1
|
Avey S, Chatterjee M, Manyakov NV, Cooper P, Sabins N, Mosca K, Mori S, Baribaud F, Morris M, Lehar J, Deiteren A, Cossu M, Smets S, Huizer T, Lamousé‐Smith E, Campbell K, Pandis I. Using a wearable patch to develop a digital monitoring biomarker of inflammation in response to LPS challenge. Clin Transl Sci 2024; 17:e13734. [PMID: 38380580 PMCID: PMC10880037 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Remote inflammation monitoring with digital health technologies (DHTs) would provide valuable information for both clinical research and care. Controlled perturbations of the immune system may reveal physiological signatures which could be used to develop a digital biomarker of inflammatory state. In this study, molecular and physiological profiling was performed following an in vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge to develop a digital biomarker of inflammation. Ten healthy volunteers received an intravenous LPS challenge and were monitored for 24 h using the VitalConnect VitalPatch (VitalPatch). VitalPatch measurements included heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), respiratory rate (RR), and skin temperature (TEMP). Conventional episodic inpatient vital signs and serum proteins were measured pre- and post-LPS challenge. The VitalPatch provided vital signs that were comparable to conventional methods for assessing HR, RR, and TEMP. A pronounced increase was observed in HR, RR, and TEMP as well as a decrease in HRV 1-4 h post-LPS challenge. The ordering of participants by magnitude of inflammatory cytokine response 2 h post-LPS challenge was consistent with ordering of participants by change from baseline in vital signs when measured by VitalPatch (r = 0.73) but not when measured by conventional methods (r = -0.04). A machine learning model trained on VitalPatch data predicted change from baseline in inflammatory protein response (R2 = 0.67). DHTs, such as VitalPatch, can improve upon existing episodic measurements of vital signs by enabling continuous sensing and have the potential for future use as tools to remotely monitor inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Avey
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | | | | | - Philip Cooper
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Nina Sabins
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Kenneth Mosca
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Simone Mori
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Frédéric Baribaud
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Mark Morris
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Joseph Lehar
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | | | - Marta Cossu
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Sophie Smets
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentMerksemBelgium
| | - Tanja Huizer
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Esi Lamousé‐Smith
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Kim Campbell
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentSpring HousePennsylvaniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Posthuma LM, Breteler MJM, Lirk PB, Nieveen van Dijkum EJ, Visscher MJ, Breel JS, Wensing CAGL, Schenk J, Vlaskamp LB, van Rossum MC, Ruurda JP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Hollmann MW, Kalkman CJ, Preckel B. Surveillance of high-risk early postsurgical patients for real-time detection of complications using wireless monitoring (SHEPHERD study): results of a randomized multicenter stepped wedge cluster trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 10:1295499. [PMID: 38249988 PMCID: PMC10796990 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1295499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Vital signs measurements on the ward are performed intermittently. This could lead to failure to rapidly detect patients with deteriorating vital signs and worsens long-term outcome. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that continuous wireless monitoring of vital signs on the postsurgical ward improves patient outcome. Methods In this prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized study, patients in the control group received standard monitoring. The intervention group received continuous wireless monitoring of heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature on top of standard care. Automated alerts indicating vital signs deviation from baseline were sent to ward nurses, triggering the calculation of a full early warning score followed. The primary outcome was the occurrence of new disability three months after surgery. Results The study was terminated early (at 57% inclusion) due to COVID-19 restrictions. Therefore, only descriptive statistics are presented. A total of 747 patients were enrolled in this study and eligible for statistical analyses, 517 patients in the control group and 230 patients in the intervention group, the latter only from one hospital. New disability at three months after surgery occurred in 43.7% in the control group and in 39.1% in the intervention group (absolute difference 4.6%). Conclusion This is the largest randomized controlled trial investigating continuous wireless monitoring in postoperative patients. While patients in the intervention group seemed to experience less (new) disability than patients in the control group, results remain inconclusive with regard to postoperative patient outcome due to premature study termination. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02957825.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M. Posthuma
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Philipp B. Lirk
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Els J. Nieveen van Dijkum
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten J. Visscher
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennifer S. Breel
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carin A. G. L. Wensing
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jimmy Schenk
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lyan B. Vlaskamp
- Department of Anesthesiologie, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Jelle P. Ruurda
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal and Oncologic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Markus W. Hollmann
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cor J. Kalkman
- Department of Anesthesiologie, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Benedikt Preckel
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science, Diabetes and Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bertha A, Alaj R, Bousnina I, Doyle MK, Friend D, Kalamegham R, Oliva L, Knezevic I, Kramer F, Podhaisky HP, Reimann S. Incorporating digitally derived endpoints within clinical development programs by leveraging prior work. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6:139. [PMID: 37563201 PMCID: PMC10415378 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00886-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Bertha
- Bayer, 801 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20004, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Izmailova ES, AbuAsal B, Hassan HE, Saha A, Stephenson D. Digital technologies: Innovations that transform the face of drug development. Clin Transl Sci 2023; 16:1323-1330. [PMID: 37157935 PMCID: PMC10432869 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, digital health technologies (DHTs) and digital biomarkers have gained a lot of traction in clinical investigations, motivating sponsors, investigators, and regulators to discuss and implement integrated approaches for deploying DHTs. These new tools present new and unique challenges for optimal technology integration in clinical trial processes, including operational, ethical, and regulatory issues. In this paper, we gathered different perspectives to discuss challenges and perspectives from three different stakeholders: industry, US regulators, and a public-private partnership consortium. The complexities of DHT implementation, which include regulatory definitions, defining the scope of validation experiments, and the need for partnerships between BioPharma and the technology sectors, are highlighted. Most of these challenges are related to translation of DHT-derived measures into endpoints that are meaningful to clinicians and patients, participant safety, training, and retention and privacy of data. The example of the Wearable Assessments in the Clinic and Home in PD (WATCH-PD) study is discussed as an example that demonstrated the advantages of pre-competitive collaborations, which include early regulatory feedback, data sharing, and multistakeholder alignment. Future advances in DHTs are expected to spur device-agnostic measured development and incorporate patient reported outcomes in drug development. More efforts are needed to define validation experiments for a defined context of use, incentivize data sharing and development of data standards. Multistakeholder collaborations via precompetitive consortia will help facilitate broad acceptance of DHT-enabled measures in drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bilal AbuAsal
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| | - Hazem E. Hassan
- Department of Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of MarylandMarylandBaltimoreUSA
| | - Anindita Saha
- Digital Health Center of Excellence, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leenen JPL, Rasing HJM, Kalkman CJ, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Process Evaluation of a Wireless Wearable Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring Intervention in 2 General Hospital Wards: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Nurs 2023; 6:e44061. [PMID: 37140977 DOI: 10.2196/44061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous monitoring of vital signs (CMVS) using wearable wireless sensors is increasingly available to patients in general wards and can improve outcomes and reduce nurse workload. To assess the potential impact of such systems, successful implementation is important. We developed a CMVS intervention and implementation strategy and evaluated its success in 2 general wards. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess and compare intervention fidelity in 2 wards (internal medicine and general surgery) of a large teaching hospital. METHODS A mixed methods sequential explanatory design was used. After thorough training and preparation, CMVS was implemented-in parallel with the standard intermittent manual measurements-and executed for 6 months in each ward. Heart rate and respiratory rate were measured using a chest-worn wearable sensor, and vital sign trends were visualized on a digital platform. Trends were routinely assessed and reported each nursing shift without automated alarms. The primary outcome was intervention fidelity, defined as the proportion of written reports and related nurse activities in case of deviating trends comparing early (months 1-2), mid- (months 3-4), and late (months 5-6) implementation periods. Explanatory interviews with nurses were conducted. RESULTS The implementation strategy was executed as planned. A total of 358 patients were included, resulting in 45,113 monitored hours during 6142 nurse shifts. In total, 10.3% (37/358) of the sensors were replaced prematurely because of technical failure. Mean intervention fidelity was 70.7% (SD 20.4%) and higher in the surgical ward (73.6%, SD 18.1% vs 64.1%, SD 23.7%; P<.001). Fidelity decreased over the implementation period in the internal medicine ward (76%, 57%, and 48% at early, mid-, and late implementation, respectively; P<.001) but not significantly in the surgical ward (76% at early implementation vs 74% at midimplementation [P=.56] vs 70.7% at late implementation [P=.07]). No nursing activities were needed based on vital sign trends for 68.7% (246/358) of the patients. In 174 reports of 31.3% (112/358) of the patients, observed deviating trends led to 101 additional bedside assessments of patients and 73 consultations by physicians. The main themes that emerged during interviews (n=21) included the relative priority of CMVS in nurse work, the importance of nursing assessment, the relatively limited perceived benefits for patient care, and experienced mediocre usability of the technology. CONCLUSIONS We successfully implemented a system for CMVS at scale in 2 hospital wards, but our results show that intervention fidelity decreased over time, more in the internal medicine ward than in the surgical ward. This decrease appeared to depend on multiple ward-specific factors. Nurses' perceptions regarding the value and benefits of the intervention varied. Implications for optimal implementation of CMVS include engaging nurses early, seamless integration into electronic health records, and sophisticated decision support tools for vital sign trend interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jobbe P L Leenen
- Connected Care Center, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
- Isala Academy, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | | | - Cor J Kalkman
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Lisette Schoonhoven
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Gijsbert A Patijn
- Connected Care Center, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leenen JPL, Dijkman EM, van Hout A, Kalkman CJ, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Nurses' experiences with continuous vital sign monitoring on the general surgical ward: a qualitative study based on the Behaviour Change Wheel. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:60. [PMID: 35287678 PMCID: PMC8919550 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00837-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To support early recognition of clinical deterioration on a general ward continuous vital signs monitoring (CMVS) systems using wearable devices are increasingly being investigated. Although nurses play a crucial role in successful implementation, reported nurse adoption and acceptance scores vary significantly. In-depth insight into the perspectives of nurses regarding CMVS is lacking. To this end, we applied a theoretical approach for behaviour change derived from the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Aim To provide insight in the capability, opportunity and motivation of nurses working with CMVS, in order to inform future implementation efforts. Methods A qualitative study was conducted, including twelve nurses of a surgical ward in a tertiary teaching hospital with previous experience of working with CMVS. Semi-structured interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis. The results were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation – Behaviour (COM-B) model of the BCW. Results Five key themes emerged. The theme ‘Learning and coaching on the job’ linked to Capability. Nurses favoured learning about CVSM by dealing with it in daily practice. Receiving bedside guidance and coaching was perceived as important. The theme ‘interpretation of vital sign trends’ also linked to Capability. Nurses mentioned the novelty of monitoring vital sign trends of patients on wards. The theme ‘Management of alarms’ linked to Opportunity. Nurses perceived the (false) alarms generated by the system as excessive resulting in feelings of irritation and uncertainty. The theme ‘Integration and compatibility with clinical workflow’ linked to Opportunity. CVSM was experienced as helpful and easy to use, although integration in mobile devices and the EMR was highly favoured and the management of clinical workflows would need improvement. The theme ‘Added value for nursing care’ linked to Motivation. All nurses recognized the potential added value of CVSM for postoperative care. Conclusion Our findings suggest all parts of the COM-B model should be considered when implementing CVSM on general wards. When the themes in Capability and Opportunity are not properly addressed by selecting interventions and policy categories, this may negatively influence the Motivation and may compromise successful implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-022-00837-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P L Leenen
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands. .,Connected Care Centre, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
| | - E M Dijkman
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - A van Hout
- Research Group IT Innovations in Health Care, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Campus 2-6, Zwolle, 8017CA, The Netherlands
| | - C J Kalkman
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L Schoonhoven
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, University Rd, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - G A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.,Connected Care Centre, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feasibility of wireless continuous monitoring of vital signs without using alarms on a general surgical ward: A mixed methods study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265435. [PMID: 35286354 PMCID: PMC8947816 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Wireless continuous vital sign monitoring by wearable devices have recently become available for patients on general wards to promote timely detection of clinical deterioration. Many continuous monitoring systems use conventional threshold alarm settings to alert nurses in case of deviating vital signs. However, frequent false alarms often lead to alarm fatigue and inefficiencies in the workplace. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of continuous vital sign monitoring without the use of alarms, thereby exclusively relying on interval trend monitoring. Methods This explanatory sequential mixed methods study was conducted at an abdominal surgical ward of a tertiary teaching hospital. Heart rate and respiratory rate of patients were measured every minute by a wearable sensor. Trends were visualized and assessed six times per day by nurses and once a day by doctors during morning rounds. Instead of using alarms we focused exclusively on regular vital sign trend analysis by nurses and doctors. Primary outcome was feasibility in terms of acceptability by professionals, assessed by the Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use questionnaire and further explored in two focus groups, as well as fidelity. Results A total of 56 patients were monitored and in 80.5% (n = 536) of nurses’ work shifts the trends assessments were documented. All deviating trends (n = 17) were recognized in time. Professionals (N = 46) considered continuous monitoring satisfying (4.8±1.0 on a 1–7 Likert-scale) and were willing to use the technology. Although insight into vital sign trends allowed faster anticipation and action upon changed patient status, professionals were neutral about usefulness (4.4±1.0). They found continuous monitoring easy to use (4.7±0.8) and easy to learn (5.3±1.0) but indicated the need for gaining practical experience. Nurses considered the use of alarms for deviating vital signs unnecessary, when trends were regularly assessed and reported. Conclusion We demonstrated that continuous vital signs trend monitoring without using alarms was feasible in the general ward setting, thereby avoiding unnecessary alarms and preventing alarm fatigue. When monitoring in a general ward setting, the standard use of alarms may therefore be reconsidered.
Collapse
|
8
|
Remote Monitoring of Chronic Critically Ill Patients after Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11041010. [PMID: 35207287 PMCID: PMC8879658 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11041010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Over the past few decades, critical care has seen many advancements. These advancements resulted in a considerable increase in the prevalence of chronically critically ill patients requiring prolonged medical care, which led to a massive increase in healthcare utilization. Methods: We performed a search for suitable articles using PubMed and Google Scholar from the inception of these databases to 15 May 2021. Results: Thirty-four articles were included in the review and analyzed. We described the following characteristics and problems with chronic critically ill patient management: the patient population, remote monitoring, the monitoring of physiological parameters in chronic critically ill patients, the anatomical location of sensors, the barriers to implementation, and the main technology-related issues. The main challenges in the management of these patients are (1) the shortage of caretakers, (2) the periodicity of vital function monitoring (e.g., episodic measuring of blood pressure leads to missing important critical events such as hypertension, hypotension, and hypoxia), and (3) failure to catch and manage critical physiological events at the right time, which can result in poor outcomes. Conclusions: The prevalence of critically ill patients is expected to grow. Technical solutions can greatly assist medical personnel and caregivers. Wearable devices can be used to monitor blood pressure, heart rate, pulse, respiratory rate, blood oxygen saturation, metabolism, and central nervous system function. The most important points that should be addressed in future studies are the performance of the remote monitoring systems, safety, clinical and economic outcomes, as well as the acceptance of the devices by patients, caretakers, and healthcare professionals.
Collapse
|
9
|
Huh KY, Jeong SI, Yoo H, Piao M, Ryu H, Kim H, Yoon YR, Seong SJ, Lee S, Kim KH. Lessons from a multicenter clinical trial with an approved wearable electrocardiogram: issues and practical considerations. Transl Clin Pharmacol 2022; 30:87-98. [PMID: 35800668 PMCID: PMC9253449 DOI: 10.12793/tcp.2022.30.e7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Although wearable electrocardiograms (ECGs) are being increasingly applied in clinical settings, validation methods have not been standardized. As an exploratory evaluation, we performed a multicenter clinical trial implementing an approved wearable patch ECG. Healthy male adults were enrolled in 2 study centers. The approved ECGs were deployed for 6 hours, and pulse rates were measured independently with conventional pulse oximetry at selected time points for correlation analyses. The transmission status of the data was evaluated by heart rates and classified into valid, invalid, and missing. A total of 55 subjects (40 in center 1 and 15 in center 2) completed the study. Overall, 77.40% of heart rates were within the valid range. Invalid and missing data accounted for 1.42% and 21.23%, respectively. There were significant differences in valid and missing data between centers. The proportion of missing data in center 1 (24.77%) was more than twice center 2 (11.77%). Heart rates measured by the wearable ECG and conventional pulse oximetry showed a poor correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.0454). In conclusion, we evaluated the multicenter feasibility of implementing wearable ECGs. The results suggest that systems to mitigate multicenter discrepancies and remove artifacts should be implemented prior to performing a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Young Huh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Sae Im Jeong
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Hyounggyoon Yoo
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea
| | - Meihua Piao
- Office of Hospital Information, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Hyeongju Ryu
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Heejin Kim
- Clinical Trials Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Young-Ran Yoon
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Sook Jin Seong
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - SeungHwan Lee
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kant N, Peters GM, Voorthuis BJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Koning MV, Witteman BPL, Rinia-Feenstra M, Doggen CJM. Continuous vital sign monitoring using a wearable patch sensor in obese patients: a validation study in a clinical setting. J Clin Monit Comput 2021; 36:1449-1459. [PMID: 34878613 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00785-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Our aim was to determine the agreement of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) measurements by the Philips Biosensor with a reference monitor (General Electric Carescape B650) in severely obese patients during and after bariatric surgery. Additionally, sensor reliability was assessed. Ninety-four severely obese patients were monitored with both the Biosensor and reference monitor during and after bariatric surgery. Agreement was defined as the mean absolute difference between both monitoring devices. Bland Altman plots and Clarke Error Grid analysis (CEG) were used to visualise differences. Sensor reliability was reflected by the amount, duration and causes of data loss. The mean absolute difference for HR was 1.26 beats per minute (bpm) (SD 0.84) during surgery and 1.84 bpm (SD 1.22) during recovery, and never exceeded the 8 bpm limit of agreement. The mean absolute difference for RR was 1.78 breaths per minute (brpm) (SD 1.90) during surgery and 4.24 brpm (SD 2.75) during recovery. The Biosensor's RR measurements exceeded the 2 brpm limit of agreement in 58% of the compared measurements. Averaging 15 min of measurements for both devices improved agreement. CEG showed that 99% of averaged RR measurements resulted in adequate treatment. Data loss was limited to 4.5% of the total duration of measurements for RR. No clear causes for data loss were found. The Biosensor is suitable for remote monitoring of HR, but not RR in morbidly obese patients. Future research should focus on improving RR measurements, the interpretation of continuous data, and development of smart alarm systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Kant
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Guido M Peters
- Scientific Bureau, Rijnstate Hospital, Rijnstate Research Center, Wagnerlaan 55, PO Box 9555, 6800 TA, Arnhem, The Netherlands.,Technical Medical Centre, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Brenda J Voorthuis
- Technical Medical Centre, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark V Koning
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Myra Rinia-Feenstra
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Carine J M Doggen
- Scientific Bureau, Rijnstate Hospital, Rijnstate Research Center, Wagnerlaan 55, PO Box 9555, 6800 TA, Arnhem, The Netherlands. .,Technical Medical Centre, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Multimodal biometric monitoring technologies drive the development of clinical assessments in the home environment. Maturitas 2021; 151:41-47. [PMID: 34446278 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Biometric monitoring technologies (BioMeTs) have attracted the attention of the health care community because of their user-friendly form factor and multi-sensor data-collection capabilities. The potential benefits of remote monitoring for collecting comprehensive, longitudinal, and contextual datasets span therapeutic areas, and both chronic and acute disease settings. Importantly, multimodal BioMeTs unlock the ability to generate rich contextual data to augment digital measures. Currently, the availability of devices is no longer the main factor limiting adoption but rather the ability to integrate fit-for-purpose BioMeTs reliably and safely into clinical care. We provide a critical review of the state of art for multimodal BioMeTs in clinical care and identify three unmet clinical needs: 1) expand the abilities of existing ambulatory unimodal BioMeTs; 2) adapt standardized clinical test protocols ("spot checks'') for use under free living conditions; and 3) develop novel applications to manage rehabilitation and chronic diseases. As the field is still in an early and quickly evolving state, we make practical recommendations: 1) to select appropriate BioMeTs; 2) to develop composite digital measures; and 3) to design interoperable software to ingest, process, delegate, and visualize the data when deploying novel clinical applications. Multimodal BioMeTs will drive the evolution from in-clinic assessments to at-home data collection with a focus on prevention, personalization, and long-term outcomes by empowering health care providers with knowledge, delivering convenience, and an improved standard of care to patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Manta C, Mahadevan N, Bakker J, Ozen Irmak S, Izmailova E, Park S, Poon JL, Shevade S, Valentine S, Vandendriessche B, Webster C, Goldsack JC. EVIDENCE Publication Checklist for Studies Evaluating Connected Sensor Technologies: Explanation and Elaboration. Digit Biomark 2021; 5:127-147. [PMID: 34179682 DOI: 10.1159/000515835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The EVIDENCE (EValuatIng connecteD sENsor teChnologiEs) checklist was developed by a multidisciplinary group of content experts convened by the Digital Medicine Society, representing the clinical sciences, data management, technology development, and biostatistics. The aim of EVIDENCE is to promote high quality reporting in studies where the primary objective is an evaluation of a digital measurement product or its constituent parts. Here we use the terms digital measurement product and connected sensor technology interchangeably to refer to tools that process data captured by mobile sensors using algorithms to generate measures of behavioral and/or physiological function. EVIDENCE is applicable to 5 types of evaluations: (1) proof of concept; (2) verification, (3) analytical validation, and (4) clinical validation as defined by the V3 framework; and (5) utility and usability assessments. Using EVIDENCE, those preparing, reading, or reviewing studies evaluating digital measurement products will be better equipped to distinguish necessary reporting requirements to drive high-quality research. With broad adoption, the EVIDENCE checklist will serve as a much-needed guide to raise the bar for quality reporting in published literature evaluating digital measurements products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Manta
- Digital Medicine Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Elektra Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nikhil Mahadevan
- Digital Medicine Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Pfizer Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessie Bakker
- Digital Medicine Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Philips, Monroeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Elena Izmailova
- Digital Medicine Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Koneksa Health Inc., New York, New York, USA
| | - Siyeon Park
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | - Benjamin Vandendriessche
- Byteflies, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Izmailova ES, Wood WA, Liu Q, Zipunnikov V, Bloomfield D, Homsy J, Hoffmann SC, Wagner JA, Menetski JP. Remote Cardiac Safety Monitoring through the Lens of the FDA Biomarker Qualification Evidentiary Criteria Framework: A Case Study Analysis. Digit Biomark 2021; 5:103-113. [PMID: 34056520 DOI: 10.1159/000515110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical safety findings remain one of the reasons for attrition of drug candidates during clinical development. Cardiovascular liabilities are not consistently detected in early-stage clinical trials and often become apparent when drugs are administered chronically for extended periods of time. Vital sign data collection outside of the clinic offers an opportunity for deeper physiological characterization of drug candidates and earlier safety signal detection. A working group representing expertise from biopharmaceutical and technology sectors, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) public-private partnerships, academia, and regulators discussed and presented a remote cardiac monitoring case study at the FNIH Biomarkers Consortium Remote Digital Monitoring for Medical Product Development workshop to examine applicability of the biomarker qualification evidentiary framework by the FDA. This use case examined the components of the framework, including the statement of need, the context of use, the state of the evidence, and the benefit/risk profile. Examination of results from 2 clinical trials deploying 510(k)-cleared devices for remote cardiac data collection demonstrated the need for analytical and clinical validity irrespectively of the regulatory status of a device of interest, emphasizing the importance of data collection method assessment in the context of intended use. Additionally, collection of large amounts of ambulatory data also highlighted the need for new statistical methods and contextual information to enable data interpretation. A wider adoption of this approach for drug development purposes will require collaborations across industry, academia, and regulatory agencies to establish methodologies and supportive data sets to enable data interpretation and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William A Wood
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Qi Liu
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Vadim Zipunnikov
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Jason Homsy
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Steven C Hoffmann
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), North Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Joseph P Menetski
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), North Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Leenen JPL, Dijkman EM, van Dijk JD, van Westreenen HL, Kalkman C, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Feasibility of continuous monitoring of vital signs in surgical patients on a general ward: an observational cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e042735. [PMID: 33597138 PMCID: PMC7893648 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine feasibility, in terms of acceptability and system fidelity, of continuous vital signs monitoring in abdominal surgery patients on a general ward. DESIGN Observational cohort study. SETTING Tertiary teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS Postoperative abdominal surgical patients (n=30) and nurses (n=23). INTERVENTIONS Patients were continuously monitored with the SensiumVitals wearable device until discharge in addition to usual care, which is intermittent Modified Early Warning Score measurements. Heart rate, respiratory rate and axillary temperature were monitored every 2 min. Values and trends were visualised and alerts sent to the nurses. OUTCOMES System fidelity was measured by analysis of the monitoring data. Acceptability by patients and nurses was assessed using questionnaires. RESULTS Thirty patients were monitored for a median duration of 81 hours (IQR 47-143) per patient, resulting in 115 217 measurements per parameter. In total, 19% (n=21 311) of heart rate, 51% (n=59 184) of respiratory rate and 9% of temperature measurements showed artefacts (n=10 269). The system algorithm sent 972 alerts (median alert rate of 4.5 per patient per day), of which 90.3% (n=878) were system alerts and 9.7% (n=94) were vital sign alerts. 35% (n=33) of vital sign alerts were true positives. 93% (n=25) of patients rated the patch as comfortable, 67% (n=18) felt safer and 89% (n=24) would like to wear it next time in the hospital. Nurses were neutral about usefulness, with a median score of 3.5 (IQR 3.1-4) on a 7-point Likert scale, ease of use 3.7 (IQR 3.2-4.8) and satisfaction 3.7 (IQR 3.2-4.8), but agreed on ease of learning at 5.0 (IQR 4.0-5.8). Neutral scores were mostly related to the perceived limited fidelity of the system. CONCLUSIONS Continuous monitoring of vital signs with a wearable device was well accepted by patients. Nurses' ratings were highly variable, resulting in on average neutral attitude towards remote monitoring. Our results suggest it is feasible to monitor vital signs continuously on general wards, although acceptability of the device among nurses needs further improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jobbe P L Leenen
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
- Connected Care Center, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Cor Kalkman
- Anesthesiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lisette Schoonhoven
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu Y, Liu C, Gao M, Wang Y, Bai Y, Xu R, Gong R. Evaluation of a wearable wireless device with artificial intelligence, iThermonitor WT705, for continuous temperature monitoring for patients in surgical wards: a prospective comparative study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039474. [PMID: 33208327 PMCID: PMC7677341 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate a new-generation, non-invasive, wireless axillary thermometer with artificial intelligence, iThermonitor (WT705, Raiing Medical, Beijing, China), and to ascertain its feasibility for perioperative continuous body temperature monitoring in surgical patients. SETTING Departments of Biliary Surgery and Operating Room and the post-anaesthesia care unit of a university teaching hospital in Chengdu, China. PARTICIPANTS A total of 526 adult surgical patients were consecutively enrolled. DESIGN This was a prospective observational study. Axillary temperatures were continuously recorded with iThermonitor throughout the whole perioperative period. The temperatures of the contralateral armpit were measured with mercury thermometers at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00 every day and were used as references. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcomes were the accuracy and precision of the temperatures measured with iThermonitor, the validity to detect fever and the feasibility of continuous wear. Pairs of temperatures were evaluated with Student's t-test, Pearson's correlation and repeated-measures Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS A total of 3621 pairs of body temperatures were obtained. The temperatures measured with iThermonitor agreed with those measured with the mercury thermometers overall, with a mean difference of 0.03°C±0.35°C and a moderate correlation (r=0.755, p<0.001). The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) ranged from -0.63°C to 0.73°C, with 5.11% of the differences outside the 95% LoA. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.753. Continuous temperature monitoring captured more fevers than intermittent observation (117/526 vs 91/526, p<0.001), detected fever up to 4.35 hours earlier, and captured a higher peak temperature (0.29°C±0.27°C, 95% CI: 0.26-0.31). All subjects felt that wearing iThermonitor was more or less comfortable and did not affect their daily activities. CONCLUSIONS iThermonitor is promising for continuous remote temperature monitoring in surgical patients. However, further developments are still needed to improve the precision of this device, especially for temperature detection in underweight patients and those with lower body temperature. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR1900024549; Results (registered on 5 July 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuwei Liu
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R.China
| | - Changqing Liu
- Operating Room of Anesthesia Surgery Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R.China
| | - Min Gao
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yangjing Bai
- Department of Cardiac and Macrovascular Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ruihua Xu
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Renrong Gong
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R.China
- Department of Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Manta C, Jain SS, Coravos A, Mendelsohn D, Izmailova ES. An Evaluation of Biometric Monitoring Technologies for Vital Signs in the Era of COVID-19. Clin Transl Sci 2020; 13:1034-1044. [PMID: 32866314 PMCID: PMC7719373 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has shifted how many patients receive outpatient care. Telehealth and remote monitoring have become more prevalent, and measurements taken in a patient's home using biometric monitoring technologies (BioMeTs) offer convenient opportunities to collect vital sign data. Healthcare providers may lack prior experience using BioMeTs in remote patient care, and, therefore, may be unfamiliar with the many versions of BioMeTs, novel data collection protocols, and context of the values collected. To make informed patient care decisions based on the biometric data collected remotely, it is important to understand the engineering solutions embedded in the products, data collection protocols, form factors (physical size and shape), data quality considerations, and availability of validation information. This article provides an overview of BioMeTs available for collecting vital signs (temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate) and discusses the strengths and limitations of continuous monitoring. We provide considerations for remote data collection and sources of validation information to guide BioMeT use in the era of COVID-19 and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Manta
- Elektra LabsBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Digital Medicine SocietyBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Sneha S. Jain
- Department of MedicineColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Andrea Coravos
- Elektra LabsBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Digital Medicine SocietyBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard‐MIT Center for Regulatory ScienceBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Dena Mendelsohn
- Elektra LabsBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Digital Medicine SocietyBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Elena S. Izmailova
- Digital Medicine SocietyBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Koneksa HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Godfrey A, Vandendriessche B, Bakker JP, Fitzer-Attas C, Gujar N, Hobbs M, Liu Q, Northcott CA, Parks V, Wood WA, Zipunnikov V, Wagner JA, Izmailova ES. Fit-for-Purpose Biometric Monitoring Technologies: Leveraging the Laboratory Biomarker Experience. Clin Transl Sci 2020; 14:62-74. [PMID: 32770726 PMCID: PMC7877826 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Biometric monitoring technologies (BioMeTs) are becoming increasingly common to aid data collection in clinical trials and practice. The state of BioMeTs, and associated digitally measured biomarkers, is highly reminiscent of the field of laboratory biomarkers 2 decades ago. In this review, we have summarized and leveraged historical perspectives, and lessons learned from laboratory biomarkers as they apply to BioMeTs. Both categories share common features, including goals and roles in biomedical research, definitions, and many elements of the biomarker qualification framework. They can also be classified based on the underlying technology, each with distinct features and performance characteristics, which require bench and human experimentation testing phases. In contrast to laboratory biomarkers, digitally measured biomarkers require prospective data collection for purposes of analytical validation in human subjects, lack well‐established and widely accepted performance characteristics, require human factor testing, and, for many applications, access to raw (sample‐level) data. Novel methods to handle large volumes of data, as well as security and data rights requirements add to the complexity of this emerging field. Our review highlights the need for a common framework with appropriate vocabulary and standardized approaches to evaluate digitally measured biomarkers, including defining performance characteristics and acceptance criteria. Additionally, the need for human factor testing drives early patient engagement during technology development. Finally, use of BioMeTs requires a relatively high degree of technology literacy among both study participants and healthcare professionals. Transparency of data generation and the need for novel analytical and statistical tools creates opportunities for precompetitive collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Godfrey
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Benjamin Vandendriessche
- Byteflies, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Ninad Gujar
- Curis Advisors, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Qi Liu
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Virginia Parks
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William A Wood
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA
| | - Vadim Zipunnikov
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Izmailova ES, Wagner JA, Ammour N, Amondikar N, Bell‐Vlasov A, Berman S, Bloomfield D, Brady LS, Cai X, Calle RA, Campbell M, Cerreta F, Clay I, Foschini L, Furlong P, Goldel R, Goldsack JS, Groenen PM, Folarin A, Heemskerk J, Honig P, Hotopf M, Kamphaus T, Karlin DR, Leptak C, Liu Q, Manji H, Mather RJ, Menetski JP, Narayan VA, Papadopoulos E, Patel B, Patrick‐Lake B, Podichetty JT, Pratap A, Servais L, Stephenson D, Tenaerts P, Tromberg BJ, Usdin S, Vasudevan S, Zipunnikov V, Hoffmann SC. Remote Digital Monitoring for Medical Product Development. Clin Transl Sci 2020. [PMCID: PMC7877824 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of digital health products has gained considerable interest as a new way to improve therapeutic research and development. Although these products are being adopted by various industries and stakeholders, their incorporation in clinical trials has been slow due to a disconnect between the promises of digital products and potential risks in using these new technologies in the absence of regulatory support. The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Biomarkers Consortium hosted a public workshop to address challenges and opportunities in this field. Important characteristics of tool development were addressed in a series of presentations, case studies, and open panel sessions. The workshop participants endorsed the usefulness of an evidentiary criteria framework, highlighted the importance of early patient engagement, and emphasized the potential impact of digital monitoring tools and precompetitive collaborations. Concerns were expressed about the lack of real‐life validation examples and the limitations of legacy standards used as a benchmark for novel tool development and validation. Participants recognized the need for novel analytical and statistical approaches to accommodate analyses of these novel data types. Future directions are to harmonize definitions to build common methodologies and foster multidisciplinary collaborations; to develop approaches toward integrating digital monitoring data with the totality of the data in clinical trials, and to continue an open dialog in the community. There was a consensus that all these efforts combined may create a paradigm shift of how clinical trials are planned, conducted, and results brought to regulatory reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nadir Ammour
- Sanofi Research & Development Chilly‐Mazarin France
| | - Ninad Amondikar
- The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research New York New York USA
| | - Andrea Bell‐Vlasov
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
| | - Steven Berman
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
| | | | - Linda S. Brady
- National Institute of Mental Health National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA
| | | | | | - Michelle Campbell
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
| | | | - Ieuan Clay
- Evidation Health San Mateo California USA
| | | | - Pat Furlong
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy Hackensack New Jersey USA
| | - Rob Goldel
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
| | | | | | | | - Jill Heemskerk
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA
| | | | | | - Tania Kamphaus
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health North Bethesda Maryland USA
| | | | - Christopher Leptak
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
| | - Qi Liu
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
| | - Husseini Manji
- Janssen Research and Development LLC Titusville New Jersey USA
| | | | - Joseph P. Menetski
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health North Bethesda Maryland USA
| | | | - Elektra Papadopoulos
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
| | - Bakul Patel
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
| | | | | | | | - Laurent Servais
- University of Liège Neuromuscular Reference Center Disease Liege Belgium
- MDUK Neuromuscular Center University of Oxford Oxford UK
| | | | - Pam Tenaerts
- Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative Durham North Carolina USA
| | - Bruce J. Tromberg
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA
| | - Steve Usdin
- BioCentury Publications Washington District of Columbia USA
| | - Srikanth Vasudevan
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA
| | - Vadim Zipunnikov
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Steven C. Hoffmann
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health North Bethesda Maryland USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Leenen JPL, Leerentveld C, van Dijk JD, van Westreenen HL, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18636. [PMID: 32469323 PMCID: PMC7351263 DOI: 10.2196/18636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous monitoring of vital signs by using wearable wireless devices may allow for timely detection of clinical deterioration in patients in general wards in comparison to detection by standard intermittent vital signs measurements. A large number of studies on many different wearable devices have been reported in recent years, but a systematic review is not yet available to date. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review for health care professionals regarding the current evidence about the validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs of wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs. METHODS A systematic and comprehensive search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2009 to September 2019 for studies that evaluated wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs in adults. Outcomes were structured by validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs. Risk of bias was determined by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2nd edition, or quality of health economic studies tool. RESULTS In this review, 27 studies evaluating 13 different wearable wireless devices were included. These studies predominantly evaluated the validation or the feasibility outcomes of these devices. Only a few studies reported the clinical outcomes with these devices and they did not report a significantly better clinical outcome than the standard tools used for measuring vital signs. Cost outcomes were not reported in any study. The quality of the included studies was predominantly rated as low or moderate. CONCLUSIONS Wearable wireless continuous monitoring devices are mostly still in the clinical validation and feasibility testing phases. To date, there are no high quality large well-controlled studies of wearable wireless devices available that show a significant clinical benefit or cost-effectiveness. Such studies are needed to help health care professionals and administrators in their decision making regarding implementation of these devices on a large scale in clinical practice or in-home monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lisette Schoonhoven
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Haga SB. Toward digital-based interventions for medication adherence and safety. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:735-746. [DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1764935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne B Haga
- Duke School of Medicine, Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mehta N, Wang J, Wang Y, Zhu H, Liu Q. The Use of Mobile Technology in Drug Development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 108:706-709. [PMID: 32215920 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Mehta
- Office of Drug Evaluation IV, Center for Drug Evaluation Research, US Food Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Jian Wang
- Office of Drug Evaluation IV, Center for Drug Evaluation Research, US Food Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Yaning Wang
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Hao Zhu
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Qi Liu
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Coravos A, Doerr M, Goldsack J, Manta C, Shervey M, Woods B, Wood WA. Modernizing and designing evaluation frameworks for connected sensor technologies in medicine. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3:37. [PMID: 32195372 PMCID: PMC7070075 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-0237-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This manuscript is focused on the use of connected sensor technologies, including wearables and other biosensors, for a wide range of health services, such as collecting digital endpoints in clinical trials and remotely monitoring patients in clinical care. The adoption of these technologies poses five risks that currently exceed our abilities to evaluate and secure these products: (1) validation, (2) security practices, (3) data rights and governance, (4) utility and usability; and (5) economic feasibility. In this manuscript we conduct a landscape analysis of emerging evaluation frameworks developed to better manage these risks, broadly in digital health. We then propose a framework specifically for connected sensor technologies. We provide a pragmatic guide for how to put this evaluation framework into practice, taking lessons from concepts in drug and nutrition labels to craft a connected sensor technology label.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Coravos
- Elektra Labs, Boston, MA USA
- Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Boston, MA USA
- Digital Medicine Society (DiMe), Boston, MA USA
- Biohacking Village, Washington, DC USA
| | | | | | - Christine Manta
- Elektra Labs, Boston, MA USA
- Digital Medicine Society (DiMe), Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Beau Woods
- Biohacking Village, Washington, DC USA
- I Am The Cavalry, Washington, DC USA
- Atlantic Council, Washington, DC USA
| | - William A. Wood
- Digital Medicine Society (DiMe), Boston, MA USA
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Izmailova ES, McLean IL, Hather G, Merberg D, Homsy J, Cantor M, Volfson D, Bhatia G, Perakslis ED, Benko C, Wagner JA. Continuous Monitoring Using a Wearable Device Detects Activity-Induced Heart Rate Changes After Administration of Amphetamine. Clin Transl Sci 2019; 12:677-686. [PMID: 31365190 PMCID: PMC6853263 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Wearable digital devices offer potential advantages over traditional methods for the collection of health-related information, including continuous collection of dense data while study subjects are ambulatory or in remote settings. We assessed the utility of collecting continuous actigraphy and cardiac monitoring by deploying two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k)-cleared devices in a phase I clinical trial of a novel compound, which included the use of an amphetamine challenge. The Phillips Actiwatch Spectrum Pro (Actiwatch) was used to assess mobility and sleep. The Preventice BodyGuardian (BodyGuardian) was used for monitoring heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR), via single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings, together with physical activity. We measured data collection rates, compared device readouts with conventional measures, and monitored changes in HR measures during the amphetamine challenge. Completeness of data collection was good for the Actiwatch (96%) and lower for the BodyGuardian (80%). A good correlation was observed between device and in-clinic measures for HR (r = 0.99; P < 0.001), but was poor for RR (r = 0.39; P = 0.004). Manual reviews of selected ECG strips corresponding to HR measures below, within, and above the normal range were consistent with BodyGuardian measurements. The BodyGuardian device detected clear HR responses after amphetamine administration while subjects were physically active, whereas conventional measures collected at predefined timepoints while subjects were resting and supine did not. Wearable digital technology shows promise for monitoring human subjects for physiologic changes and pharmacologic responses, although fit-for-purpose evaluation and validation continues to be important prior to the wider deployment of these devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian L. McLean
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | - Greg Hather
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | - David Merberg
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jason Homsy
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Dmitri Volfson
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | | | - John A. Wagner
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|