1
|
Kosch TA, Torres-Sánchez M, Liedtke HC, Summers K, Yun MH, Crawford AJ, Maddock ST, Ahammed MS, Araújo VLN, Bertola LV, Bucciarelli GM, Carné A, Carneiro CM, Chan KO, Chen Y, Crottini A, da Silva JM, Denton RD, Dittrich C, Espregueira Themudo G, Farquharson KA, Forsdick NJ, Gilbert E, Che J, Katzenback BA, Kotharambath R, Levis NA, Márquez R, Mazepa G, Mulder KP, Müller H, O'Connell MJ, Orozco-terWengel P, Palomar G, Petzold A, Pfennig DW, Pfennig KS, Reichert MS, Robert J, Scherz MD, Siu-Ting K, Snead AA, Stöck M, Stuckert AMM, Stynoski JL, Tarvin RD, Wollenberg Valero KC. The Amphibian Genomics Consortium: advancing genomic and genetic resources for amphibian research and conservation. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:1025. [PMID: 39487448 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10899-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 11/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Amphibians represent a diverse group of tetrapods, marked by deep divergence times between their three systematic orders and families. Studying amphibian biology through the genomics lens increases our understanding of the features of this animal class and that of other terrestrial vertebrates. The need for amphibian genomic resources is more urgent than ever due to the increasing threats to this group. Amphibians are one of the most imperiled taxonomic groups, with approximately 41% of species threatened with extinction due to habitat loss, changes in land use patterns, disease, climate change, and their synergistic effects. Amphibian genomic resources have provided a better understanding of ontogenetic diversity, tissue regeneration, diverse life history and reproductive modes, anti-predator strategies, and resilience and adaptive responses. They also serve as essential models for studying broad genomic traits, such as evolutionary genome expansions and contractions, as they exhibit the widest range of genome sizes among all animal taxa and possess multiple mechanisms of genetic sex determination. Despite these features, genome sequencing of amphibians has significantly lagged behind that of other vertebrates, primarily due to the challenges of assembling their large, repeat-rich genomes and the relative lack of societal support. The emergence of long-read sequencing technologies, combined with advanced molecular and computational techniques that improve scaffolding and reduce computational workloads, is now making it possible to address some of these challenges. To promote and accelerate the production and use of amphibian genomics research through international coordination and collaboration, we launched the Amphibian Genomics Consortium (AGC, https://mvs.unimelb.edu.au/amphibian-genomics-consortium ) in early 2023. This burgeoning community already has more than 282 members from 41 countries. The AGC aims to leverage the diverse capabilities of its members to advance genomic resources for amphibians and bridge the implementation gap between biologists, bioinformaticians, and conservation practitioners. Here we evaluate the state of the field of amphibian genomics, highlight previous studies, present challenges to overcome, and call on the research and conservation communities to unite as part of the AGC to enable amphibian genomics research to "leap" to the next level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany A Kosch
- One Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
| | - María Torres-Sánchez
- Department of Biodiversity, Ecology, and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Kyle Summers
- Biology Department, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA
| | - Maximina H Yun
- CRTD/Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andrew J Crawford
- Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, 111711, Bogotá, Colombia
- Historia Natural C.J. Marinkelle, Universidad de los Andes, 111711, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Simon T Maddock
- School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Island Biodiversity and Conservation Centre, University of Seychelles, Anse Royale, Seychelles
| | | | - Victor L N Araújo
- Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, 111711, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Lorenzo V Bertola
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia
| | - Gary M Bucciarelli
- Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, USA
| | - Albert Carné
- Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Céline M Carneiro
- Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Kin O Chan
- University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute and Natural History Museum, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA
| | - Ying Chen
- Biology Department, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Angelica Crottini
- Centro de Investigação Em Biodiversidade E Recursos Genéticos, CIBIOInBIO Laboratório AssociadoUniversidade Do Porto, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, Via Madonna del Piano 6, Sesto Fiorentino, I-50019, Italy
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal
| | - Jessica M da Silva
- Evolutionary Genomics and Wildlife Management, Foundational Biodiversity Science, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Newlands, Cape Town, 7735, South Africa
- Centre for Evolutionary Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa
| | - Robert D Denton
- Department of Biology, Marian University, Indianapolis, IN, 46222, USA
| | - Carolin Dittrich
- Rojas Lab, Department of Life Science, Konrad-Lorenz-Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gonçalo Espregueira Themudo
- CIIMAR Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros Do Porto de Leixões Matosinhos, Avenida General Norton de Matos, Matosinhos, S/N, Portugal
| | - Katherine A Farquharson
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Edward Gilbert
- School of Natural Sciences, The University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
- Energy and Environment Institute, The University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
| | - Jing Che
- Key Laboratory of Genetic Evolution and Animal Models, and Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China
- Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw 05282, Myanmar
| | | | - Ramachandran Kotharambath
- Herpetology Lab, Dept. of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Tejaswini Hills, Kasaragod, Kerala, 671320, India
| | - Nicholas A Levis
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
| | - Roberto Márquez
- Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA
| | - Glib Mazepa
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Biophore, Switzerland
- Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology, , Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala, 75236, Sweden
| | - Kevin P Mulder
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wildlife Health Ghent, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Hendrik Müller
- Central Natural Science Collections, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), 06108, Germany
| | - Mary J O'Connell
- School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Gemma Palomar
- Department of Genetics, Physiology, and Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
| | - Alice Petzold
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht Str.24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany
| | - David W Pfennig
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Karin S Pfennig
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Michael S Reichert
- Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
| | - Jacques Robert
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Mark D Scherz
- Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Karen Siu-Ting
- School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
- Instituto Peruano de Herpetología, Ca. Augusto Salazar Bondy 136, Surco, Lima, Peru
- Herpetology Lab, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | - Anthony A Snead
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthias Stöck
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 301, 12587, Berlin, Germany
| | - Adam M M Stuckert
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA
| | | | - Rebecca D Tarvin
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kosch TA, Torres-Sánchez M, Liedtke HC, Summers K, Yun MH, Crawford AJ, Maddock ST, Ahammed MS, Araújo VLN, Bertola LV, Bucciarelli GM, Carné A, Carneiro CM, Chan KO, Chen Y, Crottini A, da Silva JM, Denton RD, Dittrich C, Themudo GE, Farquharson KA, Forsdick NJ, Gilbert E, Che J, Katzenback BA, Kotharambath R, Levis NA, Márquez R, Mazepa G, Mulder KP, Müller H, O’Connell MJ, Orozco-terWengel P, Palomar G, Petzold A, Pfennig DW, Pfennig KS, Reichert MS, Robert J, Scherz MD, Siu-Ting K, Snead AA, Stöck M, Stuckert AMM, Stynoski JL, Tarvin RD, Wollenberg Valero KC. The Amphibian Genomics Consortium: advancing genomic and genetic resources for amphibian research and conservation. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.06.27.601086. [PMID: 39005434 PMCID: PMC11244923 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.27.601086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
Amphibians represent a diverse group of tetrapods, marked by deep divergence times between their three systematic orders and families. Studying amphibian biology through the genomics lens increases our understanding of the features of this animal class and that of other terrestrial vertebrates. The need for amphibian genomic resources is more urgent than ever due to the increasing threats to this group. Amphibians are one of the most imperiled taxonomic groups, with approximately 41% of species threatened with extinction due to habitat loss, changes in land use patterns, disease, climate change, and their synergistic effects. Amphibian genomic resources have provided a better understanding of ontogenetic diversity, tissue regeneration, diverse life history and reproductive modes, antipredator strategies, and resilience and adaptive responses. They also serve as essential models for studying broad genomic traits, such as evolutionary genome expansions and contractions, as they exhibit the widest range of genome sizes among all animal taxa and possess multiple mechanisms of genetic sex determination. Despite these features, genome sequencing of amphibians has significantly lagged behind that of other vertebrates, primarily due to the challenges of assembling their large, repeat-rich genomes and the relative lack of societal support. The emergence of long-read sequencing technologies, combined with advanced molecular and computational techniques that improve scaffolding and reduce computational workloads, is now making it possible to address some of these challenges. To promote and accelerate the production and use of amphibian genomics research through international coordination and collaboration, we launched the Amphibian Genomics Consortium (AGC, https://mvs.unimelb.edu.au/amphibian-genomics-consortium) in early 2023. This burgeoning community already has more than 282 members from 41 countries. The AGC aims to leverage the diverse capabilities of its members to advance genomic resources for amphibians and bridge the implementation gap between biologists, bioinformaticians, and conservation practitioners. Here we evaluate the state of the field of amphibian genomics, highlight previous studies, present challenges to overcome, and call on the research and conservation communities to unite as part of the AGC to enable amphibian genomics research to "leap" to the next level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany A. Kosch
- One Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia
| | - María Torres-Sánchez
- Department of Biodiversity, Ecology, and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Kyle Summers
- Biology Department, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA 27858
| | - Maximina H. Yun
- Technische Universität Dresden, CRTD/Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andrew J. Crawford
- Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia
- Museo de Historia Natural C.J. Marinkelle, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia
| | - Simon T. Maddock
- School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Island Biodiversity and Conservation Centre, University of Seychelles, Anse Royale Seychelles
| | | | - Victor L. N. Araújo
- Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia
| | - Lorenzo V. Bertola
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia
| | - Gary M. Bucciarelli
- Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, USA
| | - Albert Carné
- Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Céline M. Carneiro
- Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Kin O. Chan
- University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute and Natural History Museum, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA
| | - Ying Chen
- Biology Department, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelica Crottini
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
- Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, rua do Campo Alegre s/n, 4169– 007 Porto, Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
| | - Jessica M. da Silva
- Evolutionary Genomics and Wildlife Management, Foundatonal Biodiversity Science, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Newlands 7735, Cape Town, South Africa
- Centre for Evolutionary Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Robert D. Denton
- Department of Biology, Marian University, Indianapolis, IN 46222, USA
| | - Carolin Dittrich
- Rojas Lab, Konrad-Lorenz-Institute of Ethology, Department of Life Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gonçalo Espregueira Themudo
- CIIMAR Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, Matosinhos, Portugal
| | - Katherine A. Farquharson
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Edward Gilbert
- School of Natural Sciences, The University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
- Energy and Environment Institute, The University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
| | - Jing Che
- Key Laboratory of Genetic Evolution and Animal Models, and Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China
- Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw 05282, Myanmar
| | | | - Ramachandran Kotharambath
- Herpetology Lab, Dept. of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Tejaswini Hills, Kasaragod, Kerala, 671320, India
| | - Nicholas A. Levis
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Roberto Márquez
- Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA
| | - Glib Mazepa
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore, 1015, Switzerland
- Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology, Norbyvägen 18D, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kevin P. Mulder
- Wildlife Health Ghent, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Hendrik Müller
- Central Natural Science Collections, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, D-06108 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Mary J. O’Connell
- School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pablo Orozco-terWengel
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Museum Avenue, CF10 3AX Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Palomar
- Department of Genetics, Physiology, and Microbiology; Faculty of Biological Sciences; Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
| | - Alice Petzold
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht Str.24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
| | - David W. Pfennig
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Karin S. Pfennig
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Michael S. Reichert
- Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK, USA
| | - Jacques Robert
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Mark D. Scherz
- Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Karen Siu-Ting
- School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
- Instituto Peruano de Herpetología, Ca. Augusto Salazar Bondy 136, Surco, Lima, Peru
- Herpetology Lab, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Matthias Stöck
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 301, D-12587 Berlin, Germany
| | - Adam M. M. Stuckert
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, 77204, USA
| | | | - Rebecca D. Tarvin
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lowe WH, Addis BR, Cochrane MM. Outbreeding reduces survival during metamorphosis in a headwater stream salamander. Mol Ecol 2024; 33:e17375. [PMID: 38699973 DOI: 10.1111/mec.17375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Assessing direct fitness effects of individual genetic diversity is challenging due to the intensive and long-term data needed to quantify survival and reproduction in the wild. But resolving these effects is necessary to determine how inbreeding and outbreeding influence eco-evolutionary processes. We used 8 years of capture-recapture data and single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes for 1906 individuals to test for effects of individual heterozygosity on stage-specific survival probabilities in the salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus. The life cycle of G. porphyriticus includes an aquatic larval stage followed by metamorphosis into a semi-aquatic adult stage. In our study populations, the larval stage lasts 6-10 years, metamorphosis takes several months, and lifespan can reach 20 years. Previous studies showed that metamorphosis is a sensitive life stage, leading us to predict that fitness effects of individual heterozygosity would occur during metamorphosis. Consistent with this prediction, monthly probability of survival during metamorphosis declined with multi-locus heterozygosity (MLH), from 0.38 at the lowest MLH (0.10) to 0.06 at the highest MLH (0.38), a reduction of 84%. Body condition of larvae also declined significantly with increasing MLH. These relationships were consistent in the three study streams. With evidence of localised inbreeding within streams, these results suggest that outbreeding disrupts adaptations in pre-metamorphic and metamorphic individuals to environmental gradients along streams, adding to evidence that headwater streams are hotspots of microgeographic adaptation. Our results also underscore the importance of incorporating life history in analyses of the fitness effects of individual genetic diversity and suggest that metamorphosis and similar discrete life stage transitions may be critical periods of viability selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winsor H Lowe
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA
| | - Brett R Addis
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA
| | - Madaline M Cochrane
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berger L, Skerratt LF, Kosch TA, Brannelly LA, Webb RJ, Waddle AW. Advances in Managing Chytridiomycosis for Australian Frogs: Gradarius Firmus Victoria. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2024; 12:113-133. [PMID: 38358840 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021122-100823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Extensive knowledge gains from research worldwide over the 25 years since the discovery of chytridiomycosis can be used for improved management. Strategies that have saved populations in the short term and/or enabled recovery include captive breeding, translocation into disease refugia, translocation from resistant populations, disease-free exclosures, and preservation of disease refuges with connectivity to previous habitat, while antifungal treatments have reduced mortality rates in the wild. Increasing host resistance is the goal of many strategies under development, including vaccination and targeted genetic interventions. Pathogen-directed strategies may be more challenging but would have broad applicability. While the search for the silver bullet solution continues, we should value targeted local interventions that stop extinction and buy time for evolution of resistance or development of novel solutions. As for most invasive species and infectious diseases, we need to accept that ongoing management is necessary. For species continuing to decline, proactive deployment and assessment of promising interventions are more valid than a hands-off, do-no-harm approach that will likely allow further extinctions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Berger
- One Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia; , , , ,
| | - Lee F Skerratt
- One Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia; , , , ,
| | - Tiffany A Kosch
- One Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia; , , , ,
| | - Laura A Brannelly
- One Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia; , , , ,
| | - Rebecca J Webb
- One Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia; , , , ,
| | - Anthony W Waddle
- One Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia; , , , ,
- Applied Biosciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rudin-Bitterli TS, Evans JP, Mitchell NJ. Fitness consequences of targeted gene flow to counter impacts of drying climates on terrestrial-breeding frogs. Commun Biol 2021; 4:1195. [PMID: 34663885 PMCID: PMC8523558 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02695-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeted gene flow (TGF) could bolster the adaptive potential of isolated populations threatened by climate change, but could also lead to outbreeding depression. Here, we explore these possibilities by creating mixed- and within-population crosses in a terrestrial-breeding frog species threatened by a drying climate. We reared embryos of the crawling frog (Pseudophryne guentheri) on wet and dry soils and quantified fitness-related traits upon hatching. TGF produced mixed outcomes in hybrids, which depended on crossing direction (origin of gametes from each sex). North-south crosses led to low embryonic survival if eggs were of a southern origin, and high malformation rates when eggs were from a northern population. Conversely, east-west crosses led to one instance of hybrid vigour, evident by increased fitness and desiccation tolerance of hybrid offspring relative to offspring produced from within-population crosses. These contrasting results highlight the need to experimentally evaluate the outcomes of TGF for focal species across generations prior to implementing management actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabitha S Rudin-Bitterli
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
- Centre for Evolutionary Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Jonathan P Evans
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
- Centre for Evolutionary Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Nicola J Mitchell
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reducing the Extinction Risk of Populations Threatened by Infectious Diseases. DIVERSITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/d13020063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Extinction risk is increasing for a range of species due to a variety of threats, including disease. Emerging infectious diseases can cause severe declines in wild animal populations, increasing population fragmentation and reducing gene flow. Small, isolated, host populations may lose adaptive potential and become more susceptible to extinction due to other threats. Management of the genetic consequences of disease-induced population decline is often necessary. Whilst disease threats need to be addressed, they can be difficult to mitigate. Actions implemented to conserve the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii), which has suffered decline to the deadly devil facial tumour disease (DFTD), exemplify how genetic management can be used to reduce extinction risk in populations threatened by disease. Supplementation is an emerging conservation technique that may benefit populations threatened by disease by enabling gene flow and conserving their adaptive potential through genetic restoration. Other candidate species may benefit from genetic management via supplementation but concerns regarding outbreeding depression may prevent widespread incorporation of this technique into wildlife disease management. However, existing knowledge can be used to identify populations that would benefit from supplementation where risk of outbreeding depression is low. For populations threatened by disease and, in situations where disease eradication is not an option, wildlife managers should consider genetic management to buffer the host species against inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity.
Collapse
|
7
|
Byrne PG, Keogh JS, O'Brien DM, Gaitan-Espitia JD, Silla AJ. Evidence that genetic compatibility underpins female mate choice in a monandrous amphibian. Evolution 2021; 75:529-541. [PMID: 33389749 DOI: 10.1111/evo.14160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Mate choice for genetic benefits remains controversial, largely because few studies have estimated the relative contributions of additive and non-additive sources of genetic variation to offspring fitness. Moreover, there remains a deficit of these estimates for species where female-mate preferences have been quantified in the wild, especially species characterized by monandry or monogamy. Here, we use artificial fertilization techniques combined with a cross-classified breeding design to simultaneously test for "good genes" and "compatible genes" benefits of mate choice in the monandrous red backed toadlet (Pseudophryne coriacea). In addition, we used a genomic approach to estimate effects of parental-genetic relatedness (assessed using 27, 768 single nucleotide polymorphisms) on offspring fitness. Our results revealed no significant additive genetic effects (sire effects), but highly significant non-additive genetic effects (sire × dam interaction effects), on fertilization success, survival during embryonic development, and hatching success. We also found significant associations between parental genetic similarity and offspring survival (whereby survival was higher when parents were more related), and significant positive relationships between fertilization success and embryo survival through to hatching. These results indicate that offspring viability is significantly influenced by the genetic compatibility of parental genotypes, that more related parents are more genetically compatible, and that gametes with greater compatibility at fertilization produce more viable offspring. More broadly, our findings provide new quantitative genetic evidence that genetic incompatibility underpins female mate preferences. Continued quantitative genetic assessment of the relative importance of good genes versus compatible genes is needed to ascertain the general importance of genetic benefits as a driver of female mate choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip G Byrne
- School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J Scott Keogh
- Ecology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Daniel M O'Brien
- School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juan Diego Gaitan-Espitia
- The Swire Institute of Marine Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Aimee J Silla
- School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Silla AJ, Roberts JD, Byrne PG. The effect of injection and topical application of hCG and GnRH agonist to induce sperm-release in the roseate frog, Geocrinia rosea. CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY 2020; 8:coaa104. [PMID: 33304589 PMCID: PMC7720084 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coaa104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Reproductive technologies may assist amphibian conservation breeding programs (CBPs) to achieve propagation targets and genetic management goals. However, a trial-and-error approach to protocol refinement has led to few amphibian CBPs routinely employing reproductive technologies with predictable outcomes. Additionally, while injections can be safely administered to amphibians, perceived animal welfare risks, such as injury and disease transmission, warrant the development of alternative hormone administration protocols. The present study investigated the spermiation response of roseate frogs, Geocrinia rosea, administered various doses of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) via subcutaneous injection. This study also quantified the spermiation response of frogs administered both hormones via topical application. Total sperm, sperm concentration and sperm viability were assessed over a 12-h period post hormone administration. Males released sperm in response to the injection of hCG (88-100% response; 5, 10 or 20 IU), but all samples collected from males administered hCG topically (100, 100 + DMSO or 200 IU hCG) were aspermic. In contrast, males consistently released sperm in response to both the injection (100% response; 1, 5 or 10 μg), or topical application (80-100% response; 50, 50 + DMSO or 100 μg) of GnRH-a. Overall, the administration of GnRH-a was more effective at inducing spermiation than hCG. Mean total sperm and sperm concentration were highest in response to the optimal topically applied dose of 100 μg GnRH-a (mean total sperm = 2.44 × 103, sperm concentration = 1.48 × 105 sperm/ml). We provide novel evidence that topical application provides a viable alternative to injection for the administration of GnRH-a to induce spermiation in amphibians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee J Silla
- School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Northfields Ave, NSW 2522, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences and Centre for Evolutionary Biology, University of Western Australia, Stirling Highway, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
- Corresponding author: School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Northfields Ave, NSW 2522, Australia.
| | - J Dale Roberts
- School of Biological Sciences and Centre for Evolutionary Biology, University of Western Australia, Stirling Highway, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Phillip G Byrne
- School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Northfields Ave, NSW 2522, Australia
| |
Collapse
|