Graft macrosteatosis and time of T-tube removal as risk factors for biliary strictures after liver transplantation

Ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion prevents ischemic cholangiopathy after liver transplantation: A meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver transplantation (LT) is the gold standard for end-stage liver disease, but ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) remains a significant complication. Ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion (ESNMP) has emerged as a potential strategy to mitigate ischemic injury. However, the effect of ESNMP on reducing post-LT IC remains controversial. This study aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of ESNMP on IC incidence.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The literature search included studies from 2015 to 2025 comparing LT outcomes using ESNMP vs. static cold storage (SCS). The primary outcome was the incidence of IC. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool. Statistical analysis, including random-effects meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression, was performed to evaluate heterogeneity, potential confounders, and the impact of follow-up duration.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies, including 76,045 patients (4843 ESNMP; 71,202 SCS), were analyzed. No statistically significant difference in IC incidence was found between ESNMP and SCS (1.3 % vs. 0.6 %; RR = 0.68, 95 %CI = 0.41-1.13; P = 0.14). Sensitivity analysis excluding one outlier study revealed a reduction in IC risk with ESNMP (RR = 0.62, 95 %CI = 0.38-1.01; P = 0.054). Two sub-analyses of studies with ≥12 months of follow-up (RR = 0.51, 95 %CI = 0.26-0.99; P = 0.049) and DCDs (RR = 0.33, 95 %CI = 0.16-0.67; P = 0.002) showed risk reduction. The meta-regression revealed that the back-to-base perfusion approach was associated with the occurrence of IC, with an OR of 1.03 (95 %CI = 1.00-1.07, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

a correlation between ESNMP use and IC reduced risk appears to exist, especially with longer follow-up periods and DCDs, though more high-quality studies are needed to confirm this finding.

The use of the T-tube in biliary tract reconstruction during orthotopic liver transplantation: An umbrella review

Biliary complications are one of the main concerns after liver transplantation, and to avoid these, the use of a T-tube has been advocated in biliary reconstruction. Most liver transplantation centres perform a biliary anastomosis without a T-tube to avoid the risk of complications and T-tube-related costs. Several meta-analyses have reached discordant conclusions regarding the benefits of using the T-tube. An umbrella review was performed to summarise quantitative measures about overall biliary complications, biliary leaks, biliary strictures and cholangitis associated with the T-tube use after liver transplantation. Published systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the use of T-Tube in liver transplantation were searched and analysed. From the comprehensive literature search from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases on the 25th of October 2021, 104 records were retrieved. Seven meta-analyses and two systematic reviews were included in the final analysis. All the meta-analyses of RCT stated no differences in overall biliary complications and biliary leaks when using T-tube for a liver transplant (I2 ≥ 90% and I2 range 0-76%, respectively). The meta-analysis of the RCTs evaluating the risks of biliary strictures after liver transplantation showed that T-tube protects from the complication (I2 range 0-80%). Biliary anastomosis without a T-tube has equivalent overall biliary complications and bile leaks compared to the T-tube reconstruction. The incidence of biliary strictures is attenuated in patients with T-tubes, and most meta-analyses of RCTs have very low heterogeneity. Therefore, the present umbrella review suggests a selective T-tube use, particularly in small biliary ducts or transplants with marginal grafts at high risk of post-LT strictures.

Pediatric T-tube in adult liver transplantation: Technical refinements of insertion and removal

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of extended-criteria donor organs, the interest around T-tubes in liver transplantation (LT) was restored whilst concerns regarding T-tube-related complications persist.

AIM

To describe insertion and removal protocols implemented at our institution to safely use pediatric rubber 5-French T-tubes and subsequent outcomes in a consecutive series of adult patients.

METHODS

Data of consecutive adult LT patients from brain-dead donors, treated from March 2017 to December 2019, were collected (i.e., biliary complications, adverse events, treatment after T-Tube removal). Patients with upfront hepatico-jejunostomy, endoscopically removed T-tubes, those who died or received retransplantation before T-tube removal were excluded.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included in this study; T-tubes were removed 158 d (median; IQR 128-206 d) after LT. In four (5.6%) patients accidental T-tube removal occurred requiring monitoring only; in 68 (94.4%) patients Nelaton drain insertion was performed according to our protocol, resulting in 18 (25%) patients with a biliary output, subsequently removed after 2 d (median; IQR 1-4 d). Three (4%) patients required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) due to persistent Nelaton drain output. Three (4%) patients developed suspected biliary peritonitis, requiring ERCP with sphincterotomy and nasobiliary drain insertion (only one revealing contrast extravasation); no patient required percutaneous drainage or emergency surgery.

CONCLUSION

The use of pediatric rubber 5-French T-tubes in LT proved safe in our series after insertion and removal procedure refinements.

An Italian survey on the use of T-tube in liver transplantation: old habits die hard!

There is enough clinical evidence that a T-tube use in biliary reconstruction at adult liver transplantation (LT) does not significantly modify the risk of biliary stricture/leak, and it may even sustain infective and metabolic complications. Thus, the policy on T-tube use has been globally changing, with progressive application of more restrictive selection criteria. However, there are no currently standardized indications in such change, and many LT Centers rely only on own experience and routine. A nation-wide survey was conducted among all the 20 Italian adult LT Centers to investigate the current policy on T-tube use. It was found that 20% of Centers completely discontinued the T-tube use, while 25% Centers used it routinely in all LT cases. The remaining 55% of Centers applied a selective policy, based on criteria of technical complexity of biliary reconstruction (72.7%), followed by low-quality graft (63.6%) and high-risk recipient (36.4%). A T-tube use > 50% of annual caseload was not associated with high-volume Center status (> 70 LT per year), an active pediatric or living-donor transplant program, or use of DCD grafts. Only 10/20 (50%) Centers identified T-tube as a potential risk factor for complications other than biliary stricture/leak. In these cases, the suspected pathogenic mechanism comprised bacterial colonization (70%), malabsorption (70%), interruption of the entero-hepatic bile-acid cycle (50%), biliary inflammation due to an indwelling catheter (40%) and gut microbiota changes (40%). In conclusion, the prevalence of T-tube use among the Italian LT Centers is still relatively high, compared to the European trend (33%), and the potential detrimental effect of T-tube, beyond biliary stricture/leak, seems to be somehow underestimated.

Anastomotic bilio-biliary stricture after adult liver transplantation: A retrospective study over 20 years in a single center

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications are the main surgical complication after liver transplantation (LT). The aims of the present retrospective single center study were to describe anastomotic bilio-biliary strictures (ABS) in a large cohort of liver transplant recipients with long follow-up.

METHODS

All adult LT recipients who underwent a LT, with bilio-biliary anastomosis, between 1990 and 2010 in Edouard Herriot hospital, Lyon, France were included in the study.

RESULTS

The study population consisted in 783 patients (70.0% males), median age 50.5 years; main indication was alcohol-related liver disease (46.8%). The median follow-up after LT was 11.9 years (range 0-27 years). The overall incidence of anastomotic biliary complications was 9.7%: 50 patients developed an ABS (6.6%), after a median delay of 4.4 months (range 0.1-245.2) after LT and 32 (4.1%) developed biliary leakage after a median delay of 25 days (range 1-179). The actuarial risk of developing an ABS was 1.6% at 1-month, 2.7% at 3-months, 4.1% at 6-months, and 5.1%, 6.0%, 6.4%, 6.6%, 7.3% at 1-, 2-, 5-, 10- and 15-years, respectively. Univariate analysis disclosed that post-reperfusion syndrome and liver graft steatosis (≥30%) were significant risk factors for ABS. Multivariate analysis disclosed that graft steatosis (OR=6.262, 95%CI 1.936-20.257, P=0.002) and MELD score (OR=1.071, 95%CI 1.018-1.128, P=0.008) were significant risk factors for ABS. The first-line treatment of ABS consisted in endoscopic stenting for 44 patients (88.0%) and immediate success rate was 75.0%. Delayed recurrence of ABS occurred in 8/33 patients (24.0%).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that steatotic grafts should be used for recipients without severe liver failure to avoid ABS, and that endoscopic stenting of post-LT ABS leads to a high success rate, but is associated with a significant risk of recurrence.

Use of machine perfusion in livers showing steatosis prior to transplantation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The role of machine perfusion (MP) in the evaluation of liver grafts with macrovesicular steatosis (MaS) remains ill-defined as only a limited number of studies has been reported. The objective of the current study was to provide a systematic review to evaluate the role of MP in the setting of MaS livers.

METHODS

A systematic review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. Eligible articles published up to April 2019 were included using the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases.

RESULTS

Among the 422 articles screened, only 16 papers met the inclusion criteria. A total of 54 cases of MP use before liver transplantation were included. Sixteen (29.6%) grafts were from donors after circulatory death. In 22 (40.7%) cases, hypothermic machine perfusion was performed. Normothermic machine perfusion was done in the remaining 32 (59.3%) cases. According to the histological results of the donor core biopsy, a MaS value < 30% was observed in 41 (75.9%) cases, whereas 13 (24.1%) patients had moderate-to-severe (≥ 30%) MaS. Following categorization of the pooled population according to the presence of moderate-to-severe (≥ 30%) MaS in the donor graft, no differences were noted in terms of post-transplant death or severe complications following MP. There was no correlation between the proportion of MaS in the donor graft relative to post-transplant peak ALT among patients treated with MP. Among the entire pooled cohort, there was also no correlation between MaS values and ALT peak (R = 0.13; P = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

MP appears to be feasible and safe in MaS livers. Experience to date has been very limited, and the benefit of MP remains not determined. Prospective studies will need to define better the potential effect of "defatting" drugs used during the perfusion process on MaS.

Assessment of Anastomotic Biliary Complications in Adult Patients Undergoing High-Acuity Liver Transplant

Importance

Anastomotic biliary complications (ABCs) constitute the most common technical complications in liver transplant (LT). Given the ever-increasing acuity of LT, identification of factors contributing to ABCs is essential to minimize morbidity and optimize outcomes. A detailed analysis in a patient population undergoing high-acuity LT is lacking.

Objective

To evaluate the rate of, risk factors for, and outcomes of ABCs and acuity level in LT recipients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included adult LT recipients from January 1, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at a single large urban transplant center. Patients were followed up for at least 12 months after LT until June 30, 2017. Of 520 consecutive adult patients undergoing LT, 509 LTs in 503 patients were included. Data were analyzed from May 1 through September 13, 2017.

Exposure

Liver transplant.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Any complications occurring at the level of the biliary reconstruction.

Results

Among the 503 transplant recipients undergoing 509 LTs included in the analysis (62.3% male; median age, 58 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 50-63 years), median follow-up was 24 months (IQR, 16-34 months). Overall patient and graft survival at 1 year were 91.1% and 90.3%, respectively. The median Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 35 (IQR, 15-40) for the entire cohort. T tubes were used in 199 LTs (39.1%) during initial bile duct reconstruction. Overall incidence of ABCs included 103 LTs (20.2%). Anastomotic leak occurred in 25 LTs (4.9%) and stricture, 77 (15.1%). Exit-site leak in T tubes occurred in 36 (7.1%) and T tube obstruction in 16 (3.1%). Seventeen patients with ABCs required surgical revision of bile duct reconstruction. Multivariate analysis revealed the following 7 independent risk factors for ABCs: recipient hepatic artery thrombosis (odds ratio [OR], 12.41; 95% CI, 2.37-64.87; P = .003), second LT (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.13-14.50; P = .03), recipient hepatic artery stenosis (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.30-11.17; P = .02), donor hypertension (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.27-6.11; P = .01), recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.23-5.74; P = .01), donor death due to anoxia (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.13-6.03; P = .03), and use of nonabsorbable suture material for biliary reconstruction (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.09-5.54; P = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance

This large, single-center series identified physiologic and anatomical independent risk factors contributing to ABCs after high-acuity LT. Careful consideration of these factors could guide perioperative management and mitigate potentially preventable ABCs.

Use of Elderly Donors in Liver Transplantation: A Paired-match Analysis at a Single Center

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of elderly donors in liver transplantation (LT) and identify risk factors associated with a worse outcome.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Use of livers from very old donors could expand the donor pool but is not universally implemented.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center medical record review. From January 2001 to December 2014, 1354 LTs were performed. After exclusion of donors <18 years, ABO-incompatible LT, re-LT and UNOS 1 status patients, LT recipients were stratified into 2 groups based on donor age: 18-69 (n=692) vs. ≥70 years (n=515) then matched using a propensity score approach. Two groups were finally matched (young group = 448 cases; old group = 515 cases).

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 5.0 (2.0-8.4) years. Comparing the 2 identified groups, no differences were observed regarding early retransplants (1.8 vs. 2.9; P = 0.3), HCV-related death (7.6 vs. 8.7%; P = 0.6), vascular (5.8 vs. 5.0%; P = 0.7), and biliary complications (16.5 vs. 18.6%; P = 0.4). On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for graft loss were: HCV-positive recipient (HR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.6-2.7; P < 0.001), donor age (HR = 1.0; 95% CI = 1.0-1.0; P < 0.001), cold ischemia time (HR = 1.0; 95% CI = 1.0-1.0; P = 0.042), and donor history of diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.03-2.13; P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of elderly donors is not associated per se with an increased risk of vascular and biliary complications. In the presence of cold ischemia time and diabetes mellitus, appropriate donor-to-recipient matching is warranted.

Ischemic Damage Represents the Main Risk Factor for Biliary Stricture After Liver Transplantation: A Follow-Up Study in a Danish Population

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications (BC) are frequently observed following liver transplantation. The aim of the present retrospective study, conducted at an outpatients' tertiary care hospital, was to determine the incidence of biliary complications and risk factors associated with their development in liver transplantation (lT) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records were reviewed for all patients who underwent liver transplantation at the Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, from 2000 to 2011 and were referred to the Aarhus University Hospital for follow-up. Patients who died within 3 months of surgery or had incomplete clinical information were excluded. All data for demographic characteristics and possible risk factors for development of biliary stricture were collected. Fifty-one patients were included.

RESULTS

The median age at transplantation was 40 (range=7-64) years, and 53% of patients were males. Biliary complications occurred in 18 patients (35%), the majority of whom developed strictures (12 patients, 24%). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that cytomegalovirus infection (p=0.008), hepatic artery obstruction (p=0.03) and hepatic artery graft abnormalities (p=0.03) were independent risk factors for the development of biliary strictures.

CONCLUSION

One-third of patients presented biliary complications after liver transplantation, among which biliary strictures were the most common. Cytomegalovirus infection, hepatic artery stenosis and anatomical abnormality of the graft's hepatic artery are independent risk factors for the development of biliary stricture.

Role of perfusion machines in the setting of clinical liver transplantation: A qualitative systematic review

Growing enthusiasm around machine perfusion (MP) in clinical liver transplantation (LT) may be the preamble for standardized practice to expand the donors' pool. The present systematic review investigated all the liver transplantations performed using grafts treated with MP. A systematic review of 309 papers was performed. Eventually, 27 articles were enrolled for the study. A total number of 173 cases were reported. Only 12 cohort studies were identified: the remaining ones were case reports or case series. Hypothermic machine perfusion was performed in 102 (59.0%), normothermic machine perfusion in 65 (37.6%), and controlled oxygenated rewarming in the remaining 6 (3.4%) cases. Donor characteristics, evaluation of graft quality, and endpoints were not homogeneous among the studies. Overall, post-LT results were excellent, with 1.2 and 4.0% of patients experienced primary non-function and ischemic-type biliary lesions, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Until now, no study exists that addresses the role of MP in selecting liver grafts available for LT. All the published studies mainly focused on the feasibility and safety of this new technology. Further research investigating the selection process of marginal donors is required.

Post-transplant cholangiopathy: Classification, pathogenesis, and preventive strategies

Biliary complications are the most frequent cause of morbidity, re-transplantation, and even mortality after liver transplantation. In general, biliary leakage and anastomotic and non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) can be recognized. There is no consensus on the exact definition of NAS and different names and criteria have been used in literature. We propose to use the term post-transplant cholangiopathy for the spectrum of abnormalities of large donor bile ducts, that includes NAS, but also intraductal casts and intrahepatic biloma formation, in the presence of a patent hepatic artery. Combinations of these manifestations of cholangiopathy are not infrequently found in the same liver and ischemia-reperfusion injury is generally considered the common underlying mechanism. Other factors that contribute to post-transplant cholangiopathy are biliary injury due to bile salt toxicity and immune-mediated injury. This review provides an overview of the various types of post-transplant cholangiopathy, the presumed pathogenesis, clinical implications, and preventive strategies.

Extended criteria donors in liver transplantation Part I: reviewing the impact of determining factors

The definition and factors of extended criteria donors have already been set; however, details of the various opinions still differ in many respects. In this review, we summarize the impact of these factors and their clinical relevance. Elderly livers must not be allocated for hepatitis C virus (HCV) positives, or patients with acute liver failure. In cases of markedly increased serum transaminases, donor hemodynamics is an essential consideration. A prolonged hypotension of the donor does not always lead to an increase in post-transplantation graft loss if post-OLT care is proper. Hypernatremia of less than 160 mEq/L is not an absolute contraindication to accept a liver graft per se. The presence of steatosis is an independent and determinant risk factor for the outcome. The gold standard of the diagnosis is the biopsy. This is recommended in all doubtful cases. The use of HCV+ grafts for HCV+ recipients is comparable in outcome. The leading risk factor for HCV recurrence is the actual RNA positivity of the donor. The presence of a proper anti-HBs level seems to protect from de novo HBV infection. A favourable outcome can be expected if a donation after cardiac death liver is transplanted in a favourable condition, meaning, a warm ischemia time < 30 minutes, cold ischemia time < 8-10 hours, and donor age 50-60 years. The pathway of organ quality assessment is to obtain the most relevant information (e.g. biopsy), consider the co-existing donor risk factors and the reserve capacity of the recipient, and avoid further technical issues.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation

Biliary complications (BCs) remain one of the most outstanding factors influencing long-term results after orthotopic liver transplantation. The authors carried out a systematic overview of 1720 papers since 2008, and focused on 45 relevant ones. Among 14,411 transplanted patients the incidence of BCs was 23%. Biliary leakage occurred in 8.5%, biliary stricture in 14.7%, mortality rate was 1-3%.

RISK FACTORS

preoperative sodium level; p = 0.037, model of end-stage liver disease score >25; p = 0.048, primary sclerosing cholangitis; p = 0.001, malignancy; p = 0.026, donor age >60, macrovesicular graft steatosis; p = 0.001, duct-to-duct anastomosis; p = 0.004, long anhepatic phase; p = 0.04, cold ischemic time >12 h; p = 0.043, use of T-tube; p = 0.032, insufficient flush of bile ducts; p = 0.001, acute rejection; p = 0.003, cytomegalovirus infection; p = 0.004 and hepatic artery thrombosis; p = 0.001. The management was surgical in case of biliary leakage, and interventional radiology or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in case of biliary stricture. Mapping of miRNA profile is a new field of research. Nemes-Doros score is a useful tool in the estimation of hepatic artery thrombosis. Management of BCs requires a multidisciplinary expert team.