Survey on the status of teledermatology in Austria

Hybrid care potential of teledermatology: The importance of linking digital and physical practice and acceptance of online services: A cross-sectional study

Background and Aims

Telemedicine, with Teledermatology, has become a central component of modern medicine. Its importance, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, underlines its potential to optimize access for dermatological needs. The study aims to assess the potential of teledermatology, understand the importance of linking digital and physical practices, and analyze the adoption of online services based on participants' demographic and experiential factors.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey was conducted among users of the telemedicine platform from July 2022 to March 2023. The platform ("OnlineDoctor") allows users to contact dermatologists for remote dermatological consultations. The survey included questions about the participants' dermatological concerns, their reasons for using teledermatology, their satisfaction with the recommendations and their willingness to continue using telemedicine in the future. Data was collected via the RedCap online platform. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were carried out.

Results

Overall, 1141 people participated in the study (mean age 44.0 years [SD 14.6], 61.4% women). Results showed that 52.7% of participants with skin conditions had not consulted a dermatologist in the previous year. Shorter waiting times and the lack of face-to-face appointments were the main reasons for using the online platform. In total, 77.6% (n = 885) of participants indicated they would use teledermatology as their first choice if they had an upcoming skin condition. Age, gender, and satisfaction with previous consultations impacted the use of teledermatology as the first choice for future skin conditions.

Conclusion

Teledermatology is characterized by various benefits, including reduced waiting times and improved accessibility to treatment. Nevertheless, the study underscores the importance of a hybrid care approach with direct interaction with the physician. Teledermatology can be transformative in meeting dermatologic needs, mainly when traditional face-to-face consultation is limited. A deep understanding of user preferences and widespread adoption of digital services can pave the way for the successful adoption of teledermatology platforms, improving healthcare accessibility and efficiency.

Rise of teledermatology in the COVID-19 era: A pan-world perspective

Objective

During the coronavirus disease pandemic, enforced restrictions prevented face-to-face consultations for patients requiring non-emergency medical treatment. In response, there was a rise in telemedical practices, such as teledermatology. This study aimed at understanding the pan-world experiences of patients and healthcare staff who adapted to teledermatology in the coronavirus disease era.

Methods

This study made use of an online survey presented to dermatology professionals using social media and WhatsApp groups. Professionals who applied teledermatology between March and June 2020 were targeted. The survey was designed to identify respondent demographics and the preferred platforms for digital consultations. The most common diagnoses and rates of referral for further evaluation were recorded. Lastly, a platform was provided for practitioners to report their own and their patient's perspectives on the advantages and operational challenges of teledermatology. Data were collated and analyzed in Microsoft Excel.

Results

In total, 653 stakeholders participated, representing countries worldwide. Facebook and WhatsApp services were the most popular mediums of digital consultation. Diagnoses of ailments, such as acne and eczema, as well as skin-related infections, were most common. Of the cases referred for biopsy, 10 patients were subsequently diagnosed with cutaneous malignancies. Practitioners and patients not only reported personal benefit from adopting teledermatology, but also reported concerns regarding data privacy and the levels of technological literacy required.

Conclusions

Teledermatology proved an innovative clinical response to unprecedented challenges. However, further policy development and technological advancement aimed at increasing the diagnostic power of digital consultations are needed to support the continuation of teledermatology in the post-pandemic world.

International Teledermatology Review

Purpose of Review

The use of teledermatology has been evolving slowly for the delivery of health care to remote and underserved populations. Improving technology and the recent COVID-19 pandemic have hastened its use internationally.

Recent Findings

Some barriers to the use of teledermatology have fallen considerably in the last year.

Summary

Teledermatology use has increased significantly in recent years in both government-sponsored and private health care systems and individual practices. There are no recognized international practice guidelines and variable use within countries. Many barriers remain to increasing the use of teledermatology.

A Framework-Driven Systematic Review of the Barriers and Facilitators to Teledermatology Implementation

Purpose of Review

Telemedicine use in dermatology, termed “teledermatology”, offers a cost-effective model to improve healthcare efficiency and access. Only a minority of dermatology practices has integrated teledermatology into their practice prior to COVID-19. A thorough understanding of the barriers and facilitators may promote teledermatology adoption. Implementation science frameworks offer theoretically driven ways to assess factors affecting teledermatology implementation. This review uses a comprehensive implementation science framework to summarize barriers and facilitators of teledermatology implementation and appraises the quality of existing research.

Recent Findings

Technological characteristics of teledermatology (e.g., user-friendliness) and factors within the outer setting (e.g., reimbursement and legal considerations) were the most commonly reported barriers. No existing studies use a comprehensive implementation framework to identify factors influencing teledermatology implementation. Many included studies have a risk of bias in at least two of the five study quality indices evaluated.

Summary

This systematic review is the first study to summarize the existing teledermatology implementation literature into well-defined constructs from a comprehensive implementation science framework. Findings suggest future studies would benefit from the use of an implementation framework to reduce study bias, improve result comprehensiveness, facilitate comparisons across studies, and produce evidence-based resolutions to implementation barriers. Tools, resources, and recommendations to facilitate the use of an implementation framework in future studies are provided.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13671-020-00323-0.