1
|
Dellaportas D, Margaris I, Latsonas P, Pikouli A, Vlachos I, Papakonstantinou D, Pararas N, Nastos C, Myoteri D, Pikoulis E. Contemporary Role of Open Left Thoracoabdominal Approach in Esophageal Malignancy Treatment. Cureus 2024; 16:e62922. [PMID: 39040781 PMCID: PMC11262707 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the widespread use of minimally invasive techniques, open left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (LTE) can offer excellent visualization and adaptability. The current study aimed to present and evaluate the outcomes related to an open LTE in esophageal malignancy treatment. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis of data collected from two institutions was performed, including patients with distal esophageal or junctional tumors who underwent open LTE between November 2018 and December 2023. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were included (16 males; mean age 62.8 years). Postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (36%), with pulmonary complications being the most prevalent (seven patients; 32%). One patient experienced a clinical anastomotic leak. No reoperations or escalation to a higher level of care were required. In-hospital and 30-day mortality were zero. Tumor cells were found at the surgical margins in six patients (27%). The mean lymph node yield was 27. During the follow-up period, there were nine deaths and 11 cases of disease recurrence. Isolated locoregional recurrence was seen in five patients (23%). The one-year and two-year overall survival rates were 79% and 47%, respectively. CONCLUSION In selected cases, open LTE remains a valid and safe operation with acceptable morbidity and oncological efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dionysios Dellaportas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Ioannis Margaris
- 4th Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Panagiotis Latsonas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Anastasia Pikouli
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Iakovos Vlachos
- Department of Pathology, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Dimitrios Papakonstantinou
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Constantinos Nastos
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Despoina Myoteri
- Department of Pathology, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Emmanuel Pikoulis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Söderström H, Moons J, Nafteux P, Uzun E, Grimminger P, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Degisors S, Piessen G, Vanommeslaeghe H, Van Daele E, Cheong E, Gutschow CA, Vetter D, Schuring N, Gisbertz SS, Räsänen J. Major Intraoperative Complications During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8244-8250. [PMID: 37782412 PMCID: PMC10625950 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14340-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to be a feasible surgical technique in treating esophageal carcinoma. Postoperative complications have been extensively reviewed, but literature focusing on intraoperative complications is limited. The main objective of this study was to report major intraoperative complications and 90-day mortality during MIE for cancer. METHODS Data were collected retrospectively from 10 European esophageal surgery centers. All intention-to-treat, minimally invasive laparoscopic/thoracoscopic esophagectomies with gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal and GE junction cancers operated on between 2003 and 2019 were reviewed. Major intraoperative complications were defined as loss of conduit, erroneous transection of vascular structures, significant injury to other organs including bowel, heart, liver or lung, splenectomy, or other major complications including intubation injuries, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction. RESULTS Amongst 2862 MIE cases we identified 98 patients with 101 intraoperative complications. Vascular injuries were the most prevalent, 41 during laparoscopy and 19 during thoracoscopy, with injuries to 18 different vessels. There were 24 splenic vascular or capsular injuries, 11 requiring splenectomies. Four losses of conduit due to gastroepiploic artery injury and six bowel injuries were reported. Eight tracheobronchial lesions needed repair, and 11 patients had significant lung parenchyma injuries. There were 2 on-table deaths. Ninety-day mortality was 9.2%. CONCLUSIONS This study offers an overview of the range of different intraoperative complications during minimally invasive esophagectomy. Mortality, especially from intrathoracic vascular injuries, appears significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Söderström
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - J Moons
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Uzun
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - P Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - M D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Nilsson
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Hayami
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Degisors
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital C. Huriez Place de Verdun, Lille Cedex, France
| | - G Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital C. Huriez Place de Verdun, Lille Cedex, France
| | - H Vanommeslaeghe
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Van Daele
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Cheong
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS FT, Norwich, UK
| | - Ch A Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D Vetter
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Schuring
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Räsänen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zaslavsky A, Solomon D, Varon D, Israeli T, Amlinsky Y, Tamir S, Kashtan H. Incidence and Impact of Preoperative Hiatal Hernia in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma Undergoing Curative Surgical Resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2907-2919. [PMID: 38038853 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05872-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hiatal hernia (HH) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma. High positive margin rates and poor survival were described among HH patients undergoing esophagectomy. We sought to describe incidence and impact of HH on outcomes following esophagectomy. METHODS Patients who underwent esophagectomy 2012-2019 for esophago-junctional carcinoma were included. CT studies were blindly reviewed by two radiologists. A third radiologist reviewed cases of disagreement. Hernias ≥ 3 cm were included in the HH group. RESULTS Overall, 66 patients (33%) had HH ≥ 3 cm. The no hernia group included 12 patients (6%) with < 3 cm HH and 106 (53%) without HH. Preoperative variables were comparable among groups. Location of anastomosis was similar among cohorts and predominantly cervical (n = 97, 82.2% vs 61, 92.4%, p = 0.113). Postoperatively, HH patients had higher incidence of atrial dysrhythmia (n = 11, 16.7% vs n = 6, 5.1% p = 0.015). Rates of R0 resections were similar (n = 62, 93.9%, vs n = 113, 95.8%, p = 0.724). HH patients had higher rates of signet ring cell histology (n = 14, 21.2% vs n = 9, 7.6% p = 0.025); this was confirmed on subgroup analysis including only adenocarcinoma patients (n = 14, 28.6% vs n = 8, 12.3%, p = 0.042). On Cox regression analysis, HH was not associated with disease-free or overall survival (HR 1.308, p = 0.274 and HR .905, p = 0.722). CONCLUSIONS Patients with preoperative HH had higher rates of postoperative atrial dysrhythmias and signet ring cell features on pathology. In a population with predominant cervical anastomosis, positive margin rates were low and survival comparable among cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adi Zaslavsky
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Affiliated With the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Daniel Solomon
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Affiliated With the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Danielle Varon
- Department of Radiology, Rabin Medical Center, Affiliated With the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tal Israeli
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Affiliated With the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yelena Amlinsky
- Department of Radiology, Rabin Medical Center, Affiliated With the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shlomit Tamir
- Department of Radiology, Rabin Medical Center, Affiliated With the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hanoch Kashtan
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Affiliated With the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bîrlă R, Hoara P, Achim F, Dinca V, Ciuc D, Constantinoiu S, Constantin A. Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:1675-1690. [PMID: 37969407 PMCID: PMC10631441 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly indicated in the management of malignant disease. Although oesophagectomy is a difficult operation, with a long learning curve, there is actually a shift towards the laparoscopic/thoracoscopic/ robotic approach, due to the advantages of visualization, surgeon comfort (robotic surgery) and the possibility of the whole team to see the operation as well as and the operating surgeon. Although currently there are still many controversial topics, about the surgical treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinoma, such as the type of open or minimally invasive surgical approach, the type of oesophago-gastric resection, the type of lymph node dissection and others, the minimally invasive approach has proven to be a way to reduce postoperative complications of resection, especially by decreasing pulmonary complications. The implementation of new technologies allowed the widening of the range of indications for this type of surgical approach. The short-term and long-term results, as well as the benefits for the patient - reduced surgical trauma, quick and easy recovery - offer this type of surgical treatment the premises for future development. This article reviews the updates and perspectives on the minimally invasive approach for GOJ adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodica Bîrlă
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University, Bucharest 011172, Romania
| | - Petre Hoara
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 020021, Romania
| | - Florin Achim
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University, Bucharest 011172, Romania
| | - Valeriu Dinca
- Faculty of Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University, Bucharest 031593, Romania
| | - Diana Ciuc
- Faculty of Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University, Bucharest 031593, Romania
| | - Silviu Constantinoiu
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University, Bucharest 011172, Romania
| | - Adrian Constantin
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University, Bucharest 011172, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun S, Wang Z, Huang C, Li K, Liu X, Fan W, Zhang G, Li X. Different gastric tubes in esophageal reconstruction during esophagectomy. Esophagus 2023; 20:595-604. [PMID: 37490217 PMCID: PMC10495279 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-023-01021-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Esophagectomy is currently the mainstay of treatment for resectable esophageal carcinoma. Gastric grafts are the first substitutes in esophageal reconstruction. According to the different tailoring methods applied to the stomach, gastric grafts can be classified as whole stomach, subtotal stomach and gastric tube. Gastric-tube placement has been proven to be the preferred method, with advantages in terms of postoperative complications and long-term survival. In recent years, several novel methods involving special-shaped gastric tubes have been proposed, which have further decreased the incidence of perioperative complications. This article will review the progress and clinical application status of different types of gastric grafts from the perspectives of preparation methods, studies of anatomy and perioperative outcomes, existing problems and future outlook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaowu Sun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jian She Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China
| | - Zhulin Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jian She Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China
| | - Chunyao Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jian She Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China
| | - Kaiyuan Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jian She Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China
| | - Xu Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jian She Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China
| | - Wenbo Fan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jian She Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China
| | - Guoqing Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jian She Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
| | - Xiangnan Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jian She Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zheng F, Yang J, Zhang J, Li J, Fang W, Chen M. Efficacy and complications of single-port thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center experience. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16325. [PMID: 37770495 PMCID: PMC10539285 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41772-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The traditional surgical technique for esophageal cancer is mainly open esophagectomy. With the innovation of surgical instruments, it is necessary to re-optimize the minimally invasive surgery. Therefore, single-port thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (SPTE) is an important direction of development. This study retrospectively analyzed 202 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing SPTE. Surgical variables and postoperative complications were further evaluated. All procedures were performed using SPTE. The number of patients who received R0 resection was 201 (99.5%). The total number of resected lymph nodes during the whole operation was on average 32.01 ± 12.15, and the mean number of positive lymph nodes was 1.56 ± 2.51. In 170 cases (84.2%), intraoperative blood loss did not exceed 100 ml (ml), while 1 case had postoperative bleeding. Only 1 patient (0.5%) required reoperation after surgery. Postoperative complications included 42 cases of pneumonia (20.8%), 9 cases of anastomotic leak (4.5%), 7 cases of pleural effusion (3.8%), and 1 case (0.5%) of both pleural hemorrhage and acute gastrointestinal hemorrhagic ulcer. Besides, we also recorded the time to remove the drain tube, which averaged 9.13 ± 5.31 days. In our study, we confirmed that the application of SPTE in clinical practice is feasible, and that the postoperative complications are at a low level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Rd. Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Rd. Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiulong Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Rd. Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiancheng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Rd. Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Weimin Fang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Rd. Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
| | - Mingqiu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Rd. Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jung JO, de Groot EM, Kingma BF, Babic B, Ruurda JP, Grimminger PP, Hölzen JP, Chao YK, Haveman JW, van Det MJ, Rouanet P, Benedix F, Li H, Sarkaria I, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Boxel GI, Chiu P, Egberts JH, Sallum R, Immanuel A, Turner P, Low DE, Hubka M, Perez D, Strignano P, Biebl M, Chaudry MA, Bruns CJ, van Hillegersberg R, Fuchs HF. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:4466-4477. [PMID: 36808472 PMCID: PMC10234920 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09911-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, little is known regarding the optimal technique for the abdominal phase of RAMIE. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in both the abdominal and thoracic phase (full RAMIE) compared to laparoscopy during the abdominal phase (hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE). METHODS This retrospective propensity-score matched analysis of the International Upper Gastrointestinal International Robotic Association (UGIRA) database included 807 RAMIE procedures with intrathoracic anastomosis between 2017 and 2021 from 23 centers. RESULTS After propensity-score matching, 296 hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE patients were compared to 296 full RAMIE patients. Both groups were equal regarding intraoperative blood loss (median 200 ml versus 197 ml, p = 0.6967), operational time (mean 430.3 min versus 417.7 min, p = 0.1032), conversion rate during abdominal phase (2.4% versus 1.7%, p = 0.560), radical resection (R0) rate (95.6% versus 96.3%, p = 0.8526) and total lymph node yield (mean 30.4 versus 29.5, p = 0.3834). The hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE group showed higher rates of anastomotic leakage (28.0% versus 16.6%, p = 0.001) and Clavien Dindo grade 3a or higher (45.3% versus 26.0%, p < 0.001). The length of stay on intensive care unit (median 3 days versus 2 days, p = 0.0005) and in-hospital (median 15 days versus 12 days, p < 0.0001) were longer for the hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE group. CONCLUSIONS Hybrid laparoscopic RAMIE and full RAMIE were oncologically equivalent with a potential decrease of postoperative complications and shorter (intensive care) stay after full RAMIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-On Jung
- Department of General, Visceral and Tumor Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eline M de Groot
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Babic
- Department of General, Visceral and Tumor Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter P Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jens P Hölzen
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Yin-Kai Chao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Taoyuan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jan W Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Almelo, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Rouanet
- Department of Surgery, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Frank Benedix
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Hecheng Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Inderpal Sarkaria
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | - Gijs I van Boxel
- Department of General Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Philip Chiu
- Department of Surgery at Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Rubens Sallum
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Arul Immanuel
- Department of Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Turner
- Department of Oesophagogastric Surgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Donald E Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle, Seattle, USA
| | - Michal Hubka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle, Seattle, USA
| | - Daniel Perez
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paolo Strignano
- Department of General Surgery, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Asif Chaudry
- Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London, London, UK
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral and Tumor Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Hans F Fuchs
- Department of General, Visceral and Tumor Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paszt A, Simonka Z, Budai K, Horvath Z, Erdos M, Vas M, Ottlakan A, Nyari T, Szepes Z, Uhercsak G, Maraz A, Torday L, Tiszlavicz L, Olah J, Lazar G. Impact of neoadjuvant FLOT treatment of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer following surgical therapy. Front Surg 2023; 10:1148984. [PMID: 37077865 PMCID: PMC10106678 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1148984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionTherapeutic treatment for advanced-stage (T2–T4) gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy with subsequent surgical intervention.MethodNeoadjuvant oncological treatment for GEJ and gastric cancer previously consisted of the intravenous administration of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil (ECF) or epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) combination (Group 1). The new protocol (FLOT, F: 5-FU, L: leucovorin, O: oxaliplatin, T: docetaxel), included patients with resectable GEJ and gastric cancer who had a clinical stage cT2 or higher nodal positive cN+ disease (Group 2). Between 31 December 2008 and 31 October 2022, the effect of different oncological protocols in terms of surgical outcomes in cases of T2–T4 tumours were retrospectively evaluated. Results of randomly assigned patients from the earlier ECF/ECX protocol (n = 36) (Group 1) and the new FLOT protocol (n = 52) (Group 2) were compared. Effect of different neoadjuvant therapies on tumour regression, types of possible side effects, type of surgery, and oncological radicality of surgical procedures were analysed.ResultsWhen comparing the two groups, we found that in case of the FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Group 2, n = 52), complete regression was achieved in 13.95% of patients, whereas in the case of ECF/ECX (Group 1, n = 36), complete regression occurred in only 9.10% of patients. Furthermore, in the FLOT group, the mean number of lymph nodes removed was slightly higher (24.69 vs. 20.13 in the ECF/ECX group). In terms of the safety resection margin (proximal), no significant difference was found between the two treatment groups. Nausea and vomiting were the most common side effects. The occurrence of diarrhea was significantly higher in the FLOT group (p = 0.006). Leukopenia and nausea occurred more commonly with the old protocol (Group 1). The rate of neutropenia was lower following FLOT treatment (p = 0.294), with the lack of grade II and III cases. Anaemia occured at a significantly higher rate (p = 0.036) after the ECF/ECX protocol.ConclusionsAs a result of the FLOT neoadjuvant oncological protocol for advanced gastro-esophageal junction and gastric cancer, the rate of complete tumour regression increased significantly. The rate of side effects was also appreciably lower following the FLOT protocol. These results strongly suggest a significant advantage of the FLOT neoadjuvant treatment used before surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Attila Paszt
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Correspondence: Attila Paszt
| | - Zsolt Simonka
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Krisztina Budai
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zoltan Horvath
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Marton Erdos
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Marton Vas
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Aurel Ottlakan
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tibor Nyari
- Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zoltan Szepes
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Aniko Maraz
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Laszlo Torday
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Judit Olah
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gyorgy Lazar
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
den Boer RB, Jaspers TJM, de Jongh C, Pluim JPW, van der Sommen F, Boers T, van Hillegersberg R, Van Eijnatten MAJM, Ruurda JP. Deep learning-based recognition of key anatomical structures during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09990-z. [PMID: 36947221 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09990-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a deep learning algorithm for anatomy recognition in thoracoscopic video frames from robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) procedures using deep learning. BACKGROUND RAMIE is a complex operation with substantial perioperative morbidity and a considerable learning curve. Automatic anatomy recognition may improve surgical orientation and recognition of anatomical structures and might contribute to reducing morbidity or learning curves. Studies regarding anatomy recognition in complex surgical procedures are currently lacking. METHODS Eighty-three videos of consecutive RAMIE procedures between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively collected at University Medical Center Utrecht. A surgical PhD candidate and an expert surgeon annotated the azygos vein and vena cava, aorta, and right lung on 1050 thoracoscopic frames. 850 frames were used for training of a convolutional neural network (CNN) to segment the anatomical structures. The remaining 200 frames of the dataset were used for testing the CNN. The Dice and 95% Hausdorff distance (95HD) were calculated to assess algorithm accuracy. RESULTS The median Dice of the algorithm was 0.79 (IQR = 0.20) for segmentation of the azygos vein and/or vena cava. A median Dice coefficient of 0.74 (IQR = 0.86) and 0.89 (IQR = 0.30) were obtained for segmentation of the aorta and lung, respectively. Inference time was 0.026 s (39 Hz). The prediction of the deep learning algorithm was compared with the expert surgeon annotations, showing an accuracy measured in median Dice of 0.70 (IQR = 0.19), 0.88 (IQR = 0.07), and 0.90 (0.10) for the vena cava and/or azygos vein, aorta, and lung, respectively. CONCLUSION This study shows that deep learning-based semantic segmentation has potential for anatomy recognition in RAMIE video frames. The inference time of the algorithm facilitated real-time anatomy recognition. Clinical applicability should be assessed in prospective clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R B den Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T J M Jaspers
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - C de Jongh
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J P W Pluim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - F van der Sommen
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 19, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - T Boers
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 19, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - R van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M A J M Van Eijnatten
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:891-901. [PMID: 36038647 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09551-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have proposed that the totally mechanical Collard (TMC) method may reduce anastomotic leakage and stricture. This study aimed to compare the TMC method and the circular stapled (CS) method for cervical anastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer. METHODS From May 2017 to September 2020, 308 patients (165 in the CS group and 143 in the TMC group) were included in this study. The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stricture within 12 months. Propensity score matching was used to control potential selection bias. RESULTS Anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, and refractory stricture (≥ 3 dilations) occurred in 30 (9.7%), 28 (9.1%), and 18 (5.8%) patients, respectively. The rate of anastomotic leak was similar in the CS and TMC methods (9.7 vs. 9.8%; P = 0.978), but anastomotic stricture (3.5 vs. 13.9%; P = 0.001) and refractory stricture (2.8 vs. 9.1%, P = 0.022) occurred less frequently in the TMC method. Propensity score matching yielded 128 patient pairs and confirmed these results. Multivariable analyses found that CS method, anastomotic leakage, and diabetes were independent predictors for both anastomotic stricture and refractory stricture. Subgroup analysis revealed that for patients with anastomotic leakage, the postoperative hospital stay in the TMC group was significantly longer than that in the CS group. CONCLUSION In cervical anastomosis after MIE, the TMC method is superior to the CS method regarding anastomotic stricture and refractory stricture formation. However, compared to the CS method, the TMC method cannot lower the probability of anastomotic leakage, and anastomotic leakage with the TMC method requires a longer healing time.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sun HB, Jiang D, Liu XB, Xing WQ, Liu SL, Chen PN, Li P, Ma YX. Perioperative Outcomes and Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:17-26. [PMID: 36261780 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05484-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted McKeown esophagectomy (RAME) and the learning curves of surgeons performing RAME at a single center. METHODS Perioperative outcomes of RAME and video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy (VAME) were compared after eliminating confounding factors by propensity score matching (PSM). The cumulative sum (CUSUM) method was used to evaluate the learning curves of RAME for a single surgical team. RESULTS In general, a total of 198 patients with esophageal cancer (RAME: 45 patients, VAME: 153 patients) were included in this study, and 43 pairs of patients receiving RAME or VAME were matched using 1:1 PSM analysis. Those in the RAME group had more lymph nodes dissected in the total lymph nodes (median 29.0 vs. 26.0, P = 0.011) and the upper mediastinum (median 8.0 vs. 6.0, P < 0.001), especially the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node (median 4.0 vs. 2.0, P = 0.001). According to the trend of the CUSUM plot, the learning curve was divided into two stages at the 20th RAME procedure. After mastering the learning curve, RAME harvested a significantly higher number of upper mediastinal lymph nodes (median 9.0 vs. 6.0, P = 0.001), left RLN lymph nodes (median 5.0 vs. 3.5, P = 0.003), and right RLN lymph nodes (median 4.0 vs. 2.0, P = 0.002). Meanwhile, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in the proficiency phase was significantly lower than that in the learning phase (4.0% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS RAME improved left RLN lymph node dissection. Surgeons with extensive VAME experience need at least 20 cases to achieve early proficiency in RAME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Bo Sun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
| | - Duo Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Xian-Ben Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Wen-Qun Xing
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Shi-Lei Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Pei-Nan Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Peng Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Ya-Xing Ma
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Talavera-Urquijo E, Davies AR, Wijnhoven BPL. Prevention and treatment of a positive proximal margin after gastrectomy for cardia cancer. Updates Surg 2023; 75:335-341. [PMID: 35842570 PMCID: PMC9852102 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01315-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
A tumour-positive proximal margin (PPM) after extended gastrectomy for oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) adenocarcinoma is observed in approximately 2-20% of patients. Although a PPM is an unfavourable prognostic factor, the clinical relevance remains unclear as it may reflect poor tumour biology. This narrative review analyses the most relevant literature on PPM after gastrectomy for OGJ cancers. Awareness of the risk factors and possible measures that can be taken to reduce the risk of PPM are important. In patients with a PPM, surgical and non-surgical treatments are available but the effectiveness remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eider Talavera-Urquijo
- grid.414651.30000 0000 9920 5292Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Andrew R. Davies
- grid.420545.20000 0004 0489 3985Department of Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rebecchi F, Ugliono E, Allaix ME, Morino M. Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery? Updates Surg 2023; 75:367-372. [PMID: 35953621 PMCID: PMC9852204 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01351-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Esophagectomy is the gold standard for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. Traditionally, it is performed through a laparotomy and a thoracotomy, and is associated with high rates of postoperative complications and mortality. The advent of robotic surgery has represented a technological evolution in the field of esophageal cancer treatment. Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) has been progressively widely adopted following the first reports on the safety and feasibility of this procedure in 2004. The robotic approach has better short-term postoperative outcomes than open esophagectomy, without jeopardizing oncologic radicality. The results of the comparison between RAMIE and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are less conclusive. This article will focus on the role of RAMIE in the current clinical scenario with particular attention to its possible benefits and perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elettra Ugliono
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Imbrasaitė U, Giršvildaitė D, Baušys R, Baušys A. Surgical Treatment of Siewert II Gastroesophagel Junction Adenocarcinoma: Esophagectomy or Gastrectomy? Review. LIETUVOS CHIRURGIJA 2022. [DOI: 10.15388/lietchirur.2022.21.73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Introduction. Surgery is the only curative treatment option for patients with gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. These tumors can be resected by gastrectomy or esophagectomy depending on tumor localization. Although, both surgeries are available for Siewert type II GEJ cancer, it remains unknown which one is superior. This review summarizes current evidences on the optimal surgical approach for Siewert type II GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods. The literature search was performed within the PubMed database and 9 studies comparing gastrectomy and esophagectomy for Siewert type II GEJ adenocarcinoma were included. The outcomes of interest included: length of surgery, numbers of retrieved lymph nodes, resection margins, postoperative morbidity and mortality, hospitalization time, 5-year overall, and disease-free survival rates. Results. Current studies do not favor any type of surgery in terms of length of the surgery, R0 resection rate, or postoperative morbidity. There is some tendency towards higher anastomotic leakage and postoperative surgical site infections rate after gastrectomy, while a higher incidence of pneumonia after esophagectomy. Similar, available studies suggest, that esophagectomy may lead to improved long-term outcomes. Conclusions. There is a lack of high-quality studies comparing gastrectomy and esophagectomy for Siewert type II GEJ adenocarcinoma. Esophagectomy may lead to improved long-term outcomes, but this preliminary data has to be confirmed in large, randomized control trials.
Collapse
|
15
|
Aiolfi A, Sozzi A, Bonitta G, Lombardo F, Cavalli M, Cirri S, Campanelli G, Danelli P, Bona D. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:3297-3309. [PMID: 36242619 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02706-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different techniques have been described for esophagogastric anastomosis. Over the past decades, surgeons have been improving anastomotic techniques with a gradual shift from hand-sewn to stapled anastomosis. Nowadays, circular-stapled (CS) and linear-stapled (LS) anastomosis are commonly used during esophagectomy. METHODS PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to June 2022. The included studies evaluated short-term outcomes for LS vs. CS anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak (AL) and stricture (AS). Risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used as pooled effect size measures whereas 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used to assess relative inference. RESULTS Eighteen studies (2861 patients) were included. Overall, 1371 (47.9%) underwent CS while 1490 (52.1%) LS. Compared to CS, LS was associated with a significantly reduced RR for AL (RR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.91; p < 0.01) and AS (RR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.20-0.51; p < 0.0001). Stratified subgroup analysis according to the level of anastomosis (cervical and thoracic) still shows a tendency toward reduced risk for LS. No differences were found for pneumonia (RR 0.78; p = 0.12), reflux esophagitis (RR 0.74; p = 0.36), operative time (SMD -0.25; p = 0.16), hospital length of stay (SMD 0.13; p = 0.51), and 30-day mortality (RR 1.26; p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS LS anastomosis seems associated with a tendency toward a reduced risk for AL and AS. Although surgeon's own training and experience might direct the choice of esophagogastric anastomosis, our meta-analysis encourages the use of LS anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Aiolfi
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy. .,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Sozzi
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Bonitta
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Lombardo
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Cavalli
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Cirri
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giampiero Campanelli
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Danelli
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Bona
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hassan MA, Svendsen LB, Thorsteinsson M. Association between bacterial growth in chest tube and anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection: prospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:3407-3412. [PMID: 36205840 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02700-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to examine whether collagenase producing bacteria could be detected, in fluid collected from chest tubes, before clinical presentation of anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection. METHODS We conducted a prospective single-center study of patients who underwent resection of the gastroesophageal junction. All patients had a chest tube placed in the pleural cavity perioperatively. Drain fluid was collected and cultured from the first post-operative day and at time of routine removal of the drain (days 3-5). RESULTS From January 2018 to July 2019, a total of 84 patients were included in the study. Twenty (36%) patients experienced severe complications with a Clavien-Dindo score of 3b-5. Eleven (13%) patients were diagnosed with anastomotic leakage which occurred after 8 days (mean, range 2-13). Twenty patients (24%) had drain samples with significant growth of microbes. Among the 11 patients with anastomotic leakage, we found 2 with microbe growth at POD 2 and POD 4, the remaining 9 samples were negative (p = 0.638). Thirty-day mortality rate was zero. CONCLUSION Cultured fluid from the pleural cavity of asymptomatic patients following esophageal resection did not indicate a significant association with anastomotic leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Ali Hassan
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Slagelse Hospital, Ingemannsvej 18, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark.
| | - Lars Bo Svendsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Thorsteinsson
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Scognamiglio P, Reeh M, Melling N, Kantowski M, Eichelmann AK, Chon SH, El-Sourani N, Schön G, Höller A, Izbicki JR, Tachezy M. Management of intra-thoracic anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic vacuum therapy versus stenting. BMC Surg 2022; 22:309. [PMID: 35953796 PMCID: PMC9367146 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01764-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite a significant decrease of surgery-related mortality and morbidity, anastomotic leakage still occurs in a significant number of patients after esophagectomy. The two main endoscopic treatments in case of anastomotic leakage are self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and the endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT). It is still under debate, if one method is superior to the other. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature to compare the effectiveness and the related morbidity of SEMS and EVT in the treatment of esophageal leakage. We systematically searched for studies comparing SEMS and EVT to treat anastomotic leak after esophageal surgery. Predefined endpoints including outcome, treatment success, endoscopy, treatment duration, re-operation rate, intensive care and hospitalization time, stricture rate, morbidity and mortality were assessed and included in the meta-analysis. Seven retrospective studies including 338 patients matched the inclusion criteria. Compared to stenting, EVT was significantly associated with higher healing (OR 2.47, 95% CI [1.30 to 4.73]), higher number of endoscopic changes (pooled median difference of 3.57 (95% CI [2.24 to 4.90]), shorter duration of treatment (pooled median difference − 11.57 days; 95% CI [− 17.45 to − 5.69]), and stricture rate (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.08 to 0.62]). Hospitalization and intensive care unit duration, in-hospital mortality rate, rate of major and treatment related complications, of surgical revisions and of esophago-tracheal fistula failed to show significant differences between the two groups. Our analysis indicates a high potential for EVT, but because of the retrospective design of the included studies with potential biases, these results must be interpreted with caution. More robust prospective randomized trials should further investigate the potential of the two procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Scognamiglio
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Matthias Reeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nathaniel Melling
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marcus Kantowski
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Eichelmann
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Seung-Hun Chon
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nader El-Sourani
- Department for General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Schön
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexandra Höller
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Tachezy
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wei R, Ding X, Chen Z, Xin N, Liu C, Fang Y, Xu Z, Huang K, Tang H. Clinical comparative study of glasses-free 3D and 2D thoracoscopic surgery in minimally invasive esophagectomy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:959484. [PMID: 35992851 PMCID: PMC9389333 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.959484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of glasses-free three-dimensional (3D) thoracoscopic surgery in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Methods The clinical data of 98 patients, including 81 men and 17 women aged 45–77 years, with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy from January 2017 to December 2019 [3 years, with clinical follow-up time: 1 year~4 years (2017.01–2020.12)] were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods including a glasses-free 3D thoracoscopic group (G-3D group: 38 patients) and a two-dimesional (2D) thoracoscopic group (2D group: 60 patients). The clinical outcome of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time of the thoracoscopic part in the G-3D group was significantly shorter than that in the 2D group (P<0.05). The total number of lymph node dissection in the G-3D group was more than that in the 2D group (P<0.05). The thoracic indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, severe pulmonary infection, arrhythmia, anastomotic leakage, chylothorax, and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). There was also no significant difference between the two groups on the progression-free survival (P>0.05). Conclusion Glasses-free 3D thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer is a safe and effective surgical procedure. Compared with 2D thoracoscopic MIE, glasses-free 3D thoracoscopic MIE for esophageal cancer has higher safety, more lymph node dissection, and higher operation efficiency through the optimized surgical operations. We believe that glasses-free 3D thoracoscopy for MIE is worthy of clinical promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongqiang Wei
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinyu Ding
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zihao Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ning Xin
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chengdong Liu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunhao Fang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhifei Xu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kenan Huang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Hua Tang, ; Kenan Huang,
| | - Hua Tang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Hua Tang, ; Kenan Huang,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Esagian SM, Ziogas IA, Skarentzos K, Katsaros I, Tsoulfas G, Molena D, Karamouzis MV, Rouvelas I, Nilsson M, Schizas D. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133177. [PMID: 35804949 PMCID: PMC9264782 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) constitutes a newly developed surgical technique for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer, aiming to further improve the high morbidity and mortality associated with open esophagectomy. We performed a systematic review of the literature and compared the outcomes of RAMIE and open esophagectomy. RAMIE is a safe and feasible procedure, resulting in decreased cardiopulmonary morbidity, wound infections, blood loss, and hospital stays compared to open esophagectomy. Abstract Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was introduced as a further development of the conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy, aiming to further improve the high morbidity and mortality associated with open esophagectomy. We aimed to compare the outcomes between RAMIE and open esophagectomy, which remains a popular approach for resectable esophageal cancer. Ten studies meeting our inclusion criteria were identified, including five retrospective cohort, four prospective cohort, and one randomized controlled trial. RAMIE was associated with significantly lower rates of overall pulmonary complications (odds ratio (OR): 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.26, 0.56]), pneumonia (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: [0.26, 0.57]), atrial fibrillation (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: [0.29, 0.98]), and wound infections (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: [0.07, 0.57]) and resulted in less blood loss (weighted mean difference (WMD): −187.08 mL, 95% CI: [−283.81, −90.35]) and shorter hospital stays (WMD: −9.22 days, 95% CI: [−14.39, −4.06]) but longer operative times (WMD: 69.45 min, 95% CI: [34.39, 104.42]). No other statistically significant difference was observed regarding surgical and short-term oncological outcomes. Similar findings were observed when comparing totally robotic procedures only to OE. RAMIE is a safe and feasible procedure, resulting in decreased cardiopulmonary morbidity, wound infections, blood loss, and shorter hospital stays compared to open esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stepan M. Esagian
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, 151-23 Athens, Greece; (S.M.E.); (I.A.Z.); (K.S.); (I.K.)
| | - Ioannis A. Ziogas
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, 151-23 Athens, Greece; (S.M.E.); (I.A.Z.); (K.S.); (I.K.)
| | - Konstantinos Skarentzos
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, 151-23 Athens, Greece; (S.M.E.); (I.A.Z.); (K.S.); (I.K.)
| | - Ioannis Katsaros
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, 151-23 Athens, Greece; (S.M.E.); (I.A.Z.); (K.S.); (I.K.)
- First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, 115-27 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- First Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541-24 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Michalis V. Karamouzis
- Molecular Oncology Unit, Department of Biological Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115-27 Athens, Greece;
| | - Ioannis Rouvelas
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 141-86 Stockholm, Sweden; (I.R.); (M.N.)
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 171-77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 141-86 Stockholm, Sweden; (I.R.); (M.N.)
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 171-77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Schizas
- First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, 115-27 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Garbarino GM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Eshuis WJ. Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in the Surgical Treatment of Barrett's Adenocarcinoma. Visc Med 2022; 38:203-211. [PMID: 35814974 PMCID: PMC9210033 DOI: 10.1159/000524928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Barrett's esophagus is a premalignant condition caused by longstanding gastroesophageal reflux disease and may progress to low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and finally esophageal adenocarcinoma. Summary Barrett's adenocarcinoma can be treated either by endoscopic or surgical resection, depending on the clinical staging. Endoscopic resection is a safe and adequate treatment option for HGD, mucosal tumors, and low-risk submucosal tumors. Its role in the treatment of high-risk submucosal tumors and the role of organ-preserving sentinel node navigated surgery are still under investigation. Esophagectomy with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy is considered the standard of care for locally advanced Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Regarding operative technique, there is no proven superiority of one technique over another, although a minimally invasive transthoracic technique seems most commonly applied nowadays. In this review, state-of-the-art evidence and future expectations are presented regarding indications for resection, neoadjuvant or perioperative therapy, type of surgery, and postoperative follow-up for Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Key Messages In Barrett's adenocarcinoma, endoscopic resection is the standard treatment option for low-risk mucosal and submucosal tumors. For high-risk submucosal tumors, endoscopic submucosal dissection with close surveillance and sentinel node navigated surgery are currently being studied. For locally advanced cancer, a multimodal therapy including esophagectomy is the standard of care. Nowadays, in high-volume centers, a minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy with an intrathoracic anastomosis is the most common procedure for Barrett's adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Maria Garbarino
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mark Ivo van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Sarah Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietse Jelle Eshuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fabbi M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Fumagalli Romario U, Gandini S, Feenstra M, De Pascale S, Gisbertz SS. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:2681-2692. [PMID: 35639136 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02567-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The search for the optimal procedure for creation of a safe gastroesophageal intrathoracic anastomosis with a lower risk of leakage in totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (TMIIL) is ongoing. In the present study, we compared the outcomes of end-to-side (with circular stapler [CS]) and side-to-side (with linear stapler [LS]) techniques for intrathoracic anastomosis during TMIIL performed in 2 European high-volume centers for upper gastrointestinal surgery. A propensity score method was used to compare the CS and LS groups. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated patients with lower esophageal cancer or Siewert type 1 or 2 esophagogastric junction carcinoma who underwent a planned TMIIL esophagectomy, performed from January 2017 to September 2020. The anastomosis was created by a semi-mechanical technique using a LS in one center and by a mechanical technique using a CS in the other center. General features, operative techniques, pathology data, and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Statistical evaluations were performed on the whole cohort, stratifying the analyses by risk strata factors identified with the propensity scores, and on a subgroup of patients matched by propensity score. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of anastomotic leakage in the two groups. Secondary endpoints included rates of anastomotic stricture and overall postoperative complications. RESULTS Considering the whole population, 256 patients were included; of those, 220 received the anastomosis with a circular stapler (CS group), and 36 received the anastomosis with a linear stapler (LS group). No significant differences by group in terms of sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and type of neoplasm were showed. The rate of anastomotic leakage did not differ in the two groups (9.6% CS vs. 5.6% LS, p = 0.438), as well as the rate of anastomotic stricture in the 3-month follow-up (0.9% CS vs. 2.8% LS, p = 0.367). The rate of chyle leakage and of pulmonary, cardiac, and infective complications was not significantly different in the groups. After propensity score matching, 72 patients were included in the analysis. The 2 obtained propensity score matched groups did not differ for any of the clinical and pathologic variables considered for the analysis, resulting in well-balanced cohorts. The results obtained on the whole population were confirmed in the matched groups. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study suggest that both techniques for esophagogastric anastomosis during TMIIL are feasible, safe, and effective, with comparable rates of postoperative anastomotic leakage and stricture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manrica Fabbi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Minke Feenstra
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefano De Pascale
- Department of Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kingma BF, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. An Editorial on Lymphadenectomy in Esophagectomy for Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:4676-4678. [PMID: 35499786 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11736-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands.
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schlottmann F, Casas MA, Molena D. Evidence-based approach to the treatment of esophagogastric junction tumors. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:159-167. [PMID: 35433293 PMCID: PMC8966513 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i3.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma is increasing in developed nations due to the rising prevalence of obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Due to the peculiar location in a histological transition zone between the esophagus and the stomach, the management of EGJ tumors is controversial. Two main surgical approaches exist: total gastrectomy with distal esophagectomy or esophagectomy by either transhiatal or transthoracic approach. These operations differ significantly in the extent of lymphadenectomy. In addition, patients with locally advanced disease can receive either preoperative chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy. This evidence-based review analyzes current evidence regarding the management of EGJ tumors in order to help defining the best surgical and systemic treatment of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1118AAT, Argentina
| | - María A Casas
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1118AAT, Argentina
| | - Daniela Molena
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tzortzakakis A, Kalarakis G, Huang B, Terezaki E, Koltsakis E, Kechagias A, Tsekrekos A, Rouvelas I. Role of Radiology in the Preoperative Detection of Arterial Calcification and Celiac Trunk Stenosis and Its Association with Anastomotic Leakage Post Esophagectomy, an Up-to-Date Review of the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041016. [PMID: 35205764 PMCID: PMC8870074 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Esophageal cancer is the sixth deadliest among all cancers worldwide. Multimodal treatment, including surgical resection of the esophagus, offers the potential for cure even in advanced cases, but esophagectomy is still associated with serious complications. Among these, anastomotic leakage has the most significant clinical impact, both in terms of prognosis and health-related quality of life. Identifying patients at a high risk for leakage is of great importance in order to modify their treatment and, if possible, avoid this complication. This review aims to study the current literature regarding the role of radiology in detecting potential risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage. The measurement of calcium plaques on the aorta, as well as the detection of narrowing of the celiac trunk and its branches, can be easily assessed by preoperative computed tomography, and can be used to individualize perioperative patient management to effectively reduce the rate of leakage. Abstract Surgical resection of the esophagus remains a critical component of the multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most significant complication following esophagectomy, in terms of clinical implications. Identifying risk factors for AL is important for modifying patient management and improving surgical outcomes. This review aims to examine the role of radiological risk factors for AL after esophagectomy, and in particular, arterial calcification and celiac trunk stenosis. Eligible publications prior to 25 August 2021 were retrieved from Medline and Google Scholar using a predefined search algorithm. A total of 68 publications were identified, of which 9 original studies remained for in-depth analysis. The majority of these studies found correlations between calcifications in the aorta, celiac trunk, and right post-celiac arteries and AL following esophagectomy. Some studies suggest celiac trunk stenosis as a more appropriate surrogate. Our up-to-date review highlights the need for automated quantification of aortic calcifications, as well as the degree of celiac trunk stenosis in preoperative computed tomography in patients undergoing esophagectomy, to obtain robust and reproducible measurements that can be used for a definite correlation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonios Tzortzakakis
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Radiology, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.T.); (G.K.)
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Functional Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Georgios Kalarakis
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Radiology, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.T.); (G.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Biying Huang
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; (B.H.); (A.T.)
- Department of General Surgery, Södertälje Hospital, 152 86 Södertälje, Sweden
| | - Eleni Terezaki
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Emmanouil Koltsakis
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Aristotelis Kechagias
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, 13530 Hämeenlinna, Finland;
| | - Andrianos Tsekrekos
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; (B.H.); (A.T.)
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Surgery, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ioannis Rouvelas
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; (B.H.); (A.T.)
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Surgery, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +46-70-797-68-14
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gantxegi A, Kingma BF, Ruurda JP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MDP, van Hillegersberg R. The Value of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy in Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1347-1356. [PMID: 34845567 PMCID: PMC8724204 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10810-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background The role of upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy for distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas remains a matter of debate. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of evidence on the incidence of nodal metastases in the upper mediastinum following transthoracic esophagectomy for distal esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases up to November 2020 to include studies on patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy for distal esophageal and/or GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was the incidence of metastatic nodes in the upper mediastinum based on pathological examination. Secondary endpoints were the definition of upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy rate and survival. Results A total of 17 studies were included and the sample sizes ranged from 10-634 patients. Overall, the median incidence of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases was 10.0% (IQR 4.7-16.7). The incidences of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases were 8.3% in the 7 studies that included patients undergoing primary resection (IQR 2.0-16.6), 4,4% in the 1 study that provided neoadjuvant therapy to the full cohort, and 10.6% in the 9 studies that included patients undergoing esophagectomy either with or without neoadjuvant therapy (IQR 8.9-15.8%). Data on survival and RLN palsy rates were scarce and inconclusive. Conclusions The incidence of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases in distal esophageal adenocarcinoma is up to 10%. Morbidity should be weighed against potential impact on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaia Gantxegi
- Department of Surgery, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Optimal surgery for esophagogastric junctional cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 407:1399-1407. [PMID: 34786603 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02375-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Esophagogastric junctional cancer is classified into three categories according to the Siewert classification, which reflects the epidemiological and biological characteristics. Therapeutic strategies have been evaluated according to the three Siewert types. There is a consensus that types I and III should be treated as esophageal cancer and gastric cancer, respectively. On the other hand, type II is often described as true cardiac cancer, which has different clinicopathological features from the other types. Thus, there is no consensus on the surgical management of type II esophagogastric junctional cancer. The optimal surgical management should focus on the principles of cancer surgery, which take into consideration oncological curability, including an appropriate resection margin, adequate lymphadenectomy, and minimization of postoperative complications. In this review, we evaluate the current relevant literature and evidence, on the surgical treatment of esophagogastric junctional cancer, focusing on type II. Esophagectomy with a thoracic approach has the advantage of ensuring a sufficient proximal resection margin and adequate mediastinal lymphadenectomy. However, the oncological benefit is offset by a high incidence of postoperative complications. Minimally invasive esophagectomy could be a possible solution to reduce complications and improve long-term outcomes. Further development of surgical treatments for Siewert type II is required to improve the outcomes. Furthermore, the surgical team should have expertise in both gastric cancer and esophageal cancer treatment, or patients should be managed with close collaboration between thoracic surgeons and gastric cancer surgeons.
Collapse
|
27
|
The Prognostic Impact of Histology in Esophageal and Esophago-Gastric Junction Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13205211. [PMID: 34680360 PMCID: PMC8533974 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Stage significantly affects survival of esophageal and esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinomas (EA/EGJAs), however, limited evidence for the prognostic role of histologic subtypes is available. The aim of the study was to describe a morphologic approach to EA/EGJAs and assess its discriminating prognostic power. Histologic slides from 299 neoadjuvant treatment-naïve EA/EGJAs, resected in five European Centers, were retrospectively reviewed. Morphologic features were re-assessed and correlated with survival. In glandular adenocarcinomas (240/299 cases-80%), WHO grade and tumors with a poorly differentiated component ≥6% were the most discriminant factors for survival (both p < 0.0001), distinguishing glandular well-differentiated from poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. Two prognostically different histologic groups were identified: the lower risk group, comprising glandular well-differentiated (34.4%) and rare variants, such as mucinous muconodular carcinoma (2.7%) and diffuse desmoplastic carcinoma (1.7%), versus the higher risk group, comprising the glandular poorly differentiated subtype (45.8%), including invasive mucinous carcinoma (5.7%), diffuse anaplastic carcinoma (3%), mixed carcinoma (6.7%) (CSS p < 0.0001, DFS p = 0.001). Stage (p < 0.0001), histologic groups (p = 0.001), age >72 years (p = 0.008), and vascular invasion (p = 0.015) were prognostically significant in the multivariate analysis. The combined evaluation of stage/histologic group identified 5-year cancer-specific survival ranging from 87.6% (stage II, lower risk) to 14% (stage IVA, higher risk). Detailed characterization of histologic subtypes contributes to EA/EGJA prognostic prediction.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kamarajah SK, Phillips AW, Griffiths EA, Ferri L, Hofstetter WL, Markar SR. Esophagectomy or Total Gastrectomy for Siewert 2 Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma? A Registry-Based Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8485-8494. [PMID: 34255246 PMCID: PMC8591012 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10346-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Backgrounds Due to a lack of randomized and large studies, the optimal surgical approach for Siewert 2 gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains unknown. This population-based cohort study aimed to compare survival between esophagectomy and total gastrectomy for the treatment of Siewert 2 GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010 to 2016 was used to identify patients with non-metastatic Siewert 2 GEJ adenocarcinoma who received either esophagectomy (n = 999) or total gastrectomy (n = 8595). Propensity score-matching (PSM) and multivariable analyses were used to account for treatment selection bias. Results Comparison of the unmatched cohort’s baseline demographics showed that the patients who received esophagectomy were younger, had a lower burden of medical comorbidities, and had fewer clinical positive lymph nodes. The patients in the unmatched cohort who received gastrectomy had a significantly shorter overall survival than those who received esophagectomy (median, 47 vs. 68 months [p < 0.001]; 5-year survival, 45 % vs. 53 %). After matching, gastrectomy was associated with significantly reduced survival compared with esophagectomy (median, 51 vs. 68 months [p < 0.001]; 5-year survival, 47 % vs. 53 %), which remained in the adjusted analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.35; p < 0.001). Conclusions In this large-scale population study with propensity-matching to adjust for confounders, esophagectomy was prognostically superior to gastrectomy for the treatment of Siewert 2 GEJ adenocarcinoma despite comparable lymph node harvest, length of stay, and 90-day mortality. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials with robust surgical quality assurance are the next step in evaluating the prognostic outcomes of these surgical strategies for GEJ cancer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10346-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alexander W Phillips
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.,School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. .,Department of Molecular Medicine & Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schroeder W, Mallmann C, Babic B, Bruns C, Fuchs HF. [Fast-track Rehabilitation after Oesophagectomy]. Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146:306-314. [PMID: 34154009 DOI: 10.1055/a-1487-7086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The multimodal and interprofessional concept of fast-track rehabilitation ("enhanced recovery after surgery", ERAS) is generally applicable to transthoracic oesophagectomy, but is associated with two special features as compared to other oncological procedures. Due to the high comorbidity of oesophageal cancer patients, fast-track pathways have to be considered as one component of perioperative management and cannot be separated from prehabilitation with preoperative conditioning of single organ dysfunctions. Since gastric reconstruction causes a high prevalence of delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE), early and sufficient postoperative oral feeding is not easily feasible. There is currently no generally accepted algorithm for the postoperative nutritional management as well as for the prophylaxis/treatment of DGCE. Fast-track prehabilitation does not influence the mortality rate in specialised centres. At present, it is not clear whether a fast-track pathway helps to reduce postoperative morbidity. After modified fast-track rehabilitation, hospital discharge is possible from the 8th postoperative day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Schroeder
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Deutschland
| | - Christoph Mallmann
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Deutschland
| | - Benjamin Babic
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Deutschland
| | - Christiane Bruns
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Deutschland
| | - Hans Friedrich Fuchs
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bona D, Lombardo F, Matsushima K, Cavalli M, Panizzo V, Mendogni P, Bonitta G, Campanelli G, Aiolfi A. Diaphragmatic herniation after esophagogastric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:1819-1829. [PMID: 34129106 PMCID: PMC8481172 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02214-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The anatomy of the esophageal hiatus is altered during esophagogastric surgery with an increased risk of postoperative hiatus hernia (HH). The purpose of this article was to examine the current evidence on the surgical management and outcomes associated with HH after esophagogastric surgery for cancer. Materials and methods Systematic review and meta-analysis. Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE data sets were consulted. Results Twenty-seven studies were included for a total of 404 patients requiring surgical treatment for HH after esophagogastric surgery. The age of the patients ranged from 35 to 85 years, and the majority were males (82.3%). Abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, and dyspnea were the commonly reported symptoms. An emergency repair was required in 51.5%, while a minimally invasive repair was performed in 48.5%. Simple suture cruroplasty and mesh reinforced repair were performed in 65% and 35% of patients, respectively. The duration between the index procedure and HH repair ranged from 3 to 144 months, with the majority (67%) occurring within 24 months. The estimated pooled prevalence rates of pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak, overall morbidity, and mortality were 14.1% (95% CI = 8.0–22.0%), 1.4% (95% CI = 0.8–2.2%), 35% (95% CI = 20.0–54.0%), and 5.0% (95% CI = 3.0–8.0%), respectively. The postoperative follow-up ranged from 1 to 110 months (mean = 24) and the pooled prevalence of HH recurrence was 16% (95% CI = 13.0–21.6%). Conclusions Current evidence reporting data for HH after esophagogastric surgery is narrow. The overall postoperative pulmonary complications, overall morbidity, and mortality are 14%, 35%, and 5%, respectively. Additional studies are required to define indications and treatment algorithm and evaluate the best technique for crural repair at the index operation in an attempt to minimize the risk of HH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Bona
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Lombardo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - Kazuhide Matsushima
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo Street, IPT, C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Marta Cavalli
- Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Milan, Italy
| | - Valerio Panizzo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Mendogni
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza, 35, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Bonitta
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Aiolfi
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Girotti PNC, Königsrainer I. Simple "way-out strategy" in case of intraoperative complications in a planned gastrectomy for AEG II. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1644-1648. [PMID: 33821413 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-04999-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo N C Girotti
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800, Feldkirch, Austria.
| | - Ingmar Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800, Feldkirch, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chouliaras K, Hochwald S, Kukar M. Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a review of the technique. Updates Surg 2021; 73:831-838. [PMID: 34014498 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01000-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal resection is a key component of the multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is gaining widespread approval amongst few centers with promising early data. There is significant variability in the operative approach utilized by different centers and this review describes, step-by-step, the operative technique at a high-volume tertiary center. The cornerstone of management is individualized surgical approach, based on patient, tumor and technical factors. Although our approach is based on aforementioned factors, our preferred approach is an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and this review focuses on that. The procedure is broken down into three key parts, starting with an abdominal exploration and creation of the gastric conduit, placement of jejunostomy tube, moving to thoracic mobilization and creation of the side-side 6 cm stapled esophagogastric anastomosis with a final abdominal portion to assure proper positioning of the conduit and reducing redundancy. This approach is fully robotic and a side to side anastomosis facilitates the creation of a widely patent anastomosis therefore minimizing the risk of anastomotic leaks and strictures. Our experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy, as has been previously published, is associated with a 5.1% of anastomotic leak and 7.6% of anastomotic stricture. The robotic platform further optimizes this technique and helps us safely accomplish a side to side stapled anastomosis. Superior instrument dexterity in a restricted thoracic space is facilitated by intracorporeal suturing and robotic stapling. Thus, it obviates the need for a larger thoracotomy incision, which is typically needed for an EEA anastomosis, and that is traditionally associated with higher stricture rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Chouliaras
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, 665 Elm Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
| | - Steven Hochwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, 665 Elm Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
| | - Moshim Kukar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, 665 Elm Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gopalakrishnan G, Kalayarasan R, Gnanasekaran S, Pottakkat B. The technique of fourth jejunal artery-based jejunal conduit for oesophagojejunostomy after thoracolaparoscopic oesophagogastrectomy for locally advanced Siewert type II tumour. J Minim Access Surg 2021; 17:236-240. [PMID: 32964877 PMCID: PMC8083754 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_99_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Locally advanced long Siewert type II tumor requires total gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy with distal esophagectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy for curative resection. In this scenario, a laparoscopic transhiatal approach is not feasible, and the conventional left thoracoabdominal approach is associated with increased morbidity. Aims and Objectives: To describe a novel technique of fourth jejunal artery based jejunal conduit for thoracoscopic esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy. Materials and Methods: The laparoscopic total gastrectomy with distal esophagectomy specimen is extracted through the periumbilical incision. A pedicled jejunal conduit based on the fourth jejunal artery is prepared, and the jejunal conduit is placed in the mediastinum under laparoscopic guidance. Using the thoracoscopic approach in a prone position, additional esophageal clearance and subcarinal lymphadenectomy are performed. Handsewn end to side esophagojejunostomy is performed at the level of the carina. Results: Three patients with long Siewert type II underwent this procedure after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. None of the patients had conduit related complications. All three patients had abdominal lymph node involvement and two patients had mediastinal lymph node involvement. Conclusion: Pedicled jejunal conduit based on the fourth jejunal artery is safe for intrathoracic anastomosis after minimally invasive esophagogastrectomy for locally advanced Siewert type II tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunasekaran Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Raja Kalayarasan
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Senthil Gnanasekaran
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Biju Pottakkat
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ma H, Song X, Li J, Zhao G. Application of mediastinal drainage tube in intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leakage for early diagnosis and effective treatment: a retrospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 16:52. [PMID: 33766053 PMCID: PMC7993533 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-021-01435-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most fatal complications after esophagectomy. In this study, we placed an additional drainage tube in the esophagus bed and evaluated its effect in early diagnosis and treatment of AL. Methods From January 2010 to August 2020, 312 patients with esophageal or cardia carcinoma underwent esophageal resection with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. A total of 138 patients with only one pleural drainage tube were divided into the “Control Group” and 174 patients with a pleural drainage tube and an additional mediastinal drainage tube (MDT) were divided into the “Tube Group”. For all patients, the incidence of postoperative AL, the time to diagnosis, time to recovery, and patient outcome were analyzed. Results No significant differences were observed in the AL rate (P = 0.837) and postoperative pain between two groups. However, in the Tube Group, almost all the patients were diagnosed prior to the appearance of hyperpyrexia, which was considered as the earliest and most common symptom after AL. In the Tube Group, a significant decrease was observed in the incidence of incurable fistula, which required re-operation or variable treatments under gastroscopy when compared to the Control Group (P = 0.032). Finally, patients in the Tube Group showed reduced post AL hospital day (P = 0.015) and a lower mortality, however, when compared to the Control Group, no significant differences were observed (P = 0.188). Conclusions Placement of an MDT does not prevent AL, but it is an effective approach for earlier diagnosis of AL and facilitates fistula healing and patient recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hainong Ma
- Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.,Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China
| | - Xu Song
- Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China. .,Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.
| | - Jie Li
- Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.,Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China
| | - Guofang Zhao
- Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.,Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Long-term outcomes after robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:119-125. [PMID: 33638759 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01219-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Robotic assistance has gained acceptance in thoracic procedures, including esophagectomy. There is a paucity of data regarding long-term outcomes for robotic esophagectomy. We previously reported our initial series of robot-assisted Ivor Lewis (RAIL) esophagectomy. We report long-term outcomes to assess the efficacy of the procedure. We performed a retrospective review of 112 consecutive patients who underwent a RAIL. Patient demographics, diagnosis, pathology, operative characteristics, post-operative complications, and long-term outcomes were documented. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all the variables. Primary endpoints were mortality and disease-free survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of the 112 patients, 106 had a diagnosis of cancer, with adenocarcinoma the dominant histology (87.5%). Of these 106 patients, 81 (76.4%) received neo-adjuvant chemoradiation. The 30-, 60-, and 90-day mortality was 1 (0.9%), 3 (2.7%), and 4 (3.6%), respectively. There were 9 anastomotic leaks (8%) and 18 (16.1%) patients had a stricture requiring dilation. All-patient OS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 81.4%, 60.5%, and 51.0%, respectively. For cancer patients, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was 81.3%, 59.2%, and 49.4%, respectively, and the DFS was 75.3%, 42.3%, and 44.0%. We have shown that long-term outcomes after RAIL esophagectomy are similar to other non-robotic esophagectomies. Given the potential advantages of robotic assistance, our results are crucial to demonstrate that RAIL does not result in inferior outcomes.
Collapse
|
36
|
European consensus on essential steps of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown Esophagectomy through Delphi methodology. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:446-460. [PMID: 33608767 PMCID: PMC8741699 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08304-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex and technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To master MIE, training in essential steps is crucial. Yet, no consensus on essential steps of MIE is available. The aim of this study was to achieve expert consensus on essential steps in Ivor Lewis and McKeown MIE through Delphi methodology. Methods Based on expert opinion and peer-reviewed literature, essential steps were defined for Ivor Lewis (IL) and McKeown (McK) MIE. In a round table discussion, experts finalized the lists of steps and an online Delphi questionnaire was sent to an international expert panel (7 European countries) of minimally invasive upper GI surgeons. Based on replies and comments, steps were adjusted and rephrased and sent in iterative fashion until consensus was achieved. Results Two Delphi rounds were conducted and response rates were 74% (23 out of 31 experts) for the first and 81% (27 out of 33 experts) for the second round. Consensus was achieved on 106 essential steps for both the IL and McK approach. Cronbach’s alpha in the first round was 0.78 (IL) and 0.78 (McK) and in the second round 0.92 (IL) and 0.88 (McK). Conclusions Consensus among European experts was achieved on essential surgical steps for both Ivor Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-021-08304-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
37
|
Baranov NS, Slootmans C, van Workum F, Klarenbeek BR, Schoon Y, Rosman C. Outcomes of curative esophageal cancer surgery in elderly: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:131-146. [PMID: 33643529 PMCID: PMC7896422 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i2.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of older patients is undergoing curative, surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Previous meta-analyses have shown that older patients suffered from more postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients, which may lead to patient selection based on age. However, only studies including patients that underwent open esophagectomy were included. Therefore, it remains unknown whether there is an association between age and outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy.
AIM To perform a systematic review on age and postoperative outcome in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.
METHODS Studies comparing older with younger patients with primary esophageal cancer undergoing curative esophagectomy were included. Meta-analysis of studies using a 75-year age threshold are presented in the manuscript, studies using other age thresholds in the Supplementary material. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between 1995 and 2020. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak, pulmonary and cardiac complications, delirium, 30- and 90-d, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included pneumonia and 5-year overall survival.
RESULTS Seven studies (4847 patients) using an age threshold of 75 years were included for meta-analysis with 755 older and 4092 younger patients. Older patients (9.05%) had higher rates of 90-d mortality compared with younger patients (3.92%), (confidence interval = 1.10-5.56). In addition, older patients (9.45%) had higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared with younger patients (3.68%), (confidence interval = 1.01-5.91). In the subgroup of 2 studies with minimally invasive esophagectomy, older and younger patients had comparable 30-d, 90-d and in-hospital mortality rates.
CONCLUSION Older patients undergoing curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have a higher postoperative mortality risk. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may be important for minimizing mortality in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaj S Baranov
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525GA, the Netherlands
| | - Cettela Slootmans
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525GA, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525GA, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan R Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525GA, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Schoon
- Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525GA, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525GA, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Veenstra MMK, Smithers BM, Visser E, Edholm D, Brosda S, Thomas JM, Gotley DC, Thomson IG, Wijnhoven BPL, Barbour AP. Complications and survival after hybrid and fully minimally invasive oesophagectomy. BJS Open 2021; 5:6133613. [PMID: 33609389 PMCID: PMC7893474 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) is reported to produce fewer respiratory complications than open oesophagectomy. This study assessed differences in postoperative complications between MIO and hybrid MIO (HMIO) employing thoracoscopy and laparotomy, along with the influence of co-morbidities on postoperative outcomes. Methods Patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing three-stage MIO or three-stage HMIO between 1999 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively developed database, which included patient demographics, co-morbidities, preoperative therapies, and cancer stage. The primary outcome was postoperative complications in the two groups. Secondary outcomes included duration of operation, blood transfusion requirement, duration of hospital stay, and overall survival. Results There were 828 patients, of whom 722 had HMIO and 106 MIO, without significant baseline differences. Median duration of operation was longer for MIO (325 versus 289 min; P < 0.001), but with less blood loss (median 250 versus 300 ml; P < 0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (median 12 versus 13 days; P = 0.006). Respiratory complications were not associated with operative approach (31.1 versus 35.2 per cent for MIO and HMIO respectively; P = 0.426). Anastomotic leak rates (10.4 versus 10.2 per cent) and 90-day mortality (1.0 versus 1.7 per cent) did not differ. Cardiac co-morbidity was associated with more medical and surgical complications. Overall survival was associated with AJCC stage and co-morbidities, but not operative approach. Conclusion MIO had a small benefit in terms of blood loss and hospital stay, but not in operating time. Oncological outcomes were similar in the two groups. Postoperative complications were associated with pre-existing cardiorespiratory co-morbidities rather than operative approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M K Veenstra
- Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B M Smithers
- Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Upper Gastrointestinal/Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Mater Research Institute, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - E Visser
- Upper Gastrointestinal/Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - D Edholm
- Upper Gastrointestinal/Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - S Brosda
- Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - J M Thomas
- Upper Gastrointestinal/Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Mater Research Institute, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - D C Gotley
- Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Upper Gastrointestinal/Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - I G Thomson
- Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Upper Gastrointestinal/Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A P Barbour
- Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Upper Gastrointestinal/Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
de Groot EM, Goense L, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. State of the art in esophagectomy: robotic assistance in the abdominal phase. Updates Surg 2020; 73:823-830. [PMID: 33382446 PMCID: PMC8184533 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00937-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Over the years, robot-assisted esophagectomy gained popularity. The current literature focused mainly on robotic assistance in the thoracic phase, whereas the implementation of robotic assistance in the abdominal phase is lagging behind. Advantages of adding a robotic system to the abdominal phase include robotic stapling and the increased surgeon's independency. In terms of short-term outcomes and lymphadenectomy, robotic assistance is at least equal to laparoscopy. Yet high quality evidence to conclude on this topic remains scarce. This review focuses on the evidence of robotic assistance in the abdominal phase of esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M de Groot
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Lucas Goense
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Li B, Yang Y, Toker A, Yu B, Kang CH, Abbas G, Soukiasian HJ, Li H, Daiko H, Jiang H, Fu J, Yi J, Kernstine K, Migliore M, Bouvet M, Ricciardi S, Chao YK, Kim YH, Wang Y, Yu Z, Abbas AE, Sarkaria IS, Li Z. International consensus statement on robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:7387-7401. [PMID: 33447428 PMCID: PMC7797844 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-1945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Section of Esophageal Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Section of Esophageal Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Alper Toker
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Bentong Yu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Chang Hyun Kang
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ghulam Abbas
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Harmik J Soukiasian
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hecheng Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hiroyuki Daiko
- Department of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hongjing Jiang
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jianhua Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Yi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical Scholl of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Kemp Kernstine
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Marcello Migliore
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Medical Specialties, Policlinico University Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Michael Bouvet
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sara Ricciardi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular, Pathology and Critical Care, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Yin-Kai Chao
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan
| | - Yong-Hee Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yun Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhentao Yu
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Abbas E Abbas
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Inderpal S Sarkaria
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zhigang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Section of Esophageal Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chiu PWY, de Groot EM, Yip HC, Egberts JH, Grimminger P, Seto Y, Uyama I, van der Sluis PC, Stein H, Sallum R, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy: first clinical experiences and review of the literature. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33:5863451. [PMID: 33241301 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Pulmonary complications, and especially pneumonia, remain one of the most common complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. These complications are reduced by minimally invasive techniques or by avoiding thoracic access through a transhiatal approach. However, a transhiatal approach does not allow for a full mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A transcervical mediastinal esophagectomy avoids thoracic access, which may contribute to a decrease in pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. In addition, this technique allows for a full mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A number of pioneering studies have been published on this topic. Here, the initial experience is presented as well as a review of the current literature concerning transcervical esophagectomy, with a focus on the robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Wai-Yan Chiu
- Division of Upper GI and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Hon-Chi Yip
- Division of Upper GI and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jan-Hendrik Egberts
- Department for General, Visceral-, Thoracic-, Transplantation-, and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Peter Grimminger
- Department for General, Visceral-, Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Yasuyuki Seto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | | | - Hubert Stein
- Department of Global Clinical Development, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale CA, USA
| | - Rubens Sallum
- Departament of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
de Groot EM, van der Horst S, Kingma BF, Goense L, van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33:6006403. [PMID: 33241302 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Initial results of the ROBOT, which randomized between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and open transthoracic esophagectomy (OTE), showed significantly better short-term postoperative outcomes in favor of RAMIE. However, it is not yet clarified if RAMIE is equivalent to OTE regarding long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to report the long-term oncological results of the ROBOT trial in terms of survival and disease-free survival. This study is a follow-up study of the ROBOT trial, which was a randomized controlled trial comparing RAMIE to OTE in 112 patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer. Both the trial protocol and short-term results were previously published. The primary outcome of the current study was 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival and recurrence patterns. Analysis was by intention to treat. During the recruitment period, 109 patients were included in the survival analysis (RAMIE n = 54, OTE n = 55). Majority of patients had clinical stage III or IV (RAMIE 63%, OTE 55%) and received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (80%). Median follow-up was 60 months (range 31-60). The combined 5-year overall survival rates for RAMIE and OTE were 41% (95% CI 27-55) and 40% (95% CI 26-53), respectively (log rank test P = 0.827). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 42% (95% CI 28-55) in the RAMIE group and 43% (95% CI 29-57) in the OTE group (log rank test P = 0.749). Out of 104 patients, 57 (55%) developed recurrent disease detected at a median of 10 months (range 0-56) after surgery. No statistically difference in recurrence rate nor recurrence pattern was observed between both groups. Overall survival and disease-free survival of RAMIE are comparable to OTE. These results continue to support the use of robotic surgery for esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M de Groot
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sylvia van der Horst
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas Goense
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Leers JM, Knepper L, van der Veen A, Schröder W, Fuchs H, Schiller P, Hellmich M, Zettelmeyer U, Brosens LAA, Quaas A, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, Bruns CJ. The CARDIA-trial protocol: a multinational, prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing transthoracic esophagectomy with transhiatal extended gastrectomy in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) type II. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:781. [PMID: 32819399 PMCID: PMC7439687 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07152-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) Siewert type II can be resected by transthoracic esophagectomy or transhiatal extended gastrectomy. Both allow for a complete tumor resection, yet there is an ongoing controversy about which surgical approach is superior with regards to quality of life, oncological outcomes and survival. While some studies suggest a better oncological outcome after transthoracic esophagectomy, others favor transhiatal extended gastrectomy for a better postoperative quality of life. To date, only retrospective studies are available, showing ambiguous results. Methods This study is a multinational, multicenter, randomized, clinical superiority trial. Patients (n = 262) with a GEJ type II tumor resectable by both transthoracic esophagectomy and transhiatal extended gastrectomy will be enrolled in the trial. Type II tumors are defined as tumors with their midpoint between ≤1 cm proximal and ≤ 2 cm distal of the top of gastric folds on preoperative endoscopy. Patients will be included in one of the participating European sites and are randomized to either transthoracic esophagectomy or transhiatal extended gastrectomy. The trial is powered to show superiority for esophagectomy with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint overall survival. Key secondary endpoints are complete resection (R0), number and localization of tumor infiltrated lymph nodes at dissection, post-operative complications, disease-free survival, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Postoperative survival and quality of life will be followed-up for 24 months after discharge. Further survival follow-up will be conducted as quarterly phone calls up to 60 months. Discussion To date, as level 1 evidence is lacking, there is no consensus on which surgery is superior and both surgeries are used to treat GEJ type II carcinoma worldwide. The CARDIA trial is the first randomized trial to compare transthoracic esophagectomy versus transhiatal extended gastrectomy in patients with GEJ type II tumors. Several quality control measures were implemented in the protocol to ensure data reliability and increase the trial’s significance. It is hypothesized that esophagectomy allows for a higher rate of radical resections and a more complete mediastinal lymph node dissection, resulting in a longer overall survival, while still providing an acceptable quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration The trial was registered on August 2nd 2019 at the German Clinical Trials Register under the trial-ID DRKS00016923.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Leers
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Laura Knepper
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Schröder
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Fuchs
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Petra Schiller
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 10, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 10, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Zettelmeyer
- Clinical Trials Centre Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Str. 269, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Quaas
- Institute for Pathology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Comparative Analysis of Blood and Bone Marrow for the Detection of Circulating and Disseminated Tumor Cells and Their Prognostic and Predictive Value in Esophageal Cancer Patients. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9082674. [PMID: 32824841 PMCID: PMC7464950 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Hematogenic tumor cell spread is a key event in metastasis. However, the clinical significance of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in the blood and disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in bone marrow is still not fully understood. Here, the presence of DTC and CTC in esophageal cancer (EC) patients and its correlation with clinical parameters was investigated to evaluate the CTC/DTC prognostic value in EC. This study included 77 EC patients with complete surgical tumor resection. CTC and DTC were analyzed in blood and bone marrow using nested CK20 reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and findings were correlated with clinical data. Twenty-seven of 76 patients (36.5%) showed CK20 positivity in the blood, 19 of 61 patients (31.1%) in bone marrow, and 40 (51.9%) of 77 patients were positive in either blood or bone marrow or both. In multivariate analyses, only the DTC status emerged as independent predictor of overall and tumor specific survival. Our study revealed that, while the presence of CTC in blood is not associated with a worse prognosis, DTC detection in the bone marrow is a highly specific and independent prognostic marker in EC patients. Larger cohort studies could unravel how this finding can be translated into improved therapy management in EC.
Collapse
|
45
|
Vetter D, Gutschow CA. Strategies to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:1069-1077. [PMID: 32651652 PMCID: PMC7686179 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01926-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Surgery remains the cornerstone of esophageal cancer treatment but is burdened with high procedure-related morbidity. Anastomotic leakage as the most important surgical complication after esophagectomy is a key indicator for quality in surgical outcome research. Purpose The aim of this narrative review is to assess and summarize the current knowledge on prevention of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and to provide orientation for the reader in this challenging field of surgery. Conclusions There are various strategies to reduce postoperative morbidity and to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy, including adequate patient selection and preparation, and many technical-surgical and anesthesiological details. The scientific evidence regarding those strategies is highly heterogeneous, ranging from expert’s recommendations to randomized controlled trials. This review is intended to serve as an empirical guideline to improve the clinical management of patients undergoing esophagectomy with a special focus on anastomotic leakage prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Vetter
- Division Head Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian A Gutschow
- Division Head Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Distribution of lymph node metastases in locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (cT2-4): comparison between Siewert type I and selected Siewert type II tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:509-519. [PMID: 32514766 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01894-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The distribution of lymph node metastases in locally advanced Siewert type I and type II AEG (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction) remains unclear. The diversity of data in the literature reflects the non-uniformity of tumor stages and surgical procedures in previous studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Based on a retrospective analysis from our single-center database, we examined distributions of lymph node metastases in types I and II cT2-4 AEG. The dataset comprised 44 patients; 19 and 25 patients had type I and type II, respectively. All patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy and total mediastinal lymphadenectomy, which included dissection of the upper mediastinal lymph nodes. The histological data of the surgical specimens were analyzed to evaluate metastasis rates in each lymph node station according to the Japanese Esophageal Society (JES) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines. RESULTS Lymph node metastases were observed in 75.0% cases (n = 33/44). There was no significant difference in the total lymph node metastasis rate between the two groups (type I 73.7% versus type II 76.0%). On comparing each lymph node region separately, no statistically significant differences were noted between the groups: upper mediastinal (type I 31.6% versus type II 24.0%), middle and lower mediastinal (type I 31.6% versus type II 44.0%), paragastric (type I 61.1% versus type II 76.0%), and celiac lymph nodes (type I 16.7% versus type II 25.0%). CONCLUSION In advanced clinical stages, the metastasis rate is high at all mediastinal lymph node regions in both type I and type II AEGs.
Collapse
|
47
|
Marchesi F, Dalmonte G, Morini A, Annicchiarico A. Laparoscopic repair of a giant hiatal hernia after minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2020; 102:e130-e132. [PMID: 32326737 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy has become popular, but studies showed a higher rate of postoperative hiatus hernia compared with open oesophagectomy. Our video presents the laparoscopic biosynthetic mesh repair of a symptomatic giant hiatus hernia in a 71-year-old man who had undergone minimally invasive oesophagectomy one year earlier for distal adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. The operative time was 120 minutes. The patient started oral intake on postoperative day one and was discharged on postoperative day three. Postoperative computed tomography at six months showed no signs of recurrence. In the setting of a symptomatic hiatus hernia post-minimally invasive oesophagectomy, we suggest an initial laparoscopic approach, because of its countless advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - A Morini
- Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vogt CD, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A. Tissue engineering of the gastroesophageal junction. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2020; 14:855-868. [PMID: 32304170 DOI: 10.1002/term.3045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The gastroesophageal junction has been of clinical interest for some time due to its important role in preventing reflux of caustic stomach contents upward into the esophagus. Failure of this role has been identified as a key driver in gastroesophageal reflux disease, cancer of the lower esophagus, and aspiration-induced lung complications. Due to the large population burden and significant morbidity and mortality related to reflux barrier dysfunction, there is a pressing need to develop tissue engineering solutions which can replace diseased junctions. While good progress has been made in engineering the bodies of the esophagus and stomach, little has been done for the junction between the two. In this review, we discuss pertinent topics which should be considered as tissue engineers begin to address this anatomical region. The embryological development and adult anatomy and histology are discussed to provide context about the native structures which must be replicated. The roles of smooth muscle structures in the esophagus and stomach, as well as the contribution of the diaphragm to normal anti-reflux function are then examined. Finally, engineering considerations including mechanics and current progress in the field of tissue engineering are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caleb D Vogt
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Borggreve AS, Kingma BF, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgical interventions for esophageal and gastric cancer in the acute setting: a nationwide cohort study. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:1219-1229. [PMID: 32215746 PMCID: PMC7886730 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07491-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastrectomy are increasingly performed and might be superior to their open equivalents in an elective setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether minimally invasive approaches can be safely applied in the acute setting as well. Methods All patients who underwent an acute surgical intervention for primary esophageal or gastric cancer between 2011 and 2017 were identified from the nationwide database of the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA). Conversion rates, postoperative complications, re-interventions, postoperative mortality, hospital stay and oncological outcomes (radical resection rates and median lymph node yield) were evaluated. Results Between 2011 and 2017, surgery for esophagogastric cancer was performed in an acute setting in 2% (190/8861) in The Netherlands. A total of 14 acute resections for esophageal cancer were performed, which included 7 minimally invasive esophagectomies and 7 open esophagectomies. As these numbers were very low, no comparison between minimally invasive and open esophagectomies was made. A total of 122 acute resections for gastric cancer were performed, which included 39 minimally invasive gastrectomies and 83 open gastrectomies. Conversion occurred in 9 patients (23%). Minimally invasive gastrectomy was at least comparable to open gastrectomy regarding postoperative complications (36% versus 51%), median hospital stay (9 days [IQR: 7–16 days] versus 11 days [IQR: 7–17 days]), readmissions (8% versus 11%) and oncological outcomes (radical resection rate: 87% versus 66%, median lymph node yield: 21 [IQR: 15–32 days] versus 16 [IQR: 11–24 days]). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer is safe and feasible in the acute setting, with at least comparable postoperative clinical and short-term oncological outcomes compared to open surgery but a relatively high conversion rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia S Borggreve
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kingma BF, Eshuis WJ, de Groot EM, Feenstra ML, Ruurda JP, Gisbertz SS, Ten Hoope W, Marsman M, Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Kalkman CJ, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Scholten HJ, Buise M, van Det MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, van der Meer F, Frederix GWJ, Cheong E, Al Naimi K, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Hillegersberg R. Paravertebral catheter versus EPidural analgesia in Minimally invasive Esophageal resectioN: a randomized controlled multicenter trial (PEPMEN trial). BMC Cancer 2020; 20:142. [PMID: 32087686 PMCID: PMC7036230 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6585-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thoracic epidural analgesia is the standard postoperative pain management strategy in esophageal cancer surgery. However, paravertebral block analgesia may achieve comparable pain control while inducing less side effects, which may be beneficial for postoperative recovery. This study primarily aims to compare the postoperative quality of recovery between paravertebral catheter versus thoracic epidural analgesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. METHODS This study represents a randomized controlled superiority trial. A total of 192 patients will be randomized in 4 Dutch high-volume centers for esophageal cancer surgery. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they are at least 18 years old, able to provide written informed consent and complete questionnaires in Dutch, scheduled to undergo minimally invasive esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and an intrathoracic anastomosis, and have no contra-indications to either epidural or paravertebral analgesia. The primary outcome is the quality of postoperative recovery, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire on the morning of postoperative day 3. Secondary outcomes include the QoR-40 questionnaire score Area Under the Curve on postoperative days 1-3, the integrated pain and systemic opioid score and patient satisfaction and pain experience according to the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) questionnaire, and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, the groups will be compared regarding the need for additional rescue medication on postoperative days 0-3, technical failure of the pain treatment, duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery, total postoperative fluid administration day 0-3, postoperative vasopressor and inotrope use, length of urinary catheter use, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, chronic pain at six months after surgery, and other adverse effects. DISCUSSION In this study, it is hypothesized that paravertebral analgesia achieves comparable pain control while causing less side-effects such as hypotension when compared to epidural analgesia, leading to shorter postoperative length of stay on a monitored ward and superior quality of recovery. If this hypothesis is confirmed, the results of this study can be used to update the relevant guidelines on postoperative pain management for patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry, NL8037. Registered 19 September 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B F Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - W J Eshuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M de Groot
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M L Feenstra
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Ten Hoope
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Marsman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Hermanides
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W Hollmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C J Kalkman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - H J Scholten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M Buise
- Department of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M J van Det
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - E A Kouwenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - F van der Meer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Group Twente Almelo, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - G W J Frederix
- Department of Public Health, Healthcare Innovation & Evaluation and Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - E Cheong
- Department of Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - K Al Naimi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | | | - R van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|