Use of HCV Ab+/NAT- donors in HCV naïve renal transplant recipients to expand the kidney donor pool

HIV and kidney transplantation in Romania: The index case

INTRODUCTION

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is no longer considered a contraindication for kidney transplantation (KT). KT management in HIV patients is a complex process with challenges, such as drug interactions between immunosuppression and antiretroviral (ARV) therapy. In our country, no KT has been performed thus far in this category of patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 29-year-old female patient with HIV and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who performed a KT from a related living donor in March 2022. KT immediate evolution was favorable. No transplant-related complications were reported. HIV viral load remained undetectable and CD4+ T cells were constantly > 500 cell/ μL, during the 18 months of follow-up. The main challenge in our case was the drug interaction between the protease inhibitor-based regimen and tacrolimus. This led to tacrolimus overdose, and, subsequently, change in ARV therapy. ARV switching was performed on a regimen based on integrase inhibitor and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. After the ARV change, the therapeutic level of tacrolimus was easily reached and maintained. Kidney graft function remained normal during follow-up, despite tacrolimus overexposure, and no rejection or anti-HLA antibodies were observed. Another challenge was related to the donor's hepatitis C virus status (positive antibodies, negative nucleic acid test). The recipient did not develop seroconversion or detectable viremia at 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-months post-KT.

CONCLUSION

We reported the first case of a successful KT in an ESRD patient with HIV in Romania, in whom the post-transplant evolution was favorable.

Utilization of Hepatitis B viremic donors (NAT+) leads to improved kidney transplant access for older adult recipients with little to no wait time

BACKGROUND

Though the use of Hepatitis B viremic (HBV) donor kidneys may be a safe alternative to improve access to transplantation, there has not been wide acceptance of this practice. In this study, we determined the safety and effectiveness of HBV NAT (+) donor kidneys in a protocolized manner in an older adult population.

METHODS

Over a 3-year period, 16 decreased donor kidney transplants were performed with HBV NAT+ kidneys. Recipients of HBV NAT+ kidneys were treated with entecavir started pre-operatively and continued for 52 weeks.

RESULTS

HBV NAT+ kidneys were preferentially used in older (68 ± 5 vs. 64 ± 9 years; p = .01) recipients with less dialysis time (93.8% < 5 years vs. 67% <5 years; p = .03). In this cohort, 3/16 had detectable HBV PCR 1-week post-transplant, but all were negative at 9- and 12-months. Calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was slightly decreased 12-months post-transplant. Post-transplant outcomes in an age-matched cohort showed no difference in rates of delayed graft function, readmission within 30 days, and graft loss or death within 6 months of transplant (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Transplants with HBV NAT+ donor kidneys in a pre-emptive treatment protocol allow for increased safe access to transplantation in older adult recipients with little or no dialysis time.

Use of Hepatitis C Virus Antibody-Positive Donors in Kidney Transplantation

Background The use of kidney donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been arising as a possibility to increase the donor pool. It encompasses both the use of donors with positive and negative viremia, particularly since the advent of direct antiviral agents that produce sustained virologic response. Methodology We conducted a retrospective observational study to describe the experience of our transplantation center in the use of HCV antibody-positive (HCV-Ab+) kidneys. Results We performed five transplants with HCV-Ab+ donors. The median age of kidney recipients was 63 (interquartile range (IQR) = 54-71) years, and 60% (n = 3) were males. Two recipients received a second transplant. The median dialysis vintage was 1,414 (IQR = 1,103-2,806) days. The induction immunosuppression protocol was basiliximab in most patients (60%, n = 3), and all received maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. One of the recipients had a personal history of cured HCV infection. Seroconversion occurred in half of the remaining patients, which was sustained during the follow-up. None of the patients developed HCV viremia. At the end of follow-up, mean creatinine and proteinuria were 1.45 ± 1.12 mg/dL and 0.099 ± 0.045 g/g, respectively. We did not observe any rejection episodes, need for dialysis, or recipient's death. Conclusions Our work aligns with the current literature that advocates that the use of these donors is safe and cost-effective and can be an effective strategy for expanding the donor pool and augmenting the transplantation volume. Seroconversion is a known risk whose mechanisms are not entirely understood, although it does not appear to be related to a higher transmission risk.

The association of donor hepatitis C virus infection with 3-year kidney transplant outcomes in the era of direct-acting antiviral medications

To determine the effect of donor hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on kidney transplant (KT) outcomes in the era of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications, we examined 68,087 HCV-negative KT recipients from a deceased donor between March 2015 and May 2021. A Cox regression analysis was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of KT failure, incorporating inverse probability of treatment weighting to control for patient selection to receive an HCV-positive kidney (either nucleic acid amplification test positive [NAT+, n = 2331] or antibody positive (Ab+)/NAT- [n = 1826]) based on recipient characteristics. Compared with kidney from HCV-negative donors, those from Ab+/NAT- (aHR = 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.10) and HCV NAT+ (aHR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73-1.08) donors were not associated with an increased risk of KT failure over 3 years after transplant. Moreover, HCV NAT+ kidneys were associated with a higher 1-year estimated glomerular filtration (63.0 vs 61.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = .007) and lower risk of delayed graft function (aOR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84) compared with HCV-negative kidneys. Our findings suggest that donor HCV positivity is not associated with an elevated risk of graft failure. The inclusion of donor HCV status in the Kidney Donor Risk Index may no longer be appropriate in contemporary practice.

Infections after organ transplantation and immune response

Organ transplantation has provided another chance of survival for end-stage organ failure patients. Yet, transplant rejection is still a main challenging factor. Immunosuppressive drugs have been used to avoid rejection and suppress the immune response against allografts. Thus, immunosuppressants increase the risk of infection in immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. The infection risk reflects the relationship between the nature and severity of immunosuppression and infectious diseases. Furthermore, immunosuppressants show an immunological impact on the genetics of innate and adaptive immune responses. This effect usually reactivates the post-transplant infection in the donor and recipient tissues since T-cell activation has a substantial role in allograft rejection. Meanwhile, different infections have been found to activate the T-cells into CD₄⁺ helper T-cell subset and CD₈⁺ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte that affect the infection and the allograft. Therefore, the best management and preventive strategies of immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and intensive medical care are required for successful organ transplantation. This review addresses the activation of immune responses against different infections in immunocompromised individuals after organ transplantation.

Outcome of Kidney Transplants from Viremic and Non-Viremic Hepatitis C Virus Positive Donors into Negative Recipients: Results of the Spanish Registry

Historically, donor infection with hepatitis-C virus (HCV) has been a barrier to kidney transplantation. However, in recent years, it has been reported that HCV positive kidney donors transplanted into HCV negative recipients offer acceptable mid-term results. However, acceptance of HCV donors, especially viremic, has not broadened in the clinical practice. This is an observational, multicenter, retrospective study including kidney transplants from HCV positive donors into negative recipients reported to the Spanish group from 2013 to 2021. Recipients from viremic donors received peri-transplant treatment with direct antiviral agents (DAA) for 8-12 weeks. We included 75 recipients from 44 HCV non-viremic donors and 41 from 25 HCV viremic donors. Primary non function, delayed graft function, acute rejection rate, renal function at the end of follow up, and patient and graft survival were not different between groups. Viral replication was not detected in recipients from non-viremic donors. Recipient treatment with DAA started pre-transplant avoids (n = 21) or attenuates (n = 5) viral replication but leads to non-different outcomes to post-transplant treatment with DAA (n = 15). HCV seroconversion was more frequent in recipients from viremic donors (73% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). One recipient of a viremic donor died due to hepatocellular carcinoma at 38 months. Donor HCV viremia seems not to be a risk factor for kidney transplant recipients receiving peri-transplant DAA, but continuous surveillance should be advised.

Renal transplantation using kidneys from hepatitis C-infected donors: A review of 30-years' experience

Kidney transplantation is the optimal therapy for end-stage kidney disease but limited by the available number of organs. Using HCV+ donors, both in HCV+ and HCV- recipients, is a rational response to the organ shortage. We review the historic experience using HCV+ donors in HCV+ recipients and assess long-term results. We also discuss contemporary practices, including the transplantation of HCV-viremic kidneys into HCV- recipients with different approaches to posttransplant HCV therapy.

Protocol for Optimizing the Use of Kidneys From Donors With Seropositivity for Hepatitis C Virus in Seronegative Recipients

BACKGROUND

The rapid identification of the viral load from hepatitis C virus (HCV) in seropositive donors enables the determination of their infection capacity and the subsequent design of a strategy to optimize the use of direct-action antivirals (DAA) in seronegative recipients. In 2017, we designed an optimization protocol; this study aims to assess its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicenter observational study that complies with the Declarations of Helsinki and Istanbul. Donors were HCV seropositive. The HCV and human immunodeficiency virus loads were immediately determined in the donors. For viremic donors, recipients were treated with DAA for 8 weeks. For nonviremic donors, DAA was started if a viral load was detected during the follow-up period. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months posttransplant.

RESULTS

This study recruited 28 donors. Just over half of the donors (n = 15; 53.5%) had a nonactive history of injection drug use. Eight (22.4%) donors were viremic, and 20 (87.6%) were nonviremic; 13 (65%) had been treated previously. Nine grafts were ineligible for the protocol. We performed a total of 47 transplants. Procedure I (viremic donors) was performed in 13 recipients (27.7%). Posttransplant viremia was observed in 6 participants. Posttransplant viremia was low (<100 IU/mL) in 4 participants but high (36,000 and 138,000 IU/mL) in 2 participants who had initiated DAA after the transplant; all these patients had a sustained viral response. Seroconversion was observed in 11 of 13 (84.6%) patients. Procedure II (nonviremic donors) was undertaken in 34 (82.3%) patients. No positive viral loads were observed. Seroconversion occurred in 7 of 34 (20.5%) recipients. All recipients maintained kidney function at 6 months posttransplant, except 1 patient with a graft that had never been functional and another patient who died of pancreatitis. Both patients had received kidneys from nonviremic donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience supports the efficacy and safety of this protocol.

Successful Implementation of an Increased Viral Risk Donor Waiting List for Preconsented Kidney Transplant Candidates in Victoria, Australia

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Increased viral risk donors (IVRDs) with increased risk behaviors for blood-borne virus infection and negative nucleic acid testing have a low absolute risk of “window period” infection. Utilization and allocation of IVRD organs differ between jurisdictions.

Race, Education, and Gender Disparities in Transplantation of Kidneys From Hepatitis C Viremic Donors

BACKGROUND

Transplantation of kidneys from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic donors into HCV-negative patients followed by direct-acting antiviral therapy was an important breakthrough to increase the number of life-saving kidney transplants. Data suggest that these transplants offer several benefits; however, it is unknown whether adoption of this practice has been shared equitably, especially among disadvantaged groups.

METHODS

We evaluated United Network for Organ Sharing data on HCV-seronegative adult deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients from January 1, 2017, to June 12, 2020. We compared recipients of a kidney from an HCV antibody- (Ab-)/nucleic acid test- (NAT-), HCV Ab+/NAT-, and HCV NAT+ donor. The primary covariates were as follows: (1) race/ethnicity; (2) female sex; and (3) highest level of education. Models included variables associated with being offered an HCV NAT+ kidney. We fit mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression models with the center as a random effect to account for patient clustering.

RESULTS

Of 48 255 adult kidney-alone deceased-donor kidney transplant HCV-seronegative recipients, 1641 (3.4%) donors were HCV NAT+-, increasing from 0.3% (January 2017-June 2017) to 6.9% (January 2020-June 2020). In multivariable models, racial/ethnic minorities, women, and those with less education were significantly less likely to receive a kidney from an HCV NAT+ donor relative to an HCV Ab-/NAT- and HCV Ab+/NAT- donor. The disparities were most pronounced among Hispanic and Asian patients with less educational attainment (grade school, high school, or some college/tech school).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in transplants from HCV NAT+ donors, we found substantial racial/ethnic disparities in transplantation of these kidneys. These data highlight how the benefits of a scientific breakthrough are often made less available to disadvantaged patients.

Expanding the Deceased Donor Pool in Manitoba Using Hepatitis C-Viremic Donors: Program Report

Purpose of program:

The ongoing shortage of organs for transplant combined with Manitoba having the highest prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Canada has resulted in long wait times on the deceased donor waitlist. Therefore, the Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program has ongoing quality improvement initiatives to expand the deceased donor pool. This clinical transplant protocol describes the use of prophylactic pan-genotypic direct-acting anti-viral agents (DAA) for transplanting hepatitis C (HCV)-viremic kidneys (HCV antibody positive/nucleic acid [nucleic acid amplification testing, NAT] positive) to HCV-naïve recipients as routine standard of care. We will evaluate the provincial implementation of this protocol as a prospective observational cohort study.

Sources of information:

Scoping literature review and key stakeholder engagement with interdisciplinary health care providers and health system leaders/decision markers.

Methods:

Patients will be screened pre-transplant for eligibility and undergo a multilevel education and consent process to participate in this expanded donor program. Incident adult HCV-naïve recipients of an HCV-viremic kidney transplant will be treated prophylactically with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir with the first dose administered on call to the operation. Glecaprevir-pibrentasvir will be used for 8 weeks with viral monitoring and hepatology follow-up. Primary outcomes are sustained virologic response (SVR) at 12 weeks and the tolerability of DAA therapy. Secondary outcomes within the first year post-transplant are patient and graft survival, graft function, biopsy-proven rejection, HCV transmission to recipient (HCV NAT positive), and HCV nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) resistance. Safety outcomes within the first year post-transplant include fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, acute liver failure, primary and secondary DAA treatment failure, HCV transmission to a recipient’s partner, elevated liver enzymes ≥2-fold, abnormal international normalized ratio (INR), angioedema, anaphylaxis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Key findings:

This program successfully advocated for and obtained hospital formulary, provincial Exceptional Drug Status (EDS), and Non-Insured Health Benefits (NIHB) to provide prophylactic DAA therapy for this indication, and this information may be useful to other provincial transplant organizations seeking to establish an HCV-viremic kidney transplant program with prophylactic DAA drug coverage.

Limitations:

(1) Patient engagement was not undertaken during the program design phase, but patient-reported experience measures will be obtained for continuous quality improvement. (2) Only standard criteria donors (optimal kidney donor profile index [KDPI] ≤60) will be used. If this approach is safe and feasible, then higher KDPI donors may be included.

Implications:

The goal of this quality improvement project is to improve access to kidney transplantation for Manitobans. This program will provide prophylactic DAA therapy for HCV-viremic kidney transplant to HCV-naïve recipients as routine standard of care outside a clinical trial protocol. We anticipate this program will be a safe and effective way to expand kidney transplantation from a previously unutilized donor pool.

A review of kidney transplantation from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-negative recipients

The safety and efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapies have allowed the transplantation of organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic donors into uninfected recipients. This novel strategy contrasts with the previous standard-of-care practice of limiting the transplantation of HCV infected-donor organs to HCV-infected recipients, or all too often, discarding viable organs. In this review, we summarize the published literature about the safety and feasibility of transplanting organs from HCV-viremic donors, the challenges that hinder wider adoption of this strategy, and future research needs.

Donor and Recipient Matching in Facial Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Closer Look at the Donor Pool

BACKGROUND

Identifying a donor for facial vascularized composite allotransplant recipients can be a lengthy, emotionally challenging process. Little is known about the relative distribution of key donor characteristics among potential donors. Data on actual wait times of patients are limited, making it difficult to estimate wait times for future recipients.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed charts of nine facial vascularized composite allotransplant patients and provide data on transplant wait times and patient characteristics. In addition, they analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing database of dead organ donors. After excluding donors with high-risk characteristics (e.g., active cancer or risk factors for blood-borne disease transmission), the authors calculated the distribution of relevant donor-recipient matching criteria (i.e., ethnicity, body mass index, age, ABO blood group, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis C virus) among 65,201 potential donors.

RESULTS

The median wait time for a transplant was 4 months (range, 1 day to 17 months). The large majority of United Network for Organ Sharing-recorded deaths from disease were white (63 percent) and male (58 percent). Female donors of black, Hispanic, or Asian descent are underrepresented, with 7, 5, and 1 percent of all recorded deaths from disease, respectively. Potential donors show cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus seropositivity of 65 and 95 percent, respectively. The number of annual hepatitis C-positive donors increased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Actual facial vascularized composite allotransplant wait times vary considerably. Although most patients experience acceptable wait times, some with underrepresented characteristics exceed acceptable levels. Cytomegalovirus-seropositive donors present a large portion of the donor pool, and exclusion for seronegative patients may increase wait time. Hepatitis C-seropositive donors may constitute a donor pool for underrepresented patient groups in the future.

Transplant of a Kidney from a Hepatitis C Viremic Donor to a Naïve Recipient without Viral Transmission: A Case Report

Patient: Male, 49-year-old

Final Diagnosis: HCV infection

Symptoms: Haematuria

Medication:—

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Transplantology

Updated View on Kidney Transplant from HCV-Infected Donors and DAAs

Background: The discrepancy between the number of potential available kidneys and the number of patients listed for kidney transplant continues to widen all over the world. The transplant of kidneys from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected donors into HCV naïve recipients has grown recently because of persistent kidney shortage and the availability of direct-acting antiviral agents. This strategy has the potential to reduce both waiting times for transplant and the risk of mortality in dialysis. Aim: We made an extensive review of the scientific literature in order to review the efficacy and safety of kidney transplant from HCV-viremic donors into HCV naïve recipients who received early antiviral therapy with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Results: Evidence has been rapidly accumulated on this topic and some reports have been published (n = 11 studies, n = 201 patients) over the last three years. Various combinations of DAAs were administered—elbasvir/grazoprevir (n = 38), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n = 110), and sofosbuvir-based regimens (n = 53). DAAs were initiated in a range between a few hours before renal transplant (RT) to a median of 76 days after RT. The sustained virological response (SVR) rate was between 97.5% and 100%. A few severe adverse events (SAEs) were noted including fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (n = 3), raised serum aminotransferase levels (n = 11), and acute rejection (n = 7). It remains unclear whether the AEs were related to the transmission of HCV, the use of DAAs, or kidney transplant per se. It appears that the frequency of AEs was greater in those studies where DAAs were not given in the very early post-kidney transplant phase. Conclusions: The evidence gathered to date encourages the expansion of the kidney donor pool with the adoption of HCV-infected donor organs. We suggest that kidney transplants from HCV-viremic kidneys into HCV-uninfected recipients should be made in the context of research protocols. Many of the studies reported above were externally funded and we need research generating “real-world” evidence. The recent availability of pangenotypic combinations of DAAs, which can be given even in patients with eGFR < 30/min/1.73 m², will promote the notion that HCV-viremic donors are a significant resource for kidney transplant.

Trends in Discard of Kidneys from Hepatitis C Viremic Donors in the United States

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Kidneys from hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors have become more commonly accepted for transplant, especially after effective direct-acting antiviral therapy became available in 2014. We examined the contemporary trend of kidney discard from donors with HCV seropositivity and viremia.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network were used to identify deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplant. The exposure was donor HCV antibody status in the first analyses, and donor HCV antibody and viremia status in the second analyses. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of these HCV exposure measures with kidney discard, adjusted for donor characteristics. Multilevel analyses were conducted to account for similar kidney discard pattern within clusters of organ procurement organizations and regions.

RESULTS

Among 225,479 kidneys recovered from 2005 to 2019, 5% were from HCV seropositive donors. Compared with HCV seronegative kidneys, the odds of HCV seropositive kidney discard gradually declined, from a multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 7.06 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.65 to 8.81) in 2014, to 1.20 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.42) in 2019. Among 82,090 kidneys with nucleic acid amplification test results in 2015-2019, 4% were from HCV viremic donors and 2% were from aviremic seropositive donors. Compared with HCV aviremic seronegative kidneys, the odds of HCV viremic kidney discard decreased from an aOR of 4.89 (95% CI, 4.03 to 5.92) in 2018, to 1.48 (95% CI, 1.22 to 1.81) in 2019. By 2018 and 2019, aviremic seropositive status was not associated with higher odds of discard (2018: aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.45; and 2019: aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the decrease in kidney discard in recent years, kidneys from viremic (compared with aviremic seronegative) donors still had 48% higher odds of discard in 2019. The potential of these discarded organs to provide successful transplantation should be explored.

Use of Hepatitis C Nucleic Acid Test-Positive Liver Allografts in Hepatitis C Virus Seronegative Recipients

Because of underutilization of liver allografts, our center previously showed that hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody-positive/nucleic acid test (NAT)-negative livers when transplanted into HCV nonviremic recipients were safe with a 10% risk of HCV transmission. Herein, we present our single-center prospective experience of using HCV NAT+ liver allografts transplanted into HCV NAT- recipients. An institutional review board-approved matched cohort study was conducted examining post- liver transplantation (LT) outcomes of HCV- patients who received HCV NAT+ organs (treatment group) compared with matched recipients with HCV NAT- organs (matched comparator group) between June 2018 to October 2019. The primary endpoint was success of HCV treatment and elimination of HCV infection. The secondary outcomes included the 30-day and 1-year graft and patient survival as well as perioperative complications. There were 32 recipients enrolled into each group. Because of 1 death in the index admission, 30/31 patients (97%) were given HCV treatment at a median starting time of 47 days (18-140 days) after LT. A total of 19 (63%) patients achieved sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12). Another 6 patients achieved end-of-treatment response, while 5 remained on therapy and 1 is yet to start treatment. No HCV treatment failure has been noted. There were no differences in 30-day and 1-year graft and patient survival, length of hospital stay, biliary or vascular complications, or cytomegalovirus viremia between the 2 groups. In this interim analysis of a matched cohort study, which is the first and largest study to date, the patients who received the HCV NAT+ organs had similar outcomes regarding graft function, patient survival, and post-LT complications.

Utilization of hepatitis C virus-infected organ donors in cardiothoracic transplantation: An ISHLT expert consensus statement

The advent of therapies for successful treatment of hepatitis C virus has allowed the heart and lung transplant community to re-explore the use of hepatitis C virus-positive donors for organ transplantation, with a benefit for many terminally ill patients. The consensus statements provided herein represent the current state of knowledge and expertise in this area, which we expect will continue to rapidly evolve over the next few years.

HCV-infected solid organ donors, direct-acting antivirals and the current challenges

Introduction: The introduction of direct-acting antiviral therapy has generated tremendous interest in transplanting organs from HCV-infected donors, an option which has the potential to lower waiting times for solid organ transplantation (including kidneys). Safe, effective and pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral agents are currently available.Areas covered: We have identified studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database to review risks and benefits on solid organ transplantation from HCV-exposed donors in uninfected recipients.Expert opinion: The transmission of HCV with transplantation from anti-HCV positive kidneys without viremia is extremely uncommon whereas recent evidence (five clinical studies, n = 94 patients) shows the absence of HCV infection in HCV-naïve recipients who received kidneys from HCV RNA-positive donors and underwent early DAAs. The evidence regarding non-kidney solid organ transplantation from HCV-infected donors is more limited. One report showed the occurrence of dialysis-dependent kidney failure due to glomerulonephritis induced by acute HCV after liver transplant from a NAT-positive donor into an HCV-naïve recipient. Transplantation of kidneys and other solid organs from HCV-viremic donors into uninfected recipients has the potential to become the standard of care resulting in lower waitlist mortality. Further studies are needed urgently to establish clinical practice guidelines on this topic.

New insights into the rational use of HCV+ organs worldwide

Hepatitis C (HCV) is a worldwide health problem. Effective therapies for HCV infection, coupled with an increase in deceased donors due to the opioid epidemic, have led to the broader availability and the use of HCV-infected donor organs, including HCV nucleic acid test-positive (NAT+) donors in HCV-negative recipients. In this review, we discuss the prevalence of HCV infection, trends in the use of HCV-infected donors, and outcomes for those who receive HCV-seropositive or HCV NAT+ donor organs. We discuss management considerations such as hepatitis B reactivation, selection of the optimal direct-acting antiviral regimen, and potential complications. We also present a framework for the rational use of HCV-infected donor organs in the future.