The effect of excessive fat tissue on the measure of bone mineral density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: the impact of substantial weight loss following sleeve gastrectomy

Whole-body vibration may not affect bone mineral density and bone turnover in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: A preliminary study

CONTEXT

Spinal-cord injury (SCI) induces bone loss and dramatically increases the risk of fracture.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) on areal bone mineral density (aBMD), whole body composition and bone biological parameters in individuals with chronic-state SCI.

DESIGN

Randomized study.

SETTING

Centre Neurologique PROPARA.

PARTICIPANTS

Fourteen subjects were randomly assigned to a WBV or a control group.

INTERVENTIONS

WBV (20-45 min, 30-45 Hz, 0.5 g) was performed in verticalized persons twice weekly for 6 months.

OUTCOME MEASURES

aBMD was measured by DXA at baseline and 6 months and bone biological parameters at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

No significant aBMD change was found in either the WBV or control group after 6 months of follow-up. Similarly, periostin, sclerostin and bone turnover markers remained relatively stable throughout follow-up and no difference in variation was observed within-group and between groups. Except for whole-body fat mass, which showed a significant decrease in the WBV group compared to controls, no difference in changes was observed, whatever the localization for fat and lean body mass.

CONCLUSIONS

During the chronic phase, aBMD and bone remodeling reach a new steady state. However, the DXA technique and the bone markers, including sclerostin and periostin, both of which reflect bone cell activity influenced by mechanical strain, showed that the bone tissue of individuals with SCI was insensitive to 6 months of WBV training at the study dose. Nevertheless, results of this preliminary study that was underpowered need to be confirmed and other modalities of WBV may be more effective in improving aBMD of this population.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

N°IDRCB:2011-A00224-37.

Comparison of the Lunar Prodigy and Stratos DR Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers to Assess Regional Bone Mineral Density

PURPOSE

The first objective of the study was to assess the agreement between the Stratos DR (DMS) and the GE Prodigy (GE) DXAs in determining femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine aBMD. The second objective was to assess the potential impact of leg positioning (hip flexed at 90° or not) on lumbar spine aBMD.

METHODS

Forty-six individuals (n=42 women, 91.3%), with a mean age of 59.7 ± 13 years and mean BMI of 23.8 ± 4.7 kg/m², were scanned consecutively on the same day using the two devices. In a subgroup (n=30), two consecutive Stratos DR scans (with hip flexed at 90° or not) at the lumbar spine were conducted. Predictive equations for hip and lumbar spine aBMD were derived from linear regression of the data.

RESULTS

Correlation coefficients for aBMD measured with the two DXAs were characterised by an R² of 0.76 for the femoral neck, 0.89 for the total hip, and 0.86 for the lumbar spine. However, the derived equations for aBMD determination showed an intercept significantly different from 0 for hip aBMD, and a slope significantly different from 1 for lumbar spine aBMD. These results highlight a bias between the two measurements, thus requiring the determination of specific cross-calibration equations for hip and lumbar spine, femoral neck excepted. When compared with values on the Prodigy, mean aBMD on the Stratos DR was higher at the femoral neck (+4.8%, p<0.001) and total hip (+9.6%, p<0.001) and lower at L2-L4 (-8.8%, p<0.001). The coefficient of variation (CV%) for the two consecutive measures at lumbar spine (with different positioning) with the Stratos DR was 2.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in aBMD measured with the two DXAs illustrates the need to define cross-calibration equations when comparing data across systems in order to avoid erroneous conclusions.

Bone Metabolism in Adolescents Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

PURPOSE

The prevalence of childhood obesity has increased over past decades with a concomitant increase in metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). While MBS in adults is associated with bone loss, only a few studies have examined the effect of MBS on the growing skeleton in adolescents.

METHODS

This mini-review summarizes available data on the effects of the most commonly performed MBS (sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass) on bone in adolescents. A literature review was performed using PubMed for English-language articles.

RESULTS

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and BMD Z scores decreased following all MBS. Volumetric BMD (vBMD) by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) decreased at the lumbar spine while cortical vBMD of the distal radius and tibia increased over a year following sleeve gastrectomy (total vBMD did not change). Reductions in narrow neck and intertrochanteric cross-sectional area and cortical thickness were observed over this duration, and hip strength estimates were deleteriously impacted. Marrow adipose tissue (MAT) of the lumbar spine increased while MAT of the peripheral skeleton decreased a year following sleeve gastrectomy. The amount of weight loss and reductions in lean and fat mass correlated with bone loss at all sites, and with changes in bone microarchitecture at peripheral sites.

CONCLUSION

MBS in adolescents is associated with aBMD reductions, and increases in MAT of the axial skeleton, while sleeve gastrectomy is associated with an increase in cortical vBMD and decrease in MAT of the peripheral skeleton. No reductions have been reported in peripheral strength estimates.

The quantitative ultrasound method for assessing low bone mass in women with anorexia nervosa

This study investigated the potential role of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) to assess low bone mass in anorexia nervosa patients (AN). Bone parameters from QUS and DXA were positively correlated and significantly reduced in AN compared with controls, suggesting that QUS is a pertinent technique to assess low bone mass in these patients.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of an alternative technique, quantitative ultrasound (QUS), to assess low bone mass in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN).

METHODS

Two hundred seven young women (134 patients with AN and 73 healthy controls) with ages ranging from 14.4 to 38.4 years participated in this observational cross-sectional study. Bone mass was concomitantly evaluated by DXA to determine areal bone mineral density (aBMD; g/cm²) at hip, lumbar spine, and radius and by QUS to determine broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA; dB/MHz) at the heel.

RESULTS

BUA (66.5 ± 4.6 dB/MHz vs 61.0 ± 5.0 dB/MHz) and aBMD at the hip (0.916 ± 0.013 g/cm² vs 0.806 ± 0.010 g/cm²), lumbar spine (0.966 ± 0.012 g/cm² vs 0.886 ± 0.010 g/cm²), and radius (0.545 ± 0.005 g/cm² vs 0.526 ± 0.04 g/cm²) were significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in patients with AN compared with controls. When patient and control data were pooled, BUA was significantly correlated with aBMD at the hip (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), lumbar spine (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), and radius (r = 0.40, p<0.001). In patients with AN, BUA and aBMD were mainly and positively correlated with weight, lean tissue mass, body mass index (BMI), and minimal BMI life and negatively with the duration of both disease and amenorrhea. Better concordance between the two techniques was obtained when absolute BUA and aBMD values were used according to the WHO T score classification.

CONCLUSION

BUA measurement at the heel by QUS appears to be a pertinent nonionizing technique to assess low bone mass in patients with AN.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Bone complications of bariatric surgery: updates on sleeve gastrectomy, fractures, and interventions

Despite well recognized improvements in obesity-related comorbidities, increasing evidence implicates bariatric surgery in the onset of adverse skeletal health outcomes. The purpose of this review is to provide a focused update in three critical areas: (i) emergent data on sleeve gastrectomy and bone loss, (ii) evidence linking bariatric surgery to incident fracture, and (iii) intervention strategies designed to mitigate surgical bone loss. Better understanding of these issues will inform our treatment of skeletal health for patients planning bariatric surgery.