Mesangial expansion at 5 years predicts death and death-censored graft loss after renal transplantation

Mesangial Expansion by Morphometry at 5 y After Kidney Transplantation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Association With Graft Loss

Background

Mesangial expansion (ME) is an understudied histologic lesion in renal allografts. The current Banff mm score is not reproducible and may miss important ME features. The study aimed to improve the quantification of ME using morphometry, assess changes over time, and determine its association with allograft loss.

Methods

We studied ME in 1-y and 5-y surveillance biopsies in 835 kidney transplants performed between January 2000 and December 2013. ME was assessed using the Banff mm score by a central pathologist and by morphometry. We derived 3 different morphometric measures: (1) %ME mm (%glomeruli with ME in ≥2 lobules, like Banff mm); (2) %MEany (%glomeruli with any ME lesion); and (3) %ME area (sum of all ME areas/all glomerular tuft areas). Unadjusted and adjusted Cox models assessed the risk of death-censored allograft loss.

Results

From 1- to 5-y biopsies, the mean Banff mm score increased from 0.18 to 0.34, whereas %ME mm increased from 2.5% to 13.3%. Banff mm score had modest correlations with morphometric ME measures. Moderate-severe %ME mm was present in 20.1% of 5-y biopsies, whereas only 6.6% of Banff mm scores were. In general, higher ME on both 1- and 5-y biopsies was associated with a deceased donor, older recipient age, recipient diabetes/obesity (present in >50% of severely affected biopsies), higher hemoglobin A1c at 5 y posttransplant, and recurrent kidney disease. Higher ME on 5-y biopsies was associated with delayed graft function. A higher Banff mm score at 1-y biopsy and morphometry ME measures at 5-y biopsy were associated with rejection during the first year posttransplant. Morphometric ME measures were associated with allograft loss independent of Banff scores and all clinical characteristics, including kidney function and recurrent disease. The model with %MEany had the highest c-statistic (0.872).

Conclusions

Banff mm score underestimates the pervasiveness of ME in 5-y biopsies. ME is common and associated with alloimmune and nonalloimmune causes of graft loss.

Weight Loss Surgery Increases Kidney Transplant Rates in Patients With Renal Failure and Obesity

OBJECTIVE

To describe the outcomes of kidney transplant (KT) candidates with obesity undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to meet the criteria for KT.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted of electronic medical records of KT candidates with obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m2) who underwent SG in our institution. Weight loss, adverse health events, and the listing and transplant rates were abstracted and compared with the nonsurgical cohort.

RESULTS

The SG was performed in 54 patients; 50 patients did not have surgery. Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable at the time of evaluation. Mean body mass index ± SD of the SG group was 41.7±3.6 kg/m2 at baseline (vs 41.5±4.3 kg/m2 for nonsurgical controls); at 2 and 12 months after SG, it was 36.4±4.1 kg/m2 and 32.6±4.0 kg/m2 (P<.01 for both). In the median follow-up time of 15.5 months (interquartile range, 6.4 to 23.9 months), SG was followed by active listing (37/54 people), and 20 of 54 received KT during a median follow-up time of 20.9 months (interquartile range, 14.7 to 28.3 months) after SG. In contrast, 14 of 50 patients in the nonsurgical cohort were listed, and 5 received a KT (P<.01). Three patients (5.6%) experienced surgical complications. There was no difference in overall hospitalization rates and adverse health outcomes, but the SG cohort experienced a higher risk of clinically significant functional decline.

CONCLUSION

In KT candidates with obesity, SG appears to be effective, with 37% of patients undergoing KT during the next 18 months (P<.01). Further research is needed to confirm and to improve the safety and efficacy of SG for patients with obesity seeking a KT.

Nutritional Considerations for Patients With Renal Failure Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy

Obesity is highly prevalent in patients with renal disease, as it contributes to or accelerates the progression of kidney disease and is frequently a barrier to kidney transplantation. Patients with renal disease have unique dietary needs due to various metabolic disturbances resulting from altered processing and clearance of nutrients. They also frequently present with physical disability, resulting in difficulty achieving adequate weight loss through lifestyle modifications. Therefore, kidney transplant candidates may benefit from bariatric surgery, particularly sleeve gastrectomy (SG), as the safest, most effective, and long-lasting weight loss option to improve comorbidities and access to transplantation. However, concerns regarding nutritional risks prevent broader dissemination of SG in this population. No specific guidelines tailored to the nutritional needs of patients with renal disease undergoing SG have been developed. Moreover, appropriate monitoring strategies and interventions for muscle loss and functional status preservation, a major concern in this at-risk population, are unknown. We aimed to summarize the available literature on the nutritional requirements of patients with renal disease seeking SG as a bridge to transplantation. We also provide insight and guidance into the nutritional management pre and post-SG.

Guiding Kidney Transplantation Candidates for Effective Weight Loss: A Clinical Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Obesity is increasingly common in kidney transplant candidates and may limit access to transplantation. Obesity and diabetes are associated with a high risk for post-transplant complications. The best approach to weight loss to facilitate active transplant listing is unknown, but bariatric surgery is rarely considered due to patient- and physician-related apprehension, among other factors.

METHODS

We aimed to determine the magnitude of weight loss, listing, and transplant rates in 28 candidates with a mean BMI of 44.4±4.6 kg/m² and diabetes treated conservatively for 1 year post weight-loss consultations (group 1). Additionally, we evaluated 15 patients (group 2) who met the inclusion criteria but received bariatric intervention within the same time frame. All patients completed a multidisciplinary weight management consultation with at least 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

In the conservatively managed group (group 1), the mean weight at the time of initial consultation was 126.5±18.5 kg, and the mean BMI was 44.4±4.6 kg/m². At 1 year post weight-loss consultation, the mean weight decreased by 4.4±8.2 kg to 122.9±17 kg, and the mean BMI was 43±4.8 kg/m², with a total mean body weight decrease of 3% (P=0.01). Eighteen patients (64%) did not progress to become candidates for active listing/transplantation during the follow-up time of 4±2.9 years, with 15 (54%) subsequently developing renal failure/diabetes-related comorbidities prohibitive for transplantation. In contrast, mean total body weight decreased by 19% at 6 months post bariatric surgery, and the mean BMI was 34.2±4 and 32.5±3.7 kg/m² at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Bariatric surgery was strongly associated with subsequent kidney transplantation (HR=8.39 [95% CI 1.71 to 41.19]; P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

A conservative weight-loss approach involving multidisciplinary consultation was ineffective in most kidney transplant candidates with diabetes, suggesting that a more proactive approach is needed.