Modified gastric pull-up reconstructions following pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy

Machine learning approach to predict tracheal necrosis after total pharyngolaryngectomy

BACKGROUND

Tracheal necrosis is a potentially severe complication of total pharyngolarynjectomy (TPL), sometimes combined with total esophagectomy. The risk factors for tracheal necrosis after TPL without total esophagectomy remain unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 395 patients who underwent TPL without total esophagectomy. Relevant factors associated with tracheal necrosis were evaluated using random forest machine learning and traditional multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Tracheal necrosis occurred in 25 (6.3%) patients. Both the models identified almost the same factors relevant to tracheal necrosis. History of radiotherapy was the most important predicting and significant risk factor in both models. Paratracheal lymph node dissection and total thyroidectomy with TPL were also relevant. Random forest model was able to predict tracheal necrosis with an accuracy of 0.927.

CONCLUSIONS

Random forest is useful in predicting tracheal necrosis. Countermeasures should be considered when creating a tracheostoma, particularly in patients with identified risk factors.

A Nationwide Survey on Digestive Reconstruction Following Pharyngolaryngectomy With Total Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan

AIM

Digestive reconstruction after pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy (PLTE) remains challenging, with the optimal method remaining unclear. The current study aimed to clarify the short-term outcomes after PLTE and determine the optimal digestive reconstruction method.

METHODS

Based on a nationwide survey of 151 patients who underwent PLTE, outcomes of digestive reconstruction methods are described.

RESULTS

Among digestive reconstruction methods, a simple gastric tube was most frequently used (37.1%), followed by gastric tube combined with free graft transfer (FGT) (35.1%), gastric tube with microvascular anastomosis (22.5%), and other procedures (5.3%). Intraoperative evaluation of microcirculation (IOEM) was utilized in 29 patients (19.2%). Among the included patients, 66.9% developed any-grade complications, 41.0% developed severe complications, and 23.8% developed digestive reconstruction-related complications (DRRCs; leakage or necrosis). Reoperation within 30 days for any complications and DRRCs was required in 13.9% and 8.6% of the patients, respectively. Mortality within 90 days was observed in 4.6%. Among the three major methods, gastric tube combined with FGT promoted the least DRRCs in the gastric tube (P = .005), although the overall incidence of DRRCs was comparable. The use of IOEM was significantly associated with a reduction of severe DRRCs (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy is a high-risk surgery significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, the addition of FGT can help prevent gastric tip complications, while IOEM can be an effective method for improving outcomes.

Influence of Damaged Stomach on Anastomotic Leakage following Cervical Esophagogastrostomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most common complications after esophagectomy. Although some patients have a history of peptic ulcers or other prior stomach diseases, the influence of a damaged stomach (DS) on AL incidence remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the association between DS and incidence of AL in patients who underwent esophagectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2015 and 2019, a total of 447 consecutive patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy using gastric tube following esophagectomy were enrolled. DS was defined on the basis of endoscopic findings of ulcers or scars due to medical history or prior treatment. We compared the incidence of AL between patients with DS and those with a healthy stomach (HS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors that could predict AL incidence.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (11.4%) had DS. Causes of DS included peptic ulcer (n = 36), endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer (n = 9), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (n = 5), and post-chemotherapy scar for gastric malignant lymphoma (n = 1). Overall, AL occurred in 35 patients (7.8%). The incidence of AL in the DS group was significantly higher than in the HS group (15.7 vs. 6.8%, p = 0.03). DS was one of the independent predictive factors for AL (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-6.92; p = 0.03) on multivariate analysis. Further, the diseases in the lower third of the conduit were associated with AL.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of DS can predict AL in patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy.

Digestive Reconstruction After Pharyngolaryngectomy with Total Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy (PLTE) is often indicated for patients with synchronous head and neck cancer and thoracic esophageal cancer or those with head and neck cancer extending to the upper mediastinum. A long conduit is required for the reconstruction, and the blood flow at the tip of the conduit is not always sufficient. Thus, reconstructive surgery after PLTE remains challenging, and optimal reconstruction methods have not been elucidated to date.

METHODS

This analysis investigated 65 patients who underwent PLTE. The short-term outcomes among the procedures were compared to explore the optimal digestive reconstruction methods.

RESULTS

We used a simple gastric conduit for 7 patients, a gastric conduit with microvascular anastomosis (MVA) for 10 patients, an elongated gastric conduit with an MVA for 20 patients, a gastric conduit combined with a free jejunum transfer (FJT) for 25 patients, and other procedures for 3 patients. Postoperatively, 17 (26.2%) of the patients experienced severe complications, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 3b or higher, including graft failure for 3 patients (6.2%). Anastomotic leakage was found in six patients (9.2%), and all leakages occurred at the pharyngogastric anastomosis. The reoperation rate was 15.4% (n = 10), and three patients (4.6%) died of massive bleeding from major vessels. The patients who underwent simple gastric conduit more frequently had graft failure (P = 0.04), anastomotic leakage (P < 0.01), and reoperation (P = 0.04) than the patients treated with the other reconstructive methods.

CONCLUSION

Additional procedures such as MVA, gastric tube elongation, and FJT contribute to improving the outcomes of reconstruction after PLTE.

Postoperative Complication Assessments of Different Reconstruction Procedures after Total Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy: Tubular Gastric Pull-Up versus Whole Gastric Pull-Up

Hypopharynx carcinoma tends to be diagnosed at advanced stage and usually has a poor prognosis because of the high incidence of submucosal spreading and lymphatic metastasis. Total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy (PLE) is mostly used as a curative intervention for this deadly disease, and a commonly used reconstruction method after PLE is gastric pull-up, which could be further divided into tubular gastric pull-up and whole gastric pull-up procedures. Aiming to achieve a precise guidance on optimal reconstruction method after PLE, the present study evaluated the postoperative complications involving in different gastric pull-up procedures in patients with hypopharynx cancer. A total of 52 consecutive patients with hypopharyngeal cancer who underwent total PLE with gastric pull-up reconstruction in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between 1996 and 2014 were analyzed in this study. Of these patients, 28 underwent tubular gastric pull-up reconstruction procedure (Group A), whereas 24 underwent whole gastric pull-up reconstruction procedure (Group B). We compared the postoperative complications between these two groups retrospectively. Postoperative anastomotic fistulas occurred in three patients in Group A (3/28) versus eight patients in Group B (8/24), leading to an incidence rate of 10.71 and 33.33 per cent, respectively. The incidence of intrathoracic stomach syndrome was 21.43 per cent in Group A (6/28) versus 58.33 per cent in Group B (14/24), and the incidence of reflux was 35.71 per cent in Group A (10/28) versus 66.67 per cent in Group B (16/24). All of the above postoperative complications exhibited statistical differences between two groups ( P ≤ 0.05). This retrospective observation study suggests that compared with whole gastric pull-up, tubular gastric pull-up is a better reconstruction procedure of choice after PLE, evidenced by reduced incidences of postoperative anastomotic fistula, intrathoracic stomach syndrome, and reflux.

Esophageal reconstruction after oncological total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy: Algorithmic approach

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction for total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy is accomplished mainly by gastrointestinal transposition but can be complicated by anastomotic tension or associated neck-skin defect. Here, we present the results of total esophageal reconstruction by gastrointestinal transposition alone or with additional free tissue transfer and propose an algorithm accordingly.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who had oncologic total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy between January 2012 and January 2016. Twenty-four men and one woman were included with a mean age of 54 (range, 41-72) years. Patients were grouped by reconstruction into the gastric pull-up (GP, n = 15), colon interposition (CI, n = 2), GP combined with free jejunal flap (GPFJ, n = 6), or GP combined with anterolateral thigh flap (GPALT, n = 2) group to compare clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 1037.3 minutes and was significantly longer in the GPALT group than in the GP group (1235.0 ± 50.0 minutes vs. 929.7 ± 137.7 minutes, p =.009). All flaps survived. After a mean follow-up of 18 months, the overall leakage, stricture, and successful swallowing rates were 44%, 4%, and 76%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the leakage (53.3%, 50.0%, 16.7%, and 50.0%, p =.581), stricture (6.7%, 0%, 0%, and 0%, p = 1.000), or successful swallowing (73.3%, 50.0%, 83.3%, and 100%, p =.783) rates between GP, CI, GPFJ, and GPALT groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed algorithm that ranks gastric pull-up as a priority and uses additional free tissue transfer to overcome the anastomotic tension or associated neck-skin defect is feasible.

Comparison of synchronous versus staged surgeries for patients with synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and head-and-neck

Esophageal and head and neck (H&N) cancers often occur synchronously, this study aimed to clarify the benefits and disadvantages of synchronous and staged operations for double H&N/esophagus cancers. We retrospectively reviewed 43 patients with synchronous double cancer of H&N and esophagus treated between July 2005 and July 2014, of whom 33 patients underwent synchronous operation (SYN) and 10 underwent staged operations (STG). We compared the short-term outcomes between the groups. Operation time was longer, amount of blood loss was larger, and hospital stay was longer in the SYN group than in each single surgery of the STG group. Incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the groups. Tracheal necrosis was observed only in the SYN group. One patient died because of postoperative bleeding in the SYN group, whereas no mortality was seen in the STG group. Both the peripheral white blood cell counts and serum CRP levels during postoperative period were significantly higher in the SYN group than each single surgery of STG group. The staged surgery strategy for patients with synchronous esophagus/H&N cancers can attenuate surgical stress and thus may increase safety.

Revisiting the gastric pull-up for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality and morbidity

Gastric pull-up (GPU) is among the oldest techniques for reconstructing the pharyngoesophageal junction following cancer resection. This review examines morbidity and mortality rates following GPU pharyngoesophageal junction reconstruction from 1959 until present: 77 studies, 2,705 patients. The odds of mortality, anastomotic complications, and other complications decreased by 37.2% (95%CI = 28.0-45.3%; P < 0.0001), 8.0% (95%CI = -2.1 to 17.1%; P = 0.12), 21.0% (95%CI 3.5-35.2%; P = 0.021) per decade respectively. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:907-914. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Salvage pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy

Historically, total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy has been the standard radical surgical treatment for synchronous cancer of the thoracoabdominal esophagus and pharyngolaryngeal region, and for cancer of the cervical esophagus that has invaded as far as the thoracic esophagus. Although definitive chemoradiotherapy that enables preservation of the larynx has often been the first choice of treatment for cancers involving the cervical esophagus, total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy is required as a salvage therapy for cases involving failure of complete remission or locoregional recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. However, salvage esophageal surgery after definitive high-dose chemoradiotherapy is generally associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine the short-term outcome of salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy. From 2001 to 2014, nine patients underwent salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University. The mortality and morbidity rates were high at 22% and 89%, respectively. Four patients (44%) developed tracheal necrosis, which in two patients eventually led to lethal hemorrhage. Salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy is an uncommon and highly demanding surgical procedure that should be carefully planned and conducted in selected centers of excellence. Measures must be taken to preserve the tracheal blood supply, thus avoiding fatal complications.

Risk factors for complications after pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy (PLTE) is an effective surgical treatment for synchronous or metachronous hypopharyngeal or laryngeal cancer and thoracic esophageal cancer, although it is more invasive than esophagectomy and total pharyngolaryngectomy. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for complications after PLTE.

METHODS

From November 2002 to December 2014, a total of 8 patients underwent PLTE at the Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan. We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics, surgical procedures, and postoperative complications of these patients.

RESULTS

Of the 8 patients, 5 underwent one-stage PLTE and 3 underwent staged PLTE. There was no mortality in this study. Two cases of tracheal necrosis, two of anastomotic leakage, and one of ileus were observed as postoperative complications. Two patients who underwent one-stage PLTE with standard mediastinal lymph node dissection developed tracheal necrosis and severe anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSION

One-stage PLTE and standard mediastinal lymph node dissection were identified as the risk factors for severe postoperative complications. Staged PLTE or transhiatal esophagectomy should be considered when PLTE is performed and standard mediastinal lymph node dissection should be avoided when one-stage PLTE is performed with transthoracic esophagectomy.

Salvage Procedures after Total Necrosis of a Free Jejunal Graft

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To determine the appropriate salvage method after total necrosis of a jejunal graft after reconstruction of total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy or a larynx-preserving operation, considering the complexity of medical service in China.

PROCEDURES

We reviewed 5 patients with a mean age of 61 years who developed total jejunal graft necrosis and underwent reconstruction of a free jejunal transfer in our hospital. The total number and choice of salvage procedures, the symptoms and the results of salvage for the 5 patients have been reviewed.

RESULTS

Four of the 5 patients survived. One of them underwent gastric pull-up reconstruction and recovered well. One patient died due to severe infection after the loss of the jejunal graft and secondary gastric pull-up reconstruction. A temporary external fistula was formed in 3 patients after the initial jejunal graft necrosis, 2 of which underwent fistula repair 6 and 5 months later, while one went on long-term gastric tube feeding.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that a temporary external fistula formation is an optional secondary salvage procedure after total necrosis of an initial jejunal graft, considering the relatively low quality of medical service in China.