Systemic treatment for sarcoidosis was needed for 16% of 1810 Caucasian patients

Systemic treatment in sarcoidosis: Experience over two decades

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of systemic treatment in a cohort of sarcoidosis patients and identify presenting clinical features as predictive factors of the need for systemic immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 342 patients diagnosed and followed-up from January 1999 to December 2019 in a University Hospital in Northern Spain. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis was established according to ATS/ERS/WASOG criteria. A comparative analysis was performed between treated and untreated patients. Predictive factors of treatment prescription according to initial clinical manifestations were identified (multivariate analysis).

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 47.7±15.1 years, with a slight female predominance (51.8%) and Caucasian majority (94.2%). The main clinical manifestation was thoracic involvement (88.3%). Extrathoracic manifestations were detected in 68.4% cases, mainly cutaneous (34.2%), articular (27.8%) and ocular (17.8%). A total of 207 (60.5%) patients required systemic treatment. Glucocorticoid therapy was the most widely used (60.5%). Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in 25.4%, more frequently MTX (21.9%). Biologic therapy was prescribed in 12.9%, especially adalimumab (9.1%). Male gender (OR: 1.65; 95%CI: 1.06-2.56), intrathoracic (OR: 2.41; 95%CI: 1.22-4.76), ocular (OR: 4.14; 95%CI: 2.01-8.52), parotid (OR: 1.60; 95%CI: 1.39-1.94), neurological (OR: 5.00; 95%CI: 1.68-14.84), and renal (OR: 1.59; 95%CI: 1.38-1.94) involvement were identified as risk factors associated with the need of systemic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Most patients (60.5%) of sarcoidosis in our series required systemic therapy. An association between certain characteristics at initial presentation (male gender, lung, ocular, parotid, neurological and renal involvement) and the need of systemic treatment was identified.

Sarcoidosis-related mortality and the impact of corticosteroid treatment: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The aims of this national cohort study were: (1) to evaluate mortality in patients with sarcoidosis, stratified by gender, age and systemic corticosteroid (SC) treatment and (2) to characterize comorbidities in this cohort.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis from 2001 to 2015 were identified in the Danish National Patient Registry. Subgroup analyses were performed on cases treated/not treated with SCs within 3 years of the initial sarcoidosis diagnosis (as a proxy for disease severity). The Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to evaluate pre-diagnostic comorbidity. Cases were matched (1:4) with controls from the general population.

RESULTS

We identified 9795 cases with sarcoidosis. Mean age was 46.5 ± 15.9 years and 55% were male. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death was 1.48 (95% CI 1.31-1.68). Mortality was higher than for controls in all age groups and in both genders. HR for death for cases treated with SCs was 1.78 (95% CI 1.49-2.13) and, for cases receiving no treatment, 1.24 (95% CI 1.04-1.48). Sarcoidosis was the most commonly registered cause of death (13.3%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with sarcoidosis have an increased mortality compared with matched controls. Mortality is particularly high in patients treated with SCs.

Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review

Sarcoidosis is a multi-system disease of unknown etiology characterized by granuloma formation in various organs (especially lung and mediastinohilar lymph nodes). In more than half of patients, the disease resolves spontaneously. When indicated, it usually responds to corticosteroids, the first-line treatment, but some patients may not respond or tolerate them. An absence of treatment response is rare and urges for verifying the absence of a diagnosis error, the good adherence of the treatment, the presence of active lesions susceptible to respond since fibrotic lesions are irreversible. That is when second-line treatments, immunosuppressants (methotrexate, leflunomide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxychloroquine), should be considered. Methotrexate is the only first-line immunosuppressant validated by a randomized controlled trial. Refractory sarcoidosis is not yet a well-defined condition, but it remains a real challenge for the physicians. Herein, we considered refractory sarcoidosis as a disease in which second-line treatments are not sufficient to achieve satisfying disease control or satisfying corticosteroids tapering. Tumor necrosis alpha inhibitors, third-line treatments, have been validated through randomized controlled trials. There are currently no guidelines or recommendations regarding refractory sarcoidosis. Moreover, criteria defining non-response to treatment need to be clearly specified. The delay to achieve response to organ involvement and drugs also should be defined. In the past ten years, the efficacy of several immunosuppressants beforehand used in other autoimmune or inflammatory diseases was reported in refractory cases series. Among them, anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab), repository corticotrophin injection, and anti-JAK therapy anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody (tocilizumab) were the main reported. Unfortunately, no clinical trial is available to validate their use in the case of sarcoidosis. Currently, other immunosuppressants such as JAK inhibitors are on trial to assess their efficacy in sarcoidosis. In this review, we propose to summarize the state of the art regarding the use of immunosuppressants and their management in the case of refractory or multidrug-resistant sarcoidosis.

Renal sarcoidosis: approach to diagnosis and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to provide understanding of renal sarcoidosis, the different types of renal sarcoidosis, disease burden of renal involvement, and treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

The frequency of renal involvement seems to be underestimated, but renal sarcoidosis represents a relevant group of organ manifestations and significantly adds to the patient's morbidity. Because histopathological analysis of renal biopsy specimens can reveal various entities, a diagnostic workup is necessary in every patient with sarcoidosis.

SUMMARY

If systematically screened for renal manifestations are likely to occur in up to 25-30% of all sarcoidosis patients. The most common histological form of renal sarcoidosis is the granulomatous interstitial nephritis; however, granulomas can be absent. Furthermore, one can find various forms of secondary glomerulonephritis. In cases with dysregulated calcium homeostasis, nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis are commonly detectable kidney diseases. AA amyloidosis or renal masses because of granuloma formation are considered to be rare manifestations. In addition to glucocorticoids various immunosuppressive treatments such as tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors have proven to be effective based on case series.