1
|
Watanabe K, Arva NC, Robinson JD, Rigsby C, Markl M, Sojka M, Tannous P, Arzu J, Husain N. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in detection of progressive graft dysfunction in pediatric heart transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14652. [PMID: 38063266 PMCID: PMC10872936 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic graft failure (CGF) in pediatric heart transplant (PHT) is multifactorial and may present with findings of fibrosis and microvessel disease (MVD) on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). There is no optimal CGF surveillance method. We evaluated associations between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and historical/EMB correlates of CGF to assess CMR's utility as a surveillance method. METHODS Retrospective analysis of PHT undergoing comprehensive CMR between September 2015 and January 2022 was performed. EMB within 6 months was graded for fibrosis (scale 0-5) and MVD (number of capillaries with stenotic wall thickening per field of view). Correlation analysis and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS Forty-seven PHT with median age at CMR of 15.7 years (11.6, 19.3) and time from transplant of 6.4 years (4.1, 11.0) were studied. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) was present in 11/44 (22.0%) and historical rejection in 14/41 (34.2%). CAV was associated with higher global T2 (49.0 vs. 47.0 ms; p = 0.038) and peak T2 (57.0 vs. 53.0 ms; p = 0.013) on CMR. Historical rejection was associated with higher global T2 (49.0 vs. 47.0 ms; p = 0.007) and peak T2 (57.0 vs. 53.0 ms; p = 0.03) as well as global extracellular volume (31.0 vs. 26.3%; p = 0.03). Higher fibrosis score on EMB correlated with smaller indexed left ventricular mass (rho = -0.34; p = 0.019) and greater degree of MVD with lower indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (rho = -0.35; p = 0.017). CONCLUSION Adverse ventricular remodeling and abnormal myocardial characteristics on CMR are present in PHT with CAV, historical rejection, as well as greater fibrosis and MVD on EMB. CMR has the potential use for screening of CGF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kae Watanabe
- Lille Frank Abercrombie Section of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicoleta C. Arva
- Department of Pathology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Joshua D. Robinson
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Cynthia Rigsby
- Division of Pediatric Radiology, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael Markl
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Melanie Sojka
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Paul Tannous
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jennifer Arzu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Nazia Husain
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Madias JE. Serial electrocardiograms at follow-up for early detection of transplanted heart rejection: A viewpoint. J Electrocardiol 2024; 82:136-140. [PMID: 38141486 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
This viewpoint proposed that serial electrocardiograms (ECG) could be used to monitor for heart transplantation (HT) rejection, based on the expected attenuation of the amplitude of ECG QRS complexes (attQRS) engendered by the rejection-induced decrease in electrical resistance due to the underlying myocardial edema (ME). Previous work in humans has shown attQRS in the setting of a diverse array of edematous states, affecting the myocardium (i.e, ME) and the body volume conductor "enveloping" the heart. Also, animal and human experience has revealed low electrical resistance during mild/moderate HT rejection. Studies with serial correlations of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and ECG are recommended, which will merely require recording of an ECG, when EMB and imaging studies are carried out for monitoring of post-HT rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John E Madias
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, and the Division of Cardiology, Elmhurst Hospital Center, Elmhurst, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huo M, Ma L, Liu G. Exploring the mechanism of Yixinyin for myocardial infarction by weighted co-expression network and molecular docking. Sci Rep 2021; 11:22567. [PMID: 34799616 PMCID: PMC8604969 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01691-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Yixinyin, the traditional Chinese medicine, has the effects of replenishing righteous qi, and promoting blood circulation to eliminate blood stagnation. It is often used to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). The purpose of our study is to explore the key components and targets of Yixinyin in the treatment of MI. In this study, we analyzed gene expression data and clinical information from 248 samples of MI patients with the GSE34198, GSE29111 and GSE66360 data sets. By constructing a weighted gene co-expression network, gene modules related to myocardial infarction are obtained. These modules can be mapped in Yixinyin PPI network. By integrating differential genes of healthy/MI and unstable angina/MI, key targets of Yixinyin for the treatment of myocardial infarction were screened. We validated the key objectives with external data sets. GSEA analysis is used to identify the biological processes involved in key targets. Through molecular docking screening, active components that can combine with key targets in Yixinyin were obtained. In the treatment of myocardial infarction, we have obtained key targets of Yixinyin, which are ALDH2, C5AR1, FOS, IL1B, TLR2, TXNRD1. External data sets prove that they behave differently in the healthy and MI (P < 0.05). GSEA enrichment analysis revealed that they are mainly involved in pathways associated with myocardial infarction, such as viral myocarditis, VEGF signaling pathway and type I diabetes mellitus. The docking results showed that the components that can be combined with key targets in YixinYin are Supraene, Prostaglandin B1, isomucronulatol-7,2'-di-O-glucosiole, angusifolin B, Linolenic acid ethyl ester, and Mandenol. For that matter, they may be active ingredients of Yixinyin in treating MI. These findings provide a basis for the preliminary research of myocardial infarction therapy in traditional Chinese medicine and provide ideas for the design of related drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengqi Huo
- School of Chinese Material Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Lina Ma
- Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Section, Henan Medical College, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Guoguo Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Liuzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Han D, Miller RJH, Otaki Y, Gransar H, Kransdorf E, Hamilton M, Kittelson M, Patel J, Kobashigawa JA, Thomson L, Berman D, Tamarappoo B. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Cardiac Transplant Rejection: A Meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 14:2337-2349. [PMID: 34274269 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic performance of various CMR imaging parameters for evaluating acute cardiac transplant rejection. BACKGROUND Endomyocardial biopsy is the current gold standard for detection of acute cardiac transplant rejection. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is uniquely capable of myocardial tissue characterization and may be useful as a noninvasive alternative for the diagnosis of graft rejection. METHODS PubMed and Web of Science were searched for relevant publications reporting on the use of CMR myocardial tissue characterization for detection of acute cardiac transplant rejection with endomyocardial biopsy as the reference standard. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and hierarchical modeling-based summary receiver-operating characteristic curves were calculated. RESULTS Of 478 papers, 10 studies comprising 564 patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of acute cardiac transplant rejection were 84.6 (95% CI: 65.6-94.0) and 70.1 (95% CI: 54.2-82.2) for T1, 86.5 (95% CI: 72.1-94.1) and 85.9 (95% CI: 65.2-94.6) for T2, 91.3 (95% CI: 63.9-98.4) and 67.6 (95% CI: 56.1-77.4) for extracellular volume fraction (ECV), and 50.1 (95% CI: 31.2-68.9) and 60.2 (95% CI: 36.7-79.7) for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The areas under the hierarchical modeling-based summary receiver-operating characteristic curve were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87) for T1, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-94) for T2, 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81) for ECV, and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.51-0.60) for LGE. T2 values demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, followed by native T1, ECV, and LGE (all P values < 0.001 for T1, ECV, and LGE vs T2). CONCLUSIONS T2 mapping demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy than other CMR techniques. Native T1 and ECV provide high diagnostic use but lower diagnostic accuracy compared with T2, which was related primarily to lower specificity. LGE showed poor diagnostic performance for detection of rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donghee Han
- Department of Imaging, Mark Taper Imaging Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Robert J H Miller
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yuka Otaki
- Department of Imaging, Mark Taper Imaging Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Heidi Gransar
- Department of Imaging, Mark Taper Imaging Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Evan Kransdorf
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michelle Hamilton
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michele Kittelson
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jignesh Patel
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jon A Kobashigawa
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Louise Thomson
- Department of Imaging, Mark Taper Imaging Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daniel Berman
- Department of Imaging, Mark Taper Imaging Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Balaji Tamarappoo
- Department of Imaging, Mark Taper Imaging Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giarraputo A, Barison I, Fedrigo M, Burrello J, Castellani C, Tona F, Bottio T, Gerosa G, Barile L, Angelini A. A Changing Paradigm in Heart Transplantation: An Integrative Approach for Invasive and Non-Invasive Allograft Rejection Monitoring. Biomolecules 2021; 11:biom11020201. [PMID: 33535640 PMCID: PMC7912846 DOI: 10.3390/biom11020201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiac allograft rejection following heart transplantation is challenging to diagnose. Tissue biopsies are the gold standard in monitoring the different types of rejection. The last decade has seen an increased emphasis on identifying non-invasive methods to improve rejection diagnosis and overcome tissue biopsy invasiveness. Liquid biopsy, as an efficient non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic oncological monitoring tool, seems to be applicable in heart transplant follow-ups. Moreover, molecular techniques applied on blood can be translated to tissue samples to provide novel perspectives on tissue and reveal new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art of the new methodologies in cardiac allograft rejection monitoring and investigate the future perspectives on invasive and non-invasive rejection biomarkers identification. We reviewed literature from the most used scientific databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. We extracted 192 papers and, after a selection and exclusion process, we included in the review 81 papers. The described limitations notwithstanding, this review show how molecular biology techniques and omics science could be deployed complementarily to the histopathological rejection diagnosis on tissue biopsies, thus representing an integrated approach for heart transplant patients monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Giarraputo
- Cardiovascular Pathology and Pathological Anatomy, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (A.G.); (I.B.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Ilaria Barison
- Cardiovascular Pathology and Pathological Anatomy, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (A.G.); (I.B.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Marny Fedrigo
- Cardiovascular Pathology and Pathological Anatomy, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (A.G.); (I.B.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Jacopo Burrello
- Laboratory for Cardiovascular Theranostics, Cardiocentro Ticino Foundation, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (J.B.); (L.B.)
| | - Chiara Castellani
- Cardiovascular Pathology and Pathological Anatomy, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (A.G.); (I.B.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Francesco Tona
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (F.T.); (T.B.); (G.G.)
| | - Tomaso Bottio
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (F.T.); (T.B.); (G.G.)
| | - Gino Gerosa
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (F.T.); (T.B.); (G.G.)
| | - Lucio Barile
- Laboratory for Cardiovascular Theranostics, Cardiocentro Ticino Foundation, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (J.B.); (L.B.)
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - Annalisa Angelini
- Cardiovascular Pathology and Pathological Anatomy, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (A.G.); (I.B.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-049-821-1699
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eck BL, Flamm SD, Kwon DH, Tang WHW, Vasquez CP, Seiberlich N. Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting: Trends in technical development and potential clinical applications. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY 2021; 122:11-22. [PMID: 33632415 PMCID: PMC8366914 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged in recent years as an approach for evaluating a range of cardiovascular conditions, with T1 and T2 mapping at the forefront of these developments. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (cMRF) provides a rapid and robust framework for simultaneous quantification of myocardial T1 and T2 in addition to other tissue properties. Since the advent of cMRF, a number of technical developments and clinical validation studies have been reported. This review provides an overview of cMRF, recent technical developments, healthy subject and patient studies, anticipated technical improvements, and potential clinical applications. Recent technical developments include slice profile and pulse efficiency corrections, improvements in image reconstruction, simultaneous multislice imaging, 3D whole-ventricle imaging, motion-resolved imaging, fat-water separation, and machine learning for rapid dictionary generation. Future technical developments in cMRF, such as B0 and B1 field mapping, acceleration of acquisition and reconstruction, imaging of patients with implanted devices, and quantification of additional tissue properties are also described. Potential clinical applications include characterization of infiltrative, inflammatory, and ischemic cardiomyopathies, tissue characterization in the left atrium and right ventricle, post-cardiac transplantation assessment, reduction of contrast material, pre-procedural planning for electrophysiology interventions, and imaging of patients with implanted devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan L Eck
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - Scott D Flamm
- Heart and Vascular Institute and Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - Deborah H Kwon
- Heart and Vascular Institute and Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - W H Wilson Tang
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - Claudia Prieto Vasquez
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK.
| | - Nicole Seiberlich
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HTx) remains the optimal treatment for selected patients with end-stage advanced heart failure. However, survival is limited early by acute rejection and long term by cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Even though the diagnosis of rejection is based on histology, cardiac imaging provides a pivotal role for early detection and severity assessment of these hazards. The present review focuses on the use and reliability of different invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities to detect and monitor CAV and rejection after HTx. Coronary angiography remains the corner stone in routine CAV surveillance. However, angiograms are invasive and underestimates the CAV severity especially in the early phase. Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography are invasive methods for intracoronary imaging that detects early CAV lesions not evident by angiograms. Non-invasive imaging can be divided into myocardial perfusion imaging, anatomical/structural imaging and myocardial functional imaging. The different non-invasive imaging modalities all provide clinical and prognostic information and may have a gatekeeper role for invasive monitoring. Acute rejection and CAV are still significant clinical problems after HTx. No imaging modality provides complete information on graft function, coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion. However, a combination of invasive and non-invasive modalities at different stages following HTx should be considered for optimal personalized surveillance and risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hans Eiskjær
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Snel GJH, van den Boomen M, Hernandez LM, Nguyen CT, Sosnovik DE, Velthuis BK, Slart RHJA, Borra RJH, Prakken NHJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance native T 2 and T 2* quantitative values for cardiomyopathies and heart transplantations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020; 22:34. [PMID: 32393281 PMCID: PMC7212597 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00627-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical application of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T2 and T2* mapping is currently limited as ranges for healthy and cardiac diseases are poorly defined. In this meta-analysis we aimed to determine the weighted mean of T2 and T2* mapping values in patients with myocardial infarction (MI), heart transplantation, non-ischemic cardiomyopathies (NICM) and hypertension, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) of each population with healthy controls. Additionally, the variation of mapping outcomes between studies was investigated. METHODS The PRISMA guidelines were followed after literature searches on PubMed and Embase. Studies reporting CMR T2 or T2* values measured in patients were included. The SMD was calculated using a random effects model and a meta-regression analysis was performed for populations with sufficient published data. RESULTS One hundred fifty-four studies, including 13,804 patient and 4392 control measurements, were included. T2 values were higher in patients with MI, heart transplantation, sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, amyloidosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and myocarditis (SMD of 2.17, 1.05, 0.87, 1.39, 1.62, 1.95, 1.90 and 1.33, respectively, P < 0.01) compared with controls. T2 values in iron overload patients (SMD = - 0.54, P = 0.30) and Anderson-Fabry disease patients (SMD = 0.52, P = 0.17) did both not differ from controls. T2* values were lower in patients with MI and iron overload (SMD of - 1.99 and - 2.39, respectively, P < 0.01) compared with controls. T2* values in HCM patients (SMD = - 0.61, P = 0.22), DCM patients (SMD = - 0.54, P = 0.06) and hypertension patients (SMD = - 1.46, P = 0.10) did not differ from controls. Multiple CMR acquisition and patient demographic factors were assessed as significant covariates, thereby influencing the mapping outcomes and causing variation between studies. CONCLUSIONS The clinical utility of T2 and T2* mapping to distinguish affected myocardium in patients with cardiomyopathies or heart transplantation from healthy myocardium seemed to be confirmed based on this meta-analysis. Nevertheless, variation of mapping values between studies complicates comparison with external values and therefore require local healthy reference values to clinically interpret quantitative values. Furthermore, disease differentiation seems limited, since changes in T2 and T2* values of most cardiomyopathies are similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G J H Snel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - M van den Boomen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - L M Hernandez
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - C T Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - D E Sosnovik
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
- Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard-MIT, 7 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - B K Velthuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H J A Slart
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Photonic Imaging, University of Twente, Dienstweg 1, 7522 ND, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - R J H Borra
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - N H J Prakken
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|