No further improvement in pregnancy-related outcomes in the offspring of mothers with pre-gestational diabetes in Bavaria, Germany, between 2001 and 2016

Pre-existing Diabetes and Stillbirth or Perinatal Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Despite the well-recognized association between pre-existing diabetes mellitus and stillbirth or perinatal mortality, there remain knowledge gaps about the strength of association across different populations. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the association between pre-existing diabetes and stillbirth or perinatal mortality, and secondarily, to identify risk factors predictive of stillbirth or perinatal mortality among those with pre-existing diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2022.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials in English or French that examined the association between pre-existing diabetes and stillbirth or perinatal mortality (as defined by the original authors) or identified risk factors for stillbirth and perinatal mortality in individuals with pre-existing diabetes were included. Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate with the use of prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Assessment for heterogeneity and risk of bias was performed. Meta-analyses were completed with a random-effects model.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

From 7,777 citations, 91 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pre-existing diabetes was associated with higher odds of stillbirth (37 studies; pooled odds ratio [OR] 3.74, 95% CI, 3.17-4.41, I2=82.5%) and perinatal mortality (14 studies; pooled OR 3.22, 95% CI, 2.54-4.07, I2=82.7%). Individuals with type 1 diabetes had lower odds of stillbirth (pooled OR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.68-0.95, I2=0%) and perinatal mortality (pooled OR 0.73, 95% CI, 0.61-0.87, I2=0%) compared with those with type 2 diabetes. Prenatal care and prepregnancy diabetes care were significantly associated with lower odds of stillbirth (OR 0.26, 95% CI, 0.11-0.62, I2=87.0%) and perinatal mortality (OR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.29-0.59, I2=0%).

CONCLUSION

Pre-existing diabetes confers a more than threefold increased odds of both stillbirth and perinatal mortality. Maternal type 2 diabetes was associated with a higher risk of stillbirth and perinatal mortality compared with maternal type 1 diabetes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022303112.

Pregnancy complications in women with pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for complications of pregnancy. Based on information for all inpatient births in Germany, we assessed the risks for selected pregnancy complications in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (preDM) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

METHODS

The underlying data comprised all singleton births contained in the inpatient perinatal medicine quality assurance statistics for the years 2013-2019. The frequencies of premature birth, elevated birth weight (large for gestational age, LGA), cesarean section, transfer of the newborn to the perinatal unit, and stillbirth were stratified by maternal age and diabetes status (preDM, GDM, no DM). Poisson regression was used to calculate the relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the whole period and for each individual year in women with preDM or GDM relative to women without DM.

RESULTS

Among the 4 991 275 singleton births included, GDM was documented in 283 210 (5.7%) and preDM in 46 605 (0.93%) cases. GDM was associated with higher RR for premature birth (1.13 [1.12; 1.15]), LGA (1.57 [1.55; 1.58]), cesarean section (1.26 [1.25; 1.27]), and transfer of the newborn (1.54 [1.52; 1.55]). These associations were even stronger in women with preDM: premature birth (2.13 [2.08; 2.18]), LGA (2.72 [2.67; 2.77]), cesarean section (1.62 [1.60; 1.64]), transfer of the newborn (2.61 [2.56; 2.66]). PreDM increased the risk of stillbirth (RR: 2.34 [2.11; 2.59]); GDM was associated with a lower risk (RR: 0.67 [0.62; 0.72]). For women with preDM, the risk of pregnancy complications increased over the study period.

CONCLUSION

GDM and preDM are still associated with elevated risks of pregnancy complications. In the case of preDM, the risks may be attributable to the fact that the hyperglycemia is more severe and is already present before conception. Continuous monitoring should include risk factors in pregnant women and care-relevant aspects.

Smoking and diabetes interplay: A comprehensive review and joint statement

Evidence shows that smoking increases the risk of pre-diabetes and diabetes in the general population. Among persons with diabetes, smoking has been found to increase the risk of all-cause mortality and aggravate chronic diabetic complications and glycemic control. The current paper, which is a joint position statement by the French-Speaking Society on Tobacco (Société Francophone de Tabacologie) and the French-Speaking Society of Diabetes (Société Francophone du Diabète), summarizes the data available on the association between smoking and diabetes and on the impact of smoking and smoking cessation among individuals with type 1, type 2, and gestational diabetes mellitus. It also provides evidence-based information about the pharmacological and behavioral strategies for smoking cessation in these patients.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with type 2 diabetes in First Nation and other Manitoban people: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

First Nation people living in Canada experience a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. In this study, we aimed to describe maternal and neonatal outcomes in First Nation and all other females with type 2 diabetes living in Manitoba, Canada.

METHODS

This was a population-level retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data from Manitoba (2012-2017). We compared First Nation females with type 2 diabetes with all other Manitoban females with type 2 diabetes, using relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 2181 females with type 2 diabetes were included, and 1218 (55.8%) were First Nation. First Nation females with type 2 diabetes were significantly more likely to experience stillbirth (RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.11-4.13) and perinatal death (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.37-4.17) than all other Manitoban females with type 2 diabetes. Offspring of First Nation females with type 2 diabetes had a higher risk of most neonatal complications than offspring of all other Manitoban females with type 2 diabetes, including a higher risk of congenital malformations (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.30-2.99), but First Nation people did not have a higher risk of most maternal complications.

INTERPRETATION

First Nation pregnant individuals living with type 2 diabetes experienced a higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes than all other Manitoban females with type 2 diabetes. Additional studies are needed to identify both high-risk and protective factors for pregnancy complications in First Nation people living with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy.

Adherence to clinical evaluations in women with pre-existing diabetes during pregnancy: A call to action from an Italian real-life investigation

AIMS

Women with pre-existing diabetes should plan for optimal care of the disease before, during and after pregnancy. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of diabetes mellitus monitoring and care before, during and after pregnancy in a large cohort of women.

METHODS

1913 diabetic women resident in the Lombardy Region (Italy) who experienced at least a birth between 2011 and 2015 and exhibited signs of diabetes ≥2 years before delivery were identified using the healthcare utilization database. Antidiabetic care was defined via outpatient examinations (i.e., assessments of glycated haemoglobin, lipid profile, urine albumin excretion and serum creatinine, and dilated eye exams) and use of antidiabetic drugs. Differences in adherence to recommendations before, during and after pregnancy were assessed by the non-parametric McNemar's test among the whole cohort and among the subgroup with type 1 diabetes.

RESULTS

Adherence to recommendations was very poor before pregnancy, ranging from 13% to 42% for dilated eye and serum creatinine exam, respectively. During pregnancy, a significant portion of women increased adherence to all recommendations (e.g., glycated haemoglobin from 20% to 47%, p-value < 0.001), with the exception of lipid profile control. After pregnancy, adherence dropped to pre-pregnancy levels. A similar trend was observed in the use of antidiabetic drugs. Although women with type 1 diabetes showed better adherence across all periods, the same patterns emerged.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides an improvement in the indicators of clinical adherence during pregnancy, the management of diabetes among pregnant women remains sub-optimal both before and after the birth.