and an increased number of harvested lymph nodes. Regarding to long-terms outcomes, we found a significant decrease in local recurrence in patients undergoing CME + D3 (HR:0.17) and a significant improvement in 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates (HR:0.53 vs. HR:0.57, respectively), as well as an improving survival in patients with stage II and III disease. Overall prevalence of patients with lymphatic metastases in D3-territory was of 8.6% and 2.2% of skip metastases. CONCLUSIONS CME + D3 is a feasible surgical procedure that allows to obtain specimens with higher quality oncological resection, without greater associated morbidity, thus improving survival in patients with stage II and III right colon cancer.
Collapse
|
17
|
Neumann PA, Berlet MW, Friess H. Surgical oncology in the age of multimodality therapy for cancer of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:511-522. [PMID: 33355020 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1868991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To date, all efforts to fight gastrointestinal cancer, regardless of its origin and entity, have resulted in complex therapeutic regimens involving a combination of systemic therapy, radiation therapy and surgery. It is generally accepted across all disciplines that not one, but the combination and the proper timing of all modalities result in the best oncologic outcome. AREAS COVERED Here, we provide insight into the current and future value of multimodal therapeutic approaches for upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer. Various aspects of treatment as well as open questions regarding indication and timing of multimodal strategies are addressed in this review. EXPERT OPINION In order to further improve the survival and quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal tumors in the future, scientifically proven multimodal therapy concepts are needed first and foremost. In addition, markers are pivotal to assign individual patients to a specific concept and to monitor the success of therapy. The main question is in which situation a neoadjuvant, perioperative or adjuvant radio-, chemo- or immunotherapy is superior. In fact, almost every curatively intended concept still contains surgical resection. Thus, improvement in surgical technique is also critical for multimodality concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kong JC, Prabhakaran S, Choy KT, Larach JT, Heriot A, Warrier SK. Oncological reasons for performing a complete mesocolic excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91:124-131. [PMID: 33400369 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been shown to have an oncological benefit as compared to conventional colonic surgery for colon surgery, this benefit must be weighed up against the risk of major intra-abdominal complications. This paper aimed to assess the comparative oncological benefits of CME. METHODS Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature until May 2020 was performed. Comparative studies assessing CME versus conventional colonic surgery for colon cancer were compared, and outcomes were pooled. RESULTS A total of 700 publications were identified, of which 19 were found to meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 25 886 patients were compared, with 14 431 patients in the CME arm. CME was associated with a significantly higher rate of vascular injury (odds ratio 3, P < 0.001). Rates of local and distant recurrence were lower in the CME group (odds ratio 0.66 and 0.73, respectively, both P < 0.001). CME patients had a significantly higher lymph node yield (P < 0.001). While no significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of pooled 3- or 5-year disease-free survival, pooled 5-year overall survival was significantly higher in the CME group (relative risk 0.82, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Based on the available evidence, CME is associated with improved oncologic outcomes at the expense of higher complication rates, including vascular injury. The oncological benefits need to weighed up against a multitude of factors including the level of hospital support, surgeon experience, patient age, and associated comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Kong
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Swetha Prabhakaran
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kay T Choy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - José T Larach
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Departamento de Cirugía Digestiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Takahashi H, Miyoshi N, Uemura M, Mizushima T, Doki Y, Eguchi H. Indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic resection of small bowel carcinoma for definitive central vascular ligation - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:2347-2348. [PMID: 33245594 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - N Miyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - M Uemura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - T Mizushima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Y Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - H Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Matsuda T, Yamashita K, Hasegawa H, Utsumi M, Kakeji Y. Current status and trend of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020; 4:521-527. [PMID: 33005847 PMCID: PMC7511568 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) is utilized worldwide as one of the standard surgical treatments for right-sided colon cancer. However, there have been issues concerning its applicability, techniques, and trend. The present study aimed to elucidate the current status and trend of LRH by reviewing literature focusing on important issues associated with this surgery. Based on previous studies, LRH most likely provides better short-term outcomes and similar oncological outcomes compared to open surgery. Despite the increasing use of robotic approach in this surgery, it seems to have always been associated with longer operative times and greater hospital cost with limited advantage. Intracorporeal anastomosis seems to improve short-term outcomes, such as quicker recovery of bowel function, compared to extracorporeal anastomosis. However, it does not contribute to shorter hospital stay. With regard to dissection technique, various approaches, and landmarks have been advocated to overcome the technical difficulty in LRH. This difficulty is likely to be caused by anatomical variation, especially in venous structures. The superiority of one approach or landmark over another is still argued about due to the lack of large-scale prospective studies. However, deep understanding both of anatomical variation and characteristics of each approach would be of extreme importance to minimize adverse effects and maximize patient benefit after LRH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeru Matsuda
- Division of Gastrointestinal SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan
- Division of Minimally Invasive SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan
| | - Kimihiro Yamashita
- Division of Gastrointestinal SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan
| | - Hiroshi Hasegawa
- Division of Gastrointestinal SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan
| | - Masako Utsumi
- Division of Gastrointestinal SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Division of Gastrointestinal SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chakrabarti S, Peterson CY, Sriram D, Mahipal A. Early stage colon cancer: Current treatment standards, evolving paradigms, and future directions. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12:808-832. [PMID: 32879661 PMCID: PMC7443846 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colon cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity throughout the world despite the availability of reliable screening tools and effective therapies. The majority of patients with colon cancer are diagnosed at an early stage (stages I to III), which provides an opportunity for cure. The current treatment paradigm of early stage colon cancer consists of surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in a select group of patients, which is directed at the eradication of minimal residual disease to achieve a cure. Surgery alone is curative for the vast majority of colon cancer patients. Currently, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy can achieve long term survival in about two-thirds of colon cancer patients with nodal involvement. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for all patients with stage III colon cancer, while the benefit in stage II patients is not unequivocally established despite several large clinical trials. Contemporary research in early stage colon cancer is focused on minimally invasive surgical techniques, strategies to limit treatment-related toxicities, precise patient selection for adjuvant therapy, utilization of molecular and clinicopathologic information to personalize therapy and exploration of new therapies exploiting the evolving knowledge of tumor biology. In this review, we will discuss the current standard treatment, evolving treatment paradigms, and the emerging biomarkers, that will likely help improve patient selection and personalization of therapy leading to superior outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakti Chakrabarti
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
| | - Carrie Y Peterson
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
| | - Deepika Sriram
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yang Y, Peacock O, Malakorn S, Limvorapitak T, Zafar SN, Chang GJ. Superior Mesenteric Vein-First Approach for Robotic Salvage Surgery with Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:3500. [PMID: 32144622 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08222-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inadequate lymphadenectomy is still a major concern in colon cancer surgery. The superior mesenteric vein (SMV)-first approach is a novel, standardized, reproducible method for robotic complete mesocolic excision surgery. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to present the application of the SMV-first approach principles to facilitate robotic salvage surgery for recurrent disease within the mesocolon. METHODS A 78-year-old female presented with a malignant lymph node deposit within residual right mesocolonic tissue, approximately 3 months following a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Dissection was initiated with a transverse curvilinear incision along the inferior aspect of the remaining ileocolic pedicle to identify the SMV. Dissection continued along the ventral aspect of the SMV in a cephalad direction to identify and expose the middle colic vessels at their origin. The use of idocyanine green (ICG) confirmed the vascular anatomy, demonstrating the right branch of the middle colic artery traversing the malignant deposit in the residual mesocolon. Following ligation at the origin of the right branch of the middle colic and ileocolic vessels, the retro-mesocolic plane dissection was completed to excise the malignant deposit and the residual mesocolon. RESULTS The patient was discharged home the following day. The pathological specimen confirmed metastatic poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in one of nine lymph nodes, and the vascular pedicle resection margin was negative for tumor. CONCLUSION Following the SMV-first approach principles provides a safe plane for dissection, and, in conjunction with ICG, facilitates the delineation of the vascular anatomy, to enable robotic salvage surgery to be performed.1-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Yang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Oliver Peacock
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Songphol Malakorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thitithep Limvorapitak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Syed Nabeel Zafar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|