1
|
Zhao L, Sun W, Lee K. Young children with higher verbal intelligence are less likely to cheat. J Exp Child Psychol 2024; 244:105933. [PMID: 38657522 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Cheating is a pervasive unethical behavior. Existing research involving young children has mainly focused on contextual factors affecting cheating behavior, whereas cognitive factors have been relatively understudied. This study investigated the unique role of verbal and performance intelligence on young children's cheating behavior (N = 50; mean age = 5.73 years; 25 boys). Bootstrapping hierarchical logistic regression showed that children's Verbal IQ scores were significantly and negatively correlated with their cheating behavior above and beyond the contributions of age, gender, and Performance IQ scores. Children with higher Verbal IQ scores were less inclined to cheat. However, neither children's Performance IQ nor their Total IQ scores had a significant and unique correlation with cheating. These findings suggest that intelligence plays a significant role in children's cheating but that this role is limited to verbal intelligence only. In addition, this study highlights the need for researchers to go beyond the contextual factors to study the early development of cheating behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhao
- Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory for Research in Early Development and Childcare, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, People's Republic of China; Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, People's Republic of China.
| | - Wenjin Sun
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, People's Republic of China; Dr. Erick Jackman Institute of Child Study, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2X2, Canada
| | - Kang Lee
- Dr. Erick Jackman Institute of Child Study, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2X2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng Y, Lee K, Zhao L. High consistency of cheating and honesty in early childhood. Dev Sci 2024:e13540. [PMID: 38898660 DOI: 10.1111/desc.13540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Three preregistered studies examined whether 5-year-old children cheat consistently or remain honest across multiple math tests. We observed high consistency in both honesty and cheating. All children who cheated on the first test continued cheating on subsequent tests, with shorter cheating latencies over time. In contrast, 77% of initially honest children maintained honesty despite repeated failure to complete the tests successfully. A brief integrity intervention helped initially honest children remain honest but failed to dissuade initially cheating children from cheating. These findings demonstrate that cheating emerges early and persists strongly in young children, underscoring the importance of early prevention efforts. They also suggest that bolstering honesty from the start may be more effective than attempting to remedy cheating after it has occurred. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Our research examines whether 5-year-old children, once they have started cheating, will continue to do so consistently. We also investigate whether 5-year-old children who are initially honest will continue to be honest subsequently. We discovered high consistency in both honesty and cheating among 5-year-old children. Almost all the children who initially cheated continued this behavior, while those who were honest stayed honest. A brief integrity-boosting intervention successfully helped 5-year-old children maintain their honesty. However, the same intervention failed to deter cheaters from cheating again. These findings underscore the importance of implementing integrity intervention as early as possible, potentially before children have had their first experience of cheating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zheng
- Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory for Research in Early Development and Childcare, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China
- Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China
| | - Kang Lee
- Dr. Erick Jackman Institute of Child Study, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Li Zhao
- Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory for Research in Early Development and Childcare, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yee S, Xu A, Batool K, Duan TY, Cameron CA, Lee K. Academic cheating in early childhood: Role of age, gender, personality, and self-efficacy. J Exp Child Psychol 2024; 242:105888. [PMID: 38430869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
The current study investigated the association of children's age, gender, ethnicity, Big Five personality traits, and self-efficacy with their academic cheating behaviors. Academic cheating is a rampant problem that has been documented in adolescents and adults for nearly a century, but our understanding of the early development and factors influencing academic cheating is still weak. Using Zoom, the current study recruited children aged 4 to 12 years (N = 388), measured their cheating behaviors through six tasks simulating academic testing scenarios, and assessed their Big Five personality traits and self-efficacy through a modified Berkeley Puppet Interview paradigm, as well as age and gender. We found that children cheated significantly less with increased age and that boys cheated significantly more than girls. However, neither Big Five personality traits nor self-efficacy were significantly correlated with children's cheating. These findings suggest that academic cheating is a developing issue from early to middle childhood and that factors such as gender socialization may play a role in such development. Personal characteristics such as personality traits and self-efficacy may undergo additional development before their associations with cheating become robust, as reported in the adult literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Yee
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Amy Xu
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Kanza Batool
- Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V6, Canada
| | - Tz-Yu Duan
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Catherine Ann Cameron
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| | - Kang Lee
- Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao L, Li Y, Ke S, Lee K. Self-efficacy and cheating among young children. J Exp Child Psychol 2024; 241:105843. [PMID: 38271850 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
This research, comprising three preregistered studies, investigated the link between self-efficacy and cheating on an academic test in 5- and 6-year-old children. Study 1 assessed children's general self-efficacy and found it to be unrelated to their cheating behavior. Study 2 assessed task-specific self-efficacy, which was not found to be associated with cheating. In Study 3, children were randomly assigned to either an experimental group, which received brief positive feedback on task-specific self-efficacy, or a control group, which received no feedback. The experimental group demonstrated significantly less cheating. These findings, for the first time, identify a specific connection between young children's self-efficacy and academic dishonesty and suggest that positive feedback on task-specific efficacy could be a simple effective strategy for fostering academic integrity early on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhao
- Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory for Research in Early Development and Childcare, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, People's Republic of China; Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yaxin Li
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiqi Ke
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, People's Republic of China
| | - Kang Lee
- Dr. Erick Jackman Institute of Child Study, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2X2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kanngiesser P, Sunderarajan J, Woike JK. Cheating and the effect of promises in Indian and German children. Child Dev 2024; 95:16-23. [PMID: 37307385 DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Cheating is harmful to others and society at large. Promises have been shown to increase honesty in children, but their effectiveness has not been compared between different cultural contexts. In a study (2019) with 7- to 12-year-olds (N = 406, 48% female, middle-class), voluntary promises reduced cheating in Indian, but not in German children. Children in both contexts cheated, but cheating rates were lower in Germany than in India. In both contexts, cheating decreased with age in the (no-promise) control condition and was unaffected by age in the promise condition. These findings suggest that there may exist a threshold beyond which cheating cannot be further reduced by promises. This opens new research avenues on how children navigate honesty and promise norms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Kanngiesser
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- Faculty of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jahnavi Sunderarajan
- Faculty of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Social Sciences, Flame University, Pune, India
| | - Jan K Woike
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zanette S, Hagi Hussein S, Malloy LC. Adult's veracity judgments of Black and White children's statements: the role of perceiver and target race and prejudice-related concerns. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1177253. [PMID: 37564322 PMCID: PMC10410272 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Seldom has work investigated systematic biases in adults' truth and lie judgments of children's reports. Research demonstrates that adults tend to exhibit a bias toward believing a child is telling the truth, but it is unknown whether this truth bias applies equally to all children. Given the pervasiveness of racial prejudice and anti-Black racism in the United States, the current study examined whether adults are more or less likely to believe a child is telling the truth based on the race of the child (Black or White), the race of the adult perceiver (Black or White), and the perceiver's concerns regarding appearing unprejudiced. Methods Using an online data-collection platform, 593 Black and White American adults reviewed fictitious vignettes in which a child denied committing a misbehavior at school (e.g., damaging a laptop). The race of the child in the vignette was manipulated using an AI-generated photo of either a Black child or a White child. After reading each story, participants provided a categorical veracity judgment by indicating whether they believed the child in the story was lying (and therefore committed the misdeed) or telling the truth (and was innocent), as well as rated how honest or deceptive the child was being on a continuous scale. Participants also completed questionnaires assessing their internal (personal) and external (normative) motivations to respond in non-prejudiced ways. Results and discussion Results indicated that systematic racial biases occur in adults' veracity judgments of children's statements. Both Black and White participants exhibited a truth bias in their veracity judgments of Black children, but not when evaluating the deceptiveness of White children. Consistent with the prejudice-related concerns hypothesis, the observed truth bias toward Black children was moderated by individual differences in participants' desire to respond without prejudice and whether those motivations stem from external or internal sources. The current findings present novel evidence regarding racial bias and prejudice-related concerns as potential barriers to making veracity judgments of children's statements and, ultimately, successful lie detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Zanette
- Department of Psychology, Luther College at the University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada
| | - Siham Hagi Hussein
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada
| | - Lindsay C. Malloy
- Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhao L, Li Y, Sun W, Zheng Y, Harris PL. Hearing about a story character's negative emotional reaction to having been dishonest causes young children to cheat less. Dev Sci 2023; 26:e13313. [PMID: 35962719 DOI: 10.1111/desc.13313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
There is extensive research on the development of cheating in early childhood but research on how to reduce it is rare. The present preregistered study examined whether telling young children about a story character's emotional reactions towards cheating could significantly reduce their tendency to cheat (N = 400; 199 boys; Age: 3-6 years). Results showed that telling older kindergarten children about the story character's negative emotional reaction towards rule violation significantly reduced cheating, but telling them about the positive emotional reaction towards rule adherence did not. These results show that children as young as age 5 are able to use information about another child's emotional reaction to guide their own moral behavior. In particular, highlighting another child's negative emotional reaction towards a moral transgression may be an effective way to reduce cheating in early childhood. This finding, along with earlier cheating reduction findings, suggests that although cheating is common in early childhood, simple methods can reduce its occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhao
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Yingying Li
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Wenjin Sun
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Yi Zheng
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Paul L Harris
- Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Default settings affect children's decisions about whether to be honest. Cognition 2023; 235:105390. [PMID: 36764049 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Behavioral economics research has revealed that our decision-making can be biased by default settings. That is, all other things being equal, adults tend to choose default options even when the effort involved in choosing other options is minimal. Extensive evidence shows that default settings can systematically influence adult decisions in a wide variety of domains (e.g., pension choices, organ donation), but little is known about their developmental origin. Of interest in the present research is whether default settings can influence young children's decisions about whether to be honest. We investigated this question in two studies of 5- and 6-year-old Chinese children (total N = 120; 60 girls; Mage = 5.81, SDage = 0.14). Each study used a specially designed device that allowed children to play a guessing game in either a Cheating Default condition in which they would cheat by doing nothing or in an Honesty Default condition in which they would be honest by doing nothing. In each condition, they had the option of taking a trivially easy action to override the default (pushing a button in Study 1 or moving a screen in Study 2). In both studies, children decided to cheat significantly more often in the Cheating Default condition than in the Honesty Default condition. Additionally, overall cheating rates were significantly higher in Study 2 than in Study 1 (55% vs. 25%), which suggests that even though the default setting effect generalized across different actions, the specific action in question can also affect the cheating rate. Taken together, these results indicate that default setting effects that have been observed in adults have origins in childhood, and they point toward new ways to use nudges to promote positive social development and moral decision-making.
Collapse
|
9
|
Prodan N, Moldovan M, Cacuci SA, Visu-Petra L. Interpretive Diversity Understanding, Parental Practices, and Contextual Factors Involved in Primary School-age Children's Cheating and Lying Behavior. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ 2022; 12:1621-1643. [PMID: 36421320 PMCID: PMC9689038 DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe12110114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Dishonesty is an interpersonal process that relies on sophisticated socio-cognitive mechanisms embedded in a complex network of individual and contextual factors. The present study examined parental rearing practices, bilingualism, socioeconomic status, and children's interpretive diversity understanding (i.e., the ability to understand the constructive nature of the human mind) in relation to their cheating and lie-telling behavior. 196 school-age children (9-11 years old) participated in a novel trivia game-like temptation resistance paradigm to elicit dishonesty and to verify their interpretive diversity understanding. Results revealed that children's decision to cheat and lie was positively associated with their understanding of the constructive nature of the human mind and with parental rejection. Children with rejective parents were more likely to lie compared to their counterparts. This may suggest that understanding social interactions and the relationship with caregivers can impact children's cheating behavior and the extent to which they are willing to deceive about it. Understanding the constructive nature of the mind was also a positive predictor of children's ability to maintain their lies. Finally, being bilingual and having a higher socioeconomic status positively predicted children's deception, these intriguing results warranting further research into the complex network of deception influences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Laura Visu-Petra
- Research in Individual Differences and Legal Psychology (RIDDLE) Lab, Department of Psychology, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The chronology of collective cheating: a qualitative study of collective dishonesty in academic contexts. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03885-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractCollective cheating can have serious consequences in professional and educational settings. Existing data show that collective cheating is common and that individuals cheat more when they are in groups, highlighting the existence of some collective organisation in the endeavour. However, little is known about the emergence of this behaviour and the group processing involved. Drawing on qualitative data from 20 semi-structured interviews and a thematic analysis, the present study explored collective cheating in academic contexts. Seven themes emerged that retrace the chronology of collective cheating from its beginning to its impact on the group: reasons, birth and organisation of collective cheating, risk management, concealment strategies, justifications and social impact. Participants emphasised the extrinsic benefits, the interdependence of members and the importance of existing social norms, as well as the positive valence of this kind of dishonesty. In participants' recalls, cheating together means cooperating, showing solidarity, helping and supporting each other.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhao L, Peng J, Dong LD, Li Y, Mao H, Compton BJ, Ye J, Li G, Heyman GD, Lee K. Effects of test difficulty messaging on academic cheating among middle school children. J Exp Child Psychol 2022; 220:105417. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
12
|
Zhao L, Zheng Y, Compton BJ, Qin W, Sun W, Fang F, Fu G, Heyman GD, Lee K. Subtle alterations of the physical environment can nudge young children to cheat less. Dev Sci 2021; 25:e13190. [PMID: 34750930 DOI: 10.1111/desc.13190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Cheating is a common human behavior but few studies have examined its emergence during early childhood. In three preregistered studies, a challenging math test was administered to 5- to 6-year-old children (total N = 500; 255 girls). An answer key was present as children completed the test, but they were instructed to not peek at it. In Study 1, many children cheated, but manipulations that reduced the answer key's accessibility in terms of proximity and visibility led to less cheating. Two follow-up studies showed that the answer key's visibility played a more significant role than its proximity. These findings suggest that subtle and seemingly insignificant alterations of the physical environment can effectively nudge young children away from acting dishonestly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhao
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Zheng
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Brian J Compton
- Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Wen Qin
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenjin Sun
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.,Dr Eric Jackman Institute of Child Study, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fang Fang
- School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.,IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Genyue Fu
- Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Gail D Heyman
- Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Kang Lee
- Dr Eric Jackman Institute of Child Study, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|