Efficacy and safety of 28-day treatment with oral insulin (ORMD-0801) in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Electromechanical convective drug delivery devices for overcoming diffusion barriers

Drug delivery systems which rely on diffusion for mass transport, such as hydrogels and nanoparticles, have enhanced drug targeting and extended delivery profiles to improve health outcomes for patients suffering from diseases including cancer and diabetes. However, diffusion-dependent systems often fail to provide >0.01-1% drug bioavailability when transporting macromolecules across poorly permeable physiological tissues such as the skin, solid tumors, the blood-brain barrier, and the gastrointestinal walls. Convection-enabling robotic ingestibles, wearables, and implantables physically interact with tissue walls to improve bioavailability in these settings by multiple orders of magnitude through convective mass transfer, the process of moving drug molecules via bulk fluid flow. In this Review, we compare diffusive and convective drug delivery systems, highlight engineering techniques that enhance the efficacy of convective devices, and provide examples of synergies between the two methods of drug transport.

[Evolution of insulin therapy: past, present, future]

2021 marks the 100th anniversary of the discovery of insulin, an event that forever changed the lives of people with diabetes mellitus. At present patients around the world experience the miracle of insulin therapy every day. A disease that used to kill children and teenagers in 2 years in 1920 has become a disease that can be controlled with a possibility to lead a long productive life. Over the past century, the great discovery of Banting, Best and Collip has forever changed the world and saved millions of lives. This review is devoted to the history of the development of insulin and its further improvement: from the moment of discovery to the present days. Various generations of insulin are considered: from animals to modern ultrashort and basal analogues. The article ends with a brief review of current trends in the development of new delivery methods and the development of new insulin molecules. Over the past century, insulin therapy has come a long way, which has significantly improved the quality of life of our patients. But research is actively continuing, including in the field of alternative methods of insulin delivery, which are more convenient for the patient, as well as in the development of «smart» molecules that will have a glucose-dependent effect.

Characteristics of contemporary drug clinical trials regarding the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a chronic liver disease, has no United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs for treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To examine fundamental characteristics of drug clinical trials for NASH treatment on the global clinical trials registry platform.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of clinical trials with NASH as medical condition that are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Relevant trial entries registered before and on October 7th, 2022, were downloaded, deduplicated, and reviewed. NCT numbers, titles, locations, funder types, statuses, durations, study designs, subject information, conditions, interventions, outcome measures were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 268 drug clinical trials were included in this study. Majority of the trials are conducted in United States (42.2 %). Most of the trials are funded by industry (67.9 %). The earliest initiated trials date back to 2001. Most trials are phase 2 (56.3 %), randomized (84.0 %), parallel assignment (78.7 %), and quadruple blind (40.3 %). The most concerned combined medical conditions are non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD, 20.9 %). The most involved mechanisms of action drug categories are farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists, with the most tested drugs being the FXR agonist EDP-305 and the Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist semaglutide.

CONCLUSION

Old drugs are further repurposed for testing in NASH treatment, novel drugs are developed to try to cure NASH. We expect that the drug clinical trials will accelerate the frontier of therapeutic development in NASH, bring an innovative and efficacious medication therapeutic approach to prevent the development and progression of NASH, or even reverse NASH.

Safety and efficacy of an oral insulin (Capsulin) in patients with early-stage type 2 diabetes: A dose-ranging phase 2b study

AIM

To compare the pharmacodynamic properties of different doses of regular human insulin administered in capsule form twice daily in a randomised twelve-week open-label study.

METHODS

A total of 100 individuals (48 males, 52 females) with type 2 diabetes on metformin completed the study according to the protocol. The mean (SD) age was 48.5 (6.7) years, body mass index 25.7 (2.8) kg/m² and HbA1c 8.10% (0.65%). Subjects randomized upon admission were assigned to one of three groups receiving formulated regular insulin at dose levels of 75 iu BD, 150 iu insulin BD, or 300 iu BD, all in enteric-coated capsules. The primary and secondary endpoints were change from baseline in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), respectively.

RESULTS

The study met its primary clinical endpoint of a decrease in HbA1c of 0.5% or higher (least square mean decrease 0.52%; P = .004, median decrease 0.6%) in the dose group receiving 150 iu BD. In a subset of this population, with starting HbA1c values of 9% to 9.5%, an average decrease of 1.575% was observed. In the total population, least square mean decreases in HbA1c for the 75 and 300 iu BD groups were -0.11% and -0.42%, respectively. Mean change in FPG in the 150 iu BD dose group was -18.8 mg/dl (P = .017) and -14.8 and -2.7 mg/dl for the 75 and 300 iu BD groups, respectively. A decrease of 20% for triglycerides (-40 mg/dl) was observed in the 150 iu BD dose group. No significant increases in body weight were observed, and significant decreases in systolic blood pressure were seen in all groups. No serious treatment-related adverse events were recorded, and no incidence of hypoglycaemia was reported throughout the entire 12-week study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Capsulin oral insulin administered twice per day at a dose of 150 iu per capsule is safe, with no confirmed treatment-linked hypoglycaemic events, and results in significant decreases from baseline in HbA1c, FPG and triglycerides.

Oral insulin (ORMD-0801) in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A dose-finding 12-week randomized placebo-controlled study

AIMS

To assess the safety and efficacy of multiple daily doses of oral insulin (ORMD-0801) in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) over 12 weeks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants with T2DM on metformin or combination oral therapy with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥ 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) were randomized to receive ORMD-0801 8 mg or 16 mg once (QD) or twice (BID) daily, or 32 mg QD, BID or three times daily (TID) over a 12-week period.

RESULTS

A total of 373 subjects were randomized to active treatment or placebo (~60% male, age ~ 56 years, HbA1c 9%-9.8%; 75-84 mmol/mol). Placebo-adjusted HbA1c changes from baseline to Week 12 were observed with ORMD-0801 8 mg BID (-7.15 ± 3.57 mmol/mol [-0.65% ± 0.33%]; P = 0.046). However, a significant site interaction was observed in two sites. After excluding these, HbA1c reduction was observed with 8 mg QD (-0.81 ± 0.37%; -8.89 ± 4.01 mmol/mol; P = 0.028, n = 15), 8 mg BID (-0.82 ± 0.37%; -8.95 ± 4.08 mmol/mol; P = 0.029, n = 17), 32 mg QD (-0.54 ± 0.26%; -5.89 ± 2.78 mmol/mol;P = 0.036, n = 69) and 32 mg BID (-0.53 ± 0.26%; -5.80 ± 2.83 mmol/mol; P = 0.042, n = 68). No effect was observed with 16 mg QD (0.25 ± 0.37%; 2.76 ± 3.99 mmol/mol; P = 0.48, n = 18), 16 mg BID (-0.36 ± 0.40%; -3.97 ± P = 0.36, n = 15) or 32 mg TID (-0.45 ± 0.27%, -4.89 ± 2.90 mmol/mol; P = 0.093, n = 69). Continuous glucose monitor and serum glucose measurements showed similar trends but were not significant. ORMD-0801 was safe, well tolerated and not associated with weight gain or hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral insulin (ORMD-0801) induced greater reductions in HbA1c when compared to placebo, and was safe and well tolerated in individuals with uncontrolled T2DM. The efficacy and safety findings support continued development of the 8-mg dose at bedtime, which is currently being evaluated in two Phase 3 trials.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: a review of phase 2 clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Despite therapeutic advances in the field of diabetes management since the discovery of insulin 100 years ago, there are still unmet clinical needs for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

AREAS COVERED

Genetic testing and islet autoantibodies testing allow researchers to design prevention studies. This review discusses the emerging therapy for prevention of T1DM, disease modification therapy in early course of T1DM, and therapies and technologies for established T1DM. We focus on phase 2 clinical trials with promising results, thus avoiding the exhausted list of every new therapy for T1DM.

EXPERT OPINION

Teplizumab has demonstrated potential as a preventative agent for individuals at risk prior to the onset of overt dysglycemia. However, these agents are not without side effects, and there are uncertainties on long-term safety. Technological advances have led a substantial influence on quality of life of people suffering from T1DM. There remains variation in uptake of new technologies across the globe. Novel insulins (ultra-long acting), oral insulin, and inhaled insulin attempt to narrow the gap of unmet needs. Islet cell transplant is another exciting field, and stem cell therapy might have potential to provide unlimited supply of islet cells.

The Future of Diabetes Therapies: New Insulins and Insulin Delivery Systems, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Analogs, and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Type 2 Inhibitors, and Beta Cell Replacement Therapy

As the prevalence of diabetes mellitus increases, so too does the number of available treatment modalities. Many diabetic therapies available in human medicine or on the horizon could hold promise in the management of small animal diabetes. However, it is important to consider how species differences in pathophysiology, management practices and goals, and lifestyle may affect the translation of such treatment modalities for veterinary use. This review article aimed to familiarize veterinarians with the more promising novel diabetic therapies and explore their possible applications in the treatment of canine and feline diabetes mellitus.

An overview of oral insulin delivery strategies (OIDS)

Despite tremendous efforts, the world continues its fight against the common chronic disease-diabetes. Diabetes is caused by elevated glucose levels in the blood, which can lead to several complications like glaucoma, cataract, kidney failure, diabetic ketoacidosis, heart attack, and stroke. According to recent statistics, China, India, and the US rank at the top three positions with regards to the number of patients affected by diabetes. Ever since its discovery, insulin is one of the major therapeutic molecules that is used to control the disease in the diabetic population, worldwide. The most common route of insulin administration has been the subcutaneous route. However, the limitations associated with this route have motivated global efforts to explore alternative strategies to deliver insulin, including pulmonary, transdermal, nasal, rectal, buccal, and oral routes. Oral insulin delivery is the most convenient and patient-centered route. However, the oral route is also associated with numerous drawbacks that present significant challenges to the scientific fraternity. The human physiological system acts as a formidable barrier to insulin, limiting its bioavailability. The present review covers the major barriers against oral insulin delivery and explains formulation strategies that have been adopted to overcome these barriers. The review focuses on oral insulin delivery strategies (OIDS) for increasing the bioavailability of oral insulin, including nanoparticles, microparticles, nano-in-microparticles, hydrogels, tablets, capsules, intestinal patches, and use of ionic liquids. It also highlights some of the notable recent advancements and clinical trials in oral insulin delivery. This formulation based OIDS may significantly improve patient compliance in the treatment of diabetes.

Insulin analogs in the treatment of type II diabetes and future perspectives

The discovery of insulin by Banting and Best marked 100 years in 2021, and it was a life-saving treatment modality for type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Insulin is a natural hormone that has been used extensively in T2DM patients since its discovery. Currently, insulin analogs are also available in different formulations for T2DM management, overcoming the limitations of human insulin with better safety and side effect profiles. The insulin analogs like the rapid-acting analogs (Aspart, lispro, glulisine), the long-acting basal analogs (Glargine, detemir), the ultra-long acting (Insulin degludec), and the premixed insulin analog formulations (75% Neutral protamine lispro, 25% lispro; 50% neutral protamine lispro, 50% lispro; 70% protamine aspart, 30% aspart) have been prepared through genetic engineering while preserving the basic insulin profile. A large number of studies have demonstrated their clinical effects on glycated hemoglobin test (HbA1c) in achieving glycemic control and thereby lowering the microvascular and macrovascular complications of T2DM with less traditional side effects of regular human insulin, mainly the risk of hypoglycemia, postprandial glycemic excursions, and weight gain. This review explores the currently available insulin analogs, their clinical implications, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety profile, and cost-effectiveness. We also discuss the future developments in the management of T2DM, especially the scientific advancements surrounding the novel insulin formulations, including the biosimilar insulin, and the innovative insulin delivery methods, such as oral and inhaled insulin.

Potentials of Neuropeptides as Therapeutic Agents for Neurological Diseases

Despite recent leaps in modern medicine, progress in the treatment of neurological diseases remains slow. The near impermeable blood-brain barrier (BBB) that prevents the entry of therapeutics into the brain, and the complexity of neurological processes, limits the specificity of potential therapeutics. Moreover, a lack of etiological understanding and the irreversible nature of neurological conditions have resulted in low tolerability and high failure rates towards existing small molecule-based treatments. Neuropeptides, which are small proteinaceous molecules produced by the body, either in the nervous system or the peripheral organs, modulate neurological function. Although peptide-based therapeutics originated from the treatment of metabolic diseases in the 1920s, the adoption and development of peptide drugs for neurological conditions are relatively recent. In this review, we examine the natural roles of neuropeptides in the modulation of neurological function and the development of neurological disorders. Furthermore, we highlight the potential of these proteinaceous molecules in filling gaps in current therapeutics.

Insulin discovery: A pivotal point in medical history

The discovery of insulin in 1921 - due to the efforts of the Canadian research team based in Toronto - has been a landmark achievement in the history of medicine. Lives of people with diabetes were changed forever, considering that in the pre-insulin era this was a deadly condition. Insulin, right after its discovery, became the first hormone to be purified for human use, the first to be unraveled in its amino acid sequence and to be synthetized by DNA-recombinant technique, the first to be modified in its amino acid sequence to modify its duration of action. As such the discovery of insulin represents a pivotal point in medical history. Since the early days of its production, insulin has been improved in its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties in the attempt to faithfully reproduce diurnal physiologic plasma insulin fluctuations. The evolution of insulin molecule has been paralleled by evolution in the way the hormone is administered. Once-weekly insulins will be available soon, and glucose-responsive "smart" insulins start showing their potential in early clinical studies. The first century of insulin as therapy was marked by relentless search for better formulations, a search that has not stopped yet. New technologies may have, indeed, the potential to provide further improvement of safety and efficacy of insulin therapy and, therefore, contribute to improvement of the quality of life of people with diabetes.

Trends in Antidiabetic Drug Discovery: FDA Approved Drugs, New Drugs in Clinical Trials and Global Sales

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) continues to be a substantial medical problem due to its increasing global prevalence and because chronic hyperglycemic states are closely linked with obesity, liver disease and several cardiovascular diseases. Since the early discovery of insulin, numerous antihyperglycemic drug therapies to treat diabetes have been approved, and also discontinued, by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). To provide an up-to-date account of the current trends of antidiabetic pharmaceuticals, this review offers a comprehensive analysis of the main classes of antihyperglycemic compounds and their mechanisms: insulin types, biguanides, sulfonylureas, meglitinides (glinides), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs), thiazolidinediones (TZD), incretin-dependent therapies, sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and combinations thereof. The number of therapeutic alternatives to treat T2DM are increasing and now there are nearly 60 drugs approved by the FDA. Beyond this there are nearly 100 additional antidiabetic agents being evaluated in clinical trials. In addition to the standard treatments of insulin therapy and metformin, there are new drug combinations, e.g., containing metformin, SGLT2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, that have gained substantial use during the last decade. Furthermore, there are several interesting alternatives, such as lobeglitazone, efpeglenatide and tirzepatide, in ongoing clinical trials. Modern drugs, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, DPP4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors have gained popularity on the pharmaceutical market, while less expensive over the counter alternatives are increasing in developing economies. The large heterogeneity of T2DM is also creating a push towards more personalized and accessible treatments. We describe several interesting alternatives in ongoing clinical trials, which may help to achieve this in the near future.

One-hundred year evolution of prandial insulin preparations: From animal pancreas extracts to rapid-acting analogs

The first insulin preparation injected in humans in 1922 was short-acting, extracted from animal pancreas, contaminated by impurities. Ever since the insulin extracted from animal pancreas has been continuously purified, until an unlimited synthesis of regular human insulin (RHI) became possible in the '80s using the recombinant-DNA (rDNA) technique. The rDNA technique then led to the designer insulins (analogs) in the early '90s. Rapid-acting insulin analogs were developed to accelerate the slow subcutaneous (sc) absorption of RHI, thus lowering the 2-h post-prandial plasma glucose (PP-PG) and risk for late hypoglycemia as comparing with RHI. The first rapid-acting analog was lispro (in 1996), soon followed by aspart and glulisine. Rapid-acting analogs are more convenient than RHI: they improve early PP-PG, and 24-h PG and A1C as long as basal insulin is also optimized; they lower the risk of late PP hypoglycemia and they allow a shorter time-interval between injection and meal. Today rapid-acting analogs are the gold standard prandial insulins. Recently, even faster analogs have become available (faster aspart, ultra-rapid lispro) or are being studied (Biochaperone lispro), making additional gains in lowering PP-PG. Rapid-acting analogs are recommended in all those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes who need prandial insulin replacement.

Formulation of biologics for alternative routes of administration: Current problems and perspectives

Introduction: Biologics (biopharmaceuticals) present new promising therapies for many diseases such as cancers, chronical inflammatory diseases and today's biggest challenge - COVID-19. Research: Today, most biologics have been synthetized using modern methods of biotechnology, in particular DNA recombinant technology. Current pharmaceutical forms of protein/peptide biopharmaceuticals are intended for parenteral route of administration due to their instability and large size of molecules. In order to improve patient compliance, many companies are working on developing adequate forms of biopharmaceuticals for alternative, non-invasive routes of administration. The aim of this work is to review current aspirations and problems in formulation of biopharmaceuticals for alternative (non-parenteral) routes of administration and to review the attempts to overcome them. These alternative routes of administration could be promising in prevention and treatment of COVID-19, among other serious diseases. Conclusion: The emphasis is on stabilizing monoclonal antibodies into special formulations and delivery systems; their application should be safer, more comfortable and reliable. When it comes to hormones, vaccines and smaller peptides, some companies have already registered drugs intended for nasal and oral delivery.

Novel Drugs for Diabetes Therapy

Since the first use of insulin 100 years ago, there have been marked improvements in diabetes therapy including, but not limited to, the development of oral antidiabetic agents (OADs), incretin mimetics and insulin analogues. Still, there are substantial shortcomings in diabetes therapy: the blood-glucose lowering effect of OADs is often limited, incretin mimetics often induce gastrointestinal side effects and insulins still induce hypoglycaemia and weight gain in many patients.This review evaluates on-going developments of antidiabetic drugs for their potential for future therapy focussing on injectable therapies. Recent data from dual agonists, in particular tirzepatide, a combination of GIP- and GLP-1 receptor agonists, show unprecedented reductions in HbA1c, body weight and cardiovascular risk factors. Once-weekly administrations of incretin mimetics open up the potential of a combination with once-weekly insulins that have been shown to have low peak-to-trough fluctuations. Eventually, it might be feasible to administer incretins and insulins (combinations) orally. While this has already been achieved for incretins, there are still some challenges for the oral application of insulin. Nevertheless, many promising data of novel antidiabetic drugs clearly indicate that therapy of people with diabetes will become easier, safer and more efficacious in the next years.