Management of cytological material, pre-analytical procedures and bio-banking in effusion cytopathology

Immunotherapy and lung cytopathology: Overview and possibilities

Immunotherapy has become a promising cancer treatment in the past decade, and IHC is the most commonly used testing method for PDL-1/PD1 evaluation. In general, PD-L1 assays can be performed on both FFPE specimens and cytological samples. However, their use on smears is not yet well-established or validated. Nowadays, digital images and advanced algorithms can aid in interpreting PD-L1 in cytological samples. Understanding the immune environment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is critical in developing successful anticancer immunotherapies. The use of a multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF) assay on cytological samples obtained through minimally invasive methods appears to be a viable option for investigating the immune environment of NSCLC. This review aims to briefly summarize the knowledge of the role of cytopathology in the analysis of PD-L1 by immunocytochemistry (ICC) and future directions of cytopathology in the immunotherapy setting.

Expression of EGFR, PD-L1, and the mismatch repair proteins before and following therapy in malignant serous effusions with metastatic high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma

AIM

To compare the immunochemical expression of EGFR, PD-L1, and the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 between matched malignant effusions obtained before and following the administration of chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma (HGSC).

METHODS

In the enrolled HGSCs, matched formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded cell blocks (CBs) from effusions sampled before (treatment-naïve patients) and during recurrence (following chemotherapy administration), in addition to their matched HGSC tissues obtained from the ovaries at initial diagnosis (treatment-naïve patients), were subjected to EGFR, PD-L1, and MMR immunochemical analysis.

RESULTS

EGFR was more often overexpressed in effusions obtained after chemotherapy administration compared to both effusions (100% vs. 57.1%) and their matched tubo-ovarian tumors (100% vs. 7.1%) from treatment-naïve patients, respectively. EGFR immunochemistry was concordant in just 9.1% of the effusions sampled during recurrence and their paired ovarian samples before recurrence. Whereas all HGSC treatment-naïve samples (ovarian lesions and effusions) were PD-L1 negative, 3/11 (27.3%) malignant effusions obtained during recurrence showed PD-L1 overexpression. Lastly, none of the tested HGSC samples exhibited MMR deficiency.

CONCLUSION

Measuring biomarkers using CBs from malignant effusions may provide clinicians with significant information related to HGSC prognosis and therapy selection, especially in patients with resistance to chemotherapy.

Discrepancies in Hormone Receptor and HER2 Expression between Malignant Serous Effusions and Paired Tissues from Primary or Recurrent Breast Cancers

INTRODUCTION

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) biomarkers has prognostic and therapeutic value in breast cancer. This study aimed to compare the expression of ER, PR, and HER2 between paired malignant effusions and tissue samples of breast cancer.

METHODS

Our electronic archive was searched for all effusions diagnosed as breast carcinomas within a pre-defined period (January 2018-October 2021). Next, their cell blocks (CBs) were subjected to ER, PR, HER2 IHC, or in situ hybridization, in addition to EGFR IHC. The expression of hormone receptors (HRs) and HER2 was subsequently compared between tissue and effusion cytology samples derived from the same patients.

RESULTS

Only 2/76 (2.6%) of the breast cancer patients analyzed showed a malignant effusion at their initial presentation. ER, PR, and HER2 discordance rates between paired malignant effusions and tissue samples obtained at initial diagnosis were 24.3% (17/73), 40.8% (29/71), and 9.1% (6/66), respectively. The HR-/HER2- status was found more often at effusions compared to paired tissue biopsies obtained at initial diagnosis (30/70 vs. 17/70; p < 0.001). In addition, the HR-/HER2- status was significantly associated with an earlier development of a malignant effusion, when found at initial diagnosis (p < 0.001; log-rank test), first recurrence/metastasis (either solid or effusion) (p = 0.012; log-rank test), effusion samples (p = 0.007; log-rank test), and any tumor sample obtained (p = 0.009; log-rank test). Lastly, EGFR overexpression in the HR-/HER2- effusion samples was significantly associated with a shorter post-effusion survival (p = 0.019; log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

Serous effusion cytology provides high-quality material for ancillary techniques, especially when CBs are prepared, reflecting cancer heterogeneity.

Optimal isolation of extracellular vesicles from pleural fluid and profiling of their microRNA cargo

Pleural effusion occurs in both benign and malignant pleural disease. In malignant pleural effusions, the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of pleural fluid cytology is less than perfect, particularly for the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma, but also in some cases for the diagnosis of metastatic pleural malignancy with primary cancer in the lung, breast or other sites. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) carry an enriched cargo of microRNAs (miRNAs) which are selectively packaged and differentially expressed in pleural disease states. To investigate the diagnostic potential of miRNA cargo in pleural fluid extracellular vesicles (PFEVs), we evaluated methods for isolating the extracellular vesicle (EV) fraction including combinations of ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) and ultrafiltration (10 kDa filter unit). PFEVs were characterized by total and EV-associated protein, nanoparticle tracking analysis and visualisation by transmission electron microscopy. miRNA expression was analyzed by Nanostring nCounter® in separate EV fractions isolated from pleural fluid with or without additional RNA purification by ultrafiltration (3 kDa filter unit). Optimal PFEV yield, purity and miRNA expression were observed when PFEV were isolated from a larger volume of pleural fluid processed through combined ultracentrifugation and SEC techniques. Purification of total RNA by ultrafiltration further enhanced the detectability of PFEV miRNAs. This study demonstrates the feasibility of isolating PFEVs, and the potential to examine PFEV miRNA cargo using Nanostring technology to discover disease biomarkers.

Risk of malignancy assessment of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology: Experience in a community hospital setting and comparison with other studies

BACKGROUND

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) was published recently to provide standard reporting terminology for serous fluid. To date, several ISRSFC reclassification studies have reported a wide range of diagnostic category frequency and the associated risk of malignancy (ROM). Herein, the authors applied the ISRSFC to report pleural and peritoneal effusions retrospectively in a community hospital setting.

METHODS

With Internal Review Board approval, 446 peritoneal effusion specimens and 299 pleural fluid specimens from 576 patients in three community hospitals over a 12-month period were reviewed and reclassified according to the ISRSFC.

RESULTS

After reclassification, in pleural effusions, 18 (5.0%) were nondiagnostic (ND), 273 (76.0%) were negative for malignancy (NFM), 18 (5.0%) were atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 6 (1.7%) were suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 44 (12.3%) were malignant (MAL). In peritoneal effusions, after reclassification, 11 (5.5%) were ND, 168 (77.1%) were NFM, 9 (4.1%) were AUS, 2 (0.9%) were SFM, and 27 (12.4%) were MAL. The calculated ROM was 0.0% for ND, 1.8% for NFM, 37.5% for AUS, 83.3% for SFM, and 100.0% for MAL in peritoneal effusions; and the ROM was 8.3% for ND, 1.2% for NFM, 44.4% for AUS, and 100.0% for both SFM and MAL in pleural effusions. Further analysis demonstrated notable heterogeneity among published ISRSFC reclassification studies, although the overall ROMs did not differ significantly from the ISRSFC-determined ROMs (all p values were > .05 for mean ROM comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggested the necessity for each laboratory to perform its own ROM analysis based on its statistics for ISRSFC-tiered classification terminology.

Characteristics of Genomic Alterations in Pericardial Effusion of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: The feasibility and value of pericardial effusion as a liquid biopsy sample for actionable alteration detection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been adequately investigated. Here, we aim to reveal genomic alterations between pericardial effusion and paired tumor tissue, plasma (plasma cfDNA), and pleural effusion supernatant (PE-cfDNA) based on second-generation sequencing technology.

Material and methods: A total of 26 advanced NSCLC patients were retrospectively studied. The following samples were collected and sequenced using two targeted next-generation sequencing panels: pericardial effusion (n = 26), matched tumor tissue (n = 6), plasma (n = 16), and pleural effusion supernatant (n = 5).

Results: A total of 10 actionable alterations were identified in pericardial effusion of the NSCLC patients, including MET amplification, EGFR L858R, EGFR T790M, EGFR exon 19 deletion, EGFR L861Q, KRAS G12C, EML4-ALK (exon 18: exon 20) fusion, EML4-ALK (exon 20: exon 20) fusion, EML4-ALK (exon 6: exon 20) fusion, and ERBB2 exon 20 insertion. All these actionable alterations harbored multiple drug-sensitive targets as well as several drug-resistant targets, such as EGFR T790M. Compared to plasma cfDNA of 16 patients, paired pericardial effusion had higher number of actionable alterations (p = 0.08) as well as higher percentage of the population with actionable alterations (p = 0.16). Moreover, 8 out of 10 actionable alterations with single nucleotide variations (SNVs) or insertions/deletions (indels) had a higher variant allele frequency (VAF) in pericardial effusion than plasma cfDNA. In addition, we identified two actionable alterations in paired pericardial effusion, which were absence in PE-cfDNA. Clearly, 2 out of 3 actionable alterations with SNVs/indels in pericardial effusion had a higher VAF than those in PE-cfDNA. Our finding suggested the importance of pericardial effusion in the optimal selection of patients for targeted therapy.

Conclusion: Among liquid biopsy specimens from the advanced NSCLC patients, pericardial effusion may be a better candidate for genomic profiling than plasma cfDNA, while it could serve as a supplement to PE-cfDNA in detecting actionable alterations. Therefore, pericardial effusion might provide a new alternative for selection of patients for better treatment management.

[Cytology of body cavity fluids - established methods and new developments]

BACKGROUND

Body cavity fluids are among the most frequently examined samples in cytology. Cytomorphology is supplemented by additive testing. An international system of terminology and classification has been recently presented.

OBJECTIVES

Cytopreparation and staining techniques as well as some exemplary morphological patterns are presented. "The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology" (TIS) is briefly presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, and ascites: special technical issues, immunocytochemistry, molecular diagnostics, and reporting system issues are discussed.

RESULTS

Body cavity fluids are important samples that provide significant information. Additive testing is established for routine use. The form and structure of reports is widely divergent in practical use.

DISCUSSION

A reporting system for serous fluid cytopathology that is easily applied and recognized internationally is highly desirable. TIS is a valuable approach to this goal.

Biomarkers expression among paired serous ovarian cancer primary lesions and their peritoneal cavity metastases in treatment-naïve patients: A single-center study

Background

High‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), the most common histologic subtype of ovarian epithelial cancer, is associated with treatment resistance, enhanced recurrence rates, and poor prognosis. HGSOCs often metastasize to the peritoneal cavity, while fluid cytology examination could identify such metastases. This retrospective study aimed to identify potential biomarker discrepancies between paired HGSOC primary tissues and metastatic peritoneal fluid cytology samples, processed as cell blocks (CBs).

Methods

Twenty‐four pairs of formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded primary tissues and metastatic CBs from an equal number of treatment‐naïve patients were used, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor, programmed cell death‐1 ligand 1 (PD‐L1), and CD147 was applied.

Results

13/24 pairs showed discordant EGFR IHC results; in all these 13 patients, EGFR was positive (≥1+ membranous staining intensity found in at least 10% of the cancer cells) in the peritoneal, yet negative in the primary tissue samples. Notably, EGFR IHC was positive in 15/24 of the metastatic, whereas in just 2/24 of the primary HGSOC samples (p < 0.001). Although most PD‐L1 results were concordant, 5/24 and 6/24 pairs exhibited discordant results when stained with the E1L3N and 22C3 clones, respectively. Lastly, CD147 overexpression was found more often in the metastatic rather than the matched primary HGSOCs stained with CD147, though the difference was not significant.

Conclusions

Cytology from effusions could be considered for biomarker testing when present, even when tissue from the primary cancer is also available and adequately cellular, as it could provide additional information of potential clinical significance.

Cytologic Investigations for the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: State-of-the-art Review for Pulmonologists

Lung cancer is the current leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and malignant pleural effusion, an indicator of the advanced stage of this disease, portends a poor prognosis. Thus, making an accurate diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion is of paramount importance. During the past decade, the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer has improved substantially, especially in those treated with targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The use of pleural fluid cytology should not only provide diagnoses but also aid in the selection of targeted therapies, especially when obtaining a histologic specimen is too difficult. In this evidence-based review, we address the importance of pleural fluid cytology in non-small cell lung cancer patients, from making the diagnosis to making treatment-related decisions when only pleural fluid is available.

Cellular composition research of serous pleural effusion fluids. Conceptual issues of preanalytics

The purpose of this work was to show the effectiveness of the cytological method on a small number of observations, excluding all possible errors of the preanalytical stage. The paper presents several simple and easily reproducible algorithms for the cytological study of serous pleural effusions with small cellular content. On the example of 20 observations of the study of the cellular composition of serous exudates, a direct dependence of the research results on the preanalytical stage is shown. A complete study of effusion fluids in compliance with all stages of preanalytics and the use of modern methods of cytological diagnostics makes it possible to nullify the options for false-negative.

Molecular Profiling of Malignant Pleural Effusions with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Evidence that Supports Its Role in Cancer Management

Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) often develop in advanced cancer patients and confer significant morbidity and mortality. In this review, we evaluated whether molecular profiling of MPEs with next generation sequencing (NGS) could have a role in cancer management, focusing on lung cancer. We reviewed and compared the diagnostic performance of pleural fluid liquid biopsy with other types of samples. When applied in MPEs, NGS may have comparable performance with corresponding tissue biopsies, yield higher DNA amount, and detect more genetic aberrations than blood-derived liquid biopsies. NGS in MPEs may also be preferable to plasma liquid biopsy in advanced cancer patients with a MPE and a paucicellular or it could be difficult to obtain tissue/fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Of interest, post-centrifuge supernatant NGS may exhibit superior results compared to cell pellet, cell block or other materials. NGS in MPEs can also guide clinicians in tailoring established therapies and identifying therapy resistance. Evidence is still premature regarding the role of NGS in MPEs from patients with cancers other than lung. We concluded that MPE processing could provide useful prognostic and theranostic information, besides its diagnostic role.

[Cytology of primary lung cancer]

BACKGROUND

In addition to histological examinations, cytological samples are also being evaluated with increasing frequency for the diagnosis of lung carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Possible applications of and techniques for cytological examinations are presented. Typical morphologies of primary lung cancer and metastatic disease are shown.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples were obtained during bronchoscopy, serous effusion fluid, and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Special technical features of the cytological samples are discussed. Cytomorphology of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma, and small-cell lung carcinoma are shown.

RESULTS

There are clear-cut diagnostic criteria for the main subtypes of primary lung carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytological examination is a valuable addition to histology for lung carcinoma diagnostics.

[Immunohistochemical and molecular pathological diagnosis of lung carcinoma]

The therapy of lung cancer has revolutionarily changed within the last 15 years. The prognosis of patients has dramatically improved due to targeted therapies, for instance tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Current recruiting studies are testing new MET-, KRAS-, ROS1-, RET- and NTRK-inhibitors. The first clinical data are promising, emphasizing that it remains a future challenge for pathologists and oncologists to keep an eye on all facets of therapy options. Today, precise lung cancer classification via immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology is crucial for the therapy and prognosis of patients. Further, new biopsy technologies lead to very small tumor tissue samples and cytological samples of high diagnostic quality. Therefore, the complexity of diagnosis needs a strategic procedure to minimize loss of tissue material. This assay gives an overview of efficient and target-orientated diagnostic procedures in consideration of current clinical trials.

Effects of the Storage Solution Type and Prolonged Storage on the Immunoreactivity of Cells

INTRODUCTION

In effusion cytology, immunocytochemistry is a useful staining approach to provide important information for diagnosis. Effusion cytology is performed not only for pleural effusions and ascites but also for peritoneal and needle washing from fine needle aspirations or instruments. Although various solutions are used for washing cytology, the effect of the solution type on immunocytochemical reactivity is not fully understood. In this study, we examined the immunocytochemical reactivity of cytological samples after storage in various solutions.

METHODS

Cell block specimens were obtained from ascites of patients with peritoneal cancer and pleural effusions of patients with diffuse malignant mesothelioma. Various solutions, including physiological saline (PS), Ringer solution, a low-molecular-weight dextran L injection, Voluven 6% solution, Mixid L injection, RPMI-1640 medium, and horse serum were added to the sediment layers of aliquots. All samples were kept at 4°C, and aliquots were subsequently processed at specific time points (0, 1, 2, 4, 7, and 14 days). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, cell block samples were prepared for immunocytochemical staining. Immunocytochemical results were analyzed for differences in the percentages of positive cells, using the effusion sample stored for 1 h as standard (100%).

RESULTS

For all solutions other than PS, the median and central 50% of values were <100% (with respect to the effusion sample as a standard) after 1 h of storage. Immunoreactivity decreased for most solutions as time progressed.

CONCLUSION

Of note, immunocytochemistry results obtained using a washing solution are different from those using an effusion sample. For cytology, when a washing solution was used or when a sample was stored for a long time, the accuracy of the immunocytochemical results was low.