Studies on the regulation of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) by acid in the esophagus and stomach

Positive effect of deep diaphragmatic breathing training on gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough: a clinical randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of deep diaphragmatic breathing training (DEP) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough (GERC).

METHODS

A randomized controlled study was conducted involving 60 GERC patients who were divided into the intervention group and the control group (each with 30 patients). Both groups received routine medication treatment for GERC, while the intervention group received DEP training additionally. Both groups were evaluated by cough symptom scores, Hull airway reflux questionnaire (HARQ), gastroesophageal reflux diagnostic questionnaire (GerdQ), generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 (GAD-7), patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), the Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ), as well as capsaicin cough sensitivity testing, B-ultrasound and surface electromyography (sEMG) of the diaphragmatic muscles before and after treatment. The cough resolution rate and changes of the above indictors was compared between the two groups after eight weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

After eight weeks of treatment, cough symptoms improved in both groups, but the cough resolution rate in the intervention group of 94% was significantly higher than that in the control group of 77% (χ2 = 6.402, P = 0.041). The intervention group showed significant improvements to the control group in GerdQ (6.13(0.35) VS 6.57(0.77)), GAD-7 (0(0;1) VS 1(0;3)), PSQI (2(1;3) VS 4(3;6)), LCQ (17.19(1.56) VS 15.88(1.92)) and PHQ-9 (0(0;0) VS 0(0;3)) after treatment. Compared to control group, sEMG activity of the diaphragmatic muscle was significantly increased in the intervention group after treatment, measured during DEP (79.00(2.49) VS 74.65 (1.93)) and quiet breathing (72.73 (1.96) VS 67.15 (2.48)).

CONCLUSION

DEP training can improve cough symptoms as an adjunctive treatment in GERC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered in February 2, 2022 via the Chinese Clinical Trials Register ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/ ) [ChiCTR2200056246].

Different Traditional Herbal Medicines for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Adults

Background/Aims

Traditional Herbal Medicines (THM) have been being used for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) for a long time, but clinical evidence is still scarce. We evaluated different THM prescriptions for GERD in adults.

Methods

Data added to nine online databases from their inception to November 30, 2019, were systematically searched. All relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included and were combined with Bayesian network analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool and GRADE profiler version 3.6 were respectively employed to evaluate the quality of evidence of outcomes.

Results

Seventeen publications involving 1441 participants were retrieved. The results of our analysis suggested that Jianpi therapy+proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and Ligan Hewei therapy respectively ranked first in overall clinical efficacy and efficacy under gastroscope; Ligan Hewei therapy+PPIs was the optimum intervention in the improvement of acid regurgitation and heartburn.

Conclusion

This research indicates that Ligan Hewei therapy and Jianpi therapy, or these therapies separately combined with PPIs, should be recommended as appropriate complementary and alternative treatments based on the specific characteristics of GERD. However, additional well-designed RCTs with high methodological quality are still needed for future research.

Magnetic sphincter augmentation: Optimal patient selection and referral care pathways

Outcomes associated with magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been reported, however the optimal population for MSA and the related patient care pathways have not been summarized. This Minireview presents evidence that describes the optimal patient population for MSA, delineates diagnostics to identify these patients, and outlines opportunities for improving GERD patient care pathways. Relevant publications from MEDLINE/EMBASE and guidelines were identified from 2000-2018. Clinical experts contextualized the evidence based on clinical experience. The optimal MSA population may be the 2.2-2.4% of GERD patients who, despite optimal medical management, continue experiencing symptoms of heartburn and/or uncontrolled regurgitation, have abnormal pH, and have intact esophageal function as determined by high resolution manometry. Diagnostic work-ups include ambulatory pH monitoring, high-resolution manometry, barium swallow, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. GERD patients may present with a range of typical or atypical symptoms. In addition to primary care providers (PCPs) and gastroenterologists (GIs), other specialties involved may include otolaryngologists, allergists, pulmonologists, among others. Objective diagnostic testing is required to ascertain surgical necessity for GERD. Current referral pathways for GERD management are suboptimal. Opportunities exist for enabling patients, PCPs, GIs, and surgeons to act as a team in developing evidence-based optimal care plans.

Association of serum gastric inhibitory polypeptide and pancreatic polypeptide levels with prolonged esophageal acid exposure time in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Acid exposure time (AET) prolongation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) participate in the regulation of gastric acid secretion, blood glucose and lipid levels, and food intake. In this study, we evaluated the serum GIP and PP levels in refractory GERD patients and analyzed their metabolic and motility characteristics.

METHODS

Seventy-three refractory GERD patients were enrolled in this study from September 2015 to September 2017. We investigated the clinical characteristics, severity, and duration of GERD symptoms. High-resolution manometry and 24 hours impedance-pH monitoring were performed to assess esophageal motility and reflux parameters. The patients were divided into the AET- group (AET <4.2%) and AET+ group (AET >4.2%). GIP and PP levels were determined in all subjects and their associations with other parameters evaluated.

RESULTS

Age and GERDQ score were significantly higher (P < .05) and acid reflux and heartburn more frequent in the AET+ group than in the AET- group. The contraction front velocity was increased in the AET- group, while there was no significant difference in the distal contraction integral, peristalsis interruption, distal latency, or resting pressures of the lower and upper esophageal sphincters between the 2 groups (P > .05). The serum levels of GIP (P = .003) and PP (P = .012) were significantly increased in the AET+ group. Increased GIP and PP levels were associated with abnormal upright AET (correlation coefficients 0.307 and 0.233, P = .008 and P = .047). There was a positive correlation between GIP and triglyceride levels (correlation coefficient 0.279, P = .017).

CONCLUSION

The serum levels of GIP and PP in refractory GERD patients with prolongation of AET are significantly elevated, mainly in the upright position.

Efficacy and Safety of Modified Banxia Xiexin Decoction (Pinellia Decoction for Draining the Heart) for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Modified Banxia Xiexin decoction (MBXD) is a classical Chinese herbal formula in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) for long time, but the efficacy of it is still controversial. This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBXD for the treatment of GERD in adults. The search strategy was carried out for publications in seven electronic databases. RevMan software version 5.3 and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool were performed for this review. Twelve RCTs were included for the analysis. The results of overall clinical efficacy and efficacy under gastroscope demonstrated that MBXD was superior to conventional western medicine. Meanwhile, the results of subgroup analysis showed clinical heterogeneity between the two groups. However, there was no statistically significant difference in acid regurgitation between the two groups. But in the improvement of heartburn and sternalgia, the results showed statistically significant differences for the comparison between two groups. In addition, the adverse reactions of the experiment groups were not different from those of the control groups. This systematic review indicates that MBXD may have potential effects on the treatment of patients with GERD. But because the evidence of methodological quality and sample sizes is weak, further standardized researches are required.

Effect of Severity of Esophageal Acidification on Sleep vs Wake Periods in Infants Presenting with Brief Resolved Unexplained Events

OBJECTIVES

To describe the pattern of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) events in wake and sleep states with increasing acid reflux index (ARI) in neonates and to test the hypothesis that GER-related symptoms are frequent in ARI >7% in wake state.

STUDY DESIGN

Infants underwent 24-hour pH-impedance studies with 6-hour concurrent video-polysomnography studies. Data were stratified based on the 24-hour ARI (% duration that esophageal pH is <4) into ARI < 3% (normal), ARI 3 ≥ to ≤7% (intermediate), and ARI >7% (abnormal). GER frequency, clearance mechanisms, and symptoms were distinguished during wake state and sleep state.

RESULTS

Total wake and sleep duration was similar (P ≥ .2) in all ARI groups. Acidic events were frequent with increasing ARI in wake state vs sleep state (P ≤ .03). The symptom index increased with increasing ARI (P ≤ .02) in both wake state and sleep state. Acid clearance time increased with increasing ARI in wake state (P ≤ .02). In ARI > 7% vs ARI ≤ 7%, frequency of acidic GER events was higher (P ≤ .02) in wake state and sleep state; proximal migration of acid (P = .03) and acid clearance time were higher in wake state (P = .0005) only. Symptom index was higher in ARI >7% vs ARI ≤ 7% in wake state (P < .0001), comparable in normal vs intermediate (P = .4), and higher in abnormal vs intermediate (P = .0004) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe esophageal acid exposure (ARI >7%) is associated with increased reflux-associated symptoms in wake state. Sleep state appears to be protective regardless of ARI, likely because of greater chemosensory thresholds. Attention to posture and movements during wake state can be helpful. Scrutiny for non-GER etiologies should occur for infants presenting with life-threatening symptoms.