Safety and tolerability of high-intensity statin therapy in heart transplant patients receiving immunosuppression with tacrolimus

Prevention and rehabilitation after heart transplantation: A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Heart Failure Association of the ESC, and the European Cardio Thoracic Transplant Association, a section of ESOT

Little is known either about either physical activity patterns, or other lifestyle-related prevention measures in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. The history of HTx started more than 50 years ago but there are still no guidelines or position papers highlighting the features of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx. The aims of this scientific statement are (i) to explain the importance of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx, and (ii) to promote the factors (modifiable/non-modifiable) that should be addressed after HTx to improve patients' physical capacity, quality of life and survival. All HTx team members have their role to play in the care of these patients and multidisciplinary prevention and rehabilitation programmes designed for transplant recipients. HTx recipients are clearly not healthy disease-free subjects yet they also significantly differ from heart failure patients or those who are supported with mechanical circulatory support. Therefore, prevention and rehabilitation after HTx both need to be specifically tailored to this patient population and be multidisciplinary in nature. Prevention and rehabilitation programmes should be initiated early after HTx and continued during the entire post-transplant journey. This clinical consensus.

Recent advances in biological pumps as a building block for bioartificial hearts

The field of biological pumps is a subset of cardiac tissue engineering and focused on the development of tubular grafts that are designed generate intraluminal pressure. In the simplest embodiment, biological pumps are tubular grafts with contractile cardiomyocytes on the external surface. The rationale for biological pumps is a transition from planar 3D cardiac patches to functional biological pumps, on the way to complete bioartificial hearts. Biological pumps also have applications as a standalone device, for example, to support the Fontan circulation in pediatric patients. In recent years, there has been a lot of progress in the field of biological pumps, with innovative fabrication technologies. Examples include the use of cell sheet engineering, self-organized heart muscle, bioprinting and in vivo bio chambers for vascularization. Several materials have been tested for biological pumps and included resected aortic segments from rodents, type I collagen, and fibrin hydrogel, to name a few. Multiple bioreactors have been tested to condition biological pumps and replicate the complex in vivo environment during controlled in vitro culture. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the field of the biological pumps, outlining progress in the field over the past several years. In particular, different fabrication methods, biomaterial platforms for tubular grafts and examples of bioreactors will be presented. In addition, we present an overview of some of the challenges that need to be overcome for the field of biological pumps to move forward.

A systematic review of the drug-drug interaction between statins and colchicine: Patient characteristics, etiologies, and clinical management strategies

Colchicine and statins are frequently co-prescribed for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, auto-inflammatory diseases, and gout. Both are substrates and inhibitors of the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 isozyme and P-glycoprotein so that taken together, they represent a clinically significant interaction. Data suggest the interaction may be associated with potentially life-threatening myopathies and rhabdomyolysis. The purposes of this systematic review (SR) were to gather and appraise evidence surrounding the statin-colchicine drug interaction and discuss related risk-mitigation strategies. An electronic literature search was performed. Twenty-one articles met the protocol to be included in the qualitative analysis: 18 case reports/series, 2 retrospective observational cohort studies, and 1 retrospective case-control study. Thirty-eight patients developed an adverse drug event (ADE) receiving statin-colchicine combination therapy; 25 (66%) patients developed myopathy; 10 (26%) patients developed rhabdomyolysis, and three (8%) patients developed neuromyopathy. Over 70% of patients developed ADEs on simvastatin or atorvastatin, and 80% of studies reported moderate-to-high intensity statins. Colchicine dosing varied but ranged between 0.5 to 1.5 mg daily. Sixty-two percent of patients in the case reports/series had comorbid renal disease. Seven studies (33% of all included studies) reported patients taking concomitant interacting medications at the CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein efflux pump. Seventeen studies (81% of all included studies) reported ADEs leading to hospitalization. A multivariate analysis from one case-control study identified risk factors prognosticating myopathy ADEs in patients taking statin-colchicine therapy: comorbid renal disease and/or cirrhosis, colchicine doses 1.2 mg daily or greater, and concomitant interacting medications. Clinicians must be cognizant that the statin-colchicine drug interaction may lead to patient harm and thus should employ risk-mitigation strategies for statin-associated muscle symptoms. Future studies are warranted to validate clinically relevant risk factors that are strongly associated with the complications owing to the statin-colchicine drug interaction.

Effect of Statin Intensity on the Progression of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Background: In the non-transplant population, hyperlipidaemia has shifted from targeting LDL goals to statin intensity-based treatment. It is unknown whether this strategy is also beneficial in cardiac transplantation. Methods: This single-centre retrospective study evaluated the effect of statin use and intensity on time to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after cardiac transplantation. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression survival methods were used to assess the association of statin intensity and median post-transplant LDL on CAV-free survival. Results: The study involved 143 adults (71% men, average follow-up of 25 ± 14 months) who underwent transplant between 2013 and 2017. Mean CAV-free survival was 47.5 months (95% CI [43.1–51.8]), with 29 patients having CAV grade 1 or greater. Median LDL was not associated with time to CAV (p=0.790). CAV-free survival did not differ between intensity groups (p=0.435). Conclusion: Given the non-statistically significant difference in time to CAV with higher intensity statins, the data suggest that advancing moderate- or high-intensity statin after cardiac transplantation may not provide additional long-term clinical benefit. Trial registration: Not applicable.

Metabolic Complications in Liver Transplantation Recipients: How We Can Optimize Long-Term Survival

Liver transplantation (LT) recipients have experienced a significant improvement in short-term survival during the past 3 decades attributed to advancements in surgical techniques, perioperative management, and effective immunosuppressive regimens. However, long-term survival is affected by a high incidence of metabolic disorders and their consequences, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and malignancies. Pretransplant metabolic impairments especially in those with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis are aggravated by the addition of posttransplant weight gain, physical inactivity, and reversal from catabolic to anabolic state. Moreover, although immunosuppressants are vital to avoid graft rejection, long-term exposure to these medications is implicated in metabolic impairments after LT. In this review, we summarize the molecular pathogenesis of different metabolic disorders after LT, including diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Furthermore, CVD, malignancies, and graft rejections were provided as significant complications of post-LT metabolic conditions threatening both the patient and graft survival. Ultimately, emerging preventive and treatment strategies for posttransplant diabetes mellitus are summarized. This review highlights the significant need for more clinical trials of antihyperglycemic agents in LT recipients. Also, translational studies will help us to better understand the molecular and genetic factors underlying these metabolic complications and could lead to more personalized management in this high-risk population.

Early use of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy after heart transplantation from a hepatitis C virus positive donor

Although statin therapy is a primary treatment to prevent cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), its use may be delayed due to pharmacologic interactions in the early post-transplant period among heart transplant (HT) recipients with hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+) donors. Further examination of the possible benefits of early, nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), such as PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), among this specific subset of transplant recipients is therefore becoming increasingly important. We report a 60-year-old man who received a HT from a HCV+ donor for end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy. In the early post-transplant period, there was concern for drug-drug interactions between statin, immunosuppressant, and direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. In addition, prior to transplant, he reported statin-associated muscle symptoms in response to multiple statins, which persisted despite attempts to re-challenge and use an every-other-day dosing strategy. Therefore, the patient was started on PCSK9i therapy after transplantation and while receiving curative DAA therapy for HCV. As the number of HT recipients of HCV+ donors continue to rise, investigation into the safety and benefits of early use of PCSK9i for the reduction of CAV and improved cardiovascular and mortality outcomes should be pursued.

Clinical Controversy in Transplantation: Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine in Statin Drug Interactions

Objective: To review the available literature that provides evidence for the absence of statin interactions with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine. Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed was performed (1990 to June 2019) using the following search terms: calcineurin inhibitors, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, statins, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and drug interactions. Clinical practice guidelines, article bibliographies, drug interaction database references, and product monographs were also reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant English-language studies describing the mechanism of interaction, the magnitude of pharmacokinetic alterations, and safety were evaluated. In vitro data and studies conducted in adult humans were considered. Data Synthesis: Studies demonstrate pharmacokinetic differences between cyclosporine and tacrolimus, particularly with regard to inhibition of 2 hepatic transporters: P-glycoprotein and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP). Compared with cyclosporine, tacrolimus does not affect these transporters, does not enhance statin exposure, and does not increase statin-associated safety events. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Clinical practice guidelines allude to the need to reduce statin doses in the setting of tacrolimus. Some providers have adopted this practice, and doing so may prevent transplant recipients from attaining cardiovascular benefit, especially when increased or high-intensity doses are required. The pharmacokinetic differences between tacrolimus and cyclosporine highlight different interaction potential with statins. Conclusions: Clinicians need to be aware that tacrolimus and cyclosporine are not the same with regard to causing drug interactions with statins. Tacrolimus can be used with statins without the need for dose adjustments because of lack of an interaction.