IL-36α and IL-36γ expressions in the differential diagnosis of palmoplantar psoriasis and palmoplantar eczema: A retrospective histopathologic and immunohistochemical study

Atypical plaque psoriasis: a clinicopathological study of 20 cases

BACKGROUND

Plaque psoriasis is relatively straightforward to identify. When diagnostic concerns arise in atypical cases, a biopsy is needed. It is widely accepted that the Munro microabscess and the spongiform pustule of Kogoj are diagnostic pathological features. However, the diagnostic dilemma is likely to arise in cases without these specific pathological changes and typical clinical features. This study aimed to investigate clinical and pathological clues in distinguishing atypical plaque psoriasis from its mimics.

METHODS

We evaluated the clinicopathological features of 20 cases of atypical plaque psoriasis and 40 cases of psoriasis mimics as controls including pityriasis rosea (n = 10), pityriasis lichenoides chronica (n = 8), and subacute dermatitis (n = 22).

RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with atypical plaque psoriasis and controls was performed. Pathologically, there were significant differences between the two groups in the types of parakeratosis (P = 0.046), epidermal capture of extravasated erythrocytes (P = 0.011), focal basal liquefied degeneration (P = 0.017), types of inflammatory cells (P = 0.000), and depth of inflammation (P = 0.000). Clinically, we found the presence of scales and crusts was significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study offers insight into the clinicopathological features of atypical plaque psoriasis. These differential diagnostic features, compared with its mimics, are proposed to assist the clinician in the diagnosis and treatment of atypical plaque psoriasis.

Utility of IL-36 immunostaining in distinguishing psoriasis from pityriasis rosea and pityriasis lichenoides

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease driven by upregulation of cytokines in the Th17 pathway, including interleukin-36 (IL-36). Previous studies have highlighted the utility of IL-36 immunostaining for psoriasis compared to spongiotic dermatitis and other psoriasiform dermatoses; however, no study has examined the role of IL-36 staining in distinguishing psoriasis from pityriasis rosea (PR) and pityriasis lichenoides (PL), known histologic mimickers of psoriasis.

METHODS

We compared the immunostaining pattern of IL-36 for 21 PR cases, 22 PL cases, and 10 psoriasis cases. We graded the immunostaining as 0, negative; 1, focal weak; 2, diffuse weak; 3, focal, strong; or 4, diffuse strong. We further categorized stains as negative (0-2 score) or positive (3-4 score) and utilized Fisher's exact test to compare the immunostaining pattern of these entities.

RESULTS

All psoriasis specimens were positive for IL-36, whereas all PR specimens were negative (p = 0.00000002). Twenty PL specimens were negative (p = 0.000001). Nine of 10 pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta cases were negative (p = 0.00012), and 11 of 12 cases of pityriasis lichenoides chronica were negative (p = 0.00003).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the potential role of IL-36 immunostaining in distinguishing psoriasis from other psoriasiform dermatoses, including PR and PL.

Cytokines in psoriasis: From pathogenesis to targeted therapy

Psoriasis is a multifactorial disease that affects 0.84% of the global population and it can be associated with disabling comorbidities. As patients present with thick scaly lesions, psoriasis was long believed to be a disorder of keratinocytes. Psoriasis is now understood to be the outcome of the interaction between immunological and environmental factors in individuals with genetic predisposition. While it was initially thought to be solely mediated by cytokines of type-1 immunity, namely interferon-γ, interleukin-2, and interleukin-12 because it responds very well to cyclosporine, a reversible IL-2 inhibitor; the discovery of Th-17 cells advanced the understanding of the disease and helped the development of biological therapy. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the role of cytokines in psoriasis, highlighting areas of controversy and identifying the connection between cytokine imbalance and disease manifestations. It also presents the approved targeted treatments for psoriasis and those currently under investigation.

Emerging Role of the IL-36/IL-36R Axis in Multiple Inflammatory Skin Diseases

IL-36 is a most recent member of the IL-1 cytokine family, primarily expressed at barrier sites of the body such as the skin, lungs, and intestine. It plays a vital role in inflammation and is implicated in the development of various cutaneous; intestinal; and pulmonary disorders, including psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. IL-36 comprises 4 isoforms: the proinflammatory IL-36α, IL-36β, and IL-36γ and the anti-inflammatory IL-36R antagonist. An imbalance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory IL-36 isoforms can contribute to the inflammatory fate of cells and tissues. IL-36 cytokines signal through an IL-36R heterodimer mediating their function through canonical signaling cacade, including the NF-B pathway. Prominent for its role in psoriasis, IL-36 has recently been associated with disease mechanisms in atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, neutrophilic dermatoses, autoimmune blistering disease, and Netherton syndrome. The major cutaneous source of IL-36 cytokines is keratinocytes, pointing to its role in the communication between the epidermis, innate (neutrophils, dendritic cells) immune system, and adaptive (T helper [Th]1 cells, Th17) immune system. Thus, cutaneous IL-36 signaling is crucial for the immunopathological outcome of various skin diseases. Consequently, the IL-36/IL-36R axis has recently been recognized as a promising drug target for the treatment of inflammatory disorders beyond psoriasis. This review summarizes the current update on IL-36 cytokines in inflammatory skin diseases.

IL17A mRNA Staining Distinguishes Palmoplantar Psoriasis from Hyperkeratotic Palmoplantar Eczema in Diagnostic Skin Biopsies

Acral dermatoses, including hyperkeratotic palmoplantar eczema (HPE), palmoplantar psoriasis (PP), and mycosis fungoides palmaris et plantaris (MFPP), can be challenging to diagnose clinically and histopathologically. In this setting, cytokine biomarkers may be able to help provide diagnostic clarity. Therefore, we evaluated IL-17A, IFN-γ, and IL-13 expression in PP, HPE, and MFPP and compared their expression profiles with nonacral sites. We used biopsy specimens from the Yale Dermatopathology database, selecting cases of HPE (n = 12), PP (n = 8), MFPP (n = 8), normal acral skin (n = 9), nonacral eczema (n = 10), and nonacral psoriasis (n = 10) with classic clinical and histopathologic features. IL17A mRNA expression by RNA in situ hybridization differentiated PP (median score 63.1 [interquartile range 9.4-104.1]) from HPE (0.8 [0-6.0]; P = 0.003), MFPP (0.6 [0-2.6]; P = 0.003), and normal acral skin (0 [0-0]; P < 0.001). Unexpectedly, both PP and HPE showed co-expression of IFNG and IL13 mRNA. In contrast, nonacral psoriasis and eczema showed divergent patterns of IFNG and IL13 mRNA expression. Taken together, we show that IL17A mRNA expression may be a useful biomarker of PP, and we further show that acral dermatoses exhibit distinct immunology compared to nonacral sites, with implications for clinical management.