1
|
Wilcox AAE, Provencher JF, Henri DA, Alexander SM, Taylor JJ, Cooke SJ, Thomas PJ, Johnson LR. Braiding Indigenous knowledge systems and Western-based sciences in the Alberta oil sands region: A systematic review. Facets (Ott) 2023. [DOI: 10.1139/facets-2022-0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The braiding of Indigenous knowledge systems and Western-based sciences offers insights into ecology and has emerged as a way to help address complex environmental issues. We reviewed the publicly available ecological research involving the braiding of Indigenous knowledge systems and Western-based sciences to support collaborative work in the Alberta oil sands region of Canada. We conducted a systematic review, coding for 78 questions in six categories: (1) literature search and bibliographic information; (2) research themes; (3) study setting and design; (4) knowledge systems; (5) power relationships, colonization, and ethical considerations in research; and (6) benefits and challenges of braiding. We identified six articles that braided knowledge, with those articles focusing on environmental management and monitoring for impacts of industrial activity in northern Alberta. Researchers used a broad range of approaches to gather Indigenous knowledge and scientific data and identified multiple challenges (e.g., asymmetries of power, resource availability, and funding) to research. Our findings show that more support is needed to foster, promote, and disseminate interdisciplinary collaborative work involving braiding. Additional support is also required to address Indigenous community research needs related to the assessment of environmental impact and reclamation, as well as the understanding of ecological threats across the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana A. E. Wilcox
- Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Jennifer F. Provencher
- Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Dominique A. Henri
- Wildlife Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montreal, QC H2Y 2E7, Canada
| | - Steven M. Alexander
- Environment and Biodiversity Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ottawa, ON K2P 2J8, Canada
- Environmental Change and Governance Group, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Jessica J. Taylor
- Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Institute of Environmental Sciences and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
- Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Steven J. Cooke
- Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Institute of Environmental Sciences and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
- Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Philippe J. Thomas
- Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Lydia R. Johnson
- School of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rigal C, Wagner S, Nguyen MP, Jassogne L, Vaast P. ShadeTreeAdvice
methodology: Guiding tree‐species selection using local knowledge. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Rigal
- CIRAD UMR ABSYS Montpellier France
- ABSYS Université Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Supagro Montpellier France
- ICRAF, Vietnam Office Hanoi Vietnam
| | - Sigrun Wagner
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| | | | | | - Philippe Vaast
- ICRAF, Vietnam Office Hanoi Vietnam
- CIRAD UMR Eco&Sols Université Montpellier Montpellier France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tree Advisor: A Novel Woody Plant Selection Tool to Support Multifunctional Objectives. LAND 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/land11030397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Purposefully planted trees and shrubs can provide multiple benefits when appropriately planned and designed. Tools to help select species that will function more effectively than other species for ecosystem services, production, and aesthetic purposes are generally lacking. To address this challenge, we developed an interactive plant selection tool entitled Tree Advisor that rates woody species for a wide range of different purposes based on plant attributes. In this prototype decision support tool, 90 species of trees and shrubs are rated for 14 different purposes in the northern and central Great Plains region of the United States. A rating algorithm was developed based on the scientific literature regarding plant functions and related attributes that determine relative performance of a species for each purpose. User input and best practices for developing effective decision support tools informed the tool development process. Based on user feedback, the tool supports multifunctional planning and enables a user to quickly develop a short list of the better species to use which can then be refined by the user based on suitability under local site conditions, commercial availability, and availability of locally adapted cultivars and hybrids. This tool development approach can serve as a model for producing multifunctional woody plant selection tools for other ecoregions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hastings Z, Wong M, Ticktin T. Who Gets to Adopt? Contested Values Constrain Just Transitions to Agroforestry. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.727579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Agroforestry is often promoted as a multi-benefit solution to increasing the resilience of agricultural landscapes. Yet, there are many obstacles to transitioning agricultural production systems to agroforestry. Research on agroforestry transitions often focuses on why farmers and land managers chose to adopt this type of stewardship, with less focus on the political context of practitioner decisions. We use the case study of agroforestry in Hawai‘i to explore how agroforestry transitions occur with particular attention to politics and power dynamics. Specifically, we ask, what factors drive and/or restrain transitions to agroforestry and who is able to participate. We interviewed 38 agroforestry practitioners in Hawai‘i and analyzed the data using constructivist grounded theory. We then held a focus group discussion with interview participants to share results and discuss solutions. Practitioners primarily chose agroforestry intentionally for non-economic and values-based reasons, rather than as a means to production or economic goals. Agroforestry practitioners face a similar suite of structural obstacles as other agricultural producers, including access to land, labor, and capital and ecological obstacles like invasive species and climate change. However, the conflict in values between practitioners and dominant institutions manifests as four additional dimensions of obstacles constraining agroforestry transitions: systems for accessing land, capital, and markets favor short-term production and economic value; Indigenous and local knowledge is not adequately valued; regulatory, funding, and other support institutions are siloed; and not enough appropriate information is accessible. Who is able to practice despite these obstacles is tightly linked with people's ability to access off-site resources that are inequitably distributed. Our case study highlights three key points with important implications for realizing just agroforestry transitions: (1) practitioners transition to agroforestry to restore ecosystems and reclaim sovereignty, not just for the direct benefits; (2) a major constraint to agroforestry transitions is that the term agroforestry is both unifying and exclusionary; (3) structural change is needed for agroforestry transitions to be just. We discuss potential solutions in the context of Hawai‘i and provide transferrable principles and actionable strategies for achieving equity in agroforestry transitions. We also demonstrate a transferrable approach for action-oriented, interdisciplinary research in support of just agroforestry transitions.
Collapse
|