1
|
de Almeida Leite RM, Araujo SEA, Callado GY, Bossie H, Ricciardi R. Oncologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: an ACS-NSQIP analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:341. [PMID: 39287882 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02097-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
Robotic colectomy has been associated with comparable or improved short-term morbidity and mortality when compared to laparoscopic colectomy, including shorter length of stay. In this study, we sought to understand oncologic advantages for robotic as compared to laparoscopic colectomy in colon cancer. We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participant user files for all elective colon cancer cases from 1/2016 through 12/2021 performed with minimally invasive surgical techniques (robotic and laparoscopic). We calculated relative risks (RR) through Poisson Regression models and treatment effect coefficients by propensity-score match, after adjusting for age, BMI, ASA scores, mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation, emergency surgery, race, gender, smoking status, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Analyzed outcomes included rate of chemotherapy initiation within 90 days of surgery, number of harvested lymph nodes, any occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, and the need for ostomy. During the study period, 44,745 patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy for colon cancer; 39,614 in the laparoscopic cohort and 7,831 in the robotic cohort. After adjusting for confounders, robotic colectomy was associated with a significant increase in the likelihood for initating chemotherapy within 90 days (RR 1.98, 95% CI {1.86-2.10}, p < 0.001). The robotic-treated patients had a significantly more lymph nodes harvested, a significant decrease in the need for intraperative or postoperative blood transfusion (RR 0.64, 95% CI {0.57-0.71}, p < 0.001) and a significant reduction in the need for ostomy formation (RR 0.26, 95% CI {0.22-0.30}, p < 0.001). As a retrospective and non-randomized study, residual bias and confouding variables are likely to exist. The study is also subject to coding incompleteness and inaccuracies. We also do not have additional context on potential factors that might influence time to chemotherapy. In addition, there is no information on surgeon or hospital volume, which can be associated with outcomes. Robotic colectomy for colon cancer was associated with significant improvement in the rate of chemotherapy initiation within 90 days, a significant reduction in need for blood transfusions, and a lower likelihood of receiving an ostomy when compared to laparoscopic colectomy procedures. The data reveal substantial short-term gains in oncologic outcomes for colon cancer performed with robotic techniques.
Collapse
|
2
|
Norte A, Martínez C, Pasalodos A, Tort I, Sánchez A, Hernández P, Bollo J, Targarona EM. Impact of the laparoscopic approach, early closure and preoperative stimulation on outcomes of ileostomy closure after rectal resection. Cir Esp 2024:S2173-5077(24)00148-0. [PMID: 38908513 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the clinical outcome of early closure of a protective ileostomy and preoperative stimulation of the efferent limb in a cohort of patients with rectal cancer treated surgically, primarily using the laparoscopic approach. METHODS We performed an observational retrospective cohort study in a prospectively recorded series of patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery with a protective loop ileostomy between 2017 and 2022. Ileostomy closure was programmed for within 3 months after surgery. All patients underwent stimulation of the efferent limb. Primary outcomes were morbidity and mortality, length of stay (LOS), and re-admission. RESULTS Between 2017 and 2022, 108 patients underwent resection for rectal cancer and protective ileostomy. The laparoscopic approach was performed in 84.3% of patients (n = 91). Permanent ileostomy was performed in 5 patients (4.6%). Ileostomy closure was thus performed in 95.4% of patients (n = 103). Median time to closure was 74.5 days (range 57-113). In 63.1% (n = 65) of patients, reconstructive surgery was performed within 90 days. Prior to closure, efferent limb stimulation was performed in 77.8% (n = 84) of patients. Global morbidity was 26.2% (n = 27) (85.19%, n = 23 Clavien-Dindo I and 7.41%, n = 2 Clavien-Dindo II). The main causes of morbidity were postoperative ileus (10.7%, n = 11) and rectal bleeding (8.7%, n = 9). Anastomosis leakage occurred in 2 patients. Median hospital stay was 6 days (5-7). Readmission was needed in 6.8% (n = 7) of patients. CONCLUSION A previous laparoscopic approach, early closure and stimulation of the efferent limb could be a useful strategy to reduce the morbidity and mortality of temporary ileostomy closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Norte
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Service of General Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona 08027, Spain
| | - Carmen Martínez
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Service of General Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona 08027, Spain.
| | - Ana Pasalodos
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Service of General Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona 08027, Spain
| | - Ivette Tort
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Service of General Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona 08027, Spain
| | - Anna Sánchez
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Service of General Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona 08027, Spain
| | - Pilar Hernández
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Service of General Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona 08027, Spain
| | - Jesús Bollo
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Service of General Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona 08027, Spain
| | - Eduard Maria Targarona
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Service of General Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona 08027, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smart N. Defunctioning loop ileostomies - making better decisions. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:835-836. [PMID: 38790150 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Smart
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
He F, Tang C, Yang F, Chen D, Xiong J, Zou Y, Zhao D, Qian K. Preoperative risk factors and cumulative incidence of temporary ileostomy non-closure after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:94. [PMID: 38610000 PMCID: PMC11010286 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03363-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Temporary ileostomy (TI) has proven effective in reducing the severity of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery; however, some ileostomies fail to reverse over time, leading to conversion into a permanent stoma (PS). In this study, we aimed to investigate the preoperative risk factors and cumulative incidence of TI non-closure after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis after searching the Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases from their inception until November 2023. We collected all published studies on the risk factors related to TI non-closure after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. RESULTS A total of 1610 studies were retrieved, and 13 studies were included for meta-analysis, comprising 3026 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the identified risk factors included older age (p = 0.03), especially > 65 years of age (p = 0.03), male sex (p = 0.009), American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3 (p = 0.004), comorbidity (p = 0.001), and distant metastasis (p < 0.001). Body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative albumin, preoperative carcinoma embryonic antigen, tumor location, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, smoking, history of abdominal surgery, and open surgery did not significantly change the risk of TI non-closure. CONCLUSION We identified five preoperative risk factors for TI non-closure after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. This information enables surgeons to identify high-risk groups before surgery, inform patients about the possibility of PS in advance, and consider performing protective colostomy or Hartmann surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan He
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Chenglin Tang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Fuyu Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Defei Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Junjie Xiong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Yu Zou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Dongqin Zhao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Kun Qian
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calleja R, Medina-Fernández FJ, Bergillos-Giménez M, Durán M, Torres-Tordera E, Díaz-López C, Briceño J. A comprehensive evaluation of 80 consecutive robotic low anterior resections: impact of not mobilizing the splenic flexure alongside low-tie vascular ligation as a standardized technique. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:156. [PMID: 38565813 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01917-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Rectal cancer surgery represents challenges due to its location. To overcome them and minimize the risk of anastomosis-related complications, some technical maneuvers or even a diverting ileostomy may be required. One of these technical steps is the mobilization of the splenic flexure (SFM), especially in medium/low rectal cancer. High-tie vascular ligation may be another one. However, the need of these maneuvers may be controversial, as especially SFM may be time-consuming and increase the risk of iatrogenic. The objective is to present the short- and long-term outcomes of a low-tie ligation combined with no SFM in robotic low anterior resection (LAR) for mid- and low rectal cancer as a standardized technique. A retrospective observational single-cohort study was carried out at Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain. 221 robotic rectal resections between Jul-18th-2018 and Jan-12th-2023 were initially considered. After case selection, 80 consecutive robotic LAR performed by a single surgeon were included. STROBE checklist assessed the methodological quality. Histopathological, morbidity and oncological outcomes were assessed. Anastomotic stricture occurrence and distance to anal verge were evaluated after LAR by rectosigmoidoscopy. Variables related to the ileostomy closure such as time to closure, post-operative complications or hospital stay were also considered. The majority of patients (81.2%) presented a mid-rectal cancer and the rest, lower location (18.8%). All patients had adequate perfusion of the anastomotic stump assessed by indocyanine green. Complete total mesorectal excision was performed in 98.8% of the patients with a lymph node ratio < 0.2 in 91.3%. The anastomotic leakage rate was 5%. One patient (1.5%) presented local recurrence. Anastomosis stricture occurred in 7.5% of the patients. The limitations were small cohort and retrospective design. The non-mobilization of the splenic flexure with a low-tie ligation in robotic LAR is a feasible and safe procedure that does not affect oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Calleja
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute (IMIBIC), Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Medina-Fernández
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute (IMIBIC), Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Córdoba, Spain.
- Unit of Coloproctology General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
| | - Manuel Bergillos-Giménez
- Unit of Coloproctology General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Manuel Durán
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute (IMIBIC), Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Eva Torres-Tordera
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute (IMIBIC), Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Córdoba, Spain
- Unit of Coloproctology General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
| | - César Díaz-López
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute (IMIBIC), Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Córdoba, Spain
- Unit of Coloproctology General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Javier Briceño
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute (IMIBIC), Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Z, Guo Y, Li S, He L, Zhao Y, Wang Q. What affects the selection of diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study. BMC Surg 2024; 24:30. [PMID: 38263089 PMCID: PMC10804464 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02316-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The selection of diverting ileostomy (DI) is controversial. This study aimed to explore the factors affecting the selection of diverting ileostomy (DI) following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS This retrospective, case-control study included patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted sphincter-saving surgery for mid-low rectal cancer from January 2019 to June 2021. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the patient's clinicopathological characteristics and pelvic dimensions measured by abdominopelvic electron beam computed tomography. RESULTS A total of 382 patients were included in the analysis, of which 182 patients (47.6%) did not undergo DI, and 200 patients (52.4%) underwent DI. The univariate analysis suggested that male sex (p = 0.003), preoperative radiotherapy (p < 0.001), patients with an anastomosis below the levator ani plane (p < 0.001), the intertuberous distance (p < 0.001), the sacrococcygeal distance (p = 0.025), the mid pelvis anteroposterior diameter (p = 0.009), and the interspinous distance (p < 0.001) were associated with performing DI. Multivariate analysis confirmed that preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.037, odds ratio [OR] = 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-8.30), anastomosis below the levator ani plane (p < 0.001, OR = 7.09, 95% CI = 4.13-12.18), and the interspinous distance (p = 0.047, OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.93-1.00) were independently associated with performing DI. CONCLUSION Pelvic parameters also influence the choice of DI. According to this single-center experience, patients with a shorter interspinous distance, particularly narrow pelvic with an interspinous distance of < 94.8 mm, preoperative radiotherapy, and anastomosis below the levator ani plane, prefer to have a DI and should be adequately prepared by the physician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Wang
- Department of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China
| | - Yuchen Guo
- Department of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China
| | - Shuang Li
- Department of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China
| | - Liang He
- Department of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China
| | - Yinquan Zhao
- Department of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China
| | - Quan Wang
- Department of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Calleja R, Medina-Fernández FJ, Vallejo-Lesmes A, Durán M, Torres-Tordera EM, Díaz-López CA, Briceño J. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic approach in rectal cancer: a single-center short-term analysis based on the learning curve. Updates Surg 2023; 75:2179-2189. [PMID: 37874533 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01655-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
As a novel procedure becomes more and more used, knowledge about its learning curve and its impact on outcomes is useful for future implementations. Our aim is (i) to identify the phases of the robotic rectal surgery learning process and assess the safety and oncological outcomes during that period, (ii) to compare the robotic rectal surgery learning phases outcomes with laparoscopic rectal resections performed before the implementation of the robotic surgery program. We performed a retrospective study, based on a prospectively maintained database, with methodological quality assessment by STROBE checklist. All the procedures were performed by the same two surgeons. A total of 157 robotic rectal resections from June 2018 to January 2022 and 97 laparoscopic rectal resections from January 2018 to July 2019 were included. The learning phase was completed at case 26 for surgeon A, 36 for surgeon B, and 60 for the center (both A & B). There were no differences in histopathological results or postoperative complications between phases, achieving the same ratio of mesorectal quality, circumferential and distal resection margins as the laparoscopic approach. A transitory increase of major complications and anastomotic leakage could occur once overcoming the learning phase, secondary to the progressive complexity of cases. Robotic rectal cancer surgery learning curve phases in experienced laparoscopic surgeons was completed after 25-35 cases. Implementation of a robotic rectal surgery program is safe in oncologic terms, morbidity, mortality and length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Calleja
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain.
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
| | - Francisco Javier Medina-Fernández
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Ana Vallejo-Lesmes
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Manuel Durán
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Eva M Torres-Tordera
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - César A Díaz-López
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Javier Briceño
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Collard MK, Rullier E, Tuech JJ, Sabbagh C, Souadka A, Loriau J, Faucheron JL, Benoist S, Dubois A, Dumont F, Germain A, Manceau G, Marchal F, Sourrouille I, Lakkis Z, Lelong B, Derieux S, Piessen G, Laforest A, Venara A, Prudhomme M, Brigand C, Duchalais E, Ouaissi M, Lebreton G, Rouanet P, Mège D, Pautrat K, Reynolds IS, Pocard M, Parc Y, Denost Q, Lefevre JH. Is Delaying a Coloanal Anastomosis the Ideal Solution for Rectal Surgery?: Analysis of a Multicentric Cohort of 564 Patients From the GRECCAR. Ann Surg 2023; 278:781-789. [PMID: 37522163 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the specific results of delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) in light of its 2 main indications. BACKGROUND DCAA can be proposed either immediately after a low anterior resection (primary DCAA) or after the failure of a primary pelvic surgery as a salvage procedure (salvage DCAA). METHODS All patients who underwent DCAA intervention at 30 GRECCAR-affiliated hospitals between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively included. RESULTS Five hundred sixty-four patients (male: 63%; median age: 62 years; interquartile range: 53-69) underwent a DCAA: 66% for primary DCAA and 34% for salvage DCAA. Overall morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality were 57%, 30%, and 1.1%, respectively, without any significant differences between primary DCAA and salvage DCAA ( P = 0.933; P = 0.238, and P = 0.410, respectively). Anastomotic leakage was more frequent after salvage DCAA (23%) than after primary DCAA (15%), ( P = 0.016).Fifty-five patients (10%) developed necrosis of the intra-abdominal colon. In multivariate analysis, intra-abdominal colon necrosis was significantly associated with male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.67 95% CI: 1.22-6.49; P = 0.020], body mass index >25 (OR = 2.78 95% CI: 1.37-6.00; P = 0.006), and peripheral artery disease (OR = 4.68 95% CI: 1.12-19.1; P = 0.030). The occurrence of this complication was similar between primary DCAA (11%) and salvage DCAA (8%), ( P = 0.289).Preservation of bowel continuity was reached 3 years after DCAA in 74% of the cohort (primary DCAA: 77% vs salvage DCAA: 68%, P = 0.031). Among patients with a DCAA mannered without diverting stoma, 75% (301/403) have never required a stoma at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS DCAA makes it possible to definitively avoid a stoma in 75% of patients when mannered initially without a stoma and to save bowel continuity in 68% of the patients in the setting of failure of primary pelvic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime K Collard
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Eric Rullier
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Saint André Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Jacques Tuech
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Charles Nicole, Rouen, France
| | - Charles Sabbagh
- Department of General and Digestive surgery, Amiens Hospital, France
| | - Amine Souadka
- Department of General and Digestive surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Rabat, Marocco
| | - Jérome Loriau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Faucheron
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Unversitaire de Grenoble, France
| | - Stéphane Benoist
- Department of General and Digestive surgery, Hôpital du Kremlin-Bicêtre, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Anne Dubois
- Department of General and Digestive surgery, CHU Clermont-Ferrand Site Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Frédéric Dumont
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Institut de cancérologie de l'ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Adeline Germain
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Nancy, France
| | - Gilles Manceau
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Marchal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | | | - Zaher Lakkis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Besancon, Besancon, France
| | - Bernard Lelong
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Simon Derieux
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses-Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Huriez, Lille, France
| | - Anaïs Laforest
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Institute Monsouris, Paris, France
| | - Aurélien Venara
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire d'Angers, France
| | - Michel Prudhomme
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Nîmes, France
| | - Cécile Brigand
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires, Strasbourg, France
| | - Emilie Duchalais
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, France
| | - Mehdi Ouaissi
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Trousseau - CHRU Hôpitaux de Tours, Chambray-lès-Tours, France
| | - Gil Lebreton
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, CHU côte de Nâcre, Caen, France
| | - Philippe Rouanet
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Diane Mège
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Karine Pautrat
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Ian S Reynolds
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marc Pocard
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrère, Paris, France
| | - Yann Parc
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Quentin Denost
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Bordeaux Colorectal Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jérémie H Lefevre
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|