1
|
Lozano V, Di Febbraro M, Brundu G, Carranza ML, Alessandrini A, Ardenghi NMG, Barni E, Bedini G, Celesti-Grapow L, Cianfaglione K, Cogoni A, Domina G, Fascetti S, Ferretti G, Foggi B, Iberite M, Lastrucci L, Lazzaro L, Mainetti A, Marinangeli F, Montagnani C, Musarella CM, Orsenigo S, Peccenini S, Peruzzi L, Poggio L, Proietti C, Prosser F, Ranfa A, Rosati L, Santangelo A, Selvaggi A, Spampinato G, Stinca A, Vacca G, Villani M, Siniscalco C. Plant invasion risk inside and outside protected areas: Propagule pressure, abiotic and biotic factors definitively matter. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 877:162993. [PMID: 36948323 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Invasive alien species are among the main global drivers of biodiversity loss posing major challenges to nature conservation and to managers of protected areas. The present study applied a methodological framework that combined invasive Species Distribution Models, based on propagule pressure, abiotic and biotic factors for 14 invasive alien plants of Union concern in Italy, with the local interpretable model-agnostic explanation analysis aiming to map, evaluate and analyse the risk of plant invasions across the country, inside and outside the network of protected areas. Using a hierarchical invasive Species Distribution Model, we explored the combined effect of propagule pressure, abiotic and biotic factors on shaping invasive alien plant occurrence across three biogeographic regions (Alpine, Continental, and Mediterranean) and realms (terrestrial and aquatic) in Italy. We disentangled the role of propagule pressure, abiotic and biotic factors on invasive alien plant distribution and projected invasion risk maps. We compared the risk posed by invasive alien plants inside and outside protected areas. Invasive alien plant distribution varied across biogeographic regions and realms and unevenly threatens protected areas. As an alien's occurrence and risk on a national scale are linked with abiotic factors followed by propagule pressure, their local distribution in protected areas is shaped by propagule pressure and biotic filters. The proposed modelling framework for the assessment of the risk posed by invasive alien plants across spatial scales and under different protection regimes represents an attempt to fill the gap between theory and practice in conservation planning helping to identify scale, site, and species-specific priorities of management, monitoring and control actions. Based on solid theory and on free geographic information, it has great potential for application to wider networks of protected areas in the world and to any invasive alien plant, aiding improved management strategies claimed by the environmental legislation and national and global strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Lozano
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39/A, 07100 Sassari, Italy; National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo 90133, Italy.
| | - Mirko Di Febbraro
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo 90133, Italy; EnviX-Lab, Dipartimento Di Bioscienze e Territorio, Università Degli Studi Del Molise, C. DaFonte Lappone, 86090 Pesche, IS, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Brundu
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39/A, 07100 Sassari, Italy; National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo 90133, Italy.
| | - Maria Laura Carranza
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo 90133, Italy; EnviX-Lab, Dipartimento Di Bioscienze e Territorio, Università Degli Studi Del Molise, C. DaFonte Lappone, 86090 Pesche, IS, Italy.
| | | | | | - Elena Barni
- Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Gianni Bedini
- PLANTSEED Lab, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Italy.
| | | | | | - Annalena Cogoni
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Botany section, University of Cagliari, Viale S.Ignazio 13, 09123 Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Gianniantonio Domina
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Simonetta Fascetti
- School of Agriculture, Forestry, Food and Environment, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
| | - Giulio Ferretti
- Museum of Natural History, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Bruno Foggi
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Mauro Iberite
- Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Lorenzo Lazzaro
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Andrea Mainetti
- Biodiversity service and scientific research, Gran Paradiso National Park, fraz. Valnontey 44, 11012, Cogne, Aosta, Italy.
| | - Francesca Marinangeli
- Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Chiara Montagnani
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.
| | | | - Simone Orsenigo
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | | | - Lorenzo Peruzzi
- PLANTSEED Lab, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Laura Poggio
- Biodiversity service and scientific research, Gran Paradiso National Park, fraz. Valnontey 44, 11012, Cogne, Aosta, Italy.
| | - Chiara Proietti
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, Italy.
| | - Filippo Prosser
- Fondazione Museo Civico di Rovereto, I-38068 Rovereto, Italy.
| | - Aldo Ranfa
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, Italy.
| | - Leonardo Rosati
- School of Agriculture, Forestry, Food and Environment, University of Basilicata, Via Ateneo Lucano 10, Potenza I-85100, Italy.
| | - Annalisa Santangelo
- Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, via Foria 223, 80139 Napoli, Italy.
| | | | - Giovanni Spampinato
- Department of Agriculture, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
| | - Adriano Stinca
- Department of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy.
| | - Gabriella Vacca
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39/A, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
| | | | - Consolata Siniscalco
- Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schüttler E, Jiménez JE. Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs? Animals (Basel) 2022; 12:ani12243564. [PMID: 36552483 PMCID: PMC9774271 DOI: 10.3390/ani12243564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Dogs are the most abundant carnivores on earth and, as such, negatively impact wildlife. Free-ranging dogs roam in many protected areas, which in turn are often tourist destinations. Whether tourists influence their roaming is largely unexplored but highly relevant to wildlife conservation. To address this question, we obtained (i) 81 completed questionnaires from tourists on their experience with free-ranging dogs in the remote Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile, and (ii) photographs of three camera-traps placed next to trekking trails (n = 87 trap days). A third of the participants were followed by dogs for up to four days, and 39% saw free-ranging dogs on their hikes, but neither feeding dogs nor fear of them had any influence on whether tourists were followed by dogs. Camera-traps yielded 53 independent dog sequences, recorded 32 individuals plus 14 unidentified dogs, of which only one was leashed, with a frequency of one dog every 28th person. In 17% of 53 sequences, dogs were photographed together with hikers carrying large backpacks for several-day trips. We conclude that tourists are facilitators for the movement of dogs and highlight the importance of the engagement of the tourism sector in wildlife conservation in and close to protected areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Schüttler
- Sub-Antarctic Biocultural Conservation Program, Universidad de Magallanes, Teniente Muñoz 166, Puerto Williams 6350000, Chile
- Cape Horn International Center (CHIC), O’Higgins 310, Puerto Williams 6350000, Chile
- Correspondence:
| | - Jaime E. Jiménez
- Department of Biological Sciences and Advanced Environmental Research Institute (AERI), University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305220, Denton, TX 76203, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Minervino AHH, Andersson E, Norlander E, Moreira TR, Gennari SM, Mercado Caruso N, Moraes Filho J, Marcili A, Martins TF, Labruna MB. Serosurvey of spotted fever group Rickettsia in equids from western Pará, Amazon, Brazil. EXPERIMENTAL & APPLIED ACAROLOGY 2022; 88:361-370. [PMID: 36331665 DOI: 10.1007/s10493-022-00753-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
From a previous large epidemiological survey, we randomly selected 474 serum samples (463 horses and 11 mules) distributed among four municipalities of Pará state, Amazon region, Brazil, and from three types: farm animal, urban carthorse, and sport horse. Samples were tested by indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT ≥ 64) for antibodies reactive to spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsiae using Rickettsia rickettsii as crude antigens. From the 474 equids tested, 149 (31.4%) had ticks attached during sampling, belonging mostly to the species Dermacentor nitens. The overall seroprevalence for SFG rickettsiae was 31.4% (95% confidence interval: 27.3-35.9%) with 149 seropositive animals out of 474 screened. Notably, 77 equids (16.2%) had high endpoint titers ranging from 512 to 16,384, indicating that they had been exposed to SFG rickettsiae not long before sampling. Animal type affected rickettsial seroprevalence, with significantly higher values among farm horses when compared with urban and sport animals. Presence of dogs and tick infestation were negatively associated with equid seropositivity to R. rickettsii. This is the first report of SFG rickettsiae-reactive antibodies in equids from Pará state, Brazilian Amazon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emelie Andersson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Emma Norlander
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Thiago Rocha Moreira
- Laboratory of Animal Health, LARSANA, Federal University of Western Pará, UFOPA, Santarém, Pará, Brazil
| | - Solange Maria Gennari
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, FMVZ, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Master's and Doctorate in One Health, Santo Amaro University, UNISA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Nohora Mercado Caruso
- Departamento Productividad e Innovación, Universidad de la Costa, CUC. Calle 58 n.55-66, Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia
| | - Jonas Moraes Filho
- Master's and Doctorate in One Health, Santo Amaro University, UNISA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Arlei Marcili
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, FMVZ, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Master's and Doctorate in One Health, Santo Amaro University, UNISA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Thiago Fernandes Martins
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, FMVZ, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo B Labruna
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, FMVZ, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ellwanger JH, Chies JAB. The triad "dogs, conservation and zoonotic diseases" - An old and still neglected problem in Brazil. Perspect Ecol Conserv 2019; 17:157-161. [PMID: 32572390 PMCID: PMC7148981 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of domestic/free-ranging dogs in Brazilian protected areas and native vegetation fragments is an important problem, mainly because these animals pose a threat to wild species that live in such areas. In addition, dogs constantly circulate between wildlife environments and urban regions, acting as "bridges" in spillover events. Dogs are traditionally recognized as vectors of zoonoses, which are correct, but their roles as facilitating agents for the "jump" of pathogens from wild animals to humans (and vice versa) are sparsely debated. In this context, this work briefly describes the different roles of dogs in the dynamics and ecology of infectious diseases, using the Brazilian scenario as a study model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Henrique Ellwanger
- Laboratory of Immunobiology and Immunogenetics, Department of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - José Artur Bogo Chies
- Laboratory of Immunobiology and Immunogenetics, Department of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|