Reflections on the contribution of the Assisting Hand Assessment

Consensus-Based Evaluation of Outcome Measures in Pediatric Stroke Care: A Toolkit

Following a pediatric stroke, outcome measures selected for monitoring functional recovery and development vary widely. We sought to develop a toolkit of outcome measures that are currently available to clinicians, possess strong psychometric properties, and are feasible for use within clinical settings. A multidisciplinary group of clinicians and scientists from the International Pediatric Stroke Organization comprehensively reviewed the quality of measures in multiple domains described in pediatric stroke populations including global performance, motor and cognitive function, language, quality of life, and behavior and adaptive functioning. The quality of each measure was evaluated using guidelines focused on responsiveness and sensitivity, reliability, validity, feasibility, and predictive utility. A total of 48 outcome measures were included and were rated by experts based on the available evidence within the literature supporting the strengths of their psychometric properties and practical use. Only three measures were found to be validated for use in pediatric stroke: the Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure, the Pediatric Stroke Recurrence and Recovery Questionnaire, and the Pediatric Stroke Quality of Life Measure. However, multiple additional measures were deemed to have good psychometric properties and acceptable utility for assessing pediatric stroke outcomes. Strengths and weaknesses of commonly used measures including feasibility are highlighted to guide evidence-based and practicable outcome measure selection. Improving the coherence of outcome assessment will facilitate comparison of studies and enhance research and clinical care in children with stroke. Further work is urgently needed to close the gap and validate measures across all clinically significant domains in the pediatric stroke population.

Development of bimanual performance in young children with cerebral palsy

AIM

To describe the development of bimanual performance among young children with unilateral or bilateral cerebral palsy (CP).

METHOD

A population-based sample of 102 children (53 males, 49 females), median age 28.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 16mo) at first assessment and 47 months (IQR 18mo) at last assessment, was assessed half-yearly with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) or the Both Hands Assessment (BoHA) for a total of 329 assessments. Developmental limits and rates were estimated by nonlinear mixed-effects models. Developmental trajectories were compared between levels of manual ability (Mini-Manual Ability Classification System [Mini-MACS] and MACS) and AHA or BoHA performance at 18 months of age (AHA-18/BoHA-18) for both CP subgroups, and additionally between children with bilateral CP with symmetric or asymmetric hand use.

RESULTS

For both CP subgroups, children classified in Mini-MACS/MACS level I, and those with high AHA-18 or BoHA-18 reached the highest limits of performance. For children with bilateral CP the developmental change was small, and children with symmetric hand use reached the highest limits.

INTERPRETATION

Mini-MACS/MACS levels and AHA-18 or BoHA-18 distinguished between various developmental trajectories both for children with unilateral and bilateral CP. Children with bilateral CP changed their performance to a smaller extent than children with unilateral CP.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Manual Ability Classification System levels and Assisting Hand Assessment/Both Hands Assessment performance at 18 months are important predictors of hand use development in cerebral palsy (CP). Children with bilateral CP improved less than those with unilateral CP. Children with bilateral CP and symmetric hand use reached higher limits than those with asymmetry.

Development of the assisting hand assessment for adults following stroke: a Rasch-built bimanual performance measure

AIMS

To describe the development of a new test of bimanual performance for adults following Stroke, the Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke, and to report the evidence of internal and external validity.

METHODS

Scale development included: (i) establishing the test situation; (ii) constructing test items; (iii) evaluating internal construct validity by use of Rasch measurement analysis on 144 assessments of adults with hemiparesis, mean age 53 years (SD11.45); and (iv) investigating external validity by correlation to the Jebsen and Taylor Test of Hand Function and the ABILHAND Stroke.

RESULTS

The Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke scale, scored on 19 items using a four-point rating scale, provided a valid measure of bimanual performance. The rating scale structure, goodness of fit, and principal component analysis demonstrated evidence of a unidimensional construct. The strong reliability and high person separation ratio indicated high probability for the scale to be responsive to change. Correlation to outcomes of the Jebsen and Taylor Test of Hand Function and the ABILHAND Stroke indicated strong external validity.

CONCLUSION

Using two hands together is a critical aspect for performance of most daily life tasks. However, assessments of hand function commonly focus on measuring aspects of unimanual function. The Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke has the potential to contribute new and clinically important knowledge to stroke rehabilitation by providing an observation-based valid functional measure of bimanual performance. Implications for rehabilitation Hand function assessments commonly focus on unimanual aspects, although the use of two hands together is critical to perform most daily life tasks. The Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke measures how effectively a patient with a hemiparesis uses his/her affected hand together with the unaffected hand to perform bimanual tasks. The Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke contributes a new and clinically important aspect to stroke rehabilitation by providing a valid bimanual observation-based measure to guide intervention and measure change over time.

Outcome measures evaluating hand function in children with bilateral cerebral palsy: a systematic review

AIM

To review outcome measures used to evaluate hand function, with emphasis on manual capacity and performance, in children with bilateral cerebral palsy (CP), to describe the content and measurement properties of such measures, and to investigate the quality of the studies that have examined these properties.

METHOD

Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and CINAHL were searched. The COSMIN-criteria (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) were used to assess the quality of studies and the Terwee criteria were used to assess the result of the studies.

RESULTS

Five hand function measures were identified from 16 papers. The strongest level of evidence for aspects of validity and reliability was found for the Melbourne Assessment 2, assessing unimanual capacity, and for the questionnaire ABILHAND-Kids, assessing perceived manual ability in daily activities. However, evidence for the responsiveness of these measures is missing.

INTERPRETATION

Further high-quality studies providing evidence for responsiveness, as well as for additional aspects of validity and reliability of the Melbourne Assessment 2 and the ABILHAND-Kids, are needed. Furthermore, there is a need to develop appropriate outcome measures evaluating how children with bilateral CP use their hands when handling objects in bimanual tasks.