Distinctive properties of the interactions between Notch and Notch ligands

A feedback amplifier circuit with Notch and E2A orchestrates T-cell fate and suppresses the innate lymphoid cell lineages during thymic ontogeny

External signals from the thymic microenvironment and the activities of lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs) instruct T-cell versus innate lymphoid cell (ILC) fates. However, mechanistic insights into how factors such as Notch1-Delta-like-4 (Dll4) signaling and E-protein TFs collaborate to establish T-cell identity remain rudimentary. Using multiple in vivo approaches and single-cell multiome analysis, we identified a feedback amplifier circuit that specifies fetal and adult T-cell fates. In early T progenitors (ETPs) in the fetal thymus, Notch signaling minimally lowered E-protein antagonist Id2 levels, and high Id2 abundance favored the differentiation of ETPs into ILCs. Conversely, in the adult thymus, Notch signaling markedly decreased Id2 abundance in ETPs, substantially elevating E-protein DNA binding and in turn promoting the activation of a T-cell lineage-specific gene expression program linked with V(D)J gene recombination and T-cell receptor signaling. Our findings indicate that, in the fetal versus the adult thymus, a simple feedback amplifier circuit dictated by Notch-mediated signals and Id2 abundance enforces T-cell identity and suppresses ILC development.

Regulation of the microglial polarization for alleviating neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis and therapeutics of major depressive disorder

Major depressive disorder (MDD), as a multimodal neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative illness with high prevalence and disability rates, has become a burden to world health and the economy that affects millions of individuals worldwide. Neuroinflammation, an atypical immune response occurring in the brain, is currently gaining more attention due to its association with MDD. Microglia, as immune sentinels, have a vital function in regulating neuroinflammatory reactions in the immune system of the central nervous system. From the perspective of steady-state branching states, they can transition phenotypes between two extremes, namely, M1 and M2 phenotypes are pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory, respectively. It has an intermediate transition state characterized by different transcriptional features and the release of inflammatory mediators. The timing regulation of inflammatory cytokine release is crucial for damage control and guiding microglia back to a steady state. The dysregulation can lead to exorbitant tissue injury and neuronal mortality, and targeting the cellular signaling pathway that serves as the regulatory basis for microglia is considered an essential pathway for treating MDD. However, the specific intervention targets and mechanisms of microglial activation pathways in neuroinflammation are still unclear. Therefore, the present review summarized and discussed various signaling pathways and effective intervention targets that trigger the activation of microglia from its branching state and emphasizes the mechanism of microglia-mediated neuroinflammation associated with MDD.

Multi-modular structure of the gene regulatory network for specification and commitment of murine T cells

T cells develop from multipotent progenitors by a gradual process dependent on intrathymic Notch signaling and coupled with extensive proliferation. The stages leading them to T-cell lineage commitment are well characterized by single-cell and bulk RNA analyses of sorted populations and by direct measurements of precursor-product relationships. This process depends not only on Notch signaling but also on multiple transcription factors, some associated with stemness and multipotency, some with alternative lineages, and others associated with T-cell fate. These factors interact in opposing or semi-independent T cell gene regulatory network (GRN) subcircuits that are increasingly well defined. A newly comprehensive picture of this network has emerged. Importantly, because key factors in the GRN can bind to markedly different genomic sites at one stage than they do at other stages, the genes they significantly regulate are also stage-specific. Global transcriptome analyses of perturbations have revealed an underlying modular structure to the T-cell commitment GRN, separating decisions to lose "stem-ness" from decisions to block alternative fates. Finally, the updated network sheds light on the intimate relationship between the T-cell program, which depends on the thymus, and the innate lymphoid cell (ILC) program, which does not.

Transcription factor Zbtb1 interacts with bridging factor Lmo2 and maintains the T-lineage differentiation capacity of lymphoid progenitor cells

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells can differentiate into all types of blood cells. Regulatory mechanisms underlying pluripotency in progenitors, such as the ability of lymphoid progenitor cells to differentiate into T-lineage, remain unclear. We have previously reported that LIM domain only 2 (Lmo2), a bridging factor in large transcriptional complexes, is essential to retain the ability of lymphoid progenitors to differentiate into T-lineage. However, biochemical characterization of Lmo2 protein complexes in physiological hematopoietic progenitors remains obscure. Here, we identified approximately 600 Lmo2-interacting molecules in a lymphoid progenitor cell line by two-step affinity purification with LC-MS/MS analysis. Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 1 (Zbtb1) and CBFA2/RUNX1 partner transcriptional corepressor 3 (Cbfa2t3) were found to be the functionally important binding partners of Lmo2. We determined CRISPR/Cas9-mediated acute disruption of Zbtb1 or Cbfa2t3 in the lymphoid progenitor or bone marrow–derived primary hematopoietic progenitor cells causes significant defects in the initiation of T-cell development when Notch signaling is activated. Our transcriptome analysis of Zbtb1- or Cbfa2t3-deficient lymphoid progenitors revealed that Tcf7 was a common target for both factors. Additionally, ChIP-seq analysis showed that Lmo2, Zbtb1, and Cbfa2t3 cobind to the Tcf7 upstream enhancer region, which is occupied by the Notch intracellular domain/RBPJ transcriptional complex after Notch stimulation, in lymphoid progenitors. Moreover, transduction with Tcf7 restored the defect in the T-lineage potential of Zbtb1-deficient lymphoid progenitors. Thus, in lymphoid progenitors, the Lmo2/Zbtb1/Cbfa2t3 complex directly binds to the Tcf7 locus and maintains responsiveness to the Notch-mediated inductive signaling to facilitate T-lineage differentiation.

Dll1 Can Function as a Ligand of Notch1 and Notch2 in the Thymic Epithelium

T-cell development in the thymus is dependent on Notch signaling induced by the interaction of Notch1, present on immigrant cells, with a Notch ligand, delta-like (Dll) 4, on the thymic epithelial cells. Phylogenetic analysis characterizing the properties of the Dll4 molecule suggests that Dll4 emerged from the common ancestor of lobe- and ray-finned fishes and diverged into bony fishes and terrestrial organisms, including mammals. The thymus evolved in cartilaginous fishes before Dll4, suggesting that T-cell development in cartilaginous fishes is dependent on Dll1 instead of Dll4. In this study, we compared the function of both Dll molecules in the thymic epithelium using Foxn1-cre and Dll4-floxed mice with conditional transgenic alleles in which the Dll1 or Dll4 gene is transcribed after the cre-mediated excision of the stop codon. The expression of Dll1 in the thymic epithelium completely restored the defect in the Dll4-deficient condition, suggesting that Dll1 can trigger Notch signaling that is indispensable for T-cell development in the thymus. Moreover, using bone marrow chimeras with Notch1- or Notch2-deficient hematopoietic cells, we showed that Dll1 is able to activate Notch signaling, which is sufficient to induce T-cell development, with both the receptors, in contrast to Dll4, which works only with Notch1, in the thymic environment. These results strongly support the hypothesis that Dll1 regulates T-cell development via Notch1 and/or Notch2 in the thymus of cartilaginous fishes and that Dll4 has replaced Dll1 in inducing thymic Notch signaling via Notch1 during evolution.

Two distinct Notch signals, Delta-like 4/Notch1 and Jagged-1/Notch2, antagonistically regulate chemical hepatocarcinogenesis in mice

Notch signaling is one of the most common drivers of carcinogenesis in many types of cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, it occasionally suppresses tumor progression. Moreover, it is virtually unknown how different sets of Notch ligands and receptors regulate the HCC development. In this study, we demonstrate that the expression of the Notch ligands, Delta-like 4 (Dll4) and Jagged-1 (Jag1), is upregulated during diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Dll4 is detected in the preneoplastic hepatocytes and HCC cells, but not in the normal hepatocytes, while Jag1 is expressed in the desmin-positive mesenchymal cells. Hepatocyte-specific Dll4 knockout abolishes the Notch1 signaling and suppresses the tumor progression. In contrast, Jag1 deletion induces the ectopic expression of Dll4 in hepatocytes along with the loss of Notch2 signaling, leading to the tumor progression. These results indicate that the two distinct Notch signals, Dll4/Notch1 and Jag1/Notch2, are antagonistic to each other, exerting opposite effects on HCC progression.

Dll4/Notch1 signal promotes the progression of HCC, while Jag1/Notch2 signal antagonistically suppresses it in murine chemical hepatocarcinogenesis. Nakano et al. report that two distinct Notch signals regulate the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using tissue specific loss of function mouse mutants. They find Dll4/Notch1 signal promotes HCC progression, while the Jag1/Notch2 signal antagonistically suppresses it.

Notch signaling supports the appearance of follicular helper T cells in the Peyer's patches concomitantly with the reduction of regulatory T cells

The intracellular fragment of Notch1, a mediator of Notch signaling that is frequently detected in thymic immigrants, is critical for specifying T cell fate in the thymus, where Delta-like 4 (Dll4) functions as a Notch ligand on the epithelium. However, as such Notch signaling has not been detected in mature T cells, how Notch signaling contributes to their response in secondary lymphoid organs has not yet been fully defined. Here, we detected the marked expression of Dll4 on the stromal cells and the active fragment of Notch1 (Notch1 intracellular domain, N1ICD) in CD4 + T cells in the follicle of Peyer's patches (PPs). In addition, N1ICD-bearing T cells were also found in the T-cell zone of PP, especially in the transcription factor Foxp3 + regulatory T (Treg) cells, with slight expression of Dll4 on the stromal cells. These fragments disappeared in Dll4-deficient conditions. It was also found that Notch1- and Notch2-deficient T cells preferentially differentiated into Treg cells in PPs, but not CXCR5 +PD-1 + follicular helper T (Tfh) cells. Moreover, these phenotypes were also observed in chimeric mice reconstituted with the control and T cell-specific Notch1/2-deficient bone marrow or Treg cells. These results demonstrated that Dll4-mediated Notch signaling in PPs is required for the efficient appearance of Tfh cells in a Treg cell-prone environment, which is common among the gut-associated lymphoid tissues, and is critical for the generation of Tfh-mediated germinal center B cells.

Notch2 complements Notch1 to mediate inductive signaling that initiates early T cell development

Notch signaling is the dominant intercellular signaling input during the earliest stages of T cell development in the thymus. Although Notch1 is known to be indispensable, we show that it does not mediate all Notch signaling in precommitment stages: Notch2 initially works in parallel to promote early murine T cell development and antagonize other fates. Notch-regulated target genes before and after T lineage commitment change dynamically, and we show that this partially reflects shifts in genome-wide DNA binding by RBPJ, the transcription factor activated by complex formation with the Notch intracellular domain. Although Notch signaling and transcription factor PU.1 can activate some common targets in precommitment T progenitors, Notch signaling and PU.1 activity have functionally antagonistic effects on multiple targets, delineating separation of pro-T cells from alternative PU.1-dependent fates. These results define a distinct mechanism of Notch signal response that distinguishes the initial stages of murine T cell development.

Transcription factors regulate early T cell development via redeployment of other factors: Functional dynamics of constitutively required factors in cell fate decisions

Establishment of cell lineage identity from multipotent progenitors is controlled by cooperative actions of lineage-specific and stably expressed transcription factors, combined with input from environmental signals. Lineage-specific master transcription factors activate and repress gene expression by recruiting consistently expressed transcription factors and chromatin modifiers to their target loci. Recent technical advances in genome-wide and multi-omics analysis have shed light on unexpected mechanisms that underlie more complicated actions of transcription factors in cell fate decisions. In this review, we discuss functional dynamics of stably expressed and continuously required factors, Notch and Runx family members, throughout developmental stages of early T cell development in the thymus. Pre- and post-commitment stage-specific transcription factors induce dynamic redeployment of Notch and Runx binding genomic regions. Thus, together with stage-specific transcription factors, shared transcription factors across distinct developmental stages regulate acquisition of T lineage identity.

Current Views on the Roles of O-Glycosylation in Controlling Notch-Ligand Interactions

The 100th anniversary of Notch discovery in Drosophila has recently passed. The Notch is evolutionarily conserved from Drosophila to humans. The discovery of human-specific Notch genes has led to a better understanding of Notch signaling in development and diseases and will continue to stimulate further research in the future. Notch receptors are responsible for cell-to-cell signaling. They are activated by cell-surface ligands located on adjacent cells. Notch activation plays an important role in determining the fate of cells, and dysregulation of Notch signaling results in numerous human diseases. Notch receptors are primarily activated by ligand binding. Many studies in various fields including genetics, developmental biology, biochemistry, and structural biology conducted over the past two decades have revealed that the activation of the Notch receptor is regulated by unique glycan modifications. Such modifications include O-fucose, O-glucose, and O-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) on epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats located consecutively in the extracellular domain of Notch receptors. Being fine-tuned by glycans is an important property of Notch receptors. In this review article, we summarize the latest findings on the regulation of Notch activation by glycosylation and discuss future challenges.

An overview of signaling pathways regulating YAP/TAZ activity

YAP and TAZ are ubiquitously expressed homologous proteins originally identified as penultimate effectors of the Hippo signaling pathway, which plays a key role in maintaining mammalian tissue/organ size. Presently, it is known that YAP/TAZ also interact with various non-Hippo signaling pathways, and have diverse roles in multiple biological processes, including cell proliferation, tissue regeneration, cell lineage fate determination, tumorigenesis, and mechanosensing. In this review, we first examine the various microenvironmental cues and signaling pathways that regulate YAP/TAZ activation, through the Hippo and non-Hippo signaling pathways. This is followed by a brief summary of the interactions of YAP/TAZ with TEAD1-4 and a diverse array of other non-TEAD transcription factors. Finally, we offer a critical perspective on how increasing knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms of YAP/TAZ signaling might open the door to novel therapeutic applications in the interrelated fields of biomaterials, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine and synthetic biology.

Specific Targeting of Notch Ligand-Receptor Interactions to Modulate Immune Responses: A Review of Clinical and Preclinical Findings

Understanding and targeting Notch signaling effectively has long been valued in the field of cancer and other immune disorders. Here, we discuss key discoveries at the intersection of Notch signaling, cancer and immunology. While there is a plethora of Notch targeting agents tested in vitro, in vivo and in clinic, undesirable off-target effects and therapy-related toxicities have been significant obstacles. We make a case for the clinical application of ligand-derived and affinity modifying compounds as novel therapeutic agents and discuss major research findings with an emphasis on Notch ligand-specific modulation of immune responses.

NOTCH2 participates in Jagged1-induced osteogenic differentiation in human periodontal ligament cells

Jagged1 activates Notch signaling and subsequently promotes osteogenic differentiation in human periodontal ligament cells (hPDLs). The present study investigated the participation of the Notch receptor, NOTCH2, in the Jagged1-induced osteogenic differentiation in hPDLs. NOTCH2 and NOTCH4 mRNA expression levels increased during hPDL osteogenic differentiation. However, the endogenous NOTCH2 expression levels were markedly higher compared with NOTCH4. NOTCH2 expression knockdown using shRNA in hPDLs did not dramatically alter their proliferation or osteogenic differentiation compared with the shRNA control. After seeding on Jagged1-immobilized surfaces and maintaining the hPDLs in osteogenic medium, HES1 and HEY1 mRNA levels were markedly reduced in the shNOTCH2-transduced cells compared with the shControl group. Further, shNOTCH2-transduced cells exhibited less alkaline phosphatase enzymatic activity and in vitro mineralization than the shControl cells when exposed to Jagged1. MSX2 and COL1A1 mRNA expression after Jagged1 activation were reduced in shNOTCH2-transduced cells. Endogenous Notch signaling inhibition using a γ-secretase inhibitor (DAPT) attenuated mineralization in hPDLs. DAPT treatment significantly promoted TWIST1, but decreased ALP, mRNA expression, compared with the control. In conclusion, Notch signaling is involved in hPDL osteogenic differentiation. Moreover, NOTCH2 participates in the mechanism by which Jagged1 induced osteogenic differentiation in hPDLs.

Notch receptors and ligands in inflammatory arthritis - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Notch pathway is highly conserved across species and is involved in the regulation of cell differentiation and activity both in embryonic development and adult life. Notch signaling has an important role in the development of hematopoietic stem cells and their differentiation to committed lineages, as well as in the regulation of several non-hematopoietic cell lines.

OBJECTIVE

As Notch signaling has been implicated in various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, it is of interest to elucidate what role do Notch receptors and ligands have in inflammatory arthritides.

METHODS

We performed a search on the role of Notch receptors (1-4) and Notch ligands Delta-like (DLL) 1, 3, 4 and Jagged (Jag) 1 and 2 in animal models of inflammatory arthritis and most common types of human inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis). The initial search identified 135 unique articles, of which 24 were ultimately deemed relevant and included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

Overall, identified articles describe roles for Notch ligands and receptors in inflammatory arthritis, with Notch activation resulting in enhanced Th1/17 polarization, osteoclast differentiation, macrophage activation and fibroblast-like synoviocyte proliferation. However, the inhibitory role of Notch signaling, especially by Jag1 is also described.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence that Notch pathway activation affects multiple cell lineages present within the arthritic environment, therefore potentially acting as one of the drivers of disease pathogenesis. Since cell lineage-selective transgenic mouse models and specific Notch receptor inhibitors are becoming increasingly available, it can be expected that future research will evaluate whether Notch signaling components initiate crucial pathogenic impulses and, therefore, present viable therapeutic targets in inflammatory arthritis.