Unraveling the role of tumor sidedness in prognosis of stage II colon cancer

Background

Stage II colon cancer has varying risks for metastasis, and treatment strategies depend on molecular and clinicopathological features. While tumor-sidedness is a well-accepted prognostic factor for stage III/IV colon cancer, its role in stage II is controversial. Understanding its effect in stage II is crucial for improving treatment strategies.

Methods

We analyzed clinical and follow-up data of colon cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2017). Patients were divided into a primary study cohort (2010-2017) and a validation cohort (2004-2009). The baseline characteristics between right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC) groups were compared. Moreover, the effect of tumor size on cancer-specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

The study involved 87,355 patients in the study cohort and 65,858 in the validation cohort. Of the study cohort, 52.3% were diagnosed with RCC. The median age was 64 years old, with 48.5% females and 76.8% of white people. In addition, stage II RCC showed better CSS compared with LCC (5-year CSS 88.0% vs 85.5%, P < 0.001), while stage III/IV RCC demonstrated poorer outcomes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that the right-sidedness was a positive prognostic factor in stages I/II but negative in stages III (HR 1.10, P < 0.001) and IV (HR 1.26, P < 0.001). Chemotherapy rates decreased in RCC, particularly in stage II (RCC vs LCC: 16.2% vs 28.5%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis, stratified by T3/T4 stages and chemotherapy status, further highlighted better survival outcomes in RCC.

Conclusions

RCC is associated with a significantly better prognosis in stage II. The importance of considering tumor-sidedness in clinical decision-making and the design of future clinical trials should be emphasized.

HLA class II polymorphisms as prognostic biomarkers for right and left-sided colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer (CC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Characterization of new prognostic biomarkers for right-sided CC (RCC) and left-sided CC (LCC) may contribute to improving early detection. An association of human leukocyte antigens class II (HLA-II) with the predisposition to CC was suggested.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We evaluated the association of DRB1 and DQB1 with the risk of LCC and RCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study comprised 93 CC patients and 100 healthy controls. Genotyping of HLA class II alleles were performed by the Polymerase Chain Reaction Sequence-Specific Primers (PCR-SSP).

RESULTS

DRB1*03 was positively associated with CC. In contrast, DRB1*11, DRB1*13, DQB1*03, and DQB1*05 were negatively linked to CC. Haplotype analysis revealed that DRB1*04-DQB1*04 and DRB1*09-DQB1*02 were positive, while DRB1*01-DQB1*05, DRB1*04-DQB1*03, DRB1*07-DQB1*02, DRB1*11-DQB1*03, DRB1*11-DQB1*05, and DRB1*13-DQB1*06 were negatively associated with CC. For sigmoid CC, DRB1*13, DRB1*11, and DQB1*05 were negative, while DRB1*04-DQB1*02, and DRB1*07-DQB1*03 were positively associated. DRB1*03 and DRB1*04-DQB1*04 were positive, while DRB1*11 and DQB1*03 were negatively linked to RCC. According to the LCC, DRB1*07, DRB1*11, DQB1*03, DQB1*05, and DRB1*07-DQB1*02 were negative. In contrast, DRB1*09-DQB1*02 was positively associated with LCC. Stratified analysis revealed that DRB1*11 is associated with higher risk of metastasis in CC and sigmoid CC, and tolerance to treatment in RCC. DQB1*03 was associated with lymph-node invasion in CC.

CONCLUSION

DRB1 and DQB1 polymorphisms could be used as future biomarkers for the early detection of subjects at a higher risk of developing RCC and LCC, metastasis in sigmoid CC, and tolerance to treatment in RCC.

Surgical quality assessment for the prospective study of oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic modified complete mesocolic excision for nonmetastatic right colon cancer (PIONEER study)

BACKGROUND

The modified complete mesocolic excision (mCME) procedure for right-sided colon cancer is a tailored approach based on the original complete mesocolic excision (CME) methodology. Limited studies evaluated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic mCME using objective surgical quality assessments in patients with right colon cancer. The objectives of the PIONEER study were to evaluate oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic mCME and to identify optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values for standardizing laparoscopic right colon cancer surgery based on short-term outcomes of procedures performed by expert laparoscopic surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an ongoing prospective, multi-institutional, single-arm study conducted at five tertiary colorectal cancer centers in South Korea. Study registrants included 250 patients scheduled for laparoscopic mCME with right-sided colon adenocarcinoma (from the appendix to the proximal half of the transverse colon). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included 3-year overall survival, incidence of morbidity in the first 4 weeks postoperatively, completeness of mCME, central radicality, and distribution of metastatic lymph nodes. Survival data will be available after the final follow-up date (June 2024).

RESULTS

The postoperative complication rate was 12.9%, with a major complication rate of 2.7%. In 87% of patients, central radicality was achieved with dissection at or beyond the level of complete exposure of the superior mesenteric vein. Mesocolic plane resection with an intact mesocolon was achieved in 75.9% of patients, as assessed through photographs. Metastatic lymph node distribution varied by tumor location and extent. Seven optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values were identified based on the analysis of complications in low-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic mCME for right-sided colon cancer produced favorable short-term postoperative outcomes. The identified optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values can serve as a reference for evaluating surgical performance of this procedure.

Short- and Long-Term Survival among Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients in Finland, 2006-2015: A Nationwide Population-Based Registry Study

This population-based registry study aimed to report 30-day and one-year postoperative survival, five-year overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) among elderly (≥75 years old) colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. All new colorectal cancer cases from 2006-2015 were included and followed until death or the end of follow-up (end of 2016). Among 27,088 CRC patients, 11,306 patients were ≥75 years old. Among patients ≥ 75 years, 36.8% (n = 4160) had right-sided colon cancer, 21.9% (n = 2478) left-sided colon cancer, and 32.3% (n = 3650) rectal cancer. In this study population, 932 patients were aged ≥ 90. The 30-day postoperative OS for patients aged 75-79 was 96.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.3-96.9) falling to 93.2% (95% CI 92.0-94.4) for patients aged 80-84. The one-year postoperative OS among patients aged 75-79 was 86.3% (95% CI 84.7-87.9) compared with 80.5% (95% CI 78.7-82.3) among patients aged 80-84. Five-year OS among patients aged 75-79 was 47.6% (95% CI 46.0-49.2) and 36.6% (95% CI 34.8-38.4) among patients aged 80-84, compared with 61.7% (95% CI 60.9-62.5) among younger patients (<75 years old). Survival among elderly CRC patients (≥75 years old) was in general fairly good when compared with younger patients, especially among patients aged 75-79 and 80-84 with localized or locally advanced disease.

Best Evidence for Each Surgical Step in Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review

Objective

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for each surgical step of the minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) for non-locally advanced colon cancer, to define the most optimal procedure with the highest level of evidence.

Background

High variability exists in the way MIRH is performed between surgeons and hospitals, which could affect patients' postoperative and oncological outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search using PubMed was performed to first identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and if there were none then landmark papers and consensus statements were systematically searched for each key step of MIRH. Systematic reviews were assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool, and selection was based on highest quality followed by year of publication.

Results

Low (less than 12 mmHg) intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) gives higher mean quality of recovery compared to standard IAP. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is associated with lowest recurrence and highest 5-year overall survival rates, without worsening short-term outcomes. Routine D3 versus D2 lymphadenectomy showed higher LN yield, but more vascular injuries, and no difference in overall and disease-free survival. Intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with better intra- and postoperative outcomes. The Pfannenstiel incision gives the lowest chance of incisional hernias compared to all other extraction sites.

Conclusion

According to the best available evidence, the most optimal MIRH for colon cancer without clinically involved D3 nodes entails at least low IAP, CME with D2 lymphadenectomy, an intracorporeal anastomosis and specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision.

KRAS Mutation Status in Bulgarian Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

RAS somatic variants are predictors of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) and affect the outcome of the disease. Our study aimed to evaluate the frequency of RAS, with a focus on KRAS variants, and their association with tumor location and some clinicopathological characteristics in Bulgarian CRC patients. We prospectively investigated 236 patients with advanced and metastatic CRC. Genomic DNA was extracted from FFPE tumor tissue samples, and commercially available kits were used to detect RAS gene somatic mutations via real-time PCR. A total of 115 (48.73%) patients tested positive for RAS mutations, with 106 (44.92%) testing positive for KRAS mutations. The most common mutation in exon 2 was c.35G>T p.Gly12Val (32.56%). We did not find a significant difference in KRAS mutation frequency according to tumor location. However, patients with a mutation in exon 4 of KRAS were 3.23 times more likely to have a tumor in the rectum than in other locations (95% CI: 1.19-8.72, p = 0.021). Studying the link between tumor location and KRAS mutations in exon 4 is crucial for better characterizing CRC patients. Further research with larger cohorts, especially in rectal cancer patients, could provide valuable insights for patient follow-up and treatment selection.

Prediction values of tertiary lymphoid structures in the prognosis of patients with left- and right-sided colon cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are the lymphocyte aggregates that play a key role in the vast majority of solid tumors including colon cancer, displaying an antitumor effect under most circumstances. The heterogeneity between left- and right-sided colon cancer (LCC and RCC) encompasses various aspects, such as clinical manifestations, pathological features, and immune responses. However, the function and prognostic significance of TLS within LCC and RCC have yet to be fully understood.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 2612 patients who underwent radical resection for LCC or RCC without distant metastasis in multiple medical centers. Utilizing propensity score matching, 121 patients with LCC and 121 patients with RCC were selected for the training set. An external validation set including 64 patients with LCC and 64 patients with RCC were also employed. Hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining were used to assess TLS and the proportion of various immune cells. Clinical characteristics and prognostic values of TLS in patients with LCC and RCC were analyzed. Nomograms were constructed for LCC and RCC to predict 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS), respectively.

RESULTS

For LCC and RCC patients, TLS was located in the interstitial region or outside the tumor tissue and mainly consisted of B cells and T cells. The TLS quantity and density in RCC were higher than those of LCC. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, TLS density ( P =0.014), vascular invasion ( P =0.019), and AJCC stage ( P =0.026) were independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS of RCC. For LCC patients, AJCC stage ( P =0.024), tumor differentiation ( P =0.001), and tumor budding ( P =0.040) emerged as independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS. Similar results were obtained in the external verification set. Separate nomograms for RCC and LCC were developed, displaying improved prediction performance compared to the AJCC 8th edition TNM staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in TLS quantity and density were observed between LCC and RCC, suggesting that a nomogram based on TLS density could more effectively predict survival for RCC patients. Furthermore, a nomogram based on tumor budding was recommended for better prediction of LCC patient survival. Taken together, these results suggested that the immune and clinical characteristics of colon cancer at left and right side were substantially different, which may lead to the use of different prediction model and the development of individual treatment strategy.

Left-Sided Colon Cancer and Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Are They the Same Cancer or Two Different Entities?

Background Colon cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and one of the main causes of cancer-related deaths. In Morocco, it occupies the first place among digestive cancers. Right-sided and left-sided colon cancers have different embryological, epidemiological, pathological, genetic, and clinical characteristics. This distinction leads to differences in the evolution and prognosis of the disease. This study aimed to identify epidemiological factors and clinical and pathological characteristics that can influence perioperative and prognostic outcomes in patients with right-sided colon cancer compared to those with left-sided colon cancer. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study over a period of nine years from January 2012 until December 2020. We included 277 patients divided into two groups, namely, right colon cancer (group 1) (n = 99) and left colon cancer (group 2) (n = 178). Results The average age of our series was 57.4 years, with extremes ranging from 19 to 89 years old (SD = ±13.6451 years). The average age in the right colon group was 55.97 (SD = ±13.341 years). The average age in the left colon group was 58.18 (SD = ±13.69 years). The male gender had a predominance, with a sex ratio of 1.3 for both groups. Among the patients in group 2, 65% showed lymph node involvement on the CT scan, whereas only 34% of patients in group 1 displayed the same condition. The recurrence rate in the right-sided colon cancer group was 22.2% compared to 24.9% in the left-sided group. The five-year overall survival was estimated for the right-sided and left-sided colon cancer groups at 87% and 96.5%, respectively. In patients with stage III and IV cancer, overall survival was better for those who underwent surgery for left-sided colon cancer compared to those who underwent surgery for right-sided colon cancer (p = 0.029). In the case of vascular emboli or involvement of the perineural sheath, there was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.446 and p = 0.655, respectively). The three-month survival without recurrence was almost identical in both groups (31% for right-sided colon cancers and 30.9% for left-sided colon cancers). Age over 61 years was a predictive factor of poor prognosis in recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.245; p = 0.023). Conclusions We identified factors that can influence perioperative outcomes and prognosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer compared to those with left-sided colon cancer. Our findings suggest that age and lymph node involvement along with other factors play a role in the overall survival and recurrence outcomes of these patients. Further research is necessary to explore these differences and develop personalized treatment plans for patients with colon cancer.

Colon Cancer Microbiome Landscaping: Differences in Right- and Left-Sided Colon Cancer and a Tumor Microbiome-Ileal Microbiome Association

In the current era of precision oncology, it is widely acknowledged that CRC is a heterogeneous disease entity. Tumor location (right- or left-sided colon cancer or rectal cancer) is a crucial factor in determining disease progression as well as prognosis and influences disease management. In the last decade, numerous works have reported that the microbiome is an important element of CRC carcinogenesis, progression and therapy response. Owing to the heterogeneous nature of microbiomes, the findings of these studies were inconsistent. The majority of the studies combined colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC) samples as CRC for analysis. Furthermore, the small intestine, as the major site for immune surveillance in the gut, is understudied compared to the colon. Thus, the CRC heterogeneity puzzle is far from being solved, and more research is necessary for prospective trials that separately investigate CC and RC. Our prospective study aimed to map the colon cancer landscape using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing in biopsy samples from the terminal ileum, healthy colon tissue, healthy rectal tissue and tumor tissue as well as in preoperative and postoperative stool samples of 41 patients. While fecal samples provide a good approximation of the average gut microbiome composition, mucosal biopsies allow for detecting subtle variations in local microbial communities. In particular, the small bowel microbiome has remained poorly characterized, mainly because of sampling difficulties. Our analysis revealed the following: (i) right- and left-sided colon cancers harbor distinct and diverse microbiomes, (ii) the tumor microbiome leads to a more consistent cancer-defined microbiome between locations and reveals a tumor microbiome-ileal microbiome association, (iii) the stool only partly reflects the microbiome landscape in patients with CC, and (iv) mechanical bowel preparation and perioperative antibiotics together with surgery result in major changes in the stool microbiome, characterized by a significant increase in the abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria, such as Enterococcus. Collectively, our results provide new and valuable insights into the complex microbiome landscape in patients with colon cancer.

[Recent Advances on the Differences between Left- and Right-sided Colorectal Cancer]

Right-sided colon cancer and left-sided colorectal cancer have significant differences in epidemiology,clinical features,tumor differentiation,response to treatment,prognosis,and molecular characteristics.The former has lower prevalence than the latter and is mainly associated with female and elderly patients,with poor tumor differentiation,strong invasion,poor prognosis,and weak response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.Thus,it is generally believed that the primary location of colorectal cancer is closely associated with prognosis,acting as an independent prognostic factor for therapeutic efficacy.Recent studies have revealed the genetic differences between right-sided colon cancer and left-sided colorectal cancer,providing explanations for the biological differences.This review summarizes the recent advances on the differences between left-and right-sided colorectal cancer.

Lymph node status and its impact on the prognosis of left-sided and right-sided colon cancer: A SEER population-based study

Background

Some significant differences exist between the outcomes of left‐ and right‐sided colon cancer patients. The presence of nodal metastases is a critical prognostic factor, especially in the absence of distant metastasis. Our research studied the lymph nodes status of left‐ and right‐sided colon cancer patients to determine the influence of this factor on prognosis.

Methods

Our data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We used the chi‐square test to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics. The X‐tile program was adopted to acquire optimal cutoff points of lymph node index. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to analyze prognosis and multivariate Cox regression models were performed to identify the independent factors associated with survival. Nomograms were built to predict the overall survival of patients, Harrell's C‐index and calibration plots were used to validate the nomograms.

Results

The study included 189,941 patients with colon cancer without metastasis (left 69,885, right 120,056) between 2004 and 2015. There are more patients with adequate examined lymph nodes in right‐sided. Lymph node status in patients with right colon cancer has a more significant impact on the risk of death. LODDS (C‐index: 0.583; AIC: 6875.4) was used to assess lymph node status. The nomograms showed that lymph node status was the main factor to predict the outcome in right‐sided colon patients.

Conclusions

The influence of lymph node status on predicting prognosis is significantly different between patients with left and right colon cancer without metastasis. The tumor site needs to be considered when lymph node status is used to assess the outcome of patients.

SPARCL1 exhibits different expressions in left- and right-sided colon cancer and is downregulated via DNA methylation

Aim: The authors previously found that SPARCL1 functions to suppress colorectal cancer metastasis. Here, the epigenetic mechanism of SPARCL1 regulation and its relationship with clinicopathological features in colon cancer were investigated. Materials & methods: SPARCL1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry staining in a tissue array containing 271 left-sided colon cancer samples and 257 right-sided colon cancer samples. In vivo and in vitro DNA methylation states were measured by biochemical sulfide potential assay. The transcription and DNA methylation states in cells were altered by siRNA or decitabine treatment, respectively. Cellular motility properties were compared through transwell assay. Results & conclusion: SPARCL1, mediated by its DNA methylation, may arrest colorectal carcinoma motility. Furthermore, SPARCL1 expression is higher and may have a specific prognostic value in left-sided colon cancer.

Genomic Analysis Reveals Heterogeneity Between Lesions in Synchronous Primary Right-Sided and Left-Sided Colon Cancer

Background: The synchronous primary right-sided and left-sided colon cancer (sRL-CC) is a peculiar subtype of colorectal cancer. However, the genomic landscape of sRL-CC remains elusive. Methods: Twenty-eight paired tumor samples and their corresponding normal mucosa samples from 14 patients were collected from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from 2011 to 2018. The clinical-pathological data were obtained, and whole-exome sequencing was performed based on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of these patients, and then, comprehensive bioinformatic analyses were conducted. Results: Both the lesions of sRL-CC presented dissimilar histological grade and differentiation. Based on sequencing data, few overlapping SNV signatures, onco-driver gene mutations, and SMGs were identified. Moreover, the paired lesions harbored a different distribution of copy number variants (CNVs) and loss of heterozygosity. The clonal architecture analysis demonstrated the polyclonal origin of sRL-CC and inter-cancerous heterogeneity between two lesions. Conclusion: Our work provides evidence that lesions of sRL-CC share few overlapping mutational signatures and CNVs, and may originate from different clones.

The impact of primary tumor sidedness on survival in early-onset colorectal cancer by stage: A National Veterans Affairs retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is rising. Left-sided colorectal cancer (LCC) is associated with better survival compared to right-sided colon cancer (RCC) in metastatic disease. NCCN guidelines recommend the addition of EGFR inhibitors to KRAS/NRAS WT metastatic CRC originating from the left only. Whether laterality impacts survival in locoregional disease and EOCRC is of interest.

METHODS

65,940 CRC cases from the National VA Cancer Cube Registry (2001-2015) were studied. EOCRC (2096 cases) was defined as CRC diagnosed at <50 years. Using ICD codes, RCC was defined from the cecum to the hepatic flexure (C18.0-C18.3), and LCC from the splenic flexure to the rectum (C18.5-18.7; C19 and C20).

RESULTS

EOCRC is more likely to originate from the left side (66.65% LCC in EOCRC vs. 58.77% in CRC). Overall, LCC has better 5-year Overall Survival (OS) than RCC in stages I (61.67% vs. 58.01%) and III (46.1% vs. 42.1%) and better 1-year OS in stage IV (57.79% vs. 49.49%). Stage II RCC has better 5-year OS than LCC (53.39% vs. 49.28%). In EOCRC, there is no statistically significant difference between LCC and RCC in stages I-III. Stage IV EOCRC patients with LCC and RCC have a 1-year OS of 73.23% and 59.84%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In EOCRC, LCC is associated with better OS than RCC only stage IV. In the overall population, LCC is associated with better OS in all stages except stage II. The better prognosis of stage II RCC might be due to the high incidence of mismatch repair deficient tumors in this subpopulation.

Hemicolectomy Does Not Provide Survival Benefit for Right-Sided Mucinous Colon Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The extent of bowel resection is widely debated in colon cancer surgery. Right hemicolectomy (RHC) and partial colectomy (PC) are the most common operation options for right-sided colon cancer (RCC). However, there are still no treatment guidelines or published studies to guide surgical options for mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) of RCC.

METHODS

Patients with MAC and non-specific adenocarcinoma (AC) of RCC who underwent RHC and PC from 2010 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrieved. The general characteristics and survival were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 27,910 RCC patients were enrolled in this study, among them 3,413 were MAC. The results showed that race, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, perineural invasion (PNI), tumor size, tumor location, TNM stage, liver metastasis, chemotherapy were significantly different between MAC and AC groups. The MAC group had similar dissected lymph nodes, but more positive lymph nodes than the AC group. The overall survival (OS) of the MAC group was poorer than that of the AC group, but cancer-specific survival (CSS) was similar between the two groups. The RHC subgroup of the MAC group had more patients of age ≤60 years, larger tumor size, cecum/ascending colon location and dissected lymph nodes than the PC subgroup, but similar positive lymph nodes, perioperative mortality, OS and CSS as the PC subgroup. Moreover, the univariate and multivariable analyses for the survival of RCC patients with MAC showed that RHC might not be a superior predictor for OS and CSS compared with PC.

CONCLUSIONS

RHC could not dissect more positive lymph nodes or provide long-term survival benefits for RCC patients with MAC compared with PC. This study could provide some evidence for surgery treatment selection for MAC of RCC, which has important clinical value in individual management of colon cancer patients.

Microbial Community Profiling Distinguishes Left-Sided and Right-Sided Colon Cancer

The difference between left- and right-sided colon cancer has become the focus of global attention, and researchers have found differences in the morbidity, molecular biological characteristics, and response to targeted drug therapy between left- and right-sided colon cancer. Therefore, the identification of more effective predictive indicators is critical for providing guidance to future clinical work. We collected samples from different colon sites and regions and analyzed the identities and distributions of differentially expressed species in the microbiota in the left and right sides of the colon to better explore the pathogenesis of colon cancer and provided a basis for individualized drug therapy. We collected samples from different regions in the body of 40 patients with colon cancer, including stool and tissues. The Subjects were classified into four groups, and this classification was mainly based on the colon cancer distribution. The microbiota composition of the left-sided and right-sided colon samples was assessed by specifically amplifying the V3-V4 region of the 16S rDNA gene from DNA extracts from the samples. These amplicons were examined by Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing. The microbial taxa in the left-sided colon samples are more abundant than those in the right-sided colon samples. The flora in the left-sided colon samples, such as Clostridium perfringens and Fusobacterium nucleatum, might be associated with VEGF expression and are more likely to promote colon cancer. The microbiota distribution in the right-sided colon samples is less invasive and harmful and particularly rich in Bifidobacterium dentium. In addition, Streptococcus, which is the target of EGFR, was found to be expressed in both the left- and right-sided colon samples but was found at a higher level in the left-sided colon samples. Additionally, the differential pathways involved in the left-sided colon samples mainly mediate DNA damage, methylation, and histone modifications, whereas those in the right-sided colon samples are dominated by DNA synthesis. The comparison of only the geographical differences revealed a significant difference in the distribution of the microbial population. The adherent microbiota composition and structural changes between the left- and right-sided colon samples might contribute to the development of colon cancer, lead to different morbidities, and further affect the prognosis of patients and their sensitivity to targeted drugs. Therefore, the identification of the differential flora in the colon could be used as an indicator for predicting the occurrence and development of colon cancer, which is also beneficial for future individualized drug therapy.

A Qualitative Transcriptional Signature for Predicting CpG Island Methylator Phenotype Status of the Right-Sided Colon Cancer

A part of colorectal cancer which is characterized by simultaneous numerous hypermethylation CpG islands sites is defined as CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) status. Stage II and III CIMP−positive (CIMP+) right-sided colon cancer (RCC) patients have a better prognosis than CIMP−negative (CIMP−) RCC treated with surgery alone. However, there is no gold standard available in defining CIMP status. In this work, we selected the gene pairs whose relative expression orderings (REOs) were associated with the CIMP status, to develop a qualitative transcriptional signature to individually predict CIMP status for stage II and III RCC. Based on the REOs of gene pairs, a signature composed of 19 gene pairs was developed to predict the CIMP status of RCC through a feature selection process. A sample is predicted as CIMP+ when the gene expression orderings of at least 12 gene pairs vote for CIMP+; otherwise the CIMP−. The difference of prognosis between the predicted CIMP+ and CIMP− groups was more significantly different than the original CIMP status groups. There were more differential methylation and expression characteristics between the two predicted groups. The hierarchical clustering analysis showed that the signature could perform better for predicting CIMP status of RCC than current methods. In conclusion, the qualitative transcriptional signature for classifying CIMP status at the individualized level can predict outcome and guide therapy for RCC patients.

The prognosis and recurrence pattern of right- and left- sided colon cancer in Stage II, Stage III, and liver metastasis after curative resection

Purpose

Primary tumor location of colon cancer has been reported to affect the prognosis after curative resection. However, some reports suggested the impact was varied by tumor stage. This study analyzed the prognostic impact of the sidedness of colon cancer in stages II, III, and liver metastasis after curative resection using propensity-matched analysis.

Methods

Right-sided colon cancer was defined as a tumor located from cecum to splenic flexure, while any more distal colon cancer was defined as left-sided colon cancer. Patients who underwent curative resection at Nara Medical University hospital between 2000 and 2016 were analyzed.

Results

There were 110 patients with stage II, 100 patients with stage III, and 106 patients with liver metastasis. After propensity matching, 28 pairs with stage II and 32 pairs with stage III were identified. In the patients with stage II, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were not significantly different for right- and left-sided colon cancers. In the patients with stage III, OS and RFS were significantly worse in right-sided colon cancer. In those with liver metastasis, OS of right-sided colon cancer was significantly worse than left-sided disease, while RFS was similar. Regarding metachronous liver metastasis, the difference was observed only in the patients whose primary colon cancer was stage III. In each stage, significantly higher rate of peritoneal recurrence was found in those with right-sided colon cancer.

Conclusion

Sidedness of colon cancer had a significant and varied prognostic impact in patients with stage II, III, and liver metastasis after curative resection.

Primary tumor location impacts survival in colorectal cancer patients after resection of liver metastases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Right-sided colon cancers (R-CC) are associated with worse outcomes compared to left-sided colon cancers (L-CC). We hypothesize that R-CC with synchronous liver metastases who undergo resection of primary and metastatic sites have worse survival and that survival will vary significantly among R-CC, L-CC, and rectal cancer (ReC).

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2016 was used to identify colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who underwent surgical resection of both primary and metastatic disease. Survival was analyzed by multivariate Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2275 patients were included; 38% R-CC, 46% L-CC, and 16% ReC. R-CC primary tumors tended to be larger than 5 cm, higher grade, and mucinous (all P < .001). Compared to patients with R-CC, both L-CC and ReC had improved overall (HR 0.72; P < .001; HR 0.75, P = .006) and disease-specific (HR 0.71, P < .001; HR 0.73, P = .008) survival. There was no difference in survival between L-CC and ReC.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with R-CC have significantly worse survival than L-CC or ReC. This provides additional evidence that R-CC tumors are fundamentally different from L-CC and ReC tumors. Future studies should determine factors responsible for this disparity, and identify targeted treatment based on primary tumor location.

Comparison of outcomes of complete mesocolic excision with conventional radical resection performed by laparoscopic approach for right colon cancer

Background

This retrospective study compared the outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) guided by superior mesenteric artery with laparoscopic conventional radical resection (CRR) performed for right-sided colon cancer.

Methods

Patients with right-sided colon cancer underwent CME (n=107; January 2011 to December 2015) or CRR (n=60; January 2008 to December 2010).

Results

The 2 groups were comparable regarding age, gender, body mass index, maximum tumor diameter, and tumor stage. In the CME group, the distances between the tumor and the high vascular tie (HVT; 12.6 cm), and between the closest bowel wall and HVT (10.4±0.9 cm) was significantly greater than that of the CRR group (11.5 cm and 9.3±1.0 cm, respectively; P<0.001). In the CME group, the number of retrieved lymph nodes (23.2) was significantly higher, and the volume of intraoperative bleeding (108.4 mL) was less than that of the CRR (14.0 and 128.7 mL; P<0.001). The length of resected bowel in the 2 groups was similar (25.8±0.7 cm and 25.5±2.1 cm; P=0.106), as was the operative time, postoperative hospitalization, time of first bowel movement, and complications. The 3-year recurrence rate of the CME group (8.4%) was significantly lower than that of the CRR (20.0%), the 3-year overall survival was significantly higher (93.5% cf. 85.0%), and the survival rates of T4 stage, N1 stage, pTNM stage II, pTNM stage III and lympho vascular invasion were significantly higher (P<0.05). The 2 groups were similar for survival rates of Tis, T1, T2, T3, N2 stage, pTNM stage I and perineural invasion (P>0.05).

Conclusion

CME for right-sided colon cancer guided by superior mesenteric artery has similar short-term outcomes, higher lymph node yield, and higher 3-year overall survival compared with CRR.

Right- and left-sided stage III colon cancers present different prognostic outcomes of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection

Background

Growing evidence has suggested that right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC) should be considered as different tumor entities. However, stage III colon cancer is currently treated as the same entity with uniform therapy. This study was aimed at investigating the prognostic influence of tumor location in patients with stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 274 eligible patients with stage III colon cancer undergoing curative tumor resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine between December 2007 and December 2013. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests, and prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression methods.

Results

Patients with RCC exhibited lower hemoglobin levels (23.6% vs. 9.8%; P = 0.002), larger tumor size (60.6% vs. 40.9%; P = 0.001), and a higher proportion of 12 or more resected lymph nodes (86.4% vs. 64.6%; P < 0.001) than patients with LCC. Grade 1 neurotoxicity was more common in patients with RCC than in those with LCC (53.6% vs. 40.9%; P = 0.037). RCC was significantly associated with a shorter 3-year OS than LCC, whereas a difference was noted only for stage IIIC and not stage IIIA or stage IIIB colon cancer. Multivariate analyses revealed that RCC was independently associated with a worse 3-year OS (hazard ratio: 2.213; 95% CI: 1.063–4.606; P = 0.002). In addition, an increase in 3-year OS and DFS after 6–8 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy was only observed in patients with RCC and not in those with LCC.

Conclusion

This study indicated that RCC has a worse prognostic outcome for stage III colon cancer, and a full course of adjuvant chemotherapy should be suggested for patients with RCC.

Is there a prognostic value of tumor location among Chinese patients with colorectal cancer?

Differences in epidemiology, pathological features, and molecular pathogeneses have been observed according to primary tumor location in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, predicting CRC survival by tumor location remains controversial. Therefore, we compared the pathological characteristics, molecular features, and prognoses of right-side colon cancer (RCC), left-side colon cancer (LCC), and rectal cancer (RECC) among Chinese patients with CRC. We evaluated 4,426 patients with stage I–III CRC between January 2008 and July 2014from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. All patients were grouped by the locations of tumors (RCC, LCC, and RECC). Patients with RCC were more likely to be women and older, have poorly differentiated tumors, microsatellite repair deficiency (dMMR), negative p53 expression, and the mucinous subtype. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed survival in RCC than in LCC and RECC. However, there were no significant differences in OS and DFS between LCC and RECC. The same results were observed for each disease stage. Unadjusted models revealed an increased risk of mortality, recurrence, or metastasis for RCC (OS: HR, 1.68, P=0.0002 and DFS: HR, 1.24, P=0.032), compared to LCC (all stages), and a similar result was observed for stage III patients (OS: HR, 1.79, P<0.0001 and DFS: HR, 1.33, P=0.021). However, adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models revealed no significant differences in survival between the three tumor locations. Tumor location was not an independent prognostic factor among Chinese patients with stage I-III CRC. But RCCs had a worse prognosis in the dMMR subgroup. The related mechanism remains to be investigated.

Comparison of survival between right-sided and left-sided colon cancer in different situations

Mountain of studies has showed that right‐sided colon cancer (RSCC) and left‐sided colon cancer (LSCC) have different clinical presentation and biologic features and should be considered as two distinct disease entities. The survival difference between RSCC and LSCC remains controversial. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified colon adenocarcinoma patients from 2004 to 2013. The 5‐year cause‐specific survival (CSS) was our primary endpoint. All statistical analyses were performed using the Intercooled Stata 13.0. All statistical tests were two‐sided. The study included 95,847 (58.72%) RSCC and 67,385 (41.28%) LSCC patients. RSCC patients were older, more often females, more Caucasian, more unmarried, more advanced T and N stage, larger tumor sizes, and more poorly differentiated tumor, while LSCC patients had more stage IV diseases. Location was an independent prognostic factor in the multivariable analysis. Compared with RSCC patients, the hazard ratio for LSCC was 0.87, 95% CI: 0.85–0.89 P < 0.001. There was no survival difference between RSCC and LSCC in the following situations: older than 68 years old, T3–4, N0, poorly differentiated, and undifferentiated diseases. We firstly reported that RSCC patients had a better prognosis than LSCC in mucinous adenocarcinoma/signet ring cell carcinoma patients. RSCC patients also had a better prognosis than LSCC in stage II disease. There is a need for further subdivisions when analyzing the survival difference between RSCC and LSCC patients. RSCC had lower mortality rate than LSCC in stage II disease and mucinous adenocarcinoma/signet ring cell carcinoma patients.

The impact of three-dimensional reconstruction on laparoscopic-assisted surgery for right-sided colon cancer

Introduction

During laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery (LACS) for right-sided colon cancer patients, we performed three-dimensional (3D) surgical simulation to investigate vascular anatomy, including the ileocolic artery (ICA), right colic artery (RCA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV).

Aim

We also used 3D imaging to examine the shortest distance from the root of the ileocolic vein (ICV) to the gastrocolic trunk (GCT).

Material and methods

We analyzed 46 right-sided colon cancer patients who underwent 3D-simulated LACS. We also examined a control group of 20 right-sided colon cancer patients who underwent LACS without 3D imaging. Patients who received such assessments were classified into the following two groups based on the vessel arrangement patterns of the ICA and SMV: the type A group, in which the ICA crosses anterior to the SMV, and the type B group, in which the ICA crosses posterior to the SMV. The shortest length from the root of the ICV to the GCT (D mm) was measured via 3D imaging. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes for these three groups were compared.

Results

The mean D mm for all cases was 29.2 ±5.21 mm. Mean D mm values for the type A and type B groups were 27.8 ±4.21 and 30.5 ±5.53 mm, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss was lower in the type A group (41.8 ±27.5 g) and the type B group (44.5 ±31.6 g) than that in the control group (86.8 ±27.5 g) (p = 0.013).

Conclusions

3D imaging was useful for understanding anatomical relationships during LACS.