1
|
Mlambo S, Mubayiwa M, Tarusikirwa VL, Machekano H, Mvumi BM, Nyamukondiwa C. The Fall Armyworm and Larger Grain Borer Pest Invasions in Africa: Drivers, Impacts and Implications for Food Systems. BIOLOGY 2024; 13:160. [PMID: 38534430 DOI: 10.3390/biology13030160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Invasive alien species (IAS) are a major biosecurity threat affecting globalisation and the international trade of agricultural products and natural ecosystems. In recent decades, for example, field crop and postharvest grain insect pests have independently accounted for a significant decline in food quantity and quality. Nevertheless, how their interaction and cumulative effects along the ever-evolving field production to postharvest continuum contribute towards food insecurity remain scant in the literature. To address this within the context of Africa, we focus on the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), two of the most important field and postharvest IAS, respectively, that have invaded Africa. Both insect pests have shown high invasion success, managing to establish themselves in >50% of the African continent within a decade post-introduction. The successive and summative nature of field and postharvest damage by invasive insect pests on the same crop along its value chain results in exacerbated food losses. This systematic review assesses the drivers, impacts and management of the fall armyworm and larger grain borer and their effects on food systems in Africa. Interrogating these issues is important in early warning systems, holistic management of IAS, maintenance of integral food systems in Africa and the development of effective management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaw Mlambo
- Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Palapye 10071, Botswana
| | - Macdonald Mubayiwa
- Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Palapye 10071, Botswana
| | - Vimbai L Tarusikirwa
- Department of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Honest Machekano
- Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Pretoria 0028, South Africa
| | - Brighton M Mvumi
- Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, Mount Pleasant, Harare P.O. Box MP167, Zimbabwe
| | - Casper Nyamukondiwa
- Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Palapye 10071, Botswana
- Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kumschick S, Fernandez Winzer L, McCulloch-Jones EJ, Chetty D, Fried J, Govender T, Potgieter LJ, Rapetsoa MC, Richardson DM, van Velden J, Van der Colff D, Miza S, Wilson JRU. Considerations for developing and implementing a safe list for alien taxa. Bioscience 2024; 74:97-108. [PMID: 38390311 PMCID: PMC10880065 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biad118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Many species have been intentionally introduced to new regions for their benefits. Some of these alien species cause damage, others do not (or at least have not yet). There are several approaches to address this problem: prohibit taxa that will cause damage, try to limit damages while preserving benefits, or promote taxa that are safe. In the present article, we unpack the safe list approach, which we define as "a list of taxa alien to the region of interest that are considered of sufficiently low risk of invasion and impact that the taxa can be widely used without concerns of negative impacts." We discuss the potential use of safe lists in the management of biological invasions; disentangle aspects related to the purpose, development, implementation, and impact of safe lists; and provide guidance for those considering to develop and implement such lists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Kumschick
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Laura Fernandez Winzer
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Emily J McCulloch-Jones
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Duran Chetty
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Horticultural Sciences at Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jana Fried
- Centre for Agroecology, Water, and Resilience at Coventry University, Coventry, England, United Kingdom
| | - Tanushri Govender
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Luke J Potgieter
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University
- Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Toronto-Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mokgatla C Rapetsoa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science at Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa
| | - David M Richardson
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University
- Institute of Botany at the Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic
| | - Julia van Velden
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University
- Centre for Sustainability Transitions at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Dewidine Van der Colff
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Siyasanga Miza
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - John R U Wilson
- Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fenouillas P, Ah-Peng C, Amy E, Bracco I, Calichiama L, Cazal E, Gosset M, Ingrassia F, Lavergne C, Lequette B, Notter JC, Pausé JM, Payet G, Payet N, Picot F, Prolhac E, Strasberg D, Thomas H, Triolo J, Turquet V, Rouget M. A research-action process to implement priority areas for alien plant clearing on Reunion Island. Biol Invasions 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-022-02971-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
4
|
Brevé NWP, Leuven RSEW, Buijse AD, Murk AJ, Venema J, Nagelkerke LAJ. The conservation paradox of critically endangered fish species: Trading alien sturgeons versus native sturgeon reintroduction in the Rhine-Meuse river delta. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 848:157641. [PMID: 35908701 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Sturgeons rank among the most endangered vertebrates in the world. Yet, the dwindling of wild sturgeon populations stands in stark contrast to their thriving status in aquaculture. Moreover, through the exotic pet trade, sturgeons are introduced outside their natural ranges where they may compete and hybridize with native species and transmit parasites and diseases. Here, we present an in-depth inventory of alien sturgeons in the delta of the rivers Rhine and Meuse, because several countries consider reintroduction of the native, critically endangered European sturgeon (Acipenser sturio). Our study is based on (a) an inventory of the industry of sturgeon cultivation; (b) reports on spread of alien sturgeons; (c) an analysis of pathways for introduction and spread; and (d) a risk assessment using the Harmonia+ protocol. In total, 11 alien Acipenseriformes (sturgeons and paddlefishes) were traded across an intricate network of >1000 distribution points in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany. Circa 2500 alien sturgeons were reported from 53 angling ponds and 64 other lakes and ponds, whereas circa 500 alien sturgeons were reported widespread across hydrologically connected waters. Species that posed the highest risk of introduction, establishment and spread are Siberian sturgeon (A. baerii), Russian sturgeon (A. gueldenstaedtii) and Sterlet (A. ruthenus). We recommend to implement stringent trade regulations and practical solutions to prevent spread of alien sturgeons. Measures must preferably be taken at the spatial scale of river basins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels W P Brevé
- Wageningen University, Aquaculture & Fisheries Group, De Elst 1, 6708 WD Wageningen, the Netherlands; Wageningen University, Marine Animal Ecology Group, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands; Sportvisserij Nederland, Royal Dutch Angling Alliance, Leijenseweg 115, 3721 BC Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Rob S E W Leuven
- Radboud University, Research Institute for Biology and Environmental Sciences, Department of Animal Ecology and Physiology, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Netherlands Centre of Expertise on Exotic Species (NEC-E), Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Anthonie D Buijse
- Wageningen University, Aquaculture & Fisheries Group, De Elst 1, 6708 WD Wageningen, the Netherlands; DELTARES, Department of Freshwater Ecology & Water Quality, Boussinesqweg 1, 2629 HV Delft, the Netherlands
| | - AlberTinka J Murk
- Wageningen University, Marine Animal Ecology Group, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jorrit Venema
- VAART software B.V., Berkelstraat 76, 3522 ER Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leopold A J Nagelkerke
- Wageningen University, Aquaculture & Fisheries Group, De Elst 1, 6708 WD Wageningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Genomic data is missing for many highly invasive species, restricting our preparedness for escalating incursion rates. Sci Rep 2022; 12:13987. [PMID: 35977991 PMCID: PMC9385848 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17937-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological invasions drive environmental change, potentially threatening native biodiversity, human health, and global economies. Population genomics is an increasingly popular tool in invasion biology, improving accuracy and providing new insights into the genetic factors that underpin invasion success compared to research based on a small number of genetic loci. We examine the extent to which population genomic resources, including reference genomes, have been used or are available for invasive species research. We find that 82% of species on the International Union for Conservation of Nature “100 Worst Invasive Alien Species” list have been studied using some form of population genetic data, but just 32% of these species have been studied using population genomic data. Further, 55% of the list’s species lack a reference genome. With incursion rates escalating globally, understanding how genome-driven processes facilitate invasion is critical, but despite a promising trend of increasing uptake, “invasion genomics” is still in its infancy. We discuss how population genomic data can enhance our understanding of biological invasion and inform proactive detection and management of invasive species, and we call for more research that specifically targets this area.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vilizzi L, Hill JE, Piria M, Copp GH. A protocol for screening potentially invasive non-native species using Weed Risk Assessment-type decision-support tools. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 832:154966. [PMID: 35367540 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
There is increasing use worldwide of electronic decision-support tools to identify potentially invasive non-native species so as to inform policy and management decisions aimed at preventing or mitigating the environmental and socio-economic impacts of biological invasions. This study reviews the analytical approaches used to calibrate scores generated by the Weed Risk Assessment and subsequent adaptations thereof and provides a protocol for: (i) the identification of the assessor(s) who will carry out the screenings; (ii) the definition of the risk assessment area; (iii) the criteria for selection of the species for screening; and (iv) the a priori categorisation of the species into invasive or non-invasive necessary to compute the thresholds by which to distinguish between high-risk and medium-risk non-native species. This analytical approach represents an evidence-based and statistically robust means with which to inform decision-makers and stakeholders about policy and management of potentially invasive species and is expected to serve as a general reference of forthcoming screening applications of Weed Risk Assessment-type toolkits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Vilizzi
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
| | - Jeffrey E Hill
- Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Ruskin, FL 33570, USA
| | - Marina Piria
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland; University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Fisheries, Apiculture, Wildlife Management and Special Zoology, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Gordon H Copp
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland; Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK; Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, UK; Environmental & Life Sciences Graduate Programme, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saccaggi DL, Wilson JRU, Robinson AP, Terblanche JS. Arthropods on imported plant products: Volumes predict general trends while contextual details enhance predictive power. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 32:e2554. [PMID: 35114041 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Agricultural biosecurity interventions are aimed at minimizing introductions of harmful non-native organisms to new areas via agricultural trade. To prioritize such interventions, historical data on interceptions have been used to elucidate which factors determine the likelihood that a particular import is carrying a harmful organism. Here we use an interception data set of arthropod contaminants recorded on plant imports arriving in South Africa from 2005 to 2019, comprising 13,566 samples inspected for arthropod contaminants, of which 4902 were positive for the presence of at least one arthropod. We tested 29 predictor variables that have previously been used to explain variation in rates of detection and three variables describing possible sources of additional variation and grouped these into six mutually exclusive "factor classes." We used boosted regression trees as a non-parametric stochastic machine-learning method to build models for each factor class and interactions between them. We explored the influence of these variables with data split either randomly or chronologically. While we identified some specific patterns that could be explained post-hoc by historical events, only inspected volumes were reliably correlated with detection of arthropod contaminants across the whole data set. However, inspected volumes could not predict future interceptions of arthropods, which instead relied on contextual factors such as country, crop or year of import. This suggests that, although certain factors may be important in certain circumstances or for particular crops or commodities, there is little general predictive power in the current data. Instead, an idiographic approach would be most beneficial in biosecurity to ascertain the details of why a particular pest arrived on a particular pathway and how it might move (and be stopped) in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davina L Saccaggi
- Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, Plant Health Diagnostic Services, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - John R U Wilson
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Andrew P Robinson
- Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John S Terblanche
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Decision support system for fish quarantine measures in Indonesia. VINE JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 2022. [DOI: 10.1108/vjikms-08-2021-0144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
Fish quarantine is a measure to prevent the entry and spread of quarantine fish pests and diseases abroad and from one area to another within Indonesia's territory. Based on these backgrounds, this study aims to identify the knowledge, knowledge management (KM) processes and knowledge management system (KMS) priority needs for quarantine fish and other fishery products measures (QMFFP) and then develop a classification model and web-based decision support system (DSS) for QMFFP decisions.
Design/methodology/approach
This research methodology uses combination approaches, namely, contingency factor analysis (CFA), the cross-industry standard process for data mining (CRISP-DM) and knowledge management system development life cycle (KMSDLC). The CFA for KM solution design is performed by identifying KM processes and KMS priorities. The CRISP-DM for decision classification model is done by using a decision tree algorithm. The KMSDLC is used to develop a web-based DSS.
Findings
The highest priority requirements of KM technology for QMFFP are data mining and DSS with predictive features. The main finding of this study is to show that web-based DSS (functions and outputs) can support and accelerate QMFFP decisions by regulations and field practice needs. The DSS was developed using the CTree algorithm model, which has six main attributes and eight rules.
Originality/value
This study proposes a novel comprehensive framework for developing DSS (combination of CFA, CRISP-DM and KMSDLC), a novel classification model resulting from comparing two decision tree algorithms and a novel web-based DSS for QMFFP.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tarkan AS, Tricarico E, Vilizzi L, Bİlge G, Ekmekçİ FG, Filiz H, Giannetto D, İlhan A, Kİllİ N, Kirankaya ŞG, Koutsikos N, Kozic S, Kurtul I, Lazzaro L, Marchini A, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Perdikaris C, Piria M, Pompei L, Sari H, Smeti E, Stasolla G, Top N, Tsiamis K, Vardakas L, Yapici S, Yoğurtçuoğlu B, Copp GH. Risk of invasiveness of non-native aquatic species in the eastern Mediterranean region under current and projected climate conditions. THE EUROPEAN ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/24750263.2021.1980624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. S. Tarkan
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - E. Tricarico
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - L. Vilizzi
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - G. Bİlge
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
| | - F. G. Ekmekçİ
- Hydrobiology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Çankaya-Ankara, Turkey
| | - H. Filiz
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
| | - D. Giannetto
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
| | - A. İlhan
- Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey
| | - N. Kİllİ
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Ş. G. Kirankaya
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey
| | - N. Koutsikos
- Institute of Marine Biological Resources & Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Anavissos, Attica, Greece
| | - S. Kozic
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - I. Kurtul
- Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey
| | - L. Lazzaro
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - A. Marchini
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - C. Perdikaris
- Department of Fisheries, Regional Unit of Thesprotia, Epirus, Igoumenitsa, Greece
| | - M. Piria
- Department of Fisheries, Apiculture, Wildlife Management and Special Zoology, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - L. Pompei
- Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - H. Sari
- Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey
| | - E. Smeti
- Institute of Marine Biological Resources & Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Anavissos, Attica, Greece
| | | | - N. Top
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
| | - K. Tsiamis
- Institute of Marine Biological Resources & Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Anavissos, Attica, Greece
| | - L. Vardakas
- Institute of Marine Biological Resources & Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Anavissos, Attica, Greece
| | - S. Yapici
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
| | - B. Yoğurtçuoğlu
- Hydrobiology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Çankaya-Ankara, Turkey
| | - G. H. Copp
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK
- Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, UK
- Life Sciences Graduate Programme, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vilizzi L, Copp GH, Hill JE, Adamovich B, Aislabie L, Akin D, Al-Faisal AJ, Almeida D, Azmai MNA, Bakiu R, Bellati A, Bernier R, Bies JM, Bilge G, Branco P, Bui TD, Canning-Clode J, Cardoso Ramos HA, Castellanos-Galindo GA, Castro N, Chaichana R, Chainho P, Chan J, Cunico AM, Curd A, Dangchana P, Dashinov D, Davison PI, de Camargo MP, Dodd JA, Durland Donahou AL, Edsman L, Ekmekçi FG, Elphinstone-Davis J, Erős T, Evangelista C, Fenwick G, Ferincz Á, Ferreira T, Feunteun E, Filiz H, Forneck SC, Gajduchenko HS, Gama Monteiro J, Gestoso I, Giannetto D, Gilles AS, Gizzi F, Glamuzina B, Glamuzina L, Goldsmit J, Gollasch S, Goulletquer P, Grabowska J, Harmer R, Haubrock PJ, He D, Hean JW, Herczeg G, Howland KL, İlhan A, Interesova E, Jakubčinová K, Jelmert A, Johnsen SI, Kakareko T, Kanongdate K, Killi N, Kim JE, Kırankaya ŞG, Kňazovická D, Kopecký O, Kostov V, Koutsikos N, Kozic S, Kuljanishvili T, Kumar B, Kumar L, Kurita Y, Kurtul I, Lazzaro L, Lee L, Lehtiniemi M, Leonardi G, Leuven RSEW, Li S, Lipinskaya T, Liu F, Lloyd L, Lorenzoni M, Luna SA, Lyons TJ, Magellan K, Malmstrøm M, Marchini A, Marr SM, Masson G, Masson L, McKenzie CH, Memedemin D, Mendoza R, Minchin D, Miossec L, Moghaddas SD, Moshobane MC, Mumladze L, Naddafi R, Najafi-Majd E, Năstase A, Năvodaru I, Neal JW, Nienhuis S, Nimtim M, Nolan ET, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Ojaveer H, Olenin S, Olsson K, Onikura N, O'Shaughnessy K, Paganelli D, Parretti P, Patoka J, Pavia RTB, Pellitteri-Rosa D, Pelletier-Rousseau M, Peralta EM, Perdikaris C, Pietraszewski D, Piria M, Pitois S, Pompei L, Poulet N, Preda C, Puntila-Dodd R, Qashqaei AT, Radočaj T, Rahmani H, Raj S, Reeves D, Ristovska M, Rizevsky V, Robertson DR, Robertson P, Ruykys L, Saba AO, Santos JM, Sarı HM, Segurado P, Semenchenko V, Senanan W, Simard N, Simonović P, Skóra ME, Slovák Švolíková K, Smeti E, Šmídová T, Špelić I, Srėbalienė G, Stasolla G, Stebbing P, Števove B, Suresh VR, Szajbert B, Ta KAT, Tarkan AS, Tempesti J, Therriault TW, Tidbury HJ, Top-Karakuş N, Tricarico E, Troca DFA, Tsiamis K, Tuckett QM, Tutman P, Uyan U, Uzunova E, Vardakas L, Velle G, Verreycken H, Vintsek L, Wei H, Weiperth A, Weyl OLF, Winter ER, Włodarczyk R, Wood LE, Yang R, Yapıcı S, Yeo SSB, Yoğurtçuoğlu B, Yunnie ALE, Zhu Y, Zięba G, Žitňanová K, Clarke S. A global-scale screening of non-native aquatic organisms to identify potentially invasive species under current and future climate conditions. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 788:147868. [PMID: 34134389 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
The threat posed by invasive non-native species worldwide requires a global approach to identify which introduced species are likely to pose an elevated risk of impact to native species and ecosystems. To inform policy, stakeholders and management decisions on global threats to aquatic ecosystems, 195 assessors representing 120 risk assessment areas across all six inhabited continents screened 819 non-native species from 15 groups of aquatic organisms (freshwater, brackish, marine plants and animals) using the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit. This multi-lingual decision-support tool for the risk screening of aquatic organisms provides assessors with risk scores for a species under current and future climate change conditions that, following a statistically based calibration, permits the accurate classification of species into high-, medium- and low-risk categories under current and predicted climate conditions. The 1730 screenings undertaken encompassed wide geographical areas (regions, political entities, parts thereof, water bodies, river basins, lake drainage basins, and marine regions), which permitted thresholds to be identified for almost all aquatic organismal groups screened as well as for tropical, temperate and continental climate classes, and for tropical and temperate marine ecoregions. In total, 33 species were identified as posing a 'very high risk' of being or becoming invasive, and the scores of several of these species under current climate increased under future climate conditions, primarily due to their wide thermal tolerances. The risk thresholds determined for taxonomic groups and climate zones provide a basis against which area-specific or climate-based calibrated thresholds may be interpreted. In turn, the risk rankings help decision-makers identify which species require an immediate 'rapid' management action (e.g. eradication, control) to avoid or mitigate adverse impacts, which require a full risk assessment, and which are to be restricted or banned with regard to importation and/or sale as ornamental or aquarium/fishery enhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Vilizzi
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
| | - Gordon H Copp
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland; Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK; Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, UK; School of the Environment, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
| | - Jeffrey E Hill
- Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Ruskin, FL 33570, USA
| | - Boris Adamovich
- Faculty of Biology, Belarusian State University, 220030 Minsk, Belarus
| | - Luke Aislabie
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK
| | - Daniel Akin
- College of Science and Mathematics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | - Abbas J Al-Faisal
- Marine Science Centre, University of Basrah, PO Box 49, Basrah, Iraq
| | - David Almeida
- Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Básicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Pablo CEU, 28003 Madrid, Spain
| | - M N Amal Azmai
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Seri Kembangan, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Rigers Bakiu
- Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Agricultural University of Tirana, Tirana 1000, Albania; Albanian Center for Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development, Tirana 1000, Albania
| | - Adriana Bellati
- Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Renée Bernier
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Gulf Fisheries Centre, Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 5K4, Canada
| | - Jason M Bies
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
| | - Gökçen Bilge
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Paulo Branco
- Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Thuyet D Bui
- Faculty of Marine Science, Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment, 41A Phu Dien, Bac Tu Liem, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - João Canning-Clode
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação (ARDITI), 9020-105 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal; Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD 21037, USA
| | - Henrique Anatole Cardoso Ramos
- Coordination of Sustainable Use of Fisheries Resources, Department of Species Conservation, Ministry of Environment, 70068-900 Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Gustavo A Castellanos-Galindo
- Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), 28359 Bremen, Germany; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Panamá
| | - Nuno Castro
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação (ARDITI), 9020-105 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
| | - Ratcha Chaichana
- Department of Environmental Technology and Management, Faculty of Environment, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
| | - Paula Chainho
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal; Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal; Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Joleen Chan
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 117558, Singapore
| | - Almir M Cunico
- Laboratory of Ecology, Fisheries and Ichthyology, Biodiversity Department - Palotina Sector, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil
| | - Amelia Curd
- Laboratory of Coastal Benthic Ecology, French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER), 29280 Plouzané, France
| | - Punyanuch Dangchana
- Division of Research Policy and Plan, National Research Council of Thailand, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
| | - Dimitriy Dashinov
- Department of General and Applied Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University, 1164 g.k. Lozenets, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Phil I Davison
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK
| | - Mariele P de Camargo
- Laboratory of Ecology, Fisheries and Ichthyology, Biodiversity Department - Palotina Sector, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil
| | - Jennifer A Dodd
- Animal and Plant Sciences Group, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK
| | - Allison L Durland Donahou
- Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Ruskin, FL 33570, USA; Florida Southern College, Lakeland, FL 33801, USA
| | - Lennart Edsman
- Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Freshwater Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Drottningholm, Sweden
| | - F Güler Ekmekçi
- Hydrobiology section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Çankaya-Ankara 06800, Turkey
| | | | - Tibor Erős
- Centre for Ecological Research, Balaton Limnological Institute, Tihany 8237, Hungary
| | - Charlotte Evangelista
- Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Gemma Fenwick
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4YW, UK
| | - Árpád Ferincz
- Institute for Natural Resources Conservation, Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Szent István University, Gödöllő 2100, Hungary
| | - Teresa Ferreira
- Department of Natural Resources, Environment and Landscape, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Eric Feunteun
- Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire Biologie des Organismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, BOREA (MNHN, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Caen, IRD, Université de Guadeloupe Antilles), Station Marine de Dinard, CRESCO, 35800 Dinard, France
| | - Halit Filiz
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Sandra C Forneck
- Laboratory of Ecology, Fisheries and Ichthyology, Biodiversity Department - Palotina Sector, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil
| | - Helen S Gajduchenko
- Laboratory of Ichthyology, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk 220072, Belarus
| | - João Gama Monteiro
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação (ARDITI), 9020-105 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
| | - Ignacio Gestoso
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação (ARDITI), 9020-105 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal; Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD 21037, USA
| | - Daniela Giannetto
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Allan S Gilles
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, 1008, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | - Francesca Gizzi
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação (ARDITI), 9020-105 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
| | - Branko Glamuzina
- Department of Applied Ecology, University of Dubrovnik, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia
| | - Luka Glamuzina
- Department of Applied Ecology, University of Dubrovnik, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia
| | - Jesica Goldsmit
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Mont-Joli, Quebec G5H 3Z4, Canada; Arctic and Aquatic Research Division, Freshwater Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, Quebec MB R3T 2N6, Canada
| | | | - Philippe Goulletquer
- Scientific Direction, French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER), 44980 Nantes, France
| | - Joanna Grabowska
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
| | - Rogan Harmer
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK
| | - Phillip J Haubrock
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Department of River Ecology and Conservation, 63571 Gelnhausen, Germany; Nature and Environment Management Operators s.r.l., 50121 Florence, Italy; Department of Biology, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Dekui He
- The Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Jeffrey W Hean
- DST/NRF Research Chair in Inland Fisheries and Freshwater Ecology, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa; GroundTruth, Water, Wetlands and Environmental Engineering, Hilton, KwaZulu-Natal 3245, South Africa
| | - Gábor Herczeg
- Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Kimberly L Howland
- Arctic and Aquatic Research Division, Freshwater Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, Quebec MB R3T 2N6, Canada
| | - Ali İlhan
- Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Elena Interesova
- Tomsk State University, Tomsk 634050, Russia; Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia; Novosibirsk branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
| | - Katarína Jakubčinová
- Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Anders Jelmert
- Institute of Marine Research, Flødevigen Research Station, NO-7485 His, Norway
| | - Stein I Johnsen
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tomasz Kakareko
- Department of Ecology and Biogeography, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
| | - Kamalaporn Kanongdate
- Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University, Salaya 73170, Thailand
| | - Nurçin Killi
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Jeong-Eun Kim
- College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305-764, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Dominika Kňazovická
- Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Praha, Czechia
| | - Oldřich Kopecký
- Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Praha, Czechia
| | - Vasil Kostov
- Department of Fisheries, Institute of Animal Science, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje 1000, Macedonia
| | - Nicholas Koutsikos
- Institute of Marine Biological Resources & Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Anavissos, 19013, Attica, Greece
| | - Sebastian Kozic
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
| | - Tatia Kuljanishvili
- Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Praha, Czechia
| | - Biju Kumar
- Department of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695034, India
| | - Lohith Kumar
- REF Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal 700120, India
| | - Yoshihisa Kurita
- Fishery Research Laboratory, Kyushu University, Fukutsu, Fukuoka 811-3304, Japan
| | - Irmak Kurtul
- Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Lorenzo Lazzaro
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Lee
- Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7TX, England, United Kingdom
| | - Maiju Lehtiniemi
- Marine Research Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Rob S E W Leuven
- Department of Animal Ecology and Physiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University & Netherlands Centre of Expertise on Exotic Species, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Shan Li
- Natural History Research Center, Shanghai Natural History Museum, Branch of Shanghai Science & Technology Museum, Shanghai 200041, China
| | - Tatsiana Lipinskaya
- Laboratory of Hydrobiology, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk 220072, Belarus
| | - Fei Liu
- Aquatic Science Institute, Tibet Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Science, Lhasa 850009, China
| | - Lance Lloyd
- Lloyd Environmental Pty Ltd, Somers, Victoria 3927, Australia; School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria 3350, Australia
| | - Massimo Lorenzoni
- Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - Sergio Alberto Luna
- Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León 66455, Mexico
| | - Timothy J Lyons
- Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Ruskin, FL 33570, USA; New Mexico Biopark Society, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA
| | - Kit Magellan
- South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa; University of Battambang, 02360 Battambang, Cambodia
| | - Martin Malmstrøm
- Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), NO-0213 Oslo, Norway
| | - Agnese Marchini
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Sean M Marr
- DST/NRF Research Chair in Inland Fisheries and Freshwater Ecology, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa
| | - Gérard Masson
- Laboratoire interdisciplinaire des environnements continentaux, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Université de Lorraine, 57000 Metz, France
| | - Laurence Masson
- Freshwater Fish Ecology Laboratory, Ecosystem Science and Management Program, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia V2N 4Z9, Canada
| | - Cynthia H McKenzie
- Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1A 5J7, Canada
| | - Daniyar Memedemin
- Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Ovidius University of Constanta, Constanta 900527, Romania
| | - Roberto Mendoza
- Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León 66455, Mexico
| | - Dan Minchin
- Marine Organism Investigations, Marina Village, Ballina, Killaloe, Clare V94 767X, Ireland; Marine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, 92294 Klaipėda, Lithuania
| | - Laurence Miossec
- Scientific Direction, French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER), 44980 Nantes, France
| | - Seyed Daryoush Moghaddas
- Department of Biodiversity and Ecosystems Management, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, 1983963113 Tehran, Iran
| | - Moleseng C Moshobane
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Biological Invasions Directorate, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; Department of Biology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Gauteng 0208, South Africa; Young Water Professionals, South African Chapter, Limpopo 1685, South Africa
| | - Levan Mumladze
- Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia
| | - Rahmat Naddafi
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Aquatic Resources, Division of Coastal Research, SE-453 30 Oregrund, Sweden
| | - Elnaz Najafi-Majd
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ege University, 35040 Izmir, Turkey
| | - Aurel Năstase
- Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use of Natural Resources, Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea 820112, Romania
| | - Ion Năvodaru
- Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use of Natural Resources, Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea 820112, Romania
| | - J Wesley Neal
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
| | - Sarah Nienhuis
- Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario K9J 8M5, Canada
| | - Matura Nimtim
- Department of Environmental Technology and Management, Faculty of Environment, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
| | - Emma T Nolan
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Poole BH12 5BB, UK
| | - Anna Occhipinti-Ambrogi
- Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Henn Ojaveer
- University of Tartu, 80012 Pärnu, Estonia; National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Sergej Olenin
- Marine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, 92294 Klaipėda, Lithuania
| | - Karin Olsson
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK; School of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel; The Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Coral Beach, Eilat 8810302, Israel
| | - Norio Onikura
- Fishery Research Laboratory, Kyushu University, Fukutsu, Fukuoka 811-3304, Japan
| | - Kathryn O'Shaughnessy
- Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Coastal Fisheries, 4200 Smith School Rd., Austin, TX 78744, USA
| | | | - Paola Parretti
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação (ARDITI), 9020-105 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal; CIBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO Associate Laboratory and Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, University of the Azores, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - Jiří Patoka
- Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Praha, Czechia
| | - Richard Thomas B Pavia
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, 1008, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | | | | | - Elfritzson M Peralta
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, 1008, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | - Costas Perdikaris
- Department of Fisheries, Regional Unit of Thesprotia, Epirus, 46 100, Igoumenitsa, Greece
| | - Dariusz Pietraszewski
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
| | - Marina Piria
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland; Department of Fisheries, Apiculture, Wildlife Management and Special Zoology, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Sophie Pitois
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK
| | - Laura Pompei
- Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - Nicolas Poulet
- Pôle écohydraulique OFB-IMFT-P, French Agency for Biodiversity, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - Cristina Preda
- Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Ovidius University of Constanta, Constanta 900527, Romania
| | - Riikka Puntila-Dodd
- Marine Research Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Tena Radočaj
- Department of Fisheries, Apiculture, Wildlife Management and Special Zoology, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Hossein Rahmani
- Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, 4816118771, Mazandaran, Iran
| | - Smrithy Raj
- Department of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695034, India; National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore 560065, India
| | - David Reeves
- National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA
| | - Milica Ristovska
- Institute of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia
| | - Viktor Rizevsky
- Laboratory of Ichthyology, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk 220072, Belarus
| | - D Ross Robertson
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Panamá
| | - Peter Robertson
- Modelling, Evidence and Policy Group, School of Natural and Environmental Resources, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Laura Ruykys
- Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Agency, Vietnam Environment Administration, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, 10 Ton That Thuyet, Nam Tu Liem District, Hanoi, Viet Nam; Flora and Fauna Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Palmerston, Northern Territory 0828, Australia
| | - Abdulwakil O Saba
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Seri Kembangan, Selangor, Malaysia; School of Agriculture, Lagos State University, Epe Campus, 106101 Epe, Lagos State, Nigeria
| | - José M Santos
- Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Hasan M Sarı
- Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Pedro Segurado
- Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vitaliy Semenchenko
- Laboratory of Hydrobiology, Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk 220072, Belarus
| | - Wansuk Senanan
- Department of Aquatic Science, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Chon Buri 20130, Thailand
| | - Nathalie Simard
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Mont-Joli, Quebec G5H 3Z4, Canada
| | - Predrag Simonović
- Faculty of Biology & Institute for Biological Research "Siniša Stanković", University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
| | - Michał E Skóra
- University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, Institute of Oceanography, Professor Krzysztof Skóra Hel Marine Station, 84-150 Hel, Poland
| | - Kristína Slovák Švolíková
- Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Evangelia Smeti
- Institute of Marine Biological Resources & Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Anavissos, 19013, Attica, Greece
| | - Tereza Šmídová
- Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Praha, Czechia
| | - Ivan Špelić
- Department of Fisheries, Apiculture, Wildlife Management and Special Zoology, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Greta Srėbalienė
- Marine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, 92294 Klaipėda, Lithuania
| | | | - Paul Stebbing
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK; APEM Ltd, A17 Embankment, Business Park, Heaton Mersey, Manchester, Cheshire SK4 3GN, UK
| | - Barbora Števove
- Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Vettath R Suresh
- Division of Mariculture, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin, Kerala 682018, India
| | - Bettina Szajbert
- Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Kieu Anh T Ta
- Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Agency, Vietnam Environment Administration, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, 10 Ton That Thuyet, Nam Tu Liem District, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Ali Serhan Tarkan
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland; Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey
| | | | - Thomas W Therriault
- Pacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, British Columbia V9T 6N7, Canada
| | - Hannah J Tidbury
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK
| | - Nildeniz Top-Karakuş
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Elena Tricarico
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Débora F A Troca
- Institute of Oceanography, Federal University of Rio Grande, 96203-900 Rio Grande, Brazil
| | - Konstantinos Tsiamis
- Institute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Attica, Anavyssos 19013, Greece
| | - Quenton M Tuckett
- Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Ruskin, FL 33570, USA
| | - Pero Tutman
- Laboratory for Ichthyology and Coastal Fisheries, Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Umut Uyan
- Skretting Turkey, Güllük Milas, 48670, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Eliza Uzunova
- Department of General and Applied Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University, 1164 g.k. Lozenets, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Leonidas Vardakas
- Institute of Marine Biological Resources & Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Anavissos, 19013, Attica, Greece
| | - Gaute Velle
- Norwegian Research Centre, 5007 Bergen, Norway; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Hugo Verreycken
- Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), B-1630 Linkebeek, Belgium
| | - Lizaveta Vintsek
- Institute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
| | - Hui Wei
- Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou 510380, China; Key Laboratory of Recreational fisheries Research, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510380, China
| | - András Weiperth
- Institute for Natural Resources Conservation, Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Szent István University, Gödöllő 2100, Hungary
| | - Olaf L F Weyl
- Centre for Invasion Biology, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda 6139, South Africa; DST/NRF Research Chair in Inland Fisheries and Freshwater Ecology, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa
| | - Emily R Winter
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Poole BH12 5BB, UK
| | - Radosław Włodarczyk
- Department of Biodiversity Studies and Bioeducation, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
| | - Louisa E Wood
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK
| | - Ruibin Yang
- College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Sercan Yapıcı
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Menteşe, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Shayne S B Yeo
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 117558, Singapore
| | - Baran Yoğurtçuoğlu
- Hydrobiology section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Çankaya-Ankara 06800, Turkey
| | | | - Yunjie Zhu
- Aquaculture Technology Promotion Station of Nantong, Nantong, China
| | - Grzegorz Zięba
- Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
| | - Kristína Žitňanová
- Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Stacey Clarke
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dorjee, Johnson SB, Buckmaster AJ, Downey PO. Developing a hybrid weed risk assessment system for countries with open and porous borders: insights from Bhutan. Biol Invasions 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-021-02552-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Goldsmit J, McKindsey CW, Stewart DB, Howland KL. Screening for High-Risk Marine Invaders in the Hudson Bay Region, Canadian Arctic. Front Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.627497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The Canadian Arctic is receiving increased ship traffic, largely related to non-renewable resource exploitation and facilitated by climate change. This traffic, much of which arrives in ballast, increases opportunities for the spread of aquatic invasive species (AIS). One of the regions at greatest risk is the Hudson Bay Complex. A horizon scanning exercise was conducted using the semi-quantitative Canadian Marine Invasive Screening Tool (CMIST) to identify AIS of potential concern to the region. This screening-level risk assessment tool, uses documented information to answer questions related to the likelihood and impact of invasion. Species were analyzed by ecological categories (zoobenthos, zooplankton, phytobenthos) and taxonomic groups, with 14 species (out of 31) identified as being of highest relative risk. Crabs, mollusks, macrozooplankton and macroalgae were the taxonomic groups with the highest overall risk scores, through a combination of higher likelihood of invasion and impact scores relative to other taxa. Species that may pose the highest AIS risk are currently mainly distributed on the east and west coasts of the North Atlantic Ocean. Their distributions coincide with source ports and shipping pathways that are well connected to the Hudson Bay Complex. This first horizon scan to identify potential high-risk AIS for the Canadian Arctic incorporated two novel approaches into the CMIST analysis: i) use of the tool to assess two new ecological categories (phytobenthos and zooplankton), and ii) use of averaged CMIST results to interpret general risk patterns of ecological categories. This study is also the first to use CMIST scores to highlight common source regions and connected ports for the highest risk species. In a scenario of climate change and increasing ship traffic, this information can be used to support management actions such as the creation of watch lists to inform adaptive management for preventing AIS establishment, and mitigating associated environmental and economic impacts.
Collapse
|
14
|
McGrannachan CM, Pagad S, McGeoch MA. A multiregional assessment of transnational pathways of introduction. NEOBIOTA 2021. [DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.64.60642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Information on the pathways by which alien taxa are introduced to new regions is vital for prioritising policy and management responses to invasions. However, available datasets are often compiled using disparate methods, making comparison and collation of pathway data difficult. Using a standardised framework for recording and categorising pathway data can help to rectify this problem and provide the information necessary to develop indicators for reporting on alien introductions. We combine the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Pathways Categorisation Scheme (CPC) with data compiled by the Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) to report on multiregional trends on alien introduction pathways over the past 200+ years. We found a significant increase in the documented number of multiregional alien introduction events across all pathways of the CPC’s three hierarchical levels. The ‘escape’ pathway is the most common documented pathway used by alien taxa. Transport stowaways via shipping-related pathways are a rapidly increasing contribution to alien introductions. Most alien introduction events were of unknown pathway origin, highlighting the challenge of information gaps in pathway data and reiterating the need for standardised information-gathering practices. Combining the CPC framework with alien introduction pathways data will standardise pathway information and facilitate the development of global indicators of trends in alien introductions and the pathways they use. These indicators have the potential to inform policy and management strategies for preventing future biological invasions and can be downscaled to national and regional levels that are applicable across taxa and ecosystems.
Collapse
|
15
|
Shivambu TC, Shivambu N, Lyle R, Jacobs A, Kumschick S, Foord SH, Robertson MP. Tarantulas (Araneae: Theraphosidae) in the pet trade in South Africa. AFRICAN ZOOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/15627020.2020.1823879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tinyiko C Shivambu
- Centre for Invasion Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Ndivhuwo Shivambu
- Centre for Invasion Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Robin Lyle
- Biosystematics Division, Agriculture Research Council-Plant Protection Health and Protection, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Adriaana Jacobs
- Biosystematics Division, Agriculture Research Council-Plant Protection Health and Protection, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Sabrina Kumschick
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Stefan H Foord
- Department of Zoology and Centre for Invasion Biology, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa
| | - Mark P Robertson
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vimercati G, Kumschick S, Probert AF, Volery L, Bacher S. The importance of assessing positive and beneficial impacts of alien species. NEOBIOTA 2020. [DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.62.52793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Extensive literature is available on the diversity and magnitude of impacts that alien species cause on recipient systems. Alien species may decrease or increase attributes of ecosystems (e.g. total biomass or species diversity), thus causing negative and positive environmental impacts. Alien species may also negatively or positively impact attributes linked to local human communities (e.g. the number of people involved in a given activity). Ethical and societal values contribute to define these environmental and socio-economic impacts as deleterious or beneficial. Whilst most of the literature focuses on the deleterious effects of alien taxa, some recognise their beneficial impacts on ecosystems and human activities. Impact assessment frameworks show a similar tendency to evaluate mainly deleterious impacts: only relatively few, and not widely applied, frameworks incorporate the beneficial impacts of alien species. Here, we provide a summary of the frameworks assessing beneficial impacts and briefly discuss why they might have been less frequently cited and applied than frameworks assessing exclusively deleterious impacts. Then, we review arguments that invoke a greater consideration of positive and beneficial impacts caused by alien species across the invasion science literature. We collate and describe arguments from a set of 47 papers, grouping them in two categories (value-free and value-laden), which span from a theoretical, basic science perspective to an applied science perspective. We also provide example cases associated with each argument. We advocate that the development of transparent and evidence-based frameworks assessing positive and beneficial impacts might advance our scientific understanding of impact dynamics and better inform management and prioritisation decisions. We also advise that this development should be achieved by recognising the underlying ethical and societal values of the frameworks and their intrinsic limitations. The evaluation of positive and beneficial impacts through impact assessment frameworks should not be seen as an attempt to outweigh or to discount deleterious impacts of alien taxa but rather as an opportunity to provide additional information for scientists, managers and policymakers.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kumschick S, Wilson JRU, Foxcroft LC. A framework to support alien species regulation: the Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT). NEOBIOTA 2020. [DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.62.51031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Human livelihoods and well-being in almost all regions of the world depend on taxa which are alien. Such taxa also, however, threaten human health, sustainable development, and biodiversity. Since it is not feasible or desirable to control all alien taxa, decision-makers increasingly rely on risk analyses to formalise the best available evidence of the threats posed and whether and how they can be managed. There are a variety of schemes available that consider the risks of alien taxa, but we argue a new framework is needed: 1) given major recent developments in international frameworks dealing with biological invasions (including the scoring of impacts); 2) so that decisions can be made consistently across taxa, regions and realms; 3) to explicitly set out uncertainties; and 4) to provide decision-makers with information both on the risks posed and on what can be done to mitigate or prevent impacts. Any such scheme must also be flexible enough to deal with constraints in capacity and information. Here we present a framework to address these points – the Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT). It outlines a series of questions related to an alien taxon’s likelihood of invasion, realised and potential impacts, and options for management. The framework provides a structure for collating relevant data from the published literature to support a robust, transparent process to list alien taxa under legislative and regulatory requirements, with the aim that it can be completed by a trained science graduate within a few days. The framework also provides a defensible process for developing recommendations for the management of assessed taxa. We trialled the framework in South Africa and outline the process followed and some of the taxa assessed to date.
Collapse
|
18
|
Brundu G, Pauchard A, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Bindewald AM, Brunori A, Canavan S, Campagnaro T, Celesti-Grapow L, Dechoum MDS, Dufour-Dror JM, Essl F, Flory SL, Genovesi P, Guarino F, Guangzhe L, Hulme PE, Jäger H, Kettle CJ, Krumm F, Langdon B, Lapin K, Lozano V, Le Roux JJ, Novoa A, Nuñez MA, Porté AJ, Silva JS, Schaffner U, Sitzia T, Tanner R, Tshidada N, Vítková M, Westergren M, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM. Global guidelines for the sustainable use of non-native trees to prevent tree invasions and mitigate their negative impacts. NEOBIOTA 2020. [DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.61.58380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Sustainably managed non-native trees deliver economic and societal benefits with limited risk of spread to adjoining areas. However, some plantations have launched invasions that cause substantial damage to biodiversity and ecosystem services, while others pose substantial threats of causing such impacts. The challenge is to maximise the benefits of non-native trees, while minimising negative impacts and preserving future benefits and options.
A workshop was held in 2019 to develop global guidelines for the sustainable use of non-native trees, using the Council of Europe – Bern Convention Code of Conduct on Invasive Alien Trees as a starting point.
The global guidelines consist of eight recommendations: 1) Use native trees, or non-invasive non-native trees, in preference to invasive non-native trees; 2) Be aware of and comply with international, national, and regional regulations concerning non-native trees; 3) Be aware of the risk of invasion and consider global change trends; 4) Design and adopt tailored practices for plantation site selection and silvicultural management; 5) Promote and implement early detection and rapid response programmes; 6) Design and adopt tailored practices for invasive non-native tree control, habitat restoration, and for dealing with highly modified ecosystems; 7) Engage with stakeholders on the risks posed by invasive non-native trees, the impacts caused, and the options for management; and 8) Develop and support global networks, collaborative research, and information sharing on native and non-native trees.
The global guidelines are a first step towards building global consensus on the precautions that should be taken when introducing and planting non-native trees. They are voluntary and are intended to complement statutory requirements under international and national legislation. The application of the global guidelines and the achievement of their goals will help to conserve forest biodiversity, ensure sustainable forestry, and contribute to the achievement of several Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations linked with forest biodiversity.
Collapse
|
19
|
Moghaddas SD, Abdoli A, Kiabi BH, Rahmani H. Identification of Establishment Risk and Potential Invasiveness of Non-Native Fish Species in Anzali Wetland, Iran, Using the Freshwater Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) and Climate Matching Model (CLIMATCH). RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS 2020. [DOI: 10.1134/s2075111720040086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
20
|
Pozebon H, Marques RP, Padilha G, O Neal M, Valmorbida I, Bevilaqua JG, Tay WT, Arnemann JA. Arthropod Invasions Versus Soybean Production in Brazil: A Review. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2020; 113:1591-1608. [PMID: 32515787 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toaa108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Soybean production in Brazil has been markedly affected by invasions of non-native arthropod species that feed on the crop, severely impacting biodiversity, food security, health, and economic development. Data on soybean production losses and increase in insecticide usage over the last two decades have not been explored in association with past invasion events, and the dynamics underlying the recent blitz of invasive species into Brazil remain largely unclear. We provide a review of arthropod invasions in the Brazilian soybean agroecosystem since 1990, indicating that the introductions of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) MEAM1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acari: Tetranychidae), and Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) are likely correlated with periods of increase in insecticide usage for soybean production. Using these three cases as examples, we review factors that could lead to increased likelihood of future invasions by particular pests, outlining four possible criteria to evaluate potential invasiveness of non-native arthropods: likelihood of entry, likelihood of establishment, biological features of the species, and availability of control measures. Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Aphis glycines (Matsumura) (Hemiptera: Sternorrhynca) are examples of highly damaging soybean pests, related to one or more of these factors, that could be introduced into Brazil over the next years and which could lead to problematic scenarios. Melanagromyza sojae (Zehnter) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) also meets these criteria and has successfully invaded and colonized Brazilian soybean fields in recent years. Our review identifies current issues within soybean pest management in Brazil and highlights the need to adopt management measures to offset future costs and minimize lost revenue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrique Pozebon
- Crop Protection Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, 1000 Roraima Avenue, Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
| | - Rafael P Marques
- Crop Protection Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, 1000 Roraima Avenue, Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
| | - Guilherme Padilha
- Crop Protection Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, 1000 Roraima Avenue, Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
| | | | | | - Julia G Bevilaqua
- Crop Protection Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, 1000 Roraima Avenue, Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
| | - Wee Tek Tay
- Entomology Department, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Jonas André Arnemann
- Crop Protection Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, 1000 Roraima Avenue, Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Weeds can impact many ecosystems, including natural, urban and agricultural environments. This paper discusses core weed biosecurity program concepts and considerations for urban and peri-urban areas from a remote sensing perspective and reviews the contribution of remote sensing to weed detection and management in these environments. Urban and peri-urban landscapes are typically heterogenous ecosystems with a variety of vectors for invasive weed species introduction and dispersal. This diversity requires agile systems to support landscape-scale detection and monitoring, while accommodating more site-specific management and eradication goals. The integration of remote sensing technologies within biosecurity programs presents an opportunity to improve weed detection rates, the timeliness of surveillance, distribution and monitoring data availability, and the cost-effectiveness of surveillance and eradication efforts. A framework (the Weed Aerial Surveillance Program) is presented to support a structured approach to integrating multiple remote sensing technologies into urban and peri-urban weed biosecurity and invasive species management efforts. It is designed to support the translation of remote sensing science into operational management outcomes and promote more effective use of remote sensing technologies within biosecurity programs.
Collapse
|
22
|
South J, Madzivanzira TC, Tshali N, Measey J, Weyl OLF. In a Pinch: Mechanisms Behind Potential Biotic Resistance Toward Two Invasive Crayfish by Native African Freshwater Crabs. Front Ecol Evol 2020. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
23
|
Gallien L, Thornhill AH, Zurell D, Miller JT, Richardson DM. Global predictors of alien plant establishment success: combining niche and trait proxies. Proc Biol Sci 2020; 286:20182477. [PMID: 30963833 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Biological invasions are on the rise globally. To reduce future invasions, it is imperative to determine the naturalization potential of species. Until now, screening approaches have relied largely on species-specific functional feature data. Such information is, however, time-consuming and expensive to collect, thwarting the screening of large numbers of potential invaders. We propose to resolve such data limitations by developing indicators of establishment success of alien species that can be readily derived from open-access databases. These indicators describe key features of successfully established aliens, including estimates of potential range size, niche overlap with human-disturbed environments, and proxies of species traits related to their palaeoinvasions and local dominance capacities. We demonstrate the utility of this new approach by applying it to two large and highly invasive plant groups: Australian acacias and eucalypts. Our results show that these indicators robustly predict establishment successes and failures in each clade independently, and that they can cross-predict establishment in these two clades. Interestingly, the indicator identified as most important was species potential range size on Earth, a variable too rarely considered as a predictor. By successfully identifying key features that predispose Australian plants to naturalize, we provide an objective and cost-effective protocol for flagging high-risk introductions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Gallien
- 1 Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University , Matieland 7602 , South Africa.,2 Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA (Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine) , 38000 Grenoble , France
| | - Andrew H Thornhill
- 3 Australian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University , Cairns, Queensland 4870 , Australia.,4 Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, National Research Collections , Black Mountain, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory , Australia
| | - Damaris Zurell
- 5 Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin , Berlin 10099 , Germany
| | - Joseph T Miller
- 4 Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, National Research Collections , Black Mountain, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory , Australia.,6 Office of International Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation , Alexandria, VA 22314 , USA
| | - David M Richardson
- 1 Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University , Matieland 7602 , South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Global Actions for Managing Cactus Invasions. PLANTS 2019; 8:plants8100421. [PMID: 31623290 PMCID: PMC6843271 DOI: 10.3390/plants8100421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The family Cactaceae Juss. contains some of the most widespread and damaging invasive alien plant species in the world, with Australia (39 species), South Africa (35) and Spain (24) being the main hotspots of invasion. The Global Cactus Working Group (IOBC GCWG) was launched in 2015 to improve international collaboration and identify key actions that can be taken to limit the impacts caused by cactus invasions worldwide. Based on the results of an on-line survey, information collated from a review of the scientific and grey literature, expertise of the authors, and because invasiveness appears to vary predictably across the family, we (the IOBC GCWG): (1) recommend that invasive and potentially invasive cacti are regulated, and to assist with this, propose five risk categories; (2) recommend that cactus invasions are treated physically or chemically before they become widespread; (3) advocate the use of biological control to manage widespread invasive species; and (4) encourage the development of public awareness and engagement initiatives to integrate all available knowledge and perspectives in the development and implementation of management actions, and address conflicts of interest, especially with the agricultural and ornamental sectors. Implementing these recommendations will require global co-operation. The IOBC GCWG aims to assist with this process through the dissemination of information and experience.
Collapse
|
25
|
Potential Invasion Risk of Pet Traded Lizards, Snakes, Crocodiles, and Tuatara in the EU on the Basis of a Risk Assessment Model (RAM) and Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK). DIVERSITY 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/d11090164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Because biological invasions can cause many negative impacts, accurate predictions are necessary for implementing effective restrictions aimed at specific high-risk taxa. The pet trade in recent years became the most important pathway for the introduction of non-indigenous species of reptiles worldwide. Therefore, we decided to determine the most common species of lizards, snakes, and crocodiles traded as pets on the basis of market surveys in the Czech Republic, which is an export hub for ornamental animals in the European Union (EU). Subsequently, the establishment and invasion potential for the entire EU was determined for 308 species using proven risk assessment models (RAM, AS-ISK). Species with high establishment potential (determined by RAM) and at the same time with high potential to significantly harm native ecosystems (determined by AS-ISK) included the snakes Thamnophis sirtalis (Colubridae), Morelia spilota (Pythonidae) and also the lizards Tiliqua scincoides (Scincidae) and Intellagama lesueurii (Agamidae).
Collapse
|
26
|
Li H, Heckel G, Huang Y, Fan W, Ślipiński A, Pang H. Genomic changes in the biological control agent Cryptolaemus montrouzieri associated with introduction. Evol Appl 2019; 12:989-1000. [PMID: 31080510 PMCID: PMC6503826 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Biological control is the main purpose of intentionally introducing non-native invertebrate species. The evolutionary changes that occur in the populations of the introduced biological control agents may determine the agent's efficiency and the environmental safety. Here, to explore the pattern and extent of potential genomic changes in the worldwide introduced predatory ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, we used a reduced-representation sequencing method to analyze the genome-wide differentiation of the samples from two native and five introduced locations. Our analyses based on a total of 53,032 single nucleotide polymorphism loci showed that beetles from the introduced locations in Asia and Europe exhibited significant reductions in genetic diversity and high differentiation compared with the samples from the native Australian range. Each introduced population belonged to a unique genetic cluster, while the beetles from two native locations were much more similar. These genomic patterns were also detected when the dataset was pruned for genomic outlier loci (52,318 SNPs remaining), suggesting that random genetic drift was the main force shaping the genetic diversity and population structure of this biological control agent. Our results provide a genome-wide characterization of polymorphisms in a biological control agent and reveal genomic differences that were influenced by the introduction history. These differences might complicate assessments of the efficiency of biological control and the invasion potential of this species but also indicate the feasibility of selective breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao‐Sen Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Ecology and Evolution, School of Life SciencesSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Gerald Heckel
- Institute of Ecology and EvolutionUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Yu‐Hao Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Ecology and Evolution, School of Life SciencesSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Wei‐Jian Fan
- College of Life SciencesTianjin Normal UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Adam Ślipiński
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Ecology and Evolution, School of Life SciencesSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
- Australian National Insect Collection, National Research CollectionsCSIROCanberraAustralian Capital TerritoryAustralia
| | - Hong Pang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Ecology and Evolution, School of Life SciencesSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
García-Díaz P, Prowse TAA, Anderson DP, Lurgi M, Binny RN, Cassey P. A concise guide to developing and using quantitative models in conservation management. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2019; 1:e11. [PMID: 31915752 PMCID: PMC6949132 DOI: 10.1002/csp2.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantitative models are powerful tools for informing conservation
management and decision-making. As applied modeling is increasingly used to
address conservation problems, guidelines are required to clarify the scope of
modeling applications and to facilitate the impact and acceptance of models by
practitioners. We identify three key roles for quantitative models in
conservation management: (a) to assess the extent of a conservation problem; (b)
to provide insights into the dynamics of complex social and ecological systems;
and, (c) to evaluate the efficacy of proposed conservation interventions. We
describe 10 recommendations to facilitate the acceptance of quantitative models
in conservation management, providing a basis for good practice to guide their
development and evaluation in conservation applications. We structure these
recommendations within four established phases of model construction, enabling
their integration within existing workflows: (a) design (two recommendations);
(b) specification (two); (c) evaluation (one); and (d) inference (five).
Quantitative modeling can support effective conservation management provided
that both managers and modelers understand and agree on the place for models in
conservation. Our concise review and recommendations will assist conservation
managers and modelers to collaborate in the development of quantitative models
that are fit-for-purpose, and to trust and use these models appropriately while
understanding key drivers of uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas A A Prowse
- School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Miguel Lurgi
- Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS-Paul Sabatier University, Moulis, France
| | - Rachelle N Binny
- Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.,Te Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence for Complex Systems and Networks, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Phillip Cassey
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
García‐Díaz P, Prowse TA, Anderson DP, Lurgi M, Binny RN, Cassey P. A concise guide to developing and using quantitative models in conservation management. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas A.A. Prowse
- School of Mathematical SciencesThe University of Adelaide North Terrace South Australia Australia
| | | | - Miguel Lurgi
- Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Theoretical and Experimental Ecology StationCNRS‐Paul Sabatier University Moulis France
| | - Rachelle N. Binny
- Manaaki Whenua ‐ Landcare Research Lincoln New Zealand
- Te Pūnaha MatatiniCentre of Research Excellence for Complex Systems and Networks Auckland New Zealand
| | - Phillip Cassey
- School of Biological SciencesThe University of Adelaide North Terrace South Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bartz R, Kowarik I. Assessing the environmental impacts of invasive alien plants: a review of assessment approaches. NEOBIOTA 2019. [DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.43.30122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Assessing the impacts of alien plant species is a major task in invasion science and vitally important for supporting invasion-related policies. Since 1993, a range of assessment approaches have been developed to support decisions on the introduction or management of alien species. Here we review the extent to which assessments (27 approaches) appraised the following: (i) different types of environmental impacts, (ii) context dependence of environmental impacts, (iii) prospects for successful management, and (iv) transparency of assessment methods and criteria, underlying values and terminology. While nearly all approaches covered environmental effects, changes in genetic diversity and the incorporation of relevant impact parameters were less likely to be included. Many approaches considered context dependence by incorporating information about the actual or potential range of alien species. However, only a few went further and identified which resources of conservation concern might be affected by specific alien plant species. Only some approaches acknowledged underlying values by distinguishing negative from positive impacts or by considering the conservation value of affected resources. Several approaches directly addressed the feasibility of management, whereas relevant factors such as availability of suitable management methods were rarely considered. Finally, underlying values were rarely disclosed, and definitions of value-laden or controversial terms were often lacking. We conclude that despite important progress in assessing the manifold facets of invasion impacts, opportunities remain for further developing impact assessment approaches. These changes can improve assessment results and their acceptance in invasion-related environmental policies.
Collapse
|
30
|
Goldsmit J, McKindsey C, Archambault P, Howland KL. Ecological risk assessment of predicted marine invasions in the Canadian Arctic. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0211815. [PMID: 30730941 PMCID: PMC6366784 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Climate change is impacting environmental conditions, especially with respect to temperature and ice cover in high latitude regions. Predictive models and risk assessment are key tools for understanding potential changes associated with such impacts on coastal regions. In this study relative ecological risk assessment was done for future potential introductions of three species in the Canadian Arctic: periwinkle Littorina littorea, soft shell clam Mya arenaria and red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus. These species occur in locations connected to Canadian Arctic ports through shipping and have the potential to be introduced via ballast water discharge. The methodology proposed in this study is unique in the sense that it considers not only ballast water origin, but also the distribution of the species being assessed and the sensitivity of the receiving habitat. It combines detailed information (ballast water source of each tank, transit time, time of the year when the water is released, environmental suitability of receiving habitat, impact, and habitat sensitivity) in order to assess ecological risk. Through the use of this approach it is highlighted that domestic discharge events pose a higher relative overall risk on a vessel-specific and cumulative annual bases than international discharges. The main ports of Deception Bay and Churchill were classified as being at moderate to high relative risk for L. littorea and M. arenaria, especially from domestic vessels, while relative overall risk for P. camtschaticus was low for international vessels and null for domestic vessels due to few ships transiting from its range of distribution to Canadian Arctic ports. This work can serve as an approach to help build a list of potential high risk species–a “grey” watch list–for the Canadian Arctic, and provides useful information for consideration in future decision making actions such as the identification of high risk pathways, species and ports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesica Goldsmit
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Mont-Joli, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Biology, Science and Engineering Faculty, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- * E-mail: ,
| | - Christopher McKindsey
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Mont-Joli, Quebec, Canada
| | - Philippe Archambault
- Department of Biology, Science and Engineering Faculty, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kimberly L. Howland
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Arctic Research Division, Freshwater Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Di Febbraro M, Menchetti M, Russo D, Ancillotto L, Aloise G, Roscioni F, Preatoni DG, Loy A, Martinoli A, Bertolino S, Mori E. Integrating climate and land‐use change scenarios in modelling the future spread of invasive squirrels in Italy. DIVERS DISTRIB 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko Di Febbraro
- Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio Università del Molise Pesche (Isernia) Italy
| | - Mattia Menchetti
- Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC‐UPF) Barcelona Spain
- Dipartimento di Biologia Università degli Studi di Firenze Sesto Fiorentino (Florence) Italy
| | - Danilo Russo
- Wildlife Research Unit, Dipartimento di Agraria Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Portici, Napoli Italy
| | - Leonardo Ancillotto
- Wildlife Research Unit, Dipartimento di Agraria Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Portici, Napoli Italy
| | - Gaetano Aloise
- Museo di Storia Naturale della Calabria e Orto Botanico Università della Calabria Rende (Cosenza) Italy
| | - Federica Roscioni
- Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio Università del Molise Pesche (Isernia) Italy
| | - Damiano G. Preatoni
- Environmental Analysis and Management Unit, Guido Tosi Research Group, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences Università degli Studi dell’Insubria Varese Italy
| | - Anna Loy
- Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio Università del Molise Pesche (Isernia) Italy
| | - Adriano Martinoli
- Environmental Analysis and Management Unit, Guido Tosi Research Group, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences Università degli Studi dell’Insubria Varese Italy
| | - Sandro Bertolino
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biologia dei Sistemi Università di Torino Torino Italy
| | - Emiliano Mori
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita Università di Siena Siena Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nkuna KV, Visser V, Wilson JR, Kumschick S. Global environmental and socio-economic impacts of selected alien grasses as a basis for ranking threats to South Africa. NEOBIOTA 2018. [DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.41.26599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Decisions to allocate management resources should be underpinned by estimates of the impacts of biological invasions that are comparable across species and locations. For the same reason, it is important to assess what type of impacts are likely to occur where, and if such patterns can be generalised. In this paper, we aim to understand factors shaping patterns in the type and magnitude of impacts of a subset of alien grasses. We used the Generic Impact Scoring System (GISS) to review and quantify published impact records of 58 grass species that are alien to South Africa and to at least one other biogeographical realm. Based on the GISS scores, we investigated how impact magnitudes varied across habitats, regions and impact mechanisms using multiple regression. We found impact records for 48 species. Cortaderiaselloana had the highest overall impact score, although in contrast to five other species (Glyceriamaxima, Nassellatrichotoma, Phalarisaquatica, Polypogonmonspeliensis, and Sorghumhalepense) it did not score the highest possible impact score for any specific impact mechanism. Consistent with other studies, we found that the most frequent environmental impact was through competition with native plant species (with 75% of cases). Socio-economic impacts were recorded more often and tended to be greater in magnitude than environmental impacts, with impacts recorded particularly often on agricultural and animal production (57% and 51% of cases respectively). There was variation across different regions and habitats in impact magnitude, but the differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, alien grasses present in South Africa have caused a wide range of negative impacts across most habitats and regions of the world. Reviewing impacts from around the world has provided important information for the management of alien grasses in South Africa, and, we believe, is an important component of management prioritisation processes in general.
Collapse
|
33
|
van Wilgen NJ, Gillespie MS, Richardson DM, Measey J. A taxonomically and geographically constrained information base limits non-native reptile and amphibian risk assessment: a systematic review. PeerJ 2018; 6:e5850. [PMID: 30425887 PMCID: PMC6230440 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
For many taxa, new records of non-native introductions globally occur at a near exponential rate. We undertook a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications on non-native herpetofauna, to assess the information base available for assessing risks of future invasions, resulting in 836 relevant papers. The taxonomic and geographic scope of the literature was also compared to a published database of all known invasions globally. We found 1,116 species of herpetofauna, 95% of which were present in fewer than 12 studies. Nearly all literature on the invasion ecology of herpetofauna has appeared since 2000, with a strong focus on frogs (58%), particularly cane toads (Rhinella marina) and their impacts in Australia. While fewer papers have been published on turtles and snakes, proportionately more species from both these groups have been studied than for frogs. Within each herpetofaunal group, there are a handful of well-studied species: R. marina, Lithobates catesbeianus, Xenopus laevis, Trachemys scripta, Boiga irregularis and Anolis sagrei. Most research (416 papers; 50%) has addressed impacts, with far fewer studies on aspects like trade (2%). Besides Australia (213 studies), most countries have little location-specific peer-reviewed literature on non-native herpetofauna (on average 1.1 papers per established species). Other exceptions were Guam, the UK, China, California and France, but even their publication coverage across established species was not even. New methods for assessing and prioritizing invasive species such as the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa provide useful frameworks for risk assessment, but require robust species-level studies. Global initiatives, similar to the Global Amphibian Assessment, using the species and taxonomic groups identified here, are needed to derive the level of information across broad geographic ranges required to apply these frameworks. Expansive studies on model species can be used to indicate productive research foci for understudied taxa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J van Wilgen
- Cape Research Centre, South African National Parks, Steenberg, Western Cape, South Africa.,Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
| | - Micaela S Gillespie
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
| | - David M Richardson
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
| | - John Measey
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Therriault TW, Nelson JC, Carlton JT, Liggan L, Otani M, Kawai H, Scriven D, Ruiz GM, Clarke Murray C. The invasion risk of species associated with Japanese Tsunami Marine Debris in Pacific North America and Hawaii. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2018; 132:82-89. [PMID: 29395102 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Revised: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/28/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Marine debris from the Great Tsunami of 2011 represents a unique transport vector for Japanese species to reach Pacific North America and Hawaii. Here we characterize the invasion risk of invertebrate species associated with tsunami debris using a screening-level risk assessment tool - the Canadian Marine Invasive Screening Tool (CMIST). Higher-risk invertebrate invaders were identified for each of five different ecoregions. Some of these are well-known global invaders, such as the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis and the ascidian Didemnum vexillum which already have invasion histories in some of the assessed ecoregions, while others like the sea star Asterias amurensis and the shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus have yet to invade large portions of the assessed ecoregions but also are recognized global invaders. In general, the probability of invasion was lower for the Gulf of Alaska and Hawaii, in part due to lower climate matches and the availability of other invasion vectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas W Therriault
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.
| | - Jocelyn C Nelson
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, BC, Canada; North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES), Sidney, BC, Canada
| | | | - Lauran Liggan
- North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES), Sidney, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Danielle Scriven
- North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES), Sidney, BC, Canada
| | - Gregory M Ruiz
- Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA
| | - Cathryn Clarke Murray
- North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES), Sidney, BC, Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bellard C, Jeschke JM, Leroy B, Mace GM. Insights from modeling studies on how climate change affects invasive alien species geography. Ecol Evol 2018; 8:5688-5700. [PMID: 29938085 PMCID: PMC6010883 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Climate change and biological invasions are threatening biodiversity and ecosystem services worldwide. It has now been widely acknowledged that climate change will affect biological invasions. A large number of studies have investigated predicted shifts and other changes in the geographic ranges of invasive alien species related to climate change using modeling approaches. Yet these studies have provided contradictory evidence, and no consensus has been reached. We conducted a systematic review of 423 modeling case studies included in 71 publications that have examined the predicted effects of climate change on those species. We differentiate the approaches used in these studies and synthesize their main results. Our results reaffirm the major role of climate change as a driver of invasive alien species distribution in the future. We found biases in the literature both regarding the taxa, toward plants and invertebrates, and the areas of the planet investigated. Despite these biases, we found for the plants and vertebrates studied that climate change will more frequently contribute to a decrease in species range size than an increase in the overall area occupied. This is largely due to oceans preventing terrestrial invaders from spreading poleward. In contrast, we found that the ranges of invertebrates and pathogens studied are more likely to increase following climate change. An important caveat to these findings is that researchers have rarely considered the effects of climate change on transport, introduction success, or the resulting impacts. We recommend closing these research gaps, and propose additional avenues for future investigations, as well as opportunities and challenges for managing invasions under climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine Bellard
- Department of Genetics, Evolution and EnvironmentCentre for Biodiversity and Environment ResearchLondonUK
- Unité Biologie des organismes et écosystèmes aquatiques (BOREA UMR 7208)Muséum national d'Histoire naturelleCNRS, IRDSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université de Caen Normandie, Université des AntillesParisFrance
| | - Jonathan M. Jeschke
- Leibniz‐Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB)BerlinGermany
- Department of Biology, Chemistry, PharmacyInstitute of BiologyFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
- Berlin‐Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB)BerlinGermany
| | - Boris Leroy
- Unité Biologie des organismes et écosystèmes aquatiques (BOREA UMR 7208)Muséum national d'Histoire naturelleCNRS, IRDSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université de Caen Normandie, Université des AntillesParisFrance
| | - Georgina M. Mace
- Department of Genetics, Evolution and EnvironmentCentre for Biodiversity and Environment ResearchLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cassey P, Delean S, Lockwood JL, Sadowski JS, Blackburn TM. Dissecting the null model for biological invasions: A meta-analysis of the propagule pressure effect. PLoS Biol 2018; 16:e2005987. [PMID: 29684017 PMCID: PMC5933808 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
A consistent determinant of the establishment success of alien species appears to be the number of individuals that are introduced to found a population (propagule pressure), yet variation in the form of this relationship has been largely unexplored. Here, we present the first quantitative systematic review of this form, using Bayesian meta-analytical methods. The relationship between propagule pressure and establishment success has been evaluated for a broad range of taxa and life histories, including invertebrates, herbaceous plants and long-lived trees, and terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates. We found a positive mean effect of propagule pressure on establishment success to be a feature of every hypothesis we tested. However, establishment success most critically depended on propagule pressures in the range of 10–100 individuals. Heterogeneity in effect size was associated primarily with different analytical approaches, with some evidence of larger effect sizes in animal rather than plant introductions. Conversely, no variation was accounted for in any analysis by the scale of study (field to global) or methodology (observational, experimental, or proxy) used. Our analyses reveal remarkable consistency in the form of the relationship between propagule pressure and alien population establishment success. Alien species are a major contributor to human-induced global environmental change. The probability of whether or not an alien species will successfully establish in a novel environment is often related to the number of times a species is introduced and the number of individuals that are introduced each time, collectively termed ‘propagule pressure’. Despite this evidence, we don’t yet know whether this is a universal characteristic of species invasions, and the role of propagule pressure continues to be questioned. Here, we present a quantitative meta-analysis of the relationship between propagule pressure and establishment success across a broad range of species and geographies. We found that propagule pressure was consistently and positively associated with the establishment success of alien species. We conclude that propagule pressure is indeed the most consistent and strongest determinant of alien species establishment. No other factors suggested to explain establishment success can claim such universal support. Our results underpin a clear policy and management target for slowing invasion rates by reducing propagule pressure—ideally to single figures or zero—regardless of any other feature of the invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip Cassey
- School of Biological Sciences and the Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Steven Delean
- School of Biological Sciences and the Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Julie L. Lockwood
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Jason S. Sadowski
- Bodega Marine Lab, University of California at Davis, Bodega Bay, California, United States of America
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
| | - Tim M. Blackburn
- School of Biological Sciences and the Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, Centre for Biodiversity & Environment Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kühn I, Pyšek P, Kowarik I. Seven years of NeoBiota – the times, were they a changin’? NEOBIOTA 2017. [DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.36.21926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
38
|
|
39
|
Novoa A, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Wilson JRU. Level of environmental threat posed by horticultural trade in Cactaceae. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2017; 31:1066-1075. [PMID: 28074500 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Revised: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Ornamental horticulture has been identified as an important threat to plant biodiversity and is a major pathway for plant invasions worldwide. In this context, the family Cactaceae is particularly challenging because it is considered the fifth most threatened large taxonomic group in the world; several species are among the most widespread and damaging invasive species; and Cactaceae is one of the most popular horticultural plant groups. Based on the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna and the 11 largest online auction sites selling cacti, we documented the international cactus trade. To provide an in-depth look at the dynamics of the industry, we surveyed the businesses involved in the cactus trade in South Africa (a hotspot of cactus trade and invasions). We purchased seeds of every available species and used DNA barcoding to identify species to the genus level. Although <20% of this trade involved threatened species and <3% involved known invasive species, many species were identified by a common name. However, only 0.02% of the globally traded cacti were collected from wild populations. Despite a large commercial network, all South African imports (of which 15% and 1.5% were of species listed as threatened and invasive, respectively) came from the same source. With DNA barcoding, we identified 24% of the species to genus level. Based on our results, we believe that if trade restrictions are placed on the small proportion of cacti that are invasive and there is no major increase in harvesting of native populations, then the commercial trade in cactus poses a negligible environmental threat. However, there are currently no effective methods for easily identifying which cacti are traded, and both the illicit harvesting of cacti from the wild and the informal trade in invasive taxa pose on-going conservation challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Novoa
- Department of Botany and Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
- Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Claremont, South Africa
| | - Johannes J Le Roux
- Department of Botany and Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
| | - David M Richardson
- Department of Botany and Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
| | - John R U Wilson
- Department of Botany and Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
- Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Claremont, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rödder D, Ihlow F, Courant J, Secondi J, Herrel A, Rebelo R, Measey GJ, Lillo F, De Villiers FA, De Busschere C, Backeljau T. Global realized niche divergence in the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis. Ecol Evol 2017; 7:4044-4058. [PMID: 28616199 PMCID: PMC5468131 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Although of crucial importance for invasion biology and impact assessments of climate change, it remains widely unknown how species cope with and adapt to environmental conditions beyond their currently realized climatic niches (i.e., those climatic conditions existing populations are exposed to). The African clawed frog Xenopus laevis, native to southern Africa, has established numerous invasive populations on multiple continents making it a pertinent model organism to study environmental niche dynamics. In this study, we assess whether the realized niches of the invasive populations in Europe, South, and North America represent subsets of the species’ realized niche in its native distributional range or if niche shifts are traceable. If shifts are traceable, we ask whether the realized niches of invasive populations still contain signatures of the niche of source populations what could indicate local adaptations. Univariate comparisons among bioclimatic conditions at native and invaded ranges revealed the invasive populations to be nested within the variable range of the native population. However, at the same time, invasive populations are well differentiated in multidimensional niche space as quantified via n‐dimensional hypervolumes. The most deviant invasive population are those from Europe. Our results suggest varying degrees of realized niche shifts, which are mainly driven by temperature related variables. The crosswise projection of the hypervolumes that were trained in invaded ranges revealed the south‐western Cape region as likely area of origin for all invasive populations, which is largely congruent with DNA sequence data and suggests a gradual exploration of novel climate space in invasive populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Rödder
- Herpetology Section Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK) Bonn Germany
| | - Flora Ihlow
- Herpetology Section Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK) Bonn Germany
| | | | - Jean Secondi
- UMR 5023 Ecologie des Hydrosystèmes Naturels et Anthropisés ENTPE CNRS Université de Lyon Université Lyon 1 Villeurbanne France.,UMR CNRS 6554 LETG-LEESA University of Angers Angers France
| | | | - Rui Rebelo
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa Portugal
| | - G J Measey
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa
| | | | - F A De Villiers
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa
| | | | - Thierry Backeljau
- Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.,Evolutionary Ecology Group University of Antwerp Antwerp Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vanderhoeven S, Branquart E, Casaer J, D’hondt B, Hulme PE, Shwartz A, Strubbe D, Turbé A, Verreycken H, Adriaens T. Beyond protocols: improving the reliability of expert-based risk analysis underpinning invasive species policies. Biol Invasions 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-017-1434-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
42
|
Visser V, Wilson JR, Canavan K, Canavan S, Fish L, Le Maitre D, Nänni I, Mashau C, O’Connor T, Ivey P, Kumschick S, Richardson DM. Grasses as invasive plants in South Africa revisited: Patterns, pathways and management. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.4102/abc.v47i2.2169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Background: In many countries around the world, the most damaging invasive plant species are grasses. However, the status of grass invasions in South Africa has not been documented recently. Objectives: To update Sue Milton’s 2004 review of grasses as invasive alien plants in South Africa, provide the first detailed species level inventory of alien grasses in South Africa and assess the invasion dynamics and management of the group. Method: We compiled the most comprehensive inventory of alien grasses in South Africa to date using recorded occurrences of alien grasses in the country from various literature and database sources. Using historical literature, we reviewed past efforts to introduce alien grasses into South Africa. We sourced information on the origins, uses, distributions and minimum residence times to investigate pathways and patterns of spatial extent. We identified alien grasses in South Africa that are having environmental and economic impacts and determined whether management options have been identified, and legislation created, for these species. Results: There are at least 256 alien grass species in the country, 37 of which have become invasive. Alien grass species richness increased most dramatically from the late 1800s to about 1940. Alien grass species that are not naturalised or invasive have much shorter residence times than those that have naturalised or become invasive. Most grasses were probably introduced for forage purposes, and a large number of alien grass species were trialled at pasture research stations. A large number of alien grass species in South Africa are of Eurasian origin, although more recent introductions include species from elsewhere in Africa and from Australasia. Alien grasses are most prevalent in the south-west of the country, and the Fynbos Biome has the most alien grasses and the most widespread species. We identified 11 species that have recorded environmental and economic impacts in the country. Few alien grasses have prescribed or researched management techniques. Moreover, current legislation neither adequately covers invasive species nor reflects the impacts and geographical extent of these species. Conclusion: South Africa has few invasive grass species, but there is much uncertainty regarding the identity, numbers of species, distributions, abundances and impacts of alien grasses. Although introductions of alien grasses have declined in recent decades, South Africa has a potentially large invasion debt. This highlights the need for continued monitoring and much greater investment in alien grass management, research and legislation.
Collapse
|
43
|
Keller RP, Kumschick S. Promise and challenges of risk assessment as an approach for preventing the arrival of harmful alien species. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.4102/abc.v47i2.2136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Background: Harmful alien species impose a growing environmental, economic and human well-being burden around the globe. A promising way to reduce the arrival of new species that may become harmful is to utilise pre-border risk assessment (RA) tools that relate the traits of introduced species to whether those species have become established and harmful. These tools can be applied to species proposed for intentional introduction so that informed decisions can be made about whether each species poses an acceptable risk and should be allowed for import. Objectives: A range of approaches to RA tool development have emerged, each relying on different assumptions about the relationships between traits and species impacts, and each requiring different levels and types of data. We set out to compare the qualities of each approach and make recommendations for their application in South Africa, a high biodiversity developing country that already has many invasive species. Method: We reviewed five approaches to pre-border RA and assessed the benefits and drawbacks of each. We focused on how pre-border RA could be applied in South Africa. Results: Recent legislation presents a framework for RA to evaluate species introductions to South Africa, but we find that this framework assumes an approach to RA that is relatively slow and costly and that does not leverage recent advances in RA tool development. Conclusion: There is potential for proven RA approaches to be applied in South Africa that would be less costly and that could more rapidly assess the suite of species currently being introduced.
Collapse
|
44
|
Kumschick S, Measey GJ, Vimercati G, de Villiers FA, Mokhatla MM, Davies SJ, Thorp CJ, Rebelo AD, Blackburn TM, Kraus F. How repeatable is the Environmental Impact Classification of Alien Taxa (EICAT)? Comparing independent global impact assessments of amphibians. Ecol Evol 2017; 7:2661-2670. [PMID: 28428857 PMCID: PMC5395449 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Revised: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The magnitude of impacts some alien species cause to native environments makes them targets for regulation and management. However, which species to target is not always clear, and comparisons of a wide variety of impacts are necessary. Impact scoring systems can aid management prioritization of alien species. For such tools to be objective, they need to be robust to assessor bias. Here, we assess the newly proposed Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) used for amphibians and test how outcomes differ between assessors. Two independent assessments were made by Kraus (Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 46, 2015, 75‐97) and Kumschick et al. (Neobiota, 33, 2017, 53‐66), including independent literature searches for impact records. Most of the differences between these two classifications can be attributed to different literature search strategies used with only one‐third of the combined number of references shared between both studies. For the commonly assessed species, the classification of maximum impacts for most species is similar between assessors, but there are differences in the more detailed assessments. We clarify one specific issue resulting from different interpretations of EICAT, namely the practical interpretation and assigning of disease impacts in the absence of direct evidence of transmission from alien to native species. The differences between assessments outlined here cannot be attributed to features of the scheme. Reporting bias should be avoided by assessing all alien species rather than only the seemingly high‐impacting ones, which also improves the utility of the data for management and prioritization for future research. Furthermore, assessments of the same taxon by various assessors and a structured review process for assessments, as proposed by Hawkins et al. (Diversity and Distributions, 21, 2015, 1360), can ensure that biases can be avoided and all important literature is included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Kumschick
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa.,Invasive Species Programme South African National Biodiversity Institute Kirstenbosch National Botanical Gardens Claremont South Africa
| | - G John Measey
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| | - Giovanni Vimercati
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| | - F Andre de Villiers
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| | - Mohlamatsane M Mokhatla
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| | - Sarah J Davies
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| | - Corey J Thorp
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| | - Alexander D Rebelo
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| | - Tim M Blackburn
- Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa.,Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment Centre for Biodiversity & Environment Research University College London London UK.,Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY UK
| | - Fred Kraus
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kumschick S, Vimercati G, de Villiers FA, Mokhatla MM, Davies SJ, Thorp CJ, Rebelo AD, Measey GJ. Impact assessment with different scoring tools: How well do alien amphibian assessments match? NEOBIOTA 2017. [DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.33.10376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
46
|
A Framework for Evaluating Heterogeneity and Landscape-Level Impacts of Non-native Aquatic Species. Ecosystems 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s10021-016-0102-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
47
|
Branquart E, Brundu G, Buholzer S, Chapman D, Ehret P, Fried G, Starfinger U, van Valkenburg J, Tanner R. A prioritization process for invasive alien plant species incorporating the requirements of EU Regulation no. 1143/2014. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/epp.12336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E. Branquart
- Invasive Species Unit; Service Public de Wallonie; Gembloux Belgium
| | - G. Brundu
- University of Sassari; Sassari Italy
| | - S. Buholzer
- Agroscope Institute for Sustainability Sciences; Zurich Switzerland
| | - D. Chapman
- NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Edinburgh UK
| | - P. Ehret
- Ministry of Agriculture; National Plant Protection Organization; Montpellier Cedex 2 France
| | - G. Fried
- Anses, Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux; Unité Entomologie et Plantes Invasives; Montferrier-sur-Lez Cedex France
| | - U. Starfinger
- Julius Kühn Institut (JKI); Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants; Institute for National and International Plant Health; Braunschweig Germany
| | | | - R. Tanner
- European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization; Paris France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Koch C, Jeschke JM, Overbeck GE, Kollmann J. Setting Priorities for Monitoring and Managing Non-native Plants: Toward a Practical Approach. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2016; 58:465-475. [PMID: 27272017 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0718-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Land managers face the challenge to set priorities in monitoring and managing non-native plant species, as resources are limited and not all non-natives become invasive. Existing frameworks that have been proposed to rank non-native species require extensive information on their distribution, abundance, and impact. This information is difficult to obtain and often not available for many species and regions. National watch or priority lists are helpful, but it is questionable whether they provide sufficient information for environmental management on a regional scale. We therefore propose a decision tree that ranks species based on more simple albeit robust information, but still provides reliable management recommendations. To test the decision tree, we collected and evaluated distribution data from non-native plants in highland grasslands of Southern Brazil. We compared the results with a national list from the Brazilian Invasive Species Database for the state to discuss advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches on a regional scale. Out of 38 non-native species found, only four were also present on the national list. If management would solely rely on this list, many species that were identified as spreading based on the decision tree would go unnoticed. With the suggested scheme, it is possible to assign species to active management, to monitoring, or further evaluation. While national lists are certainly important, management on a regional scale should employ additional tools that adequately consider the actual risk of non-natives to become invasive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Koch
- Restoration Ecology, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Straße 6, 85354, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
- Department of Botany, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
| | - Jonathan M Jeschke
- Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 1-3, 14195, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Altensteinstraße 34, 14195, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gerhard E Overbeck
- Department of Botany, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Johannes Kollmann
- Restoration Ecology, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Straße 6, 85354, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rumlerová Z, Vilà M, Pergl J, Nentwig W, Pyšek P. Scoring environmental and socioeconomic impacts of alien plants invasive in Europe. Biol Invasions 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-016-1259-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
50
|
Brundu G, Richardson DM. Planted forests and invasive alien trees in Europe: A Code for managing existing and future plantings to mitigate the risk of negative impacts from invasions. NEOBIOTA 2016. [DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.30.7015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|