Effectiveness of postoperative superficial radiotherapy following the keloid-cross-flap surgery for auricular keloid: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Retaining partial keloid skin to make cross flaps (keloid-cross-flap surgery) is a modification of the core excision. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of superficial radiotherapy versus compression therapy after keloid-cross-flap surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, auricular keloid patients were consecutively screened from January 2019 to December 2021. They underwent keloid-cross-flap surgery and then enter either the superficial radiotherapy or the compression treatment group. The primary outcome was the one-year keloid recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included: non-completion rate of adjuvant treatment; Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores and auricular aesthetics scores, evaluated by a four-point Likert scale (1 = poor to 4 = excellent) of non-recurring patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

123 patients were included in the superficial radiotherapy group and 128 in the compression treatment group. Non-completion rate was significantly higher in the compression treatment group (17.97 %), while the loss rate was comparable between the two groups. Overall, 13 patients (13.54 %) relapsed in superficial radiotherapy group, while 22 patients (25.58 %) in compression group (p < 0.05). After PSM, 59 patients in each group were analyzed, and the recurrence rate was lower in the superficial radiotherapy group (13.56 %). Of relapse-free patients, no significant difference was found in PSAS scores, OSAS scores or aesthetic scores between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Keloid-cross-flap surgery could provide favorable morphologic repair of the auricular keloid, and postoperative superficial radiotherapy shows higher compliance and lower recurrence rate comparing to compression treatment.

Comprehensive Insights into Keloid Pathogenesis and Advanced Therapeutic Strategies

Keloid scars, characterized by abnormal fibroproliferation and excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) production that extends beyond the original wound, often cause pruritus, pain, and hyperpigmentation, significantly impacting the quality of life. Keloid pathogenesis is multifactorial, involving genetic predisposition, immune response dysregulation, and aberrant wound-healing processes. Central molecular pathways such as TGF-β/Smad and JAK/STAT are important in keloid formation by sustaining fibroblast activation and ECM deposition. Conventional treatments, including surgical excision, radiation, laser therapies, and intralesional injections, yield variable success but are limited by high recurrence rates and potential adverse effects. Emerging therapies targeting specific immune pathways, small molecule inhibitors, RNA interference, and mesenchymal stem cells show promise in disrupting the underlying mechanisms of keloid pathogenesis, potentially offering more effective and lasting treatment outcomes. Despite advancements, further research is essential to fully elucidate the precise mechanisms of keloid formation and to develop targeted therapies. Ongoing clinical trials and research efforts are vital for translating these scientific insights into practical treatments that can markedly enhance the quality of life for individuals affected by keloid scars.

Efficacy and Safety of Excision Combination Therapies for Earlobe Keloids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different combinations of excision and adjuvant therapies have been applied to improve outcomes for earlobe keloids, though evidence in this field is still lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to systematically investigate efficacy and safety of these treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to find all relevant studies. Meta-analysis of recurrence rates (RRs) and adverse event rates with 95% confidence intervals, and individual participants data (IPD) were calculated for each intervention when possible. Otherwise, narrative syntheses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 articles, covering 23 treatments for earlobe keloids, were included, indicating a preference for multiple combination therapy. The estimated RRs for 6 interventions (i.e., excision monotherapy, combinations of excision with imiquimod, pressure therapy, radiotherapy, steroids, and steroids with pressure therapy) appeared to be comparable. Electron radiotherapy was found to have potential advantages over X-ray treatment, contributing to the observed heterogeneity. Further meta-analysis using IPD revealed that both combination therapies of excision plus steroid therapy (p=0.003) and excision plus radiotherapy (p=0.003) yielded better recurrence-free survival compared to excision alone. The median recurrence-free interval for combination therapy was 10 months. Adverse event rates were similar among different intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that combining excision with radiotherapy or perioperative steroid therapy has the potential to improve prognosis of earlobe keloids without increasing the risk of adverse events. Overall evaluation of patients' conditions and further studies with sufficient follow-up are warranted for clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Outcomes of omega variant keystone flap in conjunction with single fraction radiotherapy for helical keloids: A comprehensive one-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Achieving esthetically pleasing results for helical keloids can be challenging. This study aims to share the results of a treatment approach for helical keloids, which involves complete excision and reconstruction using an omega variant keystone flap, followed by a single fractional radiotherapy.

METHODS

The current study is a retrospective review of 25 helical keloids in 21 patients from May 2021 to March 2023. All keloid cases were excised entirely. We covered the defect with an omega variant keystone flap followed by a single fraction of 9.5 or 10 Gy radiotherapy within 24 h after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 12 months. The primary outcome was recorded as recurrence versus non-recurrence. The secondary outcome was scores assessed by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.

RESULTS

All 25 keloids in 21 patients completed the treatment protocol, with a follow-up interval of 12 months. Of these patients, 100% had successful treatment of their keloids without any keloid recurrence. The postoperative course was uneventful except for one case of early postoperative flap congestion, which was spontaneously healed without any interventions. Scores obtained from the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale showed that pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, and pliability significantly improved. (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully reconstructed helical keloids using an omega variant keystone flap after keloid removal followed by 9.5 or 10 Gy single fractional radiotherapy without any keloid recurrence in one-year follow-ups.

Keloid Intralesional Excision Reduces Recurrence: A Meta-analytic Study of the Available Literature on 608 Keloids

Background

The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of keloid intralesional excision (KILE) in preventing recurrence. Treatment of keloids using surgical excision alone leads to high rates of recurrence. To date, there are no widely accepted guidelines for keloid treatment, and a multitude of adjunctive therapies are used to reduce recurrence. Despite these efforts, recurrence remains high. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of the existing literature on KILE to determine its role in recurrence reduction.

Methods

A literature review using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed. Two authors independently evaluated studies for eligibility. Incidence of keloid recurrence was recorded, and a comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to assess the pooled keloid recurrence rate, as well as the effect of additional therapies.

Results

Twenty-two studies evaluating intralesional excision of 608 keloids were included in the study. Average time to follow-up was 19.2 months (range 6-35 months). A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted, demonstrating a pooled recurrence rate of 13% (95% confidence interval, 9%-16%). There was no evidence that using therapies in addition to KILE had a significant effect on the overall pooled recurrence rate.

Conclusions

A meta-analysis of 608 keloids shows that KILE is an effective technique in preventing keloid recurrence, with a pooled recurrence rate of 13% compared with previously reported rates of 45%-100% after complete excision. Although there are no standard guidelines for keloid treatment, our meta-analysis shows that KILE is promising in recurrence reduction.

Our Experience at Tertiary Medical College-Intralesional Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Injection Verapamil Following Keloidectomy with Fillet Flap in Auricular Keloids

Keloid, which forms as an excessive tissue response to trauma to the skin, is a benign, hyperproliferative, recurrent growth of dermal collagen without a quiescent or regressive period throughout the process of wound healing. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with treatment and to compare the efficacy of intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide against verapamil after keloidectomy with fillet flap in auricular keloids. Our study was Duration based prospective observational study with a Duration of two years from June 2021 till May 2023 with study population inclusive of 50 patients aged between 20 and 70 years having recurrent keloid(s) over the pinna of any size or site. Keloidectomy with fillet flap and intralesional injection of trimcinolone acetonide was performed on 25 patients (30 keloids) in Group A, and keloidectomy with fillet flap and intralesional injection of verapamil was performed on 25 patients (30 keloids) in Group B. With a recurrence rate of 27%, eight keloids in Group A patients had an early recurrence three months following surgery. At nine months, nine more mixed-type cases with a 30% recurrence rate resurfaced. Recurrence seen in eight keloids out of 28 showed a 28.57% recurrence rate 12 months following surgery. Three people in Group B with three sessile keloids experienced an early recurrence at three months after surgery, with a recurrence rate of 10%. At nine months, four more cases of mixed kind returned, with a recurrence rate of 13%. A recurrence rate of 14.28% was found in 4 of 28 keloids at 12 months postoperatively. The Patient and Observer Scar Assesment Scale scores (POSAS scores) were consistently higher than Beausang scores at 1 year, indicating high patient satisfaction compared to physician assessment in both groups A and B. A keloid recurrence-free interval of 11.36 months was obtained by the Kaplan-Meier survival test (p < 0.05) in group A. Keloid recurrence-free interval of 10.98 months was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier survival test (p < 0.05) in group B. Among Keloidectomy with fillet flap surgery with intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide (group A) and keloidectomy with fillet surgery with intralesional injection of verapamil (group B), at each follow-up the success rate of group B was higher than group A indicating better trend of success in this group in terms of both absence of recurrence and absence of complications without statistically significant difference between them which shown both procedures more or less similar.

Postoperative Scar Management Protocol for Asian Patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative scar formation remains a morbidity for patients even with the advent of minimally invasive techniques. Furthermore, the significant difference between the Asian and Caucasian skin results in poorer postoperative scar outcomes in Asians, supporting the need for an evidence-based scar management protocol.

METHODS

Following a literature review of the PubMed and the Cochrane databases over the past 10 years, we constructed a novel postoperative scar management protocol for the Asian skin, utilized in a Singaporean tertiary healthcare institution.

RESULTS

We describe a timeline-based scar protocol from the point of skin closure to a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We support the use of intraoperative botulinum toxin for selected high-risk individuals upon skin closure with a follow-up regimen in the postoperative setting. For recalcitrant keloids, we have described a multimodal therapy comprising elements of intralesional steroids, botulinum toxin, lasers, surgery, and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A consolidated postoperative scar management protocol provides the necessary guidance for improved scar outcomes in the Asian skin. There is inherent potential in expanding the protocol to include post-traumatic and burn wounds or support other skin types including the Caucasian skin.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Excision and adjuvant treatment to prevent keloid recurrence. - a systematic review of prospective, clinical, controlled trials

Keloids are defined as the formation of collagen-rich scar tissue extending beyond the original lesion. Not all keloids respond to conventional treatment with intralesional triamcinolone injections. Recurrence of keloids after primary excision is reported in almost 100% of cases and should therefore always be followed by adjuvant treatment. Currently, consensus on preferred adjuvant treatment in relation to keloid excision is lacking. This study seeks to systematically review evidence on the efficacy of adjuvant treatments in relation to keloid excision. A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed. Titles, abstracts, and articles were screened and sorted according to defined inclusion- and exclusion criteria. Each study was evaluated according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, OCEBM, Levels of Evidence by two independent authors. Seven studies were eligible. Adjuvant treatment methods included intralesional triamcinolone injection, radiotherapy, silicone gel, pressure therapy, verapamil hydrochloride and 5-fluorouracil. While all the included studies reported promising results, two studies showed that minimizing dosages when treating with radiotherapy or triamcinolone should be considered to avoid adverse events. However, a high risk of bias was found in all the included studies.

Histology and Vascular Architecture Study of Keloid Tissue to Outline the Possible Terminology of Keloid Skin Flaps

BACKGROUND

Using the keloid "epidermis" to cover a wound is widely used during treatment for keloids. Many flap terminologies have been used in literature. However, the definition of the flap is not well established. Here, we refined the definition of the flap and associated terminology and explored the survival mechanism of the 'flap' through histological analysis and blood supply studying.

METHODS

Histology and vascular study of keloid was carried out with keloid and its surrounding normal skin tissue which were collected from keloid patients following keloid resection operations. The histological structures and thicknesses of epidermal and subepidermal of the keloids were analyzed and measured using hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining. Vascular density and blood perfusion in the subepidermal layer of keloids (KDS) were analyzed using CD31 immunohistochemical staining and a laser speckle contrast imaging system (LSCI), respectively. The vascular network in KDS was visualized by CD31 immunofluorescence staining and three-dimensional reconstruction.

RESULTS

29 pieces of keloid and its surrounding normal skin tissue sample from ten patients were collected. Keloid samples were about 2 cm wide and 5 cm long. The normal skin samples were about 2 to 3 mm in width. The thickness of epidermal layer of keloids was (136.4 ± 35.3) μm, and the thickness of epidermal layer of surrounding normal skin was (78.8 ± 13.9) μm. There was statistical thickness difference between the two layers, t(20) = 7.469, P < 0.001. The total thickness of keloid epidermal and subepidermal layers was 391.4 ± 2.3 μm. The vascular density (13.9 ± 3.4/field) and blood flow perfusion (132.7 ± 31.3) PU in KDS were greater than that of surrounding normal skin (7.8 ± 2.3/field, 73.9 ± 17.9 PU), P < 0.001. Horizontally distributed vessels with several vertical branches were observed in 3D vascular network reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

The epidermal layer of keloid is thicker than that of surrounding normal skin. There is a vascular network structure under it. The vessels mainly locate at a depth of about 150 to 400 μm from the surface of keloid epidermis, randomly distribute and run parallel to the epidermis. Based on these characteristics which may ensure an adequate blood supply, we propose the concept of a "keloid subepidermal vascular network flap."

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Optimizing surgical outcome of auricular keloid with a novel multimodal approach

Various treatments are available for auricular keloids, but none has an absolute advantage. A practical and safe therapy to optimize the surgical outcome for auricular keloids is needed. We adopted a multimodal treatment of surgical enucleation, core fillet flap reconstruction, intraoperative corticosteroid injection, and immediate postoperative radiotherapy. There were no routine intralesional corticosteroid injections during follow-up. Keloid recurrences, complications, and risk factors for recurrences were analyzed. The outcome was compared with other published literatures. 45 auricular keloids were included in this study. 85.7% were female with an average age of 27.1 ± 7.5 years, and averaged size was 1.8 × 1.2 ± 0.9 × 0.6 cm. 71.1% were located at ear helix with 28.9% at the ear lobe. Nine keloids were classified as Chang-Park classification type I, 30 for type II, two for type III, and four for IV. The average radiation dosage was 1578.6 cGy. The recurrence rate was 6.7% at an average 24.1-month follow-up. There were no complications of surgery, radiotherapy, and intralesional corticosteroid injection. Our recurrence rate was lower than those in mono-adjuvant therapies of intraoperative corticosteroid injection or radiotherapy. This one-session multimodal approach optimizes treating auricular keloids with a low recurrence rate and minimal post-radiation and long-term corticosteroid injection-related complications.

The Most Current Algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A 2020 Update of the Algorithms Published 10 Years Ago

BACKGROUND

In 2010, this Journal published my comprehensive review of the literature on hypertrophic scars and keloids. In that article, I presented evidence-based algorithms for the prevention and treatment of these refractory pathologic scars. In the ensuing decade, substantial progress has been made in the field, including many new randomized controlled trials. To reflect this, I have updated my review.

METHODS

All studies were evaluated for methodologic quality. Baseline characteristics of patients were extracted along with the interventions and their outcomes. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comprehensive reviews were included if available.

RESULTS

Risk factors that promote hypertrophic scar and keloid growth include local factors (tension on the wound/scar), systemic factors (e.g., hypertension), genetic factors (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms), and lifestyle factors. Treatment of hypertrophic scars depends on scar contracture severity: if severe, surgery is the first choice. If not, conservative therapies are indicated. Keloid treatment depends on whether they are small and single or large and multiple. Small and single keloids can be treated radically by surgery with adjuvant therapy (e.g., radiotherapy) or multimodal conservative therapy. For large and multiple keloids, volume- and number-reducing surgery is a choice. Regardless of the treatment(s), patients should be followed up over the long term. Conservative therapies, including gel sheets, tape fixation, topical and injected external agents, oral agents, and makeup therapy, should be administered on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials on pathologic scar management have increased markedly over the past decade. Although these studies suffer from various limitations, they have greatly improved hypertrophic scar and keloid management. Future high-quality trials are likely to improve the current hypertrophic scar and keloid treatment algorithms further.

A 7-year Experience with Keloid Fillet Flap and Adjuvant Intralesional Corticosteroids

Context:

Keloids are fibroproliferative scars characterized by excessive collagen deposition beyond the margins of the original wound. Although many treatment modalities were described in the literature, no single first-line therapy is recommended, and its recurrence rate remains high.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy rate in treating auricle keloids after fillet flap excision combined with adjuvant intralesional steroid injections.

Settings and Design:

This was a retrospective study.

Materials and Methods:

Between 2012 and 2019, a total of 16 auricle keloids were treated at our center with fillet flap excision and adjuvant steroid injections. Intralesional steroid injections were given at the end of the first week and then administered at 4-week intervals until the lesions were soft and flat. Postoperative efficacy, complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction were analyzed.

Results:

A high improvement of the keloid was observed in 13 (81.2%) lesions. No major complications and no recurrence of the keloid were detected during the follow-up period (mean, 35 months). Regarding patient satisfaction, nine (81.8%) considered their result as excellent.

Conclusion:

This study showed that this approach is effective regardless of the keloid location at the auricle.

Surgical approach in the management of ear keloids: our experience with 30 patients

BACKGROUND

Ear keloids are benign, fibrous proliferations due to excessive collagen synthesis and deposition. It is a popular practice to pierce earlobes for decorative earrings and adornment; this might trigger the keloid process. Although there are varied treatment modalities, it is unsatisfactory and has always been a challenge. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment with intralesional therapy in auricular keloids.

METHODS

We included 30 patients with 45 keloids over the ear. Patients were evaluated (including detailed history, complete physical and local examination), and photographs and written informed consent were taken. They were treated with: excision and closure, intralesional and/or surface cryotherapy, ablative laser, intralesional steroids, and 5-fluorouracil. Excision and closure, and intralesional cryotherapy were done under local anesthesia. Closure was done after intramarginal excision with or without raising auto flaps, followed by intraoperative intralesional steroids to margins. Recurrence was assessed at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS

The age group of patients ranged from 14 to 57 years. A total of 32 out of 45 (71.1%) keloids were excised and were combined with intraoperative and postoperative intralesional steroid injection, with sessions depending on the patient's response. Eight (17.7%) and five (11.1%) keloids were treated using intralesional cryotherapy and only intralesional steroids, respectively. A total of 16.6% of patients had recurrence with one patient having recurrence of bilateral earlobes keloid.

CONCLUSION

Keloidectomy with intraoperative and postoperative intralesional steroid injections has been very effective in the treatment of ear keloids. Different treatment modalities act synergistically, but excision surgery gives good results as it aims at maintaining ear architecture.

Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Position statement of the Brazilian expert group GREMCIQ

Keloids (K) and hypertrophic scars (HS) are abnormal responses to wound healing that occur as the result of dermal inflammation. Despite the advances on their treatment, many patients still suffer from the negative effects of excessive scarring; its approach is impaired by the lack of objective data on different treatments and the large genetic variability among patients and the difficulties in producing multicentre studies. Their incidence among the Brazilian population is high, as the result of an admixture of Amerindians, Europeans and Africans ancestral roots. With the aim of producing multicentre studies on K and HS, a panel of senior Brazilian dermatologists focused on their treatment was invited to contribute with the K and HS Treatment Brazilian Guidelines. In the first part of this study, different treatment modalities for keloids and HS are fully reviewed by the panel. The second part of the study presents a consensus recommendation of treatment for different types of lesions. More than a literature review, this article aims to show the pitfalls and pearls of each therapeutic option, as well as a therapeutic approach by the Panel of Experts on keloids and Scars on a highly mixed population, providing simple guidelines.

Assessment of various intralesional injections in keloid: Comparative analysis

AIM

Intralesional triamcinolone is a gold standard in treating the keloids to comparation its effectiveness versus intralesional 5-fluorouracil intralesional verapamil and intralesional platelet-rich plasma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Several 160-cases were categorized into four groups of each Group-Containing 40 cases. Group-A (control) treated with intralesional triamcinolone and Group-B intralesional verapamil, Group-C intralesional 5-fluorouracil, and Group-D intralesional platelet-rich plasma. Patients were assessed for clinical response based on a decrease in the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) at baseline and the end of treatment.

RESULTS

The mean base-line POSAS score was 91 ± 10.98 SD check-in Group-A, 90 ± 10.85 in Group-B, 89 ± 10.06 in Group-C, and 92 ± 10.84 in Group-D.POSAS score after 24 weeks 36 ± 12.74 in Group-A, 29 ± 10.91 in Group-B, 39 ± 13.74 in Group-C, 36 ± 12.74 in Group-D. Statistically, a significant difference was observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

Intralesional verapamil reported to be the most effective therapy and platelet-rich plasma was effective as intralesional triamcinolone acetonide with no serious side effects and 5-fluorouracil was less effective in treating the keloids.

The Efficacy of Surgical Excision Plus Adjuvant Multimodal Therapies in the Treatment of Keloids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Research evaluating the efficacy of multimodal therapy for the treatment of keloids has reported combination regimens are most effective.

OBJECTIVE

To compare recurrence rates for keloids treated with surgery plus one adjuvant intervention (dual therapy) versus surgery plus 2 or more adjuvant interventions (triple therapy).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of combination treatment for keloids.

RESULTS

After full-text review, we included 60 articles representing 5,547 keloids: 5,243 received dual therapy, 259 received triple therapy, and 45 received quadruple therapy (the latter 2 groups were combined for analysis). The difference in recurrence rates between dual (19%) and triple therapy (11.2%) was not significant (p = .343). However, the difference in recurrence rates between dual therapy using surgery and radiation (18.7%) and triple therapy using surgery, radiation, and a third intervention (7.7%) was significant (p = .002). The differences for surgery and intralesional triamcinolone (TAC) showed trends toward significance, because keloids treated with dual therapy (21.7%) had a higher recurrence rate than those treated with triple therapy comprised of surgery, TAC, and another intervention (13.7%; p = .099).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy using surgery plus radiation and/or TAC as one of the adjuvant treatment modalities may achieve the lowest recurrence rates for keloids.

Massive ear keloids: Natural history, evaluation of risk factors and recommendation for preventive measures - A retrospective case series

Keloid disorder (KD) is an inherited wound healing ailment, frequently seen among Africans /African Americans and Asians.  Genetics of this disorder continues to be obscure and poorly understood.  Clinical manifestation of KD is quite variable and very diverse, spanning from individuals with one or very few small keloidal lesions, to those with numerous and very large lesions covering large portion of their skin. Ears are common locations for development of keloids.  Ear piercing is by far the leading triggering factor for ear keloid formation in genetically predisposed individuals. Although there are numerous publications about ear and earlobe keloids, there is a void in medical literature about massive ear keloids.  This paper focuses on the natural history of massive ear keloids and risk factors that lead to formation of these life-changing and debilitating tumors and recommendations for prevention.

[What's new in instrumental dermatology?]

This "What's new in instrumental dermatology" focuses on cutaneous oncologic surgery, base on a review of the 2012-2014 literature. First, the ability of dermatologists to make a good "oncologic reading of tumors" is the key of radical surgical treatment. Advantages and disadvantages of the biopsy are discussed. Then, the second message is the management of anticoagulants, that should not be interrupted for skin surgery. Despite recommendations, this practice is not followed in 40% of cases; this point is critical because bleeding complications are minor compared to potential morbidity of thrombotic events when stopping these medications. Regarding infection, nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is identified as a risk factor for wound infection. A preoperative shower with chlorhexidine and mupirocin topical decolonization of nostril reduces this risk. Surgical techniques are trying to reach minimalism, by reducing undermining and scarring. On the trunk, using deep slow resorbable sutures improve scarring. In addition using adhesive sutures (strip) reduce the wideness of scar. On the face, the lower third of the nose is the most challenging because of the free edges, which are deformable. In this location bilobed or trilobed transposition flap offer the advantage of remaining in the nasal aesthetic unit and not disturbing the free edges of the nasal orifices. Regarding scarring, early hypertrophic scar is now well defined and linked with transposition flaps of the nasal region. An early treatment with intralesional corticosteroid injection appears to be effective. Finally, the biological mechanism of the effectiveness of compression in the prevention and treatment of dystrophic scar is now clear. The mechanotransduction explain how a mechanical stress of the skin activates biological cell pathways, which regulate the quality of collagen synthesis and the arrangement of skin fibrosis.

Recent developments in the use of intralesional injections keloid treatment

Keloid scars are often considered aesthetically unattractive and frustrating problems that occur following injuries. They cause functional and cosmetic deformities, displeasure, itching, pain, and psychological stress and possibly affect joint movement. The combination of these factors ultimately results in a compromised quality of life and diminished functional performance. Various methods have been implemented to improve keloid scars using both surgical and non-surgical approaches. However, it has proven to be a challenge to identify a universal treatment that can deliver optimal results for all types of scars. Through a PubMed search, we explored most of the literature that is available about the intralesional injection treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids and highlights both current (corticosteroid, 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, interferon, cryotherapy and verapamil) and future treatments (interleukin-10 and botulinum toxin type A). The reference lists of retrieved articles were also analysed. Information was gathered about the mechanism of each injection treatment, its benefits and associated adverse reactions, and possible strategies to address adverse reactions to provide reliable guidelines for determining the optimal treatment for particular types of keloid scars. This article will benefit practitioners by outlining evidence-based treatment strategies using intralesional injections for patients with hypertrophic scars and keloids.