A genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): experiences of patients and family members

Course of pregnancy and 10-year observation of twins diagnosed with GCK-MODY in the neonatal period: a case report

Monogenic diabetes accounts for 5% of all incidence of hyperglycemia and Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) is the most common form. In GCK-MODY, one of the most common forms of MODY, hyperglycemia is caused by a mutation of a gene responsible for coding glucokinase. At the clinical level, this condition presents as persistent, moderate and asymptomatic elevated fasting glucose levels and has a relatively low incidence of micro and macro-vascular complications. In general, the treatment of choice is to follow and maintain a healthy lifestyle. The incidence of GCK-MODY during pregnancy is 2% on average (0-6%). In this report, we introduce a case of a woman diagnosed with GCK-MODY during the pregnancy with twins, a boy and a girl, diagnosed with GCK-MODY after birth. We discuss the course of pregnancy, the need for access to fast and uncomplicated genetic diagnostics in utero, and the impact of the MODY diagnosis on the life of the mother and that of her children. In our case, the diagnosis of GCK-MODY was associated with a feeling of relief, after years of uncertainty, and helped to introduce more appropriate eating behaviors and lifestyle changes for both the mother and her children.

Genetic counseling in diabetes mellitus: A practice resource of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

Diabetes mellitus is a group of diseases characterized by hyperglycemia and its consequences, affecting over 34 million individuals in the United States and 422 million worldwide. While most diabetes is polygenic and is classified as type 1 (T1D), type 2 (T2D), or gestational diabetes (GDM), at least 0.4% of all diabetes is monogenic in nature. Correct diagnosis of monogenic diabetes has important implications for glycemic management and genetic counseling. We provide this Practice Resource to familiarize the genetic counseling community with (1) the existence of monogenic diabetes, (2) how it differs from more common polygenic/complex diabetes types, (3) the advantage of a correct diagnosis, and (4) guidance for identifying, counseling, and testing patients and families with suspected monogenic diabetes. This document is intended for genetic counselors and other healthcare professionals providing clinical services in any setting, with the goal of maximizing the likelihood of a correct diagnosis of monogenic diabetes and access to related care.

Implementing genetic testing in diabetes: Knowledge, perceptions of healthcare professionals, and barriers in a developing country

INTRODUCTION

Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) is an unusual type of diabetes often missed in clinical practice, especially in Africa. Treatment decisions for MODY depend on a precise diagnosis, only made by genetic testing. We aimed to determine MODY knowledge among Nigerian healthcare professionals (HCPs), their perceptions, and barriers to the implementation of genetic testing in diabetes patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among doctors and nurses in three levels of public and private healthcare institutions in Ibadan, Nigeria, from December 2018 to June 2019. In all, 70% and 30% of a total 415 participants were recruited from public and private centers, respectively. HCPs were recruited in a 60:40% ratio, respectively. A 51-item instrument was used to assess MODY knowledge, perceptions of HCPs, and barriers to the implementation of genetic testing in diabetes patients.

RESULTS

In the survey, 43.4% self-rated their current MODY knowledge to be at least moderate. About 68%, 73% and 86%, respectively, correctly answered 3 of 5 questions on basic genetics' knowledge. However, only 1 of 7 MODY-specific questions was answered correctly by 72.7% of the respondents. The mean basic genetics and MODY-specific knowledge scores were 2.6/5 (SD=1.0) and 1.8/9 (SD=1.3), respectively. Multiple linear regression showed higher mean scores among those aged 30-49 years, those with degrees and fellowships (except PhD), and general practitioners; 360 (80.0%) perceived that genetic testing plays a central role in diabetes care. Barriers to genetic testing were lack of access to testing facilities, guidance on the use of and updates/educational materials on genetic testing (82.7%, 62.1% and 50.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The level of MODY awareness and knowledge among Nigerian HCPs is unacceptably low with a lack of access to genetic testing facilities. These can hinder the implementation of precision diabetes medicine. Increased awareness, provision of decision support aids, and genetic testing facilities are urgently needed.

The use of precision diagnostics for monogenic diabetes: a systematic review and expert opinion

BACKGROUND

Monogenic diabetes presents opportunities for precision medicine but is underdiagnosed. This review systematically assessed the evidence for (1) clinical criteria and (2) methods for genetic testing for monogenic diabetes, summarized resources for (3) considering a gene or (4) variant as causal for monogenic diabetes, provided expert recommendations for (5) reporting of results; and reviewed (6) next steps after monogenic diabetes diagnosis and (7) challenges in precision medicine field.

METHODS

Pubmed and Embase databases were searched (1990-2022) using inclusion/exclusion criteria for studies that sequenced one or more monogenic diabetes genes in at least 100 probands (Question 1), evaluated a non-obsolete genetic testing method to diagnose monogenic diabetes (Question 2). The risk of bias was assessed using the revised QUADAS-2 tool. Existing guidelines were summarized for questions 3-5, and review of studies for questions 6-7, supplemented by expert recommendations. Results were summarized in tables and informed recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

There are 100, 32, 36, and 14 studies included for questions 1, 2, 6, and 7 respectively. On this basis, four recommendations for who to test and five on how to test for monogenic diabetes are provided. Existing guidelines for variant curation and gene-disease validity curation are summarized. Reporting by gene names is recommended as an alternative to the term MODY. Key steps after making a genetic diagnosis and major gaps in our current knowledge are highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a synthesis of current evidence and expert opinion on how to use precision diagnostics to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes.

A Systematic Review of the use of Precision Diagnostics in Monogenic Diabetes

Monogenic forms of diabetes present opportunities for precision medicine as identification of the underlying genetic cause has implications for treatment and prognosis. However, genetic testing remains inconsistent across countries and health providers, often resulting in both missed diagnosis and misclassification of diabetes type. One of the barriers to deploying genetic testing is uncertainty over whom to test as the clinical features for monogenic diabetes overlap with those for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In this review, we perform a systematic evaluation of the evidence for the clinical and biochemical criteria used to guide selection of individuals with diabetes for genetic testing and review the evidence for the optimal methods for variant detection in genes involved in monogenic diabetes. In parallel we revisit the current clinical guidelines for genetic testing for monogenic diabetes and provide expert opinion on the interpretation and reporting of genetic tests. We provide a series of recommendations for the field informed by our systematic review, synthesizing evidence, and expert opinion. Finally, we identify major challenges for the field and highlight areas for future research and investment to support wider implementation of precision diagnostics for monogenic diabetes.

Variable phenotypes of individual and family monogenic cases with hyperinsulinism and diabetes: a systematic review

Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Youth (MODY) diabetes remains commonly misdiagnosed. A monogenic form should be suspected in individuals presenting hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (HH) associated with, either later development of MODY (hypoglycemia-remission-diabetes sequence), or with first/second-degree family history of diabetes. Herein, we aimed to describe this individual or family monogenic association between HH and diabetes, and identify potential genotype-phenotype correlations. We conducted a systematic review of 26 studies, including a total of 67 patients with this association resulting from variants in GCK (n = 5 cases), ABCC8 (n = 29), HNF1A (n = 5), or HNF4A (n = 28). A family history of hypoglycemia and/or diabetes was present in 91% of cases (61/67). Median age at first hypoglycemia was 24 h after birth. Diazoxide was initiated in 46 children (46/67-69%); responsiveness was found in 91% (42/46). Median HH duration was three years (1 day-25 years). Twenty-three patients (23/67-34%) later developed diabetes (median age: 13 years; range: 8-48); more frequently in those untreated with diazoxide. This association was most commonly inherited in an autosomal dominant manner (43/48-90%). Some genes were associated with less severe initial hypoglycemia (HNF1A), shorter duration of HH (HNF4A), and more maternal (ABCC8) or paternal (HNF4A) transmission. This study illustrates that the same genotype can give a biphasic phenotype in the same person or a reverse phenotype in the same family. Wider awareness of this association is necessary in pediatrics to establish annual monitoring of patients who have presented HH, and during maternity to screen diabetes and optimize genetic counseling and management of pregnancy, childbirth, and the newborn.PROSPERO registration: CRD42020178265.

Patient perspectives on the diagnostic journey to a monogenic diabetes diagnosis: Barriers and facilitators

Most monogenic diabetes is misdiagnosed as either type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1D/T2D). Few studies have examined the diagnostic challenges from the patients' perspective. This qualitative study aimed to investigate patients' journeys to obtaining a diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) by elucidating the range of factors that can act as barriers and facilitators throughout this process. We recruited participants from the Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program (PDMP) at University of Maryland and used respondent-driven sampling to recruit additional patients. We conducted qualitative phone interviews between October 2016 and June 2017 with nine patients with diagnoses of monogenic diabetes (one HNF4A-MODY, seven GCK-MODY, and one HNF1A-MODY) and one parent of a patient with INS-MODY. Interview data were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed both inductively and deductively using thematic content analysis. All patients were female, with a mean age of 35 (range: 7-67 years). The amount of time these patients were misdiagnosed ranged from a few months to 41 years. We identified barriers and facilitators in three broad themes: (a) patient-related (nature of MODY symptoms, perceived test utility, individual personality); (b) provider-related (provider awareness and knowledge, provider communication); and (c) healthcare system-related (cost of testing, access to knowledgeable providers, patient education, and support resources). The diverse range of barriers and facilitators reiterates the complexity of the MODY diagnostic process. Limited awareness and knowledge of MODY from healthcare professionals and patients themselves account for most diagnostic delays described in this study. Efforts to promote awareness of MODY and expand access to screening and testing may result in quicker diagnosis and ensure the downstream benefits of proper treatment.

Screening for monogenic diabetes in primary care

AIMS

Updates on the latest diagnostic methods and features of MODY (Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young) and promotion of education and awareness on the subject are discussed.

METHOD

Previous recommendations were identified using PubMed and using combinations of terms including "MODY" "monogenic diabetes" "mature onset diabetes" "MODY case review". The diabetesgenes.org website and the US Monogenic Diabetes Registry (University of Colorado) were directly referenced. The remaining referenced papers were taken from peer-reviewed journals. The initial literature search occurred in January 2017 and the final search occurred in September 2018.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of MODY has implications for treatment, quality of life, management in pregnancy and research. The threshold for referral and testing varies among different ethnic groups, and depends on body mass index, family history of diabetes and associated syndromes. Novel causative genetic variations are still being discovered however testing is currently limited by low referral rates. Educational material is currently being promoted in the UK in an effort to raise awareness.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits and implications of life altering treatment such as termination of insulin administration are significant but little can be done without appropriate identification and referral.

Monogenic diabetes: the impact of making the right diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Monogenic forms of diabetes have received increased attention and genetic testing is more widely available; however, many patients are still misdiagnosed as having type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes. This review will address updates to monogenic diabetes prevalence, identification, treatment, and genetic testing.

RECENT FINDINGS

The creation of a T1D genetic risk score and the use of noninvasive urinary C-peptide creatinine ratios have provided new tools to aid in the discrimination of possible monogenic diabetes from likely T1D. Early, high-dose sulfonylurea treatment in infants with a KCNJ11 or ABCC8 mutation continues to be well tolerated and effective. As the field moves towards more comprehensive genetic testing methods, there is an increased opportunity to identify novel genetic causes. Genetic testing results continue to allow for personalized treatment but should provide patient information at an appropriate health literacy level.

SUMMARY

Although there have been clinical and genetic advances in monogenic diabetes, patients are still misdiagnosed. Improved insurance coverage of genetic testing is needed. The majority of data on monogenic diabetes has been collected from Caucasian populations, therefore, research studies should endeavor to include broader ethnic and racial diversity to provide comprehensive information for all populations.

Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases

The use of whole exome sequencing (WES) for diagnostics of children with rare genetic diseases raises questions about best practices in genetic counselling. While a lot of attention is now given to pre-test counselling procedures for WES, little is known about how parents experience the (positive, negative, or inconclusive) WES results in daily life. To fill this knowledge gap, data were gathered through in-depth interviews with parents of 15 children who underwent WES analysis. WES test results, like results from other genetic tests, evoked relief as well as worries, irrespective of the type of result. Advantages of obtaining a conclusive diagnosis included becoming more accepting towards the situation, being enabled to attune care to the needs of the child, and better coping with feelings of guilt. Disadvantages experienced included a loss of hope for recovery, and a loss by parents of their social network of peers and the effort necessary to re-establish that social network. While parents with conclusive diagnoses were able to re-establish a peer community with the help of social media, parents receiving a possible diagnosis experienced hurdles in seeking peer support, as peers still needed to be identified. These types of psychosocial effects of WES test results for parents are important to take into account for the development of successful genetic counselling strategies.

Undiagnosed MODY: Time for Action

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a monogenic form of diabetes that accounts for at least 1 % of all cases of diabetes mellitus. MODY classically presents as non-insulin-requiring diabetes in lean individuals typically younger than 25 with evidence of autosomal dominant inheritance, but these criteria do not capture all cases and can also overlap with other diabetes types. Genetic diagnosis of MODY is important for selecting the right treatment, yet ~95 % of MODY cases in the USA are misdiagnosed. MODY prevalence and characteristics have been well-studied in some populations, such as the UK and Norway, while other ethnicities, like African and Latino, need much more study. Emerging next-generation sequencing methods are making more widespread study and clinical diagnosis increasingly feasible; at the same time, they are detecting other mutations in the same genes of unknown clinical significance. This review will cover the current epidemiological studies of MODY and barriers and opportunities for moving toward a goal of access to an appropriate diagnosis for all affected individuals.